Fact
ba
.
se
Donald J. Trump
Press Briefing: Russell Vought Speaks to Reporters Outside the White House - May 22, 2025
StressLens
3 Topics
9 Entities
Moderation
2 Speakers
Entities
bill
budget
negativity
people
Republican Party (United States)
something
United States Senate
way
world
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Russell Vought Russell Vought said 93 sentences of a total of 126 sentences.
74%
Russell Vought said 1407 words of a total of 1794 words.
79%
Russell Vought talked 393 seconds of a total of 496 seconds.
80%
Question Question said 33 sentences of a total of 126 sentences.
27%
Question said 387 words of a total of 1794 words.
22%
Question talked 101 seconds of a total of 496 seconds.
21%
Full Transcript
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
0
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Question
00:00:00-00:00:05 (6 sec)No StressLens
What's your reaction to, uh, the X message by Elon Musk?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88
Gunning-Fog Score
4.4
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
2.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Russell Vought
00:00:05-00:00:32 (26 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, we think the bill is a very good one. We think it's very strong fiscally. Uh, nothing's changed from our view of the world. We understand where he's coming from. But, uh, if you -- if you have an accurate baseline, uh, that treats taxes the same way it treats spending, this budget, uh, is $1.6 trillion in mandatory savings, uh, it's the most historic amount of mandatory reforms that this town has ever seen.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.809
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.622
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Government Budget
Score:
0.571
Code:
20000607
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000607
Wikidata_id:
Q271855
Wikidata_label:
government budget
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Economy > Macro Economics > Budgets and Budgeting
Score:
0.532
Code:
20000348
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000348
Wikidata_id:
Q41263
Wikidata_label:
budget
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Economy > Macro Economics > Economic Indicator > Gross Domestic Prod
Score:
0.527
Code:
20000359
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000359
Wikidata_id:
Q12638
Wikidata_label:
gross domestic product
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.517
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Russell Vought
00:00:32-00:00:47 (16 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, and certainly we haven't seen anything like it since the -- the mid-1990s with welfare reform. Uh, and it's a $1.4 trillion, uh, improvement to deficits and debt. So, look, I don't -- I don't think there's any way that you could possibly suggest this is not a fiscally responsible bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.269
Slightly Positive
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.66
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Economy
Score:
0.625
Code:
20000344
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000344
Wikidata_id:
Q159810
Wikidata_label:
economy
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.588
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Economy > Macro Economics > Credit and Debt
Score:
0.542
Code:
20000354
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000354
Wikidata_id:
Q3196867
Wikidata_label:
debt
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government Policy > Economic Policy
Score:
0.536
Code:
20000345
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000345
Wikidata_id:
Q582577
Wikidata_label:
economic policy
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Science and Technology > Social Sciences > Economics
Score:
0.536
Code:
20000745
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000745
Wikidata_id:
Q8134
Wikidata_label:
economics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Government Budget
Score:
0.528
Code:
20000607
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000607
Wikidata_id:
Q271855
Wikidata_label:
government budget
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Question
00:00:47-00:00:54 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
How are you addressing concerns from Republicans in the Senate who are concerned about the -- the impact on the deficit?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.648
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.586
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Russell Vought
00:00:54-00:01:11 (17 sec)No Signal (0)
We're working with them. Uh, we're taking their ideas. We're talking with them. Um, we're happy the votes are there. We're happy to go further in terms of finding savings. Uh, but again, uh, one of the missions that I've had is just to provide a -- a zoom out perspective historically about how much is being done in this bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
82.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Russell Vought
00:01:11-00:01:29 (18 sec)No Signal (0)
I think people should be excited about it. Uh, the people who voted for it, the fiscal hawks, uh, should be excited about this bill. If we can go further, we can go further, and I think the Senate will put their stamp on it. Um, and that work is going on and we're having a lot of conversations with Senators, and I'm very optimistic about that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.748
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Russell Vought
00:01:29-00:01:36 (7 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, but this is not something that, um, uh, there should be any negativity from a fiscal standpoint at all with regard to this bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.665
Very Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Question
00:01:36-00:01:38 (2 sec)No StressLens
Do you have any reaction to Elon Musk attacking the bill?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.459
Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Russell Vought
00:01:38-00:01:58 (20 sec)No Signal (0)
No. I said earlier, I -- you know, I'm not surprised with where he is on it. I think it's a -- a result of the -- the D.C. watchdogs, um, that are poli- -- they're either policy agnostic or have institutional ways that they look at scoring these bills that I think are flat out inaccurate. And as a result, we need to just continue to tell our story on it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.354
Somewhat Negative
Topics
Topic:
Religion > Belief Systems > Atheism and Agnosticism
Score:
0.639
Code:
20001349
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20001349
Wikidata_id:
Q7066
Wikidata_label:
atheism
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Religion
Score:
0.513
Code:
12000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/12000000
Wikidata_id:
Q9174
Wikidata_label:
religion
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Question
00:01:58-00:02:03 (4 sec)No Signal (0)
What about Elon's, uh, thread here on social media to vote out members of Congress?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Russell Vought
00:02:03-00:02:09 (7 sec)No Signal (0)
I haven't seen any, uh, thread on -- on Twitter. I'm sure I'll take a look at it, so I can't comment on it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
95.8
Gunning-Fog Score
4.6
Coleman-Liau Index
2.9
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Question
00:02:09-00:02:16 (7 sec)No Signal (0)
Are you having -- does his message, Elon Musk's message, makes your pitch to Congress, to Republicans harder?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.2
Gunning-Fog Score
6.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Russell Vought
00:02:16-00:02:34 (18 sec)No Signal (0)
I think that it's important for us to get our message out. Uh, I think we're in the process of doing that. I think the facts are on our side. Um, you know, the reality of this is we have massive levels of -- of savings in this bill, something we haven't seen in this town. Uh, are we gonna have to continue to have those conversations?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Russell Vought
00:02:34-00:02:46 (12 sec)No Signal (0)
We have not won the vote yet. Uh, but I'm -- I'm -- I'm fully confident that we will get there. And -- and I think that the -- you know, this debate will help inform the American people, and I think it's one that will be, uh, entirely constructive at the end of the day.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.834
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Question
00:02:46-00:02:54 (7 sec)No Signal (0)
Some of these lawmakers are saying they're absolutely not gonna change their mind. I mean, what are you doing? What are you saying to them to try and move the needle here?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
87.6
Gunning-Fog Score
6.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
3.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Russell Vought
00:02:54-00:03:06 (12 sec)No Signal (0)
I think that we are -- we're hearing them out. We're hearing, uh, what is their particular issues? We're hearing their ideas. Uh, we'll be having meetings all through this week, and, um, I think we'll continue to make progress.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.422
Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Question
00:03:06-00:03:10 (4 sec)No StressLens
Where are you willing -- where are you willing to make some concessions?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Russell Vought
00:03:10-00:03:27 (18 sec)No Signal (0)
I don't -- I don't think this is about concessions. I think if -- if there's a -- if there's an ability to go further, uh, and have savings that don't upset the apple cart in the House, um, I think we're open to that. But they have a three seat majority in the House. Uh, the Senate is a tight majority as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.595
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Russell Vought
00:03:27-00:03:45 (18 sec)No Signal (0)
Um, we've gotta get people comfortable what the House did in the Senate while at the same time seeing what we could do, uh, more of. And I think these are all things that, you know, I -- I said this to the Speaker yesterday, I think the process that he ran in the house, uh, was an incredible one, uh, in hearing out his members.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Russell Vought
00:03:45-00:04:00 (15 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, and at the end of the day, there, it wasn't that dramatic of a -- of a vote. I mean, they passed it. It's not like the vote was held open for a couple hours. It's because they had, had so many conversations beforehand, uh, to get to the place that they did. And I -- I think the Senate's gonna do that now.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.113
Leans Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
90.6
Gunning-Fog Score
6.9
Coleman-Liau Index
5.3
SMOG Index
7.7
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Russell Vought
00:04:00-00:04:10 (9 sec)No Signal (0)
We're a part of that and I think it's something that, uh, you know, I think by the end of this process, and hopefully by the -- you know, the -- the start of July we'll be in a good place.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.681
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.7
Coleman-Liau Index
4.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Question
00:04:11-00:04:17 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
Can you explain why to people who may say -- and not understand why you're not sending all of the DOGE cuts up to Capitol Hill?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Russell Vought
00:04:17-00:04:21 (4 sec)No Signal (0)
Yeah, I've been pretty clear about it. Uh, I wanted to make sure that they pass and so --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.852
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
5.4
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Question
00:04:21-00:04:24 (3 sec)No StressLens
Well, why can't you send all of them and get all of them to pass?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
3
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Russell Vought
00:04:24-00:04:43 (19 sec)No Signal (0)
Because I want to make sure that they -- you take the first tranche and see if it passes. The -- the -- the wider you do in terms of a package, the -- the harder it is to pass. And if it doesn't pass, this is the real world, and we will lose flexibility that we have to use executive tools to find other ways to make the DOGE cuts permanent.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Question
00:04:43-00:04:48 (5 sec)No Signal (0)
Can you explain that directly to Elon Musk. I mean, have you made this case to Elon directly?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
3.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Lifestyle and Leisure > Leisure > Hobby > Food and Drink Enthusiasm
Score:
0.648
Code:
20000568
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000568
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Russell Vought
00:04:52-00:05:09 (16 sec)No Signal (0)
We will send up more if the President is, is, is on board with that as, as we see evidence of Congress passing them. This is the first step in it. Um, we're, I think it'll be on the floor next week, according to what, what the speaker told me, uh, uh, yesterday. And then, we'll, from there, we'll see where we are in the Senate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Russell Vought
00:05:09-00:05:14 (5 sec)No Signal (0)
But again, uh, we wanna see it pass. I think it will pass, and then we'll go from there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
3.8
Coleman-Liau Index
4
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Question
00:05:15-00:05:21 (5 sec)No Signal (0)
You, you said you would look at other ways. What are those other ways that you would seriously consider absent this moving forward?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.178
Leans Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Russell Vought
00:05:21-00:05:46 (25 sec)No Signal (0)
We have executive tools. We have the same, the, the very Empowerment Control Act itself gives us the ability to send up rescissions at the end of the fiscal year, and if Congress does not act on it, that funding expires. So, this has been used rare. Most people don't know about the process. We call it Pocket Rescissions, but again, it's one of the reasons why we are not putting all of our, our expectations in a typical rescissions process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.166
Leans Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Russell Vought
00:05:46-00:06:07 (21 sec)No Signal (0)
And just give you a sense, the President was the first person to dust off rescissions, uh, in his first term. We hadn't done it in 20 years. And, uh, we -- we literally, just because we wanted to get it, the process moving again, we, we selected what we call unobligated balance funds. And, and the House passed it, the Senate did not.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Russell Vought
00:06:07-00:06:28 (21 sec)No Signal (0)
And so, this precarious is hard work and we wanna make sure it's successful. And we don't wanna take, uh, our flexibility and our trade space off of the table that we have to be able to from an executive standpoint just not make the, just not spend the money, uh, using particular different options. We don't wanna lose any of our flexibility as a result of a failed vote in Congress.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.23077
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.23077
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.43532
VADER
0.772
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
1.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Question
00:06:30-00:06:35 (4 sec)No Signal (0)
-- together this particular round of rescissions in this first one you sent over to the Hill?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Russell Vought
00:06:35-00:06:43 (8 sec)No Signal (0)
We, we, we go through a process, and we figure out what's ready to go. We have our own strategic view of what we wanna send to the Hill, and the kinds of, uh, things that we wanna highlight.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.8
Coleman-Liau Index
5.8
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Question
00:06:43-00:06:56 (14 sec)No Signal (0)
Can you comment on the nature of this negotiation? I mean, in the old days, if the White House was having trouble getting a bill passed on, on Capitol Hill, they'd throw in a couple of bridges in a couple of districts and you'd use spending to get the bill over the line. Now, you know, the, the fight is about the spending itself, right?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.687
Very Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Question
00:06:56-00:07:01 (5 sec)No Signal (0)
So, you can't really do that. So, what do you offer these members if it's not spending in their districts?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Russell Vought
00:07:01-00:07:16 (14 sec)No StressLens
Well, I reject the premise that we're having a hard time getting the bill across Congress. I mean, the thing just passed the House. We've had about a week in between. Uh, it was a historically significant action by the House, and we're, uh, in the midst of very, very positive conversations with the Senate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.605
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Russell Vought
00:07:16-00:07:26 (10 sec)No Signal (0)
So I, I, I think we're in a good place. Uh, I think that, uh, the, the Senate conference is very united. Uh, and I think, you know, I'm looking forward to what they're able to produce.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.715
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.9
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
5.3
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
1.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Question
00:07:26-00:07:32 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
How much are you looking for in total savings from this in multiple packages that we can follow up?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.3
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.3
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Question
00:07:33-00:07:41 (9 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, with the various ah -- avenues we have with rescissions, like, how much money and, uh, have you made that case to Rand Paul or Ron Jones?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Russell Vought
00:07:41-00:08:03 (21 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, we'll be, you know, outlining our full picture, uh, in the days and weeks ahead. I mean, we have $160 billion that we put forward for fiscal year '26 as part of the budget that we sent up. Uh, that is, uh, you know, our look ahead to the next fiscal year about what these Doge cuts would look like. Uh, and then we're in the process always of looking back into the current fiscal year.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Russell Vought
00:08:03-00:08:15 (13 sec)No Signal (0)
We're, we're into it about what is still on, obligated, and what we can do, and that's a, a day by day thing. Uh, but we are certainly, uh, willing and, and able to send up additional packages as the Congressional will is there. Thanks guys.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.788
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.4
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
5.3
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1