Fact
ba
.
se
Senate Floor: CAMPAIGN FINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION
Topics
Entities
Moderation
15 Speakers
Topics
No topics found
Entities
No entities found
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Ernest Hollings Ernest Hollings said 845 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
33%
Ernest Hollings said 12225 words of a total of 42804 words.
29%
Pete Domenici Pete Domenici said 297 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
12%
Pete Domenici said 5617 words of a total of 42804 words.
14%
Joe Biden Joe Biden said 314 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
13%
Joe Biden said 5517 words of a total of 42804 words.
13%
Harry Reid Harry Reid said 220 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
9%
Harry Reid said 3309 words of a total of 42804 words.
8%
Arlen Specter Arlen Specter said 157 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
7%
Arlen Specter said 2835 words of a total of 42804 words.
7%
John McCain John McCain said 157 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
7%
John McCain said 2626 words of a total of 42804 words.
7%
Russ Feingold Russ Feingold said 134 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
6%
Russ Feingold said 2385 words of a total of 42804 words.
6%
Slade Gorton Slade Gorton said 98 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
4%
Slade Gorton said 2346 words of a total of 42804 words.
6%
Mitch McConnell Mitch McConnell said 101 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
4%
Mitch McConnell said 1957 words of a total of 42804 words.
5%
Jack Reed Jack Reed said 89 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
4%
Jack Reed said 1518 words of a total of 42804 words.
4%
Jeff Sessions Jeff Sessions said 50 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
2%
Jeff Sessions said 910 words of a total of 42804 words.
3%
Kay Bailey Hutchison Kay Bailey Hutchison said 39 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
2%
Kay Bailey Hutchison said 850 words of a total of 42804 words.
2%
Ted Kennedy Ted Kennedy said 24 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
1%
Ted Kennedy said 422 words of a total of 42804 words.
1%
The Presiding Officer The Presiding Officer said 42 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
2%
The Presiding Officer said 186 words of a total of 42804 words.
1%
Chuck Grassley Chuck Grassley said 8 sentences of a total of 2590 sentences.
1%
Chuck Grassley said 46 words of a total of 42804 words.
1%
Full Transcript
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0825281895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0326984911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0197634319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0141167897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0136219751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0125837963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0077077209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005092185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004398914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.12281E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.5873E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.7
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0079035999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0074874712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028784942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028701668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013560797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010854193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000350014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.93491E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.05135E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.18898E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.0868E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
43.264
Magnitude:
65
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.19
Magnitude:
65
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Russ Feingold
I rise today to oppose the proposed constitutional amendment offered by the junior Senator from South Carolina and the senior Senator from Pennsylvania.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0695331488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0149612984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00743704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040123108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0037388254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017569719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009192262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.91167E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.99587E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8606E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.399E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
46.874
Magnitude:
73
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
3.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, first I would like to say a few words about the Senator from South Carolina. Our colleague, Senator Hollings, has been calling for meaningful campaign finance reform for perhaps longer than any other Member of the U.S. Senate. I disagree with this particular approach. But I certainly do not question his sincerity or commitment to reform.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0593535311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0520009198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0083489431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0074625721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016483456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015669184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006661598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001136762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6414E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6063E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.47E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
38.531
Magnitude:
58
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
24.216
Magnitude:
58
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.2
Gunning-Fog Score
7.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, when the U.S. Senate last had an extended debate on the issue of campaign finance reform back in 1993, the junior Senator from South Carolina offered a sense-of-the-Senate amendment to take up a constitutional amendment very similar to the one that is before us today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0969719142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0314839621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0206242068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0055845285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024448354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002813747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.26101E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.92288E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.47772E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.13988E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.915E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
66.394
Magnitude:
100
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Russ Feingold
I remember we had a very short period of time before that vote came up, and I made a decision and I voted with the Senator from South Carolina on that day. I did so because I believed that other than balancing the Federal budget, there was perhaps no more fundamental issue facing our country than the need to reform our election laws.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0291255914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0110460765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0099103105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023267286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007440052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004831712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001843394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001135395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.68073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.3068E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2552E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
81.137
Magnitude:
92
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Russ Feingold
Such a serious topic I believed at the time merited at least a consideration of a constitutional amendment. And I will confess to a certain level of frustration at that time with the fact that the Senate and the other body had not yet acted to pass meaningful campaign finance reform in that Congress.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0856256753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0682547456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0417886011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040945619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0036317066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005933043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002479681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.44498E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.71345E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.43545E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.0506E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
29.881
Magnitude:
79
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
28.27
Magnitude:
79
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
23.013
Magnitude:
79
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Russ Feingold
But, Mr. President, to be candid, I immediately realized, even as I was returning to my office, that that might not have been the best vote I ever cast. I started rethinking right away whether I really wanted the U.S. Senate to seriously consider amending the first amendment to address even this subject of which I and so many other Americans feel passionately about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1330252155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0112521288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0103197337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0045166882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007905967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007876137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001664652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001608039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.53306E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.92089E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.59256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
74.571
Magnitude:
54
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
6.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Russ Feingold
Then, 18 months later, my perspective on this question began to change even more as I was presented with two new developments here in the U.S. Senate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.009459359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0075655953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028316748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001761547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003021506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001739639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.32812E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.88273E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.0921E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4408E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2545E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
32.403
Magnitude:
155
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
29.657
Magnitude:
155
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Russ Feingold
First, I was given the privilege of serving on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and, second, I would soon learn that the new 104th Congress was to become the engine for a trainload of proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution. As a member of the Judiciary Committee, I had a very good seat to witness first hand what was being attempted here with regard to the basic document of our country, the Constitution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.834
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0264005153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0199069589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0147871877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0053732387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016872236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002881446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.6388E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.99646E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.3766E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.94899E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.2255E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
85.42
Magnitude:
45
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Russ Feingold
It started with a proposal right away for a balanced budget constitutional amendment, and we were considering a term limits constitutional amendment, and then a flag desecration constitutional amendment, then a school prayer amendment, then a supermajority tax increase amendment, and then a victims rights amendment. In all, Mr. President, 135 constitutional amendments were introduced in the last Congress.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2088114386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0446015503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0318407576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0114881106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0079090292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040489187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005839712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003279272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002396267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.85094E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.80933E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
56.1
Magnitude:
70
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
International Affairs
Score:
20.037
Magnitude:
70
Code:
19
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#19
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.8
Gunning-Fog Score
18.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Russ Feingold
As I saw legislator after legislator suggest that every social, economic, and political problem we have in this country could be solved merely with enactment of a constitutional amendment, I chose to strongly oppose not only this constitutional amendment but others that also sought to undermine our most treasured founding principle. I firmly believe we must continue this reflective practice of attempting to cure each and every political and social ill of our Nation by tampering with the U.S. Constitution. Mr. President, the Constitution of this country was not a rough draft. We must stop treating it as such.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
-0.413
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0569904107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0295991835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0080824153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0047710804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038969407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013884642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005149527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001838329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.66134E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.1666E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7142E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
88.75
Magnitude:
80
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.8
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Russ Feingold
I want to say, because the Senator from South Carolina has just arrived and I know that he is not one who has engaged in such an attitude toward the Constitution, I know very well he only makes a proposal like this with the most serious consideration and for the goal of trying to do something about campaign spending. What I am addressing here, what I saw in the last Congress was a wholesale attempt to try to amend what seemed to be almost virtually every part of the U.S. Constitution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.5711609963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1232632669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1187865855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0047849597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034962384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033241795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001162479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009784471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.31162E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.2725E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0316E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
80.952
Magnitude:
78
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Russ Feingold
We must also understand that even if this constitutional amendment were to pass this body today, which it will not, but even if it did, it would not take us one single, solitary step closer to campaign finance reform. It is not a silver bullet. This constitutional amendment merely empowers the Congress to set mandatory spending limits on congressional candidates. Those are the same kind of mandatory limits that were struck down in the landmark Buckley versus Valeo decision.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.518
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1125272363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0748884631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0223190669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051651965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018127934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007314186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003135514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001086032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.84585E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.91572E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.57579E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
International Affairs
Score:
26.278
Magnitude:
113
Code:
19
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#19
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
20.991
Magnitude:
113
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Russ Feingold
Here is the question I pose for supporters of this amendment: If this constitutional amendment were to pass the Congress and be ratified by the States, would campaign finance reformers have the necessary 51 votes -- or more likely what would be required would be 60 votes -- to pass legislation that included mandatory spending limits?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0330555224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0315136625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0061598359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041039755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026503252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012763315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002709528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.15034E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.80156E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.64558E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.1563E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
50.224
Magnitude:
132
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, in January I joined the senior Senator from Arizona in introducing the first bipartisan campaign finance reform proposal in over a decade. That proposal, unlike the law that was considered in Buckley versus Valeo, includes voluntary spending limits. That is to say, Mr. President, we offer incentives in the form of free and discounted television time to encourage but not require candidates to limit their campaign spending. When the Senator from Arizona and I bring that legislation to the floor of the Senate, I have no doubt that we will be met with strong resistance from a number of Senators. So the notion that this constitutional amendment will somehow magically pave the way for legislation that includes mandatory spending limits simply ignores the reality of the opposition that campaign finance reformers face here in the Senate and I think would face in the Senate at the time of ratification of any such amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.06667
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.06667
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.12516
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0312465039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0255479012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0037361202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019284369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008696607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003014084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002596669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001139443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.77173E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.6193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8397E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
42.511
Magnitude:
183
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
40.106
Magnitude:
183
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
62
Sprache Difficult Word Count
49
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, this amendment certainly, if ratified, would remove the obstacle of the Supreme Court. But it will not remove the obstacle of those Senators such as the junior Senator from Kentucky who believe that we need more money, not less, in our political system.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.484
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.024303906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0067353853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0058906509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012434587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004976725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.40121E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.54348E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.0937E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.1885E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.1561E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.3967E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
47.073
Magnitude:
125
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Russ Feingold
Most disconcerting to me, Mr. President, is what this proposed constitutional amendment would mean to the first amendment. I find nothing more sacred and treasured in our Nation's history than the first amendment. It is perhaps the one tenet of our Constitution that sets our country apart from every mold of government form and tested by mankind throughout history. No other country has a provision quite like the first amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.666
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.074179034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0355166791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0042066345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020348101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004505198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004071391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001867428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001349233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.32108E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.12188E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.17738E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
63.808
Magnitude:
85
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Russ Feingold
The first amendment is the bedrock of the Bill of Rights. It has as its underpinnings the notion that each individual has a natural and fundamental right to disagree with their elected leaders. It says that a newspaper has an unfettered right to publish expressions of political or moral thought. It says that the Government may not establish a State-based religion that would infringe on the rights of those individuals who seek to be freed from such a religious environment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0632775249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0202681214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.008841962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017880502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016871478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000966978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009421203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005380475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004757997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003560032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.78664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
70.816
Magnitude:
151
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Russ Feingold
Last year I stood here on the floor of the Senate with a number of my colleagues to oppose a proposed constitutional amendment that would have prohibited the desecration of the U.S. flag. I did so because that amendment as proposed, for the first time in our history, would have taken a chisel to the first amendment and said that individuals have a constitutional right to express themselves unless they are expressing themselves by burning a flag.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0345697161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0109465669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038543451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006296264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004719025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002882094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001342745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.49374E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.56873E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.9142E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.2095E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
77.744
Magnitude:
59
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Russ Feingold
Now, Mr. President, I deplore as much as anyone in this body any individual who would take a match to the flag of the United States. And I am firmly convinced that unrestrained spending on congressional campaigns has eroded the confidence of the American people in their Government and their leaders. I believe we should speak out against those who desecrate the flag. I believe we should take immediate steps to fundamentally overhaul our system of financing campaigns. Mr. President, I do not believe, as the supporters of this constitutional amendment and other amendments believe, that we need to amend the U.S. Constitution to bring reform to our system of financing campaigns.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.893
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0068498462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039240065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016837339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000741205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004640262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002125068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001013963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.36047E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.1479E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.5369E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.112E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.6
Automated Readability Index
8.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, sometime in the next day or so, this constitutional amendment will lose. That has been predetermined, or the supporters of this amendment probably would not have been granted consideration here on the floor of the Senate in this manner. This debate has some characteristics of a charade. Again, that is not because of the author, who is sincerely advancing this provision because he believes in it and he thinks it should become part of the Constitution. The ultimate outcome of the charade is everyone knows this will not pass. There are those who want this to sort of be the campaign finance reform debate for this Congress. Have a couple of days of talk, no amendments, have a vote, and be done with it. Be done with campaign finance reform.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16705
VADER
0.275
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0055400786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007859488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000759522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006402195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001126739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.40519E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.49117E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.6783E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.8843E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.265E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.642E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
40.372
Magnitude:
119
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67
Gunning-Fog Score
10.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, believe me, I know the feeling. The Senator from Arizona and I have been there. We were there last year, last summer. We were allowed to bring our bipartisan campaign finance reform legislation to the floor last June, but here was the deal: No amendments, just 2 days of debate, and then we had to vote on cloture, whether we will filibuster, just after 2 days. That was it. No chance to fix the bill up or make it appealing to other Members like we do in other things. That is very similar to what is going on here. We were only allowed to do that after the votes had been counted and assurances given that our bill would suffer a quick and painless death. It was not entirely painless, but it was not unanticipated. We did get a majority of the votes in this body on the first try, 54 out of the required 60 votes but, of course, when the process is set up like this, this simply with these few options, we know the outcome and we know what will happen here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.29412
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.29412
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.57054
VADER
-0.493
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0203380056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0128285319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040139374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032395037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017188569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005278542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002847506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.98829E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.49458E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.25448E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.071E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
55.826
Magnitude:
90
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, I want to point out that things just look a little different this year on the issue of campaign finance reform than they did a year ago. A few things have happened. The McCain-Feingold bill has not been placed on the Senate Calendar this time. It does not appear that the majority leader is terribly interested in bringing it up before the March recess, the Memorial Day recess, or possibly even before the turn of the century. We can speculate about the meaning of that, but one thing is clear: This constitutional amendment will not pass this body, and until this body makes a commitment to considering meaningful, bipartisan campaign finance reform, campaign spending in this country will continue to go completely unrestrained.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.26826
VADER
0.857
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0253819046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0123743463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0080055477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011477499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011476523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001092814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001029176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5747E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.8936E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1321E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0154E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
82.835
Magnitude:
36
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
Russ Feingold
Nothing in this constitutional amendment before the Senate today would prevent what we witnessed in the last election -- the allegation of illegality and improprieties, the accusations of abuse, and the selling of access to high-ranking Government officials would continue no matter what the outcome of the vote we had on this constitutional amendment. Only the enactment of legislation, Mr. President, that bans soft money contributions and that encourages candidates to voluntarily limit how much they spend on their campaigns will make a meaningful difference.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.77778
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.77778
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.7346
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
-0.511
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0224746764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0090927941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0052432613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020987338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017828026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007578925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002676721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001597002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.33202E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.03955E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.097E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, I see Members of the Senate as having, really, three choices. First, they can vote for constitutional amendments and partisan reform proposals that basically have predetermined fates of never becoming law. That allows you to say you voted for something and put the matter aside. Second, they can stand with the junior Senator from Kentucky and others who stood here on the Senate floor last June and told us all was well with our campaign finance system and we should all be thrilled that so much money was pouring into the campaign coffers of candidates and parties. That is a second option that some folks are still pursuing. A third option, Mr. President, Senators can join with the Senator from Arizona and myself and others who have tried to approach this problem from a bipartisan perspective and have tried to craft a reform proposal that is fair to all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.93827
VADER
0.883
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0634917989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0215118751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0124786209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070598056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007952291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005114943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003341144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.40071E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.23563E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.47964E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0936E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
51.381
Magnitude:
44
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
Russ Feingold
We have said on countless occasions that our proposal is open to negotiation. We simply have two goals: To encourage Senate candidates to spend less on their campaign and to give challengers an opportunity to run a fair and competitive campaign against well-entrenched incumbents. If you share those goals, we can work together to produce a meaningful reform proposal.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.919
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
2.1220866591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.021857275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0156730632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095732896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036562822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0023598213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016888913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000198156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001503716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.58412E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.17819E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.982
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Russ Feingold
Let me say our proposal is picking up steam. We seem to be adding new cosponsors a couple of times a week.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0606110669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0386909902
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.030798433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002833058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011763198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003443188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.63605E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.06664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.18495E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.3653E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3907E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
38.938
Magnitude:
84
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Russ Feingold
Three days ago, I was challenged on the floor by a stated opponent of our bill as to why I was unwilling to address, he said, a particular aspect of our campaign finance system. Now, this surprised me very much because, in the 18 months since this legislation was originally introduced, this Senator had not approached me one single time to ask if I would be willing to address that issue. I told this Senator the other night, and I say to all my other colleagues, if you share those two basic goals of reducing campaign spending and leveling the playing field with the Senator from Arizona and I, we are willing to work with you to address those concerns.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16705
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.7458027229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2149429871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.146201672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0434246584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0059336169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.003156723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003549886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003371797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.09368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.37195E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.1174E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
26.513
Magnitude:
116
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
21.179
Magnitude:
116
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Russ Feingold
Let's do this in the context of a real effort, a real debate, not a charade. That real debate will begin when a comprehensive bipartisan campaign finance reform bill is brought to the floor of the U.S. Senate. After this amendment fails, and as the Governmental Affairs Committee proceeds with the investigation into illegal and improper conduct by Presidential and congressional candidates in the last election, it is my hope that there will be an opportunity for an open and full debate on the issue of campaign finance reform.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.23077
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.23077
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.43532
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.6697981618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.089561101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0452840468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0084801097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0074422896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010667222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008479288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003794759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002676259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.99403E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.56296E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, without meaningful bipartisan campaign finance reform, the American people will continue to perceive their elected leaders as being for sale. Unfortunately, they will continue to distrust and doubt the integrity of their own Government.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.669
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
3.5246387124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
2.0726319402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.8184793405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.4119093064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0282085151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0155707443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0066117245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004948127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003715411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.91928E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.91098E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
33.225
Magnitude:
223
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
29.569
Magnitude:
223
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Russ Feingold
So, Mr. President, I urge the Members of the Senate to reject this amendment, again, with the understanding that I greatly admire the sincerity and commitment that its author brings forward on this issue.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.505
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.6407202929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.4363034386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.318459305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1547234715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0144369944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0120351353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0074042058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008579206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002524095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000100813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7369E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
39.786
Magnitude:
214
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.51
Magnitude:
214
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Ernest Hollings
Mr. President, I have tremendous respect for my colleague from Wisconsin. I voted for McCain-Feingold. But in a breath, when the Senator says he wants meaningful campaign finance reform, he is asking that the only real meaningful campaign finance reform be tabled or rejected.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.567
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0147373721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0087939407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074694501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028618879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023056522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017538783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013713437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000726442
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003056047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.39014E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.1165E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Ernest Hollings
Let's look, for example, at the Senator's own initiative here. In McCain-Feingold, it says that voluntary spending limits are set according to a State's population. You get free broadcast time -- 30 minutes of prime time -- and then you get half-price broadcast discounts and reduced postal rates. How much is that going to mean to the Huffington-type campaigns that we see, where they are ready to spend $30 million, or the Steve Forbes-type campaigner, who is ready to spend $35 million? That is not even going to give them a burp in their campaign.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
0.807
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
13.5670632124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.6248129997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.5144577473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.2525527962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0346363056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0177953552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0074632844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003668373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001339153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001186671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.84483E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
29.283
Magnitude:
183
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
26.078
Magnitude:
183
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Ernest Hollings
The candidate's individual contribution limits would be raised from $1,000 to $2,000, if the opponent does not agree to the voluntary limits or declares an intent to spend $250,000 or more of their personal funds. But that is just the interest on the money the amounts of money we are talking about, were it to be loaned. But they have it available. So that really doesn't control the buying of the office. It doesn't control the buying of the office. It is not meaningful campaign finance reform.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.74721
VADER
0.291
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2439798089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0562947011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0390454981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0161789823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0123537975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001799776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000479114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.44691E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.8138E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.4494E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.178E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
95.002
Magnitude:
98
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Ernest Hollings
The Senator wants to ban soft money. Now, here it is. With respect to the Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee against the Federal Election Commission, the Federal Election Commission brought suit charging that the Colorado party had violated the party expenditure provision of law by buying radio advertisements attacking the Democratic Party's likely candidate. This is the evil that you have in these decisions. It went on, and the Colorado Republican Party won out. Why? On account of a key little word: coordinated. You have to prove affirmatively that the candidate himself called up and suggested it or coordinated it, as they say, even if it is proven he called up. It has to be coordinated.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.17007
VADER
-0.128
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0150407272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0111308138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0103613835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014242735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006827348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004501342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.48887E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.87177E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.8903E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.2787E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7471E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
35.027
Magnitude:
104
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Ernest Hollings
Now, I want you all to know the reality of my particular comment. In next year's campaign, newspapers have already run a poll where they have shown that the former Governor of South Carolina, Carol Campbell, if we had the election this afternoon, would beat me. All I have to do is tell that friend there to tell that friend over there to get the third friend to tell the Democratic Party of South Carolina to start running radio advertisements attacking the former Governor as a likely candidate. He hasn't announced, but he is a likely candidate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16705
VADER
0.649
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0666938722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0216738423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0063336374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011472104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007584058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001068579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001061472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.49148E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3081E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.26528E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.429E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
50.741
Magnitude:
129
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Ernest Hollings
But they say everything is fair in love and war and in a political campaign. This is the mischief. It is not just the money, it is the mischief that this nonsense promotes. You can't get to it, Mr. President, without a constitutional amendment. You can't get to it. The distinguished Presiding Officer and I went through this yesterday afternoon. I read down the 20 to 25 campaign finance initiatives we have had over the last 30 years, trying to get a grasp and a grab and a handle on this evil, this corruption. We have tried every way in the world, from having cloture after cloture vote, to arresting the Members and bringing them to the floor. We have tried everything. The best offer now, they say, is McCain-Feingold, but I have gone down it. It has voluntarism. We know from the campaign in Massachusetts what "voluntary" means in politics; it means temporary. When the two gentlemen that ran last year got down to the end of the campaign, they said of the public agreement they had agreed to -- both of them are affluent -- they said, "Let's forget about this limit and let's get affluent." Then they started spending like gangbusters. There you go, voluntary limits and everything else. We have to nail this buzzard with a limit, a constitutional authority to limit.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.83321
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.22222
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.22222
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.43937
VADER
0.881
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.6930993646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1974036219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0137248193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0123653474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0096479795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003733869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.10543E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.63444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5186E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.9056E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.3836E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
61.363
Magnitude:
143
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
10.7
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
46
Ernest Hollings
I hasten to add that I don't prescribe the specific limit. It is still up to Senator McConnell, if he has a majority, to prevail. Unfortunately, we see the machine. We see the orchestration. When I first presented this, we got many Republican cosponsors, and we had a majority, bipartisan vote. Again, on two other occasions, we had a bipartisan vote and the support of a majority. But I can see right now the orchestrated drumbeat of first amendment. And they go back to Patrick Henry and James Madison, and every other kind of fanciful position, to try to get everybody's mind on "let's not rip a hole in the first amendment." And the very authority they are using that money is speech, or speech is money, is Buckley versus Valeo, which does what? It rips a hole in the first amendment. That is their very holy grail that speaks of money. "The first time in 200 years" I don't know how they have the unmitigated gall to come out and say "the first time in 200 years," when in the same breath they are saying, "Buckley versus Valeo, speech is money." Buckley versus Valeo limited the freedom of speech. It "ripped a hole," as they phrase it, "in the first amendment." We can read it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.633
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1751016825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0350190792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.008394583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0062727842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.005634749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010543107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003329725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.63729E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.19395E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.1203E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.3739E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
46.326
Magnitude:
278
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
27.249
Magnitude:
278
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
49
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
Ernest Hollings
I read from Buckley versus Valeo, the majority opinion:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0096247044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0092832917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004441903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0029402949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022077991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001816994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.74395E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.3704E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5098E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9663E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.116E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
52.169
Magnitude:
71
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Ernest Hollings
I will read that again.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2828011988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0475310546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0458045804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0113524453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.005489817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028411096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003097611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.79462E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.43454E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9063E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.53865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Defense
Score:
93.467
Magnitude:
95
Code:
16
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#16
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
5.3
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Ernest Hollings
They limited the freedom of speech of the contributor when they equated speech with money in this famous decision. Everybody knows it. But they want to totally ignore; like this fellow from South Carolina is going to rip a hole for the first time in 200 years in the first amendment. What a charade. They are hiding. They do not want to get serious. They don't want to limit expenditures. They don't want what they overwhelmingly supported 20 years ago with the original Federal Election Campaign Practices Act that said you are not going to be able to buy the office. Now, with Buckley versus Valeo, and particularly with the Colorado decision, you have to buy the office. And they show you how to do it. Two years ahead of time you can see a potential opponent. Just let the party start savaging him on radio and TV. If the gentleman were disposed to announce, by the time he got ready to announce he would announce for the State border trying to escape. They would make him an outright rascal by that time with money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.04
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.04
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.07696
VADER
0.871
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3862677375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0454410299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0333505392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010669002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009479387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004788537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.61076E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.15927E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.37704E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.8098E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.553E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69
Gunning-Fog Score
9.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
46
Ernest Hollings
That is not free and open discourse in the political arena. That is discourse in the financial arena. The financial marketplace is where we are allowing the decision to be made. And everybody in America knows it. That is why we had the investigating committee by unanimous vote of this body day before yesterday saying we cannot countenance this conduct any longer, and we can't dance about on illegalities. We have to look at the improper as well as the illegal. So we unanimously voted it. But now we are trying to cover up on a party position.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.122
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1096185413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1086295117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0210633661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0043025619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006618259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.78427E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
6.7202E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.0104E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.817E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2484E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.9196E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
68.414
Magnitude:
112
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Ernest Hollings
Someone asked me, "Senator, how many votes?" I said, "Well, I came yesterday with hope. But after I saw the particular activity among some of the finest Members that you will ever have in this body, and come along giving me James Madison, Patrick Henry, and the Founding Fathers, they didn't have to get in the horse and wagon and go out and collect $14,000 a week in order to get the office. They didn't have to go around with their national party asking to cut up the opponent before he could even announce. They didn't ask him to spend an average of over $4 million.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.791
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.5546244327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1131315483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0962453254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0738370116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.024960161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051273633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042957683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0013166878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003521783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001232897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.24918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.741
Magnitude:
47
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Ernest Hollings
The Senator from Kentucky, who just withdrew, said he would have to get $5 million. So that is more than $14,000 a week -- not a day, a week -- each and every week between now and election time. Patrick Henry had the freedom of speech and a strong democracy trying to counter -- of course, what the distinguished Senator from Texas commented on, the Gephardt remark. The truth of the matter is they had it in those days as I had it in my days of the beginning political arena. We went around on the stump. You had to get there, or you were embarrassed. "Why weren't you there?" You had to answer the questions. It wasn't all of that expense. It wasn't this third party activity in soft money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.1431
VADER
0.813
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.8006103113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0049498583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036182835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0017888895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012297646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008154602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.46203E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
4.93946E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.43878E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.075E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.079E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
60.44
Magnitude:
129
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
21.881
Magnitude:
129
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Ernest Hollings
So don't come now on the floor joining the stonewalling on the other side of the aisle that we have an advantage -- that we have a financial advantage in spite of all the shenanigans that President Clinton and Vice President Gore engage in. "We have $150 million more. Whatever they did, we did better." You remember that song in the Broadway play. Whatever the Democrats did we can do better on money. And do not be toying around. Get in there and support that Constitution, and read. And they come out and religiously read it. You can't pass any laws, or do anything with the freedom of speech. And, in the next breath, they say whoopee for Valeo. Money is speech in politics. And we have to protect and limit the contributors. That in and of itself sets aside their thrust here today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.23676
VADER
0.957
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.0659825988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0200490438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0195391141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0157715884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001048823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001018831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.36845E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.4264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.99977E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
2.61721E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.55077E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
89.929
Magnitude:
22
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
9.6
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Ernest Hollings
I can read on. Maybe, if we have the time, we will read on because I would be prepared. Some of the colleagues said they would come. But I can see that there is very little interest. I was wondering why the majority leader allowed me to get this on an up-and-down vote. I know I had the amendment on the balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. And the distinguished Senator said, "Now, look. If you set this aside, withdraw your amendment, we will give you an up-and-down vote and sufficient time." I can see after yesterday afternoon, Mr. President, that I have had sufficient time because whatever we say here, they are cast now in the sort of party preference of spending, spending, spending. I hope we can expose it because that wasn't the real opinion over on the other side of the aisle. I had Senator Kassebaum from Kansas. I had Senator Roth from Delaware. We still have, I am pretty sure, the distinguished Senator from Pennsylvania because he had a personal experience. When he comes to the floor you ought to listen very carefully because you can see in reality what this bifurcation finding that contributions are corruptive, or gives rather the appearance of corruption, whereas the explosive expenditures in campaigns, "Oh, that particularly has to be allowed to reign free because we have the free public discourse in politics." You can see the "free." None of this is free when it says here -- "bought" radio advertisements. You can bet your boots the word "bought" b-o-u-g-h-t -- "bought" radio advertising; the word "free." Basically every one knows we are not talking about free speech.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.41935
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.41935
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.86222
VADER
0.976
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0153677815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0067196997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0043847373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018890727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016215872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004739189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004052089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.36704E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.98318E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.7305E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.032E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
60
Sprache Difficult Word Count
64
Ernest Hollings
We have to go along with the Supreme Court in our discourse for the present time. But if we can come now with this proposed constitutional amendment which is stated is needed by a majority of the Senate now three times, by the law professors, by the State attorneys general. And the gentleman here says he has -- that was interesting. He has the Washington Post and the New York Times.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0682102691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.035775936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0145122714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035916848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034680455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012410478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.5743E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.93771E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.0962E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.6045E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
94.768
Magnitude:
92
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Ernest Hollings
Let's see now. I heard just a minute ago from the Senator from Wisconsin. So let's see what the Wisconsin State Journal has to say.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0530257763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0508449622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0230690304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0125092993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041780251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002179329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009477778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001910861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001140356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.17843E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.6404E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
96.059
Magnitude:
22
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.3
Gunning-Fog Score
3.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Ernest Hollings
Our former colleague stood there as sort of the one man on S. 2 -- that supersonic plane that we can all spend billions on, and now the market has barely supported it financially. The Europeans with subsidies have to support it. But the entire Pentagon with all of their minions over here and big budget and everything else, one little Senator, Senator Proxmire of Wisconsin, stood there time and time again with a staff. And he finally conquered not just the Pentagon but the consciences of all of Senators, and we voted along with him.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.333
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3078987123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0464647106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024727975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024250145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010912056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000280118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001086645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.7615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.3193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8165E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9171E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
60.627
Magnitude:
45
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Ernest Hollings
Now let's see, on Monday, March 10, the Wisconsin State Journal, and I quote:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0249690871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0159265037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0049549351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0021340818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021094047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002603721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002298522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001967441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.89915E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.4111E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.777E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
89.9
Gunning-Fog Score
5.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Ernest Hollings
In the Senate, the average cost of a seat exceeds $4 million. As former Senator Proxmire said:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.7121907547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1525513246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1294060494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.039489023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0157386283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0025476873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020628144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006113944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.81656E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.7722E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.1212E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
41.316
Magnitude:
141
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
23.185
Magnitude:
141
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Ernest Hollings
It is not only the time devoted to fundraising that we take away from the people's business, but also the fact that really good candidates are deterred from running for public office because they see the financial obstacles raised against them. For example, as was the case recently in Colorado, the party trying to defend an incumbent can come in and start savaging the likely opponent without any announcement and without any controls over their spending because there is no way to prove coordination. As a result of this flood of money, the regular, average, sane and prudent man or woman is deterred from running for office and democracy itself is corrupted.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.05882
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.05882
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.11123
VADER
0.534
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
2.7259808034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2396723954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2166221617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1006822567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0122566882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0085309395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0085299311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000371165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.56948E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.09115E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.6633E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
91.31
Magnitude:
146
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
Ernest Hollings
It is just not family concerns that causes candidates to bow out. It is the fact that if candidates get serious, they will get savaged. Often I run into friends of fairly good affluence who say, look, I can't expose my family to all this complete disclosure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.436
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1395811327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0732486253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0555818668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0069600181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051577936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035949604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00016394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.66827E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.66671E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.2304E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.0246E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
62.614
Magnitude:
40
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Ernest Hollings
People do not want to expose themselves to such public notoriety. If you want a free genealogical study of your family, Mr. President, all you have to do is announce for public office. Opposition researchers will dig up the place you were born, find out what kind of house you had, where you bought a washing machine on credit, automobiles, how much you contribute to the church, what is in your doctor's records and everything else you can think of. Most of it has little to do with one's qualifications for public office, but that is the nature of the beast -- not the issues, not the ideas, not the candidate's integrity, but insinuations that can be distorted and used against an individual in the court of public opinion.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.47957
VADER
-0.275
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.6559039932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1368605765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0821311434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063798529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0046413719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032369469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017706419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004346977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003930698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000128907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8596E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
39.345
Magnitude:
146
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Ernest Hollings
But the real corruption is in the amount of money necessary in this day and age to run a modern political campaign.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.207708776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0259261549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0211369188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.014106388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0139034222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0105609179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004537932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001065796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.43324E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.80589E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.41044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Ernest Hollings
Let me go back to the quote of our former colleague, former Senator Proxmire from Wisconsin.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0104271785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0070032933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0063127438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0050089002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049727387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0038267626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001361895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.07196E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.67727E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0143E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Ernest Hollings
Let me say that again. "Even incumbents can act when public pressure is high." We saw a perfect example of that the day before yesterday. The Republicans they had it greased; they had a majority in that Rules Committee. The leader came out and said this is the scope of the hearings that we are going to have, like it or not. We are only going to examine alleged illegalities and not the broader question of improper campaign financing. But, as they say, public pressure will change that, and public pressure did.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.4268768951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1917279209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0314106583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0244460651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0113280061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021140224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002719682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001826056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.27031E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.07731E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.3084E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
31.857
Magnitude:
26
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
10.1
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Ernest Hollings
As a result, we had 99 Senators vote on the day before yesterday for broader investigation into improper as well as illegal actions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
-0.361
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1964576542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0235569605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0232963896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0225498457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0042786254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028573584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016604878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001198689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001087369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.00451E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.5718E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
75.683
Magnitude:
167
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Ernest Hollings
After Watergate, Congress took bold steps and set limits on campaign cash. But in the now infamous 1976 case, Buckley versus Valeo, the Supreme Court struck down most of the law, ruling that unlimited spending on campaigns deserves protection as free speech. Again, quoting Senator Proxmire:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
2.3997934535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2690053079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1011106418
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.045665729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0426856801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003987152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003451901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003305647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002371231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001472614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.77995E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
43.839
Magnitude:
65
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Ernest Hollings
I must read that again, because it is so basic.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0054478296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0050368304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025494397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010136939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008705079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007960227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.7196E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.67523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.57648E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1984E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.11E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
32.871
Magnitude:
38
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.7
Gunning-Fog Score
4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.4
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.1
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Ernest Hollings
We must take down the For Sale sign on Capitol Hill by authorizing limits on campaign cash with a constitutional amendment. Let us not be daunted by how difficult such a task may appear, for the price of inaction is far too great.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.4174178932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2814875217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0750671199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0731985609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0292076205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036707457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000925633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.35355E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.15739E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.4434E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.976E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Ernest Hollings
Mr. President, I thought that we might be daunted by how difficult the task would appear. That argument has been made previously by our good friend Lloyd Cutler. He said it would take 4 to 20 years to get a constitutional amendment enacted, and therefore we were wasting our time. But it has been 20 years since the Buckley decision. Let us not talk about wasting time. That is what we have been doing since Buckley.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.75
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.75
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0276013918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0256390398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0079865611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0035446628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022844897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009964319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006317617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.18973E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.7369E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.2314E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.98E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Ernest Hollings
How are you going to stop doing that? A constitutional amendment. The arguments were, "It would take too long," or, "I don't believe in a constitutional amendment; leave it as it is." Now, we know the distinguished Senator from Kentucky, and the distinguished Senator from Kansas, Senator Roberts, engaged in their little sweetheart exchange on the floor yesterday. They both believe in amending the Constitution. They both voted to amend the Constitution in order to prevent the desecration of the American flag. In fairness to Senator McConnell, he said it was a mistake. Fine business. The Court made a mistake when they outlawed the Federal income tax. So, what did the body politic do? The Congress passed a joint resolution and the people of the United States ratified the 16th amendment. Let us read how you can correct a mistake. Amendment 16:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.70805
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.23639
VADER
0.272
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0289979973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040390227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.003317972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030068006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012599435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001242399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008478117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002950565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.72646E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.55982E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.01645E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.5
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
40
Ernest Hollings
That is not what they are talking about now, because we know mistakes are corrected; mistakes with respect to elections have been corrected. The 21st, 22d, 23d, 24th, and 25th amendments to the Constitution, all except the last one, have dealt with elections. So we corrected those mistakes. One important mistake, perhaps most significant, was the poll tax. The people said, "Wait a minute, disqualifying people from voting through a poll tax -- we are not going to allow it." So we adopted that amendment to the Constitution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.83321
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.26826
VADER
-0.494
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
2.1577050909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1440824126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.099882239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0277240819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0255998631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0236819425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0072244897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0049157916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010434946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0009451204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005679721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
90.092
Magnitude:
79
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Ernest Hollings
Now we want to disqualify candidates, parties, and everyone else from running for office by allowing the explosive spending of money; thousands of dollars, $200,000 for this, $500,000 for that. It is just outrageous. Yet, they do not want to recognize it. They want to give me Patrick Henry and go back to the first amendment and read it to mean that any restriction "rips a hole" in our freedom of speech. But it is not so when for the safety of people, we prohibit shouting "fire" in a theater; not when for national security reasons, we prohibit disclosure of classified documents; not so in the matter of obscenity and false and deceptive advertising. Just the other day, concerning a buffer zone around an abortion clinic -- the Supreme Court said, oh, no, you don't have a freedom of speech in that buffer zone. That restriction is constitutional.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.13043
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.13043
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.707
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0155468879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0098364028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019744084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016964394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016238944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014904712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014342947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.57248E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.8708E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.768E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.22E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
23.276
Magnitude:
9
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
40
Ernest Hollings
The contention was made that unless people were given the right to be heard in that particular area, you were ripping a hole in the first amendment. The Supreme Court said no. Get out. Don't get into this buffer zone.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1053880434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0440888572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.025010758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0077551267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0072667826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0057958026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022464683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002934362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.6569E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.77319E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.494E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.923
Magnitude:
10
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.4
Gunning-Fog Score
7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
3.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Ernest Hollings
So we have example after example, but none better than the Senate itself that says you cannot have unlimited debate here in this body; we can get a 60-vote majority and hush you. Over on the House side, they have to follow the 3-minute rule; the 5-minute rule. In committees, we regularly agree and conform to a 5-minute rule for all the members. We know the value of limiting speech. Don't come here with this sanctimony about the first amendment and Patrick Henry and talking about ripping a hole in the first amendment for the first time in 200 years. Buckley versus Valeo -- the very basic authority that you use when you come to the floor of the U.S. Senate saying speech is money, or money is speech -- ripped a hole in the first amendment. That is the exact finding of Buckley versus Valeo.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.21131
VADER
0.749
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1087767188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0208993268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0180881761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028815375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0026653404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004119347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002000492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001244508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8647E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.69537E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.73382E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
90.782
Magnitude:
69
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
10.4
Automated Readability Index
6.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Ernest Hollings
So, that will not wash.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0437594397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0356857141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0124756581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.012203963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0045370343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033022392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010754885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004184963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.08647E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.49859E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.274E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
4.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Ernest Hollings
Mr. President, I have not only the Wisconsin State Journal, I have the Cleveland Plain Dealer. I ask unanimous consent to have that article printed in the Record.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.7809656672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0257071137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0140621501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0134041024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0114740425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0088003493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0019643045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001821861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.001263475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001271149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.78078E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.4
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
5.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Ernest Hollings
These liberal eastern papers, the Washington Post and the New York Times make the argument of free speech. I hope you midwesterners do not get bitten by that. I want to see you stay in the U.S. Senate. I want to see you all continue to serve. The best way is not to get wrapped around and go back to the Midwest and say that the ACLU is a wonderful authority. I know how to lose an election. I have lost before. I don't know any quicker way to lose one than to run around in my backyard or your backyard, Mr. President, quoting the ACLU. You folks have to be embarrassed with this kind of argument about first amendment and the ACLU. And even more embarrassing is the anecdotal nonsense they put up relative to what could happen. The Senator from Utah even said Congress might decide not to let anyone oppose them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.83321
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.27273
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.27273
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.53408
VADER
-0.64
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0727270613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0683329417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0204666474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0112191934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008858462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007550228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007363423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005999442
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003211895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.75595E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.95699E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.111
Magnitude:
179
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
9.6
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
Ernest Hollings
He got into a wonderful discourse with the Senator from Kentucky. He said if this amendment passed, Congress could put such low limits that the opponent's name would never become known and that Congress might decide not to let anyone oppose them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0585792237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0469484366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0135162918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0060237489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000595443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005178238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004560939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.00404E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.28763E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8654E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.639
Magnitude:
99
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Ernest Hollings
Of course, in the next breath they say it is vague, because the language says "reasonable," "reasonable limits." The courts said they are going to decide what is reasonable. But they put up all kinds of examples about how newspapers might write an editorial against someone. And they said that could be a contribution for or a contribution against.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
17.1116381884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.4426923115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0106100248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0100420264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0026408214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023884755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011526926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003791608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000261855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002183829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.08425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
65.925
Magnitude:
222
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Ernest Hollings
Right now the newspapers do write editorials for and do write editorials against. We have the free press. No one has the gall to contend that is a contribution in the context of being a violation. No one is going to contend that now, and they are not going to contend it later on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
-0.451
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0104718572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.005562737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0027888229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001058426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001007729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.42636E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.65243E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.64768E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.42789E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.9484E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1877E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.18
Magnitude:
91
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Ernest Hollings
But these are all straw men, because they do not have the argument. But they have the frontal assault of Patrick Henry and the first amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
-0.52
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0101565303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0081604958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056575678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009399001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007227478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005732795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001530926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.87464E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.02937E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.70219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8563E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.469
Magnitude:
116
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Ernest Hollings
And trying to say, as the Senator from Texas said, the simple question is "Do you believe in free speech or not?" He says if he can answer this question, then he is home free. All 100 of us believe in that. That is not what we are voting on. The question is, Do you believe in limiting spending or not? They know it. And they do not want to hear of it. So they bring out the volume and repetition of numerous Senators talking about 200 years and the first amendment and Patrick Henry. If you pass this, you can go back to what we voted for in 1974 and have complete disclosure, rules against bundling, rules against soft money, rules against individual wealth buying elections. It would free up the speech of the poor. Buckley really freed up the speech of the rich, but it has taken away freedom of speech from the poor. That is the actual effect of the decision, and we are suffering from it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
0.765
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0550287135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0250322279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0148028048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019764715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0017051267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012802006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009922831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003963556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003331027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001937726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.93274E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
42.305
Magnitude:
113
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
9.2
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
35
Ernest Hollings
We have lost the confidence of the people in the political institutions up here because we do not want to deal with it. We tried and tried and tried over a 30-year period without success and now we are using the octopus approach. We want to sneak off in the dark ink of a charade about Patrick Henry, the first amendment, and what may happen.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.16705
VADER
0.108
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0208952406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034913406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0030627623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009312554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006981365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003252763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002422875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.5608E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.04349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7858E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.236E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
87.485
Magnitude:
141
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Ernest Hollings
Mr. President, let us go back to better times. Let us go back to better times.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.7
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2339385683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.050897937
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0301133812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0066932036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007032993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002852407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.57418E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.25972E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.95137E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2164E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.16696E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
58.752
Magnitude:
43
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.1
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Ernest Hollings
What happened was, in better times, we had the orderly process of several hearings before the Judiciary Committee. We had several witnesses. And I come to the distinguished Mr. Lloyd Cutler, who served as Counsel for the President.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0145124373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0140296848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0110094079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018876011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016377877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002583262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001087158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001081367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.37944E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.18622E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2597E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
61.012
Magnitude:
173
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Ernest Hollings
But he says now on the House side:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0408746448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.022903955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0143313431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0089919362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0057295234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001377382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002954445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002370236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001525314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.16154E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.98621E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
90.915
Magnitude:
190
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
3.2
Coleman-Liau Index
3.3
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Ernest Hollings
An amendment would take too long to adopt, 4 to 10 years.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.178
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0265607086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0136000919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0116025723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005130783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009960812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006721872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004885907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003327789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.00022494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.51087E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.13477E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
92.259
Magnitude:
75
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
4.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Ernest Hollings
He did not testify on behalf of the Commission for the Constitutional System heretofore, but he says now that it would take too long. We know that is totally wrong. The last five amendments preceding the most recent one, which took 200 years, took an average of 20 months to ratify.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.675
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0238091117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0097716329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0097110693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0081737664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0057692403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00186283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014725846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005890084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005040444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000126265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.649E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.7
Magnitude:
18
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Ernest Hollings
The gentleman, I think, is suffering from battle fatigue because he said: This could be a camel's-nose-under-the-tent aspect. He did not see a camel's-nose-under-the-tent aspect when he was representing the Commission for the Constitutional System. He says that the Hollings resolution in the Senate authorizes "reasonable regulation of expenditures. Only the Supreme Court can draw the line between reasonable and unreasonable." The courts are always directing the jurors in determining if they have gotten a reasonable decision, the "reasonable, sane and prudent man," in law talk, is the test. We did not have "reasonable" when we first drafted it, but we put it in there so the amendment will not look categorical and result in a legal contest. The Supreme Court is certainly going to decide if it is unreasonable, as they have decided that the matter of contributions is constitutional, if limited to that speech, but unconstitutional if you limit the speech of those who spend it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.86904
VADER
0.758
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.3003841499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0765154837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0657192199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0180013565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0078056008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.006244328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0032434171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009934857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001005553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.56779E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.7083E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
51.906
Magnitude:
11
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
Ernest Hollings
Let me read parts of the hearing here that we had before the Judiciary Committee some 10 years ago. We had already been on this a dog-chasing-its-tail solution for 10 years.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0181271098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0038619688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022247499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011546675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001435761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.39878E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.321E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.1749E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.918E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.74E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.02E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
62.601
Magnitude:
15
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Ernest Hollings
Mind you, Mr. President, as I cover this particular testimony, it is 10 years ago. They are talking about the dilemma, the problem, and how it was exacerbating at that particular time. You can tell the frustration from the wording of this testimony.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.758
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0230650738
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034007106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016437994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.001479259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001137976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001107907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001033753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.82151E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.16734E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.4491E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.3074E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.987
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Ernest Hollings
I go to the quote of Mr. Cutler:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0539674831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.029328643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0187455007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0069963775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0069485453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0064644519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0037509282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003006539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001197508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.17783E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.36964E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
74.887
Magnitude:
131
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
1.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Ernest Hollings
Now, my colleague from Kentucky says you do not have any authority and there is no constituency. The fact of the matter is that this particular committee is a group of several hundred present and former legislators, executive branch officials, political party officials, professors, and civic leaders who are interested in analyzing and correcting some of the weaknesses that have developed in our political system.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.181
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0898023194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0132826433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0055302979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046159908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0043807671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006207263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003498488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.63551E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.28281E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.10779E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.444E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.437
Magnitude:
23
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Ernest Hollings
Not the ACLU. I do not rely on the ACLU for my case. I want to win this thing. I do not want to be spreading the dark ink of the ACLU in the Washington Post. Go down to the Washington Post and ask them for free speech. Say, "I want a little free speech. Not a whole page, a half, maybe a quarter of a page." They will not give you a little tidbit of a column free.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.932
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.094150618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0863452267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0832501391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0416832714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034668719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014720764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0007784623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007293618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002202971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002191523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.68854E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
53.417
Magnitude:
97
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
26.534
Magnitude:
97
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
96.1
Gunning-Fog Score
4
Coleman-Liau Index
4.5
SMOG Index
6.1
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Ernest Hollings
Going back to the testimony before the Judiciary Committee:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.793839246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0427667721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004622405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004722361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001524372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.77636E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.66504E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.3771E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.643E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.975E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.932E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Ernest Hollings
Let me go back to the testimony of Mr. Cutler:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.032891304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0297364779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0267035852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047805352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002015115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000240121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.70205E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.8609E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.75199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.794E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.21E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.087
Magnitude:
27
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.8
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Ernest Hollings
Mr. President, I divert here to emphasize just exactly that concern that our political consensus will be so fractured that it will make "the political process incapable of governing effectively." Put that on as a test to this particular Congress. If you think we have governed effectively, I have grave misgivings with that opinion. I think that is exactly where we are, and exactly was the concern 10 years ago.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.1431
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0646100729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0439065829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0064451189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046073626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0043977863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0034362834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003801047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002045308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
4.63164E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.7293E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.1158E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Ernest Hollings
And I continue to quote the testimony of Mr. Cutler:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0411415647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0099143945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0055953766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012146833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000959775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005508767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002620671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002300342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.93568E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.00696E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7795E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
65.329
Magnitude:
90
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Ernest Hollings
You see, Cutler has come over from the other side earlier this year and he said it would take too long. He was not worried then, some 10 years ago, because he knew exactly that. The last five amendments at that particular time were all ratified within the 20-month period. Now he has misgivings.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.239
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0488682126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0447209459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026993717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023068134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0021171112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018941795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009158879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005092461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004682882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.27891E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.5848E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
49.007
Magnitude:
17
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
5.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Ernest Hollings
Let me quote further:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0669141591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0122763289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0032170115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027756996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008598504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006587994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003276293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.61904E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.61363E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.4027E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.572E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
42.435
Magnitude:
21
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Ernest Hollings
That was in March 1988.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1634695334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050610201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024862638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015492928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003988742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003689822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002599794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001603973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.05604E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.224E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1983E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
87.53
Magnitude:
8
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
0.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Ernest Hollings
Now, Mr. President, I see my distinguished colleagues on the Senate floor. At this time I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1071235747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0497772591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0164388941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032740616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000637667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000253592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.08465E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.18036E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.05018E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.7819E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.0597E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
72.259
Magnitude:
30
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.6
Gunning-Fog Score
6.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
2.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0178675298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0026030508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009930016
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004285302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002764168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002390114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001088144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
9.03065E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.69188E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0031E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.691E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
32.7
Magnitude:
18
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.1
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Pete Domenici
Parliamentary inquiry, are we operating on a time agreement now?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.494
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.7146902382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.315302005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.1896120259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0247898744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0197464979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0182555377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0019213492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018339517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001268624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.7953E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.968E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
90.33
Magnitude:
120
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
10.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1161064254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0300712098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0252306956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0167515318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0080226513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005348046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001094102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.16769E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.82959E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.43213E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5807E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
22.808
Magnitude:
24
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Senator from New Mexico.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0312914897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0213421255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0048663183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023639162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013369161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003380103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002923549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.0112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.81781E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.96675E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.0895E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
73.151
Magnitude:
51
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.5
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
2.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Pete Domenici
Mr. President, let me say that it is not often on matters such as this one that I am on the floor in opposition to something that Senator Hollings favors. We normally are here on either economic matters or budget matters or the like. I want to say right up front while I totally disagree that we should adopt this constitutional amendment and send it out to the States for ratification, I believe it is fair to say that among the Senators who have been talking about limiting or dramatically changing the campaign laws of this land, of limiting of the amount of money that can be spent, at least this amendment is honest.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.06667
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.06667
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.12516
VADER
0.813
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2660770901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0854091952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0155603397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0116723051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0110479727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0042309141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010801303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004784465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.85097E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.51764E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.12609E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
68.095
Magnitude:
66
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Pete Domenici
It faces the reality right between the eyes, and the Supreme Court of the United States has said that you can't do that because you are limiting freedom of speech. And the distinguished Senator has said, OK, if that is the case, I want to change the Constitution, so we can do it. At least that is a straightforward position, instead of coming here and trying to get around the Supreme Court decisions and around the clause in the U.S. Constitution that protects freedom of speech.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.975
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0206864192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0112118571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0101787533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095507217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037446203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0032938824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012482467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.26756E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.17038E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.95021E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3174E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Pete Domenici
Having said that, I want to take a couple of minutes to talk with the Senate about my views and version of why we should not adopt this amendment. First of all, I believe that I should lead off by saying, yesterday afternoon, I was in my office when some speeches were being delivered on the floor of the Senate. I don't think I am much different from most Senators. Normally, if you have your set on and somebody is speaking on the floor, even though we all love them dearly and they are great speakers and they have great things to say, we don't listen very often -- at least, if we are busy in the office, and we do other things.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.946
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.125946803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0507526041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0111192065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063604319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011707117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010463325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004213894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001596051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001344859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.91451E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
40.438
Magnitude:
56
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
29.849
Magnitude:
56
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Pete Domenici
But I took time out to listen to Senator Phil Gramm of Texas, and I tried to tell him this personally so it would precede me saying it on the floor, I thought his remarks yesterday afternoon were very eloquent. They expressed a very good picture of the history of our Constitution and, in particular, of that part of our Constitution that we so glibly say is freedom of speech, protected by that wonderful document and the Bill of Rights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.932
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0261061854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0222491639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.018121046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025442225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001841168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017125318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002292528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.01072E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.05489E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.7032E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
85.35
Magnitude:
83
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Pete Domenici
Having said that, I was not prepared to argue that this amendment is broad enough to perhaps some day affect the editorial policy of the newspapers. I didn't come here particularly prepared to argue that point. But over the evening I read it again and read my remarks. I am prepared to say that I believe the Congress of the United States, if this amendment ever became law, will clearly then be able to determine how we can change freedom of speech in the manner described, and to what extent and when and who will be affected by our changes. I think where this amendment says that the amount of expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to a candidate for nomination for election to a Federal office, and where it is said that you are able to put limitations on the amount of contributions that may be accepted, I believe it is entirely possible that some time out in the future, if this were in fact the law of the land, Congress could decide that a newspaper could only write one editorial a week on behalf of its favorite U.S. Senate candidate because they might equate that with an expenditure. In fact, they might be able to ask, what's the newspaper charging for advertising? And then they might say, when you write something in that paper about a candidate expressing your views, we are going to assume that it is worth at least the advertising costs of the paper.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.65925
VADER
0.954
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0206247569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0202599083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0138302596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0066440152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0048738515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009556522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001934266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001154898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.59792E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.6822E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.0221E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.203
Magnitude:
100
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
46
Sprache Difficult Word Count
52
Pete Domenici
Now, frankly, I am giving you kind of a shirt-sleeve lawyer's opinion. But I can see out there in the future where, under the right circumstances, with a Congress that is being beaten up by newspapers, or perhaps the majority party being beaten up by newspapers or editorials on television, they might indeed decide that they are going to determine the expenditures that can be made and attempt to change our most protected basic right.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.395
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1406201627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0121792247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0113102615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0100463454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051499199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034550791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004372519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002135922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001677937
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001260907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.24347E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.821
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Pete Domenici
Now, having said that I believe the first amendment guaranteeing free speech is the matrix of every other freedom we have, and the most fundamental and urgent application of free speech is to conduct campaigns for political office. Elections and campaigns that lead up to those elections are how the democratic process works. Therefore, I repeat, the amendment guaranteeing freedom of speech is the matrix of every other freedom because it is through the democratic process, the selection of candidates, perhaps even the selection of the philosophy or the ideology of candidates and parties, that decisions are made about our lives and are made about our future. And, therefore, freedom of speech, if controlled, can control that which affects our lives in a most profound way.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.982
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0031499509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008900488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007879638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000726765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004066377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001640284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.02584E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.68228E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.18482E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.0033E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.197E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
42.925
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
20.91
Magnitude:
60
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Pete Domenici
I regret to say that while I am not one who comes to the floor very often and chooses to become popular at home by beating up on Congress -- in fact, I don't think I have done that very often in my life -- I believe it is a mistake to put this power in the hands of a partisan Congress, with the potential for a President of the same party with a huge majority in the Congress, this absolute power to abridge freedom of speech and decide just how much can be spent by whom, what organizations can spend how much on which candidates. The power to determine how much a right-to-life organization can spend on behalf of its candidates or party, or its opposition organization in America, how much they can spend, and a myriad of other organizations that are out there trying to affect Government and how Government works and how we vote -- for Congress to be able to regulate that means we are placing in the hands of Congress and a President of the party in control the absolute and unequivocal future destiny of the election process. They will determine it either directly or indirectly, just as certain as you write in black ink on white paper so that it will be most legible.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.80235
VADER
0.883
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0472805259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0458964932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0144145873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014652763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013992538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005298579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.52624E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.08054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.85431E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.03784E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.9153E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
33.6
Magnitude:
66
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
27.153
Magnitude:
66
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
Mitch McConnell
Will the Senator yield for a question?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
1.0796090588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.5048606079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1979075372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0346581044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0154879541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020064588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008359159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004662971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001758194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.638E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.98801E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
92.167
Magnitude:
75
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.9
Gunning-Fog Score
2.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Pete Domenici
Yes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0148770938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072001974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0060047136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047654285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013118836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002898802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.38159E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.41014E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.20317E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.50569E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6441E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Mitch McConnell
Since independent expenditures and so-called legislative advocacy ads, which have been so widely condemned by the reformers, are constitutionally protected speech, doesn't the Senator think it is entirely possible that the Congress, given the power to control that speech by those outside groups, might decide to shut it off entirely, conclude there is nothing reasonable about any of those kinds of expressions, if this amendment were to be passed?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0629227317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.017574658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020265757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008712063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004649777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001327228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.23207E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.26467E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0686E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2982E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.276E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Pete Domenici
I think, given the right circumstances, that is entirely possible. I can dream up a scenario in my mind where it would probably be constitutional under this amendment. You could have a situation in the country where Congress would make a finding, which may be backed up by what's going out in society. Those kinds of expenditures could cause harm in America, at least to some major group that thought the unlimited use of propaganda -- this is they would call it -- has been harmful to the country, so they will say that we will have none of it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
-0.478
Negative
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0188126636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0089417008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0085494343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014488631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013142051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007398124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003557806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002832053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.11575E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.10785E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.58692E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.4
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Pete Domenici
Let me say, that is one issue, it is clear to me, that in and of itself ought to cause us to say no to this amendment. I think there is even a more serious one. I guess I will choose to say, as my point No. 2, that it's hard enough to win a fight with someone who buys paper by the ton and ink by the barrel. That leads me to ask, who uses freedom of speech most in the United States? Who does? The media of America. The media of America, be it the newspapers, radio, television, or whatever other media we have. That is the principal use of freedom of speech in the United States. They, combined, are the big makers of news. They are the ones who write the news, who talk the news, who present the issues on TV. Frankly, the media sets the agenda. They have even been called the "fourth estate," meaning that we have three branches of government, and they are also a branch of government. Well, we say: Protect them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.957
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0133730151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.006095471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045318538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00239459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015894577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007966015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007053945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001026113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.06643E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.26026E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.5996E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Pete Domenici
As a matter of fact, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a very historic case, New York Times versus Sullivan, a 1964 case, has even held that for a public personage to have a cause of action against the media, which has the right to freedom of speech, to have the right to sue because they told an untruth, you can't sustain a cause of action unless it is made with actual malice, with knowledge that the statement was false or with reckless disregard of whether it is false or not. That is how important we think that right is.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0298952917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.004118411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0025310772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001646903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013575082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004403069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000402428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002395129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002360438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.4979E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.18031E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Pete Domenici
Should it surprise anyone that those who use freedom of the speech in the press of America -- that they have their prejudices? Should it surprise anyone that they pick and choose candidates? Should it surprise anyone that they have a philosophy? Should it surprise anyone, even though they are my good friends, that they are predominantly liberal and predominantly Democrats in terms of party affiliation? That just happens to be true. If they were without opinion and used no discretion, what good would they be as the fourth estate in America? For they would be dullsville, and nobody would care what they said. So they are not that. And they can really influence a candidate or an elected officer's future. They can even do it by neglect, if they choose. They can fail to cover what somebody does in their elected office because they, either directly or in some other way, are prejudiced by what Senator Jones from Kansas says, and so it doesn't appear in the newspapers in the State of Kansas. Or, at least in one chain perhaps, or at least, if that is too far-fetched, a certain reporter won't write about Senator Jones, and he is the reporter that writes the front page story all of the time. That is kind of the benign neglect of the media.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.15789
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.15789
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.30228
VADER
0.883
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.004371148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034972156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033974011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018436262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008412661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005754239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005564763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000306862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.23374E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.87704E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.16625E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
11.6
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
Pete Domenici
What we know is happening in America is that we have moved away from editorial writing only appearing on the editorial pages of the paper. It now also is appearing in the stories in the media. TV has gone from just reporting news to interpreting the news and interpreting situations in America. News shows which do that abound. Should it surprise anyone that sometimes the media take a position in opposition to a President, in opposition to a Senator, in opposition to a party, in opposition to a philosophy of government?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0980977435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0134564165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020044505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016473099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014285668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003564402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001370372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.83054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.94325E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.42332E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9967E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
69.886
Magnitude:
105
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Pete Domenici
Mr. President, if that is the case, where is the candidate or elected officeholder going to get the resources to tell his side of the story? I know where they are getting that kind of resource today. They are getting it because people contribute to their campaign, and they run ads, or they buy time, or they put out brochures, or they get on a radio show and pay for the time. And they say, "If the media and my opponent can get on and get free time, I want to get on and pay for it." Whatever the media puts on is their choice, and they are free to do as much as they want.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.05263
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.05263
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.10008
VADER
0.751
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0151978093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0029172857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027399377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016069485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001086486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000475066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001635328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.76191E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.79538E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.89668E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.60725E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
53.793
Magnitude:
88
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.3
Gunning-Fog Score
11.2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Pete Domenici
I am not going to stand here and be critical of that. In fact, I am suggesting that they are important in this society. It leads me to the conclusion that they have a right to try to be effective in trying to change public opinion. When they do that and exercise that prerogative, they create a situation which in the combat over political ideas requires that, if you are going to respond and have a chance of being heard, you must compete either in ink, or in paper, or in voice over the radio network, or in your picture and voice on television. Or else, how can you get the message across?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0075861273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0013830023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007927077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0005341282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001766943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001212748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.25377E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.9527E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.8174E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.939E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.289E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Pete Domenici
Having said that, I am absolutely convinced that while I stand here and give credence to the United States Congress having great authority, and I would even say that over history, I trust its collective wisdom, I can already in my time in the U.S. Senate find many occasions when I think we weren't very wise and we passed laws that weren't the very best. But even if I were to say over time that we perhaps come out on the wise side more times than not, I am not prepared to give the United States Congress the authority to control the destiny and the lives of political figures today or in the future when it comes to how much of their resources, or resources that others want to give to them, that they can use to make their case.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.49651
VADER
0.967
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2370581031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0093687537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0047512025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0036596099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016062057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008838108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002888346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.66177E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.52425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.15342E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0355E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
63.927
Magnitude:
171
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Pete Domenici
I believe it is a greater and more frightening evil to control the opportunity for candidates to make their case through the exercise of free speech. That is a far more serious problem for America than the concern over too much campaign spending.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.623
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0707610277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0181253316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0117076874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039963681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019807245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017437316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003282704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.58323E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.6712E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1772E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.5698E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
76.496
Magnitude:
107
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Pete Domenici
We can pass reasonable rules and regulations regarding campaign contributions. Clearly we already have. We have limited PAC contributions. We have individual contributions limited. But when it comes to those things that the U.S. Supreme Court has already said are protected because they are political speech, isn't it interesting? Some people, including this Senator, had trouble understanding what they were talking about when they said that spending is equal to free speech. If you want to spend your money on a campaign, the use of that money is speech, they said. Well, I understand it now. I hope I have expressed it today. It is precisely what I have been talking about. For what other way than through the use of resources can you get your speech heard and exercise that freedom I speak of? How can you get your message out to the public if you are limited as to how much, or when, or which organization can spend how much in behalf of your candidacy, your position, or your ideology?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.24171
VADER
0.94
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.139401597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0143949044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0032627289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014539554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008989495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004208633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.85087E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.67996E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.476E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.127E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.338E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
75.684
Magnitude:
93
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
6.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
39
Pete Domenici
So from my standpoint the issue is really very, very clear and very simple. We should not change the Constitution of the United States when it comes to that part of this protected speech that has to do with candidates and political parties getting their message across through the use of resources. Nothing, in my opinion, will suffice other than to leave the decision of what is needed and how it will be used in the hands of the person claiming the freedom. To place it in the hands of somebody else to determine for that person claiming that freedom will, in my opinion, render the freedom useless. For the more you try to tell somebody how to exercise their right to free speech and when they can exercise it, the more the freedom becomes a nonfreedom. It becomes control rather than opportunity to enter into combat in a way that is equal and able to meet any circumstance. I am fully aware that there are many other approaches that we can take to modifying our campaign laws. And some of those being discussed will be constitutional without this change.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.48148
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.48148
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.00552
VADER
0.981
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0187990372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072612143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0043132473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027027361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020983498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013333776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009927829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004701179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003971021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.73955E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2387E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45
Pete Domenici
But I for one want to close today saying to the U.S. Senate, and to the people of the United States, do you really want Congress to be the one that manages by statute the use of this freedom, political freedom, the freedom of political parties and people running for office to use resources in a way that they think is best to get their message out, their cause, and to exercise their rights?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.964
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1093488769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0308687799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0087064444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018903303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006328163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004548729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000307458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002225702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.77026E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.09559E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.978E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Pete Domenici
Mr. President, I want to make 5 points about this resolution and to make them clearly, strongly and simply.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0812974584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0543288421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0110380628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021237196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012582923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001203619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005595682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001601769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001069047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.04825E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.13608E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.4
Gunning-Fog Score
5.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Pete Domenici
Point one: This is an attempt to make the unconstitutional constitutional.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1093488769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0308687799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0087064444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018903303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006328157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004548729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003074578
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002225702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.77026E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.09559E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.978E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Pete Domenici
The first amendment guaranteeing free speech is the matrix of every other freedom we have.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0206770754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0110446337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036736139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0013142489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008598455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006831699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004298231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001200661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.14721E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.08517E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6054E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Pete Domenici
The most fundamental and urgent application of free speech is to conduct campaigns for political office.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.659
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0173383029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0069724934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004951856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027485687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001114924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008529541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.5782E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.26757E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.5183E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.4773E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1822E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
47.594
Magnitude:
158
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Pete Domenici
Elections and the campaigns leading up to those elections, after all, are how the democratic process works.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.3440792672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.056049088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0170358209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0059942038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019599445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016893649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000947287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007533886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001501532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.71269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.613E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.409
Magnitude:
157
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.3
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Pete Domenici
Point two: It's hard enough to win a fight with someone who buys paper by the ton and ink by the barrel. This amendment would make it impossible to win that fight.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0921597821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0064960113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0043026601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012797978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011730844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000548219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001657381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001229211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.61623E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.51371E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.1837E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
77.073
Magnitude:
91
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Pete Domenici
The liberal news media exercises its free speech rights more than any other individual or entity in the United States. They are the Big Opinion Makers. They compose the editorials, write the news, talk the news, present the issues on TV. Frankly, they set the agenda.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0372550101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0102719787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009456103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0076226606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002698834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014631538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007675228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001782541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001278859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.40867E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.606E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Pete Domenici
The media are the ones who exercise freedom of speech as it pertains to politics. They are on the airwaves every day. It used to be that there was political speech on the news at 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. In 1997, there is news at 6 a.m., 7 a.m., noon, 4 p.m., 5 p.m., 6 p.m., 10 p.m., and 11 p.m. on the regular channels. We also have numerous 24-hour news channels.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0099850498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0098203112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028092831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011818802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004883144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000150964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.24793E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.0821E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.7517E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.039E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.86E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
4.9
Coleman-Liau Index
1.1
SMOG Index
6.5
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Pete Domenici
No one would tolerate a suggestion that reporting and editorializing should be censored or otherwise limited or that there should be -- to use the language of the proposed amendment -- "reasonable limits." All of the political speech contained on the news is protected. In New York Times versus Sullivan (1964) the Supreme Court held that public officials could maintain defamation actions only upon proof that the media's statement was made with "actual malice" defined by the Court as made "with knowledge that it [the statement] was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." As a result, the "comfort zone of protection" given to a political figure or candidate for public office under the defamation actions for libel and slander is very small. Public figures are given little protection.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-3.04452
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.08333
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.08333
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16034
VADER
0.128
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0741098251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0099947763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027082031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024826553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006985214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003900396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002464609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000124776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.6044E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.9006E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.534E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
47
Pete Domenici
Defamation stands virtually alone in the 20th century tort law. Every other major substantive area has expanded a plaintiff's right to recover, while in defamation the balance has shifted, and quite dramatically, in favor of the media defendant.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.248
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0065554661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0057510584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0056553075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036036963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004670853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002444694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001216768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.63745E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.37697E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0226E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.54E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Pete Domenici
Point three: Government rationing of political speech by candidates will increase the power of the media, which has an unlimited free speech right.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.681
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.017033011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0144533027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0045146517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029403562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007683328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005542123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002148205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.01202E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8074E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3368E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.406E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Pete Domenici
The makers of the Constitution, influenced not only by their own experience but also by theorists such as Montesquieu, consciously provided for allocation of national authority among the executive, the legislative and the judicial branches. By insisting upon separation of powers, the Framers sought to protect against tyranny. Over the years, the media has emerged as the fourth branch of Government. Creating an elite of those with unlimited free speech will dangerously upset the balance of power and make the Fourth Estate the most powerful. This runs contrary to our fundamental notions of freedom and effective democracy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.22222
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.22222
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.42744
VADER
0.963
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1101189875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0766774174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0075583768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013691954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000691137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002599216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001603802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.57629E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.18088E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.3421E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.384E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
39
Pete Domenici
The members of the fourth estate are mere mortals and they have strong biases.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0100812489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0063957516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026775486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009706256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005778116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003556222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002758801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002056562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.10283E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.77898E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.10042E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Pete Domenici
Reporters are opinionated. Arguably, they are the most politically homogenous and biased group in American politics today. Most studies of media voting behavior show 9 out of 10 reporters and editors voting for liberal Democratic candidates. And the media coverage mimics the media's voting pattern.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.477
Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0484694727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0131592489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0061544873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0042926808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023852501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012910733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001043415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001111241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4086E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.5835E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.123E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Pete Domenici
A study by the Center for Media and Public Affairs, a nonpartisan Washington research group, shows that TV coverage overwhelmingly favored President Clinton this past election season.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.042446921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.029463839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0231556784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0056586792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036238707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024849722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006879156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002622094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.55443E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.54861E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.56881E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
86.095
Magnitude:
21
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Pete Domenici
In September, Clinton received 54 percent positive coverage on the networks' evening news programs, compared with only 30 percent for Bob Dole. The networks criticized Dole's economic views 81 percent of the time, his social policies 78 percent of the time; and his conduct as a candidate 81 percent of the time. Yet, voters view the media as balanced.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3049966879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1795765245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0333429431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.009008569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0086772525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016771186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001751665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001738107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.52406E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.24839E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5368E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.068
Magnitude:
57
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Pete Domenici
We have TV commentators who criticize ideology, personalities, and lifestyle. Yet, the quantity, quality, and content of the media programs and articles are totally protected and unrestricted.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.144
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.01365075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057334866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0030127278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015110432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009443448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001366722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.22054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.82216E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.73239E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.1938E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.839E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
11.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Pete Domenici
A paper could editorialize every day of the week, every week of the year against a candidate. If an elected official or candidate wants to respond, he has to buy an ad. He has to make an expenditure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0085262713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.007880669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011475256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009131929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000331302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002935854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.26043E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.66146E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0573E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.29E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.97E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Pete Domenici
At the other extreme, a Senator could toil tirelessly day in and day out in meetings, in committee, on the Senate floor. An unfriendly paper could ignore his efforts during his entire term. If that Senator wants to let voters know of his accomplishments he has to buy an ad. He has to make an expenditure to compensate for the medias' benign neglect of his efforts. The Supreme Court is correct, free speech is a fundamental right essential to getting reelected. The Constitution is right to protect this fundamental right.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.65925
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0659538899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0529878365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070497139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022564933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008037133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005250396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004064985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001207525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.95745E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.851E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.158E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Pete Domenici
My question to Senators is: Do you really think it is wise to exclusively vest the power of unlimited speech in the fourth branch? If the Founding Fathers were wise enough to resist tyranny by requiring a balance of power among the branches that existed when they wrote the Constitution, we should recognize this amendment as a bald-faced attempt to shift the balance of power from the candidates involved in the legislative and executive branches, over to the media. In practical terms this reserves to the media the control of freedom itself.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.20067
VADER
0.886
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0195987086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074537747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0056060853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004958245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002457193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002148715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001106032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.49084E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.02574E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.356E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8957E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
62.209
Magnitude:
83
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Pete Domenici
The ACLU has called this proposal a recipe for disaster. This amendment makes mincemeat out of the first amendment. Mincemeat belongs on a menu, not in the Constitution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.625
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1736312523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0970008841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0128486703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042794294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041280957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016587612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003066466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000161391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001525335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001004019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.71499E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
48.761
Magnitude:
86
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Pete Domenici
Point four: Being an incumbent is a formidable advantage and this amendment would make this advantage insurmountable.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0104550956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0090831491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046135927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000529047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004511222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002092064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.34822E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.77862E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6194E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.1597E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
50.054
Magnitude:
66
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
International Affairs
Score:
27.298
Magnitude:
66
Code:
19
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#19
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Pete Domenici
Spending is the way challengers combat the inherent advantages of incumbency, such as name recognition, access to media, and franked mail.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.128
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.02240826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.006883977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0065387649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012994991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002080611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001230777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
6.78227E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.73801E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.15112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.4777E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3054E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
81.47
Magnitude:
118
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.6
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Pete Domenici
Besides, the most important and plentiful money spent for political purposes is call the Federal budget -- $1.6 trillion and rising.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.265
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0330954441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0235148604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0132285088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0065345012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034553592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005369669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003067774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003057298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.00020409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001016692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.70614E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
53.846
Magnitude:
90
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Pete Domenici
Federal spending -- along with the myriad regulations and subsidizing activities such as protectionist measures -- often amounts to vote- buying.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.070638035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0121923673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0112983282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.006055431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009332557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008534122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002042927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001142315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.79341E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.72153E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.2812E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
60.79
Magnitude:
34
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Pete Domenici
Write a tax bill and wealth is redistributed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.494
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3901180346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1127659925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0053274514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017112827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015080863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007553886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001992655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.6165E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.98317E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.79082E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.32378E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
64.974
Magnitude:
33
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Pete Domenici
This amendment will allow incumbents to write limits on campaign spending. These limits, when coupled with the inherent advantages of incumbency, will make it more difficult for challengers to compete.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.325
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3373795887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0848292897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0293887366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0044028551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0030658804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020671467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008992943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008314429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007057954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006498427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.54918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
71.122
Magnitude:
124
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Pete Domenici
History gave us 40 years of House control by Democrats. If this amendment had been law, the "reasonable" limits would have been written decade after decade in a self-preserving fashion to favor the ruling party. Is there any doubt that the spending limits would give any challenger a fighting chance?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.4
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.4
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.76214
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0068884357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.00603728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005990803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004555953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000288627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002689438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.46065E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.02434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8081E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.217E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.769E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
71.84
Magnitude:
78
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Pete Domenici
Point five: When amending the constitution, err on the side of caution -- you better be very careful.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.581
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1231989474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0085398518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025887421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001057988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002319859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002010029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.85015E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.61682E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.09742E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3799E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1531E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
37.419
Magnitude:
107
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
26.654
Magnitude:
107
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.809
Magnitude:
107
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Pete Domenici
Mr. President, today truly is a remarkable day. In the name of "campaign finance reform," some of our distinguished colleagues have come to the floor to offer a resolution which strikes at the very heart of one of the fundamental freedoms the Founding Fathers of this great Nation sought to protect. While I agree that our campaign finance laws are in need of change, amending the first amendment to allow the Government to restrict political speech simply is not the way to reform the system.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.933
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.5734951235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0247691525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0158122144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0037281159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018565444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00098912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002200678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.14337E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.31563E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.67286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.40631E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
60.803
Magnitude:
54
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Pete Domenici
The authors of the first amendment were very straightforward: "Congress shall make no law * * * abridging the freedom of speech." Mr. President, surely none of us here today agrees with all of the "speech" people in this county make, especially in this town. I don't like the fact that pornography exists. I don't like violence on TV But regardless of what I like, the first amendment protects this type of speech. While the protections of the first amendment are not absolute in all circumstances -- we all know that the amendment does not protect one's right to yell "fire" in a crowded theater -- the right to free speech is nearly absolute when that speech is directed toward the political process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.899
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0071082548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0053411353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0037386115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016597707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009099676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006657501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.36536E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.89012E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.41913E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.67307E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.7827E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Pete Domenici
Throughout its jurisprudence, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed this notion time and time again. In recounting the history of the first amendment, the Court in the past has observed that: "there is practically universal agreement that a major purpose of the first amendment was to protect the free discussion of governmental affairs * * * of course including discussions of candidates." The Court also has noted that: "It can hardly be doubted that the constitutional guarantee [of the right to free speech] has its fullest and most urgent application precisely to the conduct for campaigns for political office." The Court extended these principles to campaign spending in the Buckley case and held that restrictions on campaign expenditures are improper under the first amendment. The Court's decision can be summed up very simply: restrictions on the resources needed to make political speech heard are restrictions on political speech itself. As the Court has said, "the distribution of the humblest handbill" costs money and the Court consistently and properly has refused to make a distinction between the humble handbill and other forms of political speech. They all deserve first amendment protection.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.97345
VADER
0.914
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0099768455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025020241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006181796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005055512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002141186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001442818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.4301E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7739E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.6565E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.689E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.105E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37
Gunning-Fog Score
18.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
61
Sprache Difficult Word Count
61
Pete Domenici
The authors of this proposal are not so straightforward. It will regulate who may speak, when, where, for how long, and for what purpose.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0383912731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0211317994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0158750903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024880808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004945098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001145076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.21397E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.7891E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6316E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.0839E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.186E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Pete Domenici
For some, this debate will be about the wisdom of the Supreme Court's decision in the Buckley case and those decisions which followed it. Supporters of this amendment believe that, if spending equals speech, then only those with a lot of money will be able to participate in the political process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.872
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0519803085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0246631796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0154651396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0110429282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0091047164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023268729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005258113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002568106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001949212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.34413E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.80235E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
72.059
Magnitude:
52
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.9
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Pete Domenici
I look at the problem from a different perspective: is it at all proper to amend the organic law of this land to allow the Government to begin regulating the political speech of individuals and groups? It runs contrary to the spirit of the entire Constitution to answer that question in the affirmative.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16705
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0520608795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0383912731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0102931779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0100266501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048903275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028519165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00116168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002642399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000126339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.02207E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.73667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
43.147
Magnitude:
78
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Pete Domenici
Thomas Jefferson once wrote that "there are rights which it is useless to surrender to the government, and which governments yet have always sought to invade. Among these are the rights of thinking and publishing our thoughts by speaking and writing." This amendment would be the first step toward surrender, the first step toward putting the Federal Government in control of all political speech in America.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
-0.422
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1432026504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0365432352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0033081367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023499335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019993475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005485475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.11E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8865E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.1785E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.857E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.145E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
42.598
Magnitude:
14
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.8
Gunning-Fog Score
13
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Pete Domenici
Let us take a look at the language of the proposed amendment, because there are two areas which I believe need to be mentioned.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0481303869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0359112339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0270413933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0240290494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0058746857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0053613589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028822327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016194081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012618108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0008331192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0007910658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Pete Domenici
First, the resolution gives Congress the power to set reasonable limits on campaign contributions and expenditures. Proponents of this amendment and campaign finance reform bills like McCain-Feingold claim that the current system favors wealthy candidates and protects incumbents able to raise large amounts of money because of their name recognition, seniority or membership on important committees.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.7741703652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0283907721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0272198988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0046676756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012089374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009528329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004071212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003420218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001823889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.39724E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.69449E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
21.356
Magnitude:
21
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Pete Domenici
Yet -- under this amendment -- who would be responsible for making the initial determination of what is "reasonable"? Incumbents. Members of Congress. Setting aside whether it is at all wise to allow the Government to regulate political speech, I also wonder whether this amendment would accomplish the goals many of its supporters would hope for. Government micromanagement of political speech, particularly by those already entrenched in government, to me seems like a recipe for more of the same problems we currently face.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.947
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1237291959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0474903616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0116323281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0064220992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0053785032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0041677464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033246044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008435276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000369267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.28835E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.57929E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
35.916
Magnitude:
45
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
24.325
Magnitude:
45
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.9
Gunning-Fog Score
15.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Pete Domenici
The proposed amendment also allows Congress to regulate contributions and expenditures "made by, in support of, or in opposition to" a candidate. Under this language, Congress can regulate the political speech of candidates, parties, individuals and groups. One group that apparently remains unregulatable is the media. By limiting all political speech, except that by the media, the role and importance of the media in the political process would grow exponentially. I have already discussed that. Yet despite the power it would provide to the press, the Washington Post and New York Times oppose this amendment. I think I know why.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.26720108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1029695035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.06036337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0420792756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0174712346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0114698203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.007879339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003453442
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0015786263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005701521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004126999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Pete Domenici
The first amendment is at the heart of the basic freedoms all Americans enjoy, including the freedom to promote one's political views. If we amend the first amendment to limit the political speech of candidates and parties, what is to stop us from amending the press's free speech rights if we become unhappy with their role?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0148104285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0139210519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0101917591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0088032539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009793462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009690661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002425302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002249091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.04137E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.27514E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7567E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
37.455
Magnitude:
63
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
22.304
Magnitude:
63
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Pete Domenici
While we all have felt the sting of a harsh editorial on the pages of a State or national newspaper, I do not believe that any of us feel comfortable with the possibility that Congress could be in the business of regulating the content of newspapers. Yet that seems like the logical next step if this amendment were to pass.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0213895706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.014063908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0075524258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0058351667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019154382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006248512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005838637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.74667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.09987E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.87301E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6247E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
49.819
Magnitude:
77
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
24.89
Magnitude:
77
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Pete Domenici
I understand my colleagues on the other side of this issue who seek to "level the playing field" or make the campaign finance system more equitable for all participants in the political process. We all would like to see candidates unburdened by the "money chase" and campaigns free of excessive negative ads. But this is not the way for us to get our house in order.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4926938564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1714310143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0250039622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0138838659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040946947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027174363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006902696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006531817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.15191E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.08588E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.9192E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
51.757
Magnitude:
19
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Pete Domenici
President Eisenhower once told Congress that "freedom has been defined as the opportunity for self-discipline * * * Should we persistently fail to discipline ourselves, eventually there will be increasing pressure on government to redress the failure. By that process freedom will step by step disappear." I think that comment sums up where we are headed with this amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0154965222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0125108127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032694817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014569701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002558253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002103485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.70456E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.14214E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.03844E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.902E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1297E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
53.53
Magnitude:
33
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Pete Domenici
As politicians, we have failed to bring discipline to the campaign process. Rather than give in to the pressure to redress our failure by restricting the freedoms offered by the first amendment, I believe that we should look to other, less onerous, means to achieve our goals. I support reasonable campaign finance reform legislation, and have done so in the past. But this proposal goes way beyond reform. It makes mincemeat of the first amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
-0.758
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0494534615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0473325694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0270239951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0099346653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024250698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011025068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001918123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001749054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.01686E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.51036E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.2687E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
46.395
Magnitude:
72
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
21.427
Magnitude:
72
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Pete Domenici
If the concern is that money corrupts and a lot of money corrupts absolutely, there are steps that can be taken that don't require amending the Constitution. Full disclosure is a good way to provide good government.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.7
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0091244539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0059507303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031063675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004697441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003595936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002105169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.17832E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.54459E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.10643E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.40058E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.19448E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
67.199
Magnitude:
79
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Pete Domenici
I urge my colleagues to reject this amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0131092907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00789978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002465002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001251212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003481796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003138087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001301642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.80332E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.39513E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.1942E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.25747E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Pete Domenici
Several Senators addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.017932523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0107568034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038370643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035526085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006409563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004001166
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002181504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.21039E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.5388E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.5937E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.142E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.5
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1133797457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0892120239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0099131743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024044779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006009417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004087926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002220202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001570159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.37271E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.04487E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.409E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, I thank my distinguished colleague from New Mexico for an outstanding speech. I think he is right on the mark. The issue here is who is going to control political discourse in this country. And the Supreme Court has said no one may do that. That is protected first amendment speech.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.896
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2859349595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1702788868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.036383071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0070172646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034657482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033923603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002722767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0010690604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0006331701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.58965E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.83887E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.7
Gunning-Fog Score
7.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Mitch McConnell
I just wish to thank my good friend from New Mexico for his thoughts on the first amendment and say I agree with him entirely.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.049509661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020263633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020053571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017350147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011883416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005975101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003009979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002472293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001767833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001408618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7963E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Pete Domenici
Might I ask the Senator a question?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0983545906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0897339836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00576737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035132605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011574159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009422586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007691634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001811636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.31001E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.64302E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.736E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.9
Gunning-Fog Score
2.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Mitch McConnell
Yes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0966111082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0737868249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0443309284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0339835766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.012496351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0032780517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0025447758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013770366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000209626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001509539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.17302E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
81.135
Magnitude:
62
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Pete Domenici
I alluded to a couple of organizations that are openly engaged in trying to get their points across with the electorate and with those seeking election. Are there a number of groups that are involved in that kind of activity with the American people and with candidates that have expressed their views on this amendment?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.9168847464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0423690595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0327767368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0149877276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0137655283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0087843269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007246451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001734464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.7231E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0214E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1293E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
94.219
Magnitude:
60
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Mitch McConnell
There certainly are, I say to my friend from New Mexico. There are periodic meetings in my office with a coalition in defense of the first amendment that includes a set of groups that have never met each other before. On the left, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Education Association; on the right, Right to Life, Christian Coalition, and all shades of philosophies in between, all of whom have one thing in common -- they do not want Congress to push them out, do not want them to push them off the playing field and keep them from participating in American elections.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.876
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.174837315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0427656516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0062314073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015495249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010398627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004465622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004269401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.85604E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.65396E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.9293E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.7801E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
20.445
Magnitude:
43
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Mitch McConnell
So this coalition is very active. You would think, listening to the broadcast media and reading the Washington Post, that there was nobody on the other side of this debate, that Common Cause was the only conscience out there pressing for these kinds of reforms. Ironically, Common Cause is against the Hollings constitutional amendment as well. But there is a broad coalition, I would say to my friend from New Mexico. They are very active, very involved, and do not intend to be taken off the playing field.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.901
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0012930905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004071957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004041291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003322071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
9.32792E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.17252E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.78987E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.13654E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.4796E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.9093E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.246E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Pete Domenici
Does the Senator have any idea why they would be opposed to it? Can the Senator express what they said to him?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0344778877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0026408665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025955871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009889558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009754005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004240275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.29937E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.14027E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.34064E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7098E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.0787E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
2.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Mitch McConnell
What they say is they believe the Supreme Court was correct when it said they had a right to support or oppose whomever they choose in the American political system. They know that if Congress is given the power, either through a constitutional amendment or through a measure such as McCain-Feingold, their voices will be quieted, their ability to participate will be capped, limited. They are quite concerned about that and feel that this is not a step in the right direction, that in fact it is the worst possible thing you can do. If you look out at America, we are a seething cauldron of interests. The Founding Fathers envisioned that. The Supreme Court has made it clear that all those interests have an opportunity, a right, a constitutional right to participate in the American political system, and these groups don't want to be pushed out. They think their causes are important. They want to be able to advocate them. They want to be able to support whomever they choose.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.48148
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.48148
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.00552
VADER
0.956
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2607993083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0402845879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0073167503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047706297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014540829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007183616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005440223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001389234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.91442E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.75266E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3165E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
54.999
Magnitude:
82
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37
Pete Domenici
So it seems to me that if the National Education Association opposes this amendment and the National Rifle Association opposes this amendment, then they must be saying that if this were the law of the land, that some Congress in the future could do violence to one or the other of them in terms of their promoting their cause with the American people and with candidates. In fact, they must be worried about whether there might be some picking and choosing among those who might have the right to promote or to participate in the process of trying to influence candidates and elections. Is that not correct?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.1431
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1929730875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0572329212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0133882364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063571089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024745788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005070596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004830606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.91794E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.75609E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.48553E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4913E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.879
Magnitude:
53
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Mitch McConnell
That is absolutely the case, I say to my friend from New Mexico. They fear that a Congress, that a future Congress, will try to quiet their voices, to push them out of the process, to make it impossible for them to support candidates of their choice. We know that there are schemes around to do that. There is a bill that we will be debating this year absolutely designed to put a limit on how many people can participate. So their fear is well-founded, I say to my friend from New Mexico.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.20067
VADER
0.345
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0048053815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003342365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015708398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012716089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001323212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001076344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.24037E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.57607E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.80085E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.6482E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.617E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
44.699
Magnitude:
120
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Pete Domenici
Mr. President, I just want to continue for a couple more minutes. I thought I was finished but I am prompted to say I am not.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.039
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1391028753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1167376642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0283244794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.007098724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0023762797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022099099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013764115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0006692015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004237211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001592019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.08663E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
49.691
Magnitude:
119
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
87.4
Gunning-Fog Score
6.5
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
0.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.071635691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0290242169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0128058731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095092197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003913308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000658621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000272497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001348152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.90801E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.77356E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.76322E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.53
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.6
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Pete Domenici
Am I recognized, Mr. President?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0187036509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0141724668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.007910945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0078141798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024126757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001906226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.22665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.70009E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.61385E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.2177E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.9228E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.209
Magnitude:
20
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0191747517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0064307947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.005651329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048180736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011820211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011431292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003164467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001041715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.34599E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.70692E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.523E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.6
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Pete Domenici
I thank the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0694100047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0232877719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0182351141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020172836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009787933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002988393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002030771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001593839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001462055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.89648E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.91929E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
79.688
Magnitude:
61
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Pete Domenici
I am not here saying that Congress absolutely would do this, that this would be something that we could just expect in ordinary times, but I believe bad laws are made in unordinary times. I believe bad laws are made when things are not going well and somebody decides that they know why they are not going well. That is why I am reluctant to say Congress, over the scheme of history, would not act in some almost aberrational way to limit speech if things just were not going right and it was their decision there was just too much going on out there in the political arena. Those kinds of things have happened in our history. They have happened and you look back and say, how could it have happened? Historians say all of these different things came together at the same time and, of course, some people thought they knew precisely why and they acted accordingly.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.932
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0715345959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0346519606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0137122741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0086930631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020695394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011080247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005511683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002509892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.06405E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.68391E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.35504E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
28.723
Magnitude:
50
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Pete Domenici
Now, I also commented about the media collectively as being the big user of this freedom and, indeed, I think that is a fair statement. Frankly, I do not think anybody individually within that collective media would question this statement. They are not always right either. They are not always right in their conclusions, individually and collectively. Even if they are not disposed to be philosophically one way or another, they are frequently wrong. And yet their wrongness is protected by the Constitution. The quantity of that is protected in that if they have enough money and own enough papers, they can be as big as they want. Or if they happen to be a personality that now gets on the nightly news and has reached an esteemed position, then clearly they can say what they like and it becomes kind of what people think, what people talk about the next day. And they might be wrong.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.65393
VADER
0.866
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0396623014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0202980576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046887195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036158137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023560122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.00092564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000498098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004185938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002716773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001631868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.3216E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
63.945
Magnitude:
61
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Pete Domenici
So it seems to me that when you put all that together, you do not want to change that. That is a great part of America. We want to live with that. Some of us do not think that Congress ought, with that being the reality, to have the authority to say how much you can spend in a campaign to tell your side of those same facts that others are pushing on the public either through the exercise of their right or by campaigning and being in the political arena.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.682
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.156794698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0447861588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0309584313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0086878412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0061239269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045673136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00185886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0016222553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0010831362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001080996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7327E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
22.263
Magnitude:
78
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
20.225
Magnitude:
78
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Pete Domenici
I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0477907568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0228048084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0129781227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0079412683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0069373818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0065825778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0039490085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008620945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001656584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.7989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.6701E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
34.354
Magnitude:
73
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Pete Domenici
Mr. McCONNELL addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1968555618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0446332589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0211663631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00182847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016454886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016269374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.31828E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.97054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8737E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.7544E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.32E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
81.621
Magnitude:
58
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0196050445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0064055916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0058317619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048520968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001181807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011795538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003145209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.95634E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.51436E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.62105E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.336E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, I thank the Senator from New Mexico for a very important contribution to this debate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.552
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2229449106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1125249313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0554041413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0133045993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0073475145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019554322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000879344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006524912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0006067002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001070598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.90004E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
71.184
Magnitude:
94
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Mitch McConnell
Mr. HOLLINGS addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.3242415376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0635235454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0185926619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0118266602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007949925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003838059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.92401E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.35905E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.04523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.58841E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.432E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
50.18
Magnitude:
69
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0138805714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00421121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017689475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008795713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006621637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002619167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.78465E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.92216E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.6537E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.315E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
74.179
Magnitude:
120
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Ernest Hollings
I thank the distinguished Presiding Officer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0081182567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070170507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0061840314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.004349924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005098779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003098527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001888109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.56263E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.41775E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.06329E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6247E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
54.206
Magnitude:
45
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.4
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Ernest Hollings
Mr. President, the Senator from Rhode Island has been in the Chamber waiting to be recognized, so I will just take a few moments and ask unanimous consent to insert in the Record the "American Constitutional Law Restatement on the Freedom of Speech," by Laurence Tribe, Ralph S. Tyler, Jr. Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard University.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0374711846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.010297144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0094674899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.007575428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027072503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014521497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007661837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001753933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001268842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.39403E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.641E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.4
Gunning-Fog Score
7.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Ernest Hollings
Mr. President, this explains the subjects outside our first amendment protections. It mentions the Sullivan case, New York Times, and others.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0260392902
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0158696435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0066035835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007863206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007504779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
9.98935E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.49968E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.00258E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.42546E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.18609E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.9108E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
58.747
Magnitude:
77
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Ernest Hollings
One. We are not talking here about free speech. We are talking about paid speech. My amendment reads "expenditures." It has nothing to do with the free press. The very horrors that are mentioned could happen today, and in fact, happened to this particular Senator in his race for reelection back in 1992 with the Wall Street Journal.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.389
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0525064301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0131901674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098016375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024181487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011480607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0010245881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006363475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005740837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002763744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.72583E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.24864E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
56.276
Magnitude:
61
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.9
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
8.5
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Ernest Hollings
I will get into that in depth, but I am delighted at this time, Mr. President, to yield, and I hope the Senator from Rhode Island can be recognized.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.852
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1301100012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0303908688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0118774726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0053459815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0050870229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001502698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.56042E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.34403E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1957E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.7533E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.975E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
55.231
Magnitude:
29
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Ernest Hollings
Mr. REED addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1830772846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.034640549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070062786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013296444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007882705
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005180861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001922769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.95731E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.65029E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3162E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.2584E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
59.562
Magnitude:
36
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
26.711
Magnitude:
36
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0038845628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032485776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002660023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021412598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003573735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002007522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001729939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001099542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.1368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.95794E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.17E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.7
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Jack Reed
Mr. President, I rise this afternoon in support of the Hollings amendment which I think is a wonderful first step to begin to reform our campaign finance system. As many of my distinguished colleagues have mentioned in the course of this debate, at any time when you attempt to amend the Constitution of the United States, you do so with trepidation. This is the fundamental organic document of our Government. It deserves great respect and reverence, and we do not do this lightly.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.947
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0118767246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0061358638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011200457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009720158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002943516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002064808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001884517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000122728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000107917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.5804E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7652E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.35
Magnitude:
20
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Jack Reed
But today we are facing a crisis of public confidence in the democratic order in the United States with respect to campaign finance reform. If the Constitution and the Court had remained silent on this issue, we would not be here today. But the Court has spoken, first in the case of Buckley versus Valeo, several years ago, and in its progeny. Their voice has concluded, and some would argue not correctly, but concluded that the first amendment prevents Congress from imposing limits on campaign expenditures.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.178
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0537315034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0512042141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0061871171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054752829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0046306996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0029579283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009833544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008656163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001105269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.76802E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.2884E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
63.895
Magnitude:
73
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Jack Reed
If the Court refuses to reassess its ruling, we have no choice but to propose to the people of the United States that in their wisdom they consider an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and that is why we are here today. We are not doing this in a vacuum. We are doing this because of a crisis in confidence by the public.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.881
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0502336945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0483970594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0078867888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0076737284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0060900675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017000964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009066205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002135521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001731824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.94078E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.5757E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
88.244
Magnitude:
122
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Jack Reed
To be kind, the public is disenchanted with the American political system, particularly the American political campaign finance system. They see far too much money going to campaigns. They are concerned that this money is extracting special interest favors. All of this undermines a sense of democracy, a sense of participation, a sense of what it is to be a citizen in this great country. Last year's election saw record fundraising and record expenditures. An unprecedented $2.7 billion was spent in Federal elections last year, three times the amount that was spent the year the Buckley versus Valeo case was decided. As this money is poured in, the public is becoming increasingly disenchanted and increasingly disenfranchised from the process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.772
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0435906812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0215585693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035928835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001315095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.09278E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.74019E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
3.6475E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.7839E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.2639E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1707E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.06E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
68.51
Magnitude:
33
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37
Jack Reed
In a 1992 poll, 84 percent of the electorate stated that Congress was owned by special interests, a direct reflection, I think, of the perception of how the campaign finance system may work. For the first time in decades, last year's Presidential elections saw less than half of the eligible voters going to the polls to register their votes. The American public sees a great problem. Months ago, in the Washington Post, 80 percent of those surveyed indicated there was too much money in campaigns and favored the adoption of campaign spending limits.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.836
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3394893836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0464261713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.029217705
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0121085301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004383603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002562162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001760355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.70974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.69521E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.12197E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.01335E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
59.061
Magnitude:
33
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Jack Reed
For the well-being of our democracy, for the confidence we must have of its citizens, as we go about doing our work, I feel this amendment is in order and indeed must be enacted.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0297432271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0272936246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0038512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030975967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001303914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.53768E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.67985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.36928E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.611E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.5412E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2687E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
47.172
Magnitude:
87
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Jack Reed
As I mentioned before, the great stumbling block to effective limits on campaign expenditures is the Supreme Court decision in Buckley versus Valeo. At the core of that 1976 decision, there is this language:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.836
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0083576815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032517419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028658151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0013245479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011668773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003239739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002215427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.74418E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.37666E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.6914E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.3251E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Jack Reed
That seems to be the core sense of why the Court decided it. But I suggest the notion that citizens and even candidates are controlling the system today has been overwhelmed by events, overwhelmed by an avalanche of money coming into political campaigns. In fact, the system that was created under Buckley versus Valeo has collapsed, in effect, inundated by independent expenditures, special interest expenditures, money by the torrent coming into campaigns. It is not surprising, then, that the Washington Post detailed that the special interests coming into a campaign in Pennsylvania's 21st Congressional District outspent either one of the candidates. In effect, the candidates control neither the dialog nor the issues; it was outside forces, some of them anonymous or at least ambiguous.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.53408
VADER
0.855
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0025666108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012826557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007677329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006800789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006504596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003595462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000155992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.27839E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.13855E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4348E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2564E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28.8
Gunning-Fog Score
16.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
48
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44
Jack Reed
All of this contributed not to what we think an election should be about, two candidates or several candidates presenting their ideas, arguing eloquently, reaching out to people. In effect, the candidates became a sideshow. It was the battle between special interests. That is not what the American people want to see in their elections, and if we are to control that and constrain that, we must have, in this particular moment, a constitutional amendment to do so.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.052
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0245949661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0066050881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0058126017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014666841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006871832
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006647547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005634597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.32339E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2744E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8738E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.534E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Jack Reed
The issue about the Buckley versus Valeo decision is one that constrained our thought about campaign financing for many, many years. My colleagues in this body have offered many proposals, legislatively, to correct it. There is the Feingold-McCain bill. There is other legislation. Leader Daschle has introduced legislation. I support all of these. But my fear is if we adopt any one of them, and I hope we do adopt campaign finance reform legislatively, the ingenuity and creativity of lawyers and consultants will find ways around it, simply because ultimately we cannot control the amount of money going into campaigns. This amendment will give us that authority.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0566729344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0143788799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0101087324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095016869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027975304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015031313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001111748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.41902E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.00152E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.61547E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.88081E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
59.688
Magnitude:
19
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.6
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
39
Jack Reed
The concept, also, that unlimited spending is good, I think, has to be looked at very skeptically. Unlimited spending can drown out free speech, can squelch someone who does not have the resources to compete. It may not, in fact, always advance the concept of a free exchange of ideas in an electoral campaign.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.517
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0612093601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0026816859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020236133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012928598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012282562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010185071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007264587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000271034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000229375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001721922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.39838E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
87.936
Magnitude:
40
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Jack Reed
Many of our leading constitutional scholars, in fact, have reached this conclusion. Paul Freund, the distinguished professor at Harvard Law School wrote:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.103
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1210182556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.023249544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0230916514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.019129811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033770477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028702982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010536955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002546212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.49952E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.88458E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.8841E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
67.194
Magnitude:
44
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Jack Reed
Judge Skelly Wright, one of our most distinguished jurists wrote:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0065094988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0035594181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015940132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006639424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002802679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001409452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.27019E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.07689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.992E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3823E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.635E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
34.335
Magnitude:
93
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
33.773
Magnitude:
93
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Jack Reed
In the words of a distinguished New York School of Law professor, Ronald Dworkin:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0054193883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017058795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007820533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001864497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
6.41123E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.95706E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.42662E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.597E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.84E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.885E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.5E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
66.221
Magnitude:
158
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Jack Reed
All these experts would conclude that Buckley versus Valeo in effect is wrong. But Buckley versus Valeo as it stands today is the law and, recognizing that, we are attempting to give the people of this country a chance, through the amendment process, to change that decision, that position of the Court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
-0.477
Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0145866463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0091479422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023178389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017273247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007335457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005152932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001596428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.59979E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.8621E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.717E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.14E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Jack Reed
If you look at Buckley versus Valeo, though, perhaps the best argument I found against it was contained within the very confines of the decision. It was the dissenting opinion of Justice White. I do not think anyone has to vouch for Justice White's fidelity to the first amendment and the values that it holds that are dear to us all. First of all, time has proven Justice White to be very perceptive, indeed prophetic. Because he wrote:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
0.953
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0629978604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0241267771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0078197409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022654996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000927692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001909468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001095451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001074182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.11915E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.5963E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.652E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Jack Reed
This is in 1976. Again, recall, since he wrote those words, campaign spending has tripled.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0869847543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0535793544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.030537424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009510717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007537228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005292286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004433487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.67208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.99036E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.68408E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.4743E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
92.1
Gunning-Fog Score
3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Jack Reed
He also went on to add:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1962444978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0256618601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0201165793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0085215892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0048823083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021455075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010461948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007236644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001532441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.05273E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.52659E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
85.786
Magnitude:
90
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
0.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Jack Reed
I would argue there is no one here in this body who would suggest that that treadmill is not still there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.557
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.047666172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026465339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014005541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011046105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008523206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000127346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.58474E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.96903E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.54108E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.696E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.136E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
29.529
Magnitude:
75
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Jack Reed
I have heard in the debate notions about how this would infringe on treasured values of the first amendment. But Justice White, in his opinion, pointed out that this is not a unique issue, that the limiting of the quantity of speech is done routinely.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
0.866
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0219819398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0068775924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011699059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006897168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006061565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.7042E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.5809E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
2.95152E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.91566E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.39268E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.17191E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
28.029
Magnitude:
46
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Jack Reed
As he said:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0149779837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0098103796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0061437502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0047538313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038299211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011192908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.26467E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.16906E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.32482E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.4929E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4953E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
63.342
Magnitude:
71
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
0
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Jack Reed
We do on a routine basis require newspapers, the great champions of the first amendment, the most vociferous defenders of the first amendment, to comply with laws that effectively limit the quantity of speech that they can put out. So this notion that what we are doing today trods on the sacred core of the first amendment, I do not think is right.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.873
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1249749912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0206707075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0064782813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0052889045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036398233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011028379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.60111E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.47238E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.58987E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.3101E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1017E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
28.064
Magnitude:
95
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
26.123
Magnitude:
95
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Jack Reed
Indeed, I think we would be better off to have the Court reassess its opinion of Buckley and find that these limits are appropriate under the first amendment. But today, we are left with presenting to the American people the opportunity to make that judgment. I hope that, as I said, Buckley could be reviewed and indeed be recognized by the Court to be inappropriate based on the facts today. They have the authority to do that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.836
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0118839635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0113705813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.003868814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0037376278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012842506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008599545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004499256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003189548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002053252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001899475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.2842E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Jack Reed
We have the authority to present to the American public this constitutional amendment. I urge that we do so.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0099232275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098936733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028244283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011927035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004967612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001536435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.27734E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.0796E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.7795E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.037E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.88E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Jack Reed
I want to commend the sponsor, Senator Hollings, for his leadership, for his perception of the issue, and for his unflinching commitment to develop a campaign finance system that is fair to all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0620894658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0171747975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019977619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008722023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004607319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001245216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.97606E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.12156E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.6415E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.1781E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.146E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Jack Reed
One last point. I have also heard in this debate the notion that this Congress would impose irresponsible and reckless limits. In reality, any limits we impose we would all have to recognize and work within. They would be the same as applied to Republican candidates or Democratic candidates. They would limit the amount of money that right- wing, special-interest groups could put in or left-wing, special- interest groups could put in.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.28571
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.28571
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.54654
VADER
-0.511
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1560812816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0135271606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028863586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024271985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020508432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002531657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.50603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.89467E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.20593E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.76179E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1866E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
27.841
Magnitude:
72
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Jack Reed
They would, in effect, return our elections to the democratic process that our citizens believe we should have, a process by which they can listen to the voices of the candidates, they can communicate their views, they can, in effect, not be drowned out by an avalanche of money and 30-second sound bites. In fact, an election can be a dialog about democracy and not about who raises how much money. I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.55
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0218252884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0159121744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0097333555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009817886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007052323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005573288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004022162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.58736E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.26527E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.15019E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.00961E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.8
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Jack Reed
Again, I commend the Senator for his great leadership.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.791
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0245861273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0183121083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0146359816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0081547158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015237587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008481521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.27476E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.56943E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.4424E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1601E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.417E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
66.405
Magnitude:
113
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Jack Reed
Mr. HOLLINGS addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0227981349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070566894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037243241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022845725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016307804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000586669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004005274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.27795E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.10226E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.71376E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.37944E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
86.945
Magnitude:
61
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Jack Reed
Mr. GORTON addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2451702952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0441792683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029427127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011805206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010680699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005641485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001302411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000113498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.95317E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.27157E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2197E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
51.72
Magnitude:
91
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.049028598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0188231075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0063362953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0061229926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.00396867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020397119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0015118389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001467241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006036621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001958228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.19573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
52.541
Magnitude:
56
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.4
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Ernest Hollings
I will yield in a second to the distinguished Senator from Washington.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0510011858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0423650024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0169315303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.010217711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0048606416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027523562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005941694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002521439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.9717E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.21943E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.28895E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
81.645
Magnitude:
149
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Ernest Hollings
I want to thank the distinguished Senator from Rhode Island. He was tortured with the same problem as a Member of the House. As a good old West Point graduate and with the discipline and the analytical approach that he has learned over the many years in public service, we really appreciate his contribution here today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.332
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
2.1967470646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
1.1169727892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1253389404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1117952401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0310098025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012205077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005871806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.70144E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.02411E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.19243E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.211E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
76.513
Magnitude:
128
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Jack Reed
Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1455906313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.066369446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0601072097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0117261887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036382826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006229294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.64711E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.73466E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0433E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.2645E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.304E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
83.101
Magnitude:
88
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Jack Reed
Mr. GORTON addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0079881305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003802111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026168347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008476661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003071199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001830879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.1744E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.33899E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.25358E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.4044E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.335E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0915471523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0173857159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0123031408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0077058394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006252905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002509351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001704941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.13543E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.38493E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.0296E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.1685E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
81.885
Magnitude:
60
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Slade Gorton
Mr. President, Senate Joint Resolution 18 almost certainly represents the most serious and fundamental attack on first amendment rights of free speech in the 210-year history of that first amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.196
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0020826699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014248333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010272943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006838829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.28501E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.06612E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.0106E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.84805E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.8365E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.4302E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.613E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.9
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Slade Gorton
Senate Joint Resolution 18 is not aimed at the entire ambit of free speech rights. It in no way grants Congress authority over obscenity, over beer advertising, over fine arts. It is focused solely on allowing the Congress sweeping authority over the freedom of political speech, not just of politicians but of all citizens and of the news media that serve those citizens.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1109468169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0779717811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0076644181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013866209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000685824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002641041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000161263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.60983E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1688E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.4317E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.416E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Slade Gorton
The first Congress of the United States responded to the most serious objection to the ratification of our Constitution that was presented during those ratification debates -- the absence of a bill of rights and, most particularly, the absence of a constitutional guarantee of free speech.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.761
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0137088879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0029957242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010147056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005387195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004170111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001009508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001008587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.7118E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.5981E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.3597E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2332E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Slade Gorton
When James Madison and his colleagues drafted the first amendment and worked on its protection of free speech, they were not concerned, Mr. President, about defending obscenity. They were not concerned with limitations on beer advertising. They were not concerned with playwrights. They were concerned with debate over the political future of the people of the United States of America.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.70805
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.36772
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4623066634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1826762804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1453906414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.019662347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0195752888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095878975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033642449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020944532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012239335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.22384E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.04579E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Slade Gorton
They believed, as did almost all of the citizens who worried about a new Constitution, that the new Government might, like its British predecessors, attempt to gag newspapers and individuals in their pursuit of a free and open debate over matters political. So they wrote a first amendment that was unconditional in that respect. They wrote a first amendment that said, "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . ." They did not write, as this resolution would, in paraphrase, "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech except such restrictions as Congress may deem reasonable." Mr. President, you and I and all the other Members of this body and every American who has ever run for office recognizes that, other than that vitally important meeting of people as individuals on a one-to-one basis, doorbelling, canvassing, and the like, important even to those of us who run for the U.S. Senate but obviously an impossible tactic when one represents hundreds of thousands or millions of voters, that there are fundamentally four ways in which we can communicate political ideas in the course of the campaign to the people who are constituents or whom we seek to represent.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.31568
VADER
0.832
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0958875928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0125453371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0102949452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023883184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009010808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003753823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002036064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001747189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.05777E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.78653E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.456E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
46
Sprache Difficult Word Count
56
Slade Gorton
The first of those, Mr. President, is through our own campaign committees. "Gorton '94," "McConnell '96," "Hollings '98," formally organized and set up, receiving campaign contributions, writing advertisements, scheduling the candidates, doing so in a fairly transparent fashion. That is the first one.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1732842298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0138494492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0041563708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002612728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011870617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008238908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001964168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001243796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0413E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6406E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1334E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
63.203
Magnitude:
94
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Slade Gorton
The second way which our ideas can be communicated to those whom we seek to represent is through the party organizations with which we are affiliated. All candidates for Federal office are members of organized political parties. Most candidates for State office and many for local office are as well. In fact, in almost every State the only identifier on the ballot in addition to the name of the candidate is the political party that candidate identifies with. So the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, and the Socialist Worker Party also, involves itself in campaigns communicating en mass in the ways that they consider to be most effective with the voters.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.964
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0752503285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.021492911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0206120181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0187935337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027001573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006285045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001576367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.42135E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.84561E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.18252E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.9003E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
63.122
Magnitude:
195
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Slade Gorton
The third way of communicating political ideas, Mr. President, is by the independent activity of individuals or organizations who are not, under most circumstances, directly connected with either the candidate or with any political party but who have a vital interest, on behalf of themselves as individuals or as members of organizations in which they are a part in the political future of the country, in who is elected to particular offices.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.825
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.071587821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0208018711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0141629294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0128900749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0055908429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035159956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001726328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001303494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.48327E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.8595E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.817E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
78.914
Magnitude:
148
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Slade Gorton
As I say, they may be individuals, they may be very wealthy individuals, they may be organizations from one end of the political spectrum to another, but they communicate quite freely and without any censorship from Congress their ideas about political elections, their support for candidates, their opposition to candidates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.865
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3727884032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.199984503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1560526551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0495107961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0062100044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0043929907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017840561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001413587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.23043E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.78346E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.1156E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
79.376
Magnitude:
157
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Slade Gorton
Finally, the fourth way in which political ideas about elections get to the voters is through our mass media -- through radio, television and the newspapers -- many of which are vitally interested in these ideas, many of which literally editorialize and endorse, but even when they don't, they communicate such ideas as they deem relevant in explaining the positions of the various candidates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.468
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.021051419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0128830099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0124418715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0074396929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0050212773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002857155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000151142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000112347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.86538E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.506E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7146E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
42.428
Magnitude:
42
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
20.729
Magnitude:
42
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Slade Gorton
Senate Joint Resolution 18 is, I must say, philosophically consistent and intellectually honest in that it permits Congress to regulate all four of those activities. It allows Congress to put reasonable limits on contributions or expenditures by, in support of, or in opposition to candidates for Federal office. That covers the candidates' committees, that covers the political parties, that covers the totally independent individuals and groups, and that covers the newspapers and television stations and radio stations that participate in these political campaigns.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.82455
VADER
0.878
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0156540948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0154266265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0076103854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023216464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012859785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000828158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002364031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.26068E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.5721E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4179E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.35E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
11.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Slade Gorton
I say, Mr. President, that this proposal is philosophically consistent and logical and principled in making no real distinction among those four methods of contribution, because, of course, the present campaign law does not. The law under which we operate today puts very real limits on candidates' campaign organizations, limits which, by the operation of inflation, have grown smaller in each successive election cycle on contributions from organizations or from individuals to those candidates, significant disclosure requirements on the source of those contributions, so significant that on many occasions, it would seem that our newspapers spend more time and more column inches reporting contributions than they do on reporting ideas.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.72727
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.72727
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.71765
VADER
0.178
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0369719317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0316315942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0149072264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0089597954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034644298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033237007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012709338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.17482E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.55171E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.66323E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.754E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
14.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Slade Gorton
The 1974 law imposes some, but vaguer, restrictions on contributions to and expenditures by political parties. It was unable, as a matter of constitutional law, to impose any significant restrictions on independent expenditures, and it made no attempt to impose any restrictions on the news media, recognizing even then the unconstitutionality of doing so.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.16705
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.6783885881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0739898533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0455885718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0129132153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0083675142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014906775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011960569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001876569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001516065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.07771E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.10357E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
64.973
Magnitude:
106
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
7.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Slade Gorton
What has been the net impact of the set of restrictions that we have today? In almost direct ratio to the restrictions on the amount of money that individuals and organizations can contribute to candidates, it has caused those individuals and organizations, when they feel passionately about a candidate, either for or against, to funnel their contributions to the political parties whom they know would support those candidates. And so we have the challenge of soft money today, largely because those who contribute soft money to political parties cannot contribute that money in hard form to the candidates themselves.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.72727
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.72727
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.71765
VADER
0.889
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0185972196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0145561629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0100395475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.005076018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009241996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001625069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.86207E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.55332E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.195E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.805E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
65.005
Magnitude:
47
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Slade Gorton
This, all by itself, has made political campaigns less satisfactory and candidates less responsible. Each of us as a candidate is responsible directly for the way in which he or she conducts his or her campaign. When our name is on the disclaimer of a television ad, we cannot disown it. When we have reported a contribution from an individual or a group, we cannot disown it. But even when that advertisement or that political activity comes from our political party, we can, to a certain extent, disassociate ourselves from the ideas or the messages involved. We may very well, we hope, benefit from it when they support us, but we cannot guarantee that we will gain such a benefit.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.82455
VADER
0.958
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0393640279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0381228485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0158041352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0030887328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028227236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023088072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005756506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.44117E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9094E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.7679E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.983E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Slade Gorton
Now we have waiting in the wings, subject to validation only, I believe, if we adopt this constitutional amendment, a set of similar restrictions on political parties. If we adopt such a system of restrictions on political parties, Mr. President, it seems to me we know clearly what will happen, because it is already happening. Those same groups, those same individuals who feel passionately about Federal elections today and who are barred from providing the support they want to provide to the candidate directly, are barred from providing that support to the candidate's political party, will simply do it on their own.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.47368
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.47368
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.9694
VADER
0.965
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0296198996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0239897228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0179344206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0150659456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0081192557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054774133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0043996111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.44273E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.93743E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.6206E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.8416E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Slade Gorton
Last Sunday's Washington Post had an interesting article about the 1996 campaigns, the headline of which is: "For Their Targets, Mystery Groups' Ads Hit Like Attacks From Nowhere." The airwaves were filled with this kind of activity at the end of 1996 -- organizations with fictional names engaged mostly in negative advertising against particular candidates, the source of support for which was unknown and, therefore, the responsibility for the content of which was unknown. But as long as we have a Congress that impinges on every aspect of our social and individual and economic lives, we will have individuals who wish to participate and will participate in that fashion if they are not allowed to participate more directly and more openly.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.78947
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.78947
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.691
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0448310486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0259786611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0244652794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.019050522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0115928196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0045436154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028409255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.57816E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.30894E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.56964E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.527E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
22.876
Magnitude:
4
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
Slade Gorton
So Senate Joint Resolution 18 very clearly will allow Congress to put limits on that kind of political participation. So it will say, in the ultimate analysis, we can do whatever we think is reasonable to shut people up when it comes to political debates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.632
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0217525318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0199186179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0089203844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0084706124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0039358794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030868185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016627921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.64807E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.58587E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.7555E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.901E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
20.093
Magnitude:
3
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Slade Gorton
Now, that still leaves the fourth element of communication: the radio, television stations, and the newspapers of this country. Very likely, the first bill that went through Congress after this constitutional amendment passed would not affect them, but they would sure be in clover, Mr. President, because then, with the candidate and the candidate's supporters and the candidate's proponents all muzzled, the only source of information would be the mass news media.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.042217772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0126956802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028759559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005761938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000554531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005157523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.9485E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.02461E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.6328E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.3371E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5147E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
41.229
Magnitude:
26
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Slade Gorton
But now this passionately devoted and wealthy individual or this passionately devoted organization would soon find the answer to that question: Buy a newspaper; buy a television station. Then you are entirely free to spend all the money you want on political communication, totally divorced from any responsibility on the part of the candidate at all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.748
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0053367159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0052180763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0046587422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028793123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012271733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006461391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004661926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.09873E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.05256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.6373E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.252E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Slade Gorton
So the next law, Mr. President, will limit what the newspapers and the television stations and radio stations can do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2039110055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0879172934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0266605697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.010093629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018645645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016395707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002922618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000143274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2052E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6138E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.24E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
82.71
Magnitude:
43
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Mitch McConnell
Will the Senator yield?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0357774494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0336273428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0097533681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0077189521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063357635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0033556127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006680091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003196421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.44444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.4564E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2693E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
74.274
Magnitude:
16
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Slade Gorton
I am happy to yield to the Senator.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0615789031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0430911867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0090679954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018811086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013758303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001095375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001733392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001147691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4461E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.69288E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.5492E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
68.025
Magnitude:
24
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
82.4
Gunning-Fog Score
3.2
Coleman-Liau Index
4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Mitch McConnell
There is a bill we will be discussing later this year called McCain-Feingold, which seeks, in this Senator's judgment, to essentially shut down legislative-advocacy-type independent expressions and to make almost impossible the ability of outside groups to engage in independent expenditures.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.528
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0499072426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0458816008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031590087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0027443466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021939864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018905648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004043376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001247665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.38533E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.54808E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.4237E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
56.935
Magnitude:
26
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
4.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Mitch McConnell
My question to my friend from Washington is, given the fact that we have bills that go that far now, given this authority under this constitutional amendment to set "reasonable limits," is it not possible that Congress might decide such expenditures should be shut down entirely, that there is nothing reasonable about them, and that those voices should be quieted altogether?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.494
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.024674731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0110705289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.003348101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024174476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009500292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002703496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001544278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.01712E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.6685E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.7769E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.82E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
31.509
Magnitude:
24
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
23.954
Magnitude:
24
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
21.614
Magnitude:
24
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
6.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Slade Gorton
Congress, if this should be part of the Constitution, might well make just such a decision on the relatively rational grounds that all political speech they want to be directly attributable to candidates and not to permit anyone to engage in a partisan political debate except through the candidate's committees.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.038477761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0331894727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0249737059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0080871876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021893862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014839428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002942158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.73988E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.62886E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.7744E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.1345E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
63.96
Magnitude:
87
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
20.088
Magnitude:
87
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
10.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Slade Gorton
Now, I must say to my friend from Kentucky, I doubt that would happen in the Congress immediately after the adoption of a constitutional amendment like this. The sponsors of this constitutional amendment are all supporters of the McCain-Feingold proposal, and my inclination is that they would be content with the passage of that legislation with this constitutional provision in effect.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
2.6877649128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1088362653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0890831812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0238340523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001404165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003269167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002291754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002210391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001033979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.75124E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4449E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
54.077
Magnitude:
24
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Slade Gorton
They know, or at least the most thoughtful and principled of them know, that McCain-Feingold is blatantly unconstitutional under the first amendment as the first amendment exists today. I rather imagine they would be satisfied with this reform as their predecessors were satisfied with the 1974 reforms. As soon as this reform showed itself to be as ineffective as 1974 has, as soon as it had pushed communication into another channel, they would be back to close off that channel.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.788
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1076247892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0579095155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0147456929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0070868948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.006100228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038479327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011293256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003907052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001035527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.74559E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.20815E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
69.856
Magnitude:
72
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.8
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Slade Gorton
At the present time, their frustration stems almost entirely from the fact that they are only permitted to dam one channel of the river, and all the water just goes around the other side of the island and flows into the political system to the same extent or to a greater extent than it does at the present time. This constitutional amendment allows them to dam the whole river for good and permanently.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0691004214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0582151581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0174815665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0039956249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0037221405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032228305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010184196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001928964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001784455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.48007E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.2048E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
85.552
Magnitude:
101
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Slade Gorton
It is for exactly that reason that I say, Mr. President, this is certainly the most fundamental attack on the most fundamental of American freedoms that has taken place in this body in the 14-plus years during which I have served and, I think, probably in the 210 years since the first amendment was adopted by the first Congress.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.291
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3643001895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0226178454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0203806529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022633942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021949785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004492679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002150942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.54036E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.63007E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.31448E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5468E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
58.504
Magnitude:
24
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Mitch McConnell
Will the Senator yield?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3157019848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0459917501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0284809415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0120357778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0029074678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028941977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012594497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000106523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.82178E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0691E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.712E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
87.667
Magnitude:
72
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Slade Gorton
I am happy to yield to the Senator.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.0822623037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0355477765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0249911856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039441005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004223079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002845623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002583245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.53051E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.80266E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.9594E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.70326E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
89.685
Magnitude:
86
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
82.4
Gunning-Fog Score
3.2
Coleman-Liau Index
4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Mitch McConnell
Since the Congress composed entirely of incumbents has the power to determine what is a reasonable limit directly on campaigns, would it not be entirely conceivable, I ask my friend from Washington, in the very near future, if not in the very same Congress, after this became part of the Constitution, that these incumbents might seek to limit spending in campaigns directly by the candidates themselves standing for reelection and a challenger, quite dramatically?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0276616163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0116300769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010140217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007649294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002848778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
5.00926E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.91623E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.3783E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.5129E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7615E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.261E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
59.704
Magnitude:
67
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Mitch McConnell
Most incumbents start out with a pretty substantial lead unless they are running against a famous athlete, a movie star, or sitting Governor. It has often been described as the incumbent looking at it as a football field, and the incumbent at the beginning of the campaign is at the 40-yard line and sprinting toward the goalline; the challenger is back on the 5-yard line with 95 yards to go. Might not this Congress composed entirely of incumbents decide to set a spending limit of, say, $50,000 per House of Representatives race and declare that reasonable?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0598331098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0207168981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0194238877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0054914035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037818427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008028186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.71326E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.30629E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.02143E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.70661E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2801E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
83.94
Magnitude:
58
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Slade Gorton
Congress would certainly have the authority to pass just such a law, I say, Mr. President, to my friend from Kentucky. I think as a former State attorney general, he has argued a number of cases in the Supreme Court. I would probably be willing to take that challenge on a reasonable basis to the Supreme Court of the United States, and I might well win at that $50,000 figure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.963
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.1822792701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0147088867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0070730806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005736516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004335785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028429204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000957263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001001571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.65138E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.50615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0593E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
93.068
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Slade Gorton
But the vice of this constitutional amendment is that I would have to do that in the first place, and there would be an argument that that was a reasonable limitation. When we start down this road, we put the right of free speech and political matters of the people of the United States into the hands of Congress.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4735399969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0129329812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0115169794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0082690676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.006803243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031064745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004906994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002053701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.41087E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.66992E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6457E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
69.784
Magnitude:
113
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Slade Gorton
As the Senator from New Mexico said earlier, each of us believes sufficiently in this system to hold the opinion that most of the time we do the right thing and that almost all of the time we try to do the right thing. We are probably least likely to do the right thing when it affects our own individual fates and our own individual careers. Even when we are, we sometimes, at least, can make mistakes. That, I must say, is obviously the reason that Madison and the first Congress wrote the first amendment in unequivocal terms with a primary focus on political speech. They simply did not wish to give this authority to Congress, and they were right.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.64706
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.64706
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.42139
VADER
-0.459
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1139365253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0090483438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0046734345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.004331689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012184422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005037267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004613716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002167667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.08796E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.21619E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.018E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Slade Gorton
That is the central issue here. Is this a matter that is up to the judgment of the people as individuals and as members of organizations? Or is it up to the Government -- in this case a self-interested Government -- to say what is reasonable? You and I, Mr. President, and the Senator from Kentucky and I believe that this is a matter for people as individuals and as members of voluntary associations. The proponents of this constitutional amendment believe this is a matter for the Government. Between us, there is a great gulf fixed which cannot be bridged. We stand on the Constitution as it was written by the Founding Fathers. We stand on a faith in the people, and we reject the interference of the Federal Government on this question.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.677
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
3.7698440254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1108114608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0336182246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0093848488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027155169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007760799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003718687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000281777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001470998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.40148E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9095E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
11.6
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, I want to thank the distinguished Senator from Washington for his eloquent defense of the first amendment. He certainly encapsulated, better than I could ever, exactly what the heart of this debate is. I thank him very much for his support and contribution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.952
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.4718874358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.086245453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.022308559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0129788779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0075946613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013020371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002603572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.8026E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.29238E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.82642E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.45223E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
68.708
Magnitude:
165
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Mitch McConnell
I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.032419528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.006021664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0041728923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035858462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020386191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008996477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004464847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002587715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.51918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.23851E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.7899E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.306
Magnitude:
124
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Mitch McConnell
Mr. McCAIN addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
5.6243281811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.3767897142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0787838188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0211822538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0052408315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012488553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001764083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001412127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.23332E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.41677E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.36035E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
69.063
Magnitude:
204
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Kempthorne). The Senator from Arizona.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.3743403126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0497194065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0271678378
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0221387454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0147684739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042601696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0014527759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003007153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.13814E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.60683E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4097E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
90.795
Magnitude:
180
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.2
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
John McCain
Mr. President, daily we are learning of new allegations and revelations regarding how last year's elections were financed. Just yesterday, we learned that the Chinese Government created a $1.8 million fund with which it sought to influence up to 30 Members of Congress with campaign contributions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0470398692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0124956961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0055165816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025371017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001276816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007920835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.38132E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.56891E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.12862E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.4817E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8883E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
62.854
Magnitude:
128
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.503
Magnitude:
128
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
John McCain
The Congress now faces a monumental task. How can the system be effectively and fairly changed? The answer is both simple and daunting: by passing comprehensive, bipartisan campaign finance reform. Some openly oppose campaign finance reform. One of the leaders, if not the leader, my friend, Senator McConnell, is there. I admire him and respect the fact that he is a standup guy. He does not hide that fact. Others have said to me, "I am for campaign finance reform, just not yours." I challenge my colleagues and say that every aspect of Senator Feingold's and my bill is open for debate. Everyone is welcome at the table. I believe there is no excuse for inaction.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.926
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
25.2597689629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0639688747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0534332416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0234929656
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0078964666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007028568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001627572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.98136E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.2534E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1621E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.717E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
96.444
Magnitude:
135
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67
Gunning-Fog Score
7.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
9.2
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
John McCain
Real reform must do two things. It must limit the influence of money in campaigns, and it must level the playing field between challengers and incumbents. I believe those two principles cannot be compromised, but the rest is up for negotiation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
13.8677284122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.0447590612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.111293816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0302166562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025535956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015443304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003181813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.33134E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.3006E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.677E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.341E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
93.643
Magnitude:
66
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
John McCain
I find that there are fewer and fewer Americans -- in fact, recent polls show that 9 out of 10 Americans believe that we must repair this system and that it is out of control. I just heard my colleagues talking about how in 1974 it didn't work, and if we passed further campaign finance reform, somehow that would be bad, as it was bad in 1974.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
-0.791
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0590882206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0402473932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0130883695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0066723711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017710254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
6.32026E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.70437E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.4441E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3228E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.403E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.114E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
81.737
Magnitude:
28
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
John McCain
Now, Mr. President, I wasn't in Congress in 1974, but I am very aware that, in 1972, there were people walking around this town with valises full of hundred dollar bills. The stories I have heard concerned people being asked to contribute 1 or 2 percent of their gross income. Somehow to allege that the changes made in 1974 didn't help reform the system I think, frankly, flies in the face of facts. The facts are that, as a result of the 1974 reforms, we did fix the system for quite a while. Mr. President, when I was elected to Congress in 1982, there was a far different environment than exists today in fundraising. The fact is, it worked for quite a while, and then loopholes were exploited, Supreme Court decisions gave additional avenues for the funneling of so-called "soft money" into campaigns, and it is out of control again.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.631
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0699253927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.042911747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0362896273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018606834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017274335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015182772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00041892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001920982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001640769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.47611E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7515E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
58.393
Magnitude:
91
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38
John McCain
Mr. President, in 1986, we reformed the tax system in this country -- supported overwhelmingly here in Congress -- and closed some tax loopholes. We took several million people off the tax rolls, and it was generally applauded. We fixed the system to a significant degree. We all know now, in 1997, we need to fix the tax system again. I say to you, in 1974, much needed reforms were enacted by an overwhelming majority of Congress. They did some good things. It did clean up the system dramatically.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.1431
VADER
0.866
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1554850256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0877689046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0199831236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0158208713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0044309207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006746102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005251057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.04282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.11493E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.71653E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.2206E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
71.436
Magnitude:
117
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.4
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
4.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
John McCain
Now circumstances and times have changed. We all know the problems, Mr. President. We all know the problems. They are made abundantly clear by picking up any newspaper today. The pursuit of funds and money has become a full-time occupation, and the average citizen no longer has the same voice in Washington, DC, that they did years ago.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.612
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.9924842976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.5452829413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1161011169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0472004205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0129324762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000406421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001358497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.93075E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.7679E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6143E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2812E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.917
Magnitude:
44
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
John McCain
Earlier this week, a man who I have not only grown to respect and admire enormously, but I have also become a good friend with over the many years I have been here and worked very closely with, is Senator Ford from the other side of the aisle. I think many would describe Senator Ford, with admiration, as a partisan member of his party. I also know that there are many others of us who have had the opportunity of working with him for many, many years. If you want to reach a legislative result and you want to reach it in a nonpartisan and, if necessary, bipartisan fashion, you sit down with Wendell Ford, along with, by the way, my friend from South Carolina, Senator Hollings. Example: At the end of last year, we were able to pass legislation which was the most massive change in aviation, how we fund and structure it, since 1978 when we deregulated the airline industry. Wendell Ford, acting in a bipartisan fashion, made that legislation possible. I intend, as is appropriate, when the time comes, to elaborate on my feelings of affection and respect for Senator Ford.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.29584
VADER
0.991
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
40.2886480093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.950791128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0116033691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0089880705
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035903697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010363491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010252927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.94131E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.78582E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.92734E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.069E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
53.448
Magnitude:
39
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
48
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
John McCain
One of the things Senator Ford mentioned as the reason why he was not going to seek reelection was because he was going to have to raise $100,000 a week between now and election day. He also added, in his own inimitable style, that his wife would not allow him to rent out the spare bedroom. But the fact is, Mr. President, that every time one of our Members leaves this body, they cite the money chase. They cite the problem that money has become the overriding factor in the determination of candidacy and outcome. That should not be, Mr. President.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
-0.068
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
78.8530945778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.0087751597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.8330880664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.5590349436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0606117013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0034952882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013374274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009651463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009101785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002749453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.7673E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
35.732
Magnitude:
85
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
John McCain
Ask anyone who is considering running for public office. They come here to Washington, DC, because they need the support of the party people and the money and the PAC's and the interest groups, and they will tell you they are only asked one question when they announce they are going to seek election, and one question only. It's not, "How do you stand on taxes?" or "on the role of Government," or "how do you feel about national defense?" There is only one question they are asked, Mr. President: "Where are you going to get the money?" When we get into a full-blown debate on this issue -- which I hope we will because I still hold the fervent hope and belief that we will address campaign finance reform on this floor in one way or another before this year is out, and I don't know when that will be -- I suggest that it will only be done in a meaningful fashion when there is sufficient anger and outrage on the part of the American people who demand that we fix this broken system, and not until.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.04
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.04
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.07696
VADER
0.879
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1134064165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0205696881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041841893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037494156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031216674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005505674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002916532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.72716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.64845E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.5626E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.174E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
45.959
Magnitude:
10
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
25.848
Magnitude:
10
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
10.7
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
John McCain
I don't think we really ought to debate this until we are ready to achieve a legislative result. I don't know when that will be, Mr. President. But I can tell you, we are a heck of a lot closer to that point than we were, say, 6 months ago. I believe 3 months from now, or 2 months from now -- after the hearings Senator Thompson is going to be holding -- there will be a much greater impetus and desire on the part of the American people that we more thoroughly and completely address this issue and try to fix the broken system. I believe that we can and should and will. It used to be that we waged a battle of ideas between candidates. The battle was well fought and hard won on the election battlefield. Now it is the battle of the bucks.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0102507263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034185974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020879219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011949384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002436035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.8598E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.91099E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.2344E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.0604E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3554E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.474E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
96.6
Magnitude:
92
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
9.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
John McCain
Again, at an appropriate time, I will talk about the well-known public facts and how much campaign costs have risen, how much it costs to run a Senate race, how much it costs in order to buy television, and how much soft money has grown in exponential numbers to the point where, according to the Washington Post not long ago, the cost of Federal campaigns was well over $2 billion, whether they be small States or large States.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.16705
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4609549884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0379894889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0374135707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0190827181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.012895251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028075901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007864241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002684339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.6203E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.13505E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1588E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
56.006
Magnitude:
160
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
John McCain
Mr. President, I do not believe that the constitutional amendment is the answer. We can enact campaign finance reform without a constitutional amendment. S. 25, the McCain-Feingold bill, is fully consistent with the law. I can point out many more constitutional scholars, including a former chief counsel of the ACLU, as to constitutionality because it is based primarily on voluntary spending limits.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.381952012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.015630947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0086099855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0066689681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0052053478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004873626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.6515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2342E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.1267E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.6795E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.325E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
53.919
Magnitude:
82
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
John McCain
The Supreme Court has ruled that we cannot stop someone who is willing to spend an unlimited amount of money to campaign for a Federal office from doing so.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.606
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
5.4687105119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.3256152384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.2245035022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1614305889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0441398908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0314928184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026670898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003427554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002086015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001419927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.04482E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
54.252
Magnitude:
39
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
27.06
Magnitude:
39
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
John McCain
This bill provides strong incentives for candidates to voluntarily comply with spending limits regardless of personal wealth. Candidates who choose to spend unlimited amounts of their own money receive none of the benefits under our legislation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.809
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0222291274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0100481855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0061773062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012098393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005800432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003286043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001505298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001395737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001104358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.62054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.189E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
86.033
Magnitude:
75
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.5
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
John McCain
Mr. President, there is an argument that is being bandied about that somehow we cannot place a limit on soft money, that it would be unconstitutional to do so. I find that curious. I find that curious because the courts have clearly allowed the Congress to place limits on contributions to campaigns. We have placed an individual limit of $2,000. We placed a PAC limit of $10,000. We do not allow a corporation or a union to provide any direct contributions. Yet somehow people on this floor are saying somehow it would be unconstitutional to place limits on soft money. There is no rational constitutional argument there in my view. There is no justifiable need for soft money. All contributions made to the party should be done using hard, fully traceable, fully disclosed dollars. There is no constitutional right to soft money. The courts have stated that any contribution can be limited.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-3.13549
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.23077
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.23077
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.435
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1920773531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1622078824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0314141304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0050595139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0039088809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031431486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013705279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0006748541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005188208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002568655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.04358E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
67.873
Magnitude:
68
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
35
John McCain
I will submit for the Record those court decisions that have stated that any contribution can be limited.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.226
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
3.6620303988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0704028469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0442274119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0171382693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004536688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019878131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00028899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001609566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.87323E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.6899E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4336E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
66.82
Magnitude:
81
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
John McCain
As you know, Mr. President, my good friend Paul Taylor has worked tirelessly to promote the idea of free broadcast time. Broadcasters use spectrum that is owned by the American people. As such, the Congress and the courts have agreed that when the Government gives out licenses to the broadcasters -- enabling them to operate -- that such licenses may be conditioned on certain activities deemed to be in the public interest.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.953
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0755091431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0455141446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0133633657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040362655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0038414506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035386405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016311522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009034625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003703659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002031025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001959466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
66.569
Magnitude:
75
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
20.23
Magnitude:
75
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
John McCain
When each broadcaster receives a license, they sign on that license that they agree to act in the public interest.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0871420489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0093748218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0080307029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0053330732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014410401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007254921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.57472E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.45302E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.3317E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.924E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.858E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
34.309
Magnitude:
90
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
32.888
Magnitude:
90
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
John McCain
Some of the opponents of the McCain-Feingold legislation complain incorrectly that the bill will limit individuals free speech. As I have just explained, the bill is compatible with the Constitution. But there is even a greater question that must be asked. If spending is akin to free speech, then how much speech does an individual without means have? If money is free speech, how much free speech does a person without money have?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.927
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1803744934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0574549544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0259934488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0180700765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0048691592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007903344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000225659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001902332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001750768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.49892E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.91104E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
54.85
Magnitude:
85
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
20.075
Magnitude:
85
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
John McCain
On March 2, on CNN a woman from Bartlesville, OK, called in, and, said, "I have a question for you. I'm a Republican, supposedly. I'm more Independent than anything else. But I want to ask you something. At $735 a month, how much freedom of speech do I have? I cannot contribute to these big campaigns." Mr. President, men and women all over America ask in response to the equation of money and free speech about how much freedom of speech they have if they are a moderate- or low-income American. Where is her voice? Where is the voice of the woman from Bartlesville, OK? What can be done to ensure that her voice is not overwhelmed by the voices of monied special interests?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.978
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.027378404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0188478007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0168658546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.011631674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0052977884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0051962077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005139122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001937094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.83379E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57988E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.1123E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
34.281
Magnitude:
51
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.8
Gunning-Fog Score
7.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
John McCain
Spending limits will do more to both level the playing field between challengers and incumbents and give a voice to individuals who either give little or can afford to give nothing at all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0808346667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0559840002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0528721488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0190980078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0154847643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0143620535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0021029753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004644809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003922501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003111203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002770904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
33.745
Magnitude:
6
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
John McCain
The most money tends to win elections. And this is the incumbent protection system. The reality is that the current, perverse system under which the richest takes all has resulted in entrenched incumbents.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0221312526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0104228042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095144162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0054079061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026516498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015119903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.60765E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.22584E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.48281E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.20797E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.13092E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
74.432
Magnitude:
22
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
John McCain
The Congressional Research Service has compiled an analysis of congressional races in recent years, and the conclusion of that study is that the candidate who raises and spends the most money, even if that money is his or her own, usually wins the elections. As I have said before, elections should be about message and ideas. I do not believe it was an accident that in the last election we had the lowest voter turnout in any time in the history of Presidential elections in this century.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1598113333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1190842595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0371812843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0342671701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0133925278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.010967275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016061642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006355518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.00984E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.30021E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.78798E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
95.594
Magnitude:
103
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
John McCain
Mr. President, I have a letter from Common Cause. I quote:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0802931318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0152240915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0132400164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0101837635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0081352446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030984949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003152689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.02219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.00361E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.45929E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.68E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
95.4
Gunning-Fog Score
1.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
John McCain
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that this letter be made part of the Record.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0809383695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0596784521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0437215407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0242871116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0138221396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007921514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003136268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001550722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.93719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.55697E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.89443E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
30.561
Magnitude:
17
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
John McCain
Mr. President, I also would like at this time to have printed in the Record by unanimous consent a letter that is by Mr. Burt Neuborne who is the Legal Director at the Brennan Center for Justice.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.807
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.7495418657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2745057223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0233693543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0180761417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0140231175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020612924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007807939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002164082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.20339E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.04488E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.50556E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
39.794
Magnitude:
102
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
32.273
Magnitude:
102
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
4.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
John McCain
Mr. President, the reason I asked that the letter be included in the Record is that he says:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.018153766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.007066103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027124914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002416618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003854631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002492481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.23729E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.0685E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.04E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.491E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.532E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
77.403
Magnitude:
38
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.9
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
1.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
John McCain
Mr. President, I think it is an interesting rebuttal to the position that the ACLU has taken on S. 25.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0079100842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0070112117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0043795597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0037273941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0029650228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0023080567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007927893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007682155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003373875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001928501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5462E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
John McCain
I would also like to point out that I have great respect for the ACLU. But there are very few occasions on which I have agreed with the positions that the ACLU has taken on a broad variety of issues.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.896
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3326240228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1539966441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0545545656
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0114588336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0064440988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009365554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001535455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.90518E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.07844E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.04251E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.8383E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
66.956
Magnitude:
44
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
John McCain
We can argue the constitutionality of this issue, and, if we win, we will get into the major debate. But I will have a very large body of constitutional opinion -- not just the ACLU -- as to the constitutionality of the McCain-Feingold bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-2.19722
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0802065653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0207052857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0130181943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0125833161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0062874271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0046177523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0045000932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011983551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000607129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004227564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003132755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
John McCain
I also suggest again that we have to clean up this system. It is broken. It is out of control. Almost every American agrees with that. Poll after poll after poll is telling us that the American people are cynical about us, the way we are selected, and the system under which money seems to be the determinant factor in the selection of our public servants.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
-0.317
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1236093463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0404803606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054921631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001301445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011676021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003310275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001963432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.50367E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.52397E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.85119E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.639E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
John McCain
I will continue to seek support both inside the Halls of Congress and outside the beltway, and I and Senator Feingold fully intend to bring this bill up this year. The ideal way that we would seek to do that would be us all sitting down together and coming up with a package as we did on the gift ban, as we did on lobbying reform, as we did on the line-item veto, as we have on a broad variety of reforms we have enacted by near unanimous if not total unanimous agreement.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.535
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2241158159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.120209856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0236256514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0115414077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043658074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041488944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010392975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002598229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000185368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.10312E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.27558E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.019
Magnitude:
189
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
John McCain
My message to those who say I am now in favor of campaign finance reform is, as you know, so am I, so are many others, so are most Americans. So let us sit down adhering to principles and recognize what the problems are and sit down as mature individuals and move forward and reform this system for the benefit not only of those of us who have the honor and opportunity to serve today but provide an opportunity for dedicated and outstanding young men and women to serve this Nation in the future in elected office.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.964
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.019645576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026658387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0017710947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000971812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002076401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
9.05893E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.70069E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.60576E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0089E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.559E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.974E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.943
Magnitude:
7
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
John McCain
I intend to continue to conduct this debate with respect and appreciation for the views of my colleague from Kentucky, Senator McConnell, who disagrees with me, my colleague from the State of Washington, Senator Gorton, and others. I believe that we can strongly disagree on this issue and respect each other's views, and I think the American people deserve a debate that is conducted in an environment of mutual respect. I am happy to say that at least in my view we have conducted this debate on that level during this period of time, recognizing that it is a very emotional issue on both sides. But I think the American people will be far better off if we continue to conduct this debate on the Hollings bill today as well as our overall debate on campaign finance reform in that vein in the future, and I commit to my colleagues that I will conduct it in that fashion.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36364
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36364
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.72594
VADER
0.966
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0082830833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0077168181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0035799829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032133386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010585421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008435349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006697134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003164111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001324363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.03555E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5967E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.422
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
45
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
John McCain
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0454433495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0440833537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010337728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000846951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007946499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002290863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001016023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.8895E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.7889E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2186E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.924E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
John McCain
Mr. SESSIONS addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
1.4902834781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0165078993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0080193546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0039690407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034034681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020711484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017118882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0007322695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002601855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.58981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6867E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0780270784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0132920832
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0098864773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047647009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018207771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007012259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003436726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003423014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.97415E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.01388E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.21244E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
68.444
Magnitude:
52
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12