Skip to content
RollCall logo
Fact
ba
.
se
Powered by FiscalNote StressLens
Joe Biden
Transcripts White House Calendar White House Press Releases

S. Hrg. 107-905 - Competition, Innovation, and Public Policy in the Digital Age: Is the Marketplace Working to...

Topics
Entities
Moderation
Speakers
Topics
No topics found
Entities
No entities found
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Full Transcript

Patrick Leahy

I appreciate you all being here. I just checked with Senator Hatch. He is delayed at another meeting and so we are beginning.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1295691589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0585563423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0181112846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0073452451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038293878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004581437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004259648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000414612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000161355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001085117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.20077E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Patrick Leahy

This is not a paid promotion for Amtrak, but Mr. Parsons is not here because he has been spending several hours trying to fly down from New York. Of course, he could have been here a couple of hours ago if he had taken the train on a foggy morning. That is just a personal thing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0182524222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0105517676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015675132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001030439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000383357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002857035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002758072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.00294E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.7157E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.1193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.061E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.4
Gunning-Fog Score
7.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Patrick Leahy

When I first arrived in the Senate, television broadcasts were no longer just in black and white. Record players had high fidelity and the excitement of stereophonic sound. The personal computer, e-mail, high-definition television, CDs, DVDs, wireless communications devices and the Internet were yet to be released and now they are among our most ubiquitous tools. We talk to our friends, we use in our work, we keep in touch with our families, we listen to music, we watch a movie, we play a video game, and all of it is almost like second nature.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.94444
VADER
0.829
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2907739719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0438934861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0315118581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0024560642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002351765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014948271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006338394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002450359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002236826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.04128E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.17441E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
88.041
Magnitude:
56
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Patrick Leahy

Each new tool has spawned new opportunities, entirely new industries, new ways to package and sell products, and new ways for consumers to enjoy copyrighted works. It is no surprise that the intellectual property generated in this country is an economic engine that is the envy of the world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0250213954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0227898767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0188174556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0065305518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0062723593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015164393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000513847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001489949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001282951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.28756E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2359E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.165
Magnitude:
95
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Patrick Leahy

I would note that in the New York Times this morning Amy Harmon has an excellent article which actually covers much of what we are talking about -- "Piracy or Innovation: Hollywood Versus High-Tech," with a picture of Stephen Jobs and Michael Eisner on it. I am going to put that in the record because it so well spells out and encapsulates some of the debate going on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0144699196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0087678156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040449893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014289088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012520093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010036294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006117263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004375593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.66655E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.49958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.0998E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
44.277
Magnitude:
49
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

There have been hearings recently in the Commerce Committee. I agreed with some of the things that the movie industry, Mr. Eisner and Mr. Valenti said, and I agreed with some of the things that the high-tech industry said. But I had significant disagreement with some of the things that Mr. Eisner and Mr. Valenti and some of the high-tech people said.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0186850608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0078036501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041945128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012476814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010616569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006805953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002071522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.8911E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.6561E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9933E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.093E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
33.776
Magnitude:
68
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
3.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Patrick Leahy

I mention this because it points up the differences of opinion in both the members of the Senate and within the various industries. As the article by Ms. Harmon points out, there are these differences. I say this because until the differences are resolved, certainly no legislation will pass this year. I hope everybody will understand that. Those who have to advise their clients, you can advise them without a lot more consensus. No legislation will pass this year.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.148
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.029757095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0196142631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0036358408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036135349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022780652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007926486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001926146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001406168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.76956E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.58434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.93025E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
90.97
Magnitude:
62
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

The entertainment industry certainly has not fully made their case, but the high-tech industry hasn't either. And if you have a case where the cases haven't been made definitively, then I don't think the Congress can act.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0056690064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038830109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019837775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014370576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010571308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009250699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000154808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001112101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.3826E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.5788E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7244E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
81.683
Magnitude:
79
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Patrick Leahy

The challenge of protecting music and motion pictures and sound recordings and computer software and other copyrighted works in digital formats has been the focus of the Judiciary Committee's sustained attention over the past few years. I have worked in close partnership with Senator Hatch and other members of this committee to keep our copyright laws up to date.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0150364387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047430407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0024492645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006259504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003111689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002060298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001684057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001674848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001292796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001141996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.79886E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
35.479
Magnitude:
37
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

We want to protect the rights of creators. We also want to ensure that consumers enjoy a vast selection of new and different educational, entertainment, and other copyrighted products. We also appreciate, having focused on these issues for so long, that new technological developments pose new challenges about how to protect copyright works and create new business models to deliver those products to customers securely, and so forth.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.97
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0091145062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0044247423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001672667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015864049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000723154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003658947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002832726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.67286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.68453E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7728E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1996E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
41.192
Magnitude:
59
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
31.858
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Patrick Leahy

New technologies often initially at least appear to trump intellectual property protection, but we have also found in the end they many, many times open new opportunities for artists, new choices for consumers, and often business models have to change accordingly. Protecting intellectual property, which has been within the jurisdiction of this committee since establishment in 1816, under another Vermonter as chairman, involves far more than arcane legal issues and requires a careful balance among the rights and interests of consumers, creators and innovators.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.939
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0100388192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0032620879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017226545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011404592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009542833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008219555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003632437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.45826E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.31673E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.17056E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7805E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
38.492
Magnitude:
68
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
26.22
Magnitude:
68
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
7.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Patrick Leahy

We were well aware of these new challenges in 1998 when Senator Hatch and I worked closely together on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the DMCA, to advance the goals of protecting digital copyrighted works and promoting the development of innovative technologies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0010491443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006307226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005543624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001895826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.37072E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.29021E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.41045E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3351E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.8047E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.776E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.8E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
41.013
Magnitude:
83
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
24.824
Magnitude:
83
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Patrick Leahy

At the time, this new law was praised by Jack Valenti, of the Motion Picture Association of America. Mr. Valenti is one of the most respected voices up here on Capitol Hill and he said that "offering intellectual property the full weaponry of the law to protect voyages in cyberspace from thieves who have previously determined that stealing creative works is very rewarding and very low risk."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.831
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0295626058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009364073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0027477143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0026402146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008478496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.84983E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.88591E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.51273E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.0354E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2658E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.204E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.932
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

A core provision of the DMCA barred the unauthorized circumvention of technological measures used effectively by content owners to prevent unauthorized access to copyrighted works. It left to the private sector the important decisions of what technological protection measures to develop and use to protect digital works or whether to use any protection measure at all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.751
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.008086185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002532806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006989485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000556315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000147603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001111848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.30324E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8229E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.3983E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.463E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.13E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
44.337
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

Technology has been the bane of content owners who are rightfully dismayed at the rampant online piracy of valuable works. I can't overemphasize how concerned all of us are here to think of people with copyrighted works that are stolen. But technology has also been pivotal to their protection. Since passage of the DMCA, great progress has been made to develop technical tools to protect and manage digital rights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.758
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.017620466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0093540868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033197732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010927291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010235625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008161667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.05997E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.90985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.7739E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7006E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.108E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
67.157
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Patrick Leahy

Multi-industry groups involving technology companies, consumer electronics companies, move studios and other content owners have developed technologies to protect digital content delivered to consumers on DVD and CD, over satellite, cable and broadband systems, and over the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0069150192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020322057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002607518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.14047E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
3.22053E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.8093E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.61422E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3172E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.009E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.99E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.995
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

Content owners are using these new digital rights management tools to develop and experiment with new business models for delivery of content to consumers. In the past few months, new sites like Pressplay and Musicnet have offered legitimate sources for Internet users and music lovers to access music online, protected by digital rights management technology that has been chosen and suits the needs of the owners. Today, we are going to see Mr. Taplin's Web site for consumers to enjoy video on demand, also protected by digital rights management tools that fit his business model and protect the movies from unauthorized copying.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0413633388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0129046864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029297144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004427686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001768982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001141847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.11855E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.7249E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.3129E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.701E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.46E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.16
Magnitude:
38
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37

Patrick Leahy

But it is not a perfect world, and three significant gaps in protection of digital works remain. First, movie and TV programming owners are concerned about the theft of their digital works distributed in unprotected over-the-air broadcast, the so-called "broadcast hole." This gap in protection has important policy implications, since the lack of copy protection for digital broadcasts poses the risk that high-quality, digital video content will only be available on cable or satellite, where digital rights management technology is available.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
-0.624
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0118720935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039663773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015720148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001239152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010135247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002416255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.8878E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.88584E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.09122E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7589E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.562E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
65.434
Magnitude:
102
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Patrick Leahy

Some content owners have warned that this could lead to a decline in high-quality content available on free over-the-air terrestrial broadcasts. The same multi-industry group that successfully developed the copy protection system used on the DVD is working on technical specifications for a "broadcast flag" that adds bits to broadcasts to prevent redistribution online.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0260181958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033078526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009715729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005885715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003523302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002343299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002073314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002024672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001351078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.65225E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.14813E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.115
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Patrick Leahy

Second, content owners are concerned about the audio-visual content delivered "in the clear" to the analog sets that are a staple in American households. They are concerned about them being converted into unprotected digital format and posted on the Internet for free downloading. The most promising technical solution for this so-called "analog hole" appears to be watermarking copy control technology, and there have been a lot of multi-industry meetings on that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.838
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0256942993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0140551521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040194263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028598719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010166971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005392762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003585112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001976856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001249494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.79048E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.1312E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.659
Magnitude:
54
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.2
Gunning-Fog Score
18.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32

Patrick Leahy

Finally, all content owners are concerned about peer-to- peer distribution services that allow the downloading of vast selections of valuable content for free. The hard reality is that unless the content is protected at the outset of the distribution chain, I am not aware of any easy technical solution to stop online piracy over these systems, other than tough enforcement of the laws.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.27297
VADER
0.906
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0021920896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009294205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005902454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002009221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001620104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.69349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.75184E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.02949E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.4154E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.2193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.525E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.09
Magnitude:
71
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Patrick Leahy

So despite the strides that have been made over the past few years to find technical solutions that protect digital works in a variety of distribution channels and forms, some are now telling the Congress that progress in finding technical solutions to the remaining gaps in protection are at an impasse. As a result, they are seeking congressional intervention to give the information technology companies a limited time to find solutions, or else turn the entire job of developing digital rights management systems over to a government agency. That strikes me as wrong-headed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.29412
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.29412
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.57054
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0434244721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032655553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026385607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015805335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004215892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001938916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001498283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.01626E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.18856E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.66172E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.42285E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
81.412
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Patrick Leahy

In an era when technology is changing so fast, to think that we are going to, by government fiat, determine what that is going to be, we will be back to the same kinds of things that slowed the development of good TV reception and a lot of other things.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0019785477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004364328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003512573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001825669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
7.33215E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.84337E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.00459E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2106E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.0111E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9944E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.044E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.409
Magnitude:
93
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Patrick Leahy

As I cautioned when the Hatch-Leahy distance education bill passed last summer, the copyright owners are a diverse group and some may want more flexibility. A government-mandated technical standard may produce a one-size-fits-all technology that may not suit the purposes of all content owners and may end up stifling innovative new technologies and implementations. Such a technology will not pass the U.S. Senate. There is no guarantee that the government agency will select the best technology to become the American standard, or in any shorter time period than the voluntary, industry-led process currently underway.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.871
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0216231085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0111555819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0029010809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014614385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011358949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008115216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004017903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003657119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002226054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.82603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.00682E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.899
Magnitude:
50
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Patrick Leahy

America's creators, innovators and consumers have and will continue to gain a great deal if the private sector works cooperatively to ensure that digital content can be distributed efficiently and securely. In my view, the private sector is best situated to guarantee that innovation, both technological innovation and creative innovation, continues without limitation or inhibition.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.76214
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.985
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0154679583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002883866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008658037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006942154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002649748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001038007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.24897E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.96392E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.05263E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.04575E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.19497E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.729
Magnitude:
95
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
3.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

I remember some of the communications systems that our Government has put together for everything from Air Force One on through, and great talk about the millions of dollars spent and good they were, and usually they were about one-quarter as good as what they could have bought off the shelf in any company in America.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.872
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0120743083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0116787189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.005899843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008924458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008169158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002928983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001586493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001387282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.37059E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.75347E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.44765E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
69.765
Magnitude:
55
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Patrick Leahy

Government regulators are simply not close enough to the marketplace to be in the best position to craft the kinds of standards that will protect the vital and vibrant asset that is given to consumers around the globe by America's entertainment and copyright industries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.949
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0296415121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0170121377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0097831115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013845662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007209112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000631263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004675078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001590744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.338E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.03047E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2507E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.814
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

So we will keep on working on this. Senator Hatch and I would ask that senior executives at media, information technology and consumer electronics companies get more involved in the discussions underway about digital rights management systems and make sure that the people participating in those talks meet on a regular basis. We urge you to make sure that they have the appropriate level of seniority, know-how and experience to keep the negotiations moving forward and not simply have negotiations for the sake of having negotiations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.008055431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0079205238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0053956777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002072069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019831003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001324521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001275321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.6344E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.3034E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.7786E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.494E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
94.78
Magnitude:
44
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30

Patrick Leahy

You may want to have monthly conference calls with your peers, whatever works best, but have people that can actually give an answer. I hope you will be in touch with each industry sector leader to make sure that we are doing something that is timely, consumer-friendly, technically feasible, and cost- effective. Ms. Rosen and Mr. Valenti and others have been briefing us about these discussions for years. I have taken part in some of them. I would hope you could send Senator Hatch and me regular updates on what you are doing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.956
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0592521334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0138530158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0068981317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001786668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0017313174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005448375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000442244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001900191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000130778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.117E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1466E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
78.799
Magnitude:
86
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Patrick Leahy

We have set up a new page on the committee Web site to post these progress reports. You see them over on that screen, and I would hope that people would use them. It is called "Protecting Creative Works in a Digital Age" and it can be found at www.judiciary.senate.gov. Senator Hatch and I have worked hard on this and we want your comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1028681174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0324697321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0207894991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0101852878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035572837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008878878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007258126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003096293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002282791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001831077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000160645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
29.779
Magnitude:
93
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.5
Gunning-Fog Score
5.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
8.1
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

For those are following this debate, we have also provided links to relevant legislation and committee hearings. We have an e-mail address where comments may be sent and we are going to post some of these comments. I am doing this to make this as available as possible, not just for those who are within this room, but whether they are sitting in Provo, Utah, or Bethel, Vermont, or anywhere else, they can do it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0371850416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0086410852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0013734339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001639144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001512265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.98146E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.58435E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.1382E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.937E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.13E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.117E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
60.505
Magnitude:
67
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Note

[Information on the committee Web site follows:]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0128428524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053692536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024265619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017293274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017004353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007521733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000612091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001648618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.14282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.14208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4186E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Note

[GRAPHICS NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0155122674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054561177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0045236371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019027468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009074381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003755101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.25007E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.95562E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.41879E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.0737E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.176E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Note

[The prepared statement of Senator Leahy follows:] Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy When I first arrived in the Senate television broadcasts were no longer just in black and white and record players had high-fidelity and stereophonic sound. The personal computer, email, high-definition television, CDs, DVDs, wireless communications devices and the Internet were yet to be created. Now these are among the ubiquitous tools we use today to do our work, talk to friends and family, listen to music, watch a movie, or play a video game. Each new tool has spawned new opportunities, entirely new industries, new ways to package and sell products, and new ways for consumers to enjoy copyrighted works. It is no surprise that the intellectual property generated in this country is an economic engine that is the envy of the world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.875
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.875
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.33537
VADER
0.904
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0111117348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0099118603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039563132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016407079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013056318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012859541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002388341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002072433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.5797E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.8436E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1267E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43

Patrick Leahy

Challenge of New Technologies. The challenge of protecting music, motion pictures, sound recordings, computer software and other copyrighted works in digital formats has been the focus of the Judiciary Committee's sustained attention over the past few Congresses. I have worked in partnership with Senator Hatch, and other Members of this Committee, to keep our copyright laws up to date to protect the rights of creators and ensure that consumers enjoy a vast selection of new and different educational, entertainment and other copyrighted products.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.896
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0024690531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018701672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013372081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007378439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002710583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001233521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001007056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.21715E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.3464E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.281E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
81.761
Magnitude:
128
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Patrick Leahy

We appreciate, having focused on these issues for so long, that new technological developments pose new challenges about how to protect copyrighted works and create new business models to deliver those products to consumers securely, cost-effectively, and conveniently. New technologies may initially appear to trump intellectual property protection, but in the end they open new opportunities for artists and new choices for consumers. Protecting intellectual property, which has been within the jurisdiction of this Committee since its establishment in 1816, involves far more than arcane legal issues and requires a careful balance among the rights and interests of consumers, creators, and innovators.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.66501
VADER
0.966
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.026115845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0115315728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042457228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013267982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010130976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004008878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001968492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.24775E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.3608E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.71889E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3913E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
38.406
Magnitude:
83
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
33.073
Magnitude:
83
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
11.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
42
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41

Patrick Leahy

DMCA. We were well aware of these new challenges in 1998, when I worked closely with Senator Hatch on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, "DMCA," to advance the complementary goals of protecting digital copyrighted works and promoting the development of innovative technologies. At the time, this new law was praised by Jack Valenti of the Motion Picture Association of America as "offering intellectual property the full weaponry of the law to protect its voyages in cyberspace from thieves who have previously determined that stealing creative works is very rewarding and very low risk." (Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, September 10, 1998). A core provision of the DMCA barred the unauthorized circumvention of "technological measures" used effectively by content owners to prevent unauthorized access to copyrighted works. The new law left to the private sector the important decisions of what technological protection measures to develop and use to protect digital works -- or whether to use any protection measure at all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.16667
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.16667
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.31015
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.77307
VADER
0.956
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0110702655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034667664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015491318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013458451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001033897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000432229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001703923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.24981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.19796E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.03355E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.154E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
40.803
Magnitude:
101
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
23.269
Magnitude:
101
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
64
Sprache Difficult Word Count
64

Patrick Leahy

DRM Progress. Technology has been the bane of content owners, who are rightfully dismayed at the rampant online piracy of valuable works, but it is also pivotal to their protection. Since passage of the DMCA, great progress has been made to develop diverse technical tools to protect and manage digital rights in various media. Multi-industry groups, involving technology companies, consumer electronics companies, movie studios and other content owners, have developed technologies to protect digital content delivered to consumers on DVD and CD, over satellite, cable and broadband systems, and over the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.5506
VADER
0.959
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0214216125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012893335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001248173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009870403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002470504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002071816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002027998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.7706E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.71016E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.25526E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.256E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.516
Magnitude:
159
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
40

Patrick Leahy

Content owners are using these new digital rights management tools to develop and experiment with new business models for delivery of content to consumers. Just in the past few months, new sites like Pressplay and Musicnet have offered legitimate sources for Internet users and music lovers to access music online -- all protected by digital rights management technology that has been chosen and suits the needs of the owners. We will also see today Jonathan Taplin's Web site for consumers to enjoy video-on-demand, also protected by digital rights management tools that fit his business model and protect the movies from unauthorized copying.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.958
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0141766301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0056963188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016881248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013526453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001290336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009935766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002296298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001378608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.50852E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.474E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.7691E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.805
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Patrick Leahy

DRM Gaps. This is not a perfect world, however, and three significant gaps in protection of digital works indisputably remain. First, movie and TV programming owners are concerned about the theft of their digital works distributed in unprotected over-the-air broadcasts -- the so-called "broadcast hole." This gap in protection has important policy implications since the lack of copy protection for digital broadcasts poses the risk that high-quality, digital video content will only be available on cable or satellite, where digital rights management technology is available. Some content owners have warned that this could lead to a decline in high-quality content available on free over-the-air terrestrial broadcasts. The same multi- industry group that successfully developed the copy protection system used on the DVD, is working on technical specifications for a "broadcast flag" that adds bits to broadcasts to prevent redistribution online.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.53846
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.53846
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.51724
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.51724
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.105
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0624056265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0481936324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.046284683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0150320528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.008759433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00022468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001737225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.91742E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.31264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.73834E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2651E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
71.708
Magnitude:
102
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
56
Sprache Difficult Word Count
49

Patrick Leahy

Second, content owners are concerned about the audio-visual content delivered "in the clear" to the analog TC sets that are a staple in American households being converted into unprotected digital format and posted on the Internet for free downloading. The most promising technical solution for this so-called "analog hole" appears to be watermarking copy control technology -- and this solution is also the subject of multi-industry meetings.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.838
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0054254535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002524099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019438823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006679511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005922483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001246337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.54504E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.53302E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.05748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.9573E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.421E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.552
Magnitude:
140
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
14.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Patrick Leahy

Finally, all content owners are concerned about peer-to-peer distribution services that facilitate the downloading of vast selections of valuable content for fee. The hard reality is that unless the content is protected at the outset of the distribution chain, there is no easy technical solution to stop online piracy over these systems, other than tough enforcement.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0112492206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047898582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012811325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011717494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009145107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003823723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000204011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.13555E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.22831E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4384E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1371E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.213
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Patrick Leahy

Problems with Legislated Mandates. Despite the great strides that have been made over the last few years to find technical solutions to protect digital works in a variety of distribution channels and forms, some are now telling the Congress that progress on finding technical solutions to the remaining gaps in protection are at an "impasse." (Testimony of Peter Chernin, at hearing before Senate Commerce Committee, February 28, 2002, at p. 91; testimony of Michael Eisner, id., at p. 92). As a result, they are seeking congressional intervention to give the information technology companies a limited time to find solutions or else turn the entire job of developing digital rights management systems over to a government agency. This strikes me as wrong-headed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.26316
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.26316
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.126
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0287756906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0081932601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025140955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017813309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014942854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014658506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005523897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003481989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001413703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.05952E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6796E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.815
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
48
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44

Patrick Leahy

As I cautioned when the Hatch-Leahy distance education bill, the TEACH Act, S. 487, passed the Senate last summer, "copyright owners are a diverse group, and some owners may want more flexibility and variety in the technical protection measures available for their works than would result if the government intervened too soon and mandated a particular standard or system." (Congressional Record, June 7, 2001, S. 5990). A government-mandated technical standard may produce a one- size-fits-all technology that may not suit the purposes of all content owner and end up stifling innovative new technologies and implementations. There is no guarantee that the government agency will select the best technology to become the American standard or in any shorter time period than the voluntary, industry-led process currently underway, to the long-term disadvantage of both content owners and technology companies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73913
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73913
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.76766
VADER
0.794
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0111569541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002889672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0022125352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015089551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000792187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006014755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002413102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001752489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.09316E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.55087E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7792E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.228
Magnitude:
117
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
48

Patrick Leahy

Marketplace Solutions. America's creators, innovators and consumers have and will continue to gain a great deal if the private sector works cooperatively to ensure that digital content can be distributed efficiently and securely. Deployment of effective anti-piracy tools to fill the remaining gaps in coverage is critically important because the absence of such tools may affect the development of new product offerings -- whether for broadband or consumer products.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.963
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0075756594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0073307951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0045227396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024202689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009317093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003247147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001386639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.07491E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.66718E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.5415E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.139
Magnitude:
133
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Patrick Leahy

In my view, the private sector is best situated to guarantee that innovation -- both technological innovation and creative innovation -- continues without limitation or inhibition. Government regulators are simply not close enough to the marketplace to be in the best position to craft the kinds of robust standards that will protect the vital and vibrant asset that is given to consumers around the globe by America's entertainment and copyright industries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.95551
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.988
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0068059227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034597182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034140885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015074364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013850575
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006174779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002384484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001021739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.75331E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.10321E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.3237E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.728
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
12.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Patrick Leahy

Monitoring of Progress by Committee. These are important issues, and this Committee will remain fully engaged, as we have in the past, in protecting the rights and interests of content owners and consumers, while fostering technical innovation. To assist us in that effort, Senator Hatch and I would ask the senior executives at media, information technology, and consumer electronics companies to get more involved in the discussions underway about digital rights management systems, and make sure that the people participating in those talks meet on a regular and frequent basis. We urge you to make sure that they have the appropriate level of seniority, know how and experience to keep the negotiations moving forward in a productive, timely manner. For example, you may want to have a monthly conference call with your peers where you talk about the progress of the various working groups -- and help break through the inevitable roadblocks. We hope that you will also be in touch with each industry sector leader to make sure that solutions are not only consensus-based, technically feasible and cost effective, but also timely and consumer friendly. Jack Valenti, Hilary Rosen and others have been briefing us about these discussions for years. We would ask that leaders from the content and information technology companies send us regular updates every two months to keep us posted on the state of the negotiations for finding solutions to the remaining gaps in protection for digital content, and how the interests of consumers are being addressed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.31015
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.78723
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.78723
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.04476
VADER
0.971
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0064694468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053571785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001159085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006043118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004574586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001333135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.32112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.57018E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.48049E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.31053E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.971E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
27.952
Magnitude:
71
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
26.366
Magnitude:
71
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
86
Sprache Difficult Word Count
80

Patrick Leahy

These progress reports are important not just for this Committee but for many stakeholders, including Internet users and consumers of digital content. The Committee has set up a new page on the Committee Web site to post these progress reports. The page is called "Protecting Creative Works In A Digital Age: What Is At Stake For Content Creators, Purveyors and Users?" It can be found at [www.judiciary.senate.gov]. For those who are following this important debate, we have also provided links to relevant legislation and Committee hearings. We hope to hear from many stakeholders, consumers and Internet users on this issue and, particularly, as progress reports are made and posted. We will have an email address where comments may be sent and portions of those comments will be posted for perusal on the site.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.03688
VADER
0.957
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0112886461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0096779273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039136663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005912719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005805834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005135413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002132864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.25243E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.61358E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.9626E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.314E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.292
Magnitude:
251
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38

Patrick Leahy

We appreciate that complicated problems do not lend themselves to quick and easy solutions, and we stand ready to help move these private sector discussions to a timely conclusion. We know that legislation may be necessary to implement some of the intra-industry agreements that are reached and we want to be in a position to move promptly and thoughtfully when the time is ripe.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.923
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0151528657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0109499706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040566054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008268149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008170599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001941646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.50855E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.80509E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.0495E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.255E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.189E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.074
Magnitude:
132
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Patrick Leahy

I turn to Senator Hatch and ask him for his comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0659417594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.062143727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0534424616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0226188829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0079657439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021125452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009470414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002550983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002132787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.50164E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.22246E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
33.764
Magnitude:
64
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
29.598
Magnitude:
64
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
20.674
Magnitude:
64
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88
Gunning-Fog Score
4.4
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

STATEMENT OF HON. ORRIN G. HATCH, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF UTAH Senator Hatch. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman. We have long worked together on legislation dealing with copyright and other intellectual property laws. We have all worked hard to balance the interests, and done so in a bipartisan fashion. You have cited the landmark Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which clarified the application of copyright law to the digital world in a way that fostered the growth of technology and which sets the floor upon which today's discussion really builds.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.886
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0048727266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030753974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004608145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003561218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001614703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.55551E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.78108E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.86602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.13152E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7682E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9812E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Patrick Leahy

Our intellectual property laws govern property rights that inhere in the creative work we enjoy over the Internet, over the television, radio, cable and satellite systems. Copyright and other intellectual property laws give creators the incentive and protection they need to make their movies and music and stories and artworks available to us.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.935
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0307741022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0267233525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033738321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008185964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006325146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004547735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004400735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000193493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.46949E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.77364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.4073E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.329
Magnitude:
93
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

In making intellectual property policy, technology continues to challenge us, but we have attempted to meet those challenges. In passing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act just three years ago, we sought to ensure that copyright owners would make their works available on the Internet by clearly applying the protection of copyright law to the digital world in a way that also allowed technology to grow and develop.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.866
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0199077185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0096894881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0064743719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0048300113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028603572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002250109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003549459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.54405E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.36518E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.03187E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.7136E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
45.908
Magnitude:
53
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

Our committee also worked with the Commerce Committee to take advantage of new technology to make local television signals available over satellite in the Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act -- an advantage I hope will not be undermined by anticompetitive mergers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.853
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1108758152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1082710107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.006001805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050420975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021600034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017976608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008729762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.46293E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.11419E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.41394E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.24208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
64.115
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
3.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

This hearing today discusses issues related specifically to additional technological protections for copyrighted content transmitted over digital networks and the Government's role. There are precedents for legislation in this area. Specifically, the Audio Home Recording Act required all home audio recording device makers to conform to the Serial Copy Management System, which allowed unlimited first-generation copying of music but stopped second-generation copying. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act included a provision adopting the so-called Macrovision standard for copy protection of analog videotapes in all video cassette recorders, while ensuring that certain programming continues to be freely available for copying by television viewers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.49651
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3606293816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1454943209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0900416984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0194875931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0160882031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033032691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009089971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008386587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003467054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000214989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000126989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.583
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
58
Sprache Difficult Word Count
52

Patrick Leahy

The lesson, I think, is we have been here before and we have met the challenge when technology has thrown down the gauntlet. I think it is your preference, however, as well as mine, that the market work these issues out, if it can. On the other hand, when it cannot, Congress can facilitate a resolution that ultimately benefits consumers and creators, the studios, and technology companies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9715962708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7084237188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4051150531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9449509904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9106568992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6560509559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2244787524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1440920285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.129386934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0909486145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0488112506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
59.938
Magnitude:
101
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

With respect to market resolution of the specific issues at hand, there seems to be something approaching consensus on the technology and use of the so-called "flag" in digital broadcasts that can allow digital home recording of broadcast programming, but will stop further redistribution of those recorded programs outside the home network to the general public via the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.05427695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0072857183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0057057565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047675552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036828638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012747926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004039514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001226918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.26684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.36483E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.2617E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
53.113
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

Plugging the "analog hole," as it is commonly referred to, is more problematic, but likely solvable. This is the problem that occurs when a digital file is converted to an analog signal for viewing or listening and loses any digital instructions that may have been included in the original digital packet. Finally, there is almost no consensus on a technical or policy front with regard to Internet file-sharing or general Internet distribution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
-0.793
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.307899178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1134317601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0994221657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0232300445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004388854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043270444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010199165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010042671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001690703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001451462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.43274E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.1
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Patrick Leahy

While philosophically we agree that the market, with its business and technical expertise, ought to try to solve these issues, I think there is a useful role for Congress, too, in reaching or implementing creator- and consumer-friendly agreements in at least three ways.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0507223012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0178366507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0107868684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035262809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018895482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011906592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010260725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006803643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004841213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002309213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.88853E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.37
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

First, we can help set deadlines and push for agreement where there may be deadlocks that ultimately hurt both artists and consumers. Second, we can help set balanced objectives and priorities. And, third, we can codify consensus policies or minimum standards.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0655859767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0511321006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0079545469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0054231979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037809517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021828857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013610613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005011517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002243057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001391356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.799E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
97.149
Magnitude:
43
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

The growth of broadband opportunities for many of our constituents is stalled, and it may be helpful for Congress to encourage all parties to get agreement when it is best for the markets, consumers and artists. I also believe it is necessary for Congress to help ensure that consumer expectations will be more fully respected than they might otherwise be in private agreement.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.985
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0219411726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054897231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0041826253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0036638703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018538094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018276001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.001001396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008585402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005593538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001784295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.74428E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
60.264
Magnitude:
41
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Patrick Leahy

For example, I would like to be certain that as new controls are placed on digital content that consumers are allowed to make legitimate personal copies, as they have done before, and use those copies as they have been accustomed to doing. Music fans want to take their music with them in the car, on the beach, to a party. Movie and sports fans want to watch on their big screens, not just on their computer monitors.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0354031275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.008248489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0057466073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0052720101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038326027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028306544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006274032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002949487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001893752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.59653E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.9377E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.196
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

Now, let me state clearly as we discuss consumer rights and expectations that we all should not forget that consumers will have nothing to enjoy if there was not the incentive for artists and creators to develop entertainment content and share it with us.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.708
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0364508567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074823394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047002388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028265571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027501967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002109329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000117496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001016094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.8825E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.93074E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2931E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.203
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Patrick Leahy

Moreover, as the HDTV market has demonstrated, without digital content there will not be sales of digital electronic devices. As with many things, this is a balancing act, but if there is one thing Congress does regularly, it is balance interests, sometimes not very well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.227
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0061349856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045376357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009395013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000353153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003530294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.92451E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.68256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.393E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.187E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.94E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.13E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
46.796
Magnitude:
44
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
31.967
Magnitude:
44
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Patrick Leahy

Consumers want rich content. To get the creators of that rich content to share it in emerging interactive digital systems, they must be assured that destructive misuse will not undermine their businesses. On the other hand, consumers also want to use and enjoy that content with the advanced ease, superior quality, and enhanced enjoyment that the new digital systems will allow.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.1431
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
0.979
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.084528845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0438215939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033212484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009857337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003800912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003132797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000242144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.22935E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.28778E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.09227E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.9728E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.367
Magnitude:
45
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Patrick Leahy

In another context, Mr. Chairman, I have said that if the media and technology companies will focus on the people at the two ends of their networks -- the artists and the audience -- they can benefit for everybody from end to end. We can learn from the lessons of the Napster case. This has been a cautionary tale to those who would leave the issues to the law of the jungle and protracted litigation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.009405383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004661355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00382607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012635919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007207827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001598227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001426379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.76399E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.64422E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.30364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2226E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.712
Magnitude:
61
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

I should also say that you certainly don't want litigation right now with our courts literally half empty in certain circuits. I just couldn't resist.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.43
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0484871503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0177823618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048272577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041071075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036225232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008714299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003718605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003676022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002957396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001172307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.03001E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.424
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Patrick Leahy

I agree with you. I wish you had allowed some of those nominees to go through during the six years you were chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1767585753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0620628416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0313107943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025405881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025262518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001704273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004745399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002492503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001917046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.66693E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.18753E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
90.078
Magnitude:
25
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Orrin Hatch

We never had a situation as bad as it is now.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1782970969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0703831203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0109497312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.009026222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.004552463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024938912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007434301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004865991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003093362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002089462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002087188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
2.4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Orrin Hatch

I should also say you certainly don't want litigation right now. This is something I would like to see us avoid. But I sincerely hope the ongoing music industry conflicts will not be replicated in the video context, which has been avoided to some degree by the slow rollout of broadband.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.592
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2442169003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0544913695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0232605176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0089028617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033603294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027042701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0025824862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003126139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001250412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001223342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.33476E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
31.196
Magnitude:
11
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
28.145
Magnitude:
11
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Orrin Hatch

However the issues of the Napster case are resolved -- I have been calling for years for a market-based, fair resolution to those issues -- that case may suggest that some involvement by Congress is necessary to ensure that technology and intellectual property work together for consumers and creators.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.836
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0030796062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013770944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004287579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003301951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.30462E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.98261E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.95081E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.5574E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.11306E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9377E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.17E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
67.814
Magnitude:
51
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Orrin Hatch

Finally, we must remember that the Internet is international. As ranking member of the International Trade Subcommittee of the Finance Committee, I know too well that intellectual property is our number one export, and we need to do all we can to ensure that our trading position remains strong and that our trading partners work with us in using digital networks as avenues for legitimate trade. We must continue to ensure that foreign countries will provide adequate and effective protection and that their laws are not eroded as they face new challenges posed by new technologies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0744411547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0525352196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0214302141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.011742628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025421807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021841954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006806661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.68581E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.10615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.27504E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7061E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
33.818
Magnitude:
49
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
33.691
Magnitude:
49
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32

Orrin Hatch

In conclusion, I also want to reemphasize my and Chairman Leahy's interest, and others on this committee, in call for ongoing informational updates from the negotiating parties and for input from everyone who has an interest in these issues via our Web site. I want to encourage the parties -- the content community and the information technology community -- to continue and redouble your efforts to find common ground. These are complex issues and with the right resources I am confident that you can resolve all of these problems.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.95551
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.88707
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0703828875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0192862164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0128844971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032038071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022829348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012910227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009526766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001968558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001740922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000138494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.26287E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Foreign Trade
Score:
79.577
Magnitude:
96
Code:
18
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#18
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Orrin Hatch

I think it would be helpful for us to get a variety of views and regular updates on the ongoing private discussions. I should say that if this drags on to the point where it hurts intellectual property, creators and consumers, then I think we here on the committee will introduce balanced legislation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1197247067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0275505445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0117266922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004285678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0038273323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035184239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005182057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000311293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002458981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001012759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.76353E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Orrin Hatch

So, Mr. Chairman, I look forward to the testimony today and I want to thank all of those who are testifying.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.422
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2261061454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1934717642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0677217438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0291753386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0213130261
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041362131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0028668814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0011929458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008439195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008315254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002564171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
47.698
Magnitude:
53
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Patrick Leahy

Thank you very much.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2202557633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0250763027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0131249515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.010373089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0088761852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016415484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0006918282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000365434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002534571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001526662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.21442E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

Our first witness will be Craig Barrett. He is Intel's chief executive officer. Mr. Barrett had a very distinguished career as a teacher, an author and academic. I understand, Mr. Barrett, that you are the author of a college textbook on materials science that is used today throughout the country. So we feel very fortunate to have you here, and please go ahead. Your whole statement, of course, will be made part of the record, but go ahead and hit us with the points you want us to remember.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.491
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0342485204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0184464167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0134777467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016227319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014881008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008124531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005161234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000310768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.61485E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.15422E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.86673E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Craig Barrett

Certainly, Senator. If I had a digital recorder here today and I could have recorded yours and Senator Hatch's comments and then obtained your copyright license to play it back into the record, that would suffice to give my present position.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0152668581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012506966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0008137543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001995873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001747932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001695811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001201016
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.20388E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.21281E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43086E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.182E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Craig Barrett

I really have four points I want to make. First of all, the high-tech or information technology industry does care about intellectual property and copyrighted content. It is the basis of our industry, it is the lifeblood of our industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1240531332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.073146919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0520177011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063420746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037540631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0033348162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023345567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007413132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002658485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002635383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.6796E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
47.025
Magnitude:
40
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.419
Magnitude:
40
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Craig Barrett

Second, the industries -- the IT industry, consumer electronics industry and the content industry -- are working together in a voluntary, consensus fashion to create technological solutions to copyright protection. I think that that process can continue effectively without broad Government mandates and will be the most effective way to move the technology forward and to protect content.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.55535
VADER
0.893
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0156507522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0130919274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0102910686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0068191366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005602164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004154099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003544358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
4.84975E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.84287E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.1177E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.04295E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.604
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Craig Barrett

Third, I think you will continually hear that the basis for content protection is really protection at the source. Once content is delivered in a free, streaming digital format into the Internet, it is very difficult to recall it or protect it, and I will make a few comments about that later on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.483
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0025865234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017360526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004520252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004094367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001926435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.76003E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.37001E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.00425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.73512E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.409E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.831E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.59
Magnitude:
53
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Craig Barrett

Fourth, I completely agree with both of your comments that, in fact, this is a complicated issue where we have to worry about protecting intellectual property as well as protecting the rights and expectations of consumers as we move from an analog to a digital world. So there has to be some balance between content protection, copyright protection and consumer expectations, where we have educated consumers in the analog world as to what to expect. And now we move into a digital world and they probably carry the same expectations with them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.644
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0759269984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0256298517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.018593017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021648661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011073645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010402792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003226764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001909759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.54067E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.15282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.8185E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
81.038
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Craig Barrett

Just a very few expansive comments on those four points. First, the high-tech industry probably loses four times the dollar content that the content industry or the movie industry and the music industry loses on an annual basis to piracy. The estimates are $11 to $12 billion a year for the high-tech industry, primarily in software licenses which are pirated. That compares to about $3 or $3.5 billion for the content community. I think that gives a relative measure of how important it is to our industry to protect intellectual property.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.5506
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0513731211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009379087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0070793496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0068422669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045641045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001181265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010724517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002214123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.28175E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.8393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.7671E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
51.747
Magnitude:
87
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Craig Barrett

Second, the IT industry has devoted an extensive amount of time, hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds of man-years of effort, working with the consumer electronics industry and the content industry to promote technical solutions to copyright protection.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1485783141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070118469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0060851969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0041153449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003071798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010894607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001700266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.03423E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.44081E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.7502E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.599E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.981
Magnitude:
38
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Craig Barrett

I have in front of me, if you would care to look at them, about three or four inches of technical specifications which are in the industry. These cover DVD audio, recordable media, and protecting content over home networks. You can go into any consumer electronics store such as Circuit City today and buy either content or equipment which conforms to these specifications. So over the last six years, we have been doing much more than just talking about the issue. Technical solutions are in the marketplace today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0439531519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0306791306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0169841456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0038291397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025875966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010123444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005170677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.66529E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.64602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.14817E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.8994E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.122
Magnitude:
88
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Craig Barrett

The basis for these technical specifications are really protection of content at the source, and then simply not passing content on to equipment or facilities that do not respect the rights of the content owners. So if the equipment doesn't honor the rules, then the content doesn't move.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
-0.309
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0446203456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0103314698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0071362716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037201284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015666434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003164856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001655394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.62112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.86455E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.457E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3893E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.215
Magnitude:
48
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Craig Barrett

In the six years that the copy protection working group, comprised of the IT, consumer electronics and content industries, has been working, we have addressed many issues. As you pointed out accurately in your opening statement, we are working on terrestrial high-definition TV broadcasting and a probable solution there, including a flag to monitor that content and to protect that content. On solving the analog hole, we expect to have solutions proposed and tested within the next few months. And perhaps the biggest issue is the one you mentioned, which is the peer-to-peer issue of moving unprotected content from computer to computer. I will make a few comments about that later on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0136884846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0110863759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0108166569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003177227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020930594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006648301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005671088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003728189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.23603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.31462E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5919E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.319
Magnitude:
112
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Craig Barrett

This morning, I am pleased to be seated next to Mr. Parsons' chair, and hopefully he will show up in a few minutes. Being seated next to Dick is important from the standpoint that AOL Time Warner and Intel have worked very closely together in terms of technological protection of content over the years.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0350998831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0296564103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0124152051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036958078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016924803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011830293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009361215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001153094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.96224E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5134E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.732E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.739
Magnitude:
54
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
8.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Craig Barrett

We firmly believe that copyright technical solutions are forthcoming from the technical working group. We firmly believe that in some instances there very well need be narrow, mandated Government involvement here, such as the ability to encrypt or put a flag in digital TV signals. But primarily we believe the consensual process among our industries is working, as evidenced by the technology we have already put in the marketplace.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.656
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0803962583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0526281423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0279967702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0103706465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0066902619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047067064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042075368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026704289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001349297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002269729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.03219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.136
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Craig Barrett

I would like to make a few comments about the peer-to-peer piracy issue. Again, the core issue here is protecting content at the source. It is very difficult to protect unencrypted content once it is just a digital stream on the Internet, and completely stopping the piracy of unprotected content is very, very difficult for the mere reason that it is impossible to determine the difference between lawful content -- home movies, home audio -- on the Internet and copyrighted content on the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.94444
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
-0.583
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0883971865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0230994498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0066753368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0059619029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011608925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004027528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003432765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001608397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.57684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.49782E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.20023E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.769
Magnitude:
84
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Craig Barrett

There is no solution to this problem today, although the industry is working toward possible solutions. I believe there is no silver bullet here. It will be a combination probably of legal solutions, business solutions, technology solutions and legislative solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0634585565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0602411572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0560499437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035929486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0007308671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000524925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004812053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003885127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.63836E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.22851E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.7394E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
94.337
Magnitude:
40
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Craig Barrett

There have been suggestions made that digital devices could continuously monitor content streaming on the Internet and only respond or only play protected copyrighted content back, authorized content. I think this solution is a bit simplistic. As I mentioned, there is no way to tell the difference between unprotected copyrighted content and legal home content once it is nothing more than a stream of ones and zeroes on the Internet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.27297
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.01285709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0121638819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0115223615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024613821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000374353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002240107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.87426E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.68452E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.69256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.0006E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.786E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.468
Magnitude:
70
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

If people think their computers crash now --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0214176922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012759907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012322828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009797423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002474255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002057394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002051743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.74009E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.74739E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.24975E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.214E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
57.122
Magnitude:
8
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Note

[Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9715962708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7084237188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4051150531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9449509904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9106568992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6560509559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2244787524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1440920285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.129386934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0909486145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0488112506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Craig Barrett

Let alone that, but the mere prospect of trying to monitor all the content that flies on the Internet, I think, carries with it some severe limitations. There is a technical limitation. This would mean you would have to have in digital format all the copyrighted content in the world. You would then have to compare the streaming information on the Internet to that database of copyrighted content, and once you found a match do something with it. I am not sure what you would do once you found it. You could deny service.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.821
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0141031065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034556593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034146451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003387453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021475013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010283069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.6038E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.10989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.3576E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.6774E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.11E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.665
Magnitude:
94
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

I think you go back to what you said earlier that if you can't protect content at the source, then --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
-0.12
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.007161816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031010844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002108554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011334202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006735322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.075E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.10262E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.0791E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9179E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3493E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.709E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
36.452
Magnitude:
21
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Craig Barrett

It is a tough issue if you don't protect it at the source.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.243
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2853433602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1848400454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0465707562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0396601652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033792254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017122475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013473001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.78004E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.93803E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.5016E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6224E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
72.763
Magnitude:
13
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
96
Gunning-Fog Score
5.2
Coleman-Liau Index
4.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

I might want to come back to that more. I just want to make sure we give everybody a chance to testify while all members are here, and I am going to come back to the points you were making and I do want to go to Mr. Taplin.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.668
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1111809048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0265335024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0122493278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.010634496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0058364963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0044075434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016059099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009840909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008949207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001244952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.51543E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
38.626
Magnitude:
49
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
36.13
Magnitude:
49
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
90.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
3.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Craig Barrett

Certainly.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0389709894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0283420115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0249597069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0206692101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0100044454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023076253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001902059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007726585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002997307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.09174E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.68141E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Barrett follows:] Statement of Craig R. Barrett, Chief Executive Officer, Intel Corporation I appreciate the opportunity to discuss the IT industry's work to create effective tools to protect copyrighted digital content. In sum, my message is this: we care about piracy, we are providing solutions to solvable problems, and those solutions come best through a voluntary, consensual process -- not regulatory mandates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.82455
VADER
0.945
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0427028921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0166389989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0133893089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0076409196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016696451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00046217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003358485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002303859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002148701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.44615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8173E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.167
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Craig Barrett

IT is working to protect content and reduce piracy Some in the content community have suggested that the IT industry does not care about reducing piracy of copyrighted works, that we actually promote piracy to grow our industry. Nothing could be further from the truth. We place the highest value on protecting intellectual property, and have worked in countless forums over decades to support and defend IP rights. We know that without adequate protection, content owners will not make their content available over digital networks. Piracy for the high-tech industry means losses of about 12 billion dollars a year; for the content owners, it is about 3.5 billion a year. It is a plague for all of us. That is why our industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars of our own money, and has devoted the time of hundreds of engineers, to developing solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.55556
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.55556
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.06142
VADER
0.929
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0100180012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0072425144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021800106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017584756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001408865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007914289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005454281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.64175E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2502E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.53E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6514E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
61.496
Magnitude:
144
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41

Craig Barrett

Good progress has been made This work -- carried out in close cooperation with Hollywood studios and consumer electronics companies -- has now extended over six years. It has resulted in new technologies for the protection of content made available through DVD'S, pre-recorded audio media, and "secure network" systems such as cable and satellite. We are moving forward with specifications for protecting over-the-air digital television broadcasts, which we expect to be finalized around the end of this month. These new tools, when used properly, protect content "at the source" -- when it is created -- and prevent piracy in any environment, including the Internet. Content is simply not passed on to devices that don't honor the rules. These technologies are available and in use today to protect content delivered to home networks.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.66356
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0354485179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0147490544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.012218437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002637577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006419203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001756635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001360657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.24935E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.38226E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.17062E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3538E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.916
Magnitude:
132
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
46
Sprache Difficult Word Count
47

Craig Barrett

In addition, we are now jointly studying watermark technologies that may help with the so-called "analog hole", which can be generally understood as analog outputs on consumer electronic devices. Content ported through these outputs could be reconverted to unprotected digital format. Watermarks may provide a means to ensure that protection rules survive as content transitions to analog, outputs.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.422
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3428338096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0733951514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0492310734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0160655312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0082239923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046891262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0034844124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004231432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000313321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.72313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.388E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.794
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Craig Barrett

I want to emphasize that, during these six years of work, there has not been a single protection issue put forward by the content community that we have not responded to with solutions. And those solutions are successful: many of our partners in this work -- such as AOL-Time/Warner, who I am pleased to appear with today -- are moving forward to take advantage of these new protection technologies to bring protected digital products to market.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.923
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0404924416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0391801208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0381030637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050899827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0040589504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023427419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000610606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003880039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001165713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.67642E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.51738E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.672
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Craig Barrett

AOL-Time/Warner and Intel are in agreement that where there are identifiable, effective solutions to specific problems that would require limited government action to implement -- as in the case of digital television broadcasting -- then limited directives have a useful and productive role to play. As Dick has stated, we are developing a joint statement of principles on these points. But consensus here is the key.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.542
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0622171268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0574510894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.015305134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.01415109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051509265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030970117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010152128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010052444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000214916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001739627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.07394E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.995
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Craig Barrett

Peer to peer: IT cannot police the Internet As I have said, the solutions we have developed thus far work when the content is protected from the source. However, when we look at the explosive growth of peer-to-peer networks, combined with the ready availability of unprotected content, we are faced with a wholly different problem. Completely stopping the piracy of unprotected content -- whether it consists of older creative works that have already been uploaded to computers, movies recorded off a theater screen with a camcorder, or copies of new films stolen from studios by employees -- is beyond the reach of what known technologies can do. No single solution -- technical, legal, legislative, or business -- exists to fully address this form of piracy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.93827
VADER
0.137
Leans Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0157089264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0087732267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0068534791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0055877408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027190979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0020118103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005098706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002210475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.89643E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.09816E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5088E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.29
Magnitude:
125
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
50

Craig Barrett

Some content providers suggest that all digital devices could continuously examine all data downloaded from the Internet and analyze it to sort out copyrighted from uncopyrighted material. We don't think this would work. First, once unprotected content is digitized, absent a watermark that can carry embedded usage rules (which must be attached to the source file), your home movies look no different to a computer than a Hollywood film would. Thus, this approach would require either forbidding access to unprotected content by the PC -- including home movies -- unless you submit your home movies for review and certification; or, it would require the creation of an online database of copyrighted works against which suspect content could be compared. This would be analogous to the creation of a worldwide fingerprint database, only orders of magnitude more difficult.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.70805
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.73089
VADER
-0.871
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0927405315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0522002112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0332588708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0220934511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0215346357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0151684057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012661925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003444065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000272909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.47865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2674E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.643
Magnitude:
137
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.2
Gunning-Fog Score
18.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
51
Sprache Difficult Word Count
49

Craig Barrett

Beyond these considerations, there are serious consumer privacy concerns about any technology that would "look" at everything you send or receive over the Internet or require review and approval for home movies and other personal content. Our company suffered a substantial consumer backlash from a much more benign technology, the processor serial number, because of the possibility of consumers being tracked through that identifier. Here we are talking about actually screening transmitted content without consent, which in other contexts we would consider a gross invasion of privacy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0863863039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0473565335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.041270291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0127163396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029065724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027363159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0024037812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003539731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001384127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.81171E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.84515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
51.574
Magnitude:
87
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
33.163
Magnitude:
87
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Craig Barrett

I mention these difficulties not as a justification for piracy, but simply to illustrate the complexity of the problem. Solving it will require hard work from all relevant industry sectors.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.392
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0594040961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0130823304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0130674438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0107022795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014965302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004179188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002267057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001649394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001238122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.04073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.05468E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
78.188
Magnitude:
30
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Craig Barrett

Broad government mandates are not a solution Nevertheless, there are content providers who urge upon us a pervasive system of government regulation to implement these ideas, and advocate the development of an "open", mandatory standard that would implement this Internet surveillance. It is suggested that this surveillance could be accomplished with an "eighty cent chip".
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.425
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0514977961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0102324237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0079745216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0053389096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027148048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010440202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009395828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001305221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.05333E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.5326E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.204E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.07
Magnitude:
55
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
20.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Craig Barrett

This is pie-in-the-sky, back-of-the-envelope cost estimating that has no relation to the realities of our industry. There are at least three fundamental issues, which are ignored in this scenario.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0258412852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0118241456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070691967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037271449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002834712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002019034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001605363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001138139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.65865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.04028E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.803E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
93.436
Magnitude:
29
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Craig Barrett

First, as I have said, their is no known technical solution to the peer-to-peer piracy of unprotected content, and thus direct costs of any future solutions cannot be estimated.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.178
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0367254514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0311284326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0277145446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042077856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040207913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014745562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008731486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.90886E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.04057E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.40446E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0761E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.498
Magnitude:
29
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Craig Barrett

Second, broad regulatory mandates would place all of the monetary, product performance costs, and loss of consumer goodwill on the shoulders of the IT industry. In the end, regulatory mandates for an unspecified technology of unknown cost amounts to a compulsory license imposed upon the IT industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0123613383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033740926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033443292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011958527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008571192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003577612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.94214E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.59842E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.19918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.7237E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
37.824
Magnitude:
47
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
35.764
Magnitude:
47
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Craig Barrett

Third, and most important, there are the hidden costs of slower innovation, diversion of investment capital, and lost ground in the global race for technological leadership that would follow from the insertion of a bureaucratic process into our product design work. These are costs that we cannot afford to pay.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
0.357
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0651618699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0242553841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0179372102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0146726612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010263062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006511373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003159651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.4659E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.9987E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.27577E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.431E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
32.96
Magnitude:
50
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Craig Barrett

The DMCA: balancing copyrights, innovation, and consumer expectations In short, our message is that the marketplace has largely worked, in precisely the manner envisioned by the DMCA. The DMCA generally rejected mandates in favor of consensual standards. It also granted powerful new enforcement tools to content owners to give strength to the technical solutions arrived at in inter-industry efforts. Having been given this direction by Congress, we in the IT industry have come through with effective content protection tools that are available today, at reasonable cost -- certainly for new digital media products.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.66501
VADER
0.935
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0497609377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020326728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020024368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017567625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012085685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005988227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003039503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002551292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001779776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001422422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8236E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
36.751
Magnitude:
93
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
26.384
Magnitude:
93
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44

Craig Barrett

In all of this, however, we cannot lose sight of the consumer. Pursuit of maximum control is not the highest value; there are other values at stake, most importantly consumers' expectations for lawfully using both technology and content for personal use. The challenge is to permit the consumer flexibility and portability in his or her home and personal environment, yet prevent unlawful reproduction and redistribution. Balance is the key, but finding that balance can at times be difficult. Consider these examples: "Cul-de-sac" technologies that do not allow content to be played on different digital devices. I have here an example of that: the "SACD", which is not playable in a PC. This is designed to thwart the customer's ability to make playlists of individual songs or download the songs to a portable player in a protected environment, and it amounts to a limitation on the right to make audio copies, which is recognized in the law. The accommodation of legitimate fair use of content. One good example of this problem, which this Committee has grappled with, is fair use of content in the distance-learning environment. Congress needs to give careful consideration to the question of how consumer expectations for using technology and content, which developed in an analog era, will be preserved in the digital age. Chairman Leahy. Jonathan Taplin is the CEO of Intertainer, which offers broadband video on demand film services in 35 markets, including Vermont and Utah. In some ways, I would like to hear about Mr. Taplin's earlier career when he was road manager for Bob Dylan and The Band, but I would suspect that that would have to be the source of an off-the-record hearing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.86667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.86667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.26868
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45833
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45833
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.96684
VADER
0.954
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0074919066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0036362464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024986286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009740026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005441801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005222331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001068315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.8664E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.7335E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.301E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.9349E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.416
Magnitude:
279
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
98
Sprache Difficult Word Count
97

Jonathan Taplin

With pleasure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0040742689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0023834242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019211622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006540019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002169976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001323201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000121977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.9966E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.0377E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4006E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.181E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Taplin, go ahead.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.006446513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0063575826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052408464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041143325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0034732453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011131721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010890815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007754474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005144663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.20333E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.68863E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Jonathan Taplin

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee. I really welcome the opportunity to come before you this morning to discuss the protection of copyrighted works in a world of digital media.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.834
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0412160094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0179959519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032250904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026960097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011710021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000566216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004713354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.1863E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.84199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.55242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.22933E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
63.984
Magnitude:
52
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Jonathan Taplin

I have been fortunate enough since I graduated from Princeton in 1969 to work with a lot of great artists, including Bob Dylan and The Band, George Harrison, Martin Scorsese, Gus Van Sant, Wim Wenders, the Coen Brothers, and so I really take seriously the notion that protection of artists' rights are important.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.76
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0150965905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0137096853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057490462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003861501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017899169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007222925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002403731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.61338E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.95742E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6941E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.582
Magnitude:
55
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
20.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Jonathan Taplin

Because I have been around the entertainment business for quite a long time, I have seen the entertainment companies say that the audio cassette was going to kill the record industry, that the video cassette was going to kill the movie industry, and now that digital distribution of content is going to kill both industries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.889
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0492010673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0196782319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050172039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049669754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022749953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008822596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007457278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7439E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.7028E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.0226E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4608E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.035
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Jonathan Taplin

I must say that the company I lead today, Intertainer, started in 1996 with the notion that digital broadband networks would be the conduit for on-demand delivery of the best of American and world culture into the home. We have been able to realize that vision and in the last few years we have, in fact, earned the trust and licensed content from many of the leading Hollywood media companies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.94444
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual > Minors
0.0334049517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0130220171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0107171385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083453058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034792425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0026069634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001316646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000117215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001127653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.36569E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.15203E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.151
Magnitude:
50
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.5
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

Even though in the last year some of the major studios have withdrawn these content licenses, today Intertainer's service features content from 65 different media companies, including major studios such as Warner Brothers, DreamWorks, MGM, and television networks such as NBC, ESPN, Discovery Channel, PBS, BBC and the A&E Network.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0220845002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0190037332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020250456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019037812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006767869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005457704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003443842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.16647E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.27544E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0589E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.3011E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.695
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Jonathan Taplin

We have this content because the content owners trust us to protect it, and the content is all digitally encrypted at the source and protected by a commercially available digital rights management system that is part of the Microsoft Windows Media Player. A similar DRM system built by InterTrust is also offered with a real media player. It is my belief that continually innovating new DRM systems are being continually improved, including ones from Intel and other players in the world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.43399
VADER
0.898
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0612068747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0103191429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0046037567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0041133986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036441543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002442223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013510789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011381819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008155108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002976527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.20867E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
63.3
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Jonathan Taplin

I think that the fact that every week my company gets brought a new DRM system, a new encryption technology, says that the technology industry is willing to spend the money to build these tools. The thing that is interesting is that they are continually getting better. In fact, the motion picture engineering group Ampeg has a new XRML interoperability standard that most of the major companies have signed on to. So I think there is continuous innovation in this world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0318608276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0108696579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0049744838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036483616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024091603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014912589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009777112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008854348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004325841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.26667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.66
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

I think that the bigger problem for myself, my company and many people in this industry is that we have been told that broadband won't grow until content gets on the network, and so we have a kind of classic chicken-and-egg problem here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.66
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0055230037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0048602382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045961107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030866035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001797671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004987221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001619496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.03852E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.34637E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7288E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2096E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.978
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Jonathan Taplin

The problem for me is not with content. We have over 70,000 hours of content that we can put out on the network, but it is more like if you imagine picking up your telephone and every other time you couldn't get a dial tone. That is equivalent to what is happening in broadband today. Essentially, networks are being over-subscribed, so that the average user has no idea of the quality of the service that he is getting.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.31015
VADER
-0.001
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0355067285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0297869265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0070032263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065366323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0064519321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025324654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013069623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.96258E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.2791E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5665E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.241E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.017
Magnitude:
87
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Jonathan Taplin

So, for me, I need a service of 500 kilobits per second, and I will just quickly show you what it looks like at 500 kilobits per second. I will play a movie here off my service. I am asked to confirm the purchase and then I can take it to full screen. I need this 500-kilobits-per-second service and I need it to be consistent. If, on a bad night, a user gets 96K based on thinking that they have got a broadband service, that is a real problem.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.46667
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.46667
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.93827
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0264279166
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025154794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0009510444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003211202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002585344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002215308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001666793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.67255E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.429E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.3323E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.6359E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.423
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.3
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
5.4
SMOG Index
8.4
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Jonathan Taplin

I think the fact that less than 6 percent of the optical fiber that was laid down in the tech boom of the last four years is in use should concern not only investors in Cisco, Nortel, Lucent, and Intel, but also educators, medical professionals, and every artist interested in reaching an audience with film, a song, or a game.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.696
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0210398823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048697766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.00256358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013596797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009837569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006041689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004158071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.46636E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.50141E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9116E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6155E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.462
Magnitude:
76
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

With the right regulatory guidance, we could offer interactive DVD-quality video on demand service to almost every home and classroom in the country by the end of 2003. This service could retrain workers in their homes, provide inexpensive video conferencing, allow doctors to have access to specialists for consultation, and provide an open platform for the film makers and musicians of the country to reach their audience without having to pay most of their income to gatekeepers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.157
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0128732718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036199399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009937596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004892252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003404006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.51171E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.60573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6733E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.3106E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2587E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4864E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.847
Magnitude:
83
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Jonathan Taplin

So in the end I am very hopeful and I have a lot of optimism that we will have -- we have spent as a country $1 trillion on optical fiber and we are either going to use it or we are going to lose it. The fact that every third day some optical fiber company goes into bankruptcy says to me that we have to figure out a way, having built the information highway, to put the on and off ramps onto it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.656
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3763750661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1290835207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0943729421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0290208962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0097476041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032541182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010141367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002617773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001606571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001322972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.96365E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Jonathan Taplin

Thank you very much.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0128379426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0063758751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035954337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010093279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007148285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006736247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005055507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.55113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.35591E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2916E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9886E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Note

[Video shown.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0080832244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0059003381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019223628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012777747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001948775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001338439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.33007E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.65493E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.69292E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.5075E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7519E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
22.527
Magnitude:
7
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Patrick Leahy

That was fascinating. What is the movie?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.542
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.5281035323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.4922211636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2659564139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0353232259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0310823496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0133737674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0034192104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0007280456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004736831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.10186E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.65455E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
37.263
Magnitude:
12
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.3
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
1.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Jonathan Taplin

It is called "Art of War." It is a Warner Brothers movie.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.599
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0993983936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0547552831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.013429868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0120796183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026722197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022862028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007872074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005946541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003605145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.42787E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.77387E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.578
Magnitude:
24
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
95
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
4.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Patrick Leahy

I just want to make sure I understand the technology. Is that movie being streamed out in real time or are you downloading it?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0476753485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0067380126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034396147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019358607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001112512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005469954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004680918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004620673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001934209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6568E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4614E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.682
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Jonathan Taplin

We are using open IP networks, either DSL modems or cable modems, in college dormitories. We believe there are about 21 million computers that I would call residential computers -- that is, excluding the office market -- that have access to a potentially 500-kilobit or better network.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0213202598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0072791838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0069120848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013642022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013480006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002637654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001143097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.89819E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.56096E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.21928E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.09012E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.932
Magnitude:
42
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Jonathan Taplin

The problem is simply a matter of this over-subscription and it is a fairly simple issue. The networks are trying to sign on as many customers at $49.95 as possible without making the purchase of another optical fiber loop in the local loop.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.7388490718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.6662149914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0633298594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0446212827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0156212031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0135241688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0122317389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0020234665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0013488505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0013166979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002248549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.942
Magnitude:
26
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

Yes, that is a problem. In rural areas, it is a problem when they do the same thing on the satellites and you suddenly get overloaded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0167359802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000804425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006937772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006609617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002742678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002388722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001259617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.44587E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.56365E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2938E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.6692E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.217
Magnitude:
47
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Jonathan Taplin

Yes, it is an over-subscription matter. I mean, we all know what happened on 9/11 in New York City. If everyone wants to pick up the phone at the same time, there is no phone service. The problem obviously with broadband is that is what happens every day.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.273
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0093611096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0081566286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0052525949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009306179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003874684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002185496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.79703E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.40181E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.7271E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.603E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.923E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
55.197
Magnitude:
129
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
22.809
Magnitude:
129
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Taplin follows:] Statement of Jonathan Taplin, CEO, Intertainer, Inc. Mr. Chairman, Senator Hatch, members of the committee, I welcome the opportunity to come before you this morning to discuss the protection of copyrighted works in a world of digital media. I have been fortunate enough in my career to work with many great artists and so I take seriously the responsibility of making sure that the artist profits from his efforts. I started out in 1969 after graduating from Princeton as the tour manager for Bob Dylan and The Band. I produced George Harrison's Concert For Bangladesh. I've produced films with Martin Scorsese, Gus Van Sant, Wim Wenders and The Coen Brothers and as an investment advisor I was involved in the two biggest media transactions of the 1980's: Disney and Viacom.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.952
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0027988995
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002091603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019994104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011284924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008711134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005055816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005009496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004021284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003286269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.76595E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3265E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.635
Magnitude:
321
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
51
Sprache Difficult Word Count
58

Jonathan Taplin

The company that I lead today, Intertainer, was started in 1996 with the notion that digital broadband networks would be the conduit for on demand delivery of the best of American culture into the home. My vision is to enable Americans to have instant access to the immense library of film, television and music content that this country's artists have been producing for decades. The early films of Charlie Chaplin; the gospel performances of Aretha Franklin; all the wonderful artistic work that formed my real education was waiting in dusty vaults to be digitized and experienced by a new generation. Over the last five years, we at Intertainer have in fact earned the trust of and licensed content from many of Hollywood's leading media companies. Today, the Intertainer service features content from 65 different media companies including major movie studios such as Warner Bros., DreamWorks and MGM and television networks such as NBC, ESPN, The Discovery Channel, PBS, The BBC, and A&E. In addition, we also feature concerts and music videos from all of the affiliate labels under the Warner Music Group and EMI banners. As you know, over the past several years these and other record companies have experienced indoctrination by fire in terms of digital piracy. But with Intertainer, Americans who have sufficient broadband connection speeds can watch recent theatrical releases, classic films, concerts, television shows and much more with a completely legitimate, secure service that offers an excellent user experience, as well as a new revenue stream for content owners. This unprecedented digital delivery of premiere Hollywood content would only be possible if the content owners felt that their product was being rigorously secured and that the end-user was getting a high quality viewing experience. As you can see from this demonstration of the service, Intertainer represents the convergence of secure digital delivery and broadband connectivity to give American consumers a new way to control and enjoy their entertainment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.1431
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.64
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.64
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.4744
VADER
0.981
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0153314555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0048271013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015955142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008819063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006605125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004086125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004053967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.68175E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.55597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.02954E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.54E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
57.282
Magnitude:
207
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
120
Sprache Difficult Word Count
109

Jonathan Taplin

This content is all digitally encrypted and protected by a commercially available digital rights management system that is bundled into Microsoft's popular Windows Media Player. A similar DRM system built by Intertrust is offered with another leading digital media player from Real Networks. It is my belief that these and other DRM systems that are available and in use today are continually improving their encryption scheme and that they already provide artists and copyright holders with a powerful tool to sell their content in a digital world with a high degree of security. I don't believe that either Microsoft or Intertrust would argue that the DRM systems are absolutely uncrackable, but I do know that both organizations have been able to respond very quickly to attacks and change the encryption, thus rendering the hack unusable. In addition, my company is continuously exposed to a steady stream of entrepreneurs showing us new DRM products in development, which I believe is a strong indication that the traditional innovation that has come out of the US software industry will continue to develop more mature digital rights management products. The genius of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is that it encourages this innovation while providing legal protection for the copyright holders.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.16705
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.76744
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.76744
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0108072221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0066368411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002395435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008535985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008069751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003071896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002330058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.58201E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.35697E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.14101E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9966E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.348
Magnitude:
221
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
82
Sprache Difficult Word Count
68

Jonathan Taplin

I realize that there is considerable discussion going on in Congress about the need to legislate an open-standards digital rights management solution, but it is my strong belief that Congressional intervention is not necessary. As I've outlined, the marketplace is already working aggressively to meet the need for effective DRM solutions. A government-mandated solution would take considerable time to develop and implement, and in the meantime, content owners may seize the opportunity to withhold content from legitimate services such as mine until the new standard is adopted. Certain media CEO's will tell you that unless you mandate a foolproof copy protection system, they will never put their content on digital broadband networks. I have another point of view on this. Historically, open standards solutions are behind the curve in terms of attracting the capital and talent to keep them bullet proof. Private companies, in the interest of competition and innovation, are more incented to constantly refine and improve their products in order to maintain market share. With an open- standards solution, the inability to formulate a rapid response to inevitable security breaches is a fatal flaw. The system is working right now. Premiere Hollywood content is being digitally distributed and secured right now. A federally mandated open-standards solution would put a halt to DRM innovations and possibly cripple services like Intertainer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.22222
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.22222
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.42744
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46875
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46875
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.994
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0107983949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0076538352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008949411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003816477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002768957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001065322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.30205E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.59777E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.44469E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.08159E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6786E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.289
Magnitude:
228
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
89
Sprache Difficult Word Count
84

Jonathan Taplin

Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, I would argue that a standard for digital rights management is not the source of our digital piracy problems. It is my steadfast belief that the private sector already has developed DRM solutions that are more than adequate, and that technology companies will bring DRM innovation to a fever pitch once a more fundamental, underlying issue is addressed. That issue is the standardization of the broadband industry. What we have here is a classic chicken and egg scenario multiplied several times over: content owners will not allow their content to be legitimately digitally distributed until the digital rights management issue is sufficiently addressed; the technology companies in the DRM space are not maximizing their resources to further innovate because there is a dearth of legitimate content being made available for digital distribution over the Internet; digital content, particularly long-form streaming video content, can only be enjoyed with a high-speed, broadband Internet connection; consumers need an incentive, such as compelling content, to switch from their current dial-up modems to high-speed broadband services offered by DSL and cable modem providers; consumers who do decide to move up from a 56k modem to a broadband service are often frustrated because there is no guaranteed minimum connection speed for broadband subscribers, therefore many of today's broadband customers can't even take advantage of so-called broadband services.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.28571
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.28571
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.54654
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.56522
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.56522
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.24594
VADER
0.426
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0360720325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0145221566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0118788652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.008621571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002485977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002375684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012682228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010121986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005503522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001312474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.44484E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.318
Magnitude:
206
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
93
Sprache Difficult Word Count
78

Jonathan Taplin

To further illustrate this point, imagine picking up your telephone and not getting a dial tone on random occasions. Imagine still that you perceived that as normal. That's the experience of today's broadband Internet user, who has no guaranteed minimum connection speed and often finds that their high-priced, high-speed service is scarcely crawling above dial-up. Is this the fulfillment of the broadband promise? Many broadband providers are out in the marketplace today advertising the revolutionary benefits consumers will realize with these fast connections. Benefits such as distance learning, video conferencing, and access to enormous libraries of entertainment instantly available with the click of a mouse. But content providers looking to stonewall digital distribution until they find a way to become the digital gatekeepers will say that those vast entertainment libraries accessible via broadband services will never be made available to the citizens of this country until the digital rights management issue is addressed. Some studios that licensed to us in the past using our existing DRM system have indeed withdrawn their licenses in the last year and created a classic supply demand squeeze. My contention is that the DRM issue is being addressed; it's the distribution network for this wealth of digital content that needs attention.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.62162
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.62162
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.40282
VADER
0.893
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0545331684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.022265187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0158127412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0051438288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.004760786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005821668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004201811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003732601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003176071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.34062E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.15466E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.617
Magnitude:
132
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
81
Sprache Difficult Word Count
71

Jonathan Taplin

The fact that less than 6% of the optical fiber that was laid down in the tech boom of the last four years is in use should concern not only investors in Cisco, Nortel and Lucent, but also educators, medical professionals and every artist interested in reaching an audience with a film, a song or a game. With the right regulatory guidance we could offer interactive DVD quality video on demand service to most every home and classroom in the country by the end of 2003. This service could retrain workers in their homes, provide inexpensive video conferencing, allow doctors to have access to specialists for consultation and provide an open platform for the filmmakers and musicians of the country to reach their audience without having to pay most of their income to gatekeepers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.41369
VADER
0.77
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1058159163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0320579624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0058792026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040682626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023992945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001540869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010953333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.35116E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.982E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.075E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7362E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.76
Magnitude:
94
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42

Jonathan Taplin

To achieve this transformation the FCC would simply have to mandate a truth in advertising policy in regards to broadband. Today if you buy broadband service from your local telephone company, cable company or ISP you are offered "up to 1.5 MBPS". You are not told what the minimum level of service is. Broadband providers are "oversubscribing" their networks in order to maximize profits on broadband service. But to deliver advanced video services a minimum of 750 KBPS is required to the home for VHS video quality. For DVD quality a minimum of 1 MBPS is required.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.23676
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0147861443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0134593036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0125682796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070330883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043478998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004779581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002168368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.04208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.16766E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.5907E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0082E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.835
Magnitude:
164
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Jonathan Taplin

I have to confess that I have a great deal of optimism for what a world of on demand media might look like. A few years ago, Bruce Springsteen wrote a song that typifies many Americans' view of television . . . "57 Channels and Nothing On". Going forward our country has a choice of two visions of what our media culture might look like. One might be 500 channels (owned by 6 corporations) and nothing on. The other might allow consumers easy on-demand access to a world of unique artistry of such power and grace as would melt the heart. I believe that the same innovative spirit that allowed me to show you "Shrek" running over a telephone line this morning will continue to improve the current protection of all forms of digital intellectual property. While I believe that Congress can play a major role in moving us towards the world of digital abundance, trying to set a national encryption policy is surely not the way to get there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.62963
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.62963
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.40877
VADER
0.99
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0557350751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0376340526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0147755884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0112269525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0049440794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047692654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004338651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.58487E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.7989E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.309E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
24.987
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
51

Patrick Leahy

Joe Kraus is the cofounder of Excite.com and a new consumer organization called DigitalConsumer.org. He graduated in the early 1990s from Stanford and he borrowed the huge venture capital sum of $15,000 and built the Internet search engine Excite, which later became Excite At Home.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2465990372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0475654087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0072120798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036523616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018687284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009543889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002321607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001087425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.05889E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.5958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.13056E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Kraus, we are delighted to have you here. Please go ahead, sir.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.681
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1999791013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0465446821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0386120257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.027375482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0174699686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0075788026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0050522674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0043434862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.002836099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019802315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002993051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
47.072
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
98.3
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Joe Kraus

Thank you. Chairman Leahy, I am glad you mentioned Amy Harmon's piece in the New York Times this morning. I do think it outlines the issue well. However, it is not just Hollywood versus technology. As Walt Mosberg's piece in the Wall Street Journal pointed out this morning, there is a third actor in this play and that third actor is the customer, the consumer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.765
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0027973061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025087927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019601013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005635726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001188556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.05975E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.93904E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.12963E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.58304E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1208E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.963E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.2
Gunning-Fog Score
7.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

In fact, we will put Mr. Mosberg's column, one I read every time, part of the record.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0423480669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0125706414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0098758581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072832241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023742183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011715372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005337942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002005694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.83142E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.32924E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.351E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.009
Magnitude:
44
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.7
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.3
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Joe Kraus

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0840685039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0170891013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0143476689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.007655003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002198716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014463683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001383077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.10554E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.55959E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.51165E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.2042E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.748
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Joe Kraus

That consumer legally buys digital media and expects to use it in flexible ways, and it is these consumers whom we hope to represent and who we hope have a seat at the table where decisions are being made that affect their daily lives.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2266661031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0750315667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0428379688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0132187997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0104736762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.005219943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009850628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003112683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002358291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.23775E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.33354E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
39.294
Magnitude:
57
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Joe Kraus

So my name again is Joe Kraus and I am cofounder of DigitalConsumer.org. We are new consumer advocacy organization comprised of executives, entrepreneurs, innovators and consumers who want to protect a consumer's personal use rights in the digital media world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0166874277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095155046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022685805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000813281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002963201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002075989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002031912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.288E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.0046E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.942E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0741E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
34.499
Magnitude:
52
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
33.801
Magnitude:
52
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Joe Kraus

Before I begin the substance of my testimony, I want to make sure I stress one point. I am a proponent of intellectual property. I am a technology entrepreneur and I started a company and made money from strong intellectual property protection. So simply put, I am an IP believer, but I am concerned about recent trends.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.654
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0262053596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.010540022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0045565896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034208184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011981278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001996924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.74514E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.15719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.6209E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.3523E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1536E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.725
Magnitude:
76
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Joe Kraus

Historically, our country has really enjoyed a balance between the rights of citizens and the rights of copyright- holders. Generally speaking, rights-holders have the exclusive right to distribute and profit from the distribution of artistic works. Consumers who legally acquire these works are then free to use them in certain non-commercial ways.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0029389463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006235523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005288826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003276837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002310312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002241678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.63464E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.22322E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4124E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.2774E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8529E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
97.473
Magnitude:
36
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

For example, we are all used to buying a CD and making a tape of it. We are all used to buying a CD and listening to it in our car, making a tape to listen to in our car. We are used to recording a football game so we can watch it after our child's soccer practice. So essentially we are used to having flexible use as to how we use the media we acquire.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0140110351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083386869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0035373821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012746467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003630272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000349699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002465344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002085313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.81385E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6621E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9314E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
77.767
Magnitude:
112
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
5.3
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Joe Kraus

But unfortunately this balance has really shifted dramatically in recent years, much to the detriment of consumers, but also entrepreneurs and the risk capital markets, and let me give you some examples, starting with the consumer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
-0.519
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0484809803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0275066093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039374339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025717389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014578373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011185727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001124849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.32837E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.17382E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.8919E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.9682E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
46.093
Magnitude:
96
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
28.029
Magnitude:
96
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Joe Kraus

This past Christmas, I bought my dad a DVD player and within two weeks I got a phone call and he said, it is broken. I said, why do you think it is broken? He said, well, when you put the DVD in -- and as he had been accustomed to with his videotapes, when the movie previews came up he went to skip through them, but now the DVD player wouldn't let him. I told him that his DVD player wasn't broken, but that existing law made it illegal to create a DVD player that would skip through content flagged as "must watch." He didn't know what I was talking about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
-0.596
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0216414235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.01480176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0046320376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002436001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012066153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005858326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002907448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001158274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.15259E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.3908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0124E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
8.4
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Joe Kraus

Similarly, my mom bought an MP3 player recently. In early February, I got a phone call from her saying my MP3 player is broken. When I asked why, she said that she had been putting CDs on her MP3 player, but that a couple of the CDs she bought recently didn't seem to transfer. I told her she probably had some of those new copy-protected CDs. She asked what that meant and I explained that while she was granted the right in the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act to make personal-use copies of CDs she bought --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.115
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0126238898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0110687455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0094560848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050973711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015185463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008796502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008699685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004161296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001730713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.5749E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7303E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

Somebody has got an important phone call. If they would like to leave to take the phone call, we will allow that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0035254772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014872496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006026244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005021545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002160858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00013888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001034941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.42763E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.26106E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9347E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.5882E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

Go ahead.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.6400739308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2507194178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.163694052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0275814265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0235678992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0076700038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0019544701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001847616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001620896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.97082E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0538E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
44.487
Magnitude:
51
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
22.281
Magnitude:
51
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Joe Kraus

Sure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0127039995
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0113747556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0083863983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027381955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017979815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015934476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004765716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.97291E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.44992E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.85882E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.61834E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.912
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Joe Kraus

So I explained that while she was granted in 1992 the right to make personal-use copies of those CDs, in 1998 her ability to do so was taken away if record companies tried to prevent the making of those personal-use copies. As you can imagine, she didn't know what I was talking about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0143805257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0016247543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006175108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002741371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002411011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002309722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000128401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.46187E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.4878E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5799E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.271E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
77.464
Magnitude:
38
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Joe Kraus

So now I have a big "x" marked on my calendar waiting for the phone call from my parents when the new digital television standards are implemented because the standards clearly envision a market where a network broadcaster like Disney's ABC gets to decide what programs my parents are allowed to record and which ones they aren't. And I can just hear them saying, Joe, why can you record the nightly news but not "Everybody Loves Raymond"?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.106
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0032579592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020966314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0013591001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004447788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004239591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003501763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003229488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.55311E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.02107E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.8197E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.789E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
37.634
Magnitude:
55
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
32.462
Magnitude:
55
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Joe Kraus

So the solutions the content industry have advanced to date have been more effective at preventing my mom from copying her legally-bought music to her MP3 player than at diminishing major commercial piracy operations in China and Taiwan.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.714
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0174468791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0055277615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047848956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006467322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003747535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003721011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002501082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001737906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.83716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.84176E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.4641E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.118
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Joe Kraus

I agree with Professor Felten's written testimony that copy protection isn't breakable by my mother, but it is very breakable by many people with computer backgrounds. So when we debate how we prevent illegal copying, my parents, unbeknownst to them, are losing their historic personal-use rights. I think this is wrong and cannot continue unabated.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.813
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
19.4446027279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.2146762097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.010630746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036872108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027434804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004749251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001306987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001229938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.29406E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.20643E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
78.774
Magnitude:
74
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Joe Kraus

I want to stress also that the cloud around personal use rights affects not only consumers but the capital markets as well. Major media companies have used lawsuits and attempts to stop or delay consumer electronics devices that deal with personal use. It began with the VCR, continued with the MP3 player, and most recently is occurring with the ReplayTV personal video recorder.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
-0.696
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0329082395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056265868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041065043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001814118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004809025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002341193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001955604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001667095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.82593E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.44168E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.3935E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
95.415
Magnitude:
68
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Joe Kraus

When new consumer electronics introductions yield new lawsuits from the media companies, these lawsuits inhibit investment. Geoff Yang, head venture capitalist at Silicon Valley-based Redpoint Ventures and lead investor in Tivo, which is a personal video recording company, put it this way: "Given the current state, I can't see how we could invest in another revolutionary consumer technology such as Tivo, given the cloud currently surrounding personal use of the media people already own."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.586
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0791554572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0351871742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0188335194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0105963445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0098114186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001789101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013430192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004143982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001179255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001024382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.30183E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
36.295
Magnitude:
75
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.962
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
6.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Joe Kraus

Our organization therefore is advocating a set of principles we call the Consumer Technology Bill of Rights. It is a proposal we hope this committee will seriously consider, as it is simply an attempt to positively assert the consuming public's personal use rights. These rights aren't new. They are historic rights granted in previous legislation and court rulings which over the last four years have been whittled away.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.13549
VADER
0.765
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0843290123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0510938757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0163230754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0160150274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0136995848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0053570657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024503535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009719695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008613473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000194378
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.64274E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
72.058
Magnitude:
50
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Joe Kraus

These include the right to time shift, to record a television program and watch it later, and the right to space shift, to copy a piece of music from a CD to a Walkman or MP3 player, or to make a mixed tape. The full list of rights can be viewed at our Web site www.digitalconsumer.org, and I am happy to provide a written list to anyone who would like to read them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0303321955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0195285538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098499091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015822889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012364205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003917645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003351826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002490424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.46205E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.7919E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0886E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
34.745
Magnitude:
45
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
33.42
Magnitude:
45
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Joe Kraus

Under the guise of preventing illegal copying, I believe Hollywood is using the legislative process to create new lines of business at the consumer's expense. The goal is to create a legal system that denies consumers their personal use rights and then charge those consumers additional fees to recoup them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.422
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0056644349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001626984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007880668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003627739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002052743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002031116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.82947E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.46985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.2014E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.882E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
48.584
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
23.717
Magnitude:
66
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Joe Kraus

After years of successful litigation and legislative efforts, many in the entertainment industry are back in Washington asking for more changes to the law. All the while, services have been developed and technologies have been developed that eliminate fair use rights for consumers, your constituents.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0053647494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024881399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009218932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004482557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004134598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000279848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001496972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001054182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.57444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3436E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.109E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
43.269
Magnitude:
45
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Joe Kraus

Many in the copyright community don't admit that there are such things as fair use rights, and this denial persists despite 30 years of congressional action and Supreme Court rulings affirming. And while I am not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV, I do know this much: Consumers believe they have personal use rights and they expect Congress to ensure that they are safeguarded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.854
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0517201435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0399214623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0080938611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0057201392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034167821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004130669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002656491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001727003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.99848E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.10823E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2734E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
59.715
Magnitude:
24
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
28.582
Magnitude:
24
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.8
Gunning-Fog Score
18.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

Copy protection, especially overseas piracy for illicit sale, is an important issue. But before this committee considers yet another change in the law at the behest of the copyright owners, I would respectfully urge you to ensure that the interests of the consumer are ensured.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.044582531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040786734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003141665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008940438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000875262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007024635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004474003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002600423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.22289E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.11234E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.11567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Defense
Score:
60.21
Magnitude:
78
Code:
16
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#16
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Kraus, you probably agree with Mr. Barrett that if it is not protected initially, then you probably have lost your ability to protect.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.549
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1030923915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0015142702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011707385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002101809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.0908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.40744E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.89085E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.69095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.9837E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8473E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.061E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.542
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Joe Kraus

I agree with that, and I would point people to Professor Felten's testimony, a respected security expert from Princeton University, who said that a government standard that mandates secure technology is like a government standard for teleportation technology. It is not going to be possible, and any totally secure system isn't possible to build, in my opinion, and certainly in the opinion of greater experts than me. Protecting it at the source is most likely the only way.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0086376662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020326108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009416567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005953526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004753162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000326607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001693401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7127E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.27008E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.1573E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2604E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
44.261
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Kraus follows:] Statement of Joe Kraus, Founder, DigitalConsumer.org Chairman Leahy and members of this committee, good afternoon. My name is Joe Kraus and I am a co-founder of digitalconsumer.org. We are a new consumer advocacy organization comprised of executives, entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and consumers who want to protect a consumer's personal use rights in the digital media world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0237487387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0062869294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016581918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010497389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006648326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004742784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003679259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001321458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.98036E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.30722E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5829E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
38.125
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
27.11
Magnitude:
60
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Joe Kraus

Before I begin the substance of my testimony I want to stress one point: I am a proponent of intellectual property. I am a technology entrepreneur. In 1993 I started a company called Excite which after 7 years became the third most trafficked site on the Internet. My professional success depended upon strong intellectual property protection. I am an IP believer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.935
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4223532043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0487164245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0059630744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033418168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010013511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006757918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006515945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002760406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001343675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.0069E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6839E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.325
Magnitude:
79
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Joe Kraus

However, I am concerned about recent trends. Historically, our country has enjoyed a balance between the rights of copyright holders and the rights of citizens who legally acquire copyrighted works. Generally speaking, rights holders have the exclusive right to distribute and profit from artistic works. Consumers who legally acquire these works are free to use them in certain noncommercial ways.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.917
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0985399703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0394323841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0191166444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0163844976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0059000849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0044973258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009204595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002112135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.40114E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.26125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.4202E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.336
Magnitude:
30
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Joe Kraus

For example, we're all used to buying a CD and making a tape of it to listen to in our car. We're used to making mixed tapes of our favorite music. We're used to recording the football game so we can watch it after our child's soccer practice. We're used to buying a book and lending it to a friend. Essentially, we're used to having a reasonable degree of freedom as to how we use the media we buy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.55535
VADER
0.886
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0294558617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0220558824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0126593892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0044666118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022315815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003568323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001184643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.3026E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6439E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.175E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.46E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
96.816
Magnitude:
21
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
9.5
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

It's important to emphasize that these rights are embodied in legislation and court decisions. Congress and the courts have carefully crafted a deliberate balance between media companies and ordinary citizens.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0125148465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0120137047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083767191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0080901416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042410611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011143276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004912656
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.27968E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.69956E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.77918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4098E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
92.384
Magnitude:
10
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Joe Kraus

Unfortunately, this balance has shifted dramatically in recent years, much to the detriment of consumers, entrepreneurs and the risk capital markets.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Self-Harm
0.0475813722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0320442108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0305641355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0186334291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0061640254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045387391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0034279539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029211886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026219381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009065946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002722453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.944
Magnitude:
111
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Joe Kraus

Let me give you some examples, starting with the consumer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0046092566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0024729345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011856948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002982741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002922312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002824332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.19285E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.59605E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.7939E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.069E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.847E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
47.949
Magnitude:
128
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.38
Magnitude:
128
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Joe Kraus

This past Christmas I bought my dad a DVD player. Within two weeks I got a phone call. "It's broken" he insisted. When I asked why, he said that he put a DVD in and as he had become accustomed to doing with his video tapes, when the movie previews came up, he went to skip through them. But now, the DVD player wouldn't let him. I told him that his VD player wasn't broken but that existing law made it illegal to create a DVD player that would skip through content that the media companies flagged as "must watch". Needless to say he didn't know what I was talking about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
-0.611
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0082731058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0058894941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033780976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014186181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003422785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.59374E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
3.35776E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.59437E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.98273E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.9921E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8926E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.844
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Joe Kraus

Similarly, my mom bought an MP3 player recently. In early February I got a phone call from her saying "my MP3 player is broken". I asked why. She said that she had been putting CDs on her MP3 player but that a couple of the CDs she recently bought didn't seem to transfer. I told her she probably had some of the new "copy protected" CDs. She asked what that meant. I explained that while she was granted the right in the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act to make personal use copies of CDs, in 1998 her ability to do so was taken away if the record companies tried to prevent the making of those personal use copies. Needless to say, she didn't know what I was talking about either.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.813
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0042226955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027142532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023091641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004106357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002006184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001809759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.54045E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.05407E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.5404E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.6721E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.64E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
77.464
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Joe Kraus

I now have a big X marked on my calendar waiting for the phone call from my parents when the new digital television standards are implemented. The standards currently envision a market where a network broadcaster like Disney's ABC gets to decide what programs my parents are allowed to record and which ones they aren't. I can just hear them saying "Joe, why can we record the nightly news but not `Everybody Loves Raymond?' "
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
-0.112
Leans Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0500901777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002040459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020208226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017664155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012040727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005998155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003055642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002506569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001799145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001425733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8216E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
63.928
Magnitude:
113
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Joe Kraus

While I understand the desire of the content industry to prevent illegal copying, I believe it would be a disservice to the hundreds of millions of law abiding consumers in this country if the debate over preventing illegal copying suddenly stripped them of their ability to record TV shows they've paid for in their cable bill or copy CDs they've bought onto their MP3 players to listen to them in the gym.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
-0.494
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0180597068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0059196296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019036432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013108354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010682421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003754339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001810724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000168324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.70125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9995E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.65592E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
72.141
Magnitude:
31
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
3.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Joe Kraus

The solutions that the content industry has advanced to date have been more effective at preventing my mom from copying her legally bought music to her MP3 player than at diminishing major commercial piracy operations in China and Taiwan. As we all know, copy protection isn't breakable by my mother, but is very breakable by many people with computer backgrounds. In addition, I believe that the effect of denying citizens their personal use rights is to drive consumers toward illegal downloading. If I buy a CD that I can't put on my MP3 player, but I can illegally download a song that I can take anywhere, which one am I going to choose?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.45199
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
-0.715
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0069277172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056317676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049452585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008561077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004953255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001686299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001110534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.82817E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.48877E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.86143E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.4435E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
91.412
Magnitude:
18
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
39

Joe Kraus

In the debate over how we prevent illegal copying, my parents, unbeknownst to them, are losing their historic personal use rights. This is wrong and cannot be allowed to continue unabated.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.848
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0505509786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0413088419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0349269743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0098522956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0074841802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0042798376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0032083535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007585194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005703049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001433707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.30102E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Education
Score:
35.828
Magnitude:
99
Code:
6
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#6
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
27.873
Magnitude:
99
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Joe Kraus

The cloud around personal use rights affects not only consumers but innovation and the capital markets as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.723
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0304009533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0143615194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0050868333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00392033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006599974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001288095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.03038E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.87999E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.03919E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.43217E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5414E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.379
Magnitude:
64
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Joe Kraus

My business partner, Graham Spencer, is a computer programmer. Much of his time is spent getting different software systems to talk to one another. The act of examining a legally acquired computer program or hardware device for the purpose of analysis, debugging, or compatibility has traditionally been considered a "fair use." However, the same laws that are depriving consumers of their fair use rights are also being applied to programmers. The result is a chilling effect on software and hardware innovation. The problem is severe enough to have attracted the attention of some of the country's best software engineers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0137624709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013893715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010518262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008711516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007449154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006132151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002186711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001868189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001734732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.57098E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.6348E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.307
Magnitude:
94
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Joe Kraus

In addition, major media companies have used lawsuits in attempts to stop or delay consumer electronics devices that deal with personal use; it began with the introduction of the VCR, continued with the MP3 player and most recently is occurring with the ReplayTV personal video recorder. These devices were all designed to make it easier for consumers to enjoy the media they paid for.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0578068604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0321992615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0064466556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023172666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011038091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005212932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003636683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002798216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002754828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.75748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.263
Magnitude:
143
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Joe Kraus

However, when new consumer electronics introductions yield new lawsuits from the media companies, these lawsuits inhibit investment. Geoff Yang, head venture capitalist at silicon-valley based Red Point Ventures and lead investor in Tivo, a personal video recording technology company, puts it this way: "given the current state of the DMCA, I can't see how we could invest in another revolutionary consumer technology such as TiVo given the cloud currently surrounding personal use of the media people already own. This issue must be resolved before venture investment to seed the consumer technology future can continue."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
-0.477
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0023649443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010160205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004992074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000357153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003411751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002384033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001016407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8424E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.06062E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.993E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.47E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
51.166
Magnitude:
50
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
25.885
Magnitude:
50
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
12.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Joe Kraus

Our organization therefore is advocating a set of principles we call the "consumer technology bill of rights". It is a proposal we hope this Committee will seriously consider as it is simply an attempt to positively assert the consuming public's personal use rights. These rights aren't new; they are historic rights granted in previous legislation and court rulings which have over the last four years been whittled away. These include the right to "time-shift" -- to record a television program and watch it later; and the right to "space shift" -- to copy a piece of music from a CD to a walkman or MP3 player or to make a mixed tape. The full list of rights can be viewed at our web site, www.digitalconsumer.org or I'm happy to provide a written list to anyone who would like to read them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.9
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.9
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0157731673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037703052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018064598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010522194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009920835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007542808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.5151E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.82529E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.68028E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.6576E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3958E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.928
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
51

Joe Kraus

Clarifying, asserting, and defending personal use rights is good for consumers and good for investment. Citizens will have a simple, comprehensible set of laws that re-establish rights that they used to have. And, investors will have clarity on those areas that are safe for capital without the risk of litigation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.21888
VADER
0.873
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0044828277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033809563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033753124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025834372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013323391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007875897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003167764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001528823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.86914E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.8593E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7587E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.1
Magnitude:
118
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

Finally, there has been some talk lately of a need to create a government mandated open standard for digital rights management in order to ensure interoperability for consumers. I think a government standard would be harmful to consumers and innovators for several reasons.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1486960799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0194100227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0179293609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0075063304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0033916778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033244585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026473495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003556321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.68899E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.61272E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5188E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
29.582
Magnitude:
57
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Education
Score:
29.062
Magnitude:
57
Code:
6
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#6
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Joe Kraus

First, a government mandated standard is not necessary to ensure interoperability. The market demands interoperability and has no need for the government to insist on it. Examples abound. There is no government mandate for CD player interoperability, yet all CDs play in all CD players. Likewise for DVDS. Consumers don't tolerate the lack of interoperability and as a major market force, they demand it. Therefore, interoperability will occur as a natural effect of the market. (Although no standard has yet emerged for secure digital music, this is due at least in part to the fact that the existing technologies are too burdensome for the consumer. Once a suitably user-friendly technology has emerged, consumers are likely to embrace it.)
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.73089
VADER
-0.1
Leans Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0181587864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057198173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021179372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016654867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015974858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011069801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000303293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001483922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.04971E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3771E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4263E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
43.291
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
22.932
Magnitude:
41
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37

Joe Kraus

Second, government mandates are bad for innovation generally because they assume that the government is able to predict all possible fair and legal uses of technology or content. The very definition of innovation is the discovery of something new and unexpected; by mandating a set of legal uses and criminalizing all others, the government makes innovation difficult.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.45199
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.659
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0510245736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0279145723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0154119087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0031531457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0030468824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015429672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007595503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002488515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.34125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.41242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.783E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
36.281
Magnitude:
113
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
11.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Joe Kraus

Third, overly protective copyright laws themselves contribute to technologies that do not interoperate. Interoperability depends on being able to examine data formats, and as long as such examination is criminalized, companies will be restricted in their ability to create compatible products.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0796379289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0082518716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.006276877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.003521892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018760278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008742109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006075953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005313887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004172148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000368628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001416134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.011
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
2.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Joe Kraus

Finally, if the government decides to mandate an open standard, there is no guarantee it will truly remain open. Microsoft has a history of "embrace and extend" policies where an open standard is adopted and then modified or extended in order to introduce proprietary features which licensing vendors are encouraged to exploit. The new "expanded standard" meets the basic criteria of the open standard, but if this expanded standard is used to its fullest, it will have features that the original open standard cannot understand; therefore, the open standard becomes less and less effective. Examples of this behavior include the Java programming language, the HTML page layout standard, and the Kerberos security technology.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.92593
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.92593
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.87168
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0545012939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0242359893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.015305425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0105434388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0096708136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0072058923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0051338022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005070731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004114275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.01079E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.2336E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
93.209
Magnitude:
49
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
45
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45

Joe Kraus

Overall, I encourage Congress to remain wary of any solution where it is asked to "mandate" standards in the technology industry. Technological innovation moves too quickly and unpredictably to be constrained in this way. In addition, consumers already exert market forces to ensure a reasonable outcome.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.856
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0224091375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070785121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070605798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023251072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018887213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017356717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005957616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002951657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001018541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.18024E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2263E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
55.052
Magnitude:
180
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Joe Kraus

Under the guise of "preventing illegal copying" I believe Hollywood is using the legislative process to create new lines of business at consumers' expense. Their goal is to create a legal system that denies consumers their personal use rights and then charge those consumers additional fees to recoup them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.422
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0133026959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035575922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0031316591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023361514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021322185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020205838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001224585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.24751E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.01383E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.3839E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.235E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Joe Kraus

After years of successful litigation and legislative efforts, many in the entertainment industry are back in Washington asking for more changes to the law. All the while, they have been quietly developing services, technologies and products that eliminate fair use for their customers, your constituents. Many in the copyright community will not admit that there is such a thing as fair use. They will not admit that once consumers have legally purchased media that they should be free to engage with it in a wide variety of personal uses. This denial persists despite 30 years of Congressional action and Supreme Court rulings affirming consumers' fair use rights. And, while I am not a lawyer, I do know this much: consumers believe they have personal use rights and they expect Congress to insure that they are safeguarded. Copy protection, especially overseas piracy for illicit sale, is an important issue. But before this Committee considers yet another change in the law at the behest of the copyright cabal, I would respectfully urge you to insure that the interests of the consumer are insured.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.78571
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.78571
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.98592
VADER
0.98
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0473918684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0066565219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046121942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027918031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005602293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004180839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004018013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002900596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002596872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001551452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001302767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
56
Sprache Difficult Word Count
58

Joe Kraus

Thank you very much for the time to address this committee today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.036888491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0076978999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0070382543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019027158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012987136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007998756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.00040022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002377152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002118455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001445566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001009211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

I should note for the record we have material from Gary Shapiro, of the Home Recording Rights Coalition; Jack Valenti's statement; Hilary Rosen's statement; the Video Software Dealers Association; and Professor Felten's statement, all of which will be part of the record.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0589601754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0198371548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0083369458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0055316847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049279948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004865005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015938216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001034719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.5972E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.63472E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.60539E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
60.751
Magnitude:
97
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.2
Gunning-Fog Score
17.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

Of course, Senator Hatch and I have the Web page we unveiled today, so others can comment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0458113034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095610274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0052535466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0048833841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016699829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012797856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005159324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002074204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002051864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.1167E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.4588E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Patrick Leahy

I would say on the side that when you mention not being able to flip through previews, frankly I am offended by the arrogance of Hollywood doing that. Especially if I paid for a DVD and what not, I want to go and watch what I want to watch on it. It is as bad as paying $8 to go into a theater with the sound-proofing of tissue paper and a screen smaller than my TV set, and you have got to sit there and watch 20 minutes of ads, and then they sometimes wonder why people don't go.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.827
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0068848698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040011499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008551441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005773351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002463124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.57664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.55291E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.44444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.0583E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.29145E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.881E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

Justin Hughes is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where his research and teaching interests focus on intellectual property law. He has also been with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office focusing on Internet-related intellectual property issues, 11th Amendment immunity issues, and intellectual property law in developing countries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.898
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0235430605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0118651325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0097000186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0082662766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038168571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002602438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012902092
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012377809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.001057038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005623822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002527599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.414
Magnitude:
74
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Patrick Leahy

We are pleased to have you here, and when you finish I will turn first to Senator Feinstein for questions and then to Senator Specter for questions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.8473
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.034245904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0045613633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034760455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034115597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030074576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014071088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009794283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001212179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.04208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.78712E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.1593E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.737
Magnitude:
80
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Justin Hughes

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, for inviting me here to talk today about the continuing saga of copyright and digital technologies. By way of disclosure, I should say that, technically speaking, I am an employee of the State of California, which means that my salary is paid by both Intel and Disney, Viacom and Qualcomm, technicolor and technology-start-ups. So in my testimony there is probably something for everyone to hate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0406566891
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0145845886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0096898664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0029997438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021678245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014660086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002248163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001644878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.47048E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.11641E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3677E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.862
Magnitude:
97
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
25.374
Magnitude:
97
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

I think that we all agree that there is an enormous problem today with unauthorized copying and distribution of digital versions of copyrighted works. The worst part of the problem is still outside the United States and is traditional physical media piracy. Then comes piracy from peer-to-peer network systems that respect no national borders -- Napster, Gnutella, Free Net, and the many variations of Fast Track software. As broadband proliferates, owners of audio-visual works are understandably worried about being Napster-ized.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.354
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2545641502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1667676028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0576638966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0226343516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0054521799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034957586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0032430027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008669703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001245971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.10943E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.07774E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
59.737
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Justin Hughes

Now, recently there have been proposals that the Government should mandate specific copy control technologies to be concluded in all digital devices, and the thought seems to be that industry should negotiate agreement on the technological controls and then the Federal Government should make those controls a matter of law. I have three concerns I want to focus on today about that idea.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0079599493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004049961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.003862871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025407579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001906232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009499323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001912426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.10079E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.7852E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5366E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.3902E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
74.054
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Justin Hughes

The first is that Congress should be cautious in how much it is willing to defer to the policy decisions and legislative drafting of private parties. An agreement brokered in industry negotiations and then blessed by Congress may fail to address the concerns of consumers. Users of copyrighted works have distinct privileges under copyright law, fair use primary among them. Now, I admit sometimes academics overblow fair use rights and privileges, particularly as they extend to making non- transformative copies of works, but I agree with Mr. Kraus that those rights exist and that they are real.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.886
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0233748593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0186652571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0123505932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.005744163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047490103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032104927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012862619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004959621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000303711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002818138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.08423E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.953
Magnitude:
75
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38

Justin Hughes

The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act reflects Congress' reasonable concern for fair use in the digital networked era. The DMCA specifically provides that it does not affect fair use, and section 1201(a) was specifically crafted to make sure that the prohibition on digital lock-picking would not extend to controls for control of copying, precisely because some copying constitutes fair use.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.65
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0189624639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033432101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021377829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017989641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013467631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011634972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009890955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004134326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001093867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.30112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8188E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.129
Magnitude:
54
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Justin Hughes

In that same spirit, I think that if there has to be any additional regulatory structure -- and I say additional -- imposed on digital network systems to protected copyrighted works, it should be one that focuses on stopping unauthorized distribution over the Internet and leaves alone what some people have called the "home net." Whether it is a broadcast flag or water-marking or any other technology, if it is mandated by law, it may be necessary to determine exactly how much non-commercial, non-transformative copying a person can do in their home.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.178
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0207750723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0122573547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0106688072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0090938178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0071171882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017022865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009812719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000710405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001349714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.52123E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6644E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.862
Magnitude:
70
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

My second concern is one that, Mr. Chairman, you and the ranking minority member have already expressed, and that is government just isn't very good at mandating technology. And I don't particularly think that private industry is very good sometimes at mandating technology, and the ease with which various encryption systems have been hacked is demonstrative of that. But I think that government technocrats and bureaucrats, having been one, are even worse at that mission.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.195
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0060137158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020717371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015650039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002133387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001985131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.7187E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.95345E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.19718E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.44665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8801E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.742E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
International Affairs
Score:
69.385
Magnitude:
91
Code:
19
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#19
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Justin Hughes

Related to that, my third concern is that the government mandate of any specific technology to protect copyrighted works would be a dramatic reversal of Congress' approach to the digital world to date. To date, Congress has wisely understood, this committee in particular, that government should not try to pick technological winners and losers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0257018197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0117511401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030632444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030369787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013373483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011774006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002603401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.5326E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.32544E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3895E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.02676E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
39.62
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
32.673
Magnitude:
65
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Justin Hughes

In that spirit, the DMCA wisely includes a no-mandates provision, making clear that consumer electronic, computer, and telecommunications equipment does not have to be designed to respond to any particular technological measure. I think that that hands-off approach of not designating technology for the Internet is one Congress has pursued in many areas, not just copyrighted works. One example I give in my written testimony is the e signatures bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.2427282277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0522444898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0341940497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0239717483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0073555624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054411474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010021747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006732143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000130171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.55393E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.47791E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
30.313
Magnitude:
68
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

Related to this, I have the concern that if we change our policy direction now, we will have a hard time explaining it internationally. Having been one of those people who went around the world explaining the virtues of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and its hands-off approach to the Internet, I would hate to be an American diplomat who had to go around explaining why we had suddenly decided that everything had to be done a completely different way. It makes us look, to put it frankly, a little clueless.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.591
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0245908624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.010055134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030037654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023564411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013845555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009836001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001860313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001156837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.30456E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.62434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.65961E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
33.843
Magnitude:
59
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Justin Hughes

If I can conclude, there are tough decisions to be made in copyright policy, and those decisions may not be too far down the road. Many of the people in this room remember the hearing on Napster and other peer-to-peer file-sharing systems which this committee held in 2000. At that hearing, Chairman Hatch posed a couple of hypotheticals to Hilary Rosen, head of the recording industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.128
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0957182201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0950700487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.019333369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0154455251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0105854473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.006719277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001478146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001191027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001049211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.64368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.79378E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Justin Hughes

Chairman Hatch asked, if he made a tape copy of a CD to play in his car, would that be a fair use? He then asked, if he made a copy of a CD for his wife to play in her car, would that be a fair use? Ms. Rosen demurred from giving a direct answer to Senator Hatch's questions, and given her job I completely understand that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.88
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.057006086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0231682207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0084545376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0083698527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0066287321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015786129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010055312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000229168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.51672E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.85363E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0234E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
5.5
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Justin Hughes

But let me answer those questions a couple of years later. Are those fair uses? My very theoretical, abstract, law professor answer is this: If the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the ranking minority member and the other members think something is a fair use, it is a fair use, or it is soon going to be. [Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1023366582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0232908569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0160822688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0024584966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008127515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005377668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003627631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000137954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001023918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.75665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.11561E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Justin Hughes

And I close there for a very simple reason.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.026999219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.014779222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0071924434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0060999424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006097041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004199576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001215169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.33178E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.29055E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.91679E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.43126E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
55.994
Magnitude:
43
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.9
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.4
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

And we know that the ranking member and I always agree on these things. [Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0149546366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0133997688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0048959271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023378496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016642944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014440075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000603139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.9675E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.78289E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.58024E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.9
Gunning-Fog Score
5.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Justin Hughes

Always agree.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.025725062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0218568995
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0052520238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015168197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010450492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005655236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004572398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003268778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.44707E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.4508E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.601E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
5.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Justin Hughes

So whatever legislation is introduced in other quarters, whatever negotiations are conducted privately, I think it is imperative that this committee not abdicate its traditional job in deciding the proper balance in copyright law for the interests of creators, distributors, consumers and citizens.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1835554955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.129180809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0593784556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0354642194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0084639432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0042244996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040116298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005630542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003181913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003139509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.61001E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
60.277
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Justin Hughes

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0051920368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036588142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034476376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0028678056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020855001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017109271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013449354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005996291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.54229E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.87464E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.8321E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
66.113
Magnitude:
212
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Hughes follows:] Justin Hughes, Visiting Professor of Law, University of California at Los Angeles introduction
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0054812641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0050996077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014725944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014185694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007229009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005184162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000511408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000136549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.45213E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43572E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9217E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
65.122
Magnitude:
42
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Justin Hughes

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Senator Hatch, and members of the Committee for inviting me to appear before you today to talk about the continuing saga of copyright and digital technologies. During the past few years, I've had the honor and pleasure of working with many people in this room on intellectual property and Internet issues, although these days I spend more of my time trying to teach the law Congress has written in this area.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.933
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0353528245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0238302106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0141664277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040432849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007580848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005325728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003004759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001245838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000122617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.16073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.4358E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
25.028
Magnitude:
79
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
22.809
Magnitude:
79
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Justin Hughes

By way of disclosure, I should say that, technically speaking, I'm an employee of the State of California. Which means that my salary is paid by both Intel and Disney, Viacom and Qualcomm, Technicolor and technology start-ups. So, in what I'm going to say, there will probably be something for everyone to hate. I. Challenges to Copyright Holders and Appropriate Responses There is no question that we face an enormous problem today with unauthorized copying and distribution of digital versions of copyrighted works. Copyright holders face this problem and we all face this problem as an increasingly information and media driven economy. The worst part of this problem is probably outside the U.S. and is "traditional" physical media piracy -- as when you can buy a dozen CDs for $5 about 100 paces from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing. Then comes piracy from peer-to-peer network systems that respects no national borders -- Napster, Gnutella, Free Net, and the many variations of Fast Track. Web-based piracy in the form of warz sites; that is, Internet piracy from hosted sites is another level of problem. Finally, there is a certain level of unauthorized activity done by people at home -- typically, until very recently, in the form of taping works onto cassettes and videocassettes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.81818
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.81818
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.21131
VADER
-0.871
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0791477622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0159287054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0088257293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0081677128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0071191906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009104424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004097793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.14729E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.2028E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0482E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.385E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.822
Magnitude:
105
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
71
Sprache Difficult Word Count
70

Justin Hughes

We need to distinguish among these different sorts of activity for two reasons. First, the problem of digital piracy of works -- on physical media and through unauthorized networked distribution -- does threaten the incentive system that copyright is supposed to create.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
-0.178
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0933494768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0169618288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098709905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0072160699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048915641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003319871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012543291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001832091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.81449E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.88603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.75733E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
36.78
Magnitude:
39
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.794
Magnitude:
39
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Justin Hughes

But, second, a certain amount of unauthorized copying by private citizens -- at home, for their own use, and not distributed beyond family and a small circle of friends -- does not threaten the incentive system that copyright creates. And it does serve valuable goals in a civil society. In short, it should not be lumped with the other activities; it is not "piracy" -- indeed, much of this unauthorized copying has been expressly sanctioned by our highest court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.857
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0027361202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019074869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007726356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006260543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006054113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002193152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.93324E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.39172E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.57264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.19197E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7045E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.197
Magnitude:
107
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

To date, the efforts to fight digital piracy of copyrighted works has been twofold. First, head-on efforts to shut down unauthorized Internet distribution -- as in the Napster litigation. Second, the content industry and the consumer electronics industry have worked together in private, voluntary, industry-led collaborations to design protection measures: measures to keep unauthorized digital copies of works from being captured, so there would be nothing illicit to distribute on the Net. These can be industry standards -- as with the CSS encryption for DVDs -- or competing technological approaches to security, such as the differing digital rights management (DRM) systems of RealNetworks and Microsoft.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.5506
VADER
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0497609377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020326728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020024368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017567625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012085685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005988227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003039503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002551292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001779776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001422422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8236E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
48.864
Magnitude:
78
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
26.207
Magnitude:
78
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44

Justin Hughes

At times, these processes may not have produced the most consumer- friendly protection protocols. There are some people who believe that encryption systems like CSS impinge upon "fair uses" under copyright law (I will say more about that shortly) .
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.806
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0020787647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010979184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003522498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001784148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001648828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.38063E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2717E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.2587E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.531E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.02E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Justin Hughes

But at least these are not digital locks regimes designed by bureaucrats and enforced by diktat. The message now from some voices in the copyright community is that if the computer, electronics, and telecommunications companies are not cooperative enough in crafting a new round of standard control technologies, then the federal government should step in and mandate which particular security technologies must be deployed. The intent of some of these controls would -- like streaming technology or CSS -- be to prevent digital copies from being made by individuals. But unlike those existing digital locks, the design of future digital locks would be regulated by the government.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0656597782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0358492718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.007955404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0067053421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031162483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003600709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003066098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.8833E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9623E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5057E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.448E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
34.849
Magnitude:
98
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Justin Hughes

I think that would be a troubling development. Congress should be cautious in how much it is willing to defer to the policy decisions -- and legislative drafting -- of private parties. A member of the House is reported to have said that the House Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property "has a history of preferring that commercial disputes be resolved between the parties rather than through the legislative process, which may favor one interest group over another." 1 -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0341186678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0063095482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0041952768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0031314234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017357463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001164001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009093786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005929847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002137175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.13802E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.21981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Justin Hughes

1 . . . Irina Y. Dmitrieva, I Know It When I See It.: Should Internet Providers Recognize Copyright Violations? 16 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ. 233, 246.(2000), citing NII Copyright Protection Act of 1995: Hearings on H.R. 2441 Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Intellectual Property of the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 104th Cong., at 20 (1995) -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0055080291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0026674788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011631676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007613437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000557366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003513192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001654462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.37261E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.85268E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.8615E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.152E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.5
Gunning-Fog Score
3.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

That's all good and well, but this risks being private resolution blessed by the legislative or regulatory process without any way to be sure that the private discussions took account of all the relevant social interests. How digital copyrighted works are distributed and used is a matter of enormous interest to consumers too. Users of copyrighted works have distinct privileges in the balanced scheme of the copyright law -- fair use and the first sale doctrine chief among them. An "agreement . . . brokered through private, voluntary, industry-led negotiations, and then blessed by Congress" may fail to address those concerns. 2 -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.984
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0432753557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0431107037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004609771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037267542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008157488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000349331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002381636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.00022604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.71336E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.92113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.60745E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.4
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37

Justin Hughes

2 Testimony of Peter Chernin, President and CEO, News Corp., before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, February 28, 2002, at 6. - II. The Importance of Fair Use Codified in 1976, but tracing its roots in American law back to at least the 1840s,3 17 U.S.C. Sec. 107 fair use is about as far from a bright line test as statutory law should wander. There is no question that what counts as "fair use" has changed over time. As reproductive technologies became more and more widely available to end users in the second half of the 20th century, fair use expanded to include a certain, undetermined amount of "non-transformative" copying for personal, non-commercial uses. On the only occasion when the Supreme Court considered non-transformative, private copying, it concluded in the Sony v. Universal Studios case 4 that at least one form of such copying -- "time-shifting" to watch a broadcast show at another time -- was protected activity. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.974
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0138781485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0055177392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041739473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037820158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0027764014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015765338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009952932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003683725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002049707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43612E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.32235E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
67.1
Magnitude:
15
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
52
Sprache Difficult Word Count
56

Justin Hughes

3 In Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F. Cas. 342 (No. 4,901) (CCD Mass. 1841), Justice Story summarized earlier copyright cases in a distillation of "fair use" which sustained the judge-made doctrine until its 1976 codification: "look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work." Id., at 348. There were considerably earlier cases in England permitting "fair abridgements" under the Statute of Anne, see W. Patry, The Fair Use Privilege in Copyright Law 6-17 (1985).
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.26868
VADER
0.934
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0591141288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0271897326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0177149559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0067505607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026886048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009163737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007915398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.59876E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2401E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.92E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
36.504
Magnitude:
100
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
35.457
Magnitude:
100
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37

Justin Hughes

4 Sony Corp. of America v Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984). -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0841872999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0238753069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0215826949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.019033745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017744675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014642091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011852393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.38022E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4939E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2652E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.872E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.4
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
1
SMOG Index
7.7
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Justin Hughes

Let me say a few things about that Sony "Betamax" decision that one rarely hears.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0741641503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0489350059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0453575747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0140259799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0123000689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018758401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015935739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001678047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8624E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.1414E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.0232E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
61.98
Magnitude:
79
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Justin Hughes

First, despite the clamor of some of academics, the right to make near perfect or perfect non-transformative copies of pop culture works is not at the core of our democratic freedoms. 5 It isn't even at the core of fair use. Some people forget that the Betamax decision was a 5-4 vote and the dissent thought that (near) perfect, non-transformative copying of audiovisual works was NOT fair use. That dissent included Justices Blackmun and Marshall -- surely two of the last century's most vigorous defenders of free speech and all the values that make a civil democratic society worth living in. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.974
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0037519836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023508996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022196255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014560311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012318622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008361711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008256818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005257917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001094258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.26117E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.42
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

5 There is no reason to think that the Betamax majority's analysis would be any different between a near-perfect analog copy [as at issue] and a "perfect" digital copy. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0055278138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027205142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011471743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009207853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008070128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001892754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001667586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001438469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001214939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.73122E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.8393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.2
Gunning-Fog Score
18.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Justin Hughes

But, second, it's been a long time since the Betamax decision. Twenty years. A lot has changed in that time -- lots of the factors which built the slim, five member majority have changed. Yet the studios have never challenged the Betamax conclusion that making non-transformative copies for "time-shifting" (a personal, noncommercial use in the home) is fair use. A whole generation of consumers is now accustomed to a certain amount of personal copying being a protected, legal activity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.786
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.048733587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0360642967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0117588294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019629992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012855077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007356937
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003530793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002906289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000175425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001405057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.68312E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
33.556
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
27.789
Magnitude:
66
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Justin Hughes

I think it's worth mentioning what is now an open secret. People at home make copies of TV programs for more than "timeshifting." People build up libraries of their favorite series, they copy children's programs to play again and again for the kids; they even sometimes share these recorded programs on their clunky videocassettes with neighbors and colleagues. 6 [And this is often genuine "sharing" as we are taught the concept as children, not Napsteresque "sharing" in which a person gives without giving up anything.] -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0810580445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0176302623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005759576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008111501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007509298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007437662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002171431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002087226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000121862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.40788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.1304E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Justin Hughes

6 Just last month, I got an all-faculty email requesting a copy of a PBS documentary. The email read, in part, "I'm urgently trying to locate a videotape copy of the PBS Frontline documentary `Inside the Jury Room'. Is there anyone in the Law School who happens to have a copy that they can loan out for a few days? I just discovered that my copy has gone missing . . . ." Admittedly, this was for an educational purpose, but it is exemplary of how people exchange, lend, and share recorded audiovisual works within small circles of family, friends, and colleagues. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.747
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.056901417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0352264644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0237782137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027216765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015610434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009838694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008429477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000341726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003002098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001362228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.90199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
46.399
Magnitude:
107
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Justin Hughes

That's important for one simple reason -- courts have identified customary practices as being relevant in determining what "markets" copyright holders are entitled to and, in turn, what kinds of copying may be fair uses. 7 Consumers have become accustomed to making some limited amount of non-transformative copies for personal use. This applies to all sorts of copyrighted works and across all sorts of machines and appliances. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.74721
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0342967629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.028879306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.011994932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020349053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001248947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011432818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000931139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.49123E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.60821E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8645E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4183E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Justin Hughes

7 See, e.g. Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States, 487 F.2d 1345, 1381, et seq., (Ct. Cl. 1973) (recognizing customary practices in determining fair use of photocopying), aff'd by equally divided Court, 420 U.S. 376, 43 L. Ed. 2d 264, 95 S. Ct. 1344 (1975); New Era Publications Int'l v. Carol Pub. Group, 904 F.2d. 152, 157 (2d Cir. 1990) (discussing reasonable and customary practices of biographers in determining fair use); Maxtone-Graham v. Burtchaell, 808 F.2d 1253, 1263 (2d Cir, 1986) (same); Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 307 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009, 17 L. Ed. 2d 546, 87 S. Ct. 714 (1967)) (same). See also Lloyd L. Weinreb, Fair's Fair: A Comment on the Fair Use Doctrine, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1137, 1140 (1990) -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.972
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1991186291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.144550018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0229438432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0228396035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0196175359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0073429408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005366085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.00034078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001602241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001106725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.09229E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
59.96
Magnitude:
89
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
1.7
SMOG Index
7.1
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
51
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43

Justin Hughes

Having said that fair use has evolved in the past, the corollary is that we don't know where fair use will go in the digital future. But if we don't know where fair use will go, we definitely should not allow anyone to unilaterally determine that fair use should go away. There have always been a few people who, in Professor Brown's 1963 description, "treat fair use as though it were some grudging toleration of an annoying public." 8 That's wrong. Fair use and other limitations on the rights of copyright owners -- like the first sale doctrine -- are part and parcel of the social bargain of copyright. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.843
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1122190501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0151899862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053470932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014664392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014235485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006367481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004597583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004464813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001167775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.42292E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0011E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

8 Copyright Law Revision, Part 3 Preliminary Draft for Revised U.S. Copyright Law and Discussions and Comments on the Draft 171 (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964). -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.8532502688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1015269081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0675749441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0285738235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0223380572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072271359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0009870639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005251072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003198302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002362685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000184734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
39.08
Magnitude:
98
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.2
Gunning-Fog Score
5.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Justin Hughes

The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) 9 reflects reasonable concern for "fair use" in the digital, networked era. Section 1201(c)(1) expressly provides that the new law does not affect fair use under section 107 and the prohibition on "digital lock picking" in section 1201(a) does not extend to digital locks that control any rights or privileges of the copyright holder beyond "access" -- precisely because some unauthorized uses will be fair uses. Only time will tell whether this arrangement in the DMCA workably preserves fair use, but the intent is clear. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.64706
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.64706
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.42139
VADER
0.782
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.010582379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0077716133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037685433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013241411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006983282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005297422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004511342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003138303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002625464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.66283E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.92937E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

9 Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 (October 28,1998). -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.368
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0373391376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0061259248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022094799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001822643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015204114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001493669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001350976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.65165E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.33864E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.11597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5341E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.603
Magnitude:
137
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
0
SMOG Index
5.8
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Justin Hughes

In that same spirit, the European Union has also recognized the importance of preserving "personal uses" and "fair dealing" limitations and exceptions from copyright liability under various European laws. The European Union's new Copyright Directive takes a slightly different tack from the DMCA, but with the same intent: under Article 6(4) of the Directive, if a member state of the European Union determines that digital locks deployed by copyright owners are inhibiting consumers ability to enjoy certain "personal uses" (what we would call fair uses), that country may take "appropriate measures" to ensure such uses are available to consumers. 10 -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.93827
VADER
0.952
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1566439052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1037643524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0223636307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0101783364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0046968195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022490169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011443703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000834908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006282445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.51368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.98925E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Justin Hughes

10 Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society., Chapter III, Article 6(4). -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0434140617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0287423783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0085584805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022727598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016195796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013018706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009531737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001383924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001017659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.96401E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4102E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.876
Magnitude:
122
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Justin Hughes

The smartest people in the audiovisual industry realize this too -- that a certain amount of non-commercial, personal copying definitely does not harm and may even benefit their businesses. III. Forcing Us To Define How Much Use Is Fair Use For this reason, if there has to be any regulatory structure imposed on digital, networked systems to protect copyrighted works, it should be one that focuses on stopping unauthorized distribution over the Internet and leaves alone what some people have called the "home net" -- the integrated system of personal computers, display devices, and audio equipment that private homes will increasingly have. 11 The focus should be on technology that addresses commercial and commerce-substituting broadband distribution, not on technology that could be used to stop Aunt Mary from copying her favorite soap opera for herself or a friend. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm
0.1007309998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0688330212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.058603019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0384776708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047346031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026007083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015470619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005426792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003821973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000179842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.46267E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.308
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
50

Justin Hughes

11 I think that Thomson Multimedia characterized this goal in similar terms, as "full functionality in a Personal Home Network" while gaining "protection of digital content from widespread piracy." Testimony of James E. Meyer, Senior Vice President, Thomson Multimedia, before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, February 28, 2002, at 2. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.422
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.061841245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0104851482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0046284218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0041309155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036971538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024287707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001359301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011631088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008193813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003032881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.23688E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Justin Hughes

More importantly, if the copyright industries want particular security technologies mandated by law, then instead of pursuing private, industry negotiations, we should all be prepared to sit down and do what we have not been willing to do in this country: establish exactly how much unauthorized, personal use is fair use. Perhaps additional security protocols like broadcast flags and watermarking might be legally mandated at least for some machines and appliances if the content community is willing to accept a limited, defined zone of personal, private, unauthorized use of copyrighted works. That would be a system in which we defined a minimum amount of copying a private individual would be allowed to do for herself, her family, and her immediate social circle.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.78947
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.78947
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.926
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0083267842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034679502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0019080326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003538293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0002355526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001995228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001208447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001138168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.56685E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3876E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1361E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
46.845
Magnitude:
64
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38

Justin Hughes

This could be a kind of Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA) 12 writ large -- covering more appliances and broadly extending its basic ideas, including the recognition that consumers can make some digital copies for personal uses. There is, of course, an important lesson in the AHRA: Congress legislated, but the market decided to go another direction and the statutory technological mandate was a technological dead-end. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.103
Leans Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0298387429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041135358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0025195512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00165111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013408436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004407783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004021771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002433462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002387717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.65978E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.24428E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.779
Magnitude:
68
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
20.656
Magnitude:
68
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Justin Hughes

12 17 U.S.C. Sec. 1001, et seq. - IV. A Sea Change From the DMCA Which brings me to a final, couple, broad concerns. While today's hearing is intended to be a general discussion of these issues, Senators Hollings and Stevens have recently proposed legislation on this topic, the Security Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA). We might as well talk about this, because we all know nothing focuses a lobbyist, legislator, or staffer's attention in DC like a draft bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.025049274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0208897036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083061481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031852513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026926768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001247333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.60651E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.44368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.7879E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2679E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.481E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33

Justin Hughes

In at least one version, the SSSCA would require the specification of "certified security technologies," either by an industry-only forum or by the Secretary of Commerce. In either case, the particular security technologies would be specified in law (regulation) and all "interactive digital devices" would be required to include such security technology -- all to the goal of preventing the making of digital copies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0131990615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0110550856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0102499835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022448643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009412608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004429603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002717361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001373355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.63822E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4291E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.179E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
36.285
Magnitude:
68
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
10.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Justin Hughes

As best as I can tell, the SSSCA's sweeping definitions would require specified technology to be built into every piece of software; PC, video card, hard drive, CPU, motherboard; PDA; DVD or CD player; and every monitor manufactured or distributed in our country. 13 The security technology would be specified in a process that apparently has little or no safeguards for the traditional balance of copyright rights and privileges. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.84
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0833160884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0248302764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0236265972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0062851796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025719743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0017437465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015081267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000944072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002895729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.25345E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0273E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Justin Hughes

13 Although the definition of "interactive digital device" in the SSSCA would appear to sweep in electronic keyboards, wristwatches, airplane control systems, and new generations of toasters, microwaves, telephones, and vacuum cleaners, the intent may be more limited, i.e. that security standards would be "mandated for inclusion in all digital media devices that handle creative content." Testimony of Michael D. Eisner, Chairman and CEO, The Walt Disney Company, before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, February 28, 2002, at 3. Of course, that does not tell us whether it is devices intended to handle creative content or capable of handling creative content -- which will someday, if not already, include your wristwatch and maybe your toaster. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.45199
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.889
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0090776681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032118769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022244551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013810925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007909316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007099993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006531855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002279741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.11717E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.02738E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0027E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.26
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
53
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45

Justin Hughes

Moreover, the government's best intellectual property, information policy, and competition experts -- at the USPTO, the Copyright Office, the Justice Department, and the science agencies -- don't have a leading role in the "specification" process. It's hard to understand this. I think Congress ought to rely more on the expertise it pays for every year and less on the "experts" to be found at so many Washington fundraisers. 14 -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.889
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1287366846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.014891215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0068876936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0058764672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029842218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0028035929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021435339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011462097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005676704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001176293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.72313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
71.193
Magnitude:
131
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Justin Hughes

14 In fact, prior legislative efforts have consistently recognized that the quickly evolving nature of the Internet requires continued monitoring by experts and Congress has wisely chosen to defer decision or keep issues open by mandating studies in expert agencies. The DMCA includes a series of such studies by the Department of Commerce and the Copyright Office. The Hatch-Leahy distance education bill (S. 487) passed the Senate last year with a required report from the USPTO on the efficacy and effects of technological protection measures for copyrighted works in use or development. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0127420208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054404627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002881386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0026627109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012205438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006103434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004434574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001260409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001229577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.93994E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.03914E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35
Gunning-Fog Score
15.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45

Justin Hughes

But more importantly, the SSSCA or anything like it would represent a dramatic reversal of Congress' approach to the digital world. To date, Congress has wisely understood that the government should not try to pick technological "winners" and "losers." Government should stay out of the business of imposing technological solutions to problems which move much faster than bills through Congress or regulations through the Federal Register.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.633
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0156195936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0078896315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016674827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005062662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004995151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.59689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.34383E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.99876E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.21012E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5874E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2311E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
45.828
Magnitude:
80
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Justin Hughes

In that spirit, the DMCA wisely includes a "no mandates" provision, making clear that consumer electronics, computer, and telecommunications equipment systems do not have to be designed to respond to any particular technological measure. 15 The development of effective technological protection measures and their successful deployment was left up to the private sector. Congress' thoughtful effort to stop government from picking technological winners has extended far beyond intellectual property. For example, the E- Signatures bill, the work of the Judiciary and Commerce committees in both houses, is technologically neutral. It does not pre-empt states passing their own electronic signatures legislation, except that pursuant to section 102(a)(2)(A), the federal law does pre-empt any state government that tries to pick a particular technological solution to the problem of electronic signatures, documents, and recordkeeping. -
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.41176
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.41176
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.82098
VADER
0.953
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0273189798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0071102688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046216686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022981949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012182889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007219054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006963392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002183875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.40908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.22776E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8686E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.745
Magnitude:
95
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
58
Sprache Difficult Word Count
56

Justin Hughes

15 17 U.S.C. Sec. 1201(c)(3). The only technological mandate in the DMCA concerns deployment of "Macrovision" technology for a legacy technology -- analog video recordings. - V. How Would We Explain This Around the World? I have another concern about such a quick revisiting of the issue of technological protection measures -- just months after some of the key provisions of the DMCA have come online.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.003156994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028062868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017325117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004140565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001922833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001368345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.44988E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.77302E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.74998E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.49803E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.769E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
52.92
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
10.4
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Justin Hughes

Since the ratification of the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Phonograms and Performances Treaty (WPPT) in 1996, the United States has been at the forefront in advocating that countries ratify these international agreements and implement them through strengthening and improvement of domestic copyright legislation. Since the passage of the DMCA, the U.S. Government has held up the DMCA's balanced, hands- off approach as a model for how countries should implement international copyright norms for the digital, networked age.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.878
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0068019523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016239239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014205554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011634384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004306466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003182605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.60882E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.14238E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.03573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.4308E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.581E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
45.612
Magnitude:
113
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
20.366
Magnitude:
113
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31

Justin Hughes

If we suddenly do a volte-face and decide that government must mandate the particular security devices and protocols needed to protect copyright works, it gets considerably harder to tell other countries that we know what we're doing. Frankly, such a policy change could make us look a little clueless. Having been in many of these conferences, discussions, and negotiations, I can easily imagine a savvy technocrat from another country noting such a change in U.S. policy and asking hard questions about American understanding of this Internet phenomenon, this digital universe of our own creation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.27297
VADER
0.706
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0062917214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045549343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031588461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025633528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017750717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003246252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.39619E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.8675E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.165E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.994E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.424E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Justin Hughes

In short, there may be international reasons for such a change in policy to be a last option. Conclusion There are tough decisions to be made in copyright policy. And those decisions may not be too far down the road. How the first sale doctrine survives in a digital world, how fair use evolves, how geography-based arrangements for royalties are transmuted into the Internet -- all these issues are as important as they are fascinating.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0246401469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0069092181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034851499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032251271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012387185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004689975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001715653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.50333E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.44715E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.54045E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.52797E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
59.968
Magnitude:
47
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Justin Hughes

Many of the people in this room remember the hearing on Napster and other peer-to-peer file sharing systems which this committee held in 2000. At that hearing, Chairman Hatch posed a couple hypotheticals to Hillary Rosen, head of the RIAA. Chairman Hatch asked, if he made a tape copy of a CD to play in his car, whether or not that would be a fair use. He then asked if he made a copy of a CD for his wife to play in her car -- would that be a fair use? Ms. Rosen demurred from giving a direct answer to Senator Hatch's questions and -- given her job -- I completely understand that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.912
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0473470776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.023749168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0070839611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0068063448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0032632361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016512373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012143393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007564158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000325618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.63495E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.55411E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Justin Hughes

But let me answer those questions, a couple years late. Are those fair uses? My very theoretical, law professor answer is this: if the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the ranking minority member think something is a fair use, it is probably a fair use or soon will be.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0260822271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0155250222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029345243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028458224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017332684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011509932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010648144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.29958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.56071E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.10433E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.0031E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
80.769
Magnitude:
16
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Justin Hughes

And I close there for a very simple reason -- whatever legislation is introduced in other quarters, whatever negotiations are conducted privately, this committee should not abdicate its traditional job in deciding the proper balance in copyright law of the interests of creators, distributors, consumers, and citizens.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0993299065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0081832659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0049602259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030365876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024708857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006284494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000252684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000237106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001831281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.1798E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.01773E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Justin Hughes

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.207992224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0188700462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047019061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002850682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011551278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008497762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002703873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002575838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001719027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.4115E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.716E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

No legislation will pass this year until we have had a chance to look at it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.052
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.135779893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0388915534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0299325126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0219487862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0176139321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0083142477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006828474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002633064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.74142E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.60355E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.01703E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
88.379
Magnitude:
50
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

I promised the Senator from California, who is trying to juggle two different matters, that I would let her go first for questioning. Then, unless the ranking member has come back, we will go to Senator Specter.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0805974996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0105098232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0081617953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047651418
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030823681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012038568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009537238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.6486E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2786E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.215E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Dianne Feinstein

Thanks very much, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate that. I would like to just make a couple of informal comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0078207479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049238661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047166723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012558348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000895234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001449699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000124252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.44421E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.70572E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.21188E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0194E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
36.717
Magnitude:
117
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
26.266
Magnitude:
117
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Dianne Feinstein

This is an issue which impacts California dramatically. We have a large IT industry. Mr. Barrett spoke on behalf of the computer industry. We have a very large entertainment industry. We have a very large biotech industry, pharmaceutical industry, all of which are really based on copyright and patent protection.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.473
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0139383585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0103237391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.008633393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0033737739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023372455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007832969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006464985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005749769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003333055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000237253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002074786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
44.741
Magnitude:
67
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Dianne Feinstein

That is really where this country, as I see it, has made its mark in the world. We have been on the innovative edge of new discoveries constantly, and these new discoveries have been protected by both copyrights and patents.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.7
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0308457733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.016616263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031517477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009062601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002703798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001887195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001756975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001422974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.69031E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.15402E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.26119E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
62.073
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.8
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Dianne Feinstein

In the 10 years I have been on this committee, I see this as perhaps the most serious infringement on copyright protection that I have seen and I want to just very briefly explain why, because unless something is done cooperatively and inclusively of all of the industries involved, I think we are going to be forced to simply watch the massive theft of copyrighted works of all kinds all around the world until the thrust to really create disappears. I think it is that serious a situation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.805
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0209050864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0097835124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0052180167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028626058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003536818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000305011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.91687E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.00869E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.48361E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.447E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.4279E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
45.325
Magnitude:
50
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Dianne Feinstein

Over the past weekend, my chief counsel went online to verify the statements made to us about how easy it is to get copyright material on the Internet, and he did verify it. This is a ten-cent CD-ROM containing a full-length version of the movie "Shrek," downloaded using the file-sharing program Morpheus. "Shrek" was just released on DVD last November. It is running on HBO right now. It quickly became the best-selling DVD of all time, but apparently someone on the Internet was able to defeat the copy protection on the DVD and put the movie online because my staff was able to download a perfect copy of "Shrek" for free in just a few short hours.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.815
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0089366462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054385644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050515449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010213706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009890766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009795348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.1981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.68248E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6503E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3282E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.152E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
41.013
Magnitude:
80
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
30.842
Magnitude:
80
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Dianne Feinstein

As an example that is even more problematic, my staff was even able to download a full-length copy of "A Beautiful Mind." This is a movie up to Best Picture of the Year. It is still in theaters. It is not even out on video yet, but he was able to get it for free and download it in two-and-a-half hours using the file-sharing program G Nucleus.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.814
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0162065742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0125791543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0097392236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0077771962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0070997528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019372736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006147926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003470876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.73497E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.35187E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Dianne Feinstein

So as I see it, Mr. Chairman, this is Napster times ten because nobody can shut these services down. The software operates in a decentralized way and the content resides and passes not through one central server, but everywhere on the Internet. These file-sharing services have already had an impact on the music industry, allowing by some accounts the illegal download of billions of music files every month, and widespread movie piracy is just around the corner.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.71
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0587179966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0472927932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0060453516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0056213848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036303976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0030568855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021533191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004592649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003634259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002948596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002056421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.711
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Dianne Feinstein

Now, that is the bad news. The good news is this: I have had a chance to talk to two people. One of them has Mr. Valenti, who has indicated his industry's concern. The other is yesterday Mr. Barrett was nice enough to come in and share his industry's concern.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0080240432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0059696911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016170501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014788063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005538381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003197344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002956266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.93143E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.60567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.718E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0184E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
58.731
Magnitude:
73
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
21.211
Magnitude:
73
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85
Gunning-Fog Score
7.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
8.5
Automated Readability Index
1.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Dianne Feinstein

The good news here is that both parties, as I see it, are willing to sit down and try to work out some protection measure, which I think can certainly be done technologically, to protect copyright. I think this is extraordinarily important because I think it is really related to the creative strength of this Nation. And if the creative strength of the Nation can't be protected by legal tools developed just for that purpose, then really where are we?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.97
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0078218363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028392789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006993912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002107274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.30659E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.72947E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3307E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.8013E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4872E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4785E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.164E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.276
Magnitude:
96
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Dianne Feinstein

So I want to ask my first question, if I might, to Mr. Barrett. Mr. Barrett, how much time do you think it will take, assuming parties are well-meaning and assuming you can sit down at a table and you can work something out?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.505
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2751111519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1716097468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0754345965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0206984361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0097611926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0089426219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0036057827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003718066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.49113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.9623E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.99471E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.085
Magnitude:
3
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.3
Gunning-Fog Score
7.2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Craig Barrett

Well, Senator, over the last six years a number of solutions have been worked out, as I think you know, in terms of DVDs and audio and pre-recorded content. We are coming up with solutions for digital TV terrestrial broadcasts, the analog hole.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0068640104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036854814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033174245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007055627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003046101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.17144E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.33192E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.921E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.6136E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.119E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.318E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.29
Magnitude:
12
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Craig Barrett

The peer-to-peer issue is a difficult issue. I think there is no silver bullet. I think there will be a combination solution which includes most probably legal solutions such as shutting down unauthorized distributors, technical solutions such as watermarks protecting at the source, business solutions such as offering content through business operations, such as Intertainer and others, at reasonable prices that consumers are willing to pay, and most probably some targeted legislative solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.472
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0254598534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028066426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020737691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015713042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006808368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002640135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.8133E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.5503E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.37E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.45E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.16E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
59.315
Magnitude:
16
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Craig Barrett

The difficulty, as I explained to you when we met privately, is, in fact, that once "in the free" digital content is on the Net, it is very difficult to differentiate it from legal content on the Net; that is, to differentiate between a home video and "Lord of the Rings" in terms of streaming bit count is very, very difficult. That is the problem that needs to be solved and that is why there is no silver bullet. That is why I think it will be a combination of legal, business, technology and legislative solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.1431
VADER
-0.613
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0137261944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0122812344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0090594469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027689897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022891436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015096692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010490653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000269401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.07908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.89686E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.04714E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.165
Magnitude:
55
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51
Gunning-Fog Score
17.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Dianne Feinstein

Streaming bit count?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0003234768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001739579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001272482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
4.8987E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
4.86445E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.0074E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.8803E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.4568E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.2927E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.71E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.855E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.531
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Craig Barrett

Well, streaming bits; that is what the Internet is, ones and zeroes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.009414446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040571471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014727179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012556827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003088475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.59661E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.74499E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.36825E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.3799E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7905E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1044E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
64.302
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.9
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Dianne Feinstein

So what you are saying is there is a partial solution, but not an entire solution?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.02
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.006076974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028405273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024235025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019664316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003761105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001217142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.5728E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.46235E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.62323E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8459E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4624E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Craig Barrett

Well, there is no solution today -- first of all, I believe there has been no solution suggested by the content industry. If it had, it would have come to the Content Protection Technical Working Group. No proposed solution has come from that body. We would certainly be willing to look at a proposed solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.04452
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0054941484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045176879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037478749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009507081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005060991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000219983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001599398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.10414E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.08719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.7576E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6039E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Craig Barrett

The solutions that have been made in public but not taken to the Technical Working Group involve such things as monitoring all Internet content flow. In my opinion, that is the analogy to wiretapping all Internet communications. Especially in front of this committee, I don't think that it would find much approval, and certainly amongst the privacy constituents I think it would not find much approval.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.77
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
1.0485680774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0158604002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0144801481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0048202935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032327636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018966757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0012122497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009970106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002945864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.11462E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.40339E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Craig Barrett

The other one is the situation that I mentioned earlier, which is to compare all bit streaming, assuming you ignore the privacy aspect, with a database of all copyrighted content, basically having a fingerprint of all copyrighted content and looking at every Internet message to see if it contains that fingerprint. I don't even know how to do that technically, let alone overcome the privacy issues.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0152633933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0055939363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043474814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017634782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015467949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005785444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005472783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004852103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004277617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003372372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.71688E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Jonathan Taplin

Senator Feinstein, if I could just --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.034895257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0344074884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0296986225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0161367832
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0143998186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0042102904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008914071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000429801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003777301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003167097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001659589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.8
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Dianne Feinstein

My time is up.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0152717213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0128624873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.010639985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0049746501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021496568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005184242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002989493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.89138E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.66853E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.43201E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.517E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
42.844
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
0
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

Go ahead.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0378484168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0069738635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065734501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036261554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017538465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008250844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000765403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000225845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.67139E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.4573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.27523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.695
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Jonathan Taplin

Can I just address the one issue about "A Beautiful Mind?"
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0500901777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002040459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020208226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017664155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012040727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005998155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003055642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002506569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001799145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001425733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8216E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
65.574
Magnitude:
38
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.6
Gunning-Fog Score
4.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Dianne Feinstein

Yes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0212193452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0190948398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0131850742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038862192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034727058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027679254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0013659402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002889842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001412443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.16652E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8416E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.36
Magnitude:
71
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Jonathan Taplin

Obviously, since that is a movie that has not been put on a DVD, so it is not commercially available, the only way that movie could have gotten in such a perfect form on the Internet is that someone stole it from a post-production house, which means that the movie studios themselves are being sloppy with their own protection of their content in the post- production process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1606709324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1169218449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0489420258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0448737585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.029971177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.017747737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0078990197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0037331996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008213897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004046527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003335309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
31.775
Magnitude:
46
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Jonathan Taplin

It means that someone took an output from a digital editing station or something like that, some assistant editor, and took it home and put it on the Internet. That is not an issue that any of these things that are being talked about would address. That is someone who stole a perfect digital copy from inside the movie studio and got it out there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0318608276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0108696579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0049744838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036483616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024091603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014912589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009777112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008854348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004325841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.26667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
93.818
Magnitude:
21
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Dianne Feinstein

But then that is another problem because I think the movie companies can certainly protect themselves. On the other hand, the incentive then grows to steal this and to put it out on the Internet to make money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Hate
0.0224138392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.011181632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.010706771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002941773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027284908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022466054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003526314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002724931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57903E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0736E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.8356E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.29
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Jonathan Taplin

If we had access to very larger libraries of content and could sell them for a reasonable price, which we are doing, I think the general consumer does not want to go to an illegally pirated site. And if you think about a combination of allowing much more content to come out legally with digital rights management technologies, we have been running for three years and have never been hacked, ever.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.205
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0016371958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014352292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006964096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000566444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003798647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003307101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001478127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.58575E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.82811E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.3008E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.34E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

If you put them out, the average consumer doesn't want to be a pirate, and then perhaps a little consumer education -- i.e., Don Henley or a few artists saying, hey, you are stealing my work if you are going to KazAA -- might help.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.27
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0223381838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0164219266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.008374155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041255611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014809542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003839885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001838976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.02733E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.3244E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.93E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.981E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.7
Gunning-Fog Score
9.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
4.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Dianne Feinstein

I hope you are right about the average consumer. I am not so sure, though. But in any event, thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.6096673906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2598098246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1981028821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052953947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019342109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013562117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001094106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.92242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.09089E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3767E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.286E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.9
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Craig Barrett

My point was very much that it is a combination of a business solution, technology solution, and legal solution. I think all of those things have to work in tandem to protect the free content that makes its way to the Internet, whether it makes it from copying off a DVD or it makes it being stolen from a studio.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2427718835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1353881904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0436706585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030786196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012342987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002631127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001959475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.62833E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.164E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7526E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0691E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Dianne Feinstein

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Barrett. I appreciate the opportunity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0955763739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0346528017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0038793729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024855552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012498585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010582474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009464555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003331472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001142808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.18809E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4739E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.3
Gunning-Fog Score
7.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
6.9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Patrick Leahy

I thank the Senator from California. I know about the conflict she had today and I appreciate the amount of time she spent here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1098291483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0251554215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.011130685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0093295086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016091062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001303405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001999167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001149524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.33637E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.13531E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7448E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.636
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.2
Gunning-Fog Score
6.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Patrick Leahy

I turn to the senior Senator from Pennsylvania.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.112142053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.106331741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0299742329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0069024813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0066339933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0032052463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014351566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002386269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001870308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001350975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001066397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.626
Magnitude:
102
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
5.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

STATEMENT OF HON. ARLEN SPECTER, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.123081659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0885041722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0336452038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083188082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0078347439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028268183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0027387752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007377756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001122525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.67664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.307E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
35.708
Magnitude:
30
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.9
Gunning-Fog Score
4.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
6.1
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Arlen Specter

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0787686557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0334171549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0238690278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0089035231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000207496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002022235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001284543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001107901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.01883E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.5192E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.653E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.344
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Arlen Specter

There is no doubt that we ought to do everything we can to protect intellectual property rights. When Mr. Barrett testifies that high-tech is losing $12 billion a year, the thought crosses my mind what can be done to protect high-tech's copyrights. And when we talk about $2.5 billion in losses for content from entertainment, that is a staggering figure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2236825647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0318875973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0073666401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052995521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003060059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016924916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010391112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007546269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.58926E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.94543E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.0077E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.254
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Arlen Specter

In reviewing the issues before this hearing, I am somewhat at a loss to figure out what this committee can do to make a constructive contribution. The legislation which is being circulated would require computer and consumer electronics manufacturers to embed copyright protection technology in all digital devices, from computers to compact disc players to video players. But the problem that I have is what does technology offer to meet that standard. As I review the literature, there are some technological devices, but as Mr. Barrett points out, if it is on the Internet there is nothing that has yet been devised.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
-0.332
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0738324772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0223918149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0083039784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0054000269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020842197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018357347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003375542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.83601E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.83974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.61523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.1306E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
54.727
Magnitude:
46
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
21.104
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Arlen Specter

So what is the point, starting with you, Mr. Barrett, for Congress to get into this thicket and to require technology to solve a problem when the technology doesn't exist?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
-0.226
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0051902847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045822337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011301983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000606123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003329496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002351127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.86727E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.86527E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.83971E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.7968E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5789E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
73.588
Magnitude:
53
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Craig Barrett

Well, I have a similar problem with that proposal that you read. I think that was from Senator Hollings' bill, or proposed bill. I don't think the technology exists to differentiate between lawful content, legally-produced home video, audio, what have you, and pirated content; that is, content which is not protected at the source such as we were just talking about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
-0.286
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.003259709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020844564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011640566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001004743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.45646E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.43754E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.9283E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.3726E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8432E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4456E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.691E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
44.377
Magnitude:
28
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Craig Barrett

To differentiate between those on the Internet, you either have to outlaw legal content such that you could try to track down all content and do something with it, or you have to do the fingerprint analogy that I was mentioning. You would have to monitor all Internet communications and, on the fly, try to match content to see if it is copyrighted and unprotected and should not be allowed to pass.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1999315107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.035735761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0151141343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0058450965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0030291227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023902279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020171472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005388665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001206417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.83601E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.84641E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
32.541
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
25.347
Magnitude:
59
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Arlen Specter

Well, this hearing brings to my mind a hearing we had about 20 years ago on VCRs. I reminisced with Senator Biden. When he chaired the committee -- I think it was about 1982 -- we were worried about what we were going to do there. We were going to have VCRs which didn't pick up the commercials and there were all sorts of concerns.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1946302247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0471297244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0334011012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.032469671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0033872526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028423077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019777612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.45772E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.82787E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9173E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.864
Magnitude:
47
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Arlen Specter

I want to direct this question to you, Mr. Kraus, representing consumers here. As concerned as we are with intellectual property rights in the movie industry and high- tech, we are perhaps even more concerned with the consumers. There are certainly more voters among the consumers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9781395569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7100218683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4066372067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9470939636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9110790677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6569254678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2249140525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1443920308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1300290925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0911959214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0490104663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.651
Magnitude:
61
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Arlen Specter

If we can develop technology which would meet this standard to have computer and consumer electronics manufacturers embed copyright protection technology in all digital devices, is it within the realm of technical possibility to have the technology such that it accomplishes that but allows consumers to use it for their own private purposes?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.214
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0206581753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0159378076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0132177898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0058814345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018244933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016909171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003482178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.53973E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.5001E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.0591E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.4235E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.347
Magnitude:
48
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

That is a good question. I don't know the answer directly because I am not familiar with the entire spate of technological solutions that are all being proposed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3162062727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1239653095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0239472589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0137206589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0089327608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0023602466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006727092
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000377652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002729606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001758853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4195E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.419
Magnitude:
48
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Joe Kraus

What I would advocate generally, though, is that we need to clearly define a set of consumer rights and then let the market adjudicate and decide what solutions best respect consumers' rights and copyright-holders' rights. Currently, consumers' rights aren't well enough defined to allow, I believe, the market to work successfully to develop technologies which respect both parties' rights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.965
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0049892871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042550011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0035877412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012985019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006800646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003936093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000164499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001554169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.96287E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.1985E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6968E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
48.002
Magnitude:
74
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

So that is what I happen to believe is an appropriate solution, is adequately defining consumers' rights. We already have adequate definitions of what the content owners' rights are. With those two rights in place, I believe the market will find technological solutions that can respect them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.13549
VADER
0.791
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2162748715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0606976682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0496072113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0418824813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028113252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007214574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006282727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.86785E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.47242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.6604E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.408E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
45.865
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Joe Kraus

I wanted to also touch on the notion that the software industry has seen this movie before. As you have reflected on the VCR, you have seen this movie before. The software industry has been dealing with piracy for a very long period of time. As Mr. Barrett pointed out, $12.5 billion is lost to piracy per year in the software industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0263729919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0255992025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.019892292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0088525747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028161821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008146674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000291843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.17938E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.03974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.68305E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.65282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Joe Kraus

In the mid-1980s, the software industry decided to impose strict copy controls on most software packages. What happened? It isolated and alienated paying customers. It didn't stop piracy. It actually made the paying customers more angry, and I would say we are currently seeing that movie again.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.20067
VADER
-0.773
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0089734342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040455416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009126888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001112037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.8724E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.76953E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
5.52434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.2871E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.617E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.3176E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.695E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Joe Kraus

We are implementing copy protection controls on consumer media, for which I understand the motivation, but in the end we are alienating the actual customers who then pay for that media and not actually having the impact on piracy that I think we would all like to see.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.519
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0069045018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0031130374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023494293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0022500082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001463211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006550824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006282091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002646232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001274101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.85983E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.8909E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
15.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Arlen Specter

Let me come back to the legislation which is currently being circulated. I would be glad to get behind any legislation which would protect intellectual property rights. I am all for it, but the proposal to have the Secretary of Commerce come in, if there cannot be agreement among the parties to these kinds of controversies, really raises a question in my mind. Very frequently, the Congress does its best when it does nothing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.54654
VADER
0.924
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0078694873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032105909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014217914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013783492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003039509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.34552E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.81303E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4305E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.8738E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1271E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.064E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
47.344
Magnitude:
19
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Arlen Specter

Are we better off if we let the market work through and let the market seek the technological devices? If the market comes up with them, then there may be some inclination on the part of the parties themselves to resolve it. Very frequently, when we get into it, we cause more problems than we solve.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.722
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0117051422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0098655699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004522594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004219722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.3717E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.22841E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.44174E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.3883E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.7624E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5225E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.111E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
96.41
Magnitude:
35
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Arlen Specter

Mr. Parsons, you have had a chance to catch your breath. What do you think?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1068089507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0067810462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065981258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008082529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007991802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007488429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002961765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001132463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.487E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.41459E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.3053E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
90.163
Magnitude:
19
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Richard Parsons

Well, Senator, first of all let me start as I frequently find myself with my wife having to start, with an apology, and that is for being late to this hearing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0126089362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098647601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00048163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003656428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002849172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001888122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001612984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.82451E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.33352E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.5133E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.534E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Arlen Specter

Mr. Parsons, we understand you came by air. If you had been on Amtrak, you would have been here on time.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0628815789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0377764838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.033879574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.004374655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007685475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006537089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005723143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.96443E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6586E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3564E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2628E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
91.924
Magnitude:
113
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99
Gunning-Fog Score
4.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Richard Parsons

If I had walked, I would have been here closer to the time than coming by air this morning.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0451439264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0391674053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0136175717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0085635991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0045873447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040833474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016358474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007113602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001040102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.9349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.303E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
77.447
Magnitude:
87
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

I would tell the Senator from Pennsylvania and the Senator from Delaware, who are both strong supporters, as they should be, of Amtrak, that I had already put in a plug for Amtrak even earlier.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0193527885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0168692466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.014747915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0118791933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.003156723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011078429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009776543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001332053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.37047E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.5877E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.41E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
88.532
Magnitude:
34
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Arlen Specter

We may have some problems with the Hollings bill, but we have no problem with funding Amtrak, Mr. Parsons. [Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
-0.802
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.2481236588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2248232253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1541223726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0455341069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0358937948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028167515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015460768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010137084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.24589E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.98368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.50725E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
70.946
Magnitude:
30
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.9
Gunning-Fog Score
3.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Richard Parsons

I think the proper response is message received.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.006384655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0059179642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0055858658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029605446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018807552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006491223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.91197E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.82268E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.37444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.35095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.9881E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
49.359
Magnitude:
62
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Richard Parsons

I think, Senator, that the question you are raising about whether there is a helpful and useful role for the Congress here is the right one. Our view -- and if I am going to be permitted in a minute to give my statement, I will expand on this a bit, but our view is that this is primarily an area that should be worked out in the marketplace; that the entertainment industry, the information technology industry, the consumer electronics industry and the software industry have got to get our act together and we have got to work hard to deal with these problems because it requires that degree of suppleness and flexibility.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
0.731
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0032985597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009553861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005788595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002985932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001345381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.71681E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.80171E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.97375E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.53603E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.8359E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.3727E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Richard Parsons

There are, we believe, a few areas where discreet, incisive help from the Government in the form of taking -- we can take the ball to the five-yard line in some instances, and I will explain a little bit more of that in a minute, and to get it over the goal line we may need some help from the Government. But I don't think that this is a situation where government action should try, with a sword as opposed to a scalpel, to administer the surgery.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.7137883455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1069929218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0202794487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0081903861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036257923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0010400234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000388466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001532562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.43393E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.5049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.4262E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Richard Parsons

I think we have work to do. We are doing a lot of work right now on a cross-industry basis, but there are a few discreet areas where some governmental assistance could prove helpful.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0048738006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011559676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009322702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0005057894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004283451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003934066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003024732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001490963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001452204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.85482E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.4694E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Arlen Specter

Well, thank you, Mr. Parsons. We are ready, willing and able to help out, but I think we have to know what the technology is if we are to legislate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0017290191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015966039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014797599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004820321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001443197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.62581E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.75204E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.40296E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.72248E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.0386E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6966E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
1.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Arlen Specter

I would like to come back later, Mr. Barrett, to this issue of the $12 billion which high-tech is losing. That is an intolerable situation. We want to protect your property interests so that you can continue to produce, and I think that if we can find the technology Mr. Kraus suggests we may be able to protect the consumer interests as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0138236952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053746888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0050470717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026005053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0021385376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005235087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003598893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.55762E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.06788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.43501E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.37974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Arlen Specter

Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.646
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0167523132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0143267796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0069564951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0055767432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0052330859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004875313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002547086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.47618E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.95387E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.4671E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8064E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
98.4
Gunning-Fog Score
1.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.05450194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0275522005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0093911338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0073240662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010967778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005586612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004114047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001560288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.31969E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.7287E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7674E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

I know Senator Biden wants to leave. Do you want to say something?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual > Minors
0.0060798317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0046386816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043606062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.003773535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008952434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005773913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0005583081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000123048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.68347E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.19936E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.541E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.234
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.1
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Joe Biden

Sixty seconds.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0528533303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.016408466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0123806618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0111386813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0060528793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001502932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012370162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008272368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006885595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003125921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.35278E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
88.707
Magnitude:
78
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Patrick Leahy

Sure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0241302274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0129836058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0129583248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074375079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003844441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001291975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011332429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008614509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006477741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003530698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.18901E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
96.369
Magnitude:
117
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

STATEMENT OF HON. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.406455528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1615390531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.030502741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0257286418
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0127892155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017968827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002107196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002068541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002018035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.38134E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.65069E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
87.5
Gunning-Fog Score
3.9
Coleman-Liau Index
4.5
SMOG Index
5.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Joe Biden

I want to explain that I promised the National Conference of Mayors I would meet with them at 11:30, and I will try to come back and I would ask that my questions be submitted to the panel if I am not back and just state that it seems to me there is a philosophical divide here. I want to make sure I understand it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0470702566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0140162869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.012474136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043686643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018205099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004293708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003301271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002513547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001978291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001553474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.46359E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Joe Biden

It is one thing for us to be in a position where we make a distinction between what is inappropriately and illegally copied and what is legally and appropriately copied. That is a heck of a dilemma, but also in the case that we were faced with in the bad old days when I was chairman it was about whether or not we were going to force the consumer to have to listen to something, force them to listen to ads.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.71
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.1091458718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.086884317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0247174175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0091324458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.007431319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0043965869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.004351998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.78349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.39687E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.81138E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.15755E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Joe Biden

This is about balancing equities here, consumers versus what is obviously an aggrieved party here. Whose responsibility it is remains to be seen, but I suspect -- just so you know, we do have laws. If you all in the software industry and the computer industry were to manufacture those little wands and you could go up to the Texaco station and illegally get gas out at two o'clock in the morning, we would arrest you for that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.619
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0300587679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0176951362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0059740141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039123192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021447791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017739294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001679075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.08407E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.5127E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.39516E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.66309E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Biden

If you were making keys that I brought in to you to get into other people's homes, we would arrest you for that. If you were taking little clickers into garages and me getting a hold of one and asking you to produce one with the same frequency, knowing it wasn't my garage, we would arrest you for that. We should think of arresting you maybe for some of the things you don't do, but that is a much larger question here and there is a balancing of equities here, unlike before. But I have an open mind on the Hollings bill and I will try to come back and hear what you all have to say.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.34
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0508779078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0378143013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0295474427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.009178972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016335713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013737483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012627896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.84647E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.22043E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.5855E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0846E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.2
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Biden

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I know you have questions. By the time you finish, maybe I will be able to get back. Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0067738911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0050877796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0048619768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023681219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013960802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005166227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004004117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.14124E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8583E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.516E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Transportation
Score:
94.428
Magnitude:
30
Code:
10
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#10
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
96.2
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
5.8
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Joe Biden

Chairman. Leahy. Thank you. That was 60 seconds.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0093251147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0057745245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00173593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011777104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003468096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000237864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.7859E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.9435E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.3254E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.0503E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.514E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.719
Magnitude:
81
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Joe Biden

No. It was probably 120, but it was close.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.153
Leans Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0525017094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0231559417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0206797165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0100371151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0077923476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0066120461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002883456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007607855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003003029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002603381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001398205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.32
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
2.5
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Parsons, we are delighted that you are here, and I do appreciate the fact that you went through a great deal to get here. Having sat frustrated on runways before, I know what that feels like. Jill Loesser has made sure that we knew you were coming, and you can feel free to give your statement now and then we will resume the questions, first with Ms. Cantwell and then Senator Hatch, and then I will ask my questions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.93
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0242298906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0164898069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021384622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020521444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014516581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.75924E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.25029E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.02958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.3516E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.8551E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.267E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
47.253
Magnitude:
54
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
82.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
9.5
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Richard Parsons

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Again, apologies to you and the other members.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0444112084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0047490874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008186191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005005227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004974865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001991064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001854865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001764932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.61062E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.29597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.3551E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
31.418
Magnitude:
45
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.8
Gunning-Fog Score
4.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Patrick Leahy

None necessary. There isn't a single member of this committee that hasn't been stuck on a runway at some time or another.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.075
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0170189014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0075873497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031173062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021207485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007717762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001128842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.19852E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.013E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.72506E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.60221E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.19748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Richard Parsons

I want you to know that I have scrubbed off the side of our plane the logo, "Leave time to spare, travel by air." It is Amtrak all the way.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0092338676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004015151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024431061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020635836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001511402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004196678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000356079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000348159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001470768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001468105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.33515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
33.243
Magnitude:
17
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
95.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Richard Parsons

Chairman Leahy, Ranking Member Hatch, and members of the committee, I am actually very grateful for the opportunity to discuss an issue of great importance to my company, and I believe to our country. As the world's largest producer of information and entertainment, we at AOL Time Warner are also a leader in developing and utilizing digital technologies for the delivery of content in innovative ways. So we really sit on both sides of the issues that are being discussed today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.954
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0525030599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0133595808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022491373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000473102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003689773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002983028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000171044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.6632E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.5949E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.965E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.692E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
78.422
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.2
Gunning-Fog Score
18.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30

Richard Parsons

Whether it is in the journalism of Time, Inc., Time magazine, CNN, or a movie like "Harry Potter" or in our music or our television programming, compelling content, we know, is what consumers want. But the continued availability of high- quality content cannot be assured unless we can do it in a manner that is safe from piracy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.732
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0270634191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0071343049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019898464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006305873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004864047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002270307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002057725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8087E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.8796E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0929E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.67E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
50.246
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Richard Parsons

This committee has a special awareness, and I believe a special competence, for not only understanding how essential it is to protect intellectual property, but for understanding the role that the Congress can play in that regard. Through the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, you helped establish needed and balanced legal protections for our industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.26868
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0605841517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0364856736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0027873099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020649242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019933163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013929629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002069157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.60999E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.0279E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2748E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.995E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
96.067
Magnitude:
60
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Richard Parsons

Digital technology offers significant benefits to content creators, to distributors, and above all to consumers. It makes possible a new level of reliability, variety and quality in the delivery of content. But this silver lining comes with a cloud. Along with breakthrough benefits, digital technology enables users to make unlimited, perfect copies, and distribute them globally with the click of a mouse.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.866
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0118836462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0112528251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006635291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002066185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001156405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001078252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.36369E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.6577E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.6043E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.7976E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6587E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
38.498
Magnitude:
72
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Richard Parsons

If I may, Mr. Chairman, I would like to show you an example of what we are talking about. This is a high-quality pirated version of "Lord of the Rings" that was available on the Internet literally hours after the theatrical release of the movie.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0171571693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.017086984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013117459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007593141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007527782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004228802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003815101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.87675E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.52667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8324E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.3792E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.322
Magnitude:
70
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Note

[Video shown.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2425190993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0640518672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0170666317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0150256019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0048344769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023732066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001473977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009323546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.41398E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.0521E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.465E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.37
Magnitude:
89
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Patrick Leahy

I liked it better watching it at the Uptown Theater, but I got your point. I understand.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.431
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0990603119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0658347213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0442844263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0133370282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.009257831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0079912388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015100118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010593056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.08704E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.33258E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.21847E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.479
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.7
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
1.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Richard Parsons

So did I, but it gives you some sense of the quality and vitality of what digital piracy can do in terms of capturing images and sounds and music, and enabling people to see it without having to go to the Uptown Theater.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.45
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.011326743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0094824616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.008443564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0057647856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012085362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003877494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002142373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001192052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.75698E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.76288E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.154E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.053
Magnitude:
62
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Richard Parsons

I read a story in the Times this morning that suggests that this is a battle between the entertainment industry and the tech industry, and that it is all about the entertainment industry's business model. I would submit that what is at stake here goes beyond copyright protection. It is a far broader question of property protection and notions which are fundamental to the functioning of free markets generally.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.836
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1456944505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0570802193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0219711699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0185621597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.006703558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008607783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007293075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003461577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.90015E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.51846E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.5363E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
65.039
Magnitude:
85
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Richard Parsons

If we as a society decide that there are certain areas where the rules against taking someone else's property without permission don't apply, we are not merely destroying the livelihood of a relatively few creative artists, or even subverting the economic rationale of a few large businesses. We are opening the door to economic anarchy that can undermine our markets.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
0.656
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.1382527407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0818659086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0639735372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00563303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0037302423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022750279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001978442
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004315997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002778048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.60909E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.7748E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.064
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Richard Parsons

Now, at AOL Time Warner we have vigorously pursued the legal remedies that exist, but I must tell you litigation alone isn't enough. We need to protect intellectual property at the source and at all places where consumers have access to it, and to do so in a way that reflects the commitment of everyone involved to the development of meaningful protection for intellectual property even in the face of technological advance.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.947
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0018020275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0011046158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009096301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003756559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001492624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.74225E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.31951E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.00787E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.015E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.885E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.223E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.199
Magnitude:
69
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Richard Parsons

Our goal is both to stop piracy and to offer consumers the easiest, most convenient access to digital content. We have worked with our colleagues in the information technology and consumer electronics industries over the past six years to develop content protections. And we have done a lot. We have accomplished a great deal in this cross-industry voluntary process and we are continuing to work together to meet new challenges.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.26868
VADER
0.836
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0122347599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045375709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0037725204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001046602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009924279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006247171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.27184E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.78886E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.53318E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.65457E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.896E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
43.27
Magnitude:
45
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Richard Parsons

Sitting beside me today is Craig Barrett, whom you have already heard from, from Intel, which is one of the most committed and productive partners in our quest to protect content in the digital environment. Indeed, Intel along with other companies has spent considerable resources developing technical solutions which we have enthusiastically embraced. We look forward to continuing to work with Intel. In fact, we are collaborating with Intel to develop a written statement that articulates common principles to guide us. We hope to release that statement very soon.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.55535
VADER
0.904
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0622805441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0105009574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0046813835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0041814572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0037470279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024527919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013681017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011512852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008243844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003041527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.22048E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
41.251
Magnitude:
68
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.4
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32

Richard Parsons

Some have asserted that new digital protection technologies will hamper consumers' ability to enjoy content in legitimate ways. The basic economics of our business plan plainly contradict such an assertion. The easier and more convenient we can make legitimate access, the greater the financial return. If we deny that access or make it burdensome or overly restrictive, consumers will either stay away or go elsewhere.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.61904
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.23676
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0075163509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0044031742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031305008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0030388243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005849243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005131629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002019535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.45418E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2621E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.1625E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.342E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
47.817
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27

Richard Parsons

We want those who purchase our products to be able to enjoy them in flexible, personalized and portable ways, and we believe in fair use. Under the content protection licenses negotiated to date, consumers will not only be able to continue to make analog home copies, but also to make protected digital copies of over-the-air broadcasts, basic cable, satellite and pay-TV offerings.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.49651
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2792270156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0692282338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0615378609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0336567231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0192954874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0038028109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036328463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005123389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000353838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001222812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.06043E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
96.625
Magnitude:
53
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Richard Parsons

We continue to make real progress in cross-industry content protection and are not calling for a broad government mandate of design requirements. Instead, it has become clear to us that some gaps exist that cannot be closed solely through license- based voluntary protection systems, as I was saying to -- he is gone now -- Senator Specter. These gaps are treated at length in my written testimony and I won't burden the committee with a recitation of them here, but just touch on them quickly.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.94444
VADER
0.455
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0729310792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0249816105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0125216029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0056545094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0049132701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002480416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001169631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.89126E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.27946E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0757E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.22702E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
96.858
Magnitude:
56
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32

Richard Parsons

There are really three, and on the first two I think we have made a lot of progress. The first is how to protect digital over-the-air signals that are in the clear and can be captured and copied. We think that we are working toward a definition of a broadcast flag that will mark those signals and keep them from being digitally reproduced, and that is an area where some government assistance may prove necessary.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.791
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.3554737894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0508916564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0313920667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0239136731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0145793747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0062736341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019062558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.77331E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.3438E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.9E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.1566E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
50.752
Magnitude:
16
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
22.403
Magnitude:
16
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Richard Parsons

The second, which is the so-called analog hole or a situation where analog content which is in the clear can be then converted into digital unprotected content, we are working on and think we are making great progress in terms of watermarking techniques that once again might require some congressional legislation to enable us to get over the goal line. We have still got a little work to do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.791
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0887294125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0680944242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0580412219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.012713029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019659235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0019457331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010558291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004610897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003903108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.65516E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.67295E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
77.584
Magnitude:
69
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Richard Parsons

The third area, which is the most troublesome, is misuse of peer-to-peer file-sharing to traffic in copyrighted materials. This is the most difficult problem to solve. Indeed, to call it file-sharing is a misnomer. It really isn't sharing; it is the equivalent of online shoplifting.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-2.19722
VADER
-0.845
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
1.2835320085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.3777271835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2050640061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0325337809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0102022117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030106426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0021672933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005443638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004068522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002166202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.13026E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
81.935
Magnitude:
38
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Richard Parsons

I think some of Senator Biden's examples aren't as far off the mark as they may have sounded to the uneducated ear because what this enables is for people to literally capture in digital format copyrighted materials and then share them with millions of people around the world, who will then have perfect copies for their use, all without respecting the rights of the owners of those copyrights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.643
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0033363493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023453145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014700954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003206897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002332148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002132065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002002371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001342757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.15131E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.3373E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.7511E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
61.146
Magnitude:
22
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
25.798
Magnitude:
22
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
3.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Richard Parsons

The pace and reach of this illegal activity continues to increase, unfortunately. New peer-to-peer services such as KazAA, Morpheus and Grokster are flourishing on the Internet. We have studies that show that at any given moment anywhere from half a million to a million people are simultaneously using one of these services and networks to find, reproduce and redistribute files, mostly in violation of the rights of underlying copyright owners -- something on the order of 90 percent.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.1431
VADER
-0.494
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1109578647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0049174512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.004029616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027677277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0019964667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016535712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002031277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.04573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.53065E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3008E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.9288E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
26.57
Magnitude:
4
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Richard Parsons

Now, no single approach, technical, legal, legislative or economic, can provide a solution, we feel. The active cooperation and committed participation of all industry sectors -- the content sector, the consumer electronics sector, the computer and IT sector, and the service providers -- will be necessary to develop a range of workable solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.03688
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0597927487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0553323422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0244000053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0224694697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046708996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016167818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007706341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002033562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001157508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.5934E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.21837E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
69.594
Magnitude:
30
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Richard Parsons

The main impetus will come from the business sector, and we endorse working cooperatively with our colleagues across the relevant industries. Yet, it is clear that at certain critical points our work must be complemented by targeted government action to support the solutions that the private sector develops, and to make them uniform in the marketplace.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0038455521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032874432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015709133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000559109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001829656
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
2.51484E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.33568E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.322E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.4139E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.7761E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5922E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
25.212
Magnitude:
27
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

You realize that those targeted government actions is where the rub is going to come in?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0090704438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0068003239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040981911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039321581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034431363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007987535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002321105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001950787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.12938E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.21019E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3988E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Richard Parsons

I do, I do, but I am confident that we can work together, first, as an industry. I love coming to talk to the Congress because it is all lawyers. It is like "who has the burden of going forward?" I think the industry, on a cross-industry basis, has the burden of going forward here, of developing a set of workable solutions that have the appropriate degree of flexibility.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.21888
VADER
0.896
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0319753337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0182720803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0032318327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0028219918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023307552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013397213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011096595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001767594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001539146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.0679E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.7435E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

I do, too, and I also think that the industry -- as I said before you came in, I would hope that they would keep Senator Hatch and myself and the committee apprised of what you are doing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.009256904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041597017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033281478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033041513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012081433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008163473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006211989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006099722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000195409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001160261
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.87149E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
91.375
Magnitude:
87
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Barrett pointed out that people talk about economic losses to the software. What were the numbers you gave me, Mr. Barrett?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0161980293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0027282018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002715618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005814272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001533548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001035574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.44548E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2543E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.5263E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3944E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.05E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
26.615
Magnitude:
95
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.2
Gunning-Fog Score
4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
6.1
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Craig Barrett

About $12 billion a year.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.007568518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014720931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010117084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000658292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004328911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001506883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.27134E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.44448E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.41356E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.7485E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.635E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
4.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Patrick Leahy

Twelve billion in piracy. The entertainment industry has piracy, too, but not of that amount, but both have an incentive. I want to protect the rights of producers and artists.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.84
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0053878161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024989289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022409478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010454439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003868209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002484754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001792492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.96379E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.2009E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4606E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8519E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.291
Magnitude:
171
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Patrick Leahy

I loved the movie "Harry Potter." I enjoyed it as much as anything I have seen -- I don't mean "Harry Potter," but "Lord of the Rings."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0081407779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032777825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013723734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004801757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004215518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001433443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.60769E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.13443E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.07778E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.125E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.882E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.907
Magnitude:
109
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83
Gunning-Fog Score
6.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Richard Parsons

Actually, both.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.001281581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009800664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006007303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005521379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002415672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.45116E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.27001E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.0592E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.9045E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.5646E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.282E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
64.65
Magnitude:
185
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Patrick Leahy

I liked them both, but "Lord of the Rings" -- I am a big Tolkien fan. I think I have read everything he has ever written, sometimes more than once, and I enjoyed that very much. But I also know that the company basically bet the farm in filming all three parts of the trilogy when they did it, and they should be protected in doing that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.921
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0382068945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0346662855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0333808857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.015775529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0059120586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009796254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009200945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004409183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001276864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.33435E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.1304E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
49.4
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
29.692
Magnitude:
65
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Patrick Leahy

Now, they could have made a lousy movie and it goes down the tubes. That is their problem; that is business. But if you make a good one and they are going to make money, they ought to be able to get the advantage of it. At the same time, if Intel or IBM or anybody else makes software chips or whatever it might be and if they have spent the hundreds of millions of dollars to get there, they ought to be able to sell it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0377536431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0287989096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009327494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005782934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002240998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001596678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.43181E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.85583E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.7016E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5835E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.962E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.976
Magnitude:
110
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

Now, somebody might not like what they make. They lose money; that is their problem. On the other hand, if they have got something that people really like, they ought to be able to make a profit on it and not suddenly find in other parts of the world or in our own country that somebody ripped it off and is selling it just for the cost of producing it, not the cost of developing it. As Mr. Barrett knows, there is a whale of a difference between the development costs and the production costs.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.463
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0205595323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0204207638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037917445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012796098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007465825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002175622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002153573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.0519E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.8333E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.4635E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.321
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

Thank you, Mr. Parsons.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1469242154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0058052057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049251248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028639111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007593886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004771256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000235176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001406781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.34616E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.5739E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.24193E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.674
Magnitude:
71
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Note

[The prepared statement of Mr. Parsons follows:] Statement of Richard D. Parsons, CEO Designate, AOL Time Warner Chairman Leahy, ranking member Hatch, and members of the Committee, it is a pleasure to appear before you today and have the opportunity to speak about such an important issue. As the world's first Internet powered media and entertainment company, AOL Time Warner ("AOLTW") is uniquely positioned to address the challenges and opportunities of the digital age. We have been a leader in developing digital technologies for delivering information and entertainment in new and innovative ways. Warner Bros. was the pioneer of DVD for video and Warner Music Group was the pioneer and first major record company to adopt the new DVD audio format. HBO was the first premium channel to offer nationwide high definition digital television. Time Warner cable has long been leading the way with digital video on demand. CNN.com offers a 24-hour news service over the Internet. And AOL is the world's leader in interactive services, Web brands, Internet technologies and e-commerce services with over 33 million subscribers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.51635
VADER
0.958
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.029541555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0075925025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021285838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010677776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006064763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.53858E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.74849E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.2951E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.3877E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.843E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.536E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.389
Magnitude:
149
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
69
Sprache Difficult Word Count
62

Patrick Leahy

At AOLTW, we live with competing business models and interests every day. But we are certain of one thing: Compelling content, be it Harry Potter or an interactive textbook, is what consumers want. Good content fuels the creation of new distribution businesses and the innovation of new products and equipment. And the continued availability of high-quality content depends in this digital age on the ability to protect that content from piracy. Therefore, as you begin examining these issues, I urge you to be guided by the fundamental principle that guides our own business decisions: strong and effective protection of intellectual property in both traditional and new environments is essential.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.91304
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.976
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0146931721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0027677594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010157183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006207613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004937954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.00038782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003262599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2829E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.68397E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.32838E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.638E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.768
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.2
Gunning-Fog Score
18.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
42
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43

Patrick Leahy

But this Committee knows that. You are experts on intellectual property protection, and through the Digital Millennium Copyright Act gave intellectual property owners important and balanced legal protections we rely upon as we innovate new digital business models. Digital technology offers significant benefits to content creators, distributors, and above all, consumers. It makes possible the delivery of higher quality in a wider range of formats and with greater reliability. Along with these benefits, however, it also poses substantial risks. Digital technology provides the ability to create quickly and easily an unlimited number of perfect copies, and allows for the global distribution of such copies with the click of a mouse. This obviously poses particularly damaging and challenging piracy risks. Our goal is both to stop piracy and to offer consumers what they want in terms of access to digital content. Before we get to the solutions, however, let me show you an example of the piracy we are facing -- a high quality pirated version of Lord of the Rings that was available on the Internet while the movie was early in its theatrical release.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.1431
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.71298
VADER
0.975
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0391519279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0051561463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045877252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0045437151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0028468623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014528036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014509455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011001907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004472535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002071832
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.88689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.35
Magnitude:
149
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
70
Sprache Difficult Word Count
65

Patrick Leahy

We know that most consumers want to see continued creativity and are willing to pay a fair price for content. Unfortunately, right now, with the advent of services like Napster and more recent peer-to-peer file swapping sites, a generation of young people is growing up thinking it's all right to steal. At an average cost of $80 million per movie, that is simply not O.K.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.398
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0219728463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0174878354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0098828954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0043529075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030310472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016147616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015824233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004085782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000314921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.88923E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.34183E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
68.158
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Patrick Leahy

Therefore, protection of content must apply pragmatically in the real world and not depend solely on legal remedies to be pursued in the courtroom. Instead, it must reflect a commitment by all contributors in the value chain to develop robust marketplace alternatives that protect content while enabling technological advancement. In order to achieve such effective protections, we have reached out and worked with our colleagues in the information technology (IT) and consumer electronics (CE) industries over the past six years to develop various content protection technologies. We are far from done, but we have come a long way and are hard at work to meet the new challenges before us.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.36772
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.92308
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.92308
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.747
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0320669787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0212206607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054429122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010745812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006293893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.07413E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.10081E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.38199E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.01886E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.5661E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.342E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.461
Magnitude:
107
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Patrick Leahy

I am pleased that sitting beside me today is Craig Barrett, from Intel. Intel has been one of the most dedicated and productive partners in the quest for protecting content in the digital environment. Indeed, Intel, along with other IT and CE companies, has spent considerable resources developing a number of technical solutions. We at AOLTW have enthusiastically embraced these solutions and we thank Intel for its past efforts and look forward to continuing to work together.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.49651
VADER
0.932
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0342876912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0176546717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0123408463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0053869066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034776338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012446202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.24025E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.61335E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.59204E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.16469E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.107E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.083
Magnitude:
97
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Patrick Leahy

Here's an idea of how much we have accomplished so far through collaborative industry work: an encryption system to protect DVD video, a technology to protect content passed through device-to-device connections in home networks, a technology to protect content as it moves from computers to display on a monitor, a technology to protect DVD audio, and a technology for making recordings for home use that inhibit the potential for digital piracy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.26868
VADER
0.866
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0126718296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0056635647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0049680079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002002857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018476885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018392448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003875764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003680302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002472043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001992245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0556E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.235
Magnitude:
99
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Patrick Leahy

The cornerstone of these cross industry efforts has been the following principle: to the greatest extent possible, copyrighted content delivered digitally should be protected with access control technologies, such as encryption, from the first point of distribution. Because the content is scrambled, only those devices and services that have the authorized keys may unlock it. To receive the keys, such devices and services must follow conditions regarding proper handling and usage of the content. These conditions are negotiated among technology providers, content owners and device manufacturers in license agreements, through a market-driven and voluntary process. Enterprising companies develop the technologies and the licenses are negotiated in private-sector negotiations. Content owners may choose whether or not to use any of the technologies, and product manufacturers are free to choose which, if any, of these access control measures they wish to enable on their devices in order to receive encrypted content.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.95551
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.7931
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.7931
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.02438
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0112267713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0092774244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025916665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009522815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003699257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001802807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.3581E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.6009E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.3524E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2612E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0133E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
76.06
Magnitude:
96
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
58
Sprache Difficult Word Count
51

Patrick Leahy

The technologies already developed and implemented by these private sector efforts have made possible new and attractive formats for delivering content to consumers. The DVD format stands out as a primary example. Consumers have enthusiastically embraced it and have adopted DVD much more quickly than any past format, including CDs for music and VHS for video.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.758
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0013323302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006754374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004985661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003410397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002096124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001120886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.04381E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.11588E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.9719E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0932E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.255E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.274
Magnitude:
128
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

Some have asserted that content owners will use these new digital protection technologies to lock our content in some type of "lock box," denying many consumers the ability to view or enjoy it. This is simply illogical. Our businesses thrive upon building as wide an audience as possible for our works. Others have hypothesized that the new content protection technologies will overreach and deny consumers any ability to make home copies. Again, they're wrong. Keeping customers satisfied just makes good business sense. We want those who purchase our content to have the ability to enjoy that content in a flexible and portable way in their homes. In fact, under the content protection licenses negotiated to date, consumers will not only be able to continue analog home copying, but also to make protected digital copies of over the air broadcast, basic cable and satellite and paid television such as HBO.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.45455
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.45455
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8873
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.87879
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.87879
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.5337
VADER
0.875
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0326124107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0313391996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.017946669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0086325781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0032773511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030668922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0010368236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008275674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007070911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001016075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.94514E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.839
Magnitude:
88
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
46
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45

Patrick Leahy

We are proud to have made the strides we have to date. So, having made a good deal of progress in our cross-industry content protection efforts, what do we see as government's role? Simply put, it is filling the gaps. We are not calling for a broad government mandate of design requirements across the spectrum of products, devices and services.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0073554576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057170146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027954371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016745087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0010905543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010369541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010030572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009048878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005207516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001327992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8689E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
67.92
Magnitude:
101
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Patrick Leahy

Instead, it has become clear that certain significant gaps exist that we cannot solve through license-based, voluntary protection systems since it is impossible to require all manufacturers to join the effort. These gaps occur when content is either initially delivered without access controls (i.e. "in the clear"), or later converted into unprotected formats. Let me explain the first of these gaps: over the air broadcasts are delivered in the clear, with no access control. Therefore, there is no way to ensure through private sector technology licenses or any other contractual means that all devices which receive such content protect it against unauthorized digital reproduction and distribution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.85714
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.811
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0216777888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0201615723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0078715289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0045544479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043230561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0028841876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024721019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017331991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011331597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.86212E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8872E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
41.417
Magnitude:
117
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
31.775
Magnitude:
117
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38

Patrick Leahy

Significant work has been undertaken by industry to develop a method for identifying copyrighted broadcasts with a "broadcast flag" that accompanies the signal to indicate that the content should not be redistributed over the Internet. In order to ensure that devices that receive the broadcast signal obey the flag, there must be a legal requirement to detect and respond to it. We believe that such a requirement can be accomplished by narrowly focused government action. It appears that our partners in the CE and IT industries agree that this targeted government action is both necessary and desirable.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.21888
VADER
0.922
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0203117248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054457993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054262662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0053613177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0032802593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001305323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010756248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009169148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003112342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002088932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.02397E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
69.957
Magnitude:
57
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.2
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32

Patrick Leahy

An even more critical and systemic problem is what we call the "analog hole." Video content, even when delivered digitally in a protected manner, must be converted to an unprotected analog format to be viewed on the millions of analog television sets in consumer homes. Once content is "in the clear" in analog form, it can be converted back into a digital format which can then be subject to widespread unauthorized copying and redistribution, including over the Internet. This problem applies to all delivery means for audiovisual content, from DVDs to pay per view, to over the air broadcasts.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.83321
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.31015
VADER
-0.656
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0249513338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0055892011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0042961165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0027291127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0020390818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006991086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005758478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003627759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002074616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.32277E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.9653E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.212
Magnitude:
170
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Patrick Leahy

One way to plug the analog hole is through the use of watermarks. A watermark is a way of embedding information in the content about its copyright status and permitted uses. The watermark is not perceptible to the consumer, but can be detected by devices. Furthermore, because the watermark is embedded, it is securely tied to the content and survives digital to analog to digital conversions. If devices that are capable of converting analog signals into digital form are designed and manufactured to detect and respond to the watermark, then the content can be appropriately protected.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.885
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0141149183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004258423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029501198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006962734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000317232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002178718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.02896E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.66295E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.85922E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3438E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.02E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
57.442
Magnitude:
51
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Patrick Leahy

As with the broadcast flag, private industry efforts are underway to develop and select a consensus watermark. These efforts have been hampered, however, by patent disputes involving various parties that own watermark related intellectual property. Because a single watermark must be agreed upon, if private industry selection efforts fail, we are likely to turn to the government for guidance and assistance. Once a watermark is selected, some government action will be needed to require appropriate detection of and response to the watermark. In our view, effective government action can be narrowly focused on the particular devices or portions of devices that are capable of receiving an analog signal and converting it into digital. No broad mandate concerning the overall design of computers or consumer electronic devices is necessary.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.65925
VADER
0.823
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0254960964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0167549661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032634664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025183284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003845485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00037907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003498321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000183985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001004289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.88885E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.17995E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
56
Sprache Difficult Word Count
54

Patrick Leahy

Now let me turn to an additional serious problem that remains to be addressed. The peer services and networks (including over the Internet and over broadband networks on college and university campuses) is rampant and exponentially growing. The popular unauthorized multiple reproduction and redistribution of copyrighted content over peer to term "file sharing" is a misnomer; this activity is equivalent to online shoplifting, in fact it's worse than shoplifting because it doesn't simply involve taking a copy for oneself, but distributing multiple copies throughout the world to others.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.27273
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.27273
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1423972542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0154305977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022079255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020375483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011825149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009029251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001438336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001205131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.49395E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.97204E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1948E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
14.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
40

Patrick Leahy

AOLTW, along with the rest of the content industries, has pursued its legal remedies in a number of cases, most notably the Napster litigation. However, the pace of illegal peer-to-peer activity has grown considerably. A host of new peer-to-peer services, such as KazAA, Morpheus and Grokster, have flourished on the Internet. Studies have shown that at a given moment 500,000 to 1 million users are simultaneously making use of these services and networks to find, reproduce and redistribute files. If the past activity on Napster serves as any guide, approximately 90% of the activity on these services consist of unauthorized trafficking in copyrighted works.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.73089
VADER
-0.557
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0059419639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0059168302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0057342513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035257701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010444803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005885968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000348567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002241977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001061965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.64353E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.98115E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41

Patrick Leahy

To date, the music industry has experienced the most dramatic impact from this digital piracy because sound recording files are much smaller and easier to copy and redistribute than are files of motion pictures and television programs. Record and CD sales were down 10% last year. In 2000, the top ten albums sold a total of 60 million units; in 2001 they sold 40 million units. And in 2000, 7 albums sold over 5 million units, whereas in 2001 none did. Because the world's largest music publisher, Warner/Chappell, as well as one of the five major record companies, Warner Music Group, are part of the AOL Time Warner family of companies, we are deeply concerned about the effects of peer to peer piracy on music.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.691
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0438698276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0128346626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0077223536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034058125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017060212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014162269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004290642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003096663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002071435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.05381E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.184E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
67.914
Magnitude:
23
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Patrick Leahy

Advances in broadband and compression technologies mean that audiovisual works will soon be subject to such severe levels of online piracy, and that piracy of music will become even more extreme, unless this serious problem is brought under control. The Lord of the Rings clip I showed you earlier was downloaded from a peer to peer service.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0467837905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0244374649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0210724262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0034000783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033567168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0033465749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030114154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002618792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003828784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00022182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.05137E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Patrick Leahy

Solving this problem is the most complicated we have experienced to date. One contributing factor is the growing variety of increasingly decentralized peer to peer networks (e.g., Morpheus, Limewire, etc). Another is that content reaches peer to peer networks from a variety of sources including unprotected distribution (e.g. "ripping" from CDs), circumvention of protected content, and camcording from theater screens. No single silver bullet -- technical, legal, legislative, or business -- can provide a solution to this thorny form of piracy. The active co-operation and committed participation of all industry sectors -- content, consumer electronics, computer, and service provider -- will be necessary to develop a range, of solutions. Accordingly, content owners will need to share in the responsibility of finding the sources of unauthorized distribution. We do not yet know what type of government measures may be called for, but some assistance will likely prove necessary to supplement private sector efforts to bring this piracy under control and to create a more secure environment for content delivery.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.8
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.8
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.84583
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.51724
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.51724
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.903
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0043704895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0032994594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0029419356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0018453658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006522274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001815533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001090025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.19473E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.16396E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5561E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1067E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
77
Sprache Difficult Word Count
74

Patrick Leahy

In conclusion, while the issues are complex, we believe that the lead must come from the private sector, complemented where needed by targeted government action. I believe that others share this vision, and hope that we can work together cooperatively with each other and with Congress to make it a reality.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0092003189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004865527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00028545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002166239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001170032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.82073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.30598E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
5.763E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.83426E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.0886E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.5388E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Patrick Leahy

Senator Cantwell has waited very patiently, and again I will not ask my questions yet, but I would like to give her a chance to ask questions. As I have noted before, we rely a great deal on her expertise in this field.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.908
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0042909291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0011739338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008799699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005422452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002560251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001890124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.49859E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
6.34974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.5739E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.23617E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.249E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Patrick Leahy

Go ahead.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1438446227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.068088487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0075176984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0064956395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0017450193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001731301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008365522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006943498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003053044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.71427E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.10475E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Patrick Leahy

STATEMENT OF HON. MARIA CANTWELL, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1315204892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0247548451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.007628747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031190073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020750689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019661296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013789289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007822704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005617331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004421137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002370123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
77.899
Magnitude:
98
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.9
Gunning-Fog Score
7.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Maria Cantwell

Thank you, Chairman Leahy. I think maybe somebody fell off their chair back there when they realized how much software piracy there was.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0030497487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024297762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012810665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012172367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001906253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.33681E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.32859E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.813E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.1592E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1205E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.461E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
90.796
Magnitude:
36
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Maria Cantwell

I want to thank this distinguished panel for being here. I can't help thinking, Chairman Leahy, that this is a very different panel and set of information than we got probably from the Commerce Committee. I don't know if there is a way for these two panels to meet or information to be shared, but I would at least say that that information was at least as interesting as last night's Fox celebrity boxing match.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.016736731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.006903238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0059151938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015635494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004445278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001816921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001238287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.57789E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.886E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8475E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.58E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.185
Magnitude:
87
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Patrick Leahy

Did you watch that? [Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0211233404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050696275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0036642301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020595024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010799841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008969363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006803454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002429432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.33559E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.38498E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.4233E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
38.203
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
35.694
Magnitude:
92
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Maria Cantwell

I can't say that I did.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0248546246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0128507047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.007063691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006334696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004359785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002236967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.29338E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
6.96296E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.43434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.46536E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2846E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
20.114
Magnitude:
105
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
0
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Joe Kraus

She taped it for later viewing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0788887322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0490077829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0234952735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0105684026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0067459208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0047169684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032138105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004097856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003932235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000113999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.1646E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.328
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
87.9
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Maria Cantwell

I do think that there is some very interesting information being presented here this morning and it is very different.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.452
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0437284209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0218005604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.009006336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0066194654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030340521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019428981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007992031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005695184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.05874E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.74634E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2638E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.814
Magnitude:
21
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Maria Cantwell

I would also like to note one other irony about this particular situation, and particularly as it relates to this committee, and that is not too long ago we had a similar hearing where the shoe may have been a little bit on the other foot, where some of the service providers and hardware manufacturers were coming in and saying we don't have enough content for these legitimate models, and when is the entertainment industry going to come forward and produce the kinds of agreements and the kind of content that we need to make these models work?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.23676
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.6920465976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.4121828359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.2735462505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1020484837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0535704195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0198932801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011702217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004888694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004306885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003000833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002849851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
31.807
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
22.525
Magnitude:
43
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Maria Cantwell

In fact, Senator Leahy, you and Senator Hatch, I think, did an excellent job of looking and nudging, but restraining ourselves from at that point in time let's have a compulsory license and mandate that the content providers provide this much content to these service providers and to these hardware device people. So now the shoe is on the other foot, so I think it is very interesting.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0173216962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.002858247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028113813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008999506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000626874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004006195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003153303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002312192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001502125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.76712E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.8213E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.779
Magnitude:
39
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
22.547
Magnitude:
39
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Maria Cantwell

I think that I would warn the committee in making sure that we do not get government involved in a particular area where government is providing a solution and, in fact, picking technology winners and losers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0523701543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0239097542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0097627759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0055494485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034557779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018972203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011920826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005238752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002364299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001249041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001066895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.392
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Maria Cantwell

I know we have entered into the record Walt Mosberg's column from this morning, but I think one paragraph of that is worth reading, where he says, "So these media companies have legitimate problems. Unfortunately, they are trying to solve them with new laws and private industry pacts that would build copy protection mechanisms to every personal computer and digital recording and playback device on the market. That would mean severe limitations on consumers' long recognized right to unlimited personal, non-commercial use of legally purchased copyrighted material."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.71
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.033565957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0292450131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0194232052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0088789777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0077872071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.007005818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0034757639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017505196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012956679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000305999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.73213E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
41.691
Magnitude:
23
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
30.661
Magnitude:
23
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Maria Cantwell

So I think that what we are really talking about here is the question about how we are going to come to this solution, how we are going to come up with a technology solution that is very hard to do. Ask the music industry. They had -- I don't know what it was -- 2\1/2\, 3 years of SDMI in the process going over these very thorny issues. The Copyright Technical Working Group has been pushing through some of these same very tough issues and are trying to come up with the answers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.359
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0152508102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0060323884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056188666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0040024206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0032922744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024594368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0018976491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006712935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001134613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.61323E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.1883E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.843
Magnitude:
23
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Maria Cantwell

I think it is important to think about where we are going. If we have had this much energy into what is really -- I think, Mr. Parsons, you said it best, a complex set of solutions, and actually some very technical solutions yet to come. Where are we going to find the best answers to those technical questions? From a government agency or from competition within the industry? I am sure, as we speak, there are hundreds of developers out there working for a variety of different companies who will reap huge dividends when we actually do break through on some of these issues.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.54654
VADER
0.95
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0670128909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0278848049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0066021545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009119701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007912251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004548811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002541707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002277609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001339951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1171E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.029E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.207
Magnitude:
34
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Note

[The prepared statement of Senator Cantwell follows:] Statement of Senator Maria Cantwell I want to thank the Chairman for calling this hearing. The question of digital rights management is at the core of digital convergence and the process of developing standards will test every industry's ability to come together to fully benefit from the technologies that are so changing and improving products and services, and ultimately our culture and economy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.887
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0069654096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0066775334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039000264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016187998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010720937
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003606899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000247455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.40494E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.46768E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.51985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6508E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
37.086
Magnitude:
15
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Health
Score:
21.649
Magnitude:
15
Code:
3
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#3
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Maria Cantwell

We are in a transition, moving from an analog to digital world. Everyone is recalibrating -- and it is a challenge.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0082852552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0078423531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005694521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0049639257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035801433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023872004
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007398216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002107136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001606746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5134E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.2671E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
63.2
Magnitude:
36
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Maria Cantwell

We in Congress have a responsibility to make sure that the appropriate balance is maintained -- that owners and users of intellectual property have the appropriate rules to live by. The best way to maintain the balance is through consensus, not government mandates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.869
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0196001303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0077724806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0060474333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0038173119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019576355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018268802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011677224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002437275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.95286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.961E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5437E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.653
Magnitude:
27
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Maria Cantwell

For several years, the Content Protection Technical Working Group has been working to develop consensus-based copyright protections that balance the needs of content creators, equipment designers and consumers. I want to urge continued progress, not conflict; compromise, not mandates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.539
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0179747207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0074991607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.005091347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036755446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018597591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001180891
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009077661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005020266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003765436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.84606E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.76156E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
69.62
Magnitude:
46
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.8
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Maria Cantwell

I want to see industries continue to work together, to resolve the complex technical issues as rapidly as possible so we can move the ball forward on all the new services that are the promise of the Internet. This is not something the government can decide.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0066072243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036520447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017627419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0015411553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0013243406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004666988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004500762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001981367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001720736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.1741E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6649E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Maria Cantwell

Let me make a very important comment: piracy is abhorrent to me, and I am truly disturbed by the scale of music piracy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.409
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0307500537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0209671271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029445317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015559588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014090141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011542194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001995588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.97339E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.0645E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.81733E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.089E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.923
Magnitude:
118
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.4
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Maria Cantwell

But technology serves many legitimate uses. As copy protections for movies and music are developed, these other uses must also be given consideration.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0447593135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0351993192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025671201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0021818181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001867207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001092129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007436314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0006273751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005940488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.1148E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.32949E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Maria Cantwell

As content protection standards are developed, we must assure that they facilitate, rather than interfere with the innovation; and facilitate, rather than interfere with the consumer's ability to fully enjoy new products and services.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.868
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0153003915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0103017308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0044485587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017288376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014556551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004619893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002572761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.90404E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.77184E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.15764E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8522E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
20.967
Magnitude:
33
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Maria Cantwell

The question to me is not whether there should be copy protection, there must be.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.049509661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020263633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020053551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017350132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011883416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005975095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003009982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002472293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001767833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001408616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7963E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
48.348
Magnitude:
52
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Maria Cantwell

The real question is how protection standards should come about; whether technology standards should develop in the marketplace or whether the government should make the decision. The government should not be picking technology winners and losers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0241754984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0112773501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0071507609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0055520104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033423617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015211931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002526662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001597209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001081606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.82622E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.10901E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
61.879
Magnitude:
89
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Maria Cantwell

I look for-ward to hearing today from our witnesses on the progress the industries have made toward delivering the content and services the Internet promises to consumers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0321578438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0108986562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0050292325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037012956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024244478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001512482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009848185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009010137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004413676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.39264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.9794E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.075
Magnitude:
52
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.4
Gunning-Fog Score
18.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Maria Cantwell

A couple of things that concern me and I think speak to the complexity of the challenge of getting these solutions are some of the issues that are already out there on the table, and I guess I would like to direct my questions to those.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
0.542
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0983996317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0325025001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.003503538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030164249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005095945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001852616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001356903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001267748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001166599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.37349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.22868E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.344
Magnitude:
42
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Maria Cantwell

First is the issue of the watermark. Mr. Kraus, you talked about this, but I want to make sure that I understand, in plugging the analog hole, exactly how that solution might work because there are a couple of things that I do now and there are a couple of things my colleagues do now and I am not sure we would be allowed to do them anymore.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.652
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0362965657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0090961679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0071254253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0040441952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009610655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004831113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004520683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002632489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.80054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.38919E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3464E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
55.518
Magnitude:
51
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Maria Cantwell

For example, when I am home in the State and often generate news, but yet fly back here to Washington, D.C., I don't always get to see it. So my staff will copy the six o'clock news, the stories that I am involved in, and because we have many stations throughout the State, thank God, that do cover the things that we do, they will compile that onto a CD and actually give that to me and give it to the other people in the delegation so that we can see how the coverage of our news events went. With a watermark solution, that kind of content could be blocked and that individual use may be prohibited.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1969461795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0998811098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0229178695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0184668839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0086607928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039196348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0008036413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000585965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005136951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001962805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001228281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
59.754
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Maria Cantwell

The second area, and I hope I am not going to get anybody in trouble here, but the Sunday morning shows are quite popular around here, but not everybody likes to spend their Sunday morning watching them. So, consequently, the Democratic network here, which is the network that runs on our Democratic TV through our offices -- on Monday morning when we come back, all those Sunday shows are copied and put on a loop so that if we happened to miss those Sunday shows, we can come back and watch them in our office on our television set.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.27273
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.27273
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.362
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.046227008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0333290198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0225294498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0040192885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0026581747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022769336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016963504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008497138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002793342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.67294E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.7544E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.286
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Maria Cantwell

Again, I think that the analog hole that we are talking about and a watermark solution would prohibit, if somebody implemented this watermark, us from doing that kind of activity. Is that correct?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0510873273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0140363758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0091430418
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005990301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.004195793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.002431742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009532529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006924123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001158471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.68623E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.134E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
57.734
Magnitude:
131
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
24.73
Magnitude:
131
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Joe Kraus

The short answer is I do not know all of the details of the analog hole watermark fix, but I do know that as we sit here I do not believe that it is clear enough what a consumer's rights are such that any technical solution will make sure to respect them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.925
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0313650526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0158387877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036091817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032244661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023784787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016225153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009660976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007890444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003521716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.70651E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.9288E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
64.077
Magnitude:
64
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Joe Kraus

Because there is significant disagreement about whether fair use exists or doesn't exist, or the extent to which fair use itself does exist for those who may agree that it does exist. I believe that, again, our organization is promoting the notion of a consumer technology bill of rights not as a way to mandate any technical solution, but rather to say that any technical solution that comes up must respect the intellectual property desires of the content creators, but also must respect the fair use rights of consumers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.26868
VADER
0.974
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0285137619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0078399076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0072797942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054828273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040428877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026807706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002501189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003924129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001624822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001006607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.34243E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
48.745
Magnitude:
22
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Joe Kraus

So, shortly put, I don't know all the details of the analog hole solution that are being proposed. My sense is a solution should be to clearly define consumers' rights in order to make sure that the market develops technological solutions that are satisfactory to both consumers as well as content providers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.03688
VADER
0.917
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0789156882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0469699036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0242486334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0103243008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0030712003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026960071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006168475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003470283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002758714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.80699E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.153E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.608
Magnitude:
78
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Maria Cantwell

Mr. Barrett, isn't that the challenge, to come up with a technical solution that protects content in what you want to, but allows that fair use, and that it is very hard to come up with digital bits that will do that?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.52
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.6621472072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0515679887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0196276218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0196104869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0135704671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0088679015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0046121804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013308306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004083842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001010741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.41945E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
45.893
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Craig Barrett

Absolutely, but you could, for example, put into your flag or watermark that this content could be copied "x" times only, and therefore promote some form of consumer fair use. Beyond those "x" copies, the rule contained in the watermark or the flag would basically not let it be copied again.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.747
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0583642453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.019508379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0183126685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022252994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019654997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011437573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000642153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003777222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003378018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002774172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.88402E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Craig Barrett

I wouldn't pretend to proclaim whether or not the Democratic network here is legal or illegal in terms of redisplaying copyrighted work, but you can put rules into the system which would allow the consumer to, in fact, reproduce legal fair use consumer expectation copies of the content, but not allow unlimited copying of the content.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.567
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0228910096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0126973275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0048620881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022898357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020661791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006615508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006430078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004457789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6424E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.26988E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.00397E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Richard Parsons

May I, Senator, because I do think the entertainment industry has a perspective on your question, and that is the things that are sort of anti-consumer in terms of the way consumers like to use and consume content that they have paid for or acquired legitimately are not good for the entertainment industry either. In other words, we want consumers to have easy and flexible use.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.892
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0084439751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0019655485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018767829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014533843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.16625E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.73231E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.07291E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.03689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7553E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.9365E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9051E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
20.217
Magnitude:
13
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Richard Parsons

So for things like copying broadcasts or any of the home uses that currently are available, you can tune the technology -- as Mr. Barrett was saying, you can tune the flags or the watermarks to permit certain things and not to permit certain things. What we are seeking to do in these inter- industry discussions is to fine-tune the technology so the kinds of things that you are talking about would continue to be permitted, but the things that are really sort of odious and disruptive of our ability and the artists' ability to monetize the fruits of their labor -- namely taking those copies, posting them on the Internet, and then zipping it around the world to anybody and everybody who wants to share it -- would be blocked.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.76471
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.82455
VADER
0.658
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2517496003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0491468818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0244811003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0171867912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0071620285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0046820711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030103987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0013281628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002277233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.81729E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.05515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
49.449
Magnitude:
6
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
35

Richard Parsons

I mean, I think you can think of the home as a boundary limit. What goes on in the home and what you are currently permitted to do in the home, we can seek to tune the protective technology to allow you to continue to do that. But the sharing of this with massive numbers of other people is what needs to be interrupted.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0383206672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.006783873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0056013938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0055895049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013695207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010979143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007455842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001195408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.86413E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.275E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2963E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.484
Magnitude:
50
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Maria Cantwell

I should just say I very much support strong piracy legislation and stopping piracy. It is critically important that we do that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.776
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0047343372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019805942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015154764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002684392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002575732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001754094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001456822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.61608E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.28726E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2112E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.2791E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
78.979
Magnitude:
64
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Maria Cantwell

I have, Mr. Chairman, one quick follow-up question that I just want to make sure that I understand. We have had some discussions with people -- and maybe, Mr. Parsons or Mr. Barrett, you know the answer to this, but I think there is at least some dialogue and talk out there that maybe a possible solution to this is somehow picking a technology winner somehow, government would say, and that this ought to be a royalty-free standard.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.874
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.02519298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0135612048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005643961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001572403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010785317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008358879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007093415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003221917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001868048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001615069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.9915E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
56.505
Magnitude:
75
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19

Maria Cantwell

Is that something that we have discussed, because I don't quite understand that notion of a royalty-free standard in the sense that the content is all about protecting intellectual property? Somehow, these very bits that are going to protect that intellectual property are also intellectual property, and I don't know that the people who produced the content went to a better school or are smarter or something and their content should be protected and paid for, but the content that is the software bits somehow should be free. I am confused there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.913
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0245411124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0069267793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034562458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032373358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012413863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004682645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001732044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.47923E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.43044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.54269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.52229E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Craig Barrett

I don't think you are confused. I think you understand the situation very well. [Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.016
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.051871466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0285682647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0066475011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.005088983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022412876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017754053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001191899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.08809E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.15961E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.81629E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.023E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Patrick Leahy

I think the Senator understands it very well, too.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.332
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.020297477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0118729084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0053164331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024238492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011933817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003728758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001128758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.59266E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.83513E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.6141E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2739E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Jonathan Taplin

I would also say one thing about this idea of picking a winner.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0199588249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0166210026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0059822287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0058367248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008831898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00077602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006003163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002751898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.57454E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.81713E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.84827E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
61.593
Magnitude:
71
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Maria Cantwell

So are people talking about royalty-free?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0330758252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0295727805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0085746055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038159182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0030562267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006429949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004614398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.18081E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.52826E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.6519E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7787E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
59.912
Magnitude:
50
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Jonathan Taplin

We have heard this, yes. You know, we work very closely with Warner Brothers and Chris Cookson, who is their senior technologist, and their idea is to not have a single DRM standard, but have multiple DRMs so that if one got hacked, the other could be replaced very quickly.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
-0.55
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0076646305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0060623996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021249209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009551055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002456574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001049606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.9015E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.63168E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.6998E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.3643E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.329E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
67.632
Magnitude:
52
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Jonathan Taplin

I think the idea of having a winner technology that is a worldwide DRM standard would make it a target for every hacker all over the world. I would much rather have multiple companies competing in the marketplace to bring really robust technologies that companies like Warner's could easily switch out and constantly protect their content and stay one step ahead of the hackers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.04452
VADER
0.918
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0816798478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.027686602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0068666479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.005928606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039342282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009867712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008077897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.58614E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.0264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.24958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.4605E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
73.524
Magnitude:
69
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Maria Cantwell

Well, Mr. Chairman, I know we have to move on, but again I want to thank you and Senator Hatch for having this hearing and for the important role that the committee has played. I think that this committee has fostered a lot of dialogue and on both sides pushed the industry together to have dialogue, but has not mandated or sought to mandate compulsory licensing on either side, and I think that is important.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.895
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0258524495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0067914327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047716083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032718737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005232975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001969936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001006538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.67512E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.91264E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.10872E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.8982E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
65.01
Magnitude:
29
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Patrick Leahy

Thank you. Well, I thank the Senator from Washington State also for the contribution she has made not only today but in the preparation for this hearing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.468
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0570477161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0408789114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0103521008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0063826526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003559758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002849745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001862929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001297427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.61052E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.56989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.84888E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
26.904
Magnitude:
6
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
21.472
Magnitude:
6
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Patrick Leahy

Senator Hatch, who has been good enough to try to juggle two different hearings this morning, is back, and rather than take my time on questions I yield to Senator Hatch.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0515740365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0166211132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0027017335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017629805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009424249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004184333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000252103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.32993E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.56743E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.32939E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.23071E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
34.114
Magnitude:
14
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Orrin Hatch

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate it, and I appreciate having all of you here. I haven't been able to hear all the testimony, but I will read it all. We know that this is a very well-balanced panel.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.535
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0226096308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0210175669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0027296202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027090504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016946138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0013199767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004301294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001689831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001617546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000145767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001292438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
38.518
Magnitude:
68
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
35.374
Magnitude:
68
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
7.7
Automated Readability Index
0.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Orrin Hatch

Mr. Parsons and Mr. Kraus, one of the reasons why online music fans have enjoyed the unlicensed music sites is that they have very deep offerings, including many hard-to-find, out-of- print songs that are not economically viable in the brick-and- mortar music world. It may be that they are not available on the major label-sponsored sites at this point because it is simply not worth the investment to clear the rights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.685
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0671050802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.041658961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0148720734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0076216136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0053581436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0041388372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012388012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0010157358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009622348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009256568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.54301E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
62.786
Magnitude:
58
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
8.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22

Orrin Hatch

While exploiting such music may not be worth the cost to major labels, there still may be fans who want it or the recording artist may find it worthwhile to exploit it online themselves, as a number of young artists do who haven't made it yet, and others as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
0.137
Leans Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0612019445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0397851487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028558765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020134148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012066268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007721495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005377023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001077889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.56564E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5287E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5111E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.916
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Orrin Hatch

Would it make sense for us to work on a way to either more easily clear the rights for such music so that we could use it online or allow the original artists to take ownership of the recordings to exploit online themselves? If so, would you work with me on that?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.827
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0243064307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0120497534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0104290477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0029526584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016673874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007398096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004696989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002188234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001181596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.16702E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7807E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
60.92
Magnitude:
25
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Orrin Hatch

We will start with you, Mr. Parsons. It has been estimated there are millions of these tracks out there. Whether there are or not, I don't know, but there are supposedly millions of them that probably will never be heard, and if you took a battalion of attorneys you probably couldn't clear them all off, and the costs might be so great you wouldn't want to clear them off.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.369
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0500943861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0079179787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0043356402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036465877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018578321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009890794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001978993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.28288E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.81056E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.82451E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.09674E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
59.976
Magnitude:
73
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Richard Parsons

Well, I think the fact is that everything in anybody's catalog or library now in music has been digitized and is out there. It is all out there now.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1442330074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0494383625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0366742461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.005134282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019450448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018915565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000801619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004567342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001084209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.27426E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.8715E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
60.427
Magnitude:
44
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Orrin Hatch

But it is not all licensed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0727897044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0683225517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0060289272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0051745788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0046589015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018907649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010530235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003739227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.14398E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.23095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.5497E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
66.437
Magnitude:
63
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
4.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Richard Parsons

Only a small, small fraction of it is licensed, and that is the problem.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0397044612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0067755449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012292253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009118249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009010825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002398519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002249291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002130397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.13426E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.6938E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.9096E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
74.389
Magnitude:
92
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.9
Gunning-Fog Score
5.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Richard Parsons

Your question covered a lot of ground, Senator. Where you have an artist that hasn't been able to get exposure or hasn't been able to make a relationship with one of the music companies, or chooses not to because they feel that they have a different economic proposition or a different message to deliver and they want to have access to the Internet, we are all for that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0101198049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056743229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0052932897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012903495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000671697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002324058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.85855E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.72494E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.54323E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.5531E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.655E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
54.599
Magnitude:
22
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Richard Parsons

The problem is that right now virtually all the music available in the world is in the clear, and it means that it is subject to being captured and distributed without respect to the artist's rights, the underlying copyright-owner's rights, if someone else wrote the music, and the rights of the recording companies that have invested in it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
-0.182
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0464237412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0162194963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0138335978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0055547749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019719548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0013419374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007977105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004885161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003566942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.95366E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7884E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Richard Parsons

Now, as you know, because we have testified here before, we are willing and eager to work with you, and again on a cross- industry basis, to find a paradigm where the rules of engagement, the rules of business conduct, can be observed in the Internet space and in the digital space as they are in the analog space. So we stand ready to do that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.807
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0466897269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0275402243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0188966194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0144112055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0139671494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051744009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034611305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0010537709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000306487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002359252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001450803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Richard Parsons

I don't know if I have answered your question because I don't know whether it was focused on rights of artists or rights of consumers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.870856829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2801362658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0252193946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0233924307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.006695489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039463659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002645276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002204356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002054276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001407413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.14029E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
81.558
Magnitude:
14
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Orrin Hatch

It is focused on both -- the rights that you have, the rights that you want to keep, and the rights that really don't mean anything to you that you could give back to artists so that they could do whatever they wanted to with songs that literally are not going to do anything. Secondly, it is too expensive to clear all the copyrights. Wouldn't it be better to give those rights back?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.605
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2252775244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0617095968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0143282683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009093454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0035885383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001181523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009690938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004020942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002489975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.43152E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.42389E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Richard Parsons

But why isn't that a matter of negotiation? I think what you are talking about is artists who have existing relationships with music companies, where someone else now has a claim that could block them from exploiting music that never saw the commercial marketplace.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.703
Very Negative
Moderation
Hate
0.0595024962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0325502828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0257069652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0137036215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0080216792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0049795908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0029137602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.001735604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0017030561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015162268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000829569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
80.415
Magnitude:
61
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Orrin Hatch

I think what I am saying is that the labels hold many, many songs that are not available in stores, or never will be available for that matter, or even online. I think what I would hope is that out-of-print or hard-to-find songs could be made available to fans -- there might be some fans out there -- and give artists some value.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0210933315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.016084798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017615623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012910709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005755018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004452329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002898777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.95723E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.29193E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3701E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9084E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
47.664
Magnitude:
40
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
32.495
Magnitude:
40
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Richard Parsons

Listen, Senator, we entirely, and I personally, endorse that notion 110 percent. The Internet and digital technology is not just a threat; it is not just a bad thing. It is an opportunity. It is an opportunity to make out- of-print or out-of-catalog or out-of-store music available to people who may not go to music stores so you can expand the market and you can offer deeper, richer product offerings and you can help the artists who made that music. But we need to find a way to do it so that --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.954
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1356351306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0173217137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.008188207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0041115753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0022083803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018375213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010160652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.6113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.99526E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9977E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2468E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Orrin Hatch

I think I am suggesting we ought to find a way to do it and we ought to do it really soon.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0133461479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0056477245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034234781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009484604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004523194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003477641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002888701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001166438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001134447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.30949E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.64262E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
41.026
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
30.337
Magnitude:
65
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
2.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Richard Parsons

Well, we are happy to work with you, Senator. We have been toiling in that vineyard and I think we are making progress, but we are obviously not there yet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0107132459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0078450685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00430861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026892714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016531123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012488576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002936764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002579648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001288212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.72932E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1586E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
43.085
Magnitude:
83
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
24.823
Magnitude:
83
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Orrin Hatch

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0907807844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0783024181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0502995506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0146460472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0094042982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0036616555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0027564251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009877852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007568784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005917525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001375507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.884
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Jonathan Taplin

Senator Hatch, I would say also that that would apply to video as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0005112334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0003944193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001708008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
3.73953E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.44256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
2.41823E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.26994E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.082E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.025E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.059E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.8E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
83.032
Magnitude:
56
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Orrin Hatch

Sure.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.214549806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0111988549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0079477155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070553899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016614193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.001033763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000737511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005394846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002714246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001841542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.78955E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
54.937
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Jonathan Taplin

We have seen the costs of storage of megabytes drop by almost 95 percent in the last 2 years, so that it would be technologically possible for us to put the whole 4,000-film library of Warner Brothers, many of which are no longer in any video store and no longer available on any network, and sell those to consumers for a reasonable price.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.671
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0499872724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0224595758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0137137264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063417967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015551755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015481408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010233849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002629704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002609185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.78336E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.18406E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
24.939
Magnitude:
52
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Jonathan Taplin

It just seems to me there is such a wealth of artistic content in America that isn't getting exposed. Now, not only is storage cheap, but bandwidth is so cheap that it is possible technologically to do all this now.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.283
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0116488678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0099850018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027980668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006244223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003852345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003731365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.51439E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.0082E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.0917E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.4713E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6281E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.705
Magnitude:
99
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Orrin Hatch

Mr. Kraus?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0349636568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0091322188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0049869661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012885677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003067648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000150515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001316601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.72652E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.74761E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.76091E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.10235E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
4.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Joe Kraus

My perspective, Senator Hatch, I think is similar to yours, in that I believe this is really an issue of embracing the medium. So what do I mean by that? I would submit that while it is not the only driver of illegal music downloading, I believe that a major driver of illegal music downloading is the lack of choice and availability of legitimate alternatives.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.859
Very Negative
Moderation
Hate
0.0393127644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.035319489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0311516487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028030558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021037957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001177303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007897333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004410419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001871545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001732321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.74859E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Joe Kraus

For example, on services like Pressplay and Musicnet currently, many of the songs that you download cannot be burned onto a CD for listening elsewhere. In addition, as you have pointed out, the catalogs themselves are very thin. I am sure that is being remedied. At the same time, I believe that that lack of choice and the lack of what you can do in the medium once you download it is one of the things that drives people toward illegal downloading services.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.55556
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.55556
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.478
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0048320017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026534433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022196298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019468374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014773417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007866979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.87905E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.01144E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.53114E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.11768E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.27931E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
42.846
Magnitude:
61
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.4
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Joe Kraus

Let me say that I know and fully respect that the content industry has every right to protect its intellectual property. Like I said in my testimony, I am a beneficiary of intellectual property myself. However, I want to contrast the approach and the statements being made with, I think, another existence proof, which is the software business.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.03688
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0270516291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0103078324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049572893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010864394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006067719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006011779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003121947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001538994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001485718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001024112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3075E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
49.118
Magnitude:
84
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Technology
Score:
21.974
Magnitude:
84
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Joe Kraus

Mr. Parsons in his testimony mentioned -- basically, I think we have heard many times a very doom-and-gloom approach that says if all of this is allowed to continue at uncontained rates that there is going to be no more content to be produced. I would submit the software industry itself as a counter-example of that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0066045031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054842702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020509195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005655376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002239082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001841897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.37716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.5452E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.1187E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.8897E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.244E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

While there is a tremendous amount of piracy in the software industry, it is still a vibrant industry, and most software is distributed "in the clear." So you have an industry which is offering digital download in software. I can go to most sites and download relatively any piece of software. The same file-sharing networks that are used to steal music I can steal software from.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0689723995
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.007731402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0042691128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018391202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017502609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017197459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003229306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.91142E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.97774E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57525E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.016E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Joe Kraus

However, because there is consumer choice, consumers have legitimate options. I can go download, for example, an anti- virus program directly from Symantec legally and I could download that and do with it on my computer what I wish. I can also download that same program illegally from Morpheus, KazAA, or Grokster.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0270593155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0140916673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0083197832
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038248112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002373709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010495916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000964849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000887358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005025109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.12319E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.91854E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Joe Kraus

My argument here is that the software industry has embraced the digital download medium, has recognized that piracy will likely be a forever bane, and is dealing with it by going after the pirates and shutting them down. We have an alternate approach currently, and I hope that will change, and I hope that will change by defining clearly what a consumer's rights are in order to encourage the content industries to put more media online, offer consumers more choice, embrace the medium, and work out technical solutions to solve the boundaries between consumers' rights and their own rights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.26868
VADER
0.924
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0134200105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0102254991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0088020774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0051341496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047478148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003463244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003152401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.68452E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.66411E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.07941E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.0317E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34

Orrin Hatch

Well, I will submit other questions. My time is up. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0501825358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020268579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020175779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017586703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011891452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005958002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003024989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002485465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001777846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001412762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8116E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.5
Gunning-Fog Score
4.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
6.1
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Patrick Leahy

Thank you, Senator Hatch.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.012498055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031901334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020384945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012140729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008435605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007442934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001741844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.0154E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3368E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.623E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.108E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
47.342
Magnitude:
47
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

Of course, I am always interested in the debates and the questions we get up here, and when I ask questions I am going to go to one thing. The entertainment industry came to us a year or so ago when the FTC came out and said that they weren't doing enough to self-regulate the advertising of violent entertainment to children.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.20067
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0058860634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036620397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015544178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014943183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012183888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000523068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.94419E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.83394E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0084E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.6091E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6508E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
49.21
Magnitude:
68
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Culture
Score:
21.119
Magnitude:
68
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Patrick Leahy

There were all these requests for real tough governmental mandates on that. I was one of the few who said that we ought to let the market work this out, and I remember the entertainment industry saying it was great that somebody understood them. Now, we have the same entertainment industry coming in and saying, of course, we have got to have government standards and the industry can't work it out. It is an interesting thing and we are going to get into that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.898
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0546491821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0315947662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0073381183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041001498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014056603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.94207E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.25256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3998E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.3306E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.68E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.95E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.406
Magnitude:
49
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

Senator Edwards has been waiting and I will again withhold from asking my own questions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1286746003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0693957554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0518161454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0454861496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0068439826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0066315013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002659494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001884664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001444867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001239209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.33405E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
71.599
Magnitude:
60
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Patrick Leahy

Senator Edwards, go ahead. I have got to stay here anyway, so you go ahead.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1673355582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0477601367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0263161288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0099988465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0062442683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025238511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0018861581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008361838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008067435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004984415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2246E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.571
Magnitude:
48
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

John Edwards

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0107617583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0079280726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006224911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005146513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002064885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001571578
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.72902E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.4109E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.4234E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.493E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.203E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
80.172
Magnitude:
38
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Patrick Leahy

I feel this is probably going to be more pleasant than the Judiciary Committee meetings later today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.552
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0051479954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0026651473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013964623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001080015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006270838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001072491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001018291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.43722E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.14658E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.117E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.4025E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
60.129
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.3
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

John Edwards

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for holding this hearing, and thank you to all the witnesses for being here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.758
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0179816285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056433746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019334493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016161188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007419364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003881686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003767595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002084142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.83046E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.11155E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.29966E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
94.3
Gunning-Fog Score
2.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

John Edwards

Let me just make a few comments. I start with a core belief that I know has been recognized by probably almost everyone here that when people put creative energy and money and investment resources in creating a product, that product ought to be protected and protectable.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0073046271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0062277184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024633851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010885945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005057595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000200668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00011251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.82308E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.38746E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.5877E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.215E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

John Edwards

The level of piracy we are seeing is just completely unacceptable -- 10 million movies download every month. I saw a report that one Internet copying racket has 1.8 billion unauthorized downloads every month. Clearly, the music industry is suffering. The movie industry, I think, is extraordinarily at risk. This piracy is an enormous drain on a creative, dynamic, important industry for our economy and we have to stop it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
-0.095
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0351789902
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0040996529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025298512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0018378858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005781505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005419168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005310958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000316279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.26585E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.0884E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.3487E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.147
Magnitude:
86
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

John Edwards

The second point I would make is that I think also this piracy is having an effect on other technologies, particularly broadband, because we know that broadband depends on the wide availability of content, content that requires broadband. We know that online movies are exactly that kind of content.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0181372438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.012728617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0105639891
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0091397116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0066528912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0046933765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0044276425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036736561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018823199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003387748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002621346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.357
Magnitude:
45
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

John Edwards

The movie industry is nervous, and I think they have reason to be, about selling movies on the Web because those movies can't be protected. So I think we know that fighting illegal copying not only benefits the movie and the music industry. It also, I think, will be important in promoting broadband and benefiting American consumers and American education.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
-0.712
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0621521089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0151520842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0076555581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018837422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014740782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002844651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002108062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001866807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001156256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.54959E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.9381E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
47.094
Magnitude:
68
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

John Edwards

Third, with respect to all these piracy problems -- broadcast hole, digital hole, peer-to-peer systems -- we all agree that it will be much better if the major players can work out the solutions on their own and that our role, government's role, is to enforce those solutions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.011132787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0092300463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.008931075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013422587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009291813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007035362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000698642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003190354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003065779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.93374E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.46917E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.189
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

John Edwards

If private negotiations don't succeed, then government may well need to step in. My greatest hope is that you all will work this out and that our role will be limited to backing up and enforcing your agreements.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.834
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0919731916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0633922988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0612828182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063925138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0062003652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047827696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014617327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001945627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001146933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.56777E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.59219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
82.027
Magnitude:
56
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

John Edwards

I really only had one area of questioning, and it has been touched on. I heard Senator Cantwell ask about it. I think another Senator earlier before I arrived asked about this subject, and it sort of goes to the fundamental question of what would need to be done to computers in order to provide the kind of protection that might be needed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.36772
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0090908012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0048853446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020611784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013994687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004861788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001569075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.64648E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.42763E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.34966E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.25451E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.5243E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.729
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

John Edwards

The way I view computers is they are an enormously powerful and flexible machine that has obviously had an enormous impact on our country. But there has been at least some suggestion from what I have heard that in order to protect against piracy there may be a need to change what some people would consider the fundamental nature of a computer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.782
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0769018079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0560829125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0474460685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0038879614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024490731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009549216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004993194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000272575
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002179622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.74048E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.17037E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.682
Magnitude:
50
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

John Edwards

I have trouble seeing that myself, but I am interested -- and I know you all have touched on it at least tangentially when other questions were being asked, but I would love to hear what members of the panel think about that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0009274991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000563023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0004671811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003714884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002452613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001995601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.84046E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.35346E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.0036E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8053E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4596E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.461
Magnitude:
43
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

John Edwards

Yes, sir?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0191456318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0144077159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0141747092
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.006018467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036531001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0021356231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011006389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009350312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003229112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003075566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001404809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.545
Magnitude:
61
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
1.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1

Jonathan Taplin

Well, I don't think, quite frankly, anything needs to be done right now in the sense that there are really good, legitimate digital rights management technologies. There are at least three commercially available that not only allow a consumer to watch a specific piece of media for a specific period of time and not send it anywhere else and not forward it -- and these technologies are being used by Time Warner in music downloading joint ventures, and being used by us in video streaming ventures.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0305747148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0155326197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0075089716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0060841758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013743563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008354241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001296785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.33962E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.48096E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.01447E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.69229E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
57.572
Magnitude:
62
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
24.347
Magnitude:
62
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25

Jonathan Taplin

These technologies are consistently getting stronger, partially because of the cooperation of the technology industry and the entertainment industry. New ideas constantly come up between Warner Brothers and ourselves of, okay, how could we make the black box of the DRM work better and everything.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.848
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0105552899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0065815417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025637708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022665519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009480535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006716868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003815603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002126495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001760182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.47749E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.86444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Jonathan Taplin

So my sense is I don't think you have to fundamentally alter the nature of the intel architecture in order to do this. Are there certain things that could be done? Yes, but Intel, for instance, had a big blow-up when they had a specific processor chip identity and they could have bound a piece of media to only that processor. Everybody said, oh, this is privacy invasion.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0776241242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0365734333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0168389044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0064306543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014163322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005041079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001740869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001205482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.60505E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.49484E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.53057E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
65.724
Magnitude:
88
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Jonathan Taplin

It could have been a very useful thing to literally make sure that a piece of media couldn't play on anything but the individual processor to which it was downloaded, and everybody went crazy on them on that. So I mean there are lots of cases where the industry is willing to do very innovative things and they run afoul of other problems.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
0.032
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0802252209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0170835308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0144686652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.014074787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0051502044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013415483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011724761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008520605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004699583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002487037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.14833E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
84.331
Magnitude:
124
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Craig Barrett

I think the issue really is this, that if content is protected at the source, then, in fact, you can protect it through the rest of the system and its distribution. The DRM capability is there. You can upgrade that from a software standpoint. You don't have to do anything to the hardware to upgrade it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0315069308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0282652647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0141828074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033043689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029550019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017851078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002131112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001558653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.35845E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.90136E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.25838E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
48.114
Magnitude:
63
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Craig Barrett

The challenge is when there is streaming media out there which is unprotected. It is just a bunch of ones and zeroes. It could come from a movie, it could come from a song, it could come from my home video. How do I differentiate whether that is copyrighted media or not, and what would I do to allow you to receive lawfully-generated information or streaming media and not allow you to receive copyrighted media?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
-0.144
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0307224167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0105622872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095577918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026464078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013233243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012356933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001888626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001200507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001103645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001007101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.58132E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
85.373
Magnitude:
35
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Craig Barrett

That is the major issue that the industry is facing today. All of the "in the clear" content on the Internet can be downloaded because it is not protected. And you ask what can you do to protect that? I don't think there is a simple technical solution to that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.713
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1529878122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0972368347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.031967074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0071620001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0014127856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011641365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008044188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007033819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006775361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.40548E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.09567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.7
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Craig Barrett

You could say you can't download streaming media. That would serve no one's purpose because there are many lawful applications for downloading streaming media -- audio or video that you create in your home and your own grandchildren send it to their grandparents.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.3726386232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0598645944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0177231836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046206107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037766527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035192697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0029389237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003170605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.88076E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.68399E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.78371E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.236
Magnitude:
35
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Craig Barrett

There have been other proposals, not technical proposals but I think kind of pie-in-the-sky proposals, which are let's just compare the streaming media that is coming to you to a fingerprint of all copyrighted content in the world. So let's wiretap the information you are sending or receiving over the Internet and compare that to copyrighted content someplace on the fly.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0099772835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0061333478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.004316535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017060944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004412346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004203146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001853171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.77123E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.15499E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.66162E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.958E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.502
Magnitude:
33
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Craig Barrett

If it is copyrighted content and you are getting it in an unprotected form, then slam the door. I think there are huge technical challenges to doing that. I don't know how to do it, and I think there are huge privacy challenges to, in fact, listen to someone's Internet communications without their permission if you don't like what they are receiving.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.087
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1414603787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0423848338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0291350327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0100130441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0059613289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0052444262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042016505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002083729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001743027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.44241E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.8375E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
79.192
Magnitude:
34
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

John Edwards

Can I get the comments of others? Mr. Parsons?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
1.5298773535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.251465477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2327728085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0166580488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0154632522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0131954133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014922619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005770863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005565082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004210633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001368454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
97.069
Magnitude:
19
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Richard Parsons

You have several things working. I don't think that there is -- and I am not a technologist, but as I understand it, a need to re-architect computers. Much of what we are focused on now is, as Mr. Barrett was saying, how to flag, watermark, or otherwise encrypt digital material at the source and then, whether it be a computer or a consumer electronic device, detect that flag, that watermark, that encryption so that only the uses that were permitted at the source can thereafter be done.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0312955177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0243245828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0122535566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0084888386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005824304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014419008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009730825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005901458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004089989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.92681E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.761E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
86.77
Magnitude:
30
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Richard Parsons

To some extent, as I just said to Senator Hatch, virtually all of the music in the world now is available in digital space. You can't get that horse back in the barn. But going forward, we need as an industry -- and I think I want to trade your statement; yours was better than mine. We as an industry need to come up with a set of standards that say, okay, these are the rules going forward; this is how digital material needs to be flagged or watermarked or encrypted, and devices need to respect these stop signs, if you will. That may need some legislative push, but that doesn't require a reengineering of underlying computer technology or architecture. That is step one.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.21131
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0330327457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0045408997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025804873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0013348675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008444363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007104517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000516811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004594024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.09358E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.4811E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2504E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29

Richard Parsons

I think step two is then to try and figure out how, with some of the stuff that is in the clear, it can either be fingerprinted -- I mean, we are experimenting with some of this stuff now -- or are there other technologies that can lay over the existing install base of computers that will help manage that problem as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0210187078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0192220352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0162368131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0153017929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0152367109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.004329178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040962375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006155975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004692574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001911561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001333932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
45.926
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Richard Parsons

But the principal focus right now, I think, from an industry perspective, at least from my perspective is what do we do going forward, not what do we do about what happened in the past.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0673835922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0326013425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.023337781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0105271145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0050610535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0024442479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015917845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015414611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000189273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.12002E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.75571E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
29.174
Magnitude:
53
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Education
Score:
24.488
Magnitude:
53
Code:
6
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#6
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

John Edwards

Mr. Hughes?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0941952982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0230964535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052251471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0051683597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004566403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036952966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00054856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.53911E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.11366E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.21414E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.08008E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.817
Magnitude:
59
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Justin Hughes

I just wanted to add that I think that there are three questions when we are talking about digital rights management systems and whether they are mandated by government or simply agreed by private industry.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0132952526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0074132695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0055086384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037368471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007487508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006773615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004196841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.8032E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8893E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9366E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.17E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
85.877
Magnitude:
75
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Justin Hughes

One is how widespread they are; that is, the number of digital devices they cover. If you look at Senator Hollings' and Stevens' draft legislation, it is far too epic in its scope.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0127467734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047494992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012139618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011688063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011227858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0006684214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004849591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003586719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.38027E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.80164E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.964E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
37.413
Magnitude:
41
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
25.962
Magnitude:
41
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Justin Hughes

The second one is how intrusive is the system. Mr. Barrett was completely right to say that many of the ideas that have been floated about are just too intrusive for our civil society.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2122773323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.1026526908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1012485242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.064136507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0351703202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0314047007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0227711746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.006116544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0055409611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0053282034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0048627277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8

Justin Hughes

Then the third one is how will it affect the current expectations and the fair use rights of consumers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1866931445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0416792958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0109544097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0045171881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037855265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014096687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001941694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001407404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.47703E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1175E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6791E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Justin Hughes

So the first question: digital rights management needs to be effective in combatting piracy, and then, third, we have to calculate the costs which I put under those three categories.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9781401157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7100218683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4066372067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9470935911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9110790677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6569254678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2249141689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.144392089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1300290925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0911958807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0490104663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.697
Magnitude:
58
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

John Edwards

Yes?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0265499228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0137148381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0049759456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014213617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006257594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001955467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.89919E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.15181E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2581E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.06013E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.481E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
90.565
Magnitude:
85
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Joe Kraus

The last thing I would add is I would refer you on your original question of how does the re-architecture affect the computer industry to Professor Felten's written testimony. He says very eloquently that solutions that Mr. Barrett does not favor -- for example, the fingerprinting -- have an effect on the general purpose nature of a computer and why that is a powerful tool for innovation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0382581376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0149156156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0051949639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050619175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0040252336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0037707185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037000464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0030067176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002270695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002505219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002008727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
98.025
Magnitude:
108
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Joe Kraus

He gives an analogy which I will repeat here, which is that by general purpose tool I mean that the computer is able to perform powerful operations on data without needing to understand everything about that data. That key element is what enables computers to be cheap, very flexible, and platforms for innovation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.762
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0435170077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0400384713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0162236582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0098861754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0069154928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0038955102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026556154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0018243836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013294694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0006517282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001271311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
23.912
Magnitude:
63
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Joe Kraus

Let me give you another example in the world, which is the phone system. The phone system is general-purpose; it can perform powerful operations on data. Every nuance of every conversation you have is faithfully replicated by the network. But Alexander Graham Bell did not anticipate answering machines or voice mail or call waiting or modems and data transfer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.681
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0097565317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020744259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020438516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013836184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008533479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004430921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001390095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001261885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.33004E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.63798E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.85532E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
79.877
Magnitude:
48
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Joe Kraus

The notion here is a general-purpose platform is very ripe for innovation because it is general-purpose and doesn't have to understand all the bits that go through it. Solutions which require computers to "understand" all of the bits that go through them are naturally more constraining and more expensive because they lack that fundamental nature of not having to anticipate all future uses of that platform itself. Again, the phone network is a perfect example.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0469765539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0193755201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0097421223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0052868672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009930613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000860126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005845808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004047523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000320693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002994721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002431235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.129
Magnitude:
49
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.5
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

John Edwards

Well, I still have some trouble seeing it, but I appreciate it very much. I appreciate the testimony of all the witnesses and the work you are doing in this area, which as I said earlier I think is critically important.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.856
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0135657188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004357555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019210323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0019200708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019075615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005946173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.58529E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.3826E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.2465E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9449E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.634E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.825
Magnitude:
66
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

John Edwards

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for having this hearing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0011338224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008277001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000626461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002523686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001153334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
6.27178E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.2284E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.1963E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0495E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.8419E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.282E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
83.156
Magnitude:
85
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.5
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Patrick Leahy

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0022630638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011382122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009191902
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004850784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003006783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001679273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.03366E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.24873E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.70403E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.03559E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Kraus, I couldn't help but think -- it is somewhat related to what you were saying about the phones -- I remember when government very fully regulated phones, innovations, what you could have. You couldn't get things like call forwarding, or you couldn't get all the other things because, no, we don't have to give you that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
-0.573
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0083892774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027568192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014581349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012295101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012034228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001542736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001247082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.2631E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.42031E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.3867E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.185E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
85.221
Magnitude:
68
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Patrick Leahy

Then when they started allowing industry to come up with it, all of a sudden you were finding all the things that the phone company, when it was controlled with government saying what the standards were and it is a monopolistic and everything else -- all of a sudden, wow, when you could compete with it, sure, you can buy a phone with everything from the hold button, to the transfer, to the conferencing, and on and on, the answering machines and all the rest.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0327734218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0167619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0076980017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054490924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031363368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025104131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004217512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003547963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002363884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.48846E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.12669E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
77.196
Magnitude:
39
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
1.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15

Patrick Leahy

That is what I want to make sure of. I want to make sure that we are able -- I don't want to stretch this analogy too far, but, of course, under the phone system criminal conduct did take place over the phone. People would call up and plan crimes, plan other things, the criminal. It didn't mean that we did away with the phone system. We tried to do away with the criminals. As a former prosecutor, I remember that very well when people would call up and plan an armed robbery or something like that. It is not the phone; it is the people doing it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.61904
VADER
-0.813
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0737962779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0487183308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0118131677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.004836492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0041443389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025185807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004647898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003684993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.66747E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.59474E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.51377E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Patrick Leahy

Here, of course, we are talking about the fact that you can run millions of times more data in that same amount of time. Mr. Barrett's comments -- and I keep going back to two of them especially, Mr. Barrett. One is the fact that you had better get this at the source or by then the horse is out of the barn.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0088589084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.003838693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.00360349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.002564382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018727462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004940696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004048554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003383596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001232093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.22814E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1128E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92
Magnitude:
61
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91.9
Gunning-Fog Score
6.3
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
6.9
Automated Readability Index
2.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Patrick Leahy

The other one is if you are going to try to track these things while they are going on, how can you possibly do that because you have millions, sometimes tens of millions of items going across the Internet? I am really struck by both of those analogies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.31
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.2537598833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.066572387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.012109962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0068305722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0038239432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.003237799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001324477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003578396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001647918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001030388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.56802E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
69.201
Magnitude:
17
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.4
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Patrick Leahy

I have asked that the committee be kept apprised on a regular basis, certainly every couple of months, about the progress being made in the inter-industry working groups on finding some technical solutions to protecting these digital copyrighted works, including the solution of the broadcast hole and analog hole.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.033783447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.007411086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0019801164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004874788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003536323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002533251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.6724E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.06739E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.6452E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4942E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.7548E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
7.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Patrick Leahy

I went out to California a few weeks ago and met with content providers, software providers, and technical folks. Mr. Barrett, people were there from Intel, but also from the movie industry and others, trying to figure out how you bring about the solution. If I was at all sanguine that we could come up with an easy solution before the meeting, I certainly wasn't after.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.916
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0024223125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016947837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000833124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0007818886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000235669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000121534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.61334E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.98468E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.58588E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.34075E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.6558E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

I mention that because I want to note publicly my appreciation to a lot of companies who have differing views on what should be done -- the entertainment industry, the innovation industry, the software and other industries. Even though they had differing views, they all were willing to come at their own expense, come to this meeting, spend time, and do a great deal of work preparing for it. I just wanted to say that I appreciate that to all the companies that did it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.941
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0500901777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002040459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020208226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017664155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012040727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005998155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003055642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002506569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001799145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001425733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8216E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.5
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16

Patrick Leahy

That is why we want here for the committee -- to the extent you are willing to share your progress with us, do so. The more sunshine we have on it, the better it is. We will be informed and less apt to be swayed by the statements of whoever thinks they have a momentary advantage saying an impasse has developed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.918
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0765910605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0274248305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0233758168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0101839476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.010129498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022665154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007839642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001962453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001636189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.57262E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.34142E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
37.318
Magnitude:
35
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Patrick Leahy

I think there may come a time when you have that consensus solution, and then we can talk about whether we need any kind of a legislative blessing or legislative mandate there. Frankly, I don't think we are there now. Frankly, I think it would be a disaster to try to have legislation go through now. I think that it is possible that we could reach that point.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.242
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0068107271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029046936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021784666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008860524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007151504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001973867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000100332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.39013E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.6668E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.852E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.693E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Patrick Leahy

I mention that only because if there are enough conflicting views on this, as a practical matter under the Senate rules no legislation will go through anyway. That may be a good idea, it may be a bad idea.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.66
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1026398269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047243742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033896667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000729606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004531315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000319908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002303683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.70044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.60964E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.828E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.37E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.5
Magnitude:
70
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Patrick Leahy

So I would ask both of you, will you commit your companies to try to keep us apprised of what is going on?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.889
Magnitude:
33
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
5.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Craig Barrett

Well, I think both AOL Time Warner and Intel will immediately send you a copy of our joint statement of principles in this area, and then from the technical working group we can give you periodic progress reports on solutions to at least two of the problems we mentioned today; that is, the terrestrial HDTV and then the analog hole issue.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.44
Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
59.038
Magnitude:
31
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

And, understand, nobody is asking for corporate secrets on this. We just want to be kept apprised.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.275
Magnitude:
67
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Parsons.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.048
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.9
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Richard Parsons

Let me say, Senator, that I think your idea is a splendid one. Your notion of a little sunshine on the process -- of course, we needed a little sunshine this morning to burn that fog off, but sunshine on the process here is good. That is a way in which you, this committee, and the Congress can be helpful by keeping some measure of gentle pressure on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.96
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
28.659
Magnitude:
21
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Richard Parsons

It is a subject worthy of your tracking and following, and we will work together with our colleagues at Intel, as we have been, and our other colleagues both within the entertainment industry and across the CE and IT sectors to come back to you, I think you have suggested on a bi-monthly basis, and just tell you how we are doing. And we look forward to your administering the tough love when we need it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.856
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
87.296
Magnitude:
73
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Joe Kraus

Mr. Chairman, can I add that I think consumers do need to be part of that process of developing whatever standards are developed that end up affecting consumers' lives? They need to have a voice.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Patrick Leahy

I want to make it very clear, Mr. Kraus, that I want your comments, and Mr. Taplin's and Mr. Hughes'. That is why we have got this new point on our Web site. You can feel free to contact me, you can feel free to post it in our Web site, and we are going to make sure that everybody knows, whether you agree or disagree with me. I can assure you that the people who disagree with me don't hesitate to let me know -- one of the reasons I am glad to have an on/off switch. But we won't turn it off; we will listen to what you have.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.54654
VADER
0.937
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.106
Magnitude:
77
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
92.9
Gunning-Fog Score
7
Coleman-Liau Index
5.2
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Barrett, you and others on the panel have warned us about the cost to innovation that sometimes comes up with government intervention. Let's use a hypothesis: Say the major content companies persuaded us in Congress to mandate the use of certain anti-piracy technologies that they have presented to us, and then mandate that the Internet service providers and the online service providers and all digital device manufacturers support them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
0.649
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
56.417
Magnitude:
44
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26

Patrick Leahy

What does that do to you if you are working on developing new anti-piracy technologies that might serve the interests of content providers who may want to distribute their content in different ways?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
83.43
Magnitude:
65
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10

Craig Barrett

Well, I think anything that freezes technology in place and stops innovation is bad for all parties concerned -- the content owners, the intermediate hardware suppliers, software suppliers, and the consumers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
81.651
Magnitude:
47
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Craig Barrett

My biggest concern would be to adopt a standard which would then stop development of new capability. If we had stopped the Internet and software at plain, flat-text messages going back and forth and saying that you are not allowed to do anything beyond that, then you wouldn't have had the CD-ROM, you wouldn't have multi-media, you wouldn't have the ability to translate audio, video, et cetera.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
-0.418
Negative
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
70.565
Magnitude:
35
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Craig Barrett

If we stopped just with one form of transmission of rich content, then you will stop new compression technologies, new capability to bring the consumer a better experience, and allow the content owners to provide that content to the end consumer with a better business model.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.78846
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.94444
VADER
0.802
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14

Patrick Leahy

You have such things as blue laser technology and all these other things that may change the whole picture yet again.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
International Affairs
Score:
24.466
Magnitude:
11
Code:
19
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#19
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Craig Barrett

Well, certainly blue laser technology, or blue ray technology, is just going to give you ten times the content density in a DVD and will allow you pack more and richer content, better end user experience. This is precisely what has driven this industry forward. This is precisely what will allow people like Mr. Parsons to deliver better content, richer experience, better business model to the end consumer. The same with Mr. Taplin.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.49651
VADER
0.974
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
46.84
Magnitude:
13
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Taplin, did you want to say something?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
91.832
Magnitude:
49
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2

Jonathan Taplin

Yes. My sense is that any attempt -- and we could look at the digital TV problems that have happened when the government in Japan decided that there was going to be a digital TV standard and they made it an analog digital TV standard. The Japanese spent 10 years developing an analog high-definition television standard, only to find the year after they adopted and published it that it was totally useless because everyone had gone to digital.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
-0.47
Negative
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
88.999
Magnitude:
41
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.9
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Jonathan Taplin

We happen to be using a technology called Ampeg 4, and there are lots of various variations of that. But when I compare what is happening in the Ampeg 4 world, delivered by Real and Microsoft and others, to the government Ampeg 2 standard, it is unbelievable.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Jonathan Taplin

Ampeg 2 has not changed from 3.8 megabits per second throughput in 12 years. Ampeg 4 gets better quality every six months at half the bit rate. It is like Moore's law on steroids. You know, we see the kind of innovation that comes with two competing companies, Real and Microsoft, constantly trying to better the quality at a lower bit rate, and that is what the marketplace delivers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.93827
VADER
0.738
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Jonathan Taplin

If there was a government standard, my business would come to a halt because everyone would stop. There wouldn't be any content available to us at all, and my guess is it would take three or four years for everybody to actually bring it into the marketplace.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Patrick Leahy

You also have a point. The Internet is worldwide. I get correspondence every so often from a friend of mine in Sri Lanka who sends me something that might have been in an article there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
0.541
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Patrick Leahy

Mr. Parsons, I will see things on the CNN.com site that somebody picks up in whatever country it is and sends it back. How are you going to control that?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
92.5
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9

Jonathan Taplin

Well, I just came back from Europe, the Ce Bit convention.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Topics
Topic:
Labor
Score:
52.254
Magnitude:
57
Code:
5
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#5
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Jonathan Taplin

Chairman Leahy, If they don't have the same standards, what do you do?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
64.617
Magnitude:
45
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
89.5
Gunning-Fog Score
5.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
4.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Jonathan Taplin

Yes, and we saw some IP video, the same kinds of standards that we are using, delivered to cell phones that handle 9.5 kilobits a second through a 3G phone. It was the first time I said that really looks decent. So I mean there is constant innovation going on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.649
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
96.636
Magnitude:
64
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Jonathan Taplin

We have got some standards now. It is called IP HTML, you know, a basic format and platform on which we can all work and innovate. That is the format that AOL's whole Internet service runs on and it exists already.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.494
Positive
Topics
Topic:
International Affairs
Score:
78.586
Magnitude:
147
Code:
19
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#19
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.5
Gunning-Fog Score
7.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Patrick Leahy

Well, gentlemen, you have been good. We have gone beyond the time we told you. I am going to submit some other questions for the record, but I would also suggest this. All of your statements will be made part of the record, but go back through this record, and I will make you an offer. If you see something in there, like I wish I had said this, or I wish I had added that, do it. This is not a "gotcha" kind of thing. I want your input.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.762
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Civil Rights
Score:
30.726
Magnitude:
42
Code:
2
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#2
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
21.769
Magnitude:
42
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.5
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
7
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Patrick Leahy

Excuse me. One of the problems with the dry air in here; I seem to have gotten a nosebleed. I am sorry. I apologize for that. We will stand in recess for a moment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
35.796
Magnitude:
85
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88
Gunning-Fog Score
5.1
Coleman-Liau Index
5.6
SMOG Index
6.9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5

Note

[Pause.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.999
Magnitude:
46
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count

Patrick Leahy

Senator Cantwell [presiding]. Senator Leahy had to step out for just a moment. I am sure he is going to return because he wanted to make, I think, some last closing comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
92.308
Magnitude:
39
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79
Gunning-Fog Score
5.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7

Patrick Leahy

I think, as I ran upstairs, that most of you made your wrap-up comments on this. Is that correct? Is there anything else anybody wants to add before we adjourn?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
89.069
Magnitude:
39
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
2.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6

Richard Parsons

Well, Senator, having started late, I will cause us to go even later. I do think that several of you have indicated a sense of reluctance to jump into the pool now with both feet, that you are looking for more work -- I will put it that way -- on the part of the private sector.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.077
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Technology
Score:
72.82
Magnitude:
95
Code:
17
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#17
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Richard Parsons

The reality of the circumstance we are in is he needs me in his business to make it work long term and I need him, and I think that recognition is becoming deeper within the industry and you can look forward to more cross-industry collaboration.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Richard Parsons

But we need you to keep our feet to the fire and to make sure that that cross-industry collaboration is productive, because what is at issue here, what is at stake here is something larger than just the well-being of my industry or the well-being of the software industry or the well-being of the consumer electronics industry, or even the well-being of individual consumers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
34.08
Magnitude:
72
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
8.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Richard Parsons

There are interests that are larger than that that underlie this whole set of issues we are talking about in terms of how a government of laws and a nation of laws that has built its position in the world on the basis of the fact that there are established rules and people can commit effort and can commit capital into an enterprise knowing what the rules are ahead of time and that those rules are going to be enforced along the way -- that is the backbone of the American economy. That is why we are someplace different than so many of the other countries in the world because you can commit capital and effort and intellect on a set of rules that are fair and balanced and that will be there down the road so that you know where you are going at the time.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.898
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
57.343
Magnitude:
115
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28

Richard Parsons

I think that is what underlies this whole discussion and I think that is what the interest of this committee and this Congress is, ensuring that structure, that framework of rules and laws and property rights remains intact in this digital world.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13

Richard Parsons

We have the burden of going forward in terms of trying to work it out, but you have the ultimate responsibility of making sure that we are moving forward. So I think that the structure that the Senator talked about and that this committee is imposing, saying keep us informed, we are not ready to jump in just now, but keep us posted, let us know of your progress, let us know if and when you do hit serious stumbling blocks, is a good one.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.67
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Domestic Commerce
Score:
91.454
Magnitude:
61
Code:
15
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#15
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20

Jonathan Taplin

I would like to just take that one step further, and this is something you mentioned earlier in your statement. Companies like myself and Time Warner Cable have committed incredible amounts of capital to building the infrastructure to deliver video on demand in legitimate, encrypted ways.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.681
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Culture
Score:
43.348
Magnitude:
74
Code:
23
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#23
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.4
Gunning-Fog Score
18.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18

Jonathan Taplin

Some content companies who may not own last-mile networks or who may not have made those investments have chosen to perhaps withhold content from the broadband industry, in the mistaken idea that it would change the supply/demand curve.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
-0.361
Somewhat Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Jonathan Taplin

Mr. Parsons' company is paying 10 percent more margin points for video on demand this year than they were last year because people withheld content to a point that they needed to get some content out on their video-on-demand system.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.36772
VADER
-0.128
Leans Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11

Jonathan Taplin

So I think it is important that we not confuse the piracy fear issue with other economic issues that some slightly misguided studios may have in terms of how to change the economics of the business, because we have all made huge capital commitments to an industry with the understanding that content would be forthcoming. And to have those content licenses withdrawn at the last minute sometimes -- and AOL is the real exception; they really have been open in trying to build the industry. But some of their brethren have not been so forthcoming.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.169
Leans Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24

Maria Cantwell

Mr. Hughes, did you want to make a comment?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.8
Coleman-Liau Index
5.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3

Justin Hughes

Yes, Senator Cantwell. You had earlier asked where are we going to get the best solutions, and I think that that is a very legitimate question. I know that this is not an extensive discussion of that draft legislation that we have seen from Senators Hollings and Stevens, but Senator Specter pointed out that the decision about antitrust law in that draft legislation is to be made by the Secretary of Commerce.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21

Justin Hughes

Well, I used to be in the Department of Commerce and to the best of my knowledge we didn't have any particular expertise in that area. At the same time, while that expertise is in the Antitrust Division of Justice and the FTC, this committee in its oversight function should rely on the expertise you pay for in the Patent and Trademark Office, in the Copyright Office, in the information policy experts at the Justice Department and the science agencies, to watch whether the solutions that are being proposed by the private sector are maintaining the balance in copyright law that this committee has for so long and with so much difficult sought to maintain.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.925
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36

Maria Cantwell

Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0

Maria Cantwell

Well, I know as painful as these hearings might sometimes be, they certainly are illuminating. And no doubt, Mr. Parsons, as you have said, the products and services that the public is yet to reap the benefits of are incredible. And how they will help our economy and change our culture probably is not really known to all of us yet.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17

Maria Cantwell

Thank you for persevering. I think the chairman probably said it, or Senator Hatch, but we will be continuing to monitor this issue. Maybe a little more progress would be made, I think, for the music industry if we had a hearing every 7 to 12 months. Maybe at the next hearing we have, we will have a little more of a report and a little more progress, but we thank you for being here today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.907
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12

Maria Cantwell

The Senate Judiciary Committee is adjourned.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.4
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4

Note

[Senate Hearing 107-905] [From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10481
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2749