Fact
ba
.
se
Senate Floor: HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS ACT
Topics
Entities
Moderation
12 Speakers
Topics
No topics found
Entities
No entities found
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Hank Brown Hank Brown said 193 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
38%
Hank Brown said 3397 words of a total of 8845 words.
39%
Joe Biden Joe Biden said 96 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
19%
Joe Biden said 2114 words of a total of 8845 words.
24%
Jon Kyl Jon Kyl said 56 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
11%
Jon Kyl said 1255 words of a total of 8845 words.
15%
Lauch Faircloth Lauch Faircloth said 43 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
9%
Lauch Faircloth said 642 words of a total of 8845 words.
8%
Dianne Feinstein Dianne Feinstein said 28 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
6%
Dianne Feinstein said 522 words of a total of 8845 words.
6%
Slade Gorton Slade Gorton said 25 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
5%
Slade Gorton said 382 words of a total of 8845 words.
5%
The Presiding Officer The Presiding Officer said 43 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
9%
The Presiding Officer said 237 words of a total of 8845 words.
3%
Kit Bond Kit Bond said 12 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
3%
Kit Bond said 151 words of a total of 8845 words.
2%
Thad Cochran Thad Cochran said 3 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
1%
Thad Cochran said 28 words of a total of 8845 words.
1%
Bob Smith Bob Smith said 4 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
1%
Bob Smith said 24 words of a total of 8845 words.
1%
Trent Lott Trent Lott said 1 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
1%
Trent Lott said 11 words of a total of 8845 words.
1%
Wendell Ford Wendell Ford said 1 sentences of a total of 517 sentences.
1%
Wendell Ford said 11 words of a total of 8845 words.
1%
Full Transcript
Hank Brown
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate [[Page S 18064]] now turn to consideration of Calendar No. 231, H.R. 660.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3655517474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0613478071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0122346071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0065505294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0043469798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0028577915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0018777282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008661686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001646599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.62427E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.5914E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.7
Gunning-Fog Score
5.5
Coleman-Liau Index
6.6
SMOG Index
7.7
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1104057883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0291766715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0200903203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0155188813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0093611015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0041862728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0038535331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003487123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003014765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001854515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.05323E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.3
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1797953853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.012974361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0096588978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.006314514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033853506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033099794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.14577E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.2405E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.4902E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0155E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.772E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
96.768
Magnitude:
57
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Hank Brown
I further ask unanimous consent the bill be considered under the following limitation: 1 hour for debate on the bill to be equally divided between Senator Brown and Senator Biden, that no amendments be in order to the bill with the exception of one amendment, and that following the expiration or yielding back of debate time, the committee amendment be agreed to, the bill be read a third time, and the Senate proceed to a vote on passage of the bill with no intervening action or debate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.20067
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.5223378073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.047567088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0466505095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.027031728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0229981611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0207393095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0180939038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.011078133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0041163337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0041072093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003566744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.4623066634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1826762804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1453906414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.019662366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0195753077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095878895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033642416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020944532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012239335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.22385E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.04579E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.6
Gunning-Fog Score
7.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Hank Brown
Mr. President, for clarification, I ought to note the amendment that is referenced is the committee amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0240059206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0216683882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.006484209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0061129227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053442636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008921988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003996864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003701181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.66321E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.26638E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.558E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.9
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.5585961044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0849492848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0188613383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0091710892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041880776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010617804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003886601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001555004
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.62526E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.35576E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.90214E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.222
Magnitude:
46
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.2
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Hank Brown
Mr. President, the Civil Rights Act of 1968 was passed specifically to prohibit discrimination on the basis of race. Title VIII of the act was the Fair Housing Act. It prohibited discrimination on the basis of "race, color, religion or national origin" for any sale of housing, rental of housing, financing of housing, or provision of brokerage services.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1044523204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.020137422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0104030441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.009013321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0031966563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0027449118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020348178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014248726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011610752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000412631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001054313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
75.44
Magnitude:
47
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Hank Brown
The housing practices in which discrimination is prohibited include the following: Sale or rental of a dwelling, provision of services or facilities in connection with a sale or rental of a dwelling, steering any person to or away from a dwelling, misrepresenting availability of dwellings, discriminatory advertisements, and charging different fees provided and different benefits.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.16667
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.16667
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.31015
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0149956308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0085666456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.006286845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017206859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009435931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008497729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002573436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002051661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001065416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.34208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.14004E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Hank Brown
The 1974 Fair Housing Act, or title VIII of the Civil Rights Act, was amended to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex. In 1988, the Fair Housing Act was amended again to prohibit discrimination on the basis of being handicapped or familial status, which means living with children under 18. That is, the 1988 Fair Housing Act prohibition of discrimination on the basis of living with children under 18 included an exemption "for housing for older persons." In other words, H.R. 660, which enables housing for older persons, is not a new idea. This debate is really about refining the original one.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.28571
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.28571
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.54654
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
16.7637750506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.7457465865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.079342135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0234092513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0220018381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0100237819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0071050767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0040712748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0033385106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005664964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000140686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Hank Brown
To meet the definition for housing for older persons under current law, the housing must be intended for occupancy by persons 55 years or older, where there are "significant facilities and services" designed to meet the physical or social needs of older persons.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0027399325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0023394598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012648638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009633551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005542799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.66755E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.79148E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
6.03403E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.62013E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6093E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8595E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
21.091
Magnitude:
3
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Hank Brown
Interpreting and implementing the "significant facilities and services" standard has been very troublesome. In other words, it has been a pain in the neck because it has been vague, it has been difficult, it has spawned litigation and created confusion. For the last 7 years, it has been unclear what "significant facilities and services" means. There have been so many lawsuits that the exemption Congress intended is fast being revoked in fact.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.38462
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.38462
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.74721
VADER
-0.88
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0938997255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0064340464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0036725596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007236058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003855929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003620564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
7.05075E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.59085E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.23432E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.65999E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.2633E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
67.331
Magnitude:
17
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Hank Brown
Mr. President, the way bureaucrats have administered this provision would make the people who came up with the Mississippi literacy test proud. It acts as a bar to the reasonable provisions of the law that were intended to make housing available for families with children while continuing to allow housing for older persons. The fact is, some older people do prefer not to have the noise and the trauma that go along with having children. Frankly, families with children sometimes prefer not to have the complaints about their activity as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.74721
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0679314369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0164821817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0134680726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.00448143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0026697642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015039012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002605391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001598808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001505914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.60515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.30964E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Hank Brown
H.R. 660 is intended to clear up this problem. It is intended to make the law clear and workable, and to stabilize the original exemption Congress created for senior housing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1204463653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0244101277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0051726936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007916274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006236867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0006148899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000299473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001578683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.68695E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.46403E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.67E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Hank Brown
In other words, what we are dealing with here is making the law clearer and more workable for seniors. This bill aims to protect seniors so that they can, if they wish to, move into housing where they are protected in their safety and their privacy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.875
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0569345662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0408440479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.028057961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0246603595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0145263242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0033414821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0029023844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0022695065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018732853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008689735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004316667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Education
Score:
53.509
Magnitude:
14
Code:
6
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#6
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Hank Brown
H.R. 660 will clarify the law and put in place a bright line test for senior housing. The test is: First, the housing is intended and operated for seniors; second, there is an actual 80 percent occupancy rate of the occupied units; third, the intent is manifested by published policies of the housing community; and fourth, the housing community complies with HUD rules. If that is met, then senior housing is safe from lawsuit.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
2.6422243565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.073171145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.05295421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0439599156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0419585675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.041310949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.028612453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0101169288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004468489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003790209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001246749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
82.972
Magnitude:
63
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Hank Brown
This revision, this clarification, passed in the House of Representatives 424 to 5. It was overwhelming. It is the least we can do to give senior citizens the help they both desire and merit. Frankly, this kind of abuse that senior citizens have been subject to from the bureaucracy with regulations ought to end. We ought to have rules that a reasonable person can understand and deal with. What we have been subjected to in the existing regulations that have come down is flatly an effort to thwart the will of Congress, not an effort to deal reasonably with the problem.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.26826
VADER
-0.288
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.042753751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0234219551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0110449597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0052954401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016221997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007095309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001905188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001029918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.2857E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.33509E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5224E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Hank Brown
The reality is, we would not have this bill before us today if we had not had some Federal regulators that had simply tried to thwart the original intent of Congress. We would not have this bill before us if the bureaucrats had simply tried to deal with this problem in a way that was less cumbersome and less difficult.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.46634
VADER
0.016
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0075739401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054484117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0044391465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009458617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009266115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008606823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003982957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.73639E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.43741E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.20316E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.51823E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Hank Brown
I should point out that not only is this bill something that passed the House by 424 to 5, but reasonable efforts have been made in this Chamber to modify the bill to further obtain consensus. We have accepted suggestions made by Senator Simon and others which address their concerns. What comes out of committee and what is available for the Senate to consider, therefore, is a bill that I think Members will be comfortable in voting for and will feel they can report to their constituents: We have cleaned up the law, we have clarified the law, we have ended some unnecessary and unreasonable regulatory burdens and given a reasonable, clear definition to protect the interests of senior citizens.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.23676
VADER
0.921
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0177899608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036747948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032874337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014539943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011166968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006229692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003872221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003313497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002291195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001865253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.23017E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.01
Magnitude:
122
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38
Hank Brown
Mr. President, at this point I yield the floor and I suggest the absence of a quorum and ask unanimous consent that the time of the quorum call be charged equally to myself and the Senator from Delaware.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
1.438416075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0344474684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0078074023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0056226774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045173216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028657878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0027215108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015337804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007439988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003767024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.75571E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
68.378
Magnitude:
65
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2398454119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0289165298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074779455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0063770247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0044124725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022979953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022094251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0020407082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002388532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002070262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.62292E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.148
Magnitude:
53
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.8
Gunning-Fog Score
4.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Hank Brown
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0038205751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036982543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014246376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007097468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0003609865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003525386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001714836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001225052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.37629E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.83788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2155E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
89.288
Magnitude:
31
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.4623066634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1826762804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1453906414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.019662347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0195753077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095878895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033642449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020944532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012239335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.22384E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.04579E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Hank Brown
Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays on H.R. 660.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0652988558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0087089858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0031887768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0026460395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023736999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018978735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001310148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012536773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009842158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.30217E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.0372E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
96.949
Magnitude:
43
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.3
Coleman-Liau Index
0.4
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0334897079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0144491554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0129884473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0111491689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.011008326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0074034571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0047150665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0033572003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005722231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002318565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002237063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
29.264
Magnitude:
5
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.2
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
There appears to be a sufficient second.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.8123970591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0217574285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.015226574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0072351693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063702842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002003542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001553015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001351155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001124259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.36125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.9239E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
89.704
Magnitude:
40
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Hank Brown
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum and ask that the time under the quorum call be charged equally to both sides.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.202
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0020983958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001728307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012854305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008858884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007761213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006631748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001475112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.88524E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.57826E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.884E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.7703E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
96.628
Magnitude:
47
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0109438857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0100851626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0038097874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010233157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0006234524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000615702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.4132E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.79113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.5861E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.3089E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.105E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
95.949
Magnitude:
96
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
The clerk will call the roll.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0735251466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0687446853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.028683219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0234709791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0130741755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025985964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0023312063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016249944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004251227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002121567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001553117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
62.917
Magnitude:
79
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
21.327
Magnitude:
79
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Hank Brown
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0259825989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0104760926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015519263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011403516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009193032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000581516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003677232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001574049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.56864E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.452E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.834E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Hate
0.0260004192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0159436895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0106222942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030407142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0028020881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024107276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009634901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.54696E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.52893E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.79997E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.50811E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.126
Magnitude:
93
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Hank Brown
Mr. President, the point of this bill is to deal with a problem in seniors housing communities that is created up by the ludicrous HUD regulations which this Congress directed but which had earlier been rejected and the new ones which I think strain the imagination.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
-0.781
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.9844384156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.2580421744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.102095108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0636236975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0090552239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0071442038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046662914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039899172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023987064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014069436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001873815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
60.61
Magnitude:
67
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Housing
Score:
26.191
Magnitude:
67
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Hank Brown
The problem that the seniors housing exemption could only be allowed for facilities that were designed for the very wealthy. So we have a circumstance where, if you followed the existing HUD regulations, the rich could enjoy the exemption but the normal seniors could not.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.532
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1278070733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0240275811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0109422159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0058491558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028212329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023526129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019318511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014700505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0012082827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004089334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.21169E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
64.339
Magnitude:
37
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
21.09
Magnitude:
37
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Hank Brown
Let me, for those Members who find that hard to believe -- and I must say I find it hard to believe -- mention some of the standards that HUD put forward in regulations that they suggested seniors must have in order to qualify for the exemption:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
-0.202
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.044582042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.027337324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0191887259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0165841469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0053378917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019675366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0017427325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016211805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001152099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.78711E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.39205E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.085
Magnitude:
81
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Hank Brown
T'ai chi classes, swim therapy, macrame classes, fashion shows, regularly offered CPR classes, and vacation house watch.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0197510366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0061911771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0054069165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0052466225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029030045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001565828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001452331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001282984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.17029E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.54864E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.43586E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Health
Score:
90.128
Magnitude:
47
Code:
3
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#3
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Hank Brown
How many normal seniors do you know who have a need for that?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0250335404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0093478367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042754808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0039465576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017759588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014249625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006237658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.53414E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.45269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.14249E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.5988E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.103
Magnitude:
94
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Hank Brown
Pet therapy services.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
1.8450714648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1535260817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1179685234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0086912311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063364525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0047766207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0007787698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007048047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004552383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.3545E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.26136E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.21
Magnitude:
61
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
6.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Hank Brown
Are these things that you ought to have in a program to qualify for a normal exemption?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.055393111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0302838249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047023226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0040546875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026389556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019637218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007114389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.649E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.45269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.96182E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.35094E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
85.646
Magnitude:
77
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Hank Brown
Ping-pong, pool table, shuffleboard, horseshoe pits, golf courses.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0099913923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0095287258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009049561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049859773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032813074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012429808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006470771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.95325E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.57067E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.72044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.59054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.163
Magnitude:
35
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Hank Brown
These are things the average senior would find extravagant.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0106657768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0087388922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0058920785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0053517815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041722284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008600145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002127187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.0307E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.7372E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7796E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.781E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.06
Magnitude:
32
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Hank Brown
Lawyers' offices, lifeguards, swimming or water aerobic instructors, dance and exercise instructors, craft instructors.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0897878199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.053632725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0300466229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0272747362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0105432882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034810513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000458754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002733286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.53364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.87819E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.77193E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
92.289
Magnitude:
21
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.7
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Hank Brown
I mention these because they are in the HUD guidelines. I mention them also to make this point: HUD designed guidelines that, for the normal seniors in this country, became exorbitantly expensive, and it was part of an effort by HUD, I believe, to simply do away with the seniors exemption that would extend this housing privilege to normal seniors in this country.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.178
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1400088193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1328533981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0686891784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0358868128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0185532408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0107317326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0088964116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009500364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003113064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001134283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001011623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
96.107
Magnitude:
42
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Hank Brown
At this point, I yield 8 minutes of my time to the distinguished Senator from Arizona.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.381257385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0674651994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0308520393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0175567533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020456124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003796916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003178513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.02477E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.17627E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3964E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0819E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
96.813
Magnitude:
61
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Jon Kyl
I thank the Senator.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0760721741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0276786304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0143067125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0127650928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028059576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002378243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013234961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002233396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.45965E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.38761E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.09649E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
97.06
Magnitude:
52
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Jon Kyl
Mr. President, I certainly have been privileged to work with the Senator from Colorado in supporting this very important piece of legislation and would like to reiterate at the very outset precisely what we do here and why. This bill, as the Senator from Colorado has noted, eliminates many of the problems that senior communities have experienced over the last decade, and I think everyone recognizes that my State of Arizona was really a pioneer in the creation of these senior communities. They know who they are, and they do not need the Department of Housing and Urban Development designing a set of criteria such that the Senator from Colorado has just provided us with to define them as a senior community.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.375
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.375
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.7376
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1703666989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0740663672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.034146395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0146182676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0069644062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016542557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001336685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.19699E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.5422E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.7662E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.742E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
96.347
Magnitude:
101
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Jon Kyl
Believe me, if you go to Arizona and you are in one of these communities, you are fully aware that that is where you are. But under current law, these communities must follow these HUD guidelines or regulations in order to qualify for the exemption. The bill repeals this so-called significant facilities requirement, simplifying the process by which legitimate seniors-only facilities will gain the exemption.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
5.5584959686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1261358848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0891968957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.062053377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0345517939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036495345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004232942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003255401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002660867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.68296E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.30963E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
35.103
Magnitude:
37
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
26.4
Magnitude:
37
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Housing
Score:
22.357
Magnitude:
37
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39
Gunning-Fog Score
17.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Jon Kyl
To obtain the exemption, the bill only requires that 80 percent of the households in a community have in residence at least one person over the age of 55. That is the requirement.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0437480776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0259790308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0192722626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0083011917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0056392324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017338885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004533485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.86467E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.61216E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.92531E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.96169E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
63.52
Magnitude:
78
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Jon Kyl
If the community publicly states and can prove that 80 percent of its units have one or more occupants age 55 or older, then it would pass the adults-only housing test and qualify for an exemption from the Fair Housing Act's antifamily discrimination rule even if it lacked the significant facilities as defined by HUD.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0225376789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.020649076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0152581561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0061773244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047647874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019913117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003461534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.50492E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.17954E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.8649E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.098E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
88.651
Magnitude:
80
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
14
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Jon Kyl
In addition, to reduce abusive litigation, the bill allows that realtors and developers may show good-faith reliance on the seniors- only exemption if such person has no actual knowledge that the facility or community is not or will not be eligible for such an exemption, and the facility or community has stated formally in writing that the facility or community complies with the requirement for such exemption.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.31015
VADER
-0.802
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0329637871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0083553547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040771101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023618475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019339877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016601221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007072023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002905691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.88878E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.69042E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.00097E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
95.801
Magnitude:
74
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Jon Kyl
Now, who supports this legislation? Fortunately, just about everybody. I have received literally hundreds of letters of support from seniors living in these communities. Many of the community coordinators have expressed support to us. Due to HUD's stringent "significant facilities" regulations, it is the fact that a few of these communities have actually lost their seniors exemption.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.751
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0751820218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.048425881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0141257304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0098321914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0084756386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0035124496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0027096341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018837583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014688944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012136088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002099904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
94.321
Magnitude:
113
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Jon Kyl
Constituents from Mesa, Tucson, Golden Valley, Green Valley, Scottsdale, Sun City, Yuma, Dreamland Villa Community, and Phoenix have all communicated with me. Groups like the Arizona Association of Manufactured Homeowners and their 25,000 homeowners, Adult Action of Arizona and their 42,000 homeowners, Fountain of the Sun Homeowners, Arizona Manufactured Housing Institute, Sun Lakes Homeowners, Yuma East Owners Association, Ellenburg Capital Corp., and Fountains Retirement Properties, these and others have contacted me in support of this.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.5420967471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0170032334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0101492406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0071598632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0052512121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0042353058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009782194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008510932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004805958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000171521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.10799E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
93.963
Magnitude:
118
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
14.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Jon Kyl
Real estate agents -- the National Association of Realtors -- and housing development firms all favor this bill. AARP has written a letter to the chairman of the committee, Senator Hatch.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0643653446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0305366993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0224643925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.014104115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0066523076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0038064358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0027733184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001260891
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.06264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.01104E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.49186E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
75.888
Magnitude:
61
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Jon Kyl
I ask unanimous consent that the letter of the AARP in support of this legislation be printed in the Record at the conclusion of my remarks.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0276973209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0122287776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0086157517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035002249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027002396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004131902
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003138335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.05335E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.82719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.76558E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.8929E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
31.336799264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.7982476614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.4323749803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2078644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0644438784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0072556068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0036770241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009980316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009450376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001542221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.57154E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
56.159
Magnitude:
35
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Housing
Score:
20.321
Magnitude:
35
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
(See exhibit 1.)
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0115056297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0078896475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0075150318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042295629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032412219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0020119158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012407425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.64091E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.4333E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.3133E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.318E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
68.508
Magnitude:
61
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
3.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Jon Kyl
Many of these constituents argue that the rule defining "significant facilities and services" increases the costs to their housing and tells them how to live. And that is the objection I think in addition to the complexity of complying with these HUD regulations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
-0.153
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.2061615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0973912538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0300092332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.029055393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0253259932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0215675114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0062716121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0047301219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033570403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001075441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.25585E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Jon Kyl
These individuals have complained that some senior housing complexes are being hit with unfair discrimination lawsuits because of confusion about which housing qualifies for the exemption from the antidiscrimination housing statute.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.61904
VADER
-0.823
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0238362321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0214640357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0065403241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0060683797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053729415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009106986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003977938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003725964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.71981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.25619E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.423E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Jon Kyl
Why is this bill important?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.4590866622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1809160342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1447138609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0197124318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0193869389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0093675742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033450116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020349169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011974618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.06337E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.9441E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Jon Kyl
Although the "significant facilities and services" provision was well intended -- it was designed to protect families with children from discrimination in housing, which we all support, of course -- the exemption has made the lives of seniors unnecessarily difficult.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.691
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0188386926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0082511644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0081583945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0060646369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047512618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0042398482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010615232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000824467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006574639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.51997E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0759E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
23.62
Magnitude:
28
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
5.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Jon Kyl
Fewer regulations and restrictions would allow senior communities to operate more efficiently and freely. Is it too much to ask that the seniors of our country be allowed to live without intrusion into their lives by the Federal Government?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.794
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0151851185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0136732866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.012388904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063408654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049184029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009395048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002905148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002245677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001366223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.4099E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1592E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Jon Kyl
Most senior citizens I know are independent and highly capable. They do not want to pay extra to have somebody read to them. They do not want or need to be told by the Federal Government how often they have to have bingo made available to them in their housing complex.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.422
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0157078481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0101274883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004262364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000889331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00072431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006307268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002287219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002228834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.43155E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.15052E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.9973E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Jon Kyl
By increasing the price of rent in senior facilities, these regulations in effect discriminate against low-income seniors, as the Senator from Colorado has pointed out.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1871997607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0161056552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0103574726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0100727164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053384414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028897079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027519756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.58227E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.66516E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.44147E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4296E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
92.239
Magnitude:
51
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Jon Kyl
There is one other thing that I would like to say because there is an argument that the Housing and Urban Development Department recognized the problems with its regulations and therefore sought to relieve some of the burden by revising and imposing a new set of regulations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
15.9768253565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.064208312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0092141905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025837771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004785254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004222757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003101297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.3924E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3536E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.723E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.86E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
96.424
Magnitude:
80
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Jon Kyl
I almost did not use the word "imposing," but that is what it is. And I think the point of this legislation is to [[Page S 18066]] say, "Nice try, but you still have not solved the problem." This most recent rule of HUD revising the "significant facilities and services" regulation really does not answer the problem.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.61904
VADER
0.773
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
3.0661717057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1303387806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0332047901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0249913312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0182618751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036104422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001649665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.72662E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.14297E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.5018E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6676E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
86.841
Magnitude:
66
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Jon Kyl
One of my constituents, Susan Brenton, for the 25,000 Member Arizona Association of Manufactured Homeowners Group, stated, "The new rule is still very nebulous and leaves a lot of areas open to court decisions and each court case costs the residents of the community thousands of dollars." The new regulations state that communities that provide at least 2 services each from 5 of 12 categories all defined by HUD qualify for the exemption. But these services are really quite frivolous, and they raise the costs to residents. This is what the Senator from Colorado was just quoting from, Mr. President.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.37949
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
3.943990916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0623230881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0317163882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0074878641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0070832524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0044945609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021724312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.11839E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.35564E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.9543E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.8113E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
91.843
Magnitude:
94
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Jon Kyl
These so-called easier regulations are really at the end of the day not much of an improvement. HUD's attempt at revising its statistics have only trivialized what qualifies as a "significant service." Clearly, HUD needs some help in fixing the problem that it fully acknowledges exists -- regulatory overreach in senior housing -- but we think the way to solve the problem is to eliminate the "significant facilities and services" requirement altogether, and that is what H.R. 660 does.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.1431
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
59.3583643436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.2114428207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0799966161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0260556815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0031564039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011346984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001768125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.05515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.6247E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.2005E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.52697E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
90.243
Magnitude:
195
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Jon Kyl
Mr. President, in conclusion, this legislation has received not only wide support from States like mine which have a lot of senior communities, but as you know, it has wide support around the country. It has significant support in the Senate. It passed out of our Judiciary Committee with virtual unanimity, and I am sure it will be adopted by this body in very short order, again, with virtual unanimity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.914
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
19.582927227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0496682711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0334741315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0242764392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0116286792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017502007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015939022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0011440528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002816655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001127437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.54073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
70.524
Magnitude:
86
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Jon Kyl
What we will be saying to the senior communities of our country is that we heard you when you let us know that these regulations were too costly, too burdensome and really in a sense too frivolous, and therefore the Congress is not incapable of acting to correct a problem like this in order to make your lives a little easier. That is what we will have done when we pass this important legislation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.26826
VADER
-0.101
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0183426731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.008182376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0056323745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0047445519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045444391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033677788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017130838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002935863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000188018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001121367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.94847E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
30.672
Magnitude:
50
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
21.059
Magnitude:
50
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Jon Kyl
Again, I commend my colleague from the State of Colorado for bringing the legislation forth and for getting it to the floor so that we can see this job through and get it done before the end of the year.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1362642623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.008191901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0073118536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016609154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0009269659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001365555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.10228E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.73739E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.18612E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4031E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.365E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Agriculture
Score:
32.753
Magnitude:
35
Code:
4
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#4
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Jon Kyl
I thank the Chair very much and reserve the remainder of whatever time I did not use.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0104024191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0080863472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0027267792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017295171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013096373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005136878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001614079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001044269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.64651E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.74831E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3035E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
85.131
Magnitude:
35
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Kit Bond
Mr. President, I rise in support of H.R. 660, the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995. This legislation recognizes that elderly housing is special housing for seniors, that the elderly are a special population that deserve to live in housing reserved for the elderly, and that this legislation does not constitute discrimination against families.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
15.1650130749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.068651583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2885302994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1603796962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0982635422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0560491404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0448275416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.001852696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014454185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004166458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000151968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
69.316
Magnitude:
88
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Kit Bond
HUD recently published regulations to clarify what constitutes elderly housing. HUD published these regulations because the Congress in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 required HUD to clarify what constitutes elderly housing. I remind my colleagues that HUD has failed for years to provide the proper guidance and leadership on what constitutes elderly housing, despite confusion and costly litigation over this issue. Moreover, the new HUD regulations remain sorely lacking. It is time that we provide clear guidance on what constitutes elderly housing and I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 660.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.64663
VADER
0.17
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
73.1984198093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.5811291747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.3503574757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2371597104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0415484683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0114547809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004839487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001501094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.49814E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
5.9495E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.05232E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
68.95
Magnitude:
162
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
48
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Dianne Feinstein
Mr. President, I rise today in support of H.R. 660, the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995. The main thrust of this legislation is to remove the requirement for significant facilities at 55-and-over communities.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.542
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
0.2206285251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0939688238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0248519238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0088371904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053887205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027686703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.001499742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005774095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001432839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.56039E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7444E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Dianne Feinstein
This has been a major issue in California, particularly in the Inland Empire area including Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, which have traditionally been retirement communities catering to all income levels of seniors -- from low-income mobile home parks to lavishly planned, full service retirement communities. One only has to drive along Interstate 10, from Los Angeles to Phoenix, to see the many billboards advertising these retirement communities.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.31015
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
4.3324287981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0852100784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0663483283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0484015094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0062173938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0059267182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008948065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.7966E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.42524E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.9914E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.8099E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
95.877
Magnitude:
184
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
11.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Dianne Feinstein
Previously, these 55-and-over communities have been known as adults only communities. However, during consideration of the Fair Housing Amendments of 1988, in an attempt to combat discrimination against families with children, adults only communities were called into question.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
1.2063124217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.335440319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0633397955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0618342601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0354606862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0131537308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0085636566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0063662643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033739576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005001696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001453222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Dianne Feinstein
In turn, Congress decided to preserve adults only communities, which previously housed seniors, with the new designation of "55-and-over." One of the requirements for this designation was that communities must have "significant facilities" in order to qualify. The Department of Housing and Urban Development did not develop rules for "significant facilities," however, until 1991. Unfortunately, these rules proved to be very controversial and resulted in several expensive law suits being brought by HUD against the very communities Congress had intended to protect.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.187
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
57.3340594769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.4727735892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.167909509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0331449177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0134716291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0084304666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003728434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003569453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.06716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2618E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.5856E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
96.382
Magnitude:
87
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.4
Gunning-Fog Score
18.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Dianne Feinstein
The most controversial point had to do with the definition and differing interpretations by the courts and HUD as to what constituted "significant facilities." Did it mean that there had to be a 24-hour, on-site medical facility, for example, or, could shuffleboard or other planned activities suffice?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.068
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0372550101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0102719787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009456103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0076226606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002698834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014631538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007675228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001782541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001278859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.40867E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.606E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Dianne Feinstein
Last year, due partially to concerns expressed by my office, former Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Roberta Achtenberg conducted hearings around the country, including one in San Bernardino County. From what I understand, communities were pleased with the outcomes of the hearings, and eventually, HUD developed new rules which lessened the definition of "significant facilities." Still, cities have been anxious for Congress to adopt H.R. 660, to permanently eliminate the "significant facilities" requirement. Take for example, in my state of California, the city of Hemet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.852
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0442957622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0153793197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0081852952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.007604959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0068227208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0066362838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0026378688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016934959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011333045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.04202E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.42901E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.8
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
Dianne Feinstein
In the city of Hemet, 50 percent of its housing is 55-and-over communities. Removing the seniors-only status and requiring these communities to absorb families with children will result in a dramatic shortage of classroom space, and the tax-base. Demographics are such that the financing of new school construction, in a city that was planned as a retirement community, would not be possible.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0631667732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0210070284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0030277337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001350413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006779426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005966936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004819764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004299649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001752693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.37379E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.4255E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
94.188
Magnitude:
91
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Dianne Feinstein
Adoption of H.R. 660 will preserve existing 55-and-over communities, and will clarify, once and for all, congressional intent with respect to protecting senior housing in retirement communities. [[Page S 18067]] Although discrimination against families with children should not be tolerated, when a community has been planned specifically as a retirement community, and at least 80 percent of its residences house senior citizens, as this bill requires, then I believe those communities should have a right to be preserved as senior housing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.063986826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0108088825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0075215343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.006559812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0060091188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0046556197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010325816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008568756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003355322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000263666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.9427E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
49.652
Magnitude:
46
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
36.026
Magnitude:
46
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.4
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Lauch Faircloth
Mr. President, I strongly support H.R. 660. This legislation will eliminate many of the problems that senior communities have faced over the last several years, particularly from HUD's excessive rules interpreting the Fair Housing Act.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual > Minors
0.0097762939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0029199744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022481508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0004495635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001414229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001267168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001101528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.26982E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.22886E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.5244E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6008E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
86.009
Magnitude:
105
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Lauch Faircloth
Mr. President, unfortunately, this is not the only problem that arises from interpretations of the Fair Housing Act. In August of this year, I introduced legislation, S. 1132, to address two significant problems.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.8473
VADER
-0.129
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
2.0441826433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0387482607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0146322825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0087226581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0046345256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030828411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014297539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005627449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004162348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003446369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.07267E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
80.745
Magnitude:
105
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Lauch Faircloth
First, S. 1132, would prevent HUD from investigating and even suing people who protest the establishment of group homes in their communities.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.459
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0466391735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0121190758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098735509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0065062093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029365257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009531283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005573628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001527055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.47062E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.23197E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8614E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
79.936
Magnitude:
91
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Lauch Faircloth
S. 1132 would also overturn a recent Supreme Court ruling in City of Edmonds versus Oxford House, by allowing localities to zone limits on the number of unrelated persons living together if the zoning scheme is designed to preserve a single family neighborhood.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0041625193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029234961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024576104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014534923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008748815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008186113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000676372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003767915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003031314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001210137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.3042E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
78.464
Magnitude:
118
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Lauch Faircloth
In that case, a home for 10 to 12 recovering drug addicts and alcoholics was located in a single family neighborhood. The city tried to have the house removed because it violated the city's local zoning code that placed limits on the number of unrelated persons living together. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fair Housing Act was violated by this zoning law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
-0.153
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0575804967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0157365881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0129852153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0031977663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028054597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025100948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011612182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006729472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004211098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003397451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000155112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
95.133
Magnitude:
81
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Lauch Faircloth
I think the Supreme Court ruled incorrectly in this case. The Congress clearly intended an exemption from the Fair Housing Act regarding the number of unrelated occupants living together. My bill would clarify that localities can continue to zone certain areas as single family neighborhoods, by limiting the number of unrelated occupants living together. I think families should be able to live in neighborhoods without the threat that certain types of group homes -- which may be unsuitable for single family neighborhoods -- can move in next door and receive the protection of the Fair Housing Act.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.937
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1671000035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0076972392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030433048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020336829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0011847013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008775178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006921443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005004707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001508209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.0533E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.70447E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
96.687
Magnitude:
48
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.4
Gunning-Fog Score
18.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Lauch Faircloth
But the most important point is this one: Decisions about zoning should be made at the local level and not in Washington. If a locality wants to permit group homes in a certain area -- it can do so without HUD interfering in the decision using the Fair Housing Act as cover.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.667
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1000881079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0250388635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0135821945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0098922574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.009041281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005838729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037870141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005997246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001136914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.42136E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.18804E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
96.949
Magnitude:
184
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Lauch Faircloth
Mr. President, my bill would also correct the abuses of the Fair Housing Act by the Clinton administration. In the past 2 years, HUD has taken to investigating people under the Fair Housing Act who have protested group homes coming into their neighborhoods. The most well known of these cases was the incident involving three residents in Berkeley, CA. HUD's actions were a blatant violation of their right to freedom of speech. HUD's abuse was so bad that they dropped the suit and promised they wouldn't do it again. HUD even issued new guidelines on the subject so it couldn't happen again.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-3.04452
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.125
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.125
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.23639
VADER
0.042
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.009000858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0070022252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.004216603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031948399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028814798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028160503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0026811105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001132154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002785933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001353665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001030765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
67.07
Magnitude:
151
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
24.644
Magnitude:
151
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Lauch Faircloth
But, not long ago, HUD has done it again. HUD is investigating five Californians who went to court to get a restraining order against a group home for the developmentally disabled that was planned for their neighborhood.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0141196986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057767222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033286175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024084733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010670202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0010665411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004271787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001687535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.35086E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.03195E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5195E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Welfare
Score:
57.948
Magnitude:
51
Code:
13
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#13
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Housing
Score:
30.595
Magnitude:
51
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Lauch Faircloth
Mr. President, the issue is not whether the location for this group home is proper, that issue can be decided by the courts. The issue is freedom of speech. I believe anybody has the right to speak their mind and to take legal action against what they think is an injustice. HUD has taken the opposite view in this debate. I think this is wrong and needs to be clarified in law by amending the Fair Housing Act.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0719992211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.025811122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0219315698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034001463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033685435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017535489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001251286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008512118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002006833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.95512E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.48309E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
93.823
Magnitude:
54
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Lauch Faircloth
Mr. President, I offer strong support for H.R. 660, but would hope that in the near future, the Senate would consider other changes to the Fair Housing Act, particularly those in S. 1132. I hope that we can make these reforms to the Fair Housing Act because we need to preserve this act to prevent real discrimination, but we do not need to use the act to pursue a far, far left agenda that defies common sense, and silences free speech.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.969
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1344384626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0784735137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0201527102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0059042442
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029262634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012340892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002960605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001656733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001198451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001116557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.86968E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.4
Gunning-Fog Score
7.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
8.5
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Slade Gorton
Mr. President, today we passed a significant bill which will remove the burdensome bureaucracy of the Federal Housing and Urban Development Agency off the backs of American seniors. In this bill, which I originally introduced in the Senate during the 103d Congress, we take significant steps to provide fair, safe, and independent housing for Americans over the age of 55. I have received thousands of letters from concerned residents of "55 and over" communities in Washington.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0148625899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0078592129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0061642255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0056509085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0043718403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0035948648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026534484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015926486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003475198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002952366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.69371E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
79.721
Magnitude:
133
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Slade Gorton
Today, law provides for people over the age of 62 to be provided with special housing arrangements. The qualifications for a senior housing development are simple: A community for persons age 62 and older is required to have all residents age 62 or older. In 1988, Congress also legislated that communities with citizens 55 or older would qualify as "housing for older persons," provided those communities met three requirements: 80 percent of the housing units must be occupied by at least one person age 55 or older; a community must show in its advertising, rules, regulations and leases that it intends to serve people over the age of 55; and the community must provide "significant facilities and services" to its residents.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.542
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0233424129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0207371559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0110608118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0073362637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034749253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001097976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006661159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000210532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000108206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.89243E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.16685E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
95.297
Magnitude:
61
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Slade Gorton
It's those words: "Significant facilities and services" which have proven to be so problematic. HUD tried to tell us what "Significant facilities and services" meant -- it received over 15,000 comments, all expressing continued confusing and puzzlement over the Department's attempt at clarification. This is an area of law that is crying for legislative relief. I believe, as do my constituents, that the Department's rules go too far in mandating that all "55 and over" communities provide expensive facilities and services and make these services accessible to older persons. Clearly, Mr. President, privately owned and operated "55 and over" communities catering to low- and moderate-income seniors cannot be expected to have the same facilities and services as federally funded housing projects.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.1
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.1
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.19106
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0118322998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.006611037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054252519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0048946811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020749087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011560889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006916309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000169616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.97075E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.32936E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.6472E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Housing
Score:
87.487
Magnitude:
131
Code:
14
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#14
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
46
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44
Slade Gorton
Seniors of all incomes deserve protection. As noted in the Senate report to H.R. 660, "poorly drafted regulations have discouraged or outright denied seniors housing." With the overwhelming passage of H.R. 660, the U.S. Senate has stopped this practice. The U.S. Senate took a stand on behalf of our seniors, and their right to fair, safe, and equitable housing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0581612287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0332833588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0175720939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0137115043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0078703197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0061288047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009767699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003735054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.02155E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.1464E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.32E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.6
Gunning-Fog Score
6.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
2.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Hank Brown
Mr. President, let me repeat what is at issue.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1588373212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0628296984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0221269918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0062144769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047740432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010220312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004817274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004063985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003047081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.83452E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.0301E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
28.442
Magnitude:
6
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
89.5
Gunning-Fog Score
1.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Hank Brown
The way the HUD rules operate is that senior citizens are not allowed to have a community by themselves unless they had some facilities that were laid out by HUD, and they were things like access to swimming pools, accessible club house, private fishing pond, a hair salon, a golf course, lawyer's office, a vacation house watch, pet therapy services, tool loan services, regularly offered CPR classes, fashion shows, craft classes in making jewelry, a variety of classes including t'ai chi or swimming therapy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.54654
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0729130057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0299580075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0266699266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0202878029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0111186564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0077617042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0049022343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011570429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0010104702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006363882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.56639E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37
Hank Brown
What they came up with in the HUD rules was a flat rule that said if you are not rich and cannot afford these extraordinary services, we are not going to let you live together.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.193
Leans Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0186226651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.013008267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0094514609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011951322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011695814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003820737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002772738
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001219983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7946E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.22E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Hank Brown
Mr. President, that is not right. Seniors in this country deserve an opportunity to have reasonable rules. That is what this bill does. It has reasonable regulations, and it is a reasonable guideline that repeals some very unreasonable regulations. It has the overwhelming support of seniors around this country, the overwhelming support of the House. And I strongly urge its adoption.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.852
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2332296222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0990275294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0311528973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0175176407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0156932962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0042384898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018670504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017608685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003384783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.74054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9024E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Hank Brown
Mr. President, we are now at a point where the proponents of the bill have used much of their time. I suggest the absence of a quorum and ask that the time that is consumed in the quorum call be equally divided, except that at least 5 minutes remain usable at the end of the debate for the proponents of the bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1354028238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0328353461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0052370291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0047054902
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034273653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032658139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015210337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007422689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.07269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.90184E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6259E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0618509715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0322143693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0241523448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0158245835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0114855044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001575402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011135118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0007400382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002731986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001554224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.14702E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72
Gunning-Fog Score
4.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Joe Biden
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0281480141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049759215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030598985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011615869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008915449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000124149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.56624E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.6372E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.306E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.63E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0355545373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0149435044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0132297195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0093647701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049510196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0047308662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009139883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001225365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.08826E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.07869E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3867E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Joe Biden
Mr. President, parliamentary inquiry. I wish to speak in [[Page S 18068]] opposition to this bill. Is there time for me to do that? And under whose control is the time?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.47
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0304676592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0172262153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0143957557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095164847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041444258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021746058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004781244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004678856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003763006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.86527E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.43743E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
7.7
Automated Readability Index
0.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0256085274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0225597367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0058756996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.005353149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0052298132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009271074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003262652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003252298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.22694E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.5544E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.984E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.8
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Joe Biden
I thank the Chair very much.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Joe Biden
Mr. President, this bill, in my view, retreats from the commitment we made to families with children. In 1988, Congress said that America's housing providers should not be able to discriminate against families with children. We did this in the face of widespread evidence that such discrimination against families with children existed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Joe Biden
We spent a lot of time on this floor -- and I participated and have for the years I have been here -- talking about discrimination against minorities, talking about discrimination against the elderly, talking about all forms of discrimination, as we should, as we should. But in my view, we spent precious little time on this floor talking about what is a mounting form of discrimination, discrimination against children, because some people find them inconvenient, inconvenient to be around.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-2.94444
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Joe Biden
In 1988, Congress said that America's housing providers should not be able to discriminate against children as well as against blacks or Hispanics or people based on their religion or based on their gender. We took this action because we wanted to prohibit all-adult housing communities just as we had prohibited all-white housing communities in 1968 with the passage of the Fair Housing Act in the first place.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Joe Biden
Even as we said no discriminating against families, we also carved out an exception for legitimate retirement communities which catered to the special needs -- not just desires, needs -- and requirements of the elderly. The distinction we made then, and which I stand by now, is this: You cannot just keep children out because you do not like them, you cannot just keep children out because you do not want tricycles around, you cannot just keep children out and families with children out because it is inconvenient and you do not like it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16705
VADER
-0.434
Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Joe Biden
If you are going to exclude children, we said, you must be an organized community providing "significant facilities and services" designed to meet the physical and social needs of the elderly. Or put another way, a lot of old folks like me -- I am 53 now -- get together and say, "We're tired of having kids around and we're going to have this gated community that X percent of us are over the age of 50, and we can prevent someone from moving in who has kids." Well, I tell you what, I think that -- and by the way, there was ample evidence in the hearings we held then that that is just what was being done. What we were not concerned about is a community for the elderly with special needs where they needed ramps, where they needed special dining facilities, where there was some type of extended care, where it was in fact designed for elderly persons who in fact physically needed this special circumstance or emotionally needed this special circumstance, but not just because all of a sudden we have become trendy and decided that kids are kind of in the way.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.12
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.12
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.2318
VADER
0.631
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38
Joe Biden
If we are going to exclude children, we said, you have to be an organized community providing significant facilities and services. This "significant facilities and service" requirement was put into law for, as I have said, a very good reason, put there to distinguish between true senior communities and those that just think children are a pain in the neck. We recognized that something other than an animus against children must set these communities apart in order to meet an exemption from the Fair Housing Act.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.93827
VADER
0.687
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Joe Biden
I understand that what constitutes significant facilities and services has been a matter of a great deal of controversy and uncertainty over the years, and I have not been satisfied, because I have not believed that we set down stringent enough requirements to exclude -- exclude -- families with children.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.07
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
15.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Joe Biden
Heck, there are communities who let dogs in, let people have dogs, but will not let people have children. And so, significant facilities and services, as I indicated, have been a matter of much controversy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.20067
VADER
0.039
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Joe Biden
Also understand, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has taken many different stabs at the definition which has led to confusion and has made it difficult for those trying to comply with the law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
-0.765
Very Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Joe Biden
Mr. President, none of that, in my view, should lead us to abandon the basic principle: If you are going to be able to discriminate against families, you should be special, you should be serving the special needs of seniors. This principle should remain our guidepost more now than ever, especially since the Department of Housing and Urban Development has just recently promulgated completely revised regulations which resolve the confusion and make it much easier and clearer for senior housing communities to take advantage of the exemption.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
0.772
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Joe Biden
The Department, many now agree, has finally gotten it right. Under the new regulations, which went into effect September 18 of this year, a housing facility can self-certify. It is amazing, we do not let many other folks self-certify that it falls under the Fair Housing Act exemption by simply filling out a straightforward, easy-to-understand checklist of facilities and services designed for older folks, which, I add, I do think is too lenient, not too strong. My staff does not like me to say that, but that is what I think. I think it should be more stringent, if you are a senior community meeting the exemption.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.64663
VADER
0.585
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.8
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Joe Biden
But the checklist contains a menu of some 114 facilities and services in 11 categories. If a facility provides a mere 10 of them, like wheelchair accessibility, communal recreation facilities, periodic vision or hearing tests or fellowship meetings, it qualifies as a senior housing project and may exclude families with children.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Joe Biden
I want to make it clear to seniors who are not happy with me about this, I do not even think that is stringent enough, but at least it attempts to make the distinction.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.142
Leans Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.8
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Joe Biden
If a facility's status is challenged, it need only show that the certification was accurate at the time of the alleged violation. The list of facilities and services included in the new rule was drawn from amenities actually provided by a wide cross-section of senior housing developments across the country, large and small, affluent and less well off, manufactured housing communities, condominiums and single- family communities.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.1431
VADER
-0.414
Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
12.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Joe Biden
In testimony before Senator Brown's subcommittee, a representative from the Department of Housing and Urban Development testified to the extreme flexibility and cost consciousness built into the new guidelines. Here is what he said, and I quote:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Joe Biden
Let me add, I think it should require those things. But they may be provided by staff, volunteers, including residents and neighbors, or by third parties, such as civic groups or existing organizations in the community.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.402
Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Joe Biden
The new regulation does not require lavish services, nor do the mandated facilities, affordable only by the well-heeled; rather, they simply embody what is already being offered by bona fide senior communities of all sorts across the map. If a facility is providing at least 10 of the 114 facilities or services on the list, it qualifies for an exemption, a self-designated exemption.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Joe Biden
The bill's supporters say the bill will make it easier and surer for a housing community to determine whether it qualifies for a fair housing exemption, and they are absolutely right about that. It makes it a lot easier. They do not have to be a senior facility. They can just not like kids. They can just not like kids around.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.879
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Joe Biden
What kind of message are we sending to families with children, most of whom are breaking their necks just making it? What are we saying? We want to make it easier for you to have a rationale to keep me out of that community with my 14-year-old daughter?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.563
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Joe Biden
I think it is outrageous -- I acknowledge, I am the only one who seems upset about this; no one else is here to speak against it, that I am aware of -- unless they want to make it even easier and just say it is not in vogue to have kids: "If you have kids, go off and [[Page S 18069]] live by yourself." The other folks should go off and live by themselves, and if the kids want to follow, so be it. Think about it for a minute.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13
Coleman-Liau Index
5
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Joe Biden
Let us say that a complex contains 100 units; that all of these are occupied by two people; and that 80 percent are occupied by at least one person over the age of 55. In this hypothetical community, it will be able to lawfully discriminate against families with children under this bill if as few as 80 residents of the 200 of them are over the age of 55, while 120 could be under the age of 55, and we could put up a sign: "No children allowed." They probably all call themselves great Americans, too, by the way. They all talk about how they care about families, and they may even go visit their grandchildren and pat them on the head on their birthdays and Christmas. What does that say, if you can build a community where 80 out of 200 people living in the community are over 55 and you can say "no kids"? If we want population control, this may be one of the indirect ways of going at it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Joe Biden
To my mind, the math just does not add up to fairness for families and children. I believe this bill will open the door to the very kind of discrimination we sought to outlaw in 1988, and I think it will make it just too easy for folks to hang a sign on the door that just says, "No children allowed." I cannot support this bill. I urge my colleagues not to support this bill. I realize that I am going to hear an awful lot from senior citizens about their rights. I do not think there is anybody on this floor who votes to protect the rights of seniors any more than I do, but no senior, unless they have a physical or emotional problem and need, has a right to tell a kid they cannot live next door. It is just too darn bad, and we are allowing it here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.3913
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.3913
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
-0.89
Very Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Joe Biden
I might add -- well, I will not add anything else, because I will just get myself in trouble if I keep thinking about it and keep talking about it. I do not think this is the right thing to do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.153
Leans Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
5.8
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Joe Biden
I am sure to most, because we are so busy, this is just a clarification of an existing piece of legislation. That is how it is advertised. I respect my colleague from Colorado. He is joined in support for this by many of the strongest allies in the area of civil rights, many of the colleagues on this floor, my colleagues who I tried rally a little bit about this. They seem to think I am kind of off. One of them even said, "Biden, that's because you come from a big Catholic family, you keep talking about the size of families." I do not like people who discriminate against kids. Period. I think it is well-intended what is being done here, but I want to tell you, if you are 55 years old, ambulatory, still working, have no problem, live at home, have a wife or have a husband, you are hanging around the house, and you are fine and you do not have any special needs, you should not be able to say a kid cannot move next door to you. Period. Period.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36364
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36364
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.72594
VADER
-0.043
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
10.2
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Joe Biden
I just think this is wrong. I think it is dead wrong. But I am going to lose. I just want to make sure when my children and grandchildren read this, they will know their old man and their grandfather meant what he said.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
-0.818
Very Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Joe Biden
The only important thing -- the only important thing -- in this whole outfit is kids. That is the only important thing. All the rest is insignificant. And when we allow people to say, "No kids here," it is like we say, "No dogs here," it is like we say, "No blacks here." That is just wrong, unless there is a real good and compelling reason for it. The fact you are over 55 and 80 out of 200 people in a community over 55, that "ain't" good enough for me.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.349
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Joe Biden
I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Abraham). Who yields time?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Hank Brown
Mr. President, I yield myself 2 minutes. I want to pay tribute to my very thoughtful colleague from Delaware. His comments are heartfelt, and I know he is very sincere. I know his concerns come from a genuine interest in seeing that the irrationality of discrimination does not pervade our society, and that we evaluate and work with each other on the basis of reasonableness, thoughtfulness and caring. I want to pay tribute to him because I have a great deal of respect for him and what brings him to his position.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.00148
VADER
0.971
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Hank Brown
I am persuaded that this is a good bill for a couple of reasons. One, I believe seniors, who have reached that stage in life where they need to be in a safe, supportive environment, should be allowed that opportunity. That is what the bill does.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.807
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Hank Brown
Second, Mr. President, I am persuaded that the guidelines that HUD came up with are simply an attempt to make it impossible to make this exemption for seniors housing work, not reasonable attempts at regulation. After two administrations, three attempts at regulations, four Congresses, specific Federal legislation directing HUD to fix this, countless lawsuits, numerous hearings and policy decisions, a record number of constituent letters to agencies, the fact is that we ought to act and make it possible for seniors to have units by themselves, if they wish it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.459
Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Hank Brown
Mr. President, let me make two observations. One, nobody who wants to be around kids, by this measure, is precluded from being around kids. It does not do that. It also ought to be noted, Mr. President, that when you have senior housing and seniors sell their home and move into the senior housing, it makes available additional units to families who have children. We ought to ask ourselves: where did the senior who moves into a seniors community come from? Certainly they are vacating other housing. So the process of senior housing is one that adds units for family units, not subtracts from it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Hank Brown
Last, Mr. President, I think any objective observer would look at the guidelines that have come out from HUD and understand they have simply not served the American people. To suggest that to have senior housing units, you have to have to have access to swimming pools or hair salons, or access to a clubhouse, or life guards, or exercise instructors, or crafts instructors, or golf courses, or a lawyer's office, or polka and ballroom dancing instructors, or fashion shows, is simply to recognize what they have done with these regulations. They have said that you have to be rich to qualify for senior housing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Hank Brown
Mr. President, the reality is this: The majority of Americans who retire do not have a lot of extra money and a lot of them cannot afford these things. What we have done is come up with HUD regulations that are reserved for the very rich, and that is silly and wrong, and it ought to be corrected. This bill does that. This bill is about expanding freedom, about giving seniors choices. I think it is a wise measure. It is why the House passed it by such an overwhelming margin.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.89
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
4.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Hank Brown
A concern that has been raised about H.R. 660 is whether it requires a seniors community to be intended for 100 percent occupancy by people over the age of 55. Section 807 (b)(2)(C) states that the housing is "intended and operated for occupancy by persons 55 years of age or older." The congressional intent of this provision is simply that the main purpose behind creating the community is to provide housing for older persons. Any suggestion that this requires the community to intend that 100 percent of the units be occupied by those 55 and older is a grave misconception. the true meaning behind this general statement is evident in the bill's language, the legislative history, the subcommittee report, and current Federal regulations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
Hank Brown
This legislation will not require all units in a seniors community to be intended for use by persons over the age of 55. The bill language makes it obvious exactly when counting occupancy is critical. The bright-line standard it creates clears up any confusion in determining what constitutes seniors housing: At least 80 percent of the occupied units are occupied by at least 1 person who is 55 years of age or older -- not 100 percent and not total units -- 80 percent of occupied units.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
-0.273
Slightly Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Hank Brown
But the general purpose of the community, as outlined by the section in question, is to provide housing for older persons -- and the definition of what constitutes housing for older persons is that 80 percent of the occupied units are occupied by persons 55 years of age and older.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Hank Brown
The language of the bill is clear on this point, and so is the legislative history. In 1988, Congress extended the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination in housing against families with children. At the same time, however, Congress provided for the exemption of three different types of seniors housing, including the one we are examining today; that is, housing "intended or operated for occupancy by at least one [[Page S 18070]] person 55 years of age or older per unit." The fact that H.R. 660 does not require 100 percent occupancy for housing of persons 55 and older becomes even more evident when one compares this category of seniors housing with another one of the three original exemptions. The second category is "housing intended for, and solely occupied by, persons 62 years of age or older." Note the striking difference, besides age, between these two categories: The one we are concerned with today no where states that housing is to be solely occupied by persons 55 years of age and older. Yet if this was the congressional intent, certainly it would have been delineated in 1988 when the three categories were first introduced.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.38462
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.38462
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.74721
VADER
0.751
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
51
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41
Hank Brown
The subcommittee report also promotes this interpretation. In the section-by-section analysis, the provision in question is interpreted so that "the housing provider can demonstrate its intent to providing housing for persons 55 years or older, even if it allows persons under age 55 to continue to occupy dwelling units or move into the housing facility and occupy dwelling units, as long as the housing facility maintains the 80 percent occupancy threshold." The congressional intent voiced throughout the legislative history and subcommittee report is to make it easier for seniors communities to qualify as housing for older persons, thereby making seniors housing, particularly lower income seniors housing, more affordable. Requiring 100 percent of the units in a community, occupied or not, to be intended only for persons age 55 and older does not accomplish this goal -- in fact, it makes qualifying as seniors housing more burdensome and would further restrict the availability of affordable seniors housing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
-0.503
Very Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
67
Sprache Difficult Word Count
50
Hank Brown
What Congress does intend is to create a 20-percent buffer zone for seniors communities so that they can more easily qualify, and remain qualified, as housing for older persons. It is easy to predict several situations that could arise making this buffer zone a necessary and vital protection for seniors housing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.834
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Hank Brown
Suppose an elderly woman owns a condominium in a seniors housing community. When this woman passes away, she wants to leave the home to her middle-aged son. Inheritance and transfer of property are an everyday occurrence in our democratic society, and the 20-percent buffer zone outlined in H.R. 660 would accommodate such a bequest.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
-0.052
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
6.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Hank Brown
Or consider the widow of a senior citizen who has passed away. If the surviving spouse is younger than 62 or 55, then, without H.R. 660, they face not losing a loved one, but also having to move out of their own home. This is not the role of the Federal Government. H.R. 660 corrects this.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.105
Leans Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91.5
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
5.7
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Hank Brown
The possible scenarios that affect seniors housing go even further -- to potentially threatening the very existence of seniors communities. If a seniors apartment complex has 100 rooms available but can only find enough interested seniors to occupy 90 of them, this bill would permit the remaining 10 rooms to be occupied by families or other people under age 55. Forcing the communities to leave these 10 apartments vacant because seniors were not available could threaten the economic viability of running a seniors community. H.R. 660 protects seniors from that risk.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.375
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.375
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.7376
VADER
0.468
Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Hank Brown
Current Federal regulations also support the fact that housing "intended and operated for occupancy by persons age 55 and older" does not mean 100 percent occupancy is required. Current regulations require similar intent as what is proposed in H.R. 660. In regard to housing for persons 55 and over, it states that the owner or manager of a seniors community must "publish and adhere to policies and procedures which demonstrate an intent to provide housing for persons 55 years of age or older." Not at any time has HUD interpreted this to mean 100 percent occupancy by seniors. This is a general statement requiring that the main purpose behind the housing facility is to provide housing for seniors. No specific or numerical requirements are prescribed, just that the goal of their venture is to make seniors housing available.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.21888
VADER
0.128
Leans Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
53
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
Hank Brown
A specific, numerical requirement is prescribed in this bill, but you won't find it before the bright-line test in section 807(b)(2)(C)(i). This bright-line standard is the force of H.R. 660, replacing the ambiguous "significant facilities and services" requirement that currently exists. But nothing else in this language prescribes any occupancy requirements beyond the bright-line standard of 80 percent actual occupancy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Hank Brown
Nothing in the legislative history, congressional intent, current CFR's, or language of this bill requires seniors communities to have the intent to occupy 100 percent of their housing units with persons 55 years of age and older. There is a well-thought and intentional 20 percent buffer zone to protect seniors communities and ensure they are effective, not unduly burdened, and able to provide the best services to our most valued citizens at the most affordable cost. The bright- line standard and everything surrounding this bill make that clear. Do not be misguided by inaccurate and hasty fears. H.R. 660 does not require the intention of 100 percent occupancy, but rather the clear, understandable condition that to be considered housing for older persons, 80 percent of the occupied units must be occupied by persons age 55 and older.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.916
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
45
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44
Hank Brown
Mr. President, I believe this completes all the arguments. I ask unanimous consent that all time be yielded back.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.202
Slightly Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.6
Gunning-Fog Score
7.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Without objection, it is so ordered.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.7
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.052
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
The committee amendment was agreed to.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
The amendment was ordered to be engrossed, and the bill to read the third time.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
90.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
The bill was read the third time.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.9
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The yeas and nays have been ordered.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The clerk will call the roll.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Trent Lott
I announce that the Senator from North Carolina [Mr. Faircloth] is necessarily absent.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Wendell Ford
I announce that the Senator from New Jersey [Mr. Bradley] is necessarily absent.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.7
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Thad Cochran
Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote, and I move to lay that motion on the table.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.9
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.4
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Thad Cochran
The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.7
Gunning-Fog Score
4
Coleman-Liau Index
4.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Bob Smith
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.1
Gunning-Fog Score
1.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.1
Gunning-Fog Score
1.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Bob Smith
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4