Skip to content
RollCall logo
Fact
ba
.
se
Powered by FiscalNote StressLens
Joe Biden
Transcripts White House Calendar White House Press Releases

S. Hrg. 107-905 - Competition, Innovation, and Public Policy in the Digital Age: Is the Marketplace Working to...

Topics
Entities
Moderation
Speakers
Topics
No topics found
Entities
No entities found
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Full Transcript

Patrick Leahy

I appreciate you all being here. I just checked with Senator Hatch. He is delayed at another meeting and so we are beginning.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1295691589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0585563423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0181112846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0073452451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038293878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004581437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004259648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000414612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000161355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001085117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.20077E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Patrick Leahy

This is not a paid promotion for Amtrak, but Mr. Parsons is not here because he has been spending several hours trying to fly down from New York. Of course, he could have been here a couple of hours ago if he had taken the train on a foggy morning. That is just a personal thing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0182524222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0105517676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015675132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001030439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000383357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002857035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002758072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.00294E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.7157E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.1193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.061E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.4
Gunning-Fog Score
7.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Patrick Leahy

When I first arrived in the Senate, television broadcasts were no longer just in black and white. Record players had high fidelity and the excitement of stereophonic sound. The personal computer, e-mail, high-definition television, CDs, DVDs, wireless communications devices and the Internet were yet to be released and now they are among our most ubiquitous tools. We talk to our friends, we use in our work, we keep in touch with our families, we listen to music, we watch a movie, we play a video game, and all of it is almost like second nature.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.94444
VADER
0.829
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2907739719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0438934861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0315118581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0024560642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002351765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014948271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006338394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002450359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002236826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.04128E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.17441E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
88.041
Magnitude:
56
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Patrick Leahy

Each new tool has spawned new opportunities, entirely new industries, new ways to package and sell products, and new ways for consumers to enjoy copyrighted works. It is no surprise that the intellectual property generated in this country is an economic engine that is the envy of the world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0250213954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0227898767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0188174556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0065305518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0062723593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015164393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000513847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001489949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001282951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.28756E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2359E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.165
Magnitude:
95
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Patrick Leahy

I would note that in the New York Times this morning Amy Harmon has an excellent article which actually covers much of what we are talking about -- "Piracy or Innovation: Hollywood Versus High-Tech," with a picture of Stephen Jobs and Michael Eisner on it. I am going to put that in the record because it so well spells out and encapsulates some of the debate going on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0144699196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0087678156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040449893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014289088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012520093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010036294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006117263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004375593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.66655E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.49958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.0998E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
44.277
Magnitude:
49
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

There have been hearings recently in the Commerce Committee. I agreed with some of the things that the movie industry, Mr. Eisner and Mr. Valenti said, and I agreed with some of the things that the high-tech industry said. But I had significant disagreement with some of the things that Mr. Eisner and Mr. Valenti and some of the high-tech people said.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0186850608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0078036501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041945128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012476814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010616569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006805953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002071522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.8911E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.6561E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9933E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.093E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
33.776
Magnitude:
68
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
3.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Patrick Leahy

I mention this because it points up the differences of opinion in both the members of the Senate and within the various industries. As the article by Ms. Harmon points out, there are these differences. I say this because until the differences are resolved, certainly no legislation will pass this year. I hope everybody will understand that. Those who have to advise their clients, you can advise them without a lot more consensus. No legislation will pass this year.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.148
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.029757095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0196142631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0036358408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036135349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022780652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007926486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001926146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001406168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.76956E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.58434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.93025E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
90.97
Magnitude:
62
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

The entertainment industry certainly has not fully made their case, but the high-tech industry hasn't either. And if you have a case where the cases haven't been made definitively, then I don't think the Congress can act.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0056690064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038830109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019837775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014370576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010571308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009250699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000154808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001112101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.3826E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.5788E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7244E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
81.683
Magnitude:
79
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Patrick Leahy

The challenge of protecting music and motion pictures and sound recordings and computer software and other copyrighted works in digital formats has been the focus of the Judiciary Committee's sustained attention over the past few years. I have worked in close partnership with Senator Hatch and other members of this committee to keep our copyright laws up to date.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0150364387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047430407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0024492645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006259504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003111689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002060298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001684057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001674848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001292796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001141996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.79886E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
35.479
Magnitude:
37
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

We want to protect the rights of creators. We also want to ensure that consumers enjoy a vast selection of new and different educational, entertainment, and other copyrighted products. We also appreciate, having focused on these issues for so long, that new technological developments pose new challenges about how to protect copyright works and create new business models to deliver those products to customers securely, and so forth.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.97
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0091145062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0044247423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001672667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015864049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000723154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003658947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002832726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.67286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.68453E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7728E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1996E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
41.192
Magnitude:
59
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
31.858
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Patrick Leahy

New technologies often initially at least appear to trump intellectual property protection, but we have also found in the end they many, many times open new opportunities for artists, new choices for consumers, and often business models have to change accordingly. Protecting intellectual property, which has been within the jurisdiction of this committee since establishment in 1816, under another Vermonter as chairman, involves far more than arcane legal issues and requires a careful balance among the rights and interests of consumers, creators and innovators.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.939
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0100388192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0032620879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017226545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011404592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009542833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008219555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003632437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.45826E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.31673E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.17056E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7805E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
38.492
Magnitude:
68
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
26.22
Magnitude:
68
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
7.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Patrick Leahy

We were well aware of these new challenges in 1998 when Senator Hatch and I worked closely together on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the DMCA, to advance the goals of protecting digital copyrighted works and promoting the development of innovative technologies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0010491443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006307226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005543624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001895826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.37072E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.29021E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.41045E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3351E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.8047E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.776E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.8E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
41.013
Magnitude:
83
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
24.824
Magnitude:
83
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Patrick Leahy

At the time, this new law was praised by Jack Valenti, of the Motion Picture Association of America. Mr. Valenti is one of the most respected voices up here on Capitol Hill and he said that "offering intellectual property the full weaponry of the law to protect voyages in cyberspace from thieves who have previously determined that stealing creative works is very rewarding and very low risk."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.831
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0295626058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009364073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0027477143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0026402146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008478496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.84983E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.88591E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.51273E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.0354E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2658E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.204E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.932
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

A core provision of the DMCA barred the unauthorized circumvention of technological measures used effectively by content owners to prevent unauthorized access to copyrighted works. It left to the private sector the important decisions of what technological protection measures to develop and use to protect digital works or whether to use any protection measure at all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.751
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.008086185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002532806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006989485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000556315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000147603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001111848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.30324E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8229E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.3983E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.463E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.13E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
44.337
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

Technology has been the bane of content owners who are rightfully dismayed at the rampant online piracy of valuable works. I can't overemphasize how concerned all of us are here to think of people with copyrighted works that are stolen. But technology has also been pivotal to their protection. Since passage of the DMCA, great progress has been made to develop technical tools to protect and manage digital rights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.758
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.017620466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0093540868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033197732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010927291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010235625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008161667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.05997E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.90985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.7739E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7006E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.108E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
67.157
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Patrick Leahy

Multi-industry groups involving technology companies, consumer electronics companies, move studios and other content owners have developed technologies to protect digital content delivered to consumers on DVD and CD, over satellite, cable and broadband systems, and over the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0069150192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020322057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002607518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.14047E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
3.22053E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.8093E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.61422E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3172E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.009E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.99E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.995
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

Content owners are using these new digital rights management tools to develop and experiment with new business models for delivery of content to consumers. In the past few months, new sites like Pressplay and Musicnet have offered legitimate sources for Internet users and music lovers to access music online, protected by digital rights management technology that has been chosen and suits the needs of the owners. Today, we are going to see Mr. Taplin's Web site for consumers to enjoy video on demand, also protected by digital rights management tools that fit his business model and protect the movies from unauthorized copying.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0413633388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0129046864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029297144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004427686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001768982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001141847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.11855E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.7249E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.3129E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.701E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.46E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.16
Magnitude:
38
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37

Patrick Leahy

But it is not a perfect world, and three significant gaps in protection of digital works remain. First, movie and TV programming owners are concerned about the theft of their digital works distributed in unprotected over-the-air broadcast, the so-called "broadcast hole." This gap in protection has important policy implications, since the lack of copy protection for digital broadcasts poses the risk that high-quality, digital video content will only be available on cable or satellite, where digital rights management technology is available.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
-0.624
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0118720935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039663773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015720148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001239152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010135247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002416255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.8878E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.88584E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.09122E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7589E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.562E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
65.434
Magnitude:
102
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Patrick Leahy

Some content owners have warned that this could lead to a decline in high-quality content available on free over-the-air terrestrial broadcasts. The same multi-industry group that successfully developed the copy protection system used on the DVD is working on technical specifications for a "broadcast flag" that adds bits to broadcasts to prevent redistribution online.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0260181958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033078526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009715729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005885715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003523302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002343299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002073314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002024672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001351078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.65225E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.14813E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.115
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Patrick Leahy

Second, content owners are concerned about the audio-visual content delivered "in the clear" to the analog sets that are a staple in American households. They are concerned about them being converted into unprotected digital format and posted on the Internet for free downloading. The most promising technical solution for this so-called "analog hole" appears to be watermarking copy control technology, and there have been a lot of multi-industry meetings on that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.838
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0256942993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0140551521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040194263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028598719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010166971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005392762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003585112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001976856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001249494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.79048E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.1312E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.659
Magnitude:
54
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.2
Gunning-Fog Score
18.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32

Patrick Leahy

Finally, all content owners are concerned about peer-to- peer distribution services that allow the downloading of vast selections of valuable content for free. The hard reality is that unless the content is protected at the outset of the distribution chain, I am not aware of any easy technical solution to stop online piracy over these systems, other than tough enforcement of the laws.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.27297
VADER
0.906
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0021920896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009294205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005902454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002009221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001620104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.69349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.75184E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.02949E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.4154E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.2193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.525E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.09
Magnitude:
71
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Patrick Leahy

So despite the strides that have been made over the past few years to find technical solutions that protect digital works in a variety of distribution channels and forms, some are now telling the Congress that progress in finding technical solutions to the remaining gaps in protection are at an impasse. As a result, they are seeking congressional intervention to give the information technology companies a limited time to find solutions, or else turn the entire job of developing digital rights management systems over to a government agency. That strikes me as wrong-headed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.29412
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.29412
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.57054
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0434244721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032655553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026385607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015805335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004215892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001938916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001498283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.01626E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.18856E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.66172E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.42285E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
81.412
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Patrick Leahy

In an era when technology is changing so fast, to think that we are going to, by government fiat, determine what that is going to be, we will be back to the same kinds of things that slowed the development of good TV reception and a lot of other things.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0019785477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004364328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003512573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001825669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
7.33215E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.84337E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.00459E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2106E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.0111E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9944E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.044E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.409
Magnitude:
93
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Patrick Leahy

As I cautioned when the Hatch-Leahy distance education bill passed last summer, the copyright owners are a diverse group and some may want more flexibility. A government-mandated technical standard may produce a one-size-fits-all technology that may not suit the purposes of all content owners and may end up stifling innovative new technologies and implementations. Such a technology will not pass the U.S. Senate. There is no guarantee that the government agency will select the best technology to become the American standard, or in any shorter time period than the voluntary, industry-led process currently underway.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.871
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0216231085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0111555819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0029010809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014614385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011358949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008115216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004017903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003657119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002226054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.82603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.00682E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.899
Magnitude:
50
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Patrick Leahy

America's creators, innovators and consumers have and will continue to gain a great deal if the private sector works cooperatively to ensure that digital content can be distributed efficiently and securely. In my view, the private sector is best situated to guarantee that innovation, both technological innovation and creative innovation, continues without limitation or inhibition.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.76214
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.985
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0154679583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002883866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008658037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006942154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002649748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001038007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.24897E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.96392E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.05263E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.04575E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.19497E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.729
Magnitude:
95
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
3.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

I remember some of the communications systems that our Government has put together for everything from Air Force One on through, and great talk about the millions of dollars spent and good they were, and usually they were about one-quarter as good as what they could have bought off the shelf in any company in America.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.872
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0120743083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0116787189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.005899843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008924458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008169158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002928983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001586493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001387282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.37059E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.75347E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.44765E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
69.765
Magnitude:
55
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Patrick Leahy

Government regulators are simply not close enough to the marketplace to be in the best position to craft the kinds of standards that will protect the vital and vibrant asset that is given to consumers around the globe by America's entertainment and copyright industries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.949
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0296415121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0170121377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0097831115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013845662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007209112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000631263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004675078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001590744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.338E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.03047E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2507E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.814
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

So we will keep on working on this. Senator Hatch and I would ask that senior executives at media, information technology and consumer electronics companies get more involved in the discussions underway about digital rights management systems and make sure that the people participating in those talks meet on a regular basis. We urge you to make sure that they have the appropriate level of seniority, know-how and experience to keep the negotiations moving forward and not simply have negotiations for the sake of having negotiations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.008055431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0079205238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0053956777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002072069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019831003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001324521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001275321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.6344E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.3034E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.7786E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.494E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
94.78
Magnitude:
44
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30

Patrick Leahy

You may want to have monthly conference calls with your peers, whatever works best, but have people that can actually give an answer. I hope you will be in touch with each industry sector leader to make sure that we are doing something that is timely, consumer-friendly, technically feasible, and cost- effective. Ms. Rosen and Mr. Valenti and others have been briefing us about these discussions for years. I have taken part in some of them. I would hope you could send Senator Hatch and me regular updates on what you are doing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.956
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0592521334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0138530158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0068981317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001786668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0017313174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005448375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000442244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001900191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000130778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.117E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1466E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
78.799
Magnitude:
86
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Patrick Leahy

We have set up a new page on the committee Web site to post these progress reports. You see them over on that screen, and I would hope that people would use them. It is called "Protecting Creative Works in a Digital Age" and it can be found at www.judiciary.senate.gov. Senator Hatch and I have worked hard on this and we want your comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1028681174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0324697321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0207894991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0101852878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035572837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008878878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007258126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003096293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002282791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001831077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000160645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
29.779
Magnitude:
93
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.5
Gunning-Fog Score
5.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
8.1
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

For those are following this debate, we have also provided links to relevant legislation and committee hearings. We have an e-mail address where comments may be sent and we are going to post some of these comments. I am doing this to make this as available as possible, not just for those who are within this room, but whether they are sitting in Provo, Utah, or Bethel, Vermont, or anywhere else, they can do it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0371850416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0086410852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0013734339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001639144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001512265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.98146E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.58435E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.1382E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.937E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.13E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.117E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
60.505
Magnitude:
67
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Note

[Information on the committee Web site follows:]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0128428524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053692536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024265619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017293274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017004353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007521733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000612091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001648618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.14282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.14208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4186E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Note

[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0155122674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054561177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0045236371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019027468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009074381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003755101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.25007E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.95562E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.41879E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.0737E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.176E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Note

[The prepared statement of Senator Leahy follows:] Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy When I first arrived in the Senate television broadcasts were no longer just in black and white and record players had high-fidelity and stereophonic sound. The personal computer, email, high-definition television, CDs, DVDs, wireless communications devices and the Internet were yet to be created. Now these are among the ubiquitous tools we use today to do our work, talk to friends and family, listen to music, watch a movie, or play a video game. Each new tool has spawned new opportunities, entirely new industries, new ways to package and sell products, and new ways for consumers to enjoy copyrighted works. It is no surprise that the intellectual property generated in this country is an economic engine that is the envy of the world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.875
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.875
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.33537
VADER
0.904
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0111117348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0099118603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039563132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016407079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013056318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012859541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002388341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002072433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.5797E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.8436E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1267E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43

Patrick Leahy

Challenge of New Technologies. The challenge of protecting music, motion pictures, sound recordings, computer software and other copyrighted works in digital formats has been the focus of the Judiciary Committee's sustained attention over the past few Congresses. I have worked in partnership with Senator Hatch, and other Members of this Committee, to keep our copyright laws up to date to protect the rights of creators and ensure that consumers enjoy a vast selection of new and different educational, entertainment and other copyrighted products.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.896
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0024690531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018701672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013372081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007378439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002710583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001233521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001007056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.21715E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.3464E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.281E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
81.761
Magnitude:
128
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Patrick Leahy

We appreciate, having focused on these issues for so long, that new technological developments pose new challenges about how to protect copyrighted works and create new business models to deliver those products to consumers securely, cost-effectively, and conveniently. New technologies may initially appear to trump intellectual property protection, but in the end they open new opportunities for artists and new choices for consumers. Protecting intellectual property, which has been within the jurisdiction of this Committee since its establishment in 1816, involves far more than arcane legal issues and requires a careful balance among the rights and interests of consumers, creators, and innovators.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.66501
VADER
0.966
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.026115845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0115315728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042457228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013267982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010130976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004008878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001968492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.24775E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.3608E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.71889E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3913E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
38.406
Magnitude:
83
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
33.073
Magnitude:
83
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
11.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
42
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41

Patrick Leahy

DMCA. We were well aware of these new challenges in 1998, when I worked closely with Senator Hatch on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, "DMCA," to advance the complementary goals of protecting digital copyrighted works and promoting the development of innovative technologies. At the time, this new law was praised by Jack Valenti of the Motion Picture Association of America as "offering intellectual property the full weaponry of the law to protect its voyages in cyberspace from thieves who have previously determined that stealing creative works is very rewarding and very low risk." (Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, September 10, 1998). A core provision of the DMCA barred the unauthorized circumvention of "technological measures" used effectively by content owners to prevent unauthorized access to copyrighted works. The new law left to the private sector the important decisions of what technological protection measures to develop and use to protect digital works -- or whether to use any protection measure at all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.16667
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.16667
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.31015
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.77307
VADER
0.956
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0110702655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034667664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015491318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013458451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001033897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000432229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001703923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.24981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.19796E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.03355E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.154E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
40.803
Magnitude:
101
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
23.269
Magnitude:
101
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
64
Sprache Difficult Word Count
64

Patrick Leahy

DRM Progress. Technology has been the bane of content owners, who are rightfully dismayed at the rampant online piracy of valuable works, but it is also pivotal to their protection. Since passage of the DMCA, great progress has been made to develop diverse technical tools to protect and manage digital rights in various media. Multi-industry groups, involving technology companies, consumer electronics companies, movie studios and other content owners, have developed technologies to protect digital content delivered to consumers on DVD and CD, over satellite, cable and broadband systems, and over the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.5506
VADER
0.959
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0214216125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012893335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001248173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009870403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002470504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002071816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002027998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.7706E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.71016E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.25526E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.256E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.516
Magnitude:
159
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
40

Patrick Leahy

Content owners are using these new digital rights management tools to develop and experiment with new business models for delivery of content to consumers. Just in the past few months, new sites like Pressplay and Musicnet have offered legitimate sources for Internet users and music lovers to access music online -- all protected by digital rights management technology that has been chosen and suits the needs of the owners. We will also see today Jonathan Taplin's Web site for consumers to enjoy video-on-demand, also protected by digital rights management tools that fit his business model and protect the movies from unauthorized copying.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.958
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0141766301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0056963188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016881248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013526453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001290336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009935766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002296298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001378608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.50852E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.474E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.7691E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.805
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Patrick Leahy

DRM Gaps. This is not a perfect world, however, and three significant gaps in protection of digital works indisputably remain. First, movie and TV programming owners are concerned about the theft of their digital works distributed in unprotected over-the-air broadcasts -- the so-called "broadcast hole." This gap in protection has important policy implications since the lack of copy protection for digital broadcasts poses the risk that high-quality, digital video content will only be available on cable or satellite, where digital rights management technology is available. Some content owners have warned that this could lead to a decline in high-quality content available on free over-the-air terrestrial broadcasts. The same multi- industry group that successfully developed the copy protection system used on the DVD, is working on technical specifications for a "broadcast flag" that adds bits to broadcasts to prevent redistribution online.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.53846
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.53846
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.51724
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.51724
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.105
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0624056265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0481936324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.046284683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0150320528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.008759433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00022468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001737225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.91742E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.31264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.73834E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2651E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
71.708
Magnitude:
102
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
56
Sprache Difficult Word Count
49

Patrick Leahy

Second, content owners are concerned about the audio-visual content delivered "in the clear" to the analog TC sets that are a staple in American households being converted into unprotected digital format and posted on the Internet for free downloading. The most promising technical solution for this so-called "analog hole" appears to be watermarking copy control technology -- and this solution is also the subject of multi-industry meetings.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.838
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0054254535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002524099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019438823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006679511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005922483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001246337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.54504E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.53302E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.05748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.9573E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.421E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.552
Magnitude:
140
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
14.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Patrick Leahy

Finally, all content owners are concerned about peer-to-peer distribution services that facilitate the downloading of vast selections of valuable content for fee. The hard reality is that unless the content is protected at the outset of the distribution chain, there is no easy technical solution to stop online piracy over these systems, other than tough enforcement.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0112492206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047898582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012811325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011717494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009145107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003823723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000204011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.13555E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.22831E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4384E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1371E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.213
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Patrick Leahy

Problems with Legislated Mandates. Despite the great strides that have been made over the last few years to find technical solutions to protect digital works in a variety of distribution channels and forms, some are now telling the Congress that progress on finding technical solutions to the remaining gaps in protection are at an "impasse." (Testimony of Peter Chernin, at hearing before Senate Commerce Committee, February 28, 2002, at p. 91; testimony of Michael Eisner, id., at p. 92). As a result, they are seeking congressional intervention to give the information technology companies a limited time to find solutions or else turn the entire job of developing digital rights management systems over to a government agency. This strikes me as wrong-headed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.26316
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.26316
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.126
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0287756906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0081932601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025140955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017813309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014942854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014658506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005523897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003481989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001413703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.05952E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6796E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.815
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
48
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44

Patrick Leahy

As I cautioned when the Hatch-Leahy distance education bill, the TEACH Act, S. 487, passed the Senate last summer, "copyright owners are a diverse group, and some owners may want more flexibility and variety in the technical protection measures available for their works than would result if the government intervened too soon and mandated a particular standard or system." (Congressional Record, June 7, 2001, S. 5990). A government-mandated technical standard may produce a one- size-fits-all technology that may not suit the purposes of all content owner and end up stifling innovative new technologies and implementations. There is no guarantee that the government agency will select the best technology to become the American standard or in any shorter time period than the voluntary, industry-led process currently underway, to the long-term disadvantage of both content owners and technology companies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73913
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73913
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.76766
VADER
0.794
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0111569541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002889672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0022125352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015089551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000792187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006014755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002413102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001752489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.09316E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.55087E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7792E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.228
Magnitude:
117
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
48

Patrick Leahy

Marketplace Solutions. America's creators, innovators and consumers have and will continue to gain a great deal if the private sector works cooperatively to ensure that digital content can be distributed efficiently and securely. Deployment of effective anti-piracy tools to fill the remaining gaps in coverage is critically important because the absence of such tools may affect the development of new product offerings -- whether for broadband or consumer products.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.963
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0075756594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0073307951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0045227396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024202689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009317093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003247147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001386639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.07491E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.66718E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.5415E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.139
Magnitude:
133
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Patrick Leahy

In my view, the private sector is best situated to guarantee that innovation -- both technological innovation and creative innovation -- continues without limitation or inhibition. Government regulators are simply not close enough to the marketplace to be in the best position to craft the kinds of robust standards that will protect the vital and vibrant asset that is given to consumers around the globe by America's entertainment and copyright industries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.95551
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.988
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0068059227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034597182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034140885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015074364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013850575
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006174779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002384484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001021739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.75331E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.10321E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.3237E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.728
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
12.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Patrick Leahy

Monitoring of Progress by Committee. These are important issues, and this Committee will remain fully engaged, as we have in the past, in protecting the rights and interests of content owners and consumers, while fostering technical innovation. To assist us in that effort, Senator Hatch and I would ask the senior executives at media, information technology, and consumer electronics companies to get more involved in the discussions underway about digital rights management systems, and make sure that the people participating in those talks meet on a regular and frequent basis. We urge you to make sure that they have the appropriate level of seniority, know how and experience to keep the negotiations moving forward in a productive, timely manner. For example, you may want to have a monthly conference call with your peers where you talk about the progress of the various working groups -- and help break through the inevitable roadblocks. We hope that you will also be in touch with each industry sector leader to make sure that solutions are not only consensus-based, technically feasible and cost effective, but also timely and consumer friendly. Jack Valenti, Hilary Rosen and others have been briefing us about these discussions for years. We would ask that leaders from the content and information technology companies send us regular updates every two months to keep us posted on the state of the negotiations for finding solutions to the remaining gaps in protection for digital content, and how the interests of consumers are being addressed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.31015
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.78723
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.78723
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.04476
VADER
0.971
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0064694468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053571785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001159085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006043118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004574586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001333135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.32112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.57018E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.48049E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.31053E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.971E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
27.952
Magnitude:
71
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
26.366
Magnitude:
71
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
86
Sprache Difficult Word Count
80

Patrick Leahy

These progress reports are important not just for this Committee but for many stakeholders, including Internet users and consumers of digital content. The Committee has set up a new page on the Committee Web site to post these progress reports. The page is called "Protecting Creative Works In A Digital Age: What Is At Stake For Content Creators, Purveyors and Users?" It can be found at [www.judiciary.senate.gov]. For those who are following this important debate, we have also provided links to relevant legislation and Committee hearings. We hope to hear from many stakeholders, consumers and Internet users on this issue and, particularly, as progress reports are made and posted. We will have an email address where comments may be sent and portions of those comments will be posted for perusal on the site.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.03688
VADER
0.957
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0112886461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0096779273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039136663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005912719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005805834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005135413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002132864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.25243E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.61358E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.9626E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.314E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.292
Magnitude:
251
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38

Patrick Leahy

We appreciate that complicated problems do not lend themselves to quick and easy solutions, and we stand ready to help move these private sector discussions to a timely conclusion. We know that legislation may be necessary to implement some of the intra-industry agreements that are reached and we want to be in a position to move promptly and thoughtfully when the time is ripe.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.923
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0151528657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0109499706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040566054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008268149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008170599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001941646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.50855E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.80509E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.0495E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.255E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.189E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.074
Magnitude:
132
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Patrick Leahy

I turn to Senator Hatch and ask him for his comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0659417594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.062143727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0534424616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0226188829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0079657439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021125452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009470414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002550983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002132787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.50164E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.22246E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
33.764
Magnitude:
64
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
29.598
Magnitude:
64
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
20.674
Magnitude:
64
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88
Gunning-Fog Score
4.4
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

STATEMENT OF HON. ORRIN G. HATCH, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF UTAH Senator Hatch. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman. We have long worked together on legislation dealing with copyright and other intellectual property laws. We have all worked hard to balance the interests, and done so in a bipartisan fashion. You have cited the landmark Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which clarified the application of copyright law to the digital world in a way that fostered the growth of technology and which sets the floor upon which today's discussion really builds.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.886
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0048727266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030753974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004608145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003561218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001614703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.55551E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.78108E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.86602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.13152E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7682E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9812E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Patrick Leahy

Our intellectual property laws govern property rights that inhere in the creative work we enjoy over the Internet, over the television, radio, cable and satellite systems. Copyright and other intellectual property laws give creators the incentive and protection they need to make their movies and music and stories and artworks available to us.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.935
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0307741022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0267233525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033738321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008185964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006325146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004547735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004400735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000193493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.46949E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.77364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.4073E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.329
Magnitude:
93
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

In making intellectual property policy, technology continues to challenge us, but we have attempted to meet those challenges. In passing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act just three years ago, we sought to ensure that copyright owners would make their works available on the Internet by clearly applying the protection of copyright law to the digital world in a way that also allowed technology to grow and develop.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.866
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0199077185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0096894881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0064743719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0048300113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028603572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002250109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003549459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.54405E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.36518E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.03187E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.7136E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
45.908
Magnitude:
53
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

Our committee also worked with the Commerce Committee to take advantage of new technology to make local television signals available over satellite in the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act -- an advantage I hope will not be undermined by anticompetitive mergers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.853
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1108758152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1082710107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.006001805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050420975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021600034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017976608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008729762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.46293E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.11419E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.41394E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.24208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
64.115
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
3.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

This hearing today discusses issues related specifically to additional technological protections for copyrighted content transmitted over digital networks and the Government's role. There are precedents for legislation in this area. Specifically, the Audio Home Recording Act required all home audio recording device makers to conform to the Serial Copy Management System, which allowed unlimited first-generation copying of music but stopped second-generation copying. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act included a provision adopting the so-called Macrovision standard for copy protection of analog videotapes in all video cassette recorders, while ensuring that certain programming continues to be freely available for copying by television viewers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.49651
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3606293816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1454943209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0900416984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0194875931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0160882031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033032691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009089971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008386587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003467054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000214989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000126989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.583
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
58
Sprache Difficult Word Count
52

Patrick Leahy

The lesson, I think, is we have been here before and we have met the challenge when technology has thrown down the gauntlet. I think it is your preference, however, as well as mine, that the market work these issues out, if it can. On the other hand, when it cannot, Congress can facilitate a resolution that ultimately benefits consumers and creators, the studios, and technology companies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9715962708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7084237188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4051150531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9449509904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9106568992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6560509559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2244787524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1440920285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.129386934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0909486145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0488112506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
59.938
Magnitude:
101
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

With respect to market resolution of the specific issues at hand, there seems to be something approaching consensus on the technology and use of the so-called "flag" in digital broadcasts that can allow digital home recording of broadcast programming, but will stop further redistribution of those recorded programs outside the home network to the general public via the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.05427695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0072857183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0057057565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047675552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036828638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012747926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004039514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001226918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.26684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.36483E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.2617E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
53.113
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

Plugging the "analog hole," as it is commonly referred to, is more problematic, but likely solvable. This is the problem that occurs when a digital file is converted to an analog signal for viewing or listening and loses any digital instructions that may have been included in the original digital packet. Finally, there is almost no consensus on a technical or policy front with regard to Internet file-sharing or general Internet distribution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
-0.793
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.307899178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1134317601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0994221657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0232300445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004388854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043270444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010199165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010042671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001690703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001451462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.43274E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.1
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Patrick Leahy

While philosophically we agree that the market, with its business and technical expertise, ought to try to solve these issues, I think there is a useful role for Congress, too, in reaching or implementing creator- and consumer-friendly agreements in at least three ways.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0507223012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0178366507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0107868684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035262809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018895482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011906592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010260725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006803643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004841213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002309213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.88853E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.37
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

First, we can help set deadlines and push for agreement where there may be deadlocks that ultimately hurt both artists and consumers. Second, we can help set balanced objectives and priorities. And, third, we can codify consensus policies or minimum standards.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0655859767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0511321006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0079545469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0054231979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037809517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021828857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013610613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005011517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002243057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001391356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.799E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
97.149
Magnitude:
43
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

The growth of broadband opportunities for many of our constituents is stalled, and it may be helpful for Congress to encourage all parties to get agreement when it is best for the markets, consumers and artists. I also believe it is necessary for Congress to help ensure that consumer expectations will be more fully respected than they might otherwise be in private agreement.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.985
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0219411726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054897231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0041826253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0036638703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018538094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018276001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.001001396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008585402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005593538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001784295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.74428E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
60.264
Magnitude:
41
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Patrick Leahy

For example, I would like to be certain that as new controls are placed on digital content that consumers are allowed to make legitimate personal copies, as they have done before, and use those copies as they have been accustomed to doing. Music fans want to take their music with them in the car, on the beach, to a party. Movie and sports fans want to watch on their big screens, not just on their computer monitors.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0354031275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.008248489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0057466073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0052720101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038326027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028306544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006274032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002949487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001893752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.59653E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.9377E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.196
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

Now, let me state clearly as we discuss consumer rights and expectations that we all should not forget that consumers will have nothing to enjoy if there was not the incentive for artists and creators to develop entertainment content and share it with us.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.708
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0364508567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074823394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047002388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028265571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027501967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002109329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000117496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001016094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.8825E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.93074E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2931E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.203
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Patrick Leahy

Moreover, as the HDTV market has demonstrated, without digital content there will not be sales of digital electronic devices. As with many things, this is a balancing act, but if there is one thing Congress does regularly, it is balance interests, sometimes not very well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.227
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0061349856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045376357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009395013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000353153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003530294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.92451E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.68256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.393E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.187E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.94E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.13E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
46.796
Magnitude:
44
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
31.967
Magnitude:
44
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Patrick Leahy

Consumers want rich content. To get the creators of that rich content to share it in emerging interactive digital systems, they must be assured that destructive misuse will not undermine their businesses. On the other hand, consumers also want to use and enjoy that content with the advanced ease, superior quality, and enhanced enjoyment that the new digital systems will allow.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.1431
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
0.979
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.084528845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0438215939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033212484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009857337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003800912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003132797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000242144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.22935E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.28778E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.09227E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.9728E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.367
Magnitude:
45
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Patrick Leahy

In another context, Mr. Chairman, I have said that if the media and technology companies will focus on the people at the two ends of their networks -- the artists and the audience -- they can benefit for everybody from end to end. We can learn from the lessons of the Napster case. This has been a cautionary tale to those who would leave the issues to the law of the jungle and protracted litigation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.009405383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004661355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00382607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012635919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007207827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001598227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001426379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.76399E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.64422E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.30364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2226E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.712
Magnitude:
61
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

I should also say that you certainly don't want litigation right now with our courts literally half empty in certain circuits. I just couldn't resist.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.43
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0484871503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0177823618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048272577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041071075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036225232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008714299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003718605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003676022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002957396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001172307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.03001E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.424
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Patrick Leahy

I agree with you. I wish you had allowed some of those nominees to go through during the six years you were chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1767585753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0620628416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0313107943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025405881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025262518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001704273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004745399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002492503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001917046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.66693E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.18753E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
90.078
Magnitude:
25
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Orrin Hatch

We never had a situation as bad as it is now.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1782970969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0703831203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0109497312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.009026222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.004552463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024938912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007434301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004865991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003093362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002089462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002087188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
2.4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Orrin Hatch

I should also say you certainly don't want litigation right now. This is something I would like to see us avoid. But I sincerely hope the ongoing music industry conflicts will not be replicated in the video context, which has been avoided to some degree by the slow rollout of broadband.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.592
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2442169003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0544913695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0232605176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0089028617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033603294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027042701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0025824862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003126139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001250412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001223342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.33476E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
31.196
Magnitude:
11
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
28.145
Magnitude:
11
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Orrin Hatch

However the issues of the Napster case are resolved -- I have been calling for years for a market-based, fair resolution to those issues -- that case may suggest that some involvement by Congress is necessary to ensure that technology and intellectual property work together for consumers and creators.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.836
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0030796062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013770944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004287579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003301951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.30462E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.98261E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.95081E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.5574E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.11306E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9377E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.17E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
67.814
Magnitude:
51
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Orrin Hatch

Finally, we must remember that the Internet is international. As ranking member of the International Trade Subcommittee of the Finance Committee, I know too well that intellectual property is our number one export, and we need to do all we can to ensure that our trading position remains strong and that our trading partners work with us in using digital networks as avenues for legitimate trade. We must continue to ensure that foreign countries will provide adequate and effective protection and that their laws are not eroded as they face new challenges posed by new technologies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0744411547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0525352196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0214302141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.011742628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025421807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021841954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006806661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.68581E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.10615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.27504E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7061E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
33.818
Magnitude:
49
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
33.691
Magnitude:
49
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32

Orrin Hatch

In conclusion, I also want to reemphasize my and Chairman Leahy's interest, and others on this committee, in call for ongoing informational updates from the negotiating parties and for input from everyone who has an interest in these issues via our Web site. I want to encourage the parties -- the content community and the information technology community -- to continue and redouble your efforts to find common ground. These are complex issues and with the right resources I am confident that you can resolve all of these problems.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.95551
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.88707
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0703828875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0192862164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0128844971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032038071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022829348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012910227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009526766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001968558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001740922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000138494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.26287E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Foreign Trade
Score:
79.577
Magnitude:
96
Code:
18
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#18
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Orrin Hatch

I think it would be helpful for us to get a variety of views and regular updates on the ongoing private discussions. I should say that if this drags on to the point where it hurts intellectual property, creators and consumers, then I think we here on the committee will introduce balanced legislation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1197247067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0275505445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0117266922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004285678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0038273323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035184239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005182057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000311293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002458981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001012759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.76353E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Orrin Hatch

So, Mr. Chairman, I look forward to the testimony today and I want to thank all of those who are testifying.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.422
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2261061454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1934717642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0677217438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0291753386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0213130261
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041362131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0028668814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0011929458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008439195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008315254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002564171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
47.698
Magnitude:
53
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Patrick Leahy

Thank you very much.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2202557633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0250763027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0131249515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.010373089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0088761852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016415484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0006918282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000365434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002534571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001526662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.21442E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

Our first witness will be Craig Barrett. He is Intel's chief executive officer. Mr. Barrett had a very distinguished career as a teacher, an author and academic. I understand, Mr. Barrett, that you are the author of a college textbook on materials science that is used today throughout the country. So we feel very fortunate to have you here, and please go ahead. Your whole statement, of course, will be made part of the record, but go ahead and hit us with the points you want us to remember.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.491
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0342485204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0184464167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0134777467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016227319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014881008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008124531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005161234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000310768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.61485E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.15422E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.86673E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Craig Barrett

Certainly, Senator. If I had a digital recorder here today and I could have recorded yours and Senator Hatch's comments and then obtained your copyright license to play it back into the record, that would suffice to give my present position.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0152668581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012506966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0008137543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001995873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001747932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001695811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001201016
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.20388E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.21281E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43086E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.182E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Craig Barrett

I really have four points I want to make. First of all, the high-tech or information technology industry does care about intellectual property and copyrighted content. It is the basis of our industry, it is the lifeblood of our industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1240531332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.073146919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0520177011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063420746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037540631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0033348162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023345567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007413132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002658485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002635383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.6796E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
47.025
Magnitude:
40
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.419
Magnitude:
40
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Craig Barrett

Second, the industries -- the IT industry, consumer electronics industry and the content industry -- are working together in a voluntary, consensus fashion to create technological solutions to copyright protection. I think that that process can continue effectively without broad Government mandates and will be the most effective way to move the technology forward and to protect content.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.55535
VADER
0.893
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0156507522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0130919274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0102910686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0068191366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005602164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004154099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003544358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
4.84975E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.84287E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.1177E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.04295E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.604
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Craig Barrett

Third, I think you will continually hear that the basis for content protection is really protection at the source. Once content is delivered in a free, streaming digital format into the Internet, it is very difficult to recall it or protect it, and I will make a few comments about that later on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.483
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0025865234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017360526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004520252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004094367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001926435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.76003E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.37001E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.00425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.73512E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.409E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.831E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.59
Magnitude:
53
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Craig Barrett

Fourth, I completely agree with both of your comments that, in fact, this is a complicated issue where we have to worry about protecting intellectual property as well as protecting the rights and expectations of consumers as we move from an analog to a digital world. So there has to be some balance between content protection, copyright protection and consumer expectations, where we have educated consumers in the analog world as to what to expect. And now we move into a digital world and they probably carry the same expectations with them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.644
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0759269984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0256298517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.018593017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021648661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011073645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010402792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003226764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001909759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.54067E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.15282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.8185E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
81.038
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Craig Barrett

Just a very few expansive comments on those four points. First, the high-tech industry probably loses four times the dollar content that the content industry or the movie industry and the music industry loses on an annual basis to piracy. The estimates are $11 to $12 billion a year for the high-tech industry, primarily in software licenses which are pirated. That compares to about $3 or $3.5 billion for the content community. I think that gives a relative measure of how important it is to our industry to protect intellectual property.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.5506
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0513731211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009379087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0070793496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0068422669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045641045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001181265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010724517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002214123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.28175E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.8393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.7671E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
51.747
Magnitude:
87
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Craig Barrett

Second, the IT industry has devoted an extensive amount of time, hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds of man-years of effort, working with the consumer electronics industry and the content industry to promote technical solutions to copyright protection.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1485783141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070118469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0060851969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0041153449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003071798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010894607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001700266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.03423E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.44081E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.7502E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.599E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.981
Magnitude:
38
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Craig Barrett

I have in front of me, if you would care to look at them, about three or four inches of technical specifications which are in the industry. These cover DVD audio, recordable media, and protecting content over home networks. You can go into any consumer electronics store such as Circuit City today and buy either content or equipment which conforms to these specifications. So over the last six years, we have been doing much more than just talking about the issue. Technical solutions are in the marketplace today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0439531519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0306791306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0169841456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0038291397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025875966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010123444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005170677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.66529E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.64602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.14817E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.8994E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.122
Magnitude:
88
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Craig Barrett

The basis for these technical specifications are really protection of content at the source, and then simply not passing content on to equipment or facilities that do not respect the rights of the content owners. So if the equipment doesn't honor the rules, then the content doesn't move.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
-0.309
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0446203456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0103314698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0071362716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037201284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015666434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003164856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001655394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.62112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.86455E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.457E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3893E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.215
Magnitude:
48
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Craig Barrett

In the six years that the copy protection working group, comprised of the IT, consumer electronics and content industries, has been working, we have addressed many issues. As you pointed out accurately in your opening statement, we are working on terrestrial high-definition TV broadcasting and a probable solution there, including a flag to monitor that content and to protect that content. On solving the analog hole, we expect to have solutions proposed and tested within the next few months. And perhaps the biggest issue is the one you mentioned, which is the peer-to-peer issue of moving unprotected content from computer to computer. I will make a few comments about that later on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0136884846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0110863759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0108166569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003177227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020930594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006648301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005671088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003728189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.23603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.31462E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5919E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.319
Magnitude:
112
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Craig Barrett

This morning, I am pleased to be seated next to Mr. Parsons' chair, and hopefully he will show up in a few minutes. Being seated next to Dick is important from the standpoint that AOL Time Warner and Intel have worked very closely together in terms of technological protection of content over the years.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0350998831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0296564103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0124152051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036958078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016924803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011830293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009361215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001153094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.96224E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5134E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.732E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.739
Magnitude:
54
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
8.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Craig Barrett

We firmly believe that copyright technical solutions are forthcoming from the technical working group. We firmly believe that in some instances there very well need be narrow, mandated Government involvement here, such as the ability to encrypt or put a flag in digital TV signals. But primarily we believe the consensual process among our industries is working, as evidenced by the technology we have already put in the marketplace.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.656
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0803962583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0526281423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0279967702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0103706465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0066902619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047067064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042075368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026704289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001349297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002269729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.03219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.136
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Craig Barrett

I would like to make a few comments about the peer-to-peer piracy issue. Again, the core issue here is protecting content at the source. It is very difficult to protect unencrypted content once it is just a digital stream on the Internet, and completely stopping the piracy of unprotected content is very, very difficult for the mere reason that it is impossible to determine the difference between lawful content -- home movies, home audio -- on the Internet and copyrighted content on the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.94444
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
-0.583
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0883971865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0230994498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0066753368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0059619029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011608925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004027528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003432765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001608397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.57684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.49782E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.20023E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.769
Magnitude:
84
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Craig Barrett

There is no solution to this problem today, although the industry is working toward possible solutions. I believe there is no silver bullet here. It will be a combination probably of legal solutions, business solutions, technology solutions and legislative solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0634585565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0602411572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0560499437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035929486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0007308671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000524925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004812053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003885127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.63836E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.22851E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.7394E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
94.337
Magnitude:
40
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Craig Barrett

There have been suggestions made that digital devices could continuously monitor content streaming on the Internet and only respond or only play protected copyrighted content back, authorized content. I think this solution is a bit simplistic. As I mentioned, there is no way to tell the difference between unprotected copyrighted content and legal home content once it is nothing more than a stream of ones and zeroes on the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.27297
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.01285709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0121638819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0115223615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024613821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000374353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002240107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.87426E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.68452E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.69256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.0006E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.786E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.468
Magnitude:
70
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

If people think their computers crash now --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0214176922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012759907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012322828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009797423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002474255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002057394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002051743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.74009E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.74739E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.24975E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.214E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
57.122
Magnitude:
8
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Note

[Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9715962708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7084237188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4051150531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9449509904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9106568992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6560509559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2244787524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1440920285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.129386934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0909486145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0488112506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Craig Barrett

Let alone that, but the mere prospect of trying to monitor all the content that flies on the Internet, I think, carries with it some severe limitations. There is a technical limitation. This would mean you would have to have in digital format all the copyrighted content in the world. You would then have to compare the streaming information on the Internet to that database of copyrighted content, and once you found a match do something with it. I am not sure what you would do once you found it. You could deny service.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.821
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0141031065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034556593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034146451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003387453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021475013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010283069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.6038E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.10989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.3576E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.6774E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.11E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.665
Magnitude:
94
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

I think you go back to what you said earlier that if you can't protect content at the source, then --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
-0.12
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.007161816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031010844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002108554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011334202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006735322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.075E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.10262E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.0791E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9179E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3493E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.709E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
36.452
Magnitude:
21
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Craig Barrett

It is a tough issue if you don't protect it at the source.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.243
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2853433602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1848400454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0465707562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0396601652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033792254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017122475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013473001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.78004E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.93803E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.5016E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6224E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
72.763
Magnitude:
13
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
96
Gunning-Fog Score
5.2
Coleman-Liau Index
4.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

I might want to come back to that more. I just want to make sure we give everybody a chance to testify while all members are here, and I am going to come back to the points you were making and I do want to go to Mr. Taplin.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.668
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1111809048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0265335024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0122493278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.010634496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0058364963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0044075434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016059099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009840909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008949207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001244952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.51543E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
38.626
Magnitude:
49
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
36.13
Magnitude:
49
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
90.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
3.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Craig Barrett

Certainly.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0389709894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0283420115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0249597069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0206692101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0100044454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023076253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001902059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007726585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002997307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.09174E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.68141E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Barrett follows:] Statement of Craig R. Barrett, Chief Executive Officer, Intel Corporation I appreciate the opportunity to discuss the IT industry's work to create effective tools to protect copyrighted digital content. In sum, my message is this: we care about piracy, we are providing solutions to solvable problems, and those solutions come best through a voluntary, consensual process -- not regulatory mandates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.82455
VADER
0.945
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0427028921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0166389989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0133893089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0076409196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016696451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00046217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003358485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002303859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002148701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.44615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8173E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.167
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Craig Barrett

IT is working to protect content and reduce piracy Some in the content community have suggested that the IT industry does not care about reducing piracy of copyrighted works, that we actually promote piracy to grow our industry. Nothing could be further from the truth. We place the highest value on protecting intellectual property, and have worked in countless forums over decades to support and defend IP rights. We know that without adequate protection, content owners will not make their content available over digital networks. Piracy for the high-tech industry means losses of about 12 billion dollars a year; for the content owners, it is about 3.5 billion a year. It is a plague for all of us. That is why our industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars of our own money, and has devoted the time of hundreds of engineers, to developing solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.55556
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.55556
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.06142
VADER
0.929
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0100180012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0072425144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021800106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017584756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001408865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007914289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005454281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.64175E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2502E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.53E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6514E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
61.496
Magnitude:
144
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41

Craig Barrett

Good progress has been made This work -- carried out in close cooperation with Hollywood studios and consumer electronics companies -- has now extended over six years. It has resulted in new technologies for the protection of content made available through DVD'S, pre-recorded audio media, and "secure network" systems such as cable and satellite. We are moving forward with specifications for protecting over-the-air digital television broadcasts, which we expect to be finalized around the end of this month. These new tools, when used properly, protect content "at the source" -- when it is created -- and prevent piracy in any environment, including the Internet. Content is simply not passed on to devices that don't honor the rules. These technologies are available and in use today to protect content delivered to home networks.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.66356
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0354485179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0147490544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.012218437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002637577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006419203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001756635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001360657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.24935E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.38226E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.17062E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3538E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.916
Magnitude:
132
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
46
Sprache Difficult Word Count
47

Craig Barrett

In addition, we are now jointly studying watermark technologies that may help with the so-called "analog hole", which can be generally understood as analog outputs on consumer electronic devices. Content ported through these outputs could be reconverted to unprotected digital format. Watermarks may provide a means to ensure that protection rules survive as content transitions to analog, outputs.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.422
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3428338096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0733951514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0492310734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0160655312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0082239923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046891262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0034844124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004231432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000313321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.72313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.388E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.794
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Craig Barrett

I want to emphasize that, during these six years of work, there has not been a single protection issue put forward by the content community that we have not responded to with solutions. And those solutions are successful: many of our partners in this work -- such as AOL-Time/Warner, who I am pleased to appear with today -- are moving forward to take advantage of these new protection technologies to bring protected digital products to market.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.923
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0404924416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0391801208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0381030637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050899827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0040589504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023427419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000610606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003880039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001165713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.67642E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.51738E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.672
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Craig Barrett

AOL-Time/Warner and Intel are in agreement that where there are identifiable, effective solutions to specific problems that would require limited government action to implement -- as in the case of digital television broadcasting -- then limited directives have a useful and productive role to play. As Dick has stated, we are developing a joint statement of principles on these points. But consensus here is the key.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.542
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0622171268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0574510894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.015305134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.01415109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051509265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030970117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010152128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010052444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000214916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001739627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.07394E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.995
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Craig Barrett

Peer to peer: IT cannot police the Internet As I have said, the solutions we have developed thus far work when the content is protected from the source. However, when we look at the explosive growth of peer-to-peer networks, combined with the ready availability of unprotected content, we are faced with a wholly different problem. Completely stopping the piracy of unprotected content -- whether it consists of older creative works that have already been uploaded to computers, movies recorded off a theater screen with a camcorder, or copies of new films stolen from studios by employees -- is beyond the reach of what known technologies can do. No single solution -- technical, legal, legislative, or business -- exists to fully address this form of piracy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.93827
VADER
0.137
Leans Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0157089264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0087732267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0068534791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0055877408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027190979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0020118103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005098706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002210475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.89643E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.09816E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5088E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.29
Magnitude:
125
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
50

Craig Barrett

Some content providers suggest that all digital devices could continuously examine all data downloaded from the Internet and analyze it to sort out copyrighted from uncopyrighted material. We don't think this would work. First, once unprotected content is digitized, absent a watermark that can carry embedded usage rules (which must be attached to the source file), your home movies look no different to a computer than a Hollywood film would. Thus, this approach would require either forbidding access to unprotected content by the PC -- including home movies -- unless you submit your home movies for review and certification; or, it would require the creation of an online database of copyrighted works against which suspect content could be compared. This would be analogous to the creation of a worldwide fingerprint database, only orders of magnitude more difficult.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.70805
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.73089
VADER
-0.871
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0927405315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0522002112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0332588708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0220934511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0215346357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0151684057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012661925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003444065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000272909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.47865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2674E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.643
Magnitude:
137
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.2
Gunning-Fog Score
18.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
51
Sprache Difficult Word Count
49

Craig Barrett

Beyond these considerations, there are serious consumer privacy concerns about any technology that would "look" at everything you send or receive over the Internet or require review and approval for home movies and other personal content. Our company suffered a substantial consumer backlash from a much more benign technology, the processor serial number, because of the possibility of consumers being tracked through that identifier. Here we are talking about actually screening transmitted content without consent, which in other contexts we would consider a gross invasion of privacy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0863863039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0473565335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.041270291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0127163396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029065724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027363159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0024037812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003539731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001384127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.81171E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.84515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
51.574
Magnitude:
87
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
33.163
Magnitude:
87
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Craig Barrett

I mention these difficulties not as a justification for piracy, but simply to illustrate the complexity of the problem. Solving it will require hard work from all relevant industry sectors.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.392
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0594040961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0130823304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0130674438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0107022795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014965302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004179188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002267057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001649394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001238122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.04073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.05468E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
78.188
Magnitude:
30
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Craig Barrett

Broad government mandates are not a solution Nevertheless, there are content providers who urge upon us a pervasive system of government regulation to implement these ideas, and advocate the development of an "open", mandatory standard that would implement this Internet surveillance. It is suggested that this surveillance could be accomplished with an "eighty cent chip".
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.425
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0514977961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0102324237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0079745216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0053389096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027148048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010440202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009395828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001305221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.05333E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.5326E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.204E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.07
Magnitude:
55
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
20.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Craig Barrett

This is pie-in-the-sky, back-of-the-envelope cost estimating that has no relation to the realities of our industry. There are at least three fundamental issues, which are ignored in this scenario.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0258412852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0118241456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070691967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037271449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002834712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002019034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001605363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001138139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.65865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.04028E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.803E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
93.436
Magnitude:
29
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Craig Barrett

First, as I have said, their is no known technical solution to the peer-to-peer piracy of unprotected content, and thus direct costs of any future solutions cannot be estimated.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.178
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0367254514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0311284326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0277145446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042077856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040207913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014745562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008731486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.90886E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.04057E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.40446E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0761E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.498
Magnitude:
29
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Craig Barrett

Second, broad regulatory mandates would place all of the monetary, product performance costs, and loss of consumer goodwill on the shoulders of the IT industry. In the end, regulatory mandates for an unspecified technology of unknown cost amounts to a compulsory license imposed upon the IT industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0123613383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033740926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033443292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011958527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008571192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003577612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.94214E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.59842E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.19918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.7237E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
37.824
Magnitude:
47
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
35.764
Magnitude:
47
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Craig Barrett

Third, and most important, there are the hidden costs of slower innovation, diversion of investment capital, and lost ground in the global race for technological leadership that would follow from the insertion of a bureaucratic process into our product design work. These are costs that we cannot afford to pay.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
0.357
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0651618699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0242553841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0179372102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0146726612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010263062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006511373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003159651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.4659E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.9987E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.27577E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.431E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
32.96
Magnitude:
50
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Craig Barrett

The DMCA: balancing copyrights, innovation, and consumer expectations In short, our message is that the marketplace has largely worked, in precisely the manner envisioned by the DMCA. The DMCA generally rejected mandates in favor of consensual standards. It also granted powerful new enforcement tools to content owners to give strength to the technical solutions arrived at in inter-industry efforts. Having been given this direction by Congress, we in the IT industry have come through with effective content protection tools that are available today, at reasonable cost -- certainly for new digital media products.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.66501
VADER
0.935
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0497609377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020326728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020024368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017567625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012085685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005988227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003039503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002551292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001779776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001422422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8236E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
36.751
Magnitude:
93
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
26.384
Magnitude:
93
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44

Craig Barrett

In all of this, however, we cannot lose sight of the consumer. Pursuit of maximum control is not the highest value; there are other values at stake, most importantly consumers' expectations for lawfully using both technology and content for personal use. The challenge is to permit the consumer flexibility and portability in his or her home and personal environment, yet prevent unlawful reproduction and redistribution. Balance is the key, but finding that balance can at times be difficult. Consider these examples: "Cul-de-sac" technologies that do not allow content to be played on different digital devices. I have here an example of that: the "SACD", which is not playable in a PC. This is designed to thwart the customer's ability to make playlists of individual songs or download the songs to a portable player in a protected environment, and it amounts to a limitation on the right to make audio copies, which is recognized in the law. The accommodation of legitimate fair use of content. One good example of this problem, which this Committee has grappled with, is fair use of content in the distance-learning environment. Congress needs to give careful consideration to the question of how consumer expectations for using technology and content, which developed in an analog era, will be preserved in the digital age. Chairman Leahy. Jonathan Taplin is the CEO of Intertainer, which offers broadband video on demand film services in 35 markets, including Vermont and Utah. In some ways, I would like to hear about Mr. Taplin's earlier career when he was road manager for Bob Dylan and The Band, but I would suspect that that would have to be the source of an off-the-record hearing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.86667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.86667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.26868
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45833
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45833
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.96684
VADER
0.954
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0074919066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0036362464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024986286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009740026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005441801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005222331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001068315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.8664E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.7335E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.301E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.9349E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.416
Magnitude:
279
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
98
Sprache Difficult Word Count
97

Jonathan Taplin

With pleasure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0040742689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0023834242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019211622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006540019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002169976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001323201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000121977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.9966E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.0377E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4006E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.181E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Taplin, go ahead.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.006446513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0063575826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052408464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041143325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0034732453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011131721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010890815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007754474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005144663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.20333E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.68863E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Jonathan Taplin

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee. I really welcome the opportunity to come before you this morning to discuss the protection of copyrighted works in a world of digital media.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.834
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0412160094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0179959519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032250904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026960097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011710021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000566216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004713354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.1863E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.84199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.55242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.22933E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
63.984
Magnitude:
52
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Jonathan Taplin

I have been fortunate enough since I graduated from Princeton in 1969 to work with a lot of great artists, including Bob Dylan and The Band, George Harrison, Martin Scorsese, Gus Van Sant, Wim Wenders, the Coen Brothers, and so I really take seriously the notion that protection of artists' rights are important.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.76
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0150965905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0137096853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057490462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003861501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017899169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007222925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002403731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.61338E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.95742E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6941E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.582
Magnitude:
55
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
20.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Jonathan Taplin

Because I have been around the entertainment business for quite a long time, I have seen the entertainment companies say that the audio cassette was going to kill the record industry, that the video cassette was going to kill the movie industry, and now that digital distribution of content is going to kill both industries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.889
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0492010673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0196782319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050172039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049669754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022749953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008822596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007457278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7439E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.7028E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.0226E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4608E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.035
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Jonathan Taplin

I must say that the company I lead today, Intertainer, started in 1996 with the notion that digital broadband networks would be the conduit for on-demand delivery of the best of American and world culture into the home. We have been able to realize that vision and in the last few years we have, in fact, earned the trust and licensed content from many of the leading Hollywood media companies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.94444
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual > Minors
0.0334049517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0130220171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0107171385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083453058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034792425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0026069634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001316646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000117215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001127653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.36569E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.15203E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.151
Magnitude:
50
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.5
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

Even though in the last year some of the major studios have withdrawn these content licenses, today Intertainer's service features content from 65 different media companies, including major studios such as Warner Brothers, DreamWorks, MGM, and television networks such as NBC, ESPN, Discovery Channel, PBS, BBC and the A&E Network.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0220845002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0190037332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020250456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019037812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006767869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005457704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003443842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.16647E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.27544E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0589E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.3011E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.695
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Jonathan Taplin

We have this content because the content owners trust us to protect it, and the content is all digitally encrypted at the source and protected by a commercially available digital rights management system that is part of the Microsoft Windows Media Player. A similar DRM system built by InterTrust is also offered with a real media player. It is my belief that continually innovating new DRM systems are being continually improved, including ones from Intel and other players in the world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.43399
VADER
0.898
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0612068747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0103191429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0046037567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0041133986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036441543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002442223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013510789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011381819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008155108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002976527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.20867E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
63.3
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Jonathan Taplin

I think that the fact that every week my company gets brought a new DRM system, a new encryption technology, says that the technology industry is willing to spend the money to build these tools. The thing that is interesting is that they are continually getting better. In fact, the motion picture engineering group Ampeg has a new XRML interoperability standard that most of the major companies have signed on to. So I think there is continuous innovation in this world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0318608276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0108696579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0049744838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036483616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024091603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014912589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009777112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008854348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004325841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.26667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.66
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

I think that the bigger problem for myself, my company and many people in this industry is that we have been told that broadband won't grow until content gets on the network, and so we have a kind of classic chicken-and-egg problem here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.66
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0055230037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0048602382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045961107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030866035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001797671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004987221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001619496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.03852E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.34637E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7288E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2096E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.978
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Jonathan Taplin

The problem for me is not with content. We have over 70,000 hours of content that we can put out on the network, but it is more like if you imagine picking up your telephone and every other time you couldn't get a dial tone. That is equivalent to what is happening in broadband today. Essentially, networks are being over-subscribed, so that the average user has no idea of the quality of the service that he is getting.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.31015
VADER
-0.001
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0355067285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0297869265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0070032263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065366323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0064519321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025324654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013069623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.96258E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.2791E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5665E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.241E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.017
Magnitude:
87
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Jonathan Taplin

So, for me, I need a service of 500 kilobits per second, and I will just quickly show you what it looks like at 500 kilobits per second. I will play a movie here off my service. I am asked to confirm the purchase and then I can take it to full screen. I need this 500-kilobits-per-second service and I need it to be consistent. If, on a bad night, a user gets 96K based on thinking that they have got a broadband service, that is a real problem.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.46667
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.46667
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.93827
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0264279166
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025154794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0009510444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003211202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002585344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002215308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001666793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.67255E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.429E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.3323E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.6359E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.423
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.3
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
5.4
SMOG Index
8.4
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Jonathan Taplin

I think the fact that less than 6 percent of the optical fiber that was laid down in the tech boom of the last four years is in use should concern not only investors in Cisco, Nortel, Lucent, and Intel, but also educators, medical professionals, and every artist interested in reaching an audience with film, a song, or a game.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.696
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0210398823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048697766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.00256358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013596797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009837569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006041689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004158071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.46636E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.50141E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9116E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6155E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.462
Magnitude:
76
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

With the right regulatory guidance, we could offer interactive DVD-quality video on demand service to almost every home and classroom in the country by the end of 2003. This service could retrain workers in their homes, provide inexpensive video conferencing, allow doctors to have access to specialists for consultation, and provide an open platform for the film makers and musicians of the country to reach their audience without having to pay most of their income to gatekeepers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.157
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0128732718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036199399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009937596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004892252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003404006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.51171E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.60573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6733E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.3106E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2587E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4864E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.847
Magnitude:
83
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Jonathan Taplin

So in the end I am very hopeful and I have a lot of optimism that we will have -- we have spent as a country $1 trillion on optical fiber and we are either going to use it or we are going to lose it. The fact that every third day some optical fiber company goes into bankruptcy says to me that we have to figure out a way, having built the information highway, to put the on and off ramps onto it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.656
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3763750661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1290835207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0943729421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0290208962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0097476041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032541182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010141367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002617773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001606571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001322972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.96365E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Jonathan Taplin

Thank you very much.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0128379426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0063758751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035954337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010093279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007148285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006736247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005055507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.55113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.35591E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2916E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9886E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Note

[Video shown.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0080832244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0059003381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019223628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012777747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001948775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001338439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.33007E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.65493E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.69292E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.5075E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7519E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
22.527
Magnitude:
7
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Patrick Leahy

That was fascinating. What is the movie?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.542
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.5281035323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.4922211636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2659564139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0353232259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0310823496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0133737674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0034192104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0007280456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004736831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.10186E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.65455E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
37.263
Magnitude:
12
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.3
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
1.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Jonathan Taplin

It is called "Art of War." It is a Warner Brothers movie.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.599
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0993983936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0547552831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.013429868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0120796183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026722197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022862028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007872074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005946541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003605145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.42787E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.77387E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.578
Magnitude:
24
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
95
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
4.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Patrick Leahy

I just want to make sure I understand the technology. Is that movie being streamed out in real time or are you downloading it?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0476753485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0067380126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034396147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019358607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001112512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005469954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004680918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004620673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001934209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6568E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4614E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.682
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Jonathan Taplin

We are using open IP networks, either DSL modems or cable modems, in college dormitories. We believe there are about 21 million computers that I would call residential computers -- that is, excluding the office market -- that have access to a potentially 500-kilobit or better network.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0213202598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0072791838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0069120848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013642022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013480006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002637654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001143097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.89819E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.56096E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.21928E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.09012E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.932
Magnitude:
42
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Jonathan Taplin

The problem is simply a matter of this over-subscription and it is a fairly simple issue. The networks are trying to sign on as many customers at $49.95 as possible without making the purchase of another optical fiber loop in the local loop.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.7388490718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.6662149914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0633298594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0446212827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0156212031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0135241688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0122317389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0020234665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0013488505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0013166979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002248549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.942
Magnitude:
26
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

Yes, that is a problem. In rural areas, it is a problem when they do the same thing on the satellites and you suddenly get overloaded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0167359802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000804425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006937772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006609617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002742678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002388722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001259617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.44587E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.56365E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2938E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.6692E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.217
Magnitude:
47
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Jonathan Taplin

Yes, it is an over-subscription matter. I mean, we all know what happened on 9/11 in New York City. If everyone wants to pick up the phone at the same time, there is no phone service. The problem obviously with broadband is that is what happens every day.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.273
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0093611096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0081566286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0052525949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009306179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003874684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002185496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.79703E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.40181E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.7271E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.603E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.923E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
55.197
Magnitude:
129
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
22.809
Magnitude:
129
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Taplin follows:] Statement of Jonathan Taplin, CEO, Intertainer, Inc. Mr. Chairman, Senator Hatch, members of the committee, I welcome the opportunity to come before you this morning to discuss the protection of copyrighted works in a world of digital media. I have been fortunate enough in my career to work with many great artists and so I take seriously the responsibility of making sure that the artist profits from his efforts. I started out in 1969 after graduating from Princeton as the tour manager for Bob Dylan and The Band. I produced George Harrison's Concert For Bangladesh. I've produced films with Martin Scorsese, Gus Van Sant, Wim Wenders and The Coen Brothers and as an investment advisor I was involved in the two biggest media transactions of the 1980's: Disney and Viacom.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.952
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0027988995
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002091603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019994104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011284924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008711134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005055816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005009496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004021284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003286269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.76595E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3265E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.635
Magnitude:
321
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
51
Sprache Difficult Word Count
58

Jonathan Taplin

The company that I lead today, Intertainer, was started in 1996 with the notion that digital broadband networks would be the conduit for on demand delivery of the best of American culture into the home. My vision is to enable Americans to have instant access to the immense library of film, television and music content that this country's artists have been producing for decades. The early films of Charlie Chaplin; the gospel performances of Aretha Franklin; all the wonderful artistic work that formed my real education was waiting in dusty vaults to be digitized and experienced by a new generation. Over the last five years, we at Intertainer have in fact earned the trust of and licensed content from many of Hollywood's leading media companies. Today, the Intertainer service features content from 65 different media companies including major movie studios such as Warner Bros., DreamWorks and MGM and television networks such as NBC, ESPN, The Discovery Channel, PBS, The BBC, and A&E. In addition, we also feature concerts and music videos from all of the affiliate labels under the Warner Music Group and EMI banners. As you know, over the past several years these and other record companies have experienced indoctrination by fire in terms of digital piracy. But with Intertainer, Americans who have sufficient broadband connection speeds can watch recent theatrical releases, classic films, concerts, television shows and much more with a completely legitimate, secure service that offers an excellent user experience, as well as a new revenue stream for content owners. This unprecedented digital delivery of premiere Hollywood content would only be possible if the content owners felt that their product was being rigorously secured and that the end-user was getting a high quality viewing experience. As you can see from this demonstration of the service, Intertainer represents the convergence of secure digital delivery and broadband connectivity to give American consumers a new way to control and enjoy their entertainment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.1431
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.64
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.64
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.4744
VADER
0.981
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0153314555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0048271013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015955142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008819063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006605125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004086125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004053967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.68175E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.55597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.02954E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.54E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
57.282
Magnitude:
207
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
120
Sprache Difficult Word Count
109

Jonathan Taplin

This content is all digitally encrypted and protected by a commercially available digital rights management system that is bundled into Microsoft's popular Windows Media Player. A similar DRM system built by Intertrust is offered with another leading digital media player from Real Networks. It is my belief that these and other DRM systems that are available and in use today are continually improving their encryption scheme and that they already provide artists and copyright holders with a powerful tool to sell their content in a digital world with a high degree of security. I don't believe that either Microsoft or Intertrust would argue that the DRM systems are absolutely uncrackable, but I do know that both organizations have been able to respond very quickly to attacks and change the encryption, thus rendering the hack unusable. In addition, my company is continuously exposed to a steady stream of entrepreneurs showing us new DRM products in development, which I believe is a strong indication that the traditional innovation that has come out of the US software industry will continue to develop more mature digital rights management products. The genius of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is that it encourages this innovation while providing legal protection for the copyright holders.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.16705
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.76744
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.76744
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0108072221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0066368411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002395435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008535985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008069751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003071896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002330058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.58201E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.35697E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.14101E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9966E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.348
Magnitude:
221
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
82
Sprache Difficult Word Count
68

Jonathan Taplin

I realize that there is considerable discussion going on in Congress about the need to legislate an open-standards digital rights management solution, but it is my strong belief that Congressional intervention is not necessary. As I've outlined, the marketplace is already working aggressively to meet the need for effective DRM solutions. A government-mandated solution would take considerable time to develop and implement, and in the meantime, content owners may seize the opportunity to withhold content from legitimate services such as mine until the new standard is adopted. Certain media CEO's will tell you that unless you mandate a foolproof copy protection system, they will never put their content on digital broadband networks. I have another point of view on this. Historically, open standards solutions are behind the curve in terms of attracting the capital and talent to keep them bullet proof. Private companies, in the interest of competition and innovation, are more incented to constantly refine and improve their products in order to maintain market share. With an open- standards solution, the inability to formulate a rapid response to inevitable security breaches is a fatal flaw. The system is working right now. Premiere Hollywood content is being digitally distributed and secured right now. A federally mandated open-standards solution would put a halt to DRM innovations and possibly cripple services like Intertainer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.22222
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.22222
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.42744
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46875
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46875
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.994
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0107983949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0076538352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008949411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003816477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002768957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001065322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.30205E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.59777E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.44469E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.08159E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6786E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.289
Magnitude:
228
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
89
Sprache Difficult Word Count
84

Jonathan Taplin

Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, I would argue that a standard for digital rights management is not the source of our digital piracy problems. It is my steadfast belief that the private sector already has developed DRM solutions that are more than adequate, and that technology companies will bring DRM innovation to a fever pitch once a more fundamental, underlying issue is addressed. That issue is the standardization of the broadband industry. What we have here is a classic chicken and egg scenario multiplied several times over: content owners will not allow their content to be legitimately digitally distributed until the digital rights management issue is sufficiently addressed; the technology companies in the DRM space are not maximizing their resources to further innovate because there is a dearth of legitimate content being made available for digital distribution over the Internet; digital content, particularly long-form streaming video content, can only be enjoyed with a high-speed, broadband Internet connection; consumers need an incentive, such as compelling content, to switch from their current dial-up modems to high-speed broadband services offered by DSL and cable modem providers; consumers who do decide to move up from a 56k modem to a broadband service are often frustrated because there is no guaranteed minimum connection speed for broadband subscribers, therefore many of today's broadband customers can't even take advantage of so-called broadband services.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.28571
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.28571
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.54654
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.56522
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.56522
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.24594
VADER
0.426
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0360720325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0145221566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0118788652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.008621571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002485977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002375684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012682228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010121986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005503522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001312474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.44484E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.318
Magnitude:
206
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
93
Sprache Difficult Word Count
78

Jonathan Taplin

To further illustrate this point, imagine picking up your telephone and not getting a dial tone on random occasions. Imagine still that you perceived that as normal. That's the experience of today's broadband Internet user, who has no guaranteed minimum connection speed and often finds that their high-priced, high-speed service is scarcely crawling above dial-up. Is this the fulfillment of the broadband promise? Many broadband providers are out in the marketplace today advertising the revolutionary benefits consumers will realize with these fast connections. Benefits such as distance learning, video conferencing, and access to enormous libraries of entertainment instantly available with the click of a mouse. But content providers looking to stonewall digital distribution until they find a way to become the digital gatekeepers will say that those vast entertainment libraries accessible via broadband services will never be made available to the citizens of this country until the digital rights management issue is addressed. Some studios that licensed to us in the past using our existing DRM system have indeed withdrawn their licenses in the last year and created a classic supply demand squeeze. My contention is that the DRM issue is being addressed; it's the distribution network for this wealth of digital content that needs attention.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.62162
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.62162
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.40282
VADER
0.893
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0545331684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.022265187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0158127412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0051438288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.004760786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005821668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004201811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003732601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003176071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.34062E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.15466E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.617
Magnitude:
132
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
81
Sprache Difficult Word Count
71

Jonathan Taplin

The fact that less than 6% of the optical fiber that was laid down in the tech boom of the last four years is in use should concern not only investors in Cisco, Nortel and Lucent, but also educators, medical professionals and every artist interested in reaching an audience with a film, a song or a game. With the right regulatory guidance we could offer interactive DVD quality video on demand service to most every home and classroom in the country by the end of 2003. This service could retrain workers in their homes, provide inexpensive video conferencing, allow doctors to have access to specialists for consultation and provide an open platform for the filmmakers and musicians of the country to reach their audience without having to pay most of their income to gatekeepers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.41369
VADER
0.77
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1058159163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0320579624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0058792026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040682626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023992945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001540869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010953333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.35116E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.982E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.075E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7362E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.76
Magnitude:
94
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42

Jonathan Taplin

To achieve this transformation the FCC would simply have to mandate a truth in advertising policy in regards to broadband. Today if you buy broadband service from your local telephone company, cable company or ISP you are offered "up to 1.5 MBPS". You are not told what the minimum level of service is. Broadband providers are "oversubscribing" their networks in order to maximize profits on broadband service. But to deliver advanced video services a minimum of 750 KBPS is required to the home for VHS video quality. For DVD quality a minimum of 1 MBPS is required.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.23676
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0147861443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0134593036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0125682796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070330883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043478998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004779581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002168368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.04208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.16766E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.5907E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0082E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.835
Magnitude:
164
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Jonathan Taplin

I have to confess that I have a great deal of optimism for what a world of on demand media might look like. A few years ago, Bruce Springsteen wrote a song that typifies many Americans' view of television . . . "57 Channels and Nothing On". Going forward our country has a choice of two visions of what our media culture might look like. One might be 500 channels (owned by 6 corporations) and nothing on. The other might allow consumers easy on-demand access to a world of unique artistry of such power and grace as would melt the heart. I believe that the same innovative spirit that allowed me to show you "Shrek" running over a telephone line this morning will continue to improve the current protection of all forms of digital intellectual property. While I believe that Congress can play a major role in moving us towards the world of digital abundance, trying to set a national encryption policy is surely not the way to get there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.62963
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.62963
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.40877
VADER
0.99
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0557350751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0376340526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0147755884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0112269525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0049440794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047692654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004338651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.58487E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.7989E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.309E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
24.987
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
51

Patrick Leahy

Joe Kraus is the cofounder of Excite.com and a new consumer organization called DigitalConsumer.org. He graduated in the early 1990s from Stanford and he borrowed the huge venture capital sum of $15,000 and built the Internet search engine Excite, which later became Excite At Home.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2465990372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0475654087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0072120798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036523616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018687284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009543889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002321607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001087425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.05889E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.5958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.13056E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Kraus, we are delighted to have you here. Please go ahead, sir.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.681
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1999791013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0465446821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0386120257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.027375482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0174699686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0075788026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0050522674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0043434862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.002836099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019802315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002993051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
47.072
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
98.3
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Joe Kraus

Thank you. Chairman Leahy, I am glad you mentioned Amy Harmon's piece in the New York Times this morning. I do think it outlines the issue well. However, it is not just Hollywood versus technology. As Walt Mosberg's piece in the Wall Street Journal pointed out this morning, there is a third actor in this play and that third actor is the customer, the consumer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.765
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0027973061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025087927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019601013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005635726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001188556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.05975E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.93904E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.12963E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.58304E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1208E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.963E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.2
Gunning-Fog Score
7.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

In fact, we will put Mr. Mosberg's column, one I read every time, part of the record.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0423480669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0125706414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0098758581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072832241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023742183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011715372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005337942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002005694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.83142E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.32924E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.351E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.009
Magnitude:
44
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.7
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.3
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Joe Kraus

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0840685039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0170891013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0143476689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.007655003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002198716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014463683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001383077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.10554E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.55959E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.51165E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.2042E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.748
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Joe Kraus

That consumer legally buys digital media and expects to use it in flexible ways, and it is these consumers whom we hope to represent and who we hope have a seat at the table where decisions are being made that affect their daily lives.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2266661031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0750315667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0428379688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0132187997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0104736762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.005219943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009850628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003112683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002358291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.23775E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.33354E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
39.294
Magnitude:
57
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Joe Kraus

So my name again is Joe Kraus and I am cofounder of DigitalConsumer.org. We are new consumer advocacy organization comprised of executives, entrepreneurs, innovators and consumers who want to protect a consumer's personal use rights in the digital media world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0166874277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095155046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022685805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000813281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002963201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002075989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002031912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.288E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.0046E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.942E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0741E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
34.499
Magnitude:
52
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
33.801
Magnitude:
52
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Joe Kraus

Before I begin the substance of my testimony, I want to make sure I stress one point. I am a proponent of intellectual property. I am a technology entrepreneur and I started a company and made money from strong intellectual property protection. So simply put, I am an IP believer, but I am concerned about recent trends.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.654
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0262053596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.010540022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0045565896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034208184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011981278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001996924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.74514E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.15719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.6209E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.3523E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1536E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.725
Magnitude:
76
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Joe Kraus

Historically, our country has really enjoyed a balance between the rights of citizens and the rights of copyright- holders. Generally speaking, rights-holders have the exclusive right to distribute and profit from the distribution of artistic works. Consumers who legally acquire these works are then free to use them in certain non-commercial ways.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0029389463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006235523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005288826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003276837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002310312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002241678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.63464E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.22322E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4124E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.2774E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8529E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
97.473
Magnitude:
36
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

For example, we are all used to buying a CD and making a tape of it. We are all used to buying a CD and listening to it in our car, making a tape to listen to in our car. We are used to recording a football game so we can watch it after our child's soccer practice. So essentially we are used to having flexible use as to how we use the media we acquire.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0140110351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083386869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0035373821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012746467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003630272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000349699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002465344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002085313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.81385E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6621E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9314E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
77.767
Magnitude:
112
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
5.3
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Joe Kraus

But unfortunately this balance has really shifted dramatically in recent years, much to the detriment of consumers, but also entrepreneurs and the risk capital markets, and let me give you some examples, starting with the consumer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
-0.519
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0484809803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0275066093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039374339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025717389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014578373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011185727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001124849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.32837E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.17382E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.8919E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.9682E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
46.093
Magnitude:
96
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
28.029
Magnitude:
96
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Joe Kraus

This past Christmas, I bought my dad a DVD player and within two weeks I got a phone call and he said, it is broken. I said, why do you think it is broken? He said, well, when you put the DVD in -- and as he had been accustomed to with his videotapes, when the movie previews came up he went to skip through them, but now the DVD player wouldn't let him. I told him that his DVD player wasn't broken, but that existing law made it illegal to create a DVD player that would skip through content flagged as "must watch." He didn't know what I was talking about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
-0.596
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0216414235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.01480176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0046320376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002436001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012066153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005858326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002907448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001158274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.15259E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.3908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0124E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
8.4
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Joe Kraus

Similarly, my mom bought an MP3 player recently. In early February, I got a phone call from her saying my MP3 player is broken. When I asked why, she said that she had been putting CDs on her MP3 player, but that a couple of the CDs she bought recently didn't seem to transfer. I told her she probably had some of those new copy-protected CDs. She asked what that meant and I explained that while she was granted the right in the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act to make personal-use copies of CDs she bought --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.115
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0126238898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0110687455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0094560848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050973711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015185463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008796502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008699685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004161296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001730713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.5749E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7303E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

Somebody has got an important phone call. If they would like to leave to take the phone call, we will allow that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0035254772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014872496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006026244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005021545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002160858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00013888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001034941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.42763E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.26106E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9347E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.5882E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

Go ahead.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.6400739308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2507194178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.163694052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0275814265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0235678992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0076700038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0019544701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001847616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001620896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.97082E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0538E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
44.487
Magnitude:
51
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
22.281
Magnitude:
51
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Joe Kraus

Sure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0127039995
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0113747556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0083863983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027381955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017979815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015934476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004765716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.97291E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.44992E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.85882E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.61834E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.912
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Joe Kraus

So I explained that while she was granted in 1992 the right to make personal-use copies of those CDs, in 1998 her ability to do so was taken away if record companies tried to prevent the making of those personal-use copies. As you can imagine, she didn't know what I was talking about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0143805257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0016247543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006175108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002741371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002411011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002309722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000128401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.46187E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.4878E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5799E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.271E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
77.464
Magnitude:
38
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Joe Kraus

So now I have a big "x" marked on my calendar waiting for the phone call from my parents when the new digital television standards are implemented because the standards clearly envision a market where a network broadcaster like Disney's ABC gets to decide what programs my parents are allowed to record and which ones they aren't. And I can just hear them saying, Joe, why can you record the nightly news but not "Everybody Loves Raymond"?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.106
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0032579592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020966314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0013591001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004447788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004239591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003501763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003229488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.55311E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.02107E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.8197E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.789E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
37.634
Magnitude:
55
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
32.462
Magnitude:
55
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Joe Kraus

So the solutions the content industry have advanced to date have been more effective at preventing my mom from copying her legally-bought music to her MP3 player than at diminishing major commercial piracy operations in China and Taiwan.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.714
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0174468791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0055277615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047848956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006467322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003747535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003721011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002501082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001737906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.83716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.84176E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.4641E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.118
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Joe Kraus

I agree with Professor Felten's written testimony that copy protection isn't breakable by my mother, but it is very breakable by many people with computer backgrounds. So when we debate how we prevent illegal copying, my parents, unbeknownst to them, are losing their historic personal-use rights. I think this is wrong and cannot continue unabated.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.813
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
19.4446027279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.2146762097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.010630746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036872108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027434804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004749251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001306987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001229938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.29406E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.20643E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
78.774
Magnitude:
74
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Joe Kraus

I want to stress also that the cloud around personal use rights affects not only consumers but the capital markets as well. Major media companies have used lawsuits and attempts to stop or delay consumer electronics devices that deal with personal use. It began with the VCR, continued with the MP3 player, and most recently is occurring with the ReplayTV personal video recorder.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
-0.696
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0329082395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056265868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041065043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001814118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004809025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002341193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001955604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001667095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.82593E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.44168E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.3935E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
95.415
Magnitude:
68
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Joe Kraus

When new consumer electronics introductions yield new lawsuits from the media companies, these lawsuits inhibit investment. Geoff Yang, head venture capitalist at Silicon Valley-based Redpoint Ventures and lead investor in Tivo, which is a personal video recording company, put it this way: "Given the current state, I can't see how we could invest in another revolutionary consumer technology such as Tivo, given the cloud currently surrounding personal use of the media people already own."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.586
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0791554572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0351871742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0188335194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0105963445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0098114186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001789101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013430192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004143982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001179255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001024382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.30183E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
36.295
Magnitude:
75
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.962
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
6.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Joe Kraus

Our organization therefore is advocating a set of principles we call the Consumer Technology Bill of Rights. It is a proposal we hope this committee will seriously consider, as it is simply an attempt to positively assert the consuming public's personal use rights. These rights aren't new. They are historic rights granted in previous legislation and court rulings which over the last four years have been whittled away.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.13549
VADER
0.765
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0843290123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0510938757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0163230754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0160150274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0136995848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0053570657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024503535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009719695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008613473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000194378
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.64274E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
72.058
Magnitude:
50
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Joe Kraus

These include the right to time shift, to record a television program and watch it later, and the right to space shift, to copy a piece of music from a CD to a Walkman or MP3 player, or to make a mixed tape. The full list of rights can be viewed at our Web site www.digitalconsumer.org, and I am happy to provide a written list to anyone who would like to read them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0303321955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0195285538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098499091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015822889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012364205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003917645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003351826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002490424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.46205E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.7919E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0886E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
34.745
Magnitude:
45
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
33.42
Magnitude:
45
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Joe Kraus

Under the guise of preventing illegal copying, I believe Hollywood is using the legislative process to create new lines of business at the consumer's expense. The goal is to create a legal system that denies consumers their personal use rights and then charge those consumers additional fees to recoup them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.422
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0056644349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001626984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007880668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003627739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002052743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002031116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.82947E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.46985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.2014E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.882E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
48.584
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
23.717
Magnitude:
66
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Joe Kraus

After years of successful litigation and legislative efforts, many in the entertainment industry are back in Washington asking for more changes to the law. All the while, services have been developed and technologies have been developed that eliminate fair use rights for consumers, your constituents.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0053647494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024881399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009218932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004482557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004134598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000279848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001496972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001054182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.57444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3436E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.109E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
43.269
Magnitude:
45
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Joe Kraus

Many in the copyright community don't admit that there are such things as fair use rights, and this denial persists despite 30 years of congressional action and Supreme Court rulings affirming. And while I am not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV, I do know this much: Consumers believe they have personal use rights and they expect Congress to ensure that they are safeguarded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.854
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0517201435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0399214623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0080938611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0057201392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034167821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004130669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002656491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001727003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.99848E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.10823E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2734E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
59.715
Magnitude:
24
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
28.582
Magnitude:
24
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.8
Gunning-Fog Score
18.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

Copy protection, especially overseas piracy for illicit sale, is an important issue. But before this committee considers yet another change in the law at the behest of the copyright owners, I would respectfully urge you to ensure that the interests of the consumer are ensured.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.044582531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040786734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003141665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008940438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000875262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007024635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004474003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002600423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.22289E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.11234E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.11567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Defense
Score:
60.21
Magnitude:
78
Code:
16
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#16
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Kraus, you probably agree with Mr. Barrett that if it is not protected initially, then you probably have lost your ability to protect.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.549
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1030923915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0015142702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011707385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002101809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.0908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.40744E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.89085E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.69095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.9837E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8473E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.061E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.542
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Joe Kraus

I agree with that, and I would point people to Professor Felten's testimony, a respected security expert from Princeton University, who said that a government standard that mandates secure technology is like a government standard for teleportation technology. It is not going to be possible, and any totally secure system isn't possible to build, in my opinion, and certainly in the opinion of greater experts than me. Protecting it at the source is most likely the only way.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0086376662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020326108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009416567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005953526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004753162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000326607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001693401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7127E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.27008E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.1573E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2604E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
44.261
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Kraus follows:] Statement of Joe Kraus, Founder, DigitalConsumer.org Chairman Leahy and members of this committee, good afternoon. My name is Joe Kraus and I am a co-founder of digitalconsumer.org. We are a new consumer advocacy organization comprised of executives, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and consumers who want to protect a consumer's personal use rights in the digital media world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0237487387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0062869294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016581918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010497389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006648326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004742784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003679259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001321458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.98036E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.30722E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5829E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
38.125
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
27.11
Magnitude:
60
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Joe Kraus

Before I begin the substance of my testimony I want to stress one point: I am a proponent of intellectual property. I am a technology entrepreneur. In 1993 I started a company called Excite which after 7 years became the third most trafficked site on the Internet. My professional success depended upon strong intellectual property protection. I am an IP believer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.935
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4223532043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0487164245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0059630744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033418168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010013511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006757918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006515945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002760406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001343675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.0069E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6839E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.325
Magnitude:
79
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Joe Kraus

However, I am concerned about recent trends. Historically, our country has enjoyed a balance between the rights of copyright holders and the rights of citizens who legally acquire copyrighted works. Generally speaking, rights holders have the exclusive right to distribute and profit from artistic works. Consumers who legally acquire these works are free to use them in certain noncommercial ways.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.917
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0985399703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0394323841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0191166444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0163844976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0059000849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0044973258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009204595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002112135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.40114E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.26125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.4202E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.336
Magnitude:
30
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Joe Kraus

For example, we're all used to buying a CD and making a tape of it to listen to in our car. We're used to making mixed tapes of our favorite music. We're used to recording the football game so we can watch it after our child's soccer practice. We're used to buying a book and lending it to a friend. Essentially, we're used to having a reasonable degree of freedom as to how we use the media we buy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.55535
VADER
0.886
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0294558617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0220558824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0126593892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0044666118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022315815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003568323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001184643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.3026E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6439E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.175E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.46E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
96.816
Magnitude:
21
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
9.5
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

It's important to emphasize that these rights are embodied in legislation and court decisions. Congress and the courts have carefully crafted a deliberate balance between media companies and ordinary citizens.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0125148465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0120137047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083767191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0080901416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042410611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011143276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004912656
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.27968E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.69956E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.77918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4098E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
92.384
Magnitude:
10
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Joe Kraus

Unfortunately, this balance has shifted dramatically in recent years, much to the detriment of consumers, entrepreneurs and the risk capital markets.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Self-Harm
0.0475813722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0320442108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0305641355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0186334291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0061640254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045387391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0034279539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029211886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026219381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009065946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002722453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.944
Magnitude:
111
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Joe Kraus

Let me give you some examples, starting with the consumer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0046092566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0024729345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011856948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002982741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002922312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002824332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.19285E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.59605E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.7939E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.069E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.847E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
47.949
Magnitude:
128
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.38
Magnitude:
128
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Joe Kraus

This past Christmas I bought my dad a DVD player. Within two weeks I got a phone call. "It's broken" he insisted. When I asked why, he said that he put a DVD in and as he had become accustomed to doing with his video tapes, when the movie previews came up, he went to skip through them. But now, the DVD player wouldn't let him. I told him that his VD player wasn't broken but that existing law made it illegal to create a DVD player that would skip through content that the media companies flagged as "must watch". Needless to say he didn't know what I was talking about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
-0.611
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0082731058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0058894941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033780976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014186181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003422785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.59374E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
3.35776E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.59437E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.98273E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.9921E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8926E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.844
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Joe Kraus

Similarly, my mom bought an MP3 player recently. In early February I got a phone call from her saying "my MP3 player is broken". I asked why. She said that she had been putting CDs on her MP3 player but that a couple of the CDs she recently bought didn't seem to transfer. I told her she probably had some of the new "copy protected" CDs. She asked what that meant. I explained that while she was granted the right in the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act to make personal use copies of CDs, in 1998 her ability to do so was taken away if the record companies tried to prevent the making of those personal use copies. Needless to say, she didn't know what I was talking about either.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.813
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0042226955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027142532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023091641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004106357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002006184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001809759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.54045E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.05407E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.5404E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.6721E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.64E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
77.464
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Joe Kraus

I now have a big X marked on my calendar waiting for the phone call from my parents when the new digital television standards are implemented. The standards currently envision a market where a network broadcaster like Disney's ABC gets to decide what programs my parents are allowed to record and which ones they aren't. I can just hear them saying "Joe, why can we record the nightly news but not `Everybody Loves Raymond?' "
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
-0.112
Leans Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0500901777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002040459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020208226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017664155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012040727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005998155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003055642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002506569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001799145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001425733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8216E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
63.928
Magnitude:
113
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Joe Kraus

While I understand the desire of the content industry to prevent illegal copying, I believe it would be a disservice to the hundreds of millions of law abiding consumers in this country if the debate over preventing illegal copying suddenly stripped them of their ability to record TV shows they've paid for in their cable bill or copy CDs they've bought onto their MP3 players to listen to them in the gym.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
-0.494
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0180597068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0059196296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019036432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013108354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010682421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003754339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001810724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000168324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.70125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9995E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.65592E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
72.141
Magnitude:
31
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
3.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Joe Kraus

The solutions that the content industry has advanced to date have been more effective at preventing my mom from copying her legally bought music to her MP3 player than at diminishing major commercial piracy operations in China and Taiwan. As we all know, copy protection isn't breakable by my mother, but is very breakable by many people with computer backgrounds. In addition, I believe that the effect of denying citizens their personal use rights is to drive consumers toward illegal downloading. If I buy a CD that I can't put on my MP3 player, but I can illegally download a song that I can take anywhere, which one am I going to choose?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.45199
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
-0.715
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0069277172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056317676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049452585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008561077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004953255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001686299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001110534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.82817E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.48877E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.86143E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.4435E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
91.412
Magnitude:
18
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
39

Joe Kraus

In the debate over how we prevent illegal copying, my parents, unbeknownst to them, are losing their historic personal use rights. This is wrong and cannot be allowed to continue unabated.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.848
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0505509786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0413088419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0349269743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0098522956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0074841802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0042798376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0032083535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007585194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005703049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001433707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.30102E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Education
Score:
35.828
Magnitude:
99
Code:
6
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#6
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
27.873
Magnitude:
99
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Joe Kraus

The cloud around personal use rights affects not only consumers but innovation and the capital markets as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.723
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0304009533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0143615194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0050868333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00392033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006599974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001288095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.03038E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.87999E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.03919E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.43217E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5414E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.379
Magnitude:
64
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Joe Kraus

My business partner, Graham Spencer, is a computer programmer. Much of his time is spent getting different software systems to talk to one another. The act of examining a legally acquired computer program or hardware device for the purpose of analysis, debugging, or compatibility has traditionally been considered a "fair use." However, the same laws that are depriving consumers of their fair use rights are also being applied to programmers. The result is a chilling effect on software and hardware innovation. The problem is severe enough to have attracted the attention of some of the country's best software engineers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0137624709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013893715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010518262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008711516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007449154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006132151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002186711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001868189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001734732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.57098E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.6348E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.307
Magnitude:
94
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Joe Kraus

In addition, major media companies have used lawsuits in attempts to stop or delay consumer electronics devices that deal with personal use; it began with the introduction of the VCR, continued with the MP3 player and most recently is occurring with the ReplayTV personal video recorder. These devices were all designed to make it easier for consumers to enjoy the media they paid for.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0578068604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0321992615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0064466556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023172666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011038091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005212932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003636683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002798216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002754828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.75748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.263
Magnitude:
143
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Joe Kraus

However, when new consumer electronics introductions yield new lawsuits from the media companies, these lawsuits inhibit investment. Geoff Yang, head venture capitalist at silicon-valley based Red Point Ventures and lead investor in Tivo, a personal video recording technology company, puts it this way: "given the current state of the DMCA, I can't see how we could invest in another revolutionary consumer technology such as TiVo given the cloud currently surrounding personal use of the media people already own. This issue must be resolved before venture investment to seed the consumer technology future can continue."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
-0.477
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0023649443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010160205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004992074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000357153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003411751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002384033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001016407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8424E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.06062E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.993E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.47E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
51.166
Magnitude:
50
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
25.885
Magnitude:
50
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
12.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Joe Kraus

Our organization therefore is advocating a set of principles we call the "consumer technology bill of rights". It is a proposal we hope this Committee will seriously consider as it is simply an attempt to positively assert the consuming public's personal use rights. These rights aren't new; they are historic rights granted in previous legislation and court rulings which have over the last four years been whittled away. These include the right to "time-shift" -- to record a television program and watch it later; and the right to "space shift" -- to copy a piece of music from a CD to a walkman or MP3 player or to make a mixed tape. The full list of rights can be viewed at our web site, www.digitalconsumer.org or I'm happy to provide a written list to anyone who would like to read them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.9
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.9
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0157731673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037703052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018064598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010522194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009920835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007542808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.5151E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.82529E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.68028E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.6576E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3958E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.928
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
51

Joe Kraus

Clarifying, asserting, and defending personal use rights is good for consumers and good for investment. Citizens will have a simple, comprehensible set of laws that re-establish rights that they used to have. And, investors will have clarity on those areas that are safe for capital without the risk of litigation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.21888
VADER
0.873
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0044828277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033809563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033753124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025834372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013323391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007875897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003167764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001528823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.86914E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.8593E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7587E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.1
Magnitude:
118
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

Finally, there has been some talk lately of a need to create a government mandated open standard for digital rights management in order to ensure interoperability for consumers. I think a government standard would be harmful to consumers and innovators for several reasons.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1486960799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0194100227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0179293609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0075063304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0033916778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033244585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026473495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003556321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.68899E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.61272E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5188E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
29.582
Magnitude:
57
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Education
Score:
29.062
Magnitude:
57
Code:
6
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#6
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Joe Kraus

First, a government mandated standard is not necessary to ensure interoperability. The market demands interoperability and has no need for the government to insist on it. Examples abound. There is no government mandate for CD player interoperability, yet all CDs play in all CD players. Likewise for DVDS. Consumers don't tolerate the lack of interoperability and as a major market force, they demand it. Therefore, interoperability will occur as a natural effect of the market. (Although no standard has yet emerged for secure digital music, this is due at least in part to the fact that the existing technologies are too burdensome for the consumer. Once a suitably user-friendly technology has emerged, consumers are likely to embrace it.)
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.73089
VADER
-0.1
Leans Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0181587864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057198173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021179372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016654867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015974858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011069801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000303293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001483922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.04971E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3771E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4263E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
43.291
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
22.932
Magnitude:
41
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37

Joe Kraus

Second, government mandates are bad for innovation generally because they assume that the government is able to predict all possible fair and legal uses of technology or content. The very definition of innovation is the discovery of something new and unexpected; by mandating a set of legal uses and criminalizing all others, the government makes innovation difficult.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.45199
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.659
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0510245736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0279145723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0154119087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0031531457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0030468824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015429672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007595503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002488515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.34125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.41242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.783E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
36.281
Magnitude:
113
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
11.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Joe Kraus

Third, overly protective copyright laws themselves contribute to technologies that do not interoperate. Interoperability depends on being able to examine data formats, and as long as such examination is criminalized, companies will be restricted in their ability to create compatible products.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0796379289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0082518716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.006276877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.003521892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018760278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008742109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006075953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005313887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004172148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000368628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001416134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.011
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
2.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Joe Kraus

Finally, if the government decides to mandate an open standard, there is no guarantee it will truly remain open. Microsoft has a history of "embrace and extend" policies where an open standard is adopted and then modified or extended in order to introduce proprietary features which licensing vendors are encouraged to exploit. The new "expanded standard" meets the basic criteria of the open standard, but if this expanded standard is used to its fullest, it will have features that the original open standard cannot understand; therefore, the open standard becomes less and less effective. Examples of this behavior include the Java programming language, the HTML page layout standard, and the Kerberos security technology.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.92593
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.92593
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.87168
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0545012939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0242359893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.015305425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0105434388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0096708136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0072058923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0051338022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005070731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004114275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.01079E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.2336E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
93.209
Magnitude:
49
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
45
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45

Joe Kraus

Overall, I encourage Congress to remain wary of any solution where it is asked to "mandate" standards in the technology industry. Technological innovation moves too quickly and unpredictably to be constrained in this way. In addition, consumers already exert market forces to ensure a reasonable outcome.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.856
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0224091375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070785121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070605798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023251072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018887213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017356717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005957616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002951657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001018541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.18024E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2263E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
55.052
Magnitude:
180
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Joe Kraus

Under the guise of "preventing illegal copying" I believe Hollywood is using the legislative process to create new lines of business at consumers' expense. Their goal is to create a legal system that denies consumers their personal use rights and then charge those consumers additional fees to recoup them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.422
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0133026959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035575922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0031316591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023361514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021322185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020205838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001224585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.24751E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.01383E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.3839E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.235E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Joe Kraus

After years of successful litigation and legislative efforts, many in the entertainment industry are back in Washington asking for more changes to the law. All the while, they have been quietly developing services, technologies and products that eliminate fair use for their customers, your constituents. Many in the copyright community will not admit that there is such a thing as fair use. They will not admit that once consumers have legally purchased media that they should be free to engage with it in a wide variety of personal uses. This denial persists despite 30 years of Congressional action and Supreme Court rulings affirming consumers' fair use rights. And, while I am not a lawyer, I do know this much: consumers believe they have personal use rights and they expect Congress to insure that they are safeguarded. Copy protection, especially overseas piracy for illicit sale, is an important issue. But before this Committee considers yet another change in the law at the behest of the copyright cabal, I would respectfully urge you to insure that the interests of the consumer are insured.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.78571
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.78571
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.98592
VADER
0.98
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0473918684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0066565219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046121942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027918031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005602293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004180839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004018013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002900596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002596872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001551452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001302767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
56
Sprache Difficult Word Count
58

Joe Kraus

Thank you very much for the time to address this committee today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.036888491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0076978999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0070382543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019027158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012987136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007998756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.00040022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002377152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002118455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001445566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001009211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

I should note for the record we have material from Gary Shapiro, of the Home Recording Rights Coalition; Jack Valenti's statement; Hilary Rosen's statement; the Video Software Dealers Association; and Professor Felten's statement, all of which will be part of the record.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0589601754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0198371548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0083369458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0055316847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049279948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004865005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015938216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001034719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.5972E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.63472E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.60539E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
60.751
Magnitude:
97
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.2
Gunning-Fog Score
17.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

Of course, Senator Hatch and I have the Web page we unveiled today, so others can comment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0458113034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095610274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0052535466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0048833841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016699829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012797856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005159324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002074204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002051864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.1167E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.4588E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Patrick Leahy

I would say on the side that when you mention not being able to flip through previews, frankly I am offended by the arrogance of Hollywood doing that. Especially if I paid for a DVD and what not, I want to go and watch what I want to watch on it. It is as bad as paying $8 to go into a theater with the sound-proofing of tissue paper and a screen smaller than my TV set, and you have got to sit there and watch 20 minutes of ads, and then they sometimes wonder why people don't go.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.827
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0068848698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040011499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008551441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005773351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002463124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.57664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.55291E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.44444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.0583E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.29145E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.881E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

Justin Hughes is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where his research and teaching interests focus on intellectual property law. He has also been with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office focusing on Internet-related intellectual property issues, 11th Amendment immunity issues, and intellectual property law in developing countries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.898
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0235430605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0118651325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0097000186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0082662766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038168571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002602438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012902092
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012377809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.001057038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005623822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002527599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.414
Magnitude:
74
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

We are pleased to have you here, and when you finish I will turn first to Senator Feinstein for questions and then to Senator Specter for questions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.8473
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.034245904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0045613633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034760455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034115597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030074576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014071088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009794283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001212179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.04208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.78712E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.1593E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.737
Magnitude:
80
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Justin Hughes

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, for inviting me here to talk today about the continuing saga of copyright and digital technologies. By way of disclosure, I should say that, technically speaking, I am an employee of the State of California, which means that my salary is paid by both Intel and Disney, Viacom and Qualcomm, technicolor and technology-start-ups. So in my testimony there is probably something for everyone to hate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0406566891
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0145845886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0096898664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0029997438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021678245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014660086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002248163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001644878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.47048E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.11641E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3677E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.862
Magnitude:
97
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
25.374
Magnitude:
97
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

I think that we all agree that there is an enormous problem today with unauthorized copying and distribution of digital versions of copyrighted works. The worst part of the problem is still outside the United States and is traditional physical media piracy. Then comes piracy from peer-to-peer network systems that respect no national borders -- Napster, Gnutella, Free Net, and the many variations of Fast Track software. As broadband proliferates, owners of audio-visual works are understandably worried about being Napster-ized.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.354
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2545641502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1667676028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0576638966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0226343516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0054521799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034957586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0032430027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008669703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001245971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.10943E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.07774E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
59.737
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Justin Hughes

Now, recently there have been proposals that the Government should mandate specific copy control technologies to be concluded in all digital devices, and the thought seems to be that industry should negotiate agreement on the technological controls and then the Federal Government should make those controls a matter of law. I have three concerns I want to focus on today about that idea.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0079599493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004049961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.003862871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025407579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001906232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009499323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001912426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.10079E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.7852E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5366E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.3902E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
74.054
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Justin Hughes

The first is that Congress should be cautious in how much it is willing to defer to the policy decisions and legislative drafting of private parties. An agreement brokered in industry negotiations and then blessed by Congress may fail to address the concerns of consumers. Users of copyrighted works have distinct privileges under copyright law, fair use primary among them. Now, I admit sometimes academics overblow fair use rights and privileges, particularly as they extend to making non- transformative copies of works, but I agree with Mr. Kraus that those rights exist and that they are real.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.886
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0233748593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0186652571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0123505932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.005744163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047490103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032104927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012862619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004959621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000303711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002818138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.08423E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.953
Magnitude:
75
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38

Justin Hughes

The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act reflects Congress' reasonable concern for fair use in the digital networked era. The DMCA specifically provides that it does not affect fair use, and section 1201(a) was specifically crafted to make sure that the prohibition on digital lock-picking would not extend to controls for control of copying, precisely because some copying constitutes fair use.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.65
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0189624639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033432101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021377829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017989641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013467631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011634972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009890955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004134326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001093867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.30112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8188E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.129
Magnitude:
54
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Justin Hughes

In that same spirit, I think that if there has to be any additional regulatory structure -- and I say additional -- imposed on digital network systems to protected copyrighted works, it should be one that focuses on stopping unauthorized distribution over the Internet and leaves alone what some people have called the "home net." Whether it is a broadcast flag or water-marking or any other technology, if it is mandated by law, it may be necessary to determine exactly how much non-commercial, non-transformative copying a person can do in their home.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.178
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0207750723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0122573547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0106688072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0090938178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0071171882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017022865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009812719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000710405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001349714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.52123E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6644E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.862
Magnitude:
70
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

My second concern is one that, Mr. Chairman, you and the ranking minority member have already expressed, and that is government just isn't very good at mandating technology. And I don't particularly think that private industry is very good sometimes at mandating technology, and the ease with which various encryption systems have been hacked is demonstrative of that. But I think that government technocrats and bureaucrats, having been one, are even worse at that mission.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.195
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0060137158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020717371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015650039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002133387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001985131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.7187E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.95345E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.19718E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.44665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8801E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.742E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
International Affairs
Score:
69.385
Magnitude:
91
Code:
19
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#19
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Justin Hughes

Related to that, my third concern is that the government mandate of any specific technology to protect copyrighted works would be a dramatic reversal of Congress' approach to the digital world to date. To date, Congress has wisely understood, this committee in particular, that government should not try to pick technological winners and losers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0257018197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0117511401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030632444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030369787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013373483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011774006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002603401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.5326E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.32544E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3895E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.02676E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
39.62
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
32.673
Magnitude:
65
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Justin Hughes

In that spirit, the DMCA wisely includes a no-mandates provision, making clear that consumer electronic, computer, and telecommunications equipment does not have to be designed to respond to any particular technological measure. I think that that hands-off approach of not designating technology for the Internet is one Congress has pursued in many areas, not just copyrighted works. One example I give in my written testimony is the e signatures bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.2427282277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0522444898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0341940497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0239717483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0073555624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054411474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010021747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006732143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000130171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.55393E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.47791E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
30.313
Magnitude:
68
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

Related to this, I have the concern that if we change our policy direction now, we will have a hard time explaining it internationally. Having been one of those people who went around the world explaining the virtues of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and its hands-off approach to the Internet, I would hate to be an American diplomat who had to go around explaining why we had suddenly decided that everything had to be done a completely different way. It makes us look, to put it frankly, a little clueless.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.591
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0245908624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.010055134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030037654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023564411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013845555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009836001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001860313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001156837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.30456E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.62434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.65961E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
33.843
Magnitude:
59
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Justin Hughes

If I can conclude, there are tough decisions to be made in copyright policy, and those decisions may not be too far down the road. Many of the people in this room remember the hearing on Napster and other peer-to-peer file-sharing systems which this committee held in 2000. At that hearing, Chairman Hatch posed a couple of hypotheticals to Hilary Rosen, head of the recording industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.128
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0957182201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0950700487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.019333369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0154455251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0105854473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.006719277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001478146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001191027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001049211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.64368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.79378E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Justin Hughes

Chairman Hatch asked, if he made a tape copy of a CD to play in his car, would that be a fair use? He then asked, if he made a copy of a CD for his wife to play in her car, would that be a fair use? Ms. Rosen demurred from giving a direct answer to Senator Hatch's questions, and given her job I completely understand that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.88
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.057006086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0231682207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0084545376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0083698527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0066287321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015786129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010055312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000229168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.51672E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.85363E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0234E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
5.5
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Justin Hughes

But let me answer those questions a couple of years later. Are those fair uses? My very theoretical, abstract, law professor answer is this: If the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the ranking minority member and the other members think something is a fair use, it is a fair use, or it is soon going to be. [Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1023366582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0232908569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0160822688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0024584966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008127515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005377668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003627631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000137954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001023918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.75665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.11561E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Justin Hughes

And I close there for a very simple reason.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.026999219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.014779222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0071924434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0060999424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006097041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004199576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001215169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.33178E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.29055E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.91679E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.43126E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
55.994
Magnitude:
43
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.9
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.4
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

And we know that the ranking member and I always agree on these things. [Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0149546366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0133997688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0048959271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023378496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016642944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014440075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000603139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.9675E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.78289E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.58024E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.9
Gunning-Fog Score
5.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Justin Hughes

Always agree.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.025725062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0218568995
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0052520238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015168197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010450492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005655236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004572398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003268778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.44707E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.4508E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.601E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
5.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Justin Hughes

So whatever legislation is introduced in other quarters, whatever negotiations are conducted privately, I think it is imperative that this committee not abdicate its traditional job in deciding the proper balance in copyright law for the interests of creators, distributors, consumers and citizens.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1835554955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.129180809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0593784556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0354642194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0084639432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0042244996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040116298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005630542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003181913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003139509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.61001E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
60.277
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Justin Hughes

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0051920368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036588142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034476376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0028678056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020855001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017109271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013449354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005996291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.54229E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.87464E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.8321E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
66.113
Magnitude:
212
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Hughes follows:] Justin Hughes, Visiting Professor of Law, University of California at Los Angeles introduction
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0054812641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0050996077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014725944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014185694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007229009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005184162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000511408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000136549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.45213E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43572E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9217E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
65.122
Magnitude:
42
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Justin Hughes

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Senator Hatch, and members of the Committee for inviting me to appear before you today to talk about the continuing saga of copyright and digital technologies. During the past few years, I've had the honor and pleasure of working with many people in this room on intellectual property and Internet issues, although these days I spend more of my time trying to teach the law Congress has written in this area.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.933
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0353528245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0238302106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0141664277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040432849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007580848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005325728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003004759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001245838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000122617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.16073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.4358E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
25.028
Magnitude:
79
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
22.809
Magnitude:
79
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Justin Hughes

By way of disclosure, I should say that, technically speaking, I'm an employee of the State of California. Which means that my salary is paid by both Intel and Disney, Viacom and Qualcomm, Technicolor and technology start-ups. So, in what I'm going to say, there will probably be something for everyone to hate. I. Challenges to Copyright Holders and Appropriate Responses There is no question that we face an enormous problem today with unauthorized copying and distribution of digital versions of copyrighted works. Copyright holders face this problem and we all face this problem as an increasingly information and media driven economy. The worst part of this problem is probably outside the U.S. and is "traditional" physical media piracy -- as when you can buy a dozen CDs for $5 about 100 paces from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing. Then comes piracy from peer-to-peer network systems that respects no national borders -- Napster, Gnutella, Free Net, and the many variations of Fast Track. Web-based piracy in the form of warz sites; that is, Internet piracy from hosted sites is another level of problem. Finally, there is a certain level of unauthorized activity done by people at home -- typically, until very recently, in the form of taping works onto cassettes and videocassettes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.81818
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.81818
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.21131
VADER
-0.871
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0791477622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0159287054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0088257293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0081677128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0071191906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009104424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004097793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.14729E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.2028E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0482E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.385E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.822
Magnitude:
105
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
71
Sprache Difficult Word Count
70

Justin Hughes

We need to distinguish among these different sorts of activity for two reasons. First, the problem of digital piracy of works -- on physical media and through unauthorized networked distribution -- does threaten the incentive system that copyright is supposed to create.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
-0.178
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0933494768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0169618288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098709905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0072160699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048915641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003319871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012543291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001832091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.81449E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.88603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.75733E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
36.78
Magnitude:
39
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.794
Magnitude:
39
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Justin Hughes

But, second, a certain amount of unauthorized copying by private citizens -- at home, for their own use, and not distributed beyond family and a small circle of friends -- does not threaten the incentive system that copyright creates. And it does serve valuable goals in a civil society. In short, it should not be lumped with the other activities; it is not "piracy" -- indeed, much of this unauthorized copying has been expressly sanctioned by our highest court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.857
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0027361202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019074869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007726356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006260543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006054113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002193152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.93324E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.39172E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.57264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.19197E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7045E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.197
Magnitude:
107
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

To date, the efforts to fight digital piracy of copyrighted works has been twofold. First, head-on efforts to shut down unauthorized Internet distribution -- as in the Napster litigation. Second, the content industry and the consumer electronics industry have worked together in private, voluntary, industry-led collaborations to design protection measures: measures to keep unauthorized digital copies of works from being captured, so there would be nothing illicit to distribute on the Net. These can be industry standards -- as with the CSS encryption for DVDs -- or competing technological approaches to security, such as the differing digital rights management (DRM) systems of RealNetworks and Microsoft.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.5506
VADER
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0497609377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020326728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020024368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017567625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012085685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005988227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003039503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002551292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001779776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001422422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8236E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
48.864
Magnitude:
78
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
26.207
Magnitude:
78
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44

Justin Hughes

At times, these processes may not have produced the most consumer- friendly protection protocols. There are some people who believe that encryption systems like CSS impinge upon "fair uses" under copyright law (I will say more about that shortly) .
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.806
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0020787647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010979184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003522498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001784148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001648828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.38063E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2717E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.2587E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.531E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.02E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Justin Hughes

But at least these are not digital locks regimes designed by bureaucrats and enforced by diktat. The message now from some voices in the copyright community is that if the computer, electronics, and telecommunications companies are not cooperative enough in crafting a new round of standard control technologies, then the federal government should step in and mandate which particular security technologies must be deployed. The intent of some of these controls would -- like streaming technology or CSS -- be to prevent digital copies from being made by individuals. But unlike those existing digital locks, the design of future digital locks would be regulated by the government.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0656597782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0358492718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.007955404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0067053421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031162483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003600709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003066098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.8833E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9623E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5057E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.448E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
34.849
Magnitude:
98
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Justin Hughes

I think that would be a troubling development. Congress should be cautious in how much it is willing to defer to the policy decisions -- and legislative drafting -- of private parties. A member of the House is reported to have said that the House Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property "has a history of preferring that commercial disputes be resolved between the parties rather than through the legislative process, which may favor one interest group over another." 1 -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0341186678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0063095482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0041952768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0031314234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017357463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001164001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009093786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005929847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002137175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.13802E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.21981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Justin Hughes

1 . . . Irina Y. Dmitrieva, I Know It When I See It.: Should Internet Providers Recognize Copyright Violations? 16 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ. 233, 246.(2000), citing NII Copyright Protection Act of 1995: Hearings on H.R. 2441 Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Intellectual Property of the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 104th Cong., at 20 (1995) -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0055080291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0026674788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011631676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007613437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000557366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003513192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001654462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.37261E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.85268E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.8615E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.152E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.5
Gunning-Fog Score
3.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

That's all good and well, but this risks being private resolution blessed by the legislative or regulatory process without any way to be sure that the private discussions took account of all the relevant social interests. How digital copyrighted works are distributed and used is a matter of enormous interest to consumers too. Users of copyrighted works have distinct privileges in the balanced scheme of the copyright law -- fair use and the first sale doctrine chief among them. An "agreement . . . brokered through private, voluntary, industry-led negotiations, and then blessed by Congress" may fail to address those concerns. 2 -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.984
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0432753557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0431107037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004609771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037267542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008157488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000349331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002381636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.00022604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.71336E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.92113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.60745E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.4
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37

Justin Hughes

2 Testimony of Peter Chernin, President and CEO, News Corp., before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, February 28, 2002, at 6. - II. The Importance of Fair Use Codified in 1976, but tracing its roots in American law back to at least the 1840s,3 17 U.S.C. Sec. 107 fair use is about as far from a bright line test as statutory law should wander. There is no question that what counts as "fair use" has changed over time. As reproductive technologies became more and more widely available to end users in the second half of the 20th century, fair use expanded to include a certain, undetermined amount of "non-transformative" copying for personal, non-commercial uses. On the only occasion when the Supreme Court considered non-transformative, private copying, it concluded in the Sony v. Universal Studios case 4 that at least one form of such copying -- "time-shifting" to watch a broadcast show at another time -- was protected activity. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.974
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0138781485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0055177392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041739473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037820158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0027764014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015765338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009952932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003683725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002049707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43612E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.32235E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
67.1
Magnitude:
15
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
52
Sprache Difficult Word Count
56

Justin Hughes

3 In Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F. Cas. 342 (No. 4,901) (CCD Mass. 1841), Justice Story summarized earlier copyright cases in a distillation of "fair use" which sustained the judge-made doctrine until its 1976 codification: "look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work." Id., at 348. There were considerably earlier cases in England permitting "fair abridgements" under the Statute of Anne, see W. Patry, The Fair Use Privilege in Copyright Law 6-17 (1985).
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.26868
VADER
0.934
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0591141288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0271897326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0177149559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0067505607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026886048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009163737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007915398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.59876E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2401E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.92E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
36.504
Magnitude:
100
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
35.457
Magnitude:
100
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37

Justin Hughes

4 Sony Corp. of America v Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984). -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0841872999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0238753069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0215826949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.019033745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017744675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014642091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011852393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.38022E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4939E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2652E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.872E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.4
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
1
SMOG Index
7.7
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Justin Hughes

Let me say a few things about that Sony "Betamax" decision that one rarely hears.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0741641503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0489350059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0453575747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0140259799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0123000689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018758401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015935739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001678047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8624E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.1414E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.0232E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
61.98
Magnitude:
79
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Justin Hughes

First, despite the clamor of some of academics, the right to make near perfect or perfect non-transformative copies of pop culture works is not at the core of our democratic freedoms. 5 It isn't even at the core of fair use. Some people forget that the Betamax decision was a 5-4 vote and the dissent thought that (near) perfect, non-transformative copying of audiovisual works was NOT fair use. That dissent included Justices Blackmun and Marshall -- surely two of the last century's most vigorous defenders of free speech and all the values that make a civil democratic society worth living in. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.974
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0037519836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023508996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022196255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014560311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012318622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008361711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008256818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005257917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001094258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.26117E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.42
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

5 There is no reason to think that the Betamax majority's analysis would be any different between a near-perfect analog copy [as at issue] and a "perfect" digital copy. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0055278138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027205142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011471743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009207853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008070128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001892754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001667586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001438469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001214939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.73122E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.8393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.2
Gunning-Fog Score
18.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Justin Hughes

But, second, it's been a long time since the Betamax decision. Twenty years. A lot has changed in that time -- lots of the factors which built the slim, five member majority have changed. Yet the studios have never challenged the Betamax conclusion that making non-transformative copies for "time-shifting" (a personal, noncommercial use in the home) is fair use. A whole generation of consumers is now accustomed to a certain amount of personal copying being a protected, legal activity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.786
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.048733587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0360642967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0117588294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019629992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012855077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007356937
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003530793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002906289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000175425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001405057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.68312E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
33.556
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
27.789
Magnitude:
66
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Justin Hughes

I think it's worth mentioning what is now an open secret. People at home make copies of TV programs for more than "timeshifting." People build up libraries of their favorite series, they copy children's programs to play again and again for the kids; they even sometimes share these recorded programs on their clunky videocassettes with neighbors and colleagues. 6 [And this is often genuine "sharing" as we are taught the concept as children, not Napsteresque "sharing" in which a person gives without giving up anything.] -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0810580445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0176302623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005759576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008111501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007509298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007437662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002171431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002087226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000121862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.40788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.1304E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Justin Hughes

6 Just last month, I got an all-faculty email requesting a copy of a PBS documentary. The email read, in part, "I'm urgently trying to locate a videotape copy of the PBS Frontline documentary `Inside the Jury Room'. Is there anyone in the Law School who happens to have a copy that they can loan out for a few days? I just discovered that my copy has gone missing . . . ." Admittedly, this was for an educational purpose, but it is exemplary of how people exchange, lend, and share recorded audiovisual works within small circles of family, friends, and colleagues. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.747
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.056901417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0352264644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0237782137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027216765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015610434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009838694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008429477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000341726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003002098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001362228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.90199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
46.399
Magnitude:
107
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Justin Hughes

That's important for one simple reason -- courts have identified customary practices as being relevant in determining what "markets" copyright holders are entitled to and, in turn, what kinds of copying may be fair uses. 7 Consumers have become accustomed to making some limited amount of non-transformative copies for personal use. This applies to all sorts of copyrighted works and across all sorts of machines and appliances. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.74721
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0342967629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.028879306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.011994932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020349053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001248947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011432818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000931139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.49123E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.60821E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8645E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4183E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Justin Hughes

7 See, e.g. Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States, 487 F.2d 1345, 1381, et seq., (Ct. Cl. 1973) (recognizing customary practices in determining fair use of photocopying), aff'd by equally divided Court, 420 U.S. 376, 43 L. Ed. 2d 264, 95 S. Ct. 1344 (1975); New Era Publications Int'l v. Carol Pub. Group, 904 F.2d. 152, 157 (2d Cir. 1990) (discussing reasonable and customary practices of biographers in determining fair use); Maxtone-Graham v. Burtchaell, 808 F.2d 1253, 1263 (2d Cir, 1986) (same); Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 307 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009, 17 L. Ed. 2d 546, 87 S. Ct. 714 (1967)) (same). See also Lloyd L. Weinreb, Fair's Fair: A Comment on the Fair Use Doctrine, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1137, 1140 (1990) -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.972
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1991186291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.144550018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0229438432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0228396035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0196175359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0073429408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005366085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.00034078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001602241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001106725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.09229E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
59.96
Magnitude:
89
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
1.7
SMOG Index
7.1
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
51
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43

Justin Hughes

Having said that fair use has evolved in the past, the corollary is that we don't know where fair use will go in the digital future. But if we don't know where fair use will go, we definitely should not allow anyone to unilaterally determine that fair use should go away. There have always been a few people who, in Professor Brown's 1963 description, "treat fair use as though it were some grudging toleration of an annoying public." 8 That's wrong. Fair use and other limitations on the rights of copyright owners -- like the first sale doctrine -- are part and parcel of the social bargain of copyright. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.843
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1122190501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0151899862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053470932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014664392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014235485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006367481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004597583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004464813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001167775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.42292E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0011E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

8 Copyright Law Revision, Part 3 Preliminary Draft for Revised U.S. Copyright Law and Discussions and Comments on the Draft 171 (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964). -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.8532502688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1015269081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0675749441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0285738235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0223380572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072271359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0009870639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005251072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003198302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002362685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000184734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
39.08
Magnitude:
98
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.2
Gunning-Fog Score
5.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Justin Hughes

The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) 9 reflects reasonable concern for "fair use" in the digital, networked era. Section 1201(c)(1) expressly provides that the new law does not affect fair use under section 107 and the prohibition on "digital lock picking" in section 1201(a) does not extend to digital locks that control any rights or privileges of the copyright holder beyond "access" -- precisely because some unauthorized uses will be fair uses. Only time will tell whether this arrangement in the DMCA workably preserves fair use, but the intent is clear. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.64706
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.64706
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.42139
VADER
0.782
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.010582379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0077716133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037685433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013241411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006983282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005297422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004511342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003138303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002625464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.66283E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.92937E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

9 Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 (October 28,1998). -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.368
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0373391376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0061259248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022094799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001822643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015204114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001493669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001350976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.65165E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.33864E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.11597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5341E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.603
Magnitude:
137
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
0
SMOG Index
5.8
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Justin Hughes

In that same spirit, the European Union has also recognized the importance of preserving "personal uses" and "fair dealing" limitations and exceptions from copyright liability under various European laws. The European Union's new Copyright Directive takes a slightly different tack from the DMCA, but with the same intent: under Article 6(4) of the Directive, if a member state of the European Union determines that digital locks deployed by copyright owners are inhibiting consumers ability to enjoy certain "personal uses" (what we would call fair uses), that country may take "appropriate measures" to ensure such uses are available to consumers. 10 -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.93827
VADER
0.952
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1566439052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1037643524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0223636307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0101783364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0046968195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022490169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011443703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000834908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006282445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.51368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.98925E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Justin Hughes

10 Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society., Chapter III, Article 6(4). -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0434140617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0287423783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0085584805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022727598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016195796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013018706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009531737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001383924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001017659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.96401E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4102E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.876
Magnitude:
122
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Justin Hughes

The smartest people in the audiovisual industry realize this too -- that a certain amount of non-commercial, personal copying definitely does not harm and may even benefit their businesses. III. Forcing Us To Define How Much Use Is Fair Use For this reason, if there has to be any regulatory structure imposed on digital, networked systems to protect copyrighted works, it should be one that focuses on stopping unauthorized distribution over the Internet and leaves alone what some people have called the "home net" -- the integrated system of personal computers, display devices, and audio equipment that private homes will increasingly have. 11 The focus should be on technology that addresses commercial and commerce-substituting broadband distribution, not on technology that could be used to stop Aunt Mary from copying her favorite soap opera for herself or a friend. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm
0.1007309998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0688330212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.058603019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0384776708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047346031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026007083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015470619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005426792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003821973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000179842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.46267E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.308
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
50

Justin Hughes

11 I think that Thomson Multimedia characterized this goal in similar terms, as "full functionality in a Personal Home Network" while gaining "protection of digital content from widespread piracy." Testimony of James E. Meyer, Senior Vice President, Thomson Multimedia, before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, February 28, 2002, at 2. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.422
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.061841245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0104851482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0046284218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0041309155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036971538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024287707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001359301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011631088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008193813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003032881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.23688E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Justin Hughes

More importantly, if the copyright industries want particular security technologies mandated by law, then instead of pursuing private, industry negotiations, we should all be prepared to sit down and do what we have not been willing to do in this country: establish exactly how much unauthorized, personal use is fair use. Perhaps additional security protocols like broadcast flags and watermarking might be legally mandated at least for some machines and appliances if the content community is willing to accept a limited, defined zone of personal, private, unauthorized use of copyrighted works. That would be a system in which we defined a minimum amount of copying a private individual would be allowed to do for herself, her family, and her immediate social circle.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.78947
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.78947
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.926
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0083267842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034679502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0019080326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003538293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0002355526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001995228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001208447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001138168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.56685E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3876E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1361E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
46.845
Magnitude:
64
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38

Justin Hughes

This could be a kind of Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA) 12 writ large -- covering more appliances and broadly extending its basic ideas, including the recognition that consumers can make some digital copies for personal uses. There is, of course, an important lesson in the AHRA: Congress legislated, but the market decided to go another direction and the statutory technological mandate was a technological dead-end. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.103
Leans Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0298387429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041135358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0025195512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00165111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013408436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004407783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004021771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002433462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002387717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.65978E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.24428E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.779
Magnitude:
68
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
20.656
Magnitude:
68
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Justin Hughes

12 17 U.S.C. Sec. 1001, et seq. - IV. A Sea Change From the DMCA Which brings me to a final, couple, broad concerns. While today's hearing is intended to be a general discussion of these issues, Senators Hollings and Stevens have recently proposed legislation on this topic, the Security Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA). We might as well talk about this, because we all know nothing focuses a lobbyist, legislator, or staffer's attention in DC like a draft bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.025049274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0208897036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083061481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031852513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026926768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001247333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.60651E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.44368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.7879E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2679E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.481E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Justin Hughes

In at least one version, the SSSCA would require the specification of "certified security technologies," either by an industry-only forum or by the Secretary of Commerce. In either case, the particular security technologies would be specified in law (regulation) and all "interactive digital devices" would be required to include such security technology -- all to the goal of preventing the making of digital copies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0131990615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0110550856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0102499835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022448643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009412608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004429603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002717361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001373355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.63822E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4291E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.179E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
36.285
Magnitude:
68
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
10.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

As best as I can tell, the SSSCA's sweeping definitions would require specified technology to be built into every piece of software; PC, video card, hard drive, CPU, motherboard; PDA; DVD or CD player; and every monitor manufactured or distributed in our country. 13 The security technology would be specified in a process that apparently has little or no safeguards for the traditional balance of copyright rights and privileges. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.84
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0833160884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0248302764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0236265972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0062851796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025719743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0017437465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015081267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000944072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002895729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.25345E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0273E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Justin Hughes

13 Although the definition of "interactive digital device" in the SSSCA would appear to sweep in electronic keyboards, wristwatches, airplane control systems, and new generations of toasters, microwaves, telephones, and vacuum cleaners, the intent may be more limited, i.e. that security standards would be "mandated for inclusion in all digital media devices that handle creative content." Testimony of Michael D. Eisner, Chairman and CEO, The Walt Disney Company, before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, February 28, 2002, at 3. Of course, that does not tell us whether it is devices intended to handle creative content or capable of handling creative content -- which will someday, if not already, include your wristwatch and maybe your toaster. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.45199
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.889
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0090776681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032118769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022244551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013810925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007909316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007099993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006531855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002279741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.11717E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.02738E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0027E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.26
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
53
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45

Justin Hughes

Moreover, the government's best intellectual property, information policy, and competition experts -- at the USPTO, the Copyright Office, the Justice Department, and the science agencies -- don't have a leading role in the "specification" process. It's hard to understand this. I think Congress ought to rely more on the expertise it pays for every year and less on the "experts" to be found at so many Washington fundraisers. 14 -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.889
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1287366846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.014891215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0068876936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0058764672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029842218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0028035929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021435339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011462097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005676704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001176293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.72313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
71.193
Magnitude:
131
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Justin Hughes

14 In fact, prior legislative efforts have consistently recognized that the quickly evolving nature of the Internet requires continued monitoring by experts and Congress has wisely chosen to defer decision or keep issues open by mandating studies in expert agencies. The DMCA includes a series of such studies by the Department of Commerce and the Copyright Office. The Hatch-Leahy distance education bill (S. 487) passed the Senate last year with a required report from the USPTO on the efficacy and effects of technological protection measures for copyrighted works in use or development. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0127420208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054404627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002881386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0026627109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012205438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006103434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004434574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001260409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001229577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.93994E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.03914E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35
Gunning-Fog Score
15.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45

Justin Hughes

But more importantly, the SSSCA or anything like it would represent a dramatic reversal of Congress' approach to the digital world. To date, Congress has wisely understood that the government should not try to pick technological "winners" and "losers." Government should stay out of the business of imposing technological solutions to problems which move much faster than bills through Congress or regulations through the Federal Register.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.633
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0156195936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0078896315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016674827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005062662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004995151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.59689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.34383E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.99876E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.21012E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5874E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2311E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
45.828
Magnitude:
80
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Justin Hughes

In that spirit, the DMCA wisely includes a "no mandates" provision, making clear that consumer electronics, computer, and telecommunications equipment systems do not have to be designed to respond to any particular technological measure. 15 The development of effective technological protection measures and their successful deployment was left up to the private sector. Congress' thoughtful effort to stop government from picking technological winners has extended far beyond intellectual property. For example, the E- Signatures bill, the work of the Judiciary and Commerce committees in both houses, is technologically neutral. It does not pre-empt states passing their own electronic signatures legislation, except that pursuant to section 102(a)(2)(A), the federal law does pre-empt any state government that tries to pick a particular technological solution to the problem of electronic signatures, documents, and recordkeeping. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.41176
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.41176
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.82098
VADER
0.953
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0273189798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0071102688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046216686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022981949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012182889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007219054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006963392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002183875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.40908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.22776E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8686E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.745
Magnitude:
95
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
58
Sprache Difficult Word Count
56

Justin Hughes

15 17 U.S.C. Sec. 1201(c)(3). The only technological mandate in the DMCA concerns deployment of "Macrovision" technology for a legacy technology -- analog video recordings. - V. How Would We Explain This Around the World? I have another concern about such a quick revisiting of the issue of technological protection measures -- just months after some of the key provisions of the DMCA have come online.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.003156994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028062868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017325117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004140565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001922833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001368345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.44988E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.77302E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.74998E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.49803E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.769E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
52.92
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
10.4
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Justin Hughes

Since the ratification of the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Phonograms and Performances Treaty (WPPT) in 1996, the United States has been at the forefront in advocating that countries ratify these international agreements and implement them through strengthening and improvement of domestic copyright legislation. Since the passage of the DMCA, the U.S. Government has held up the DMCA's balanced, hands- off approach as a model for how countries should implement international copyright norms for the digital, networked age.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.878
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0068019523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016239239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014205554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011634384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004306466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003182605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.60882E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.14238E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.03573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.4308E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.581E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
45.612
Magnitude:
113
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
20.366
Magnitude:
113
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

If we suddenly do a volte-face and decide that government must mandate the particular security devices and protocols needed to protect copyright works, it gets considerably harder to tell other countries that we know what we're doing. Frankly, such a policy change could make us look a little clueless. Having been in many of these conferences, discussions, and negotiations, I can easily imagine a savvy technocrat from another country noting such a change in U.S. policy and asking hard questions about American understanding of this Internet phenomenon, this digital universe of our own creation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.27297
VADER
0.706
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0062917214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045549343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031588461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025633528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017750717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003246252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.39619E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.8675E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.165E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.994E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.424E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Justin Hughes

In short, there may be international reasons for such a change in policy to be a last option. Conclusion There are tough decisions to be made in copyright policy. And those decisions may not be too far down the road. How the first sale doctrine survives in a digital world, how fair use evolves, how geography-based arrangements for royalties are transmuted into the Internet -- all these issues are as important as they are fascinating.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0246401469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0069092181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034851499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032251271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012387185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004689975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001715653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.50333E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.44715E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.54045E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.52797E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
59.968
Magnitude:
47
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Justin Hughes

Many of the people in this room remember the hearing on Napster and other peer-to-peer file sharing systems which this committee held in 2000. At that hearing, Chairman Hatch posed a couple hypotheticals to Hillary Rosen, head of the RIAA. Chairman Hatch asked, if he made a tape copy of a CD to play in his car, whether or not that would be a fair use. He then asked if he made a copy of a CD for his wife to play in her car -- would that be a fair use? Ms. Rosen demurred from giving a direct answer to Senator Hatch's questions and -- given her job -- I completely understand that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.912
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0473470776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.023749168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0070839611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0068063448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0032632361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016512373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012143393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007564158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000325618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.63495E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.55411E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Justin Hughes

But let me answer those questions, a couple years late. Are those fair uses? My very theoretical, law professor answer is this: if the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the ranking minority member think something is a fair use, it is probably a fair use or soon will be.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0260822271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0155250222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029345243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028458224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017332684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011509932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010648144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.29958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.56071E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.10433E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.0031E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
80.769
Magnitude:
16
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Justin Hughes

And I close there for a very simple reason -- whatever legislation is introduced in other quarters, whatever negotiations are conducted privately, this committee should not abdicate its traditional job in deciding the proper balance in copyright law of the interests of creators, distributors, consumers, and citizens.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0993299065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0081832659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0049602259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030365876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024708857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006284494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000252684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000237106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001831281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.1798E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.01773E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Justin Hughes

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.207992224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0188700462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047019061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002850682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011551278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008497762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002703873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002575838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001719027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.4115E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.716E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

No legislation will pass this year until we have had a chance to look at it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.052
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.135779893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0388915534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0299325126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0219487862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0176139321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0083142477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006828474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002633064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.74142E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.60355E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.01703E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
88.379
Magnitude:
50
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

I promised the Senator from California, who is trying to juggle two different matters, that I would let her go first for questioning. Then, unless the ranking member has come back, we will go to Senator Specter.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0805974996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0105098232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0081617953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047651418
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030823681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012038568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009537238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.6486E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2786E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.215E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Dianne Feinstein

Thanks very much, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate that. I would like to just make a couple of informal comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0078207479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049238661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047166723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012558348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000895234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001449699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000124252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.44421E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.70572E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.21188E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0194E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
36.717
Magnitude:
117
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.266
Magnitude:
117
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Dianne Feinstein

This is an issue which impacts California dramatically. We have a large IT industry. Mr. Barrett spoke on behalf of the computer industry. We have a very large entertainment industry. We have a very large biotech industry, pharmaceutical industry, all of which are really based on copyright and patent protection.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.473
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0139383585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0103237391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.008633393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0033737739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023372455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007832969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006464985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005749769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003333055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000237253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002074786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
44.741
Magnitude:
67
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Dianne Feinstein

That is really where this country, as I see it, has made its mark in the world. We have been on the innovative edge of new discoveries constantly, and these new discoveries have been protected by both copyrights and patents.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.7
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0308457733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.016616263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031517477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009062601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002703798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001887195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001756975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001422974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.69031E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.15402E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.26119E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
62.073
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Dianne Feinstein

In the 10 years I have been on this committee, I see this as perhaps the most serious infringement on copyright protection that I have seen and I want to just very briefly explain why, because unless something is done cooperatively and inclusively of all of the industries involved, I think we are going to be forced to simply watch the massive theft of copyrighted works of all kinds all around the world until the thrust to really create disappears. I think it is that serious a situation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.805
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0209050864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0097835124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0052180167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028626058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003536818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000305011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.91687E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.00869E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.48361E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.447E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.4279E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
45.325
Magnitude:
50
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Dianne Feinstein

Over the past weekend, my chief counsel went online to verify the statements made to us about how easy it is to get copyright material on the Internet, and he did verify it. This is a ten-cent CD-ROM containing a full-length version of the movie "Shrek," downloaded using the file-sharing program Morpheus. "Shrek" was just released on DVD last November. It is running on HBO right now. It quickly became the best-selling DVD of all time, but apparently someone on the Internet was able to defeat the copy protection on the DVD and put the movie online because my staff was able to download a perfect copy of "Shrek" for free in just a few short hours.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.815
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0089366462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054385644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050515449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010213706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009890766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009795348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.1981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.68248E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6503E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3282E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.152E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
41.013
Magnitude:
80
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
30.842
Magnitude:
80
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Dianne Feinstein

As an example that is even more problematic, my staff was even able to download a full-length copy of "A Beautiful Mind." This is a movie up to Best Picture of the Year. It is still in theaters. It is not even out on video yet, but he was able to get it for free and download it in two-and-a-half hours using the file-sharing program G Nucleus.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.814
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0162065742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0125791543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0097392236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0077771962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0070997528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019372736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006147926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003470876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.73497E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.35187E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Dianne Feinstein

So as I see it, Mr. Chairman, this is Napster times ten because nobody can shut these services down. The software operates in a decentralized way and the content resides and passes not through one central server, but everywhere on the Internet. These file-sharing services have already had an impact on the music industry, allowing by some accounts the illegal download of billions of music files every month, and widespread movie piracy is just around the corner.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.71
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0587179966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0472927932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0060453516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0056213848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036303976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0030568855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021533191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004592649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003634259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002948596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002056421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.711
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Dianne Feinstein

Now, that is the bad news. The good news is this: I have had a chance to talk to two people. One of them has Mr. Valenti, who has indicated his industry's concern. The other is yesterday Mr. Barrett was nice enough to come in and share his industry's concern.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0080240432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0059696911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016170501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014788063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005538381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003197344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002956266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.93143E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.60567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.718E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0184E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
58.731
Magnitude:
73
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
21.211
Magnitude:
73
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85
Gunning-Fog Score
7.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
8.5
Automated Readability Index
1.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Dianne Feinstein

The good news here is that both parties, as I see it, are willing to sit down and try to work out some protection measure, which I think can certainly be done technologically, to protect copyright. I think this is extraordinarily important because I think it is really related to the creative strength of this Nation. And if the creative strength of the Nation can't be protected by legal tools developed just for that purpose, then really where are we?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.97
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0078218363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028392789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006993912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002107274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.30659E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.72947E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3307E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.8013E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4872E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4785E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.164E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.276
Magnitude:
96
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Dianne Feinstein

So I want to ask my first question, if I might, to Mr. Barrett. Mr. Barrett, how much time do you think it will take, assuming parties are well-meaning and assuming you can sit down at a table and you can work something out?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.505
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2751111519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1716097468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0754345965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0206984361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0097611926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0089426219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0036057827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003718066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.49113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.9623E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.99471E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.085
Magnitude:
3
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.3
Gunning-Fog Score
7.2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Craig Barrett

Well, Senator, over the last six years a number of solutions have been worked out, as I think you know, in terms of DVDs and audio and pre-recorded content. We are coming up with solutions for digital TV terrestrial broadcasts, the analog hole.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0068640104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036854814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033174245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007055627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003046101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.17144E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.33192E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.921E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.6136E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.119E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.318E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.29
Magnitude:
12
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Craig Barrett

The peer-to-peer issue is a difficult issue. I think there is no silver bullet. I think there will be a combination solution which includes most probably legal solutions such as shutting down unauthorized distributors, technical solutions such as watermarks protecting at the source, business solutions such as offering content through business operations, such as Intertainer and others, at reasonable prices that consumers are willing to pay, and most probably some targeted legislative solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.472
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0254598534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028066426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020737691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015713042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006808368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002640135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.8133E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.5503E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.37E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.45E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.16E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
59.315
Magnitude:
16
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Craig Barrett

The difficulty, as I explained to you when we met privately, is, in fact, that once "in the free" digital content is on the Net, it is very difficult to differentiate it from legal content on the Net; that is, to differentiate between a home video and "Lord of the Rings" in terms of streaming bit count is very, very difficult. That is the problem that needs to be solved and that is why there is no silver bullet. That is why I think it will be a combination of legal, business, technology and legislative solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.1431
VADER
-0.613
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0137261944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0122812344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0090594469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027689897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022891436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015096692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010490653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000269401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.07908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.89686E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.04714E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.165
Magnitude:
55
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51
Gunning-Fog Score
17.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Dianne Feinstein

Streaming bit count?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0003234768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001739579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001272482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
4.8987E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
4.86445E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.0074E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.8803E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.4568E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.2927E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.71E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.855E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.531
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Craig Barrett

Well, streaming bits; that is what the Internet is, ones and zeroes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.009414446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040571471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014727179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012556827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003088475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.59661E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.74499E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.36825E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.3799E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7905E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1044E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
64.302
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.9
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Dianne Feinstein

So what you are saying is there is a partial solution, but not an entire solution?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.02
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.006076974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028405273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024235025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019664316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003761105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001217142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.5728E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.46235E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.62323E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8459E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4624E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Craig Barrett

Well, there is no solution today -- first of all, I believe there has been no solution suggested by the content industry. If it had, it would have come to the Content Protection Technical Working Group. No proposed solution has come from that body. We would certainly be willing to look at a proposed solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.04452
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0054941484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045176879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037478749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009507081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005060991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000219983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001599398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.10414E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.08719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.7576E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6039E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Craig Barrett

The solutions that have been made in public but not taken to the Technical Working Group involve such things as monitoring all Internet content flow. In my opinion, that is the analogy to wiretapping all Internet communications. Especially in front of this committee, I don't think that it would find much approval, and certainly amongst the privacy constituents I think it would not find much approval.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.77
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
1.0485680774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0158604002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0144801481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0048202935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032327636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018966757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0012122497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009970106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002945864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.11462E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.40339E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Craig Barrett

The other one is the situation that I mentioned earlier, which is to compare all bit streaming, assuming you ignore the privacy aspect, with a database of all copyrighted content, basically having a fingerprint of all copyrighted content and looking at every Internet message to see if it contains that fingerprint. I don't even know how to do that technically, let alone overcome the privacy issues.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0152633933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0055939363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043474814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017634782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015467949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005785444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005472783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004852103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004277617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003372372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.71688E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Jonathan Taplin

Senator Feinstein, if I could just --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.034895257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0344074884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0296986225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0161367832
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0143998186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0042102904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008914071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000429801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003777301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003167097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001659589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.8
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Dianne Feinstein

My time is up.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0152717213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0128624873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.010639985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0049746501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021496568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005184242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002989493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.89138E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.66853E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.43201E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.517E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
42.844
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
0
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

Go ahead.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0378484168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0069738635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065734501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036261554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017538465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008250844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000765403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000225845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.67139E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.4573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.27523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.695
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Jonathan Taplin

Can I just address the one issue about "A Beautiful Mind?"
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0500901777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002040459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020208226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017664155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012040727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005998155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003055642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002506569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001799145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001425733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8216E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
65.574
Magnitude:
38
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.6
Gunning-Fog Score
4.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Dianne Feinstein

Yes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0212193452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0190948398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0131850742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038862192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034727058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027679254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0013659402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002889842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001412443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.16652E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8416E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.36
Magnitude:
71
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Jonathan Taplin

Obviously, since that is a movie that has not been put on a DVD, so it is not commercially available, the only way that movie could have gotten in such a perfect form on the Internet is that someone stole it from a post-production house, which means that the movie studios themselves are being sloppy with their own protection of their content in the post- production process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1606709324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1169218449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0489420258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0448737585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.029971177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.017747737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0078990197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0037331996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008213897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004046527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003335309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
31.775
Magnitude:
46
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Jonathan Taplin

It means that someone took an output from a digital editing station or something like that, some assistant editor, and took it home and put it on the Internet. That is not an issue that any of these things that are being talked about would address. That is someone who stole a perfect digital copy from inside the movie studio and got it out there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0318608276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0108696579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0049744838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036483616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024091603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014912589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009777112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008854348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004325841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.26667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
93.818
Magnitude:
21
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Dianne Feinstein

But then that is another problem because I think the movie companies can certainly protect themselves. On the other hand, the incentive then grows to steal this and to put it out on the Internet to make money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Hate
0.0224138392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.011181632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.010706771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002941773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027284908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022466054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003526314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002724931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57903E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0736E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.8356E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.29
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Jonathan Taplin

If we had access to very larger libraries of content and could sell them for a reasonable price, which we are doing, I think the general consumer does not want to go to an illegally pirated site. And if you think about a combination of allowing much more content to come out legally with digital rights management technologies, we have been running for three years and have never been hacked, ever.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.205
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0016371958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014352292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006964096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000566444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003798647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003307101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001478127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.58575E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.82811E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.3008E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.34E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

If you put them out, the average consumer doesn't want to be a pirate, and then perhaps a little consumer education -- i.e., Don Henley or a few artists saying, hey, you are stealing my work if you are going to KazAA -- might help.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.27
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0223381838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0164219266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.008374155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041255611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014809542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003839885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001838976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.02733E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.3244E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.93E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.981E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.7
Gunning-Fog Score
9.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
4.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Dianne Feinstein

I hope you are right about the average consumer. I am not so sure, though. But in any event, thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.6096673906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2598098246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1981028821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052953947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019342109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013562117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001094106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.92242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.09089E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3767E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.286E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.9
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Craig Barrett

My point was very much that it is a combination of a business solution, technology solution, and legal solution. I think all of those things have to work in tandem to protect the free content that makes its way to the Internet, whether it makes it from copying off a DVD or it makes it being stolen from a studio.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2427718835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1353881904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0436706585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030786196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012342987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002631127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001959475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.62833E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.164E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7526E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0691E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Dianne Feinstein

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Barrett. I appreciate the opportunity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0955763739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0346528017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0038793729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024855552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012498585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010582474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009464555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003331472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001142808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.18809E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4739E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.3
Gunning-Fog Score
7.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
6.9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Patrick Leahy

I thank the Senator from California. I know about the conflict she had today and I appreciate the amount of time she spent here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1098291483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0251554215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.011130685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0093295086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016091062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001303405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001999167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001149524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.33637E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.13531E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7448E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.636
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.2
Gunning-Fog Score
6.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Patrick Leahy

I turn to the senior Senator from Pennsylvania.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.112142053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.106331741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0299742329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0069024813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0066339933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0032052463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014351566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002386269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001870308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001350975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001066397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.626
Magnitude:
102
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
5.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

STATEMENT OF HON. ARLEN SPECTER, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.123081659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0885041722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0336452038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083188082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0078347439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028268183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0027387752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007377756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001122525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.67664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.307E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
35.708
Magnitude:
30
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.9
Gunning-Fog Score
4.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
6.1
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Arlen Specter

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0787686557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0334171549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0238690278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0089035231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000207496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002022235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001284543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001107901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.01883E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.5192E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.653E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.344
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Arlen Specter

There is no doubt that we ought to do everything we can to protect intellectual property rights. When Mr. Barrett testifies that high-tech is losing $12 billion a year, the thought crosses my mind what can be done to protect high-tech's copyrights. And when we talk about $2.5 billion in losses for content from entertainment, that is a staggering figure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2236825647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0318875973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0073666401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052995521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003060059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016924916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010391112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007546269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.58926E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.94543E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0077E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.254
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Arlen Specter

In reviewing the issues before this hearing, I am somewhat at a loss to figure out what this committee can do to make a constructive contribution. The legislation which is being circulated would require computer and consumer electronics manufacturers to embed copyright protection technology in all digital devices, from computers to compact disc players to video players. But the problem that I have is what does technology offer to meet that standard. As I review the literature, there are some technological devices, but as Mr. Barrett points out, if it is on the Internet there is nothing that has yet been devised.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
-0.332
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0738324772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0223918149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0083039784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0054000269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020842197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018357347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003375542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.83601E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.83974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.61523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.1306E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
54.727
Magnitude:
46
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
21.104
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Arlen Specter

So what is the point, starting with you, Mr. Barrett, for Congress to get into this thicket and to require technology to solve a problem when the technology doesn't exist?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
-0.226
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0051902847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045822337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011301983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000606123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003329496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002351127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.86727E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.86527E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.83971E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.7968E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5789E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
73.588
Magnitude:
53
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Craig Barrett

Well, I have a similar problem with that proposal that you read. I think that was from Senator Hollings' bill, or proposed bill. I don't think the technology exists to differentiate between lawful content, legally-produced home video, audio, what have you, and pirated content; that is, content which is not protected at the source such as we were just talking about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
-0.286
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.003259709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020844564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011640566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001004743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.45646E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.43754E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.9283E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.3726E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8432E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4456E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.691E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
44.377
Magnitude:
28
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Craig Barrett

To differentiate between those on the Internet, you either have to outlaw legal content such that you could try to track down all content and do something with it, or you have to do the fingerprint analogy that I was mentioning. You would have to monitor all Internet communications and, on the fly, try to match content to see if it is copyrighted and unprotected and should not be allowed to pass.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1999315107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.035735761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0151141343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0058450965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0030291227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023902279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020171472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005388665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001206417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.83601E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.84641E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
32.541
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
25.347
Magnitude:
59
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Arlen Specter

Well, this hearing brings to my mind a hearing we had about 20 years ago on VCRs. I reminisced with Senator Biden. When he chaired the committee -- I think it was about 1982 -- we were worried about what we were going to do there. We were going to have VCRs which didn't pick up the commercials and there were all sorts of concerns.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1946302247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0471297244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0334011012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.032469671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0033872526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028423077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019777612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.45772E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.82787E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9173E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.864
Magnitude:
47
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Arlen Specter

I want to direct this question to you, Mr. Kraus, representing consumers here. As concerned as we are with intellectual property rights in the movie industry and high- tech, we are perhaps even more concerned with the consumers. There are certainly more voters among the consumers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9781395569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7100218683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4066372067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9470939636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9110790677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6569254678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2249140525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1443920308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1300290925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0911959214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0490104663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.651
Magnitude:
61
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Arlen Specter

If we can develop technology which would meet this standard to have computer and consumer electronics manufacturers embed copyright protection technology in all digital devices, is it within the realm of technical possibility to have the technology such that it accomplishes that but allows consumers to use it for their own private purposes?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.214
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0206581753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0159378076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0132177898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0058814345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018244933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016909171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003482178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.53973E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.5001E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.0591E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.4235E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.347
Magnitude:
48
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

That is a good question. I don't know the answer directly because I am not familiar with the entire spate of technological solutions that are all being proposed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3162062727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1239653095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0239472589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0137206589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0089327608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0023602466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006727092
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000377652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002729606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001758853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4195E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.419
Magnitude:
48
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Joe Kraus

What I would advocate generally, though, is that we need to clearly define a set of consumer rights and then let the market adjudicate and decide what solutions best respect consumers' rights and copyright-holders' rights. Currently, consumers' rights aren't well enough defined to allow, I believe, the market to work successfully to develop technologies which respect both parties' rights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.965
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0049892871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042550011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0035877412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012985019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006800646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003936093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000164499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001554169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.96287E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.1985E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6968E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
48.002
Magnitude:
74
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

So that is what I happen to believe is an appropriate solution, is adequately defining consumers' rights. We already have adequate definitions of what the content owners' rights are. With those two rights in place, I believe the market will find technological solutions that can respect them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.13549
VADER
0.791
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2162748715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0606976682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0496072113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0418824813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028113252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007214574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006282727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.86785E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.47242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.6604E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.408E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
45.865
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Joe Kraus

I wanted to also touch on the notion that the software industry has seen this movie before. As you have reflected on the VCR, you have seen this movie before. The software industry has been dealing with piracy for a very long period of time. As Mr. Barrett pointed out, $12.5 billion is lost to piracy per year in the software industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0263729919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0255992025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.019892292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0088525747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028161821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008146674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000291843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.17938E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.03974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.68305E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.65282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Joe Kraus

In the mid-1980s, the software industry decided to impose strict copy controls on most software packages. What happened? It isolated and alienated paying customers. It didn't stop piracy. It actually made the paying customers more angry, and I would say we are currently seeing that movie again.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.20067
VADER
-0.773
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0089734342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040455416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009126888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001112037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.8724E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.76953E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
5.52434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.2871E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.617E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.3176E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.695E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Joe Kraus

We are implementing copy protection controls on consumer media, for which I understand the motivation, but in the end we are alienating the actual customers who then pay for that media and not actually having the impact on piracy that I think we would all like to see.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.519
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0069045018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0031130374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023494293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0022500082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001463211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006550824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006282091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002646232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001274101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.85983E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.8909E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
15.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Arlen Specter

Let me come back to the legislation which is currently being circulated. I would be glad to get behind any legislation which would protect intellectual property rights. I am all for it, but the proposal to have the Secretary of Commerce come in, if there cannot be agreement among the parties to these kinds of controversies, really raises a question in my mind. Very frequently, the Congress does its best when it does nothing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.54654
VADER
0.924
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0078694873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032105909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014217914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013783492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003039509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.34552E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.81303E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4305E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.8738E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1271E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.064E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
47.344
Magnitude:
19
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Arlen Specter

Are we better off if we let the market work through and let the market seek the technological devices? If the market comes up with them, then there may be some inclination on the part of the parties themselves to resolve it. Very frequently, when we get into it, we cause more problems than we solve.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.722
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0117051422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0098655699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004522594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004219722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.3717E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.22841E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.44174E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.3883E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.7624E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5225E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.111E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
96.41
Magnitude:
35
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Arlen Specter

Mr. Parsons, you have had a chance to catch your breath. What do you think?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1068089507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0067810462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065981258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008082529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007991802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007488429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002961765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001132463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.487E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.41459E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.3053E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
90.163
Magnitude:
19
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Richard Parsons

Well, Senator, first of all let me start as I frequently find myself with my wife having to start, with an apology, and that is for being late to this hearing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0126089362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098647601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00048163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003656428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002849172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001888122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001612984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.82451E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.33352E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.5133E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.534E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Arlen Specter

Mr. Parsons, we understand you came by air. If you had been on Amtrak, you would have been here on time.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0628815789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0377764838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.033879574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.004374655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007685475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006537089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005723143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.96443E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6586E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3564E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2628E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
91.924
Magnitude:
113
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99
Gunning-Fog Score
4.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Richard Parsons

If I had walked, I would have been here closer to the time than coming by air this morning.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0451439264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0391674053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0136175717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0085635991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0045873447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040833474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016358474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007113602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001040102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.9349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.303E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
77.447
Magnitude:
87
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

I would tell the Senator from Pennsylvania and the Senator from Delaware, who are both strong supporters, as they should be, of Amtrak, that I had already put in a plug for Amtrak even earlier.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0193527885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0168692466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.014747915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0118791933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.003156723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011078429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009776543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001332053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.37047E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.5877E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.41E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
88.532
Magnitude:
34
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Arlen Specter

We may have some problems with the Hollings bill, but we have no problem with funding Amtrak, Mr. Parsons. [Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
-0.802
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.2481236588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2248232253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1541223726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0455341069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0358937948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028167515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015460768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010137084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.24589E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.98368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.50725E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
70.946
Magnitude:
30
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.9
Gunning-Fog Score
3.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Richard Parsons

I think the proper response is message received.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.006384655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0059179642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0055858658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029605446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018807552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006491223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.91197E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.82268E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.37444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.35095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.9881E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
49.359
Magnitude:
62
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Richard Parsons

I think, Senator, that the question you are raising about whether there is a helpful and useful role for the Congress here is the right one. Our view -- and if I am going to be permitted in a minute to give my statement, I will expand on this a bit, but our view is that this is primarily an area that should be worked out in the marketplace; that the entertainment industry, the information technology industry, the consumer electronics industry and the software industry have got to get our act together and we have got to work hard to deal with these problems because it requires that degree of suppleness and flexibility.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
0.731
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0032985597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009553861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005788595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002985932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001345381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.71681E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.80171E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.97375E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.53603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.8359E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.3727E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Richard Parsons

There are, we believe, a few areas where discreet, incisive help from the Government in the form of taking -- we can take the ball to the five-yard line in some instances, and I will explain a little bit more of that in a minute, and to get it over the goal line we may need some help from the Government. But I don't think that this is a situation where government action should try, with a sword as opposed to a scalpel, to administer the surgery.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.7137883455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1069929218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0202794487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0081903861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036257923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0010400234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000388466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001532562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.43393E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.5049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.4262E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Richard Parsons

I think we have work to do. We are doing a lot of work right now on a cross-industry basis, but there are a few discreet areas where some governmental assistance could prove helpful.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0048738006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011559676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009322702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0005057894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004283451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003934066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003024732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001490963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001452204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.85482E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.4694E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Arlen Specter

Well, thank you, Mr. Parsons. We are ready, willing and able to help out, but I think we have to know what the technology is if we are to legislate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0017290191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015966039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014797599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004820321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001443197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.62581E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.75204E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.40296E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.72248E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.0386E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6966E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
1.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Arlen Specter

I would like to come back later, Mr. Barrett, to this issue of the $12 billion which high-tech is losing. That is an intolerable situation. We want to protect your property interests so that you can continue to produce, and I think that if we can find the technology Mr. Kraus suggests we may be able to protect the consumer interests as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0138236952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053746888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0050470717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026005053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0021385376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005235087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003598893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.55762E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.06788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.43501E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.37974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Arlen Specter

Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.646
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0167523132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0143267796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0069564951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0055767432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0052330859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004875313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002547086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.47618E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.95387E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.4671E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8064E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
98.4
Gunning-Fog Score
1.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.05450194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0275522005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0093911338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0073240662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010967778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005586612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004114047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001560288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.31969E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.7287E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7674E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

I know Senator Biden wants to leave. Do you want to say something?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual > Minors
0.0060798317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0046386816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043606062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.003773535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008952434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005773913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0005583081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000123048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.68347E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.19936E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.541E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.234
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.1
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Joe Biden

Sixty seconds.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0528533303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.016408466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0123806618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0111386813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0060528793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001502932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012370162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008272368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006885595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003125921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.35278E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
88.707
Magnitude:
78
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Patrick Leahy

Sure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0241302274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0129836058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0129583248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074375079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003844441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001291975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011332429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008614509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006477741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003530698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.18901E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
96.369
Magnitude:
117
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

STATEMENT OF HON. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.406455528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1615390531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.030502741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0257286418
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0127892155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017968827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002107196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002068541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002018035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.38134E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.65069E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
87.5
Gunning-Fog Score
3.9
Coleman-Liau Index
4.5
SMOG Index
5.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Joe Biden

I want to explain that I promised the National Conference of Mayors I would meet with them at 11:30, and I will try to come back and I would ask that my questions be submitted to the panel if I am not back and just state that it seems to me there is a philosophical divide here. I want to make sure I understand it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0470702566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0140162869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.012474136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043686643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018205099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004293708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003301271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002513547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001978291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001553474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.46359E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Joe Biden

It is one thing for us to be in a position where we make a distinction between what is inappropriately and illegally copied and what is legally and appropriately copied. That is a heck of a dilemma, but also in the case that we were faced with in the bad old days when I was chairman it was about whether or not we were going to force the consumer to have to listen to something, force them to listen to ads.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.71
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.1091458718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.086884317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0247174175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0091324458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.007431319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0043965869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.004351998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.78349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.39687E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.81138E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.15755E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Joe Biden

This is about balancing equities here, consumers versus what is obviously an aggrieved party here. Whose responsibility it is remains to be seen, but I suspect -- just so you know, we do have laws. If you all in the software industry and the computer industry were to manufacture those little wands and you could go up to the Texaco station and illegally get gas out at two o'clock in the morning, we would arrest you for that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.619
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0300587679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0176951362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0059740141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039123192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021447791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017739294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001679075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.08407E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.5127E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.39516E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.66309E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Biden

If you were making keys that I brought in to you to get into other people's homes, we would arrest you for that. If you were taking little clickers into garages and me getting a hold of one and asking you to produce one with the same frequency, knowing it wasn't my garage, we would arrest you for that. We should think of arresting you maybe for some of the things you don't do, but that is a much larger question here and there is a balancing of equities here, unlike before. But I have an open mind on the Hollings bill and I will try to come back and hear what you all have to say.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.34
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0508779078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0378143013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0295474427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.009178972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016335713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013737483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012627896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.84647E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.22043E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.5855E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0846E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.2
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Biden

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I know you have questions. By the time you finish, maybe I will be able to get back. Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)