Fact
ba
.
se
S. Hrg. 109-277 - Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Samuel A. Alito, Jr. to Be An Associate Justice of the...
Topics
Entities
Moderation
Speakers
Topics
No topics found
Entities
No entities found
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Full Transcript
Arlen Specter
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. The Senate Judiciary Committee will now proceed to the confirmation hearing of Judge Samuel Alito, Jr. for the Supreme Court of the United States. A few matters of administration or housekeeping, and then we will proceed to the opening statements.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.856
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2484301338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1435515122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0725631951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0175811947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0119167911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0096460295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016400634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0014939465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011147836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001738201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.09165E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.364
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Arlen Specter
Today we will hear first from Judge Alito -- the introduction of his family. Judge, the floor is yours to introduce your family.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.2519082977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1467994647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0726080209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0180463685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0119507022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0097061056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016598244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0014959767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011243384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001755448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.17669E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.33
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Judge Altio
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Let me introduce my wife, Martha, who is here today; and my sister, Rosemary, who is a lawyer in New Jersey and a tough trial lawyer. I am glad that she took time from her schedule to come to the hearing today. My daughter, Laura, who is a senior at James Caldwell High School in West Caldwell, New Jersey; and if a father can be permitted to brag for a second, a really great swimmer who led her high school team to win the county championship last week. My son, Phillip, who is a second-year student at the University of Virginia. And when I had my confirmation hearing for the Court of Appeals, Phillip was 3 years old. And when I was called up to the chair, he took it upon himself to run up and sit next to me in case any hard questions came up.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.94
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.006522044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016454163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014592826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004800008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002996941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.15576E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.73485E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.04565E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.374E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.284E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Issue > Family
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.296
Code:
14006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14006000
Wikidata_id:
Q8436
Wikidata_label:
family
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Education > School
Score:
52
Magnitude:
0.154
Code:
5005000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/05005000
Wikidata_id:
Q3914
Wikidata_label:
school
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
7.4
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Note
[Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0226780292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0149188578
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0133780399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0046961253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022193843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0019256453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.7489E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.89466E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.6513E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.5333E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2725E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Judge Altio
I don't know whether he is going to try the same thing tomorrow, but probably I could use the help.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.55
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1164610498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1018413575
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0622959866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0228362711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022948921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016600208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003824106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.56183E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.5328E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.11903E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.42534E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Arts, Culture and Entertainment > Mass Media > Reviews
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.087
Code:
1026004
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/01026004
Wikidata_id:
Q2018526
Wikidata_label:
arts
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Judge Altio
I am glad that my in-laws are able to be here today: my father-in-law, Gene Bomgardner, who is a retired Air Force NCO; and my mother-in-law, Barbara Bomgardner, who is a retired Air Force librarian. And my cousins Andrew and Aldomar Kiriev from Gwynedd Valley, Pennsylvania, are also here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0098471479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0073875402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0055183129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054658922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005094946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001027214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004053175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001207681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.62372E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2605E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6362E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Issue > Family
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
14006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14006000
Wikidata_id:
Q8436
Wikidata_label:
family
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Judge Altio
My mother, who turned 91 a couple of weeks ago, unfortunately is not able to be here today, but I am sure she is watching at home.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.307
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0183844168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0099751138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015786489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00116377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005935001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002272469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002121939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.3086E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.91606E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.70282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6563E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Lifestyle and Leisure > Lifestyle (House and Home)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.099
Code:
10009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/10009000
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Soccer
Score:
78
Magnitude:
0.077
Code:
15054000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15054000
Wikidata_id:
Q2736
Wikidata_label:
association football
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
5.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Judge Altio
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0180891424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.015404592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0050978575
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0046096262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012993689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007187947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004565426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001866239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.72383E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.46543E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.32541E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Well, thank you, Judge Alito. You have a beautiful family, and we are delighted to have them with us on the confirmation proceedings.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.896
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0750444073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0491664454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0038735354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032550368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009900457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008306765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002233531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001862065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.62669E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.86242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.0417E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.064
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Arlen Specter
We will have 10-minute rounds of opening statements, each Senator 10 minutes. We will then turn to the presenters, those who will be presenting Judge Alito formally to the Committee. And then we will administer the oath to Judge Alito, and we will hear his testimony.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.017498777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0162497614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095536183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0071748858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026003067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020466192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000350017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003260829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002848588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.39331E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.90679E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.421
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Arlen Specter
We will begin tomorrow morning at 9:30 for the opening round of questions. Each Senator will have 30 minutes on the opening round, and we have a second round scheduled of 20 minutes for each Senator. And then we will see how we will proceed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
2.1215053275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.4953565076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.233343686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1338399947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.1172713703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0742821721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0479030045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.013129595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.011626097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0025054313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015545156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Human Interest > Society > Ceremony
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.143
Code:
8005001
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/08005001
Wikidata_id:
Q2627975
Wikidata_label:
ceremony
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
93
Magnitude:
0.133
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Arlen Specter
Our practice is to adhere to the time limits, and we do that for a number of reasons. One of them is that Senators come and go, and if we maintain the schedule, which is known to everybody, they know when to return for their next round of questions. We will take 15-minute breaks at a convenient time, and, again, we will hold the breaks to 15 minutes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.092037447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0446556864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005930489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025580439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020962436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010817983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004677214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003145158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.13287E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.302E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.253E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.138
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Labor > Labor Legislation
Score:
62
Magnitude:
0.086
Code:
9005000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/09005000
Wikidata_id:
Q7498399
Wikidata_label:
Category:Labour law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.2
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Arlen Specter
I have worked closely with Senator Leahy on scheduling matters and all other matters, and this is the model that we used for the confirmation of Chief Justice Roberts. It is our intention to conclude the hearings this week, and as Senator Leahy and I worked out, the arrangement is to have a markup on Tuesday, January the 17th, subject to something extraordinary happening.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.5212699529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.4001976922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.3096162342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0396543066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0062649946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018725372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001666809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.11615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.49216E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.8717E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.3593E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.131
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
59
Magnitude:
0.077
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Arlen Specter
Now let me yield to the distinguished Ranking Member, Senator Leahy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2592289587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1663956908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.078467495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.035230504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0099766556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0096353935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0036741676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000794171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004804281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001442609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.01464E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.12
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Patrick Leahy
Well, Mr. Chairman, I don't want to hold up your opening statement, or the others. I do appreciate people being here. As the hearing for Chief Justice John Roberts showed, there will be real questions asked. I would hope Senators on both sides of the aisle would do that. I think it is important. We are talking about a position representing 295 million Americans.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.896
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0586390845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0467641512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0188169171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0154409005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0110551708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006832187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006106206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004690579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003491099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001538443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.18494E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.097
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
83
Magnitude:
0.08
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Crime > Theft
Score:
75
Magnitude:
0.072
Code:
2001003
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02001003
Wikidata_id:
Q2727213
Wikidata_label:
theft
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
74
Magnitude:
0.072
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Trials
Score:
71
Magnitude:
0.069
Code:
2008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02008000
Wikidata_id:
Q8016240
Wikidata_label:
trial
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Patrick Leahy
On the schedule, I will work with the senior Senator from Pennsylvania, the Chairman. I understand one of our leaders once said that getting Senators to all move in order is like having bullfrogs in a wheelbarrow. But we will continue to work towards that, and I think the most important thing is we have a good, solid hearing this week.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.794
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0487433193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0411740155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0335867167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.022681315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042930737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006177882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002023489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001377991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000107687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.75281E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.4957E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.199
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Patrick Leahy
Mr. Chairman, you have been totally fair in your procedures for this, as always.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.374
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0245411124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0069267793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034562458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032373358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012413863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004682645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001732044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.47923E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.43044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.54269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.52229E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Patrick Leahy
HON. ARLEN SPECTER
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.050130731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.023122564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0100850171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0075012998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007906631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003375603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003131665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001524187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001496688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001400892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1457E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.3
Gunning-Fog Score
0.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Patrick Leahy
HON. ARLEN SPECTER
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.03262799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0121970887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0090255518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0050763858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.004158595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017270397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010351361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005207228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001399803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.40575E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.53761E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.3
Gunning-Fog Score
0.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Arlen Specter
OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. ARLEN SPECTER A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0368101202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.026641108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0100781639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0067061286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007310149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000232519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.69E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.70702E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7056E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.4538E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5617E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.4
Gunning-Fog Score
4.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
2.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Arlen Specter
Thank you very much, Senator Leahy. And now we begin the opening statements.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.014281155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0064443564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0036246205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023635037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013273917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003353329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002354996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.1242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.04382E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2706E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8974E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.138
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.6
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Arlen Specter
No Senator's vote, except for the declaration of war or the authorization for the use of force, is more important than the confirmation of a nominee to the Supreme Court for a lifetime appointment. Judge Alito comes to this proceeding with extensive experience as a Government lawyer, as a prosecutor, and as a judge. He has written some 361 opinions. He has voted in more than 4,800 cases. And it is possible to select a few of his cases to place him at any and every position on the judicial spectrum. By selecting the right cases, he could look like a flaming liberal or he could look like an arch- conservative.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.552
Very Positive
Moderation
Hate
0.0163321209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0134852031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0072830786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0057024219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019900892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015191999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003465768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.29253E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.63071E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8106E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.665E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Arlen Specter
This hearing will give Judge Alito the full opportunity to address the concerns of 280 million Americans on probing questions which will be put to him by 18 Senators representing their diverse constituencies. I have reserved my own vote on this nomination until the hearing is concluded. I am committed as Chairman to a full, fair, and dignified hearing. Hearings for a Supreme Court nominee should not have a political tilt for either Republicans or Democrats. They should be in substance and in perception for all Americans.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.919
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0241538437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0088366687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0069322246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047545884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026963566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00118428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006374943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.55927E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.78398E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.24711E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.0462E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.239
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Arlen Specter
There is no firmly established rule as to how much a nominee must say to be confirmed. While I personally consider it inappropriate to ask the nominee how he would vote on a specific matter likely to come before the Court, Senators may ask whatever they choose, and the nominee is similarly free to respond as he chooses. It has been my experience that the hearings are really, in effect, a subtle minuet, with the nominee answering as many questions as he thinks necessary in order to be confirmed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0388106972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0168237559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0095688716
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040108956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002470238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022919352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008273284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.21447E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.68943E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.4043E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.6003E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.286
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
57
Magnitude:
0.163
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
52
Magnitude:
0.149
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Arlen Specter
Last year, when President Bush had two vacancies to fill, there was concern expressed that there might be an ideological change in the Court. The preliminary indications from Chief Justice Roberts's performance on the Court and his Judiciary Committee testimony on modesty, stability, and not jolting the system all suggest that he will not move the Court in a different direction. If that holds true, Judge Alito, if confirmed, may not be the swing vote regardless of what position Judge Alito takes on the political spectrum.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0654597417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0285697111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0142040968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0059979262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0051713472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.17763E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.78718E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.37082E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.06748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4365E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.952E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.931
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40
Gunning-Fog Score
17.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Arlen Specter
Perhaps the dominant issue in these hearings is the widespread concern about Judge Alito's position on a woman's right to choose. This has arisen in part because of a 1985 statement made by Judge Alito that the Constitution does not provide for the right to an abortion. It has arisen in part because of his advocacy in the Solicitor General's office seeking to limit or overrule Roe and from the dissenting portion of his opinion in Casey v. Planned Parenthood in the Third Circuit.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2574096899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0469805382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0170183688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0091848291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0065202345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020199364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0017500588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009870516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005518526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000277195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000107344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.292
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Arlen Specter
This hearing will give Judge Alito the public forum to address the issue as he has with Senators in private meetings, that his personal views and prior advocacy will not determine his judicial decisions, but instead he will weigh factors such as stare decisis, that is, what are the precedents; that he will weigh women's and men's reliance on Roe and he will consider too whether Roe is "embedded in the culture of our Nation."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0773995416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0599067251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049463339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041055762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021484539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009840459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001286339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1381E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.8196E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3294E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.853E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.169
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
2.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Arlen Specter
The history of the Court is full of surprises on the issue. The major case upholding Roe was Casey v. Planned Parenthood, where the landmark opinion was written jointly by three Justices, Justice O'Connor, Justice Kennedy and Justice Souter. Before coming to the Court, Justice Souter, Justice Kennedy and Justice O'Connor, had all expressed views against a woman's right to choose. David Souter, as Attorney General of New Hampshire, even opposed changing New Hampshire's law prohibiting abortion even after the Supreme Court of the United States had declared it unconstitutional. At the time of Justice Souter's confirmation hearing, there was a stop Souter rally of the National Organization for Women a few blocks from where we currently are holding this hearing, displaying in red a banner "Stop Souter or Women Will Die," "Stop Souter Rally, a Mass Lobbying Day," somewhat similar to this morning's press where banners are paraded in front of the Supreme Court "Save Roe" and a brochure circulated again by NOW, "Save Women's Lives, Vote No on Alito."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.73089
VADER
0.983
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0451710686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0183596974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0154846173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0137974363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.004882229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0040320341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004011792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001563987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.39424E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.62927E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.3367E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.375
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
69
Magnitude:
0.259
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
65
Sprache Difficult Word Count
60
Arlen Specter
The history of this issue has been one full of surprises. This hearing comes at a time of great national concern about the balance between civil rights and the President's national security authority. The President's constitutional powers as commander in chief to conduct electronic surveillance appear to conflict with what Congress has said in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. This conflict involves very major considerations raised by Justice Jackson's historic concurrence in the Youngstown Steel seizure cases, where Justice Jackson wrote, "When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right, and all that Congress can delegate. When the President acts in absence of a congressional grant of authority, he can rely only upon his own independent powers. When the President takes measures incompatible with the express or implied will of Congress, his power is at its lowest ebb." And as Justice Jackson noted, "What is at stake is the equilibrium established in our constitutional system."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.66329
VADER
0.958
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1510807662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0369117624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0113034461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.006392959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042442171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027196011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005330804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004882176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004876504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003651814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.19211E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.586
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
52
Magnitude:
0.302
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
66
Sprache Difficult Word Count
56
Arlen Specter
Another major area of concern is congressional power, and in recent decisions the Supreme Court of the United States has declared Acts of Congress unconstitutional, really denigrating the role of Congress. In declaring unconstitutional legislation designed to protect women against violence, the Supreme Court did so notwithstanding a voluminous record in support of that legislation, but because of Congress's "method of reasoning," rather insulting to suggest that there is some superior method of reasoning in the Court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.723
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2332953038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0460784184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0245083065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0221325827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.010313309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009009467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003791857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002919501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001829057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.92209E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.41286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Laws
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.281
Code:
2006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02006000
Wikidata_id:
Q7748
Wikidata_label:
law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
89
Magnitude:
0.249
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > International Law
Score:
59
Magnitude:
0.166
Code:
2011000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02011000
Wikidata_id:
Q4394526
Wikidata_label:
international law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Trials
Score:
53
Magnitude:
0.149
Code:
2008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02008000
Wikidata_id:
Q8016240
Wikidata_label:
trial
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
4.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Arlen Specter
When the Supreme Court handled two cases recently on the Americans with Disabilities Act, they upheld the Act as it applied to discrimination as to access, and declared it unconstitutional as it applied to discrimination in employment. They did so by applying a test of what is called "congruent and proportionate," which candidly stated, no one can figure out. In dissent, Justice Scalia called it a flabby test, where the Court set itself up as the taskmaster to see if Congress had done its homework, and Justice Scalia said that it was an invitation to judicial arbitrariness by policy driven decisionmaking, and this hearing, I know, will involve consideration as to Judge Alito's views on congressional power.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.848
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0529923767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0118659482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072866358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032546395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013705423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010568637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004759453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002218907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.27228E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.21838E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.9076E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.503
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
20.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
Arlen Specter
There is reason to believe that our Senate confirmation hearings may be having an effect on Supreme Court nominees on their later judicial duties. Years after their hearings, Supreme Court Justices talk to me about our dialogs at these hearings. This process has now evolved to a point where nominees meet most of the Senators. In this process, nominees get an earful. While no promises are extracted, statements are made by nominees which may well influence their judicial decisions. Chief Justice Roberts, for example, will have a tough time giving a jolt to the system after preaching modesty and stability. There is, I think, a heavy sense of drama as these hearings begin. This is the quintessential example of separation of powers under our constitutional process, as the President nominates, the Senate confirms or rejects, and the successful nominee ascends to the bench. While it may be a bit presumptuous, I believe the Framers, if they were here, would be proud and pleased to see how well their Constitution is being applied.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.47368
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.47368
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.9694
VADER
0.971
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0068926151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037659567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009009767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008368228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006504342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001738768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001505199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.83452E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.91769E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7792E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9347E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.385
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Prosecution
Score:
91
Magnitude:
0.349
Code:
2009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02009000
Wikidata_id:
Q6559173
Wikidata_label:
prosecution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
51
Sprache Difficult Word Count
50
Arlen Specter
My red light just went on, and I now yield to my distinguished colleague, Senator Leahy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0206694065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0064870786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0062181825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028078824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018204142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013959378
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001652925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.0043E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.91748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.57839E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2867E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.126
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Patrick Leahy
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0287709176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0097049677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0058155238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014281105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009405905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001251049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.56352E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.90759E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.17784E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.6453E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5221E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Patrick Leahy
Good afternoon, Judge and Mrs. Alito, and the others.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0177307724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0097270458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036504502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0019039591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004168044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001667173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.65327E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.97157E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.12354E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.0476E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2831E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.141
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Patrick Leahy
Following up on what the Chairman was saying, the challenge for Judge Alito in the course of these hearings is to demonstrate that he is going to protect the rights and liberties of all Americans, and in doing that, serve as an effective check on Government overreaching. I have said that the President did not help his cause by withdrawing his earlier nomination of Harriet Miers in the face of criticism from a narrow faction of his own party who were concerned about how she might vote.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
0.823
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0136525981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0066057306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0062048661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016208542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005387781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002340023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001093777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001021549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.42757E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.74346E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.0213E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.243
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
51
Magnitude:
0.123
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Patrick Leahy
Supreme Court nominations should not be conducted through a series of winks and nods designed to reassure a small faction of our population, while leaving the American people in the dark. And no President, I think we would all agree, should be allowed to pack the courts, and especially the Supreme Court, with nominees selected to enshrine Presidential claims of Government power. The checks and balances that should be provided by the courts, Congress and the Constitution are too important to be sacrificed to a narrow partisan agenda.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.9
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.5611169618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.370256952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1957301982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0256640633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0143995858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0074376359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003123323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0022434324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021115886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005386446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.7939E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.393
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.5
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Patrick Leahy
This hearing is the opportunity for the American people to learn what Samuel Alito thinks about their fundamental constitutional rights and whether he -- you, Judge -- will protect their liberty, their privacy and their autonomy from Government intrusion.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.832
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4899792373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2788915532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1758576022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0246507203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0136315241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0066494023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002722004
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0019582538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0017542479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003533073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.3506E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.336
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Patrick Leahy
The Supreme Court belongs to all Americans, not just to the person occupying the White House, and not just to a narrow faction of either political party, because the Supreme Court is our ultimate check and balance. Independence of the Court and its members is crucial to our democracy and our way of life, and the Senate should never be allowed to be a rubber stamp. Neither should the Supreme Court. So I will ask the Judge to demonstrate his independence from the interests of the President nominating him. This is a nomination to a lifetime seat on the Nation's highest Court. It is a seat that has often represented the decisive vote on constitutional issues, so we have to make an informed decision. That means knowing more about Samuel Alito's work in the Government and knowing more about his views.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.3673
VADER
0.901
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0034793222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0023958557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013583021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006615956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004805628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002258217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.17404E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.2847E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.629E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.205E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.71E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.941
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41
Patrick Leahy
I will, as the Judge knows, ask about the disturbing application he wrote to become a political appointee in the Meese Justice Department. In that application he professed concern with the fundamental principle of "one person, one vote," a principle of the equality that is the bedrock of our laws. This hearing is the only opportunity that the American people and their representatives have to consider the suitability of the nominee to serve as a final arbiter on the meaning of the Constitution and its laws. Has he demonstrated commitment to the fundamental rights of all Americans? Would he allow the Government to intrude on Americans' personal privacy and freedoms?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57895
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.23676
VADER
0.839
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.024889817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0069656482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034975423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032719989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012504976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004730854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001727315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.5434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.47396E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.53665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.52019E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.407
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
76
Magnitude:
0.31
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37
Patrick Leahy
In a time when this administration seems intent on accumulating unchecked power, Judge Alito's views on Executive power are especially important. It is important to know whether he would serve with judicial independence or as a surrogate for the President nominating him. So this public conversation, this hearing over the next few days is extremely important. It is the people's Constitution and the people's right that we are all charged with protecting and preserving. In this hearing we embark on the constitutional process, one that was designed to protect these rights and has served this country so very well for more than two centuries.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.693
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0133730544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034521479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032195774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030776653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001578664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005062174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001501709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.25183E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.53152E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4126E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.716E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.303
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Prosecution
Score:
53
Magnitude:
0.16
Code:
2009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02009000
Wikidata_id:
Q6559173
Wikidata_label:
prosecution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Patrick Leahy
I am reminded of a photograph, Mr. Chairman, that hangs in the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. It shows the first women ever to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States taking the oath of office in 1981. How Justice Sandra Day O'Connor serves is as a model Supreme Court Justice, widely recognized as a jurist with practical values and a sense of the consequences of the legal decisions being made by the Supreme Court. I regret that some on the extreme right have been so critical of Justice O'Connor, and that they adamantly oppose the naming of a successor who shares her judicial philosophy and qualities. Their criticism actually reflects poorly upon them. It does nothing to tarnish the record of the first woman to serve as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. She is a Justice whose graciousness and sense of duty fuels her continued service, even agreeing to serve more than 6 months after her retirement date, and I know both you and I commend her for that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.18519
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.18519
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36101
VADER
0.993
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0134931644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0109143402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.006280368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0051930176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.004978276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003191538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001998081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.751E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.41072E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4127E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.232E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
52
Magnitude:
0.519
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
52
Sprache Difficult Word Count
58
Patrick Leahy
The Court that serves America should reflect America. This nomination was an opportunity, of course, for the President to make a nomination based on diversity. He did not, even though there is no dearth of highly qualified Hispanics and African- Americans, other individuals who could well have served as unifying nominees while adding to diversity. But that, of course, is the President's choice, Judge, not yours. But I look forward to a time when the membership of the Supreme Court is more reflective of the country it serves.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.26826
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0098090051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0063198393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043151354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007004719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005611864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000156239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001303533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.62777E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.17892E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6506E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.6056E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.374
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Patrick Leahy
As the Senate begins its consideration of President Bush's nominee, his third to this seat, to Justice O'Connor's seat, we do so mindful of her critical role in the Supreme Court. Her legacy is one of fairness, and when I decide how to vote it is because I want to see that legacy preserved. Justice O'Connor has been a guardian of the protections the Constitution provides the American people. She has come to provide balance and a check on Government intrusion into our personal privacy and freedoms. In the Hamdi decision she rejected the Bush administration's claim that they could indefinitely detain a United States citizen. She upheld the fundamental principle of judicial review over the exercise of Government power, and she wrote -- and this is one we should all remember -- she wrote that even war is not a blank check for the President when it comes to the rights of the Nation's citizens. She held that even this President is not above the law, and of course, no President, Democratic or Republican, no President is above the law, as neither are you, nor I, nor anyone in this room.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.80235
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0116749106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0106182131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037262213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024594556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008886147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008313193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.31989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.34876E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.91224E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7395E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.4162E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.78
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General)
Score:
67
Magnitude:
0.519
Code:
11024000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024000
Wikidata_id:
Q11827330
Wikidata_label:
political process
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
63
Magnitude:
0.492
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Human Rights
Score:
57
Magnitude:
0.445
Code:
11007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11007000
Wikidata_id:
Q8458
Wikidata_label:
human rights
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
55
Magnitude:
0.429
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
55
Magnitude:
0.427
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.9
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
55
Patrick Leahy
Her judgment has also been critical in protecting our environmental rights. She joined in 5-4 majorities affirming reproductive freedom, and religious freedom, and the Voting Rights Act. I mention each of these cases because they show how important a single Supreme Court Justice is, and it is crucial that we determine what kind of Justice Samuel Alito would be if confirmed. Of course, Judge, my question will be, will you be an independent jurist?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.27297
VADER
0.95
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0061780018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013608966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012077331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003946203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003573121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.04981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.41175E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.1452E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.0002E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.927E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.02E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Patrick Leahy
It is as the elected representatives of the American people, all of the people, nearly 300 million people, that we in the Senate are charged with the responsibility to examine whether to entrust their precious rights and liberties to this nominee. The Constitution is their document. It guarantees their rights from the heavy hand of Government intrusion, and individual liberties, to freedom of speech, to religion, to equal treatment, to due process and to privacy. Actually, this hearing, this is their process. The Federal Judiciary is unlike the other branches of Government. Once confirmed, a Federal Judge serves for life, and there is no court above the Supreme Court. The American people deserve a Supreme Court Justice who can demonstrate that he or she will not be beholden to the President, but only to the law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.921
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0507829944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0135596012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050567647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0026557496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012643693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011775028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.9382E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.03085E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.97995E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.46645E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.3199E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
57
Magnitude:
0.568
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45
Patrick Leahy
Last October, the President succumbed to partisan pressure from the extreme right of his party by withdrawing Harriet Miers. By withdrawing her nomination and substituting this one, the President has allowed his choice to be vetoed by an extreme faction within his party before even a hearing or a vote. Frankly, that was an eye-opening experience to me. It gives the impression there are those who do not want an independent Federal Judiciary. They demand judges who will guarantee the results that they want, and that is why the questions will be asked so specifically of you, Judge.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.702
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0043903899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003641309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031888467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023009536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004123926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003991314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.03721E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.78258E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1939E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.7161E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3739E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.318
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
53
Magnitude:
0.169
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Patrick Leahy
The nomination is being considered against the backdrop of another recent revelation, that the President has, outside the law, been conducting secret and warrantless spying on Americans for more than 4 years. This is a time when the protections of America's liberties are directly at risk, as are the checks and balances that serve to constrain abuses of power for more than 200 years. The Supreme Court is relied upon by all of us to protect our fundamental rights.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.31015
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0939917867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0098485572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0090641835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014426765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012659426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008827461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000782289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004648625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003894237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003042583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8948E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.156
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Espionage and Intelligence
Score:
93
Magnitude:
0.146
Code:
11004000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11004000
Wikidata_id:
Q165950
Wikidata_label:
espionage
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
90
Magnitude:
0.14
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Abusive Behavior
Score:
75
Magnitude:
0.118
Code:
14022000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14022000
Wikidata_id:
Q600571
Wikidata_label:
abuse
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Basketball
Score:
54
Magnitude:
0.084
Code:
15008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15008000
Wikidata_id:
Q5372
Wikidata_label:
basketball
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Patrick Leahy
I have not decided how I will vote in this nomination, and like the Chairman, I will base my determination on the whole record at the conclusion of these hearings, just as I did in connection with the nomination of John Roberts to be Chief Justice. At the conclusion of those hearings I determined to vote for him.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.875
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0119089193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0051848274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.002978828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010573173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006838067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004489612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003576605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.25874E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.53166E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.6092E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.404E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.371
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Patrick Leahy
The stakes for the American people could not be higher. At this critical moment, Senate Democrats serving on this Committee will perform our constitutional advice and consent responsibility with heightened vigilance. I would urge all Senators, Republicans and Democrats and Independents, to join with us in serious consideration. The appointment of the next Supreme Court Justice must be made in the people's interest and in the Nation's interest, not in the interest of any partisan faction.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.935
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0101534417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0059840375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0056582052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016909831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009660174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005593943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.99523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.893E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2911E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6777E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.26E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.305
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
67
Magnitude:
0.205
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Patrick Leahy
Mr. Chairman, Thank you very much.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0130588363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017548702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001588138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013616755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0009483681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000338612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001178601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.8388E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.44E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.256E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.02E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Thank you very much, Senator Leahy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2037027851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0343565363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0304113317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0046984722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0044336801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014566242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003208897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000202853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.02547E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6174E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.22346E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.137
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.7
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Hatch.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0039196948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033695749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027689659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012111957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011599342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008910357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004669846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.19198E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.05362E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8004E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.099E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
HON. ORRIN G. HATCH
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0248099008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0037151298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.00262759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0013589382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010238623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004361569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004051694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.02234E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.10842E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.5419E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.781E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.7
Gunning-Fog Score
0.5
Coleman-Liau Index
4.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Arlen Specter
HON. ORRIN G. HATCH
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0343823893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0116355346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0057862602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0040729523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00027795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001818354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001616937
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001390117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001112724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.5025E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.8361E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.7
Gunning-Fog Score
0.5
Coleman-Liau Index
4.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Orrin Hatch
OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. ORRIN G. HATCH A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF UTAH
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Hate
0.0441542419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0270161137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0149233543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050359322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016928192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003495483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.0291E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.36755E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.98069E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2811E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.774E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
82
Gunning-Fog Score
3.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
6.9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Orrin Hatch
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0266153365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0146022183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045480592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003136172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004522482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001363138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.43566E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.71032E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.13499E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.1672E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.525E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Orrin Hatch
I welcome you, Judge Alito, your family members, friends and others who are accompanying you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0353547599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0345568988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0101675978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0066280307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034926896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007484023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005044093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002818111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001485627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.37617E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.50247E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.186
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Orrin Hatch
This hearing is part of an ongoing evaluation of Judge Samuel Alito's nomination to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. It is remarkable that after a nearly record-long period without a Supreme Court vacancy, we are here considering a second nominee in less than 6 months.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.944
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0251063233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00698043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035266105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032814325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012603989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004780492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001796849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.70822E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.65823E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.63155E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.57597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.646
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Orrin Hatch
Mr. Chairman, let me first commend you for firmly and fairly handling these hearings. The timetable we are following reflects your efforts to accommodate all sides, and the 70 days since President Bush announced the nomination significantly exceeds the average for other Supreme Court nominees.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.758
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.014693859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027131069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018492379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0014400826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001439848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.40022E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.44069E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.73909E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.26399E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.9004E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.6559E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Labor > Labor Legislation
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.086
Code:
9005000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/09005000
Wikidata_id:
Q7498399
Wikidata_label:
Category:Labour law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
94
Magnitude:
0.081
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Orrin Hatch
The debate over this and other judicial nominations is a debate over the judiciary itself. It is a debate over how much power unelected judges should have in our system of government, how much control judges should have over a written Constitution that belongs to the people. Ending up in the right place in this debate requires starting in the right place. The right place to start is the proper description of what judges are supposed to do, and the rest of the process should reflect this judicial job description.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0137719617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0031622942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020365807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017106759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001233788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000181183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001262892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001038984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.2161E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.8947E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.4075E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.64
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Orrin Hatch
The process for evaluating Judge Alito's nomination began when President Bush announced it more than 2 months ago. It continued with Judge Alito's meetings with more than two-thirds of the Senators and a vigorous debate in the media among analysts, scholars, and activists. As the Senate completes the evaluation process, we must keep some very important principles in mind and follow a few basic rules.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.265
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0246459502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00700807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035505425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032392905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012536606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004768808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001755227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.56979E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.56958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.60028E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.56666E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.514
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Orrin Hatch
The first principle is that in this judicial selection process, the Senate and the President have different roles. Under the Constitution, the President, not the Senate, nominates and appoints judges. The Senate has a different role. We must give our advice about whether President Bush should actually appoint Judge Alito by giving or withholding our consent. Abiding by the Constitution's design and our own historical tradition requires that after Judge Alito's nomination reaches the Senate floor, we vigorously debate it and then vote up or down.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.41176
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.41176
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.82098
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0062246669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0056486137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0048461137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017281767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006480418
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005266905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004954544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001087055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.21697E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.03126E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.38E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.805
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
58
Magnitude:
0.465
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Orrin Hatch
The second principle is that in our system of Government the judicial and legislative branches have different roles. As Chief Justice Roberts described it when he was before this Committee last fall, "Judges are not politicians. Judges must decide cases, not champion causes. Judges must settle legal disputes, not pursue agendas. Judges must interpret and apply the law, not make the law." This principle that judges are not politicians lies at the very heart of the judicial job description.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.787
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0180449555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0138915217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0085876985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029751034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015686752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008084178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006414173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.83089E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.30684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0379E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1395E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.3
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Orrin Hatch
In addition to these two principles, a few basic rules should guide how we complete this confirmation process. First, we must remember that judicial nominees are constrained in what they may discuss and how they may discuss it. Like Chief Justice Roberts and others before him, Judge Alito is already a Federal judge. He not only will be bound by the canons of judicial ethics as a Supreme Court Justice, he is already bound by these canons as an appeals court judge. Because judges may not issue advisory opinions, judicial nominees may not do so either, especially on issues likely to come before the Court. That rule has always been honored.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.946
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0214348926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0172908054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0075234784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0044888766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007289265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003416045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.11212E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.36769E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.6025E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.528E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.91E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Orrin Hatch
Needless to say, those who will demand such advisory opinions in this hearing will do so precisely on those issues that are likely to come before the Court. They have a right to ask those questions. But as the Washington Post editorialized just this morning, however, "he will not -- and should not -- tell Americans how he will vote on hotly contested issues."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
-0.128
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0502548413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0389381457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0054234773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040840485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027351316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021265529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004189032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.38867E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.36949E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.7718E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.958E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.131
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Orrin Hatch
When Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg was before us in 1993, she said that her standard was to give no hints, no forecasts, no previews, and declined to answer dozens of questions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.681
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0567400304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0229541067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0212191837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0092390903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049315724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0042091742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009841417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005647804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.61846E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.87038E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.86054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.076
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Orrin Hatch
The second rule we should follow is to consider each part of Judge Alito's record on its own terms for what each part actually is. He wrote memos when he worked for the Justice Department. He has written judicial opinions while on the appeals court. He wrote answers to the questionnaire from this Committee in 1990 and again last year. He has written articles and given speeches. He has joined certain groups, and each of these is different. Each of these must be considered in its own context, on its own terms, rather than squeezed, twisted, and distorted into something designed instead to support a preconceived position or serve a preplanned agenda.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.671
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0187399419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0111274596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0096591648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018568633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007369134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002964707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002877706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.29938E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.4704E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1629E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6836E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.553
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
11.9
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
35
Orrin Hatch
The third rule we should follow is considering Judge Alito's entire record. Some interest groups focus on -- some would say they obsess about -- one recusal question, or they cherrypick from the thousands of cases in which Judge Alito participated and the hundreds of opinions he authored or joined. Or they look at the results that ignore the facts and the law in those cases.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.128
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0302461121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0064264488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.004120564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036516998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0034656921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0024316771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003544828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002084385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001315034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.1653E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.0867E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.363
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Orrin Hatch
Judge Alito comes to us with a record that is long, broad, and deep. He deserves, and our constitutional duty requires, that we consider his entire record.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.3696732223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.3007549793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2565653529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1075885608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0078186451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049164009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0025630055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004026879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001964546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.36564E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.21894E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.237
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Orrin Hatch
Finally, and perhaps most important, we must apply a judicial rather than a political standard to the information before us, and we do have a lot of information. The record includes more than 360 opinions of all kinds -- majority, concurring, and dissenting -- written during his judicial tenure. We have more than 36,000 pages of additional material, including unpublished opinions, legal briefs, articles, speeches, and Department of Justice documents relating to his service in the Office of Legal Counsel and in the Solicitor General's office. We must apply a judicial, not a political, standard to this record. Asking a judicial nominee whose side you will be on in future cases is a political standard. Evaluating Judge Alito's record by asking those whose side he has been on in past cases is, again, a political standard.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.61905
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.61905
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.35812
VADER
0.755
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0214689499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0192624735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002181558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019130723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010743956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006821509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001241333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.49645E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.4218E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.3617E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.881
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
45
Sprache Difficult Word Count
39
Orrin Hatch
Scorecards are common in the political process, but they are inappropriate in the judicial process. The most important tools in the judicial confirmation process are not litmus paper and a calculator. Applying a proper judicial standard to Judge Alito's record means putting aside the scorecards and looking at how he does what judges are supposed to do, namely, settle legal disputes by applying already established law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.177
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0563736598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0435564929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0391827314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0194615597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0051498562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014022594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.21215E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.51515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.13755E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.0994E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.8421E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Prosecution
Score:
79
Magnitude:
0.795
Code:
2009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02009000
Wikidata_id:
Q6559173
Wikidata_label:
prosecution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Orrin Hatch
A judicial standard means that a judicial decision can be entirely correct even when the result does not line up with our preferred political positions or cater to certain political interests. When he was here last fall, Chief Justice Roberts compared judges to umpires who apply rules they did not write and cannot change to the competition before them. We do not evaluate an umpire's performance based on which team won the game, but on how that umpire applied the rules inning after inning. We do not hire umpires by showing them the roster for the upcoming season and demanding to know which teams they will favor before those teams even take the field. Similarly, we should evaluate judges and judicial nominees based on the general process for applying the law to any legal disputes, not on the specific result in a particular case or dispute.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.02165
VADER
0.329
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
4.6621620655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1118450426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0603451917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.01486619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018027271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012494413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008187002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003238954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002765492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001593114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.7937E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Prosecution
Score:
63
Magnitude:
0.635
Code:
2009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02009000
Wikidata_id:
Q6559173
Wikidata_label:
prosecution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44
Orrin Hatch
The fact that Judge Alito is such a baseball fan gives me even more confidence that he knows the proper role of a judge. I know that there is a pitched battle going on outside the Senate, with dueling press conferences, television ads, e-mail, petition drives, and stacks of reports and press releases. The Senate can rise above that battle if we remember the proper role for the Senate and the proper role for judges. We can rise above that battle if we respect that judicial nominees are limited in what they may discuss. Take each part of Judge Alito's record on its own terms. Consider Judge Alito's entire record and apply a judicial rather than a political standard.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
0.068
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1267552841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0390518602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0076886776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0039958115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0023582013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0022259977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001436238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.1266E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9285E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.76E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.024E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
35
Orrin Hatch
Judge Alito, I know you. I have known you for a long time. You are a good man. You are an exceptional judge as well. I welcome you and your family to this Committee, and I hope that the days ahead will reflect more light than heat. We congratulate you that you are willing to go through this grueling process to represent your country on one of the three separated powers. It means so much to all of us, and I am grateful to personally know you as well as I do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.953
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0381302088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028164803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008288463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008278706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0006990132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002552674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.76982E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.6296E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.8064E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.405E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.44E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.412
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.3
Gunning-Fog Score
7.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.2
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Orrin Hatch
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0551699603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0087298809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0063108841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051591807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0035275018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000817905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008170382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004511278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.31635E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8174E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0927E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Thank you very much, Senator Hatch.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.022610536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0071814778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0062250881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0042375159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0023200086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017073395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008970561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.83364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.2983E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.1429E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.799E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.8
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Kennedy?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0362817576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0296814978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0129935142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0093858333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0067331574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0026064017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007020998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003574161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002345059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.65296E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.89391E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Joe Kennedy III
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0032329979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031960713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020232137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017979661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001371286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.17179E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.62985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.20596E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.42925E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.4611E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.6568E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Joe Kennedy III
Judge Alito, I join in welcoming you and your family to this Committee. I appreciated the opportunity to visit with you in my office a few weeks ago, and I was particularly impressed by your personal family story of how you were encouraged to do well and contribute to your community. And I also applaud your dedication to public service throughout your lifetime.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.951
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0059396691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0046782909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0042159754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00201406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003983785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003808688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001013949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.54204E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.60493E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.19283E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.2136E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.135
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Family
Score:
61
Magnitude:
0.083
Code:
14006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14006000
Wikidata_id:
Q8436
Wikidata_label:
family
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Joe Kennedy III
Supreme Court nominations are an occasion to pause and reflect on the values that make our Nation strong, just, and fair. And we must determine whether a nominee has a demonstrated commitment to those basic values. Will a nominee embrace and uphold the essential meaning of the four words inscribed above the entrance of the Supreme Court Building, "Equal justice under law."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.21888
VADER
0.976
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0142785415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0126878746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0097566233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0064901476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048899175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007401871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001403192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001376953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.82E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5503E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1365E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.775
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Joe Kennedy III
Justice Louis Powell spoke for all of us when he said, "Equal justice under law is perhaps the most inspiring idea of our society. It is one of the ends for which our entire legal system exists."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.885
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0569089898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0011485164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004559273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003853371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.56918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.2452E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.71854E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
4.7328E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.59923E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.61388E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.8908E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.234
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
80
Magnitude:
0.188
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Joe Kennedy III
As we have seen from Justice O'Connor's example, even one Justice can profoundly alter the meaning of those words for our citizens. Even one Justice can deeply affect the rights and liberties of the American people. Even one Justice can advance or reverse the progress of our journey.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.962
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9715962708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7084237188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4051150531
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9449509904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9106568992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6560509559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2244787524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1440920285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.129386934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0909486145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0488112506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Human Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.409
Code:
11007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11007000
Wikidata_id:
Q8458
Wikidata_label:
human rights
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
98
Magnitude:
0.399
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
69
Magnitude:
0.283
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
54
Magnitude:
0.221
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Joe Kennedy III
So the question before us in these hearings is this: does Judge Alito's record hold true to the letter and the spirit of equal justice? Is he committed to the core values of our Constitution that are at the heart of our Nation's progress, and can he truly be evenhanded and fair in his decisions?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.973
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0119057862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0115282637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0101744932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046773312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0044016211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013052919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005288538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001470723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001169958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.17529E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4865E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.49
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Joe Kennedy III
In a way Judge Alito has faced this issue before as a nominee to the Court of Appeals. I had the privilege of chairing his confirmation hearing in 1990, and at that time he had practiced law for 14 years, but only represented one client, the U.S. Government. I asked whether he believed he could be impartial in deciding cases involving the Government, and in that hearing Judge Alito said on the record that the most important quality for a judge is open-mindedness to the arguments, and he promised the Committee that he would make a very conscious effort to be absolutely impartial. We took him at his word and overwhelmingly confirmed him to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.317
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0050071332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0043248248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034410288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020714724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010110292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00030135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001369287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.61635E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.29125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8229E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9967E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.998
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Joe Kennedy III
We now have the record of Judge Alito's 15 years on the bench, and the benefit of some of his earlier writings that were not available 15 years ago, and I regret to say that the record troubles me deeply.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.422
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.2827028977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1085605589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0786168443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0529181794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0064455482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0051990675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0008830669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001277449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.54093E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.84609E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.4556E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.147
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Joe Kennedy III
In a era where the White House is abusing power, is excusing and authorizing torture and is spying on American citizens, I find Judge Alito's support for an all-powerful executive branch to be genuinely troubling. Under the President's spying program there are no checks and balances. There is no outside review of the legality of this brazen infringement on the civil rights and liberties of the American people. Undeterred by the public outcry, the President vows to continue spying on American citizens. Ultimately the courts will make the final judgment whether the White House has gone too far. Independent and impartial judges must assess the proper balance between protecting our liberties and protecting our national security.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.53408
VADER
-0.751
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0495621469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0104732258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045914589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018666622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016678867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000593409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002745492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001569596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001421291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.74609E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2009E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Human Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.503
Code:
11007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11007000
Wikidata_id:
Q8458
Wikidata_label:
human rights
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
87
Magnitude:
0.435
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
78
Magnitude:
0.393
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Espionage and Intelligence
Score:
64
Magnitude:
0.32
Code:
11004000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11004000
Wikidata_id:
Q165950
Wikidata_label:
espionage
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
Joe Kennedy III
I am gravely concerned by Judge Alito's clear record of support for vast Presidential authority unchecked by the other two branches of Government. In decision after decision on the bench, he has excused abusive actions by the authorities that intrude on the personal privacy and freedoms of average Americans, and in his writings and speeches he has supported a level of overreaching Presidential power that, frankly, most Americans find disturbing and even frightening.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.23077
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.23077
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.43532
VADER
-0.659
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0287060626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022015778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002173903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016334405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009340099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.64573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.58762E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.26897E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0945E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.76E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.63E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.278
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
16.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Joe Kennedy III
In fact, it is extraordinary that each of the three individuals this President has nominated for the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts, Harriet Miers and now Judge Alito, has served not only as a lawyer for the executive branch, but as a defendant of the most expansive view of Presidential authority. Perhaps that is why this President nominated them. But as Justice O'Connor stated, even a state of war is not a blank check for a President to do whatever he wants. The Supreme Court must serve as an independent check on abuses by the executive branch and a protector of our liberties, not a cheerleader for an imperial presidency.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.47957
VADER
0.805
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0101725527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0085787688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063792082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0031382722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0008262514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005622236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001567847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001274994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.92943E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.7211E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.921E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.705
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.5
Gunning-Fog Score
17.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Joe Kennedy III
There are other areas of concern. In an era when too many Americans are losing their jobs or working for less, trying to make ends meet, in close cases Judge Alito has ruled the vast majority of the time against the claims of the individual citizens. He has acted instead in favor of Government, large corporations and other powerful interests. In a study by the well-respected expert, Professor Cass Sunstein of the University of Chicago Law School, Judge Alito was found to rule against the individual in 84 percent of his dissents. To put it plainly, average Americans have had a hard time getting a fair shake in his courtroom. In an era when America is still too divided by race and riches, Judge Alito has not written one single opinion on the merits in favor of a person of color alleging race discrimination on the job; in 15 years on the bench, not one.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.1
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.1
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.19106
VADER
0.917
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0121374644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0038649345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0021406106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016221176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008011421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005059394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003837689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.97021E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.33808E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5609E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.6418E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.634
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
46
Joe Kennedy III
When I look at that record in light of the 1985 job application to the Reagan Justice Department, it is even more troubling. That document lays out an ideological agenda that highlights his pride in belonging to an alumni group at Princeton that opposed the admission of women and proposed to curb the admission of racial minorities. It proclaims his legal opinion that the Constitution does not protect the right of women to make their own reproductive decisions. It expresses outright hostility to the basic principle of one person, one vote, affirmed by the Supreme Court as essential to ensuring that all Americans have a voice in their Government. This application was not a youthful indiscretion. It was a document prepared by a mature, 35-year-old professional.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52941
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.764
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.013488713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028958071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015182221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0013890868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009443295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.61241E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.11997E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.7805E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.4578E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2762E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.077E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Issue > Minority Group
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.2
Code:
14010000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14010000
Wikidata_id:
Q769696
Wikidata_label:
national minority
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
96
Magnitude:
0.191
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
92
Magnitude:
0.183
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
91
Magnitude:
0.182
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44
Joe Kennedy III
Finally, many of us are concerned about conflicting statements that Judge Alito has made in response to questions from this Committee and others. As Chairman Specter has stated, this confirmation largely depends on the credibility of Judge Alito's statements to us, and we have questions. When asked about the ideological statements and specific legal opinions in his 1985 application, Judge Alito has dismissed those statements as just applying for a job.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.36772
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.3535123542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0529131328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0144322461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0085412117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0045431476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004115456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001197663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.59602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.39918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.03376E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.6411E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.648
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Joe Kennedy III
When he was before this Committee in 1990 applying for a job to the circuit, he promised under oath that he would recuse himself from cases involving Vanguard, the mutual fund company in which he had most of his investments. But as a judge he participated in a Vanguard case anyway, and has offered many conflicting reasons to explain why he broke his word. We need to get to the bottom of this matter to assure ourselves that what Judge Alito says in these hearings will not be just words, but pledges that guide him in the future if he is confirmed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.54654
VADER
-0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.7415877655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.3662551288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0537298678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0314548903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0121859513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0036440568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0010079341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005264078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003500981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001904699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.57868E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.401
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Joe Kennedy III
Judges are appointed by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and it is our duty to ask questions on great issues that matter to the American people and to speak for them. Many Republican Senators certainly demanded answers from Harriet Miers. We should expect no less from Judge Alito. There is not time for a double standard. If confirmed, Judge Alito could serve on the Court for a generation or more, and the decisions he will make as Justice will have a direct impact on the lives and liberties of our children, our grandchildren and even our great-grandchildren. We have only one chance to get it right, and a solemn obligation to do so.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.016167709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0046289555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033583692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031912165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025418389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020464357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004440583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002762184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002175375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001828412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5897E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Joe Kennedy III
Judge Alito, I have serious questions to ask. I congratulate you on your nomination, and I look forward to your answers in these hearings.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.025468861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0144042686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0088615452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0064628126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014139704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001552658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000100568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.05895E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.12114E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.45862E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.38529E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.244
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Kennedy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.003044527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002762907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026227235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025329098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008336764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004396389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001151929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.2628E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.16579E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.1797E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.931E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.6
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Grassley.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0174283239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0032345306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012673946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007407973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005076925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001099054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.33672E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.28665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.2212E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.0592E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.38E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
STATEMENT OF HON. CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0151546585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0138643009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.001986369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019676492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003372575
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001502598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000146835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.28927E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.09105E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.9175E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2138E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.5
Gunning-Fog Score
4.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
5.8
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Chuck Grassley
I have a much more positive view of Judge Alito.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.595
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0013437289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
8.91891E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.8523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
8.47927E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
2.04994E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.4015E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.3869E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.938E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.595E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.348E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.146E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.183
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
1.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Note
[Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Hate
0.0187056139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0102352249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0095605268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025519161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0022696167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020240457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003514885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001971772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.8761E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7011E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7565E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Chuck Grassley
I think the record will sustain my view. But first, Judge Alito, I welcome you and your proud family to the Committee, and congratulations on your nomination.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.875
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0245410891
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0069267859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034562458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032373358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012413875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004682645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001732044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.47923E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.43044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.54269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5223E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.265
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.3
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Chuck Grassley
I first want to remind all Americans who might be listening that the Senate has a very important responsibility to confirm only well-qualified individuals who will faithfully interpret the law and the Constitution. Confirmation should be limited to those individuals who will be fair, unbiased, devoted to addressing the facts in the law before them without imposing their own values and political beliefs when deciding cases. Nominees should not be expected to precommit to ruling on certain issues in a certain way, nor should Senators ask nominees to pledge to rule on cases in a particular way.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.921
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0728086452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0236664811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0217880923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0121895304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0102635684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0090169655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005829018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002387565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002212475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001115641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.5217E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.085
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
82
Magnitude:
0.069
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
78
Magnitude:
0.066
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Chuck Grassley
If we fulfill our responsibility to the Constitution, the Supreme Court will be filled with superior legal minds who will pursue the one agenda that our Founding Fathers intended in writing the Constitution, justice rather than political or personal goals. The Supreme Court will then consists of individuals who meticulously apply the law and the Constitution regardless of whether the results they reach are popular or not. If we do our job right, the Supreme Court will not be made up of men and women who are on the side of the little guy or the big guy, rather the Supreme Court will be made up of men and women who are on the side of the law and the Constitution.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.88235
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.88235
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.981
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0181421725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0160852753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0074419986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033562879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028840803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018059482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.10106E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.7054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.32608E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.34575E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.1221E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.713
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
77
Magnitude:
0.546
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
63
Magnitude:
0.447
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Chuck Grassley
From all accounts, Judge Alito has an impressive and extensive legal and judicial record, certainly one worthy of someone on the Supreme Court. Judge Alito excelled at top-notch schools, member of law review, clerked for a Federal judge. He also held important positions at the Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, the Solicitor General's Office and was U.S. Attorney for New Jersey before being appointed to the Third Circuit.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.13549
VADER
0.967
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0081438826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0055799454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0029784758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021198104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010831362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005131551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003403561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002408219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001926728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8696E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.897
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Chuck Grassley
I want to remind the American people this nominee, Judge Alito, has been confirmed unanimously by the U.S. Senate, not once, but twice. This is a tremendous record of accomplishment in public service equal to any Supreme Court nominee that I have considered in the 25 years I have been on this Committee. Not only that, Judge Alito has a reputation for being an exceptional and honest judge devoted to the rule of law, as well as being a man of integrity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.964
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.7286787033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0175134148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0092754693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0048352693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004114136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011743695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001787403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.88071E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.16373E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.01325E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.891E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Chuck Grassley
Judge Alito enjoys the support and respect of people who work with him, practice with him, and therefore, know him best. Example, 54 of Judge Alito's law clerks, Democrats, Republicans and Independents alike, signed a letter to the Committee that stated, "We collectively were involved in thousands of cases and it never once appeared to us that Judge Alito has prejudged a case or ruled based on political ideology." Continuing to quote, "It is our uniform experience that Judge Alito was guided by his profound respect for the Constitution and the limited role of the judicial branch." Those 54 opinions say a lot about Judge Alito and his approach to judicial function. Like Chief Justice Roberts, it appears that Judge Alito tries to act like an umpire, calling the balls and strikes, rather than advocating a particular outcome.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52381
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52381
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.966
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0795819098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0468979182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0143730824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0120280449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0087975379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020701927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005321321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000100685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.42809E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.8367E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.923E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
47
Chuck Grassley
I am also impressed with the very complimentary things that some lawyers have had to say about Judge Alito in the Lawyers Evaluation Section of the Almanac of Federal Judiciary. With respect to his legal ability, lawyers praised him, saying that Judge Alito was "exceptional," "a brilliant jurist." Another lawyer stated that, "to say that he is outstanding is to use understatement. He's the best judge on the circuit, maybe in the country."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.981
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.151459605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0165045451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005840923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0040755865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003648936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004528831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.15602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.18091E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.38689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.01995E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0746E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.933
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Chuck Grassley
With respect to his demeanor and temperament, lawyers found Judge Alito to be measured and judicial while on the bench. One lawyer commented that he is demanding, but always courteous. He may occasionally, quoting, "demonstrate a little bit of impatience with lawyers that aren't quite getting it. This can be directed at either side. It's just a sign that his mind is working more efficiently than yours. He's never discourteous, never abusive." Another lawyer said, "He is pleasant and courteous." Others commented about the impression that Judge Alito is a conservative judge, but certainly not out to impose his own personal agenda while on the bench. One lawyer commented that he "is a conservative, but reaches honest decisions," while another said, "By reputation he's known to be one of the more conservative judges on the court, but he is forthright and fair. He tries to decide cases in front of him in the right way."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2381
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2381
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.46262
VADER
0.983
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3004763275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0311176613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0100721598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0084105763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0044568515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007728766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004540408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004495512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002408959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001104852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.97483E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
35
Chuck Grassley
The American Bar Association came out just last week with an evaluation of Judge Alito to be a Justice, and they considered things like integrity, judgment, compassion, open- mindedness and freedom from bias and commitment to equal justice under the law. The ABA once again found Judge Alito to be unanimously well qualified. This recommendation should have much weight for my colleagues on the other side, who have time and time again described the rating of the ABA as, quote, "gold standard." Yet, some liberal interest groups have come out in full force and have attempted to paint Judge Alito to be an extremist and to be an activist. They have criticized a nominee who has, from what I see described by these lawyers and fellow judges, a reputation of being a restrained jurist committed to the rule of law and the Constitution, but that is what these outside-the-mainstream groups always do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.41369
VADER
0.91
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0032419175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028678191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021599521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015444572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0006196511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004438949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003201259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.4107E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.3698E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0005E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.713E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
44
Chuck Grassley
They attack individuals who they believe will not implement their agenda before the Supreme Court, so Judge Alito should see criticism as a badge of honor worn by many past and present members of the Court. Yet, I am glad to see the public fully participate in this process because this is the nature of our system of Government, but I do not like to see facts twisted, untruths fabricated to give the nominee a black eye even before he comes before our Committee.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.28571
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.54654
VADER
0.036
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0300801272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0261897512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0114073213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0079396712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053377797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009556614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004495807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.70313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.84126E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.13251E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.0001E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.393
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Chuck Grassley
So, Judge Alito, now you have that opportunity to set everyone straight on your record and your approach to deciding cases. These hearings are also an opportunity, a very good opportunity to remind the public about the proper role of a judge in our system of checks and balances limited Government. Judges are required by our democratic system not to overstep their positions to become policymakers or super legislators. Supreme Court nominees should know, without any doubt, that their job is not to impose their own personal opinions of what is right and wrong, but to say what the law is, rather than what they personally think the law ought to be. Supreme Court nominees should know that this exercise of judicial restraint is a key ingredient of being a good judge, as the Constitution constrains judges every bit as it constrains we legislators, executives and citizens in their actions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.27444
VADER
0.957
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4075640813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0168890751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024215686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012339481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0010750506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002466601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.30204E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1991E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.8664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.52664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9879E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
46
Chuck Grassley
Moreover, Supreme Court nominees should be individuals who not only understand but truly respect the equal roles and responsibilities of different branches of Government and our State Governments. As Alexander Hamilton said in Federalist No. 78, "The courts must decide the sense of the law, and if they should be disposed to exercise will instead of judgment, the consequences would be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body." Our Framers expected the judicial branch to be the least dangerous branch of Government.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.951
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.010519327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045960584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032208947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009347174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008861283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002331176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.42121E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.37827E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.65853E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.7364E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9339E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.273
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.4
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Chuck Grassley
At our meeting in my office in November, I heard Judge Alito place emphasis on the limited role of the courts in our democratic society. He also reiterated this belief in a questionnaire he submitted to this Committee. So I have some idea of how Judge Alito approaches the law and views the role of a judge. I am hopeful that his commitment to judicial restraint and to confining decisions to the law and the Constitution will shine through in this hearing, and I believe it will, and I am hopeful that my colleagues will give Judge Alito a civil, a fair and a dignified process, as well as an up or down vote, because as always, the Constitution sets the standard: the President nominates, the Senate deliberates, and then we are obligated to give our advice and consent in an up or down vote.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.941
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0023968336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017178099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014076522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009269438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003252462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000144002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001177896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.9911E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7461E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5993E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.642E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41
Chuck Grassley
Judge Alito, I congratulate you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.494
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.143901899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1172236633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0100349236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031817719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013876369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010158104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006243955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000156041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001039151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.67177E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.62728E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Arlen Specter
Thank you very much, Senator Grassley.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0122596466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047419009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045542223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0022087237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020705718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015069966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.001172163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003544392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001014257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.5512E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0265E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.7
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Biden.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0023610077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018509318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.000583876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003548075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.51417E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.37006E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.54633E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.9363E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7131E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1577E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.664E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
STATEMENT OF HON. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0148271021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0114272014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0058228601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023420136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021288193
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003743834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002141909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001423929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001386015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001003434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.65704E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
87.5
Gunning-Fog Score
3.9
Coleman-Liau Index
4.5
SMOG Index
5.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Joe Biden
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.024889817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0069656482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034975423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032719989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012504976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004730854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001727315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.5434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.47396E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.53665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.52019E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Joe Biden
Judge, welcome. Mrs. Alito and your family, welcome. It is an incredible honor to be nominated by a President of the United States to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and you are to be congratulated.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.958
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0254355429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00680382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034186727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028207915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025855616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002723557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000113138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.00314E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2419E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4152E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.114E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.456
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Joe Biden
Judge, this may be one of the most significant, consequential nominations that the Senate will vote on since I have been here in the last three decades. I think history has delivered you, fortunately or unfortunately, to a moment where Supreme Court historians far into the future are going to look back on this nomination and make a judgment whether or not with your nomination, and if you are confirmed, whether the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court begin to change from the consensus that existed the last 70 years, or whether it continued on the same path it has over the past six or seven decades, and that moment is right now.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.27297
VADER
0.782
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0268560136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0201333329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0129294174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0078443278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013509836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006393628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002489875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.93874E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.90114E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.27683E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.9975E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Joe Biden
Lest we think it is kind of like we all go through this process -- and I like the phrase "minuet" that the Chairman used -- we all act like there is not an elephant in the room. The truth of the matter is, there is significant debate among judicial scholars today as to whether or not we have gone off on the wrong path with regard to Supreme Court decisions. There is a very significant dispute that has existed in 5-4 decisions over the past two decades in a Court that is very closely divided on the critical, central issues of the day.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.29412
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.29412
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.57054
VADER
0.673
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0401469413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074318574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0067574387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002937548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021868278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006924447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005688215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004728138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003372845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003034747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.296E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.478
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Prosecution
Score:
70
Magnitude:
0.335
Code:
2009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02009000
Wikidata_id:
Q6559173
Wikidata_label:
prosecution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.2
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Joe Biden
Just to make it clear, I am puzzled by some of the things you have said, and I am sure you are going to get a chance to tell me what you meant by some of the things you wrote and said, but when in your job application you talked about being proud, as you should be, to be proud of your subscription to and adhering to notions put forward in the National Review that you are a proud member of the Federalist Society, the National Conservative Political Action Committee, the American Spectator is something you look to, et cetera. These are all really very bright folks. They all have a very decided opinion on the issues of the day -- very decided. And those very organizations I have named think, for example, we misread the Fifth Amendment and have been misreading it for the past three decades. Those same groups argue that, in fact, there is no right of privacy in the Constitution, et cetera. So people are not making this up. In a sense, it is not about you. You find yourself in the middle of one of the most significant national debates in modern constitutional history because you have been nominated to replace a woman, in addition, who has been the deciding vote on a significant number of these cases. Since 1995 there have been 193 5-4 decisions, and Justice O'Connor 77 percent of the time has been the deciding vote. And for 70 years, there has been a consensus among scholars and the American people on a reading of the Constitution that protects the right of privacy, the autonomy of individuals, while at the same time empowering the Federal Government to protect the less powerful. Only recently has the debate come that States rights are being trumped in a fundamental way, a reading of the 10th Amendment and 11th Amendment. That is a legitimate debate. Totally legitimate. But anybody who pretends that how you read the 10th and 11th Amendment does not have a fundamental impact on the things we care about is kidding themselves. They are either uninformed or they are kidding themselves.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.26025
VADER
0.99
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.746747572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0266765623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0108781089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0101576356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024093441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022164611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0016120044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000689018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006296127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.65042E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.48916E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.427
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
91
Magnitude:
0.389
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parties and Movements
Score:
80
Magnitude:
0.34
Code:
11010000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11010000
Wikidata_id:
Q7278
Wikidata_label:
political party
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
58
Magnitude:
0.247
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
82
Sprache Difficult Word Count
79
Joe Biden
So, Judge, there is a genuine struggle going on well beyond you, well beyond the Congress, in America about how to read the Constitution. And I believe at its core we have a Constitution, as our Supreme Court's first great Justice Marshall said in 1819, and I quote, "intended to endure for the ages to come and consequently to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs." That is the crux of the debate we are having now, whether it is an adaptable Constitution. A lot of my friends make very powerful and convincing arguments -- and they may be right -- that, no, no, no, no, no, it is not adaptable, it is not adaptable. And since our country's founding, we have tried to keep Government's heavy hand out of our personal lives while ensuring that we do the most important thing, which is to protect those who cannot protect themselves. And the debate raging today is about whether we will continue along that path and whether our courts will continue to be one of the places where society puts the little guy -- and I know this is not something you are supposed to say -- the little guy on the same footing with the big guy. The one place David is equal to Goliath is in the Supreme Court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.24171
VADER
0.959
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.059198396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0310237636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083870778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051891511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005739951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004469107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001207469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001115677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001071784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.83571E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.20542E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.525
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
49
Sprache Difficult Word Count
49
Joe Biden
It is also important to note that you are slated to replace the first woman ever nominated to the Supreme Court. We can pretend that is not the fact, but it is. And through no fault of your own, we are cutting the number of women in half on the Court. And now, as I said, that is not your fault, but I think it means that we have to take, at least speaking for myself, a closer look at your stands on issues that are important to women. And, moreover, Justice O'Connor brought critical qualities to the High Court that not everybody thinks are qualities -- I happen to think they are -- her pragmatism and her statecraft. Not that I have always agreed with what she said, far from it, but Justice O'Connor has been properly lauded in my view as a judge who approached her duties with open- mindedness and with a sensitivity to the effects her decisions would have on everyday, ordinary people. She, unlike Judge Bork, did not think that being on the Court would be "an intellectual feast," to quote Judge Bork. Justice O'Connor also brought balance to our highest Court. Most recently, as has been repeated many times, she cautioned about war does not give a blank check. Her decisions reflect, in my view, that our societies work very hard to improve the workaday world, to open doors to workers confronted by powerful employers and for women facing harassment and stereotypes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.4
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.4
Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.76214
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.72213
VADER
0.909
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.5504145287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1303807949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0482038769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.036662849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0078510326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014336423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003441751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003247503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000172168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001699708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.33168E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
47
Sprache Difficult Word Count
56
Joe Biden
Now, I acknowledge this is a very tough job a judge has in determining whether or not there is an openness that is required under the Constitution. But I also acknowledge that prejudice runs very deep in our society, and in the real world, discrimination rears its ugly head in the shadows where it is very difficult to root it out. But Justice O'Connor was not afraid to go into the shadows.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.63599
VADER
-0.652
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0765315199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0514695537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0470793893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0115421681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0027394282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007482868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002881792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001330299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.08745E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.14976E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.2684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.201
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Joe Biden
The Constitution provides for one democratic moment, Judge, before a lifetime of judicial independence when the people of the United States are entitled to know as much as we can about the person that we are about to entrust with safeguarding our future and the future of our kids. And, Judge, simply put, that is this moment, the one democratic moment in a lifetime of absolute judicial independence. And that is what these hearings are about, in my view.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.04452
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.048240897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039234794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037966038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031209442
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022516502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.58293E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.44554E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.62731E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.2231E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.3121E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.6701E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.418
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Joe Biden
In the coming days, we want to know about what you believe, Judge, how you view the Constitution, how you envision the role of the Federal courts, what kind of Justice you would seek to become. As I said, this one democratic moment when the people, through their elected representatives, get to ask questions of a President's choice for the highest Court. And I hope you will be forthcoming.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.629
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0704292557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0041385174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026732929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011756144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011072198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008575091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002863213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001970598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001589228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001035594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.3238E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.764
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Joe Biden
I cannot imagine, notwithstanding what many of my colleagues, whom I have great respect for, believe, I can't imagine the Founders, when they sat down and wrote the document and got to the Appointments Clause and said, You know what? The American people are entitled to know before we make him President, before we make her Senator, before we make him Congressman, what they believe on the major issues of the day. But judges, Supreme Court nominees, as long as they are smart and honest and decent, it really does not matter what they think. We do not have to know. I can't fathom -- can't fathom -- that that was the intent of the Founders. They intended the American people to know what their nominees thought.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.00148
VADER
0.957
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0045650184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034855355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002457512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022955204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0022886808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005543032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001988308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001777603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000163223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.12499E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5466E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.066
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
94
Magnitude:
0.062
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Joe Biden
And I might add -- and I will end with this -- we just had two Supreme Court Justices before our caucus just as they were before, I think, the Republican Caucus. They ventured opinions on everything. On everything, things that are going to come before the Court. It did not in any way jeopardize their judicial independence.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0224879885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.019038828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0090752445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0044470569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000744593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003588396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001205222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.58124E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
2.36188E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.9163E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.9333E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.144
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Joe Biden
So, Judge, I really hope that this does not turn out to be a minuet. I hope it turns out to be a conversation. I believe we -- you and I and this Committee -- owe it to the American people in this one democratic moment to have a conversation about the issues that will affect their lives profoundly. They are entitled to know what you think.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.816
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1105255447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0819511071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0372614973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0185236335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0171339547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0112699752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006600912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.88808E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.584E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.42388E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.01279E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.155
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Joe Biden
And I remind my colleagues, many of whom are on this Committee, they sure wanted to know what Harriet Miers thought about everything. They sure wanted to know in great detail. They were about ready to administer blood tests. The good news is no blood test here. The good news is no blood test, just a conversation, and I hope you will engage in it with us because I am anxious to get a sense of how you are going to approach these big issues.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.942
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.104574149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0089273533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0016148848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009659097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007298001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005896654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002829921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001201906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.0966E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.77408E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.326E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Health > Health Treatment > Medical Procedure/test
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.381
Code:
7003004
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/07003004
Wikidata_id:
Q796194
Wikidata_label:
medical procedure
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
6.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Joe Biden
I thank you very much, Judge.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1546639018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0735022069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0069475114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0030963416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022188764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015584239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013983386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003060428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002222592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.74962E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.05989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Biden.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0193653977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.014556454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0138795644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0110508699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021866987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001043133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.06532E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.78556E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.43756E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.37525E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.845E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Kyl?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0557710533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0375938223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038748949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0035533099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007289702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002568268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.7068E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.59615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.2657E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.369E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.96E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Jon Kyl
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0472305983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0296930462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0098944845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0083445499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041608961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015748192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006825043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000454705
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003602231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001617784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.6551E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Jon Kyl
Welcome, Judge Alito, to your confirmation hearing. At the outset, I am pleased to note that you have more judicial experience than any Supreme Court nominee in more than 70 years. Indeed, only one Supreme Court Justice in history, one Horace Lurton, nominated by President Taft, had more Federal appeals court experience. Moreover, you have devoted virtually your entire professional life to public service, and the Nation owes you gratitude for that service. I look forward to a dignified hearing followed by a fair up or down vote on the Senate floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.98
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0106964944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050827752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0037099038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022876051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003041962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001977005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001490247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001271481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.79999E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.81693E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.008E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.842
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37
Jon Kyl
Before discussing your nomination, I would like to take a moment to express my respect and admiration for the Justice whom you are nominated to replace, my fellow Arizonan Sandra Day O'Connor, whom I have known for more than 30 years. Justice O'Connor has served with great distinction during her career in the Arizona Legislature, on the Arizona Court of Appeals, and for what has been a quarter of a century on the U.S. Supreme Court. Arizonans are deeply proud of Justice O'Connor's service to this country. She will always be remembered by Arizonans and all Americans as an extraordinary public servant.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.984
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0253771374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0025894729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002571989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011155195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005284833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000498174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002729431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001883295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.30343E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.6484E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.1039E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.259
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Jon Kyl
Judge Alito, I would like to discuss your background and experience in the context of other Justices on the Supreme Court so that everyone understands how well you satisfy what we have come to expect from our top judges. Like all the sitting Justices, you had an outstanding education. One of your classmates at Yale Law School, Tony Kronman, who later went on to be the dean of the law school and could, I believe, fairly be described as a political liberal, has recently remarked, and I quote, "He impressed me" -- speaking of you -- "as being more interested in the technical, intellectual challenges of the law and its legal reasoning than its political uses or ramifications." Thus, even in your early 20's, it appears you were focused on the law as an independent pursuit rather than using law to influence political ends.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.91667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.91667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.75154
VADER
0.984
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0246459502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00700807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035505425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032392905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012536606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004768808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001755227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.56979E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.56958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.60028E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.56666E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.799
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
48
Jon Kyl
With your intellect and education, you could have become a wealthy attorney, but instead you devoted virtually all of your legal career to the public service. In doing so, you meet, and even exceed, the stellar examples set by Justices Thomas and Souter, each of whom devoted most of their pre-judicial careers to public service. Perhaps this is because, like Justices Ginsburg and Scalia, you had a father who was an immigrant to this Nation. It seems that immigrants often have a special understanding of the incredible opportunities that this Nation affords its citizens. Moreover, your father's long service to the people of New Jersey both as a schoolteacher and as a civil servant in the State legislature plainly served as a model for you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.64663
VADER
0.967
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0118678938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.007229294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0055094526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040794592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019226067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010609626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006142552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004130358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003703963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.26463E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.133E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Financial and Business Service > Legal Service
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.121
Code:
4006007
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/04006007
Wikidata_id:
Q1494322
Wikidata_label:
legal services
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Demographics > Immigration
Score:
95
Magnitude:
0.116
Code:
14003002
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14003002
Wikidata_id:
Q131288
Wikidata_label:
immigration
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Migration
Score:
93
Magnitude:
0.113
Code:
11017000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11017000
Wikidata_id:
Q15064326
Wikidata_label:
immigration policy
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
80
Magnitude:
0.097
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Tennis
Score:
71
Magnitude:
0.086
Code:
15065000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15065000
Wikidata_id:
Q847
Wikidata_label:
tennis
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.9
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41
Jon Kyl
I also note that you served in the U.S. Army Reserves from 1972 until 1980. If confirmed, only you and Justice Stevens would have any military experience. You would also be the first Supreme Court Justice to have served in the Army Reserves since Justice Frank Murphy did so during World War II.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.863
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0409165717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0361161656
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0184150835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0092354618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0074019823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0021048834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001235333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.84324E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.08115E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.2831E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.5654E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.466
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Defense
Score:
83
Magnitude:
0.385
Code:
11001000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11001000
Wikidata_id:
Q17991228
Wikidata_label:
national defence
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
55
Magnitude:
0.254
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.4
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
6.9
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Jon Kyl
You have spent much of your career as a Federal prosecutor pursuing terrorists, mob kingpins, drug dealers, and others who threaten our safety and our security. Justice Souter had a distinguished career as a State prosecutor, but no sitting Justice has served as a Federal prosecutor. Again, this experience could prove helpful given that approximately 40 percent of the Supreme Court docket involves criminal matters.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.813
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.27894089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0584664696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0380382116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0309753203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0103086197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0038919123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002337688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001013624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.63724E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.38433E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.09269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.224
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
72
Magnitude:
0.161
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Jon Kyl
You also served as an attorney in the executive branch. Like Chief Justice Roberts, you served in the Solicitor General's office representing our Government before the Supreme Court. And like Justice Scalia, you served in the Office of Legal Counsel, providing constitutional advice to the President and the rest of the executive branch. In both of these roles, your job was to advance the policies of a President who twice won an electoral college landslide. He set the agenda, and you helped him implement it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.64663
VADER
0.962
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0967016269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0317483355
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0176721034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0089253961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0067885187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000896808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003729323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001360033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.0001E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.7728E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9846E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.223
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
86
Magnitude:
0.192
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General)
Score:
61
Magnitude:
0.135
Code:
11024000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024000
Wikidata_id:
Q11827330
Wikidata_label:
political process
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Jon Kyl
Similarly, Justice Thomas served Presidents Reagan and Bush in political/legal capacities, and Justice Breyer also worked in political jobs, both in President Johnson's Justice Department and as a lawyer to this Committee.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.881
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0307178503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049941096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020312465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009294577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006411629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
8.25621E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.19782E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.012E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4943E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.4811E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3672E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.512
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General)
Score:
59
Magnitude:
0.303
Code:
11024000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024000
Wikidata_id:
Q11827330
Wikidata_label:
political process
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
14.4
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Jon Kyl
I note that you were just 39 when nominated to serve on the Third Circuit. Justice Kennedy was only 38 when nominated to the Ninth Circuit, and Justice Breyer only 42 when nominated to the First Circuit. Like them, you now have a great deal of hands-on experience that you can bring to the Court for years to come.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.925
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2955376869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0867132389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0751838495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0155891801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048311264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005040554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003571271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.70483E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.39206E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.97449E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.47729E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Sport > Motor Racing
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.153
Code:
15039000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15039000
Wikidata_id:
Q5386
Wikidata_label:
auto racing
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Motor Racing > Formula One
Score:
91
Magnitude:
0.139
Code:
15039001
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15039001
Wikidata_id:
Q1968
Wikidata_label:
Formula One
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
84
Magnitude:
0.129
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Jon Kyl
During your judicial service, you amassed an impressive record for the Senate to review, including more than 350 authored opinions. It is this judicial record that should be the focus of this Committee, just as it was with all of the other sitting Justices on the Court. It appears to me that you easily fit into the mold of what this Nation has come to expect from a Supreme Court Justice: a first-rate intellect, demonstrated academic excellence, a life of engagement with serious constitutional analysis, and a reputation for fair- mindedness and modesty. These are the standards for a Supreme Court Justice, and you plainly meet these expectations. As a consequence, I view your nomination with a heavy presumption in favor of confirmation. Before I conclude, I would like, though, to address two other points.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.68421
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.5506
VADER
0.99
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.8556486107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095472431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0073855321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065766922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0044992092
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009179979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003951953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002174641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001994153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.13114E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.6258E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.881
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45
Jon Kyl
First, some of my colleagues are fond of asking the question, Which side are you on? You have heard that today. Politicians must pick sides regularly, every time they vote, so it is perhaps natural that they see the world as a battle between competing groups. But it is wholly inappropriate as an approach to the judicial role. The only relevant side is that of the law and the Constitution. We do great injury to the integrity of the court system when we start speaking of sides and stop devoting ourselves to the pursuit of impartial justice.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.9
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0820273999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0198363618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0126476632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028929833
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017213373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006499288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004420897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001222673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.50908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.04544E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.3262E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.335
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Jon Kyl
During Chief Justice Roberts's confirmation hearings, I was struck by the way he answered the question. Then Judge Roberts explained that he had been asked earlier in the confirmation process, Are you going to be on the side of the little guy? Roberts explained that this question troubled him, and this is how he answered. He said, "If the Constitution says that the little guy should win, the little guy is going to win. But if the Constitution says that the big guy should win, well, then the big guy is going to win because my obligation is to the Constitution. That's the oath. The oath that a judge takes is not that I will look out for particular interests. The oath is to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the United States." And this is the essence of justice. Our courts provide a neutral forum for the adjudication of disputes under the law, not based on economic or political power, on race, on sex, or any other personal characteristics. Big guy, little guy -- it should make no difference. The rule of law demands neutrality.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.06667
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.06667
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.12516
VADER
0.973
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1132879173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0186850608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095529722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0038855927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003794425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005778882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004851099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.72151E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.52774E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6661E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.863
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
42
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
Jon Kyl
Second, I want to address the proper scope of questioning during these hearings, a matter that has also come up already. As I reminded Chief Justice Roberts at his hearings, the American Bar Association Model Code of Judicial Conduct dictates that, and I quote, "a judge or candidate for election or appointment to judicial office shall not, with respect to cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the court, make pledges, promises, or commitments that are inconsistent with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of the office." In other words, no judicial nominee should answer any question that is designed to reveal how the nominee will rule on any issue that could come before the Court. This rule has come to be known as "the Ginsburg standard" because Justice Ginsburg stated during her own confirmation hearings that she would give no forecasts, no hints about how she would rule on issues. And I was pleased to see that Chief Justice Roberts refused to prejudge issues or make promises in exchange for confirmation votes. We are all better off because of his principled stand.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.95551
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.54839
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.54839
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18377
VADER
0.923
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0606478192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0278622698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0145718004
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0105106039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018961422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010668961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000186446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.08259E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.64019E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.74935E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.6492E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
49
Sprache Difficult Word Count
51
Jon Kyl
Soon after his confirmation, Justice Ginsburg was asked about this Ginsburg standard as applied to the Roberts hearings, and she said, "Judge Roberts was unquestionably right. My rule was I will not answer a question that attempts to project how I will rule in a case that might come before the Court." In other words, Justice Ginsburg reaffirmed the Ginsburg standard.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0228928213
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025964906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011825081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0009578302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006328561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002430366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001332984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.10727E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.32286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.98998E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.2847E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.129
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.4
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Jon Kyl
In light of the Chief Justice's confirmation hearings and Justice Ginsburg's later remarks, I asked my colleagues for basic fair play. Apply the same standards to Judge Alito that we applied to John Roberts, Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and all of the other sitting Justices. Let's not invent a new standard for Judge Alito or change the rules in the middle of the game. Politicians must let voters know what they think about issues before the election. Judges should not.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0378780649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0203383359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0189486556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0056480745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013040551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004422081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.29747E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.05639E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.5434E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1467E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.227E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.473
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Jon Kyl
And it is not a hypothetical matter. Senator Kennedy in his opening statement expressed concern about the extent of the executive branch's authority to conduct surveillance of terrorists and said ultimately the courts will decide whether the President has gone too far. Indeed they will.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
-0.59
Very Negative
Moderation
Hate
0.0238562177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0063454201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030757761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015841928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003131868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003086111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003002104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.06747E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.50887E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.30435E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.861E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.304
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War > Act of Terror
Score:
71
Magnitude:
0.216
Code:
16001000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16001000
Wikidata_id:
Q2223653
Wikidata_label:
terrorist attack
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Trials
Score:
62
Magnitude:
0.19
Code:
2008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02008000
Wikidata_id:
Q8016240
Wikidata_label:
trial
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
59
Magnitude:
0.18
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Jon Kyl
Judge Alito, I will tell you the same thing I told John Roberts. I expect you to adhere to the Code of Judicial Conduct, and I want you to know that I will strongly defend your refusal to give any indication of how you might rule on any matter that might come before you as a judge or to answer any question that you believe to be improper under the circumstances. Congratulations, Judge Alito, on your nomination.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.751
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0391737878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0224373565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0066875065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0025137431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019912872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008536783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000725731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006482148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006273093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002437673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002039676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.865
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Kyl.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0201154879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0195142944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0169919527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0053920976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010127266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009702525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002860347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.71391E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.56522E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.13584E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.74757E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Kohl?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0166920596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0073773466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0063892046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0062159408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047974419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005661129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003141761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.71667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.33326E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.14051E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.12071E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.6
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Herb Kohl
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0084137042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065513661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0065023516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021945558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013660197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013067541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010696437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.87069E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.9001E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.4176E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.301E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Herb Kohl
Judge Alito, let me also send my welcome to you this afternoon and to your family. You are to be congratulated on your nomination.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0270817196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026009591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0025981901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020501708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011898225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005020036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001906095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.62091E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.34035E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.48781E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.2873E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.196
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Herb Kohl
Through its interpretation of the Constitution, the Supreme Court hugely shapes the fabric of our society for us and for future generations. Over the course of more than 200 years, it has found a right to equal education regardless of race. It has guaranteed an attorney and a fair trial to all Americans, rich and poor alike. It has allowed women to keep private medical decisions private. And it has allowed Americans to speak, vote, and worship without interference from their Government.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.823
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0251063233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00698043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035266105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032814325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012603989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004780492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001796849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.70822E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.65823E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.63155E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.57597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.216
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
66
Magnitude:
0.142
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
56
Magnitude:
0.122
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Trials
Score:
54
Magnitude:
0.116
Code:
2008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02008000
Wikidata_id:
Q8016240
Wikidata_label:
trial
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Education
Score:
51
Magnitude:
0.11
Code:
5000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/05000000
Wikidata_id:
Q8434
Wikidata_label:
education
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Herb Kohl
Through these decisions and many more, the judicial branch has in its finest hours stood firmly on the side of individuals against those who would trample their rights. In the words of Justice Black, "The courts stand against any winds that blow as havens of refuge for those who might otherwise suffer because they are helpless, weak, outnumbered, or because they are nonconforming victims of prejudice or public excitement."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.813
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0068997106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045597018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043379478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021135549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002481652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001121065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.24951E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.11632E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.69561E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.34037E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.14572E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.265
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
66
Magnitude:
0.176
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Herb Kohl
As the guardian of our rights, the Supreme Court makes decisions every year which either protect the individual or leave him at the mercy of more powerful forces in our society. They consider questions like when can a disabled individual sue to gain access to a courthouse, when can a parent leave work to care for a sick child, when should the Government be allowed to listen to a private conversation, and when will the courthouse doors open or close to an employee suffering discrimination at work.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.73089
VADER
0.92
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0062934858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0025707459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0021287504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017431963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017329347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001673406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000141028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.52594E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.25113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.0183E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8147E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Human Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.381
Code:
11007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11007000
Wikidata_id:
Q8458
Wikidata_label:
human rights
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Labor > Employment
Score:
66
Magnitude:
0.252
Code:
9003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/09003000
Wikidata_id:
Q656365
Wikidata_label:
employment
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Herb Kohl
Whether interpreting the Constitution or filling in the blanks of a law or a regulation, every word of the Court's opinion can widen or narrow our rights as Americans and either protect us or leave us more vulnerable to any winds that blow. If confirmed, you will write the words that will either broaden or narrow our rights for the rest of your working life. You will be interpreting the Constitution in which we as a people place our faith and on which our freedoms as a Nation rest. And on a daily basis, the words of your opinions will affect countless individuals as they seek protection behind the courthouse doors.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.641
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0207392295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0151439672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0044174401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011344431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010810588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.88835E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.2683E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.05865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.7615E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.405E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.86E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.344
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
76
Magnitude:
0.262
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
65
Magnitude:
0.225
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Herb Kohl
Despite your enormous power, you will be free of all constraints, unaccountable and unrecallable. We give Supreme Court Justices this freedom because we expect them to remain above the pull of politics, to avoid the effects of public excitement and allow a broader view, not tied to the whims of the majority at a certain moment in the history. So for only a short time this month will the people through their Senators be able to question and to judge you. In short, before we give you the keys to the car, we would like to know where you plan to take us.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.925
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0090650472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0056842178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021691254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014602849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009670764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006393476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001613959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.817E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.94773E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.8855E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.993E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.456
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60
Gunning-Fog Score
13
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Herb Kohl
To a certain extent, we know more about what is in your heart and in your mind than we did with now Justice Roberts. You have a long track record as a judge and as a public official in the Justice Department. When we met privately and I asked you what sort of Supreme Court Justice you would make, your answer was fair when you said, "If you want to know what sort of a Justice I would make, then look at what sort of a judge I have been."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.969
Very Positive
Moderation
Hate
0.0059109312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0059057194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0042049378
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007110781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005490672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001431525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.34333E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.2952E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.04E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0752E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.752E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Herb Kohl
Taking this advice, your critics argue that your judicial record demonstrates that you will not sufficiently protect the individual, but will instead side with more powerful interests, narrow the rights we enjoy, and leave individual Americans more vulnerable to abuse. For example, they cite your Casey dissent as diminishing the power of married women over their own bodies. They identify your decision in the Chittister case as evidence that you will make it harder for working people to care for a family. They cite the Bray case and others where you often side with corporations to block the victims of discrimination from getting their day in court. Others raise concerns about your views on the rights of the accused when faced with the Government's enormous power in the criminal justice process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.81818
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.81818
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.701
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0262637914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0204017488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0094213254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0056779067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026090329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022334849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001173931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.20551E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.84626E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.55646E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.80631E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.25
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
99
Magnitude:
0.247
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Prosecution
Score:
85
Magnitude:
0.213
Code:
2009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02009000
Wikidata_id:
Q6559173
Wikidata_label:
prosecution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Abusive Behavior
Score:
65
Magnitude:
0.163
Code:
14022000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14022000
Wikidata_id:
Q600571
Wikidata_label:
abuse
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45
Herb Kohl
In addition to your record on the bench, your opponents identify memos you wrote while in the Justice Department as further evidence of your hostility to individual rights. For example, in your now famous 1985 job application, you expressed pride in some of the work you did in the Solicitor General's office. You chose to single out the assistance that you provided in crafting Supreme Court briefs urging that "the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion." While these statements came in the context of your work on behalf of the Reagan administration, they were, nevertheless, your self- proclaimed personal views.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.663
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0071448987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0035601377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018134971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009642356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000825904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005814821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001517359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.96894E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.34486E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.07584E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.196E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.394
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
89
Magnitude:
0.35
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Basketball
Score:
60
Magnitude:
0.235
Code:
15008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15008000
Wikidata_id:
Q5372
Wikidata_label:
basketball
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
Herb Kohl
In the same job application, you wrote that you had pursued a legal career because you disagreed with many of the decisions of the Warren Court, especially, and I quote, "in the areas of criminal procedure, the Establishment Clause, and reapportionment." These Warren Court decisions establishing one person/one vote, Miranda rights, and protections for religious minorities are some of the most important cases protecting our rights and our liberties, protecting minorities against majority abuses and protecting individuals against Government abuses, and yet antagonism toward these decisions seems to have motivated your pursuit of the law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.44444
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.89794
VADER
-0.787
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0207643781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0182469739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0130080312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015149505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014868895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003322905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001461909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.42436E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.203E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.8758E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8878E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Issue > Minority Group
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.376
Code:
14010000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14010000
Wikidata_id:
Q769696
Wikidata_label:
national minority
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
94
Magnitude:
0.354
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
78
Magnitude:
0.292
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Abusive Behavior
Score:
59
Magnitude:
0.221
Code:
14022000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14022000
Wikidata_id:
Q600571
Wikidata_label:
abuse
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Herb Kohl
Your supporters, on the other hand, contend that it is not fair to select a few specific cases in light of a career as a judge spanning 15 years. Further, they dismiss some of your early memos in the Justice Department as old and not particularly relevant. They argue that you are well within the mainstream of judges, especially Republican-appointed judges.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.828
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0503914722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049788836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0049660233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047345402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005129133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003708519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.86275E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.35605E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.08915E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.01771E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.6379E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.28
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Herb Kohl
So it is our job to sort out the truth about your record, separate the rhetoric from the reality, and decide where you will lead the country. We will need to examine whether, as your critics contend, you will consistently side against the individual or whether, as your supporters contend, you are a mainstream conservative who will fairly decide all cases. I hope these hearings will add to our record in making this critical determination.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.1431
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0836983498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0545071962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0368689973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0281414395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0053419455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001321129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004998921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002293967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.87202E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.59162E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9668E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.069
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Human Interest > Award and Prize > Record
Score:
95
Magnitude:
0.066
Code:
8006001
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/08006001
Wikidata_id:
Q1241356
Wikidata_label:
record
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue
Score:
83
Magnitude:
0.057
Code:
14000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14000000
Wikidata_id:
Q8425
Wikidata_label:
society
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Herb Kohl
This would be an appropriate time to share my perspective on how we will judge the nominee. We have used the same test for each of the five previous Supreme Court nomination hearings: a test of judicial excellence. Judicial excellence, it seems to me, involves at least four elements:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.933
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.5816520192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0707785308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0331779273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0118662771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.010402003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012332174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004957673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002977728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001831689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.43607E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.03797E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Herb Kohl
First, a nominee must possess the competence, character, and temperament to serve on the bench.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0364292675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0060570255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057066383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016520122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012328413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001020578
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006061299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001968443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001029506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001022762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0331E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Herb Kohl
Second, judicial excellence means that a Supreme Court Justice must have a sense of the values from which the core of our political and economic system goes. In other words, we should not approve any nominee whose extreme judicial philosophy would undermine rights and liberties relied upon by all Americans.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.942
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0239335408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0107526088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00580011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025746642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006040548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003272574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.58586E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.46075E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.5902E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4578E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.241E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.415
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General) > Political Systems
Score:
75
Magnitude:
0.312
Code:
11024001
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024001
Wikidata_id:
Q28108
Wikidata_label:
political system
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
53
Magnitude:
0.221
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Herb Kohl
Third, judicial excellence requires an understanding that the law is more than an intellectual game and more than a mental exercise. He or she must recognize that real people with real problems are affected by the decisions rendered by the Court. Justice, after all, may be blind, but it should not be deaf.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.467
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0441984797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0179885756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034598899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021873182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010916074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002510045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001065923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.54468E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.46394E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.3835E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.23E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.42
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
55
Magnitude:
0.23
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Herb Kohl
And, finally, judicial excellence requires candor before confirmation. We are being asked to give the nominee enormous power, and so we want to know what is in your mind and in your heart.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.852
Very Positive
Moderation
Hate
0.0635136734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.039482885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0089061134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033795186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004301983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002655503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001690216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.76758E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.04863E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.42931E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.4999E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.076
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Herb Kohl
Judge Alito, we are convinced that your intellect and experience qualifies you for this position. I enjoyed meeting you a few weeks ago and appreciated our discussion. Your legal talents are undeniably impressive, and your opinions are thoughtful and well reasoned. We are now familiar with your abilities in your long tenure as a judge. And yet we do not know whether the concerns some have raised about your judicial philosophy are overstated or whether we need to have serious doubts about your nomination. I look forward to these hearings as an opportunity to learn more and measure whether you meet our test of judicial excellence.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.20067
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.53393
VADER
0.977
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0193465166
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004838554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039099396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004429886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003545396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002266444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000166645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.93938E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.00611E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.92258E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.31945E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.534
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
Herb Kohl
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0414823706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0077346907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047308302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.00131812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007074836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005839071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.47684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5393E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.3878E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.3189E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8546E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Kohl.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0501825591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020268561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020175801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017586703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011891452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005958002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003024992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002485467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001777847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001412762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8116E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator DeWine.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0032088767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030690837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0016860977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008974539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002126568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.0816E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.88516E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.72701E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.1945E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7162E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.465E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
STATEMENT OF HON. MIKE DEWINE, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE OF OHIO Senator DeWine. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.009025896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015449845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0008026134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001719842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.14463E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.57816E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.42722E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.2374E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.7108E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.0119E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.8877E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.056
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.6
Gunning-Fog Score
3.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Arlen Specter
Judge Alito, I want to welcome you and your family, appreciate you being here with us today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0268135191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.007505672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0073626157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040689571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018280583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002617087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002396283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.63757E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.21006E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.66894E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.9028E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.159
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Arlen Specter
The Constitution gives the Senate a solemn duty, a solemn duty when it comes to the nomination of any individual to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court. While the President is to nominate that individual, we in the Senate must provide our advice and consent. This function is not well defined. The Constitution does not set down a road map. It does not require hearings. In fact, it does not even require questioning on your understanding of the Constitution or the role of the Supreme Court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.03688
VADER
0.807
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0268186821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0192288542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0070491362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051831666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024099139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011253704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000207695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.93879E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.81844E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.93299E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.10304E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.338
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
94
Magnitude:
0.318
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
88
Magnitude:
0.298
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.5
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
9.3
Automated Readability Index
5.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Arlen Specter
To me, however, these things are certainly important. The reason is obvious. When it comes to the Supreme Court, the American people have only two times when they have any input into how our Constitution is interpreted and who will have the privilege to do so. First, we elect a President who has the power to nominate Justices to the Supreme Court. Second, the people, acting through their representatives in the Senate, have their say on whether the President's nominee should in fact be confirmed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.917
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0101093501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0051733103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041434971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016743346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012556551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008589152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006458577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004828091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000110289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.33639E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5961E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.195
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
54
Magnitude:
0.106
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > International Law
Score:
51
Magnitude:
0.099
Code:
2011000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02011000
Wikidata_id:
Q4394526
Wikidata_label:
international law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
50
Magnitude:
0.097
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Arlen Specter
Judge Alito, I want to use our time together today to make a point about democracy. When it comes to our Constitution, judges perform certainly an important role. But the people, acting through their elected representatives, should play an even more important role. After all, our Constitution was intended as a popular document. It was drafted and ratified by the people. It established democratic institutions. It entrusts the people with the power to make the tough decisions. In most cases, it prefers the will of the people to the unchecked rule of judges. If confirmed, Judge, you should always keep this in mind.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.871
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0064197171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0055311732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037943271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033764099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033284621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009932289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002141453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.43789E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.09443E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.15464E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.6335E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.444
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.6
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Arlen Specter
In my opinion, Chief Justice Roberts put it best during his recent confirmation hearings, when he said, and I quote, "The Framers were not the sort of people, having fought a revolution, having fought a revolution to get the right of self government, to sit down and say, well, let's take all the difficult issues before us, let's have the judges decide them. That would have been the farthest thing from their mind," end of quote.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.43508
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0609189679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0136261457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0078611687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005996805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040476672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017464126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000179547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000125546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001189169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.31696E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.10317E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.274
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
60
Magnitude:
0.164
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.4
Gunning-Fog Score
18.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Arlen Specter
Sometimes, Judge, however, I fear that the Supreme Court forgets this advice. In the last 15 years, in fact, the Court has struck down, in whole or in part, more than 35 acts of this Congress, and nearly 60 State and local laws. Without question, the Court does play a vital role in our constitutional system. Sometimes local, State, and Federal law so clearly run afoul of the Constitution, that the Court must step in and strike them down.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2114216099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0521597045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0328365975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0087787419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049442493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026316653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005543074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000412777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002596753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.27291E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.55226E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.4
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Arlen Specter
In most cases, the Court performs this admirably and with great restraint. In recent years, the Court has struck down some laws that, in my opinion, did not deserve such a fate. Take, for instance, the Americans with Disabilities Act; it passed this Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support. The law was supported by an extensive factual record, and it was based on our Government's longstanding constitutional power to fight discrimination wherever it exists. When the Court considered the ADA in the Garrett case, however, it ignored the Act's broad support, cast aside the legislative record, and struck down a portion of the law. The decision was a close one, 5-4. The majority relied on a highly controversial legal theory, and the case evoked a vigorous dissent.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.05882
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.05882
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.11123
VADER
0.56
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.9150428697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1861043274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0289189542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0074814619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030352126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027606025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018601102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008069143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007461703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007363901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.00777E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.228
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
73
Magnitude:
0.166
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
45
Sprache Difficult Word Count
51
Arlen Specter
This is precisely my problem with Garrett. In such a difficult case where the Constitution does not clearly support the majority's decision, the proper response is not to strike down the law. In such a case, the Court should defer to the will of the people. In other ways, Judge, the Court's recent decisions have made life more difficult for the democratic institutions that perform the day-to-day work of our Nation, recent cases involving affirmative action and the posting of the Ten Commandments on public property, which seem to me at least to prove the point. The Court has upheld one affirmative action program at the University of Michigan, but struck down another one, and has allowed the posting of the Ten Commandments outside of a public building, but banned it on the inside in another case.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.23639
VADER
-0.9
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0516006374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0494666165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039723051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005177631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004214992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002879438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001240597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.39532E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.2763E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5309E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.503E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.52
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37
Arlen Specter
To add to the confusion, some of the Court's decisions involve multiple concurrences and dissents, making it hard, even for lawyers and judges to figure out what the law is and why.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.8473
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0985654071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0573595054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0360668928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0185464858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0127398482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014018142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005117959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.02665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.93268E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.46653E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.6421E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.201
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Arlen Specter
Chief Justice Roberts mentioned this problem at his hearing. And in one of his final statements as Chief Justice, William Rehnquist noted that one of the Court's decisions had so many opinions within it that he -- and I quote -- "didn't know we had so many Justices on the Court."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.778
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0200450857
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0177675829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0140940727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.011994235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0092690585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.005289691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0035427231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.2423E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.61349E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.2576E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2324E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.208
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Arlen Specter
What has emerged in certain areas, therefore, is a patchwork, a patchwork that leaves local officials, State legislators, Members of Congress and the public guessing what the law permits and what it does not. In 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt reminded us that the Constitution is, and I quote, "a layman's document, not a lawyer's contract." But that very document does little to serve people when Supreme Court decisions are written so that even high-price lawyers cannot figure them out.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.691
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0441010052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0282934925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0282503926
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0119145312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026839885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020508316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004963601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.9041E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.75372E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.53509E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.09077E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.189
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Arlen Specter
I am not the first to raise these democratic concerns. Many have faulted the Court for its lack of clarity in certain cases and many have criticized its recent lack of deference to decisions made by State legislatures and Congress. In fact, some have even suggested that this recent trend has transformed our democracy from one founded on "we, the people," to one ruled by "we, the Court." To me, the criticism has some force. The Constitution empowers the people to resolve our days' most contentious issues. When judges forget this basic truth, they do a disservice to our democracy and to our Constitution. Judges are not Members of Congress. They are not State legislators, Governors, nor Presidents. Their job is not to pass laws, implement regulations, nor to make policy. To use the words of Justice Byron White, words that I quoted at our last Supreme Court hearing: the role of the judge is simply to decide cases; to decide cases, nothing more.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.63636
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.63636
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.335
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.094
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.3178927815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0163933131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0163715376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0096337943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020059919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002863882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.70835E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.00581E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.2464E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6314E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.71E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
45
Sprache Difficult Word Count
48
Arlen Specter
Judge, from what I have seen so far, you do not need much reminding on this score. Your decisions are usually brief and to the point. You write with clarity and common sense, and in most cases you defer to the decisionmaking of those closest to the problem at hand. I do not expect to agree with every case that you decide, but your modest approach to judging seems to bode well for our democracy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.418
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0065033564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0050848066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.004711713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036316269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034860441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008782998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003853139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9978E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.68596E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.3675E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3825E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.178
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Arlen Specter
Over the next several days the members of this Committee will question you to find out what kind of Justice you will be. This hearing is really our opportunity to try to answer that question. Our constitutional system is founded on democracy, a world of people, not the unchecked rule of judges. If confirmed, it will be your job to faithfully interpret our Constitution and to defend our democracy case by case. I wish you well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.891
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0499492453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0065692584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053779597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0027209993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002455542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0020584734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0012828979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010951974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007179069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001843828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4425E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.476
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
91
Magnitude:
0.435
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General) > Political Systems
Score:
74
Magnitude:
0.354
Code:
11024001
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024001
Wikidata_id:
Q28108
Wikidata_label:
political system
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Arlen Specter
Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0134190268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0074052579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036959205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0036506728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004739655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.09228E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.40013E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.06099E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.19368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.61217E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2392E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator DeWine.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0167045728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020220486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017034672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0010467617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006590804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004018117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001060155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.14058E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.39939E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.6565E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.9017E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Feinstein.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Hate
0.0130403831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0114972056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033625704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0031263269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012154561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006070231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001268096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.6827E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0334E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.95E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Dianne Feinstein
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0246459502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00700807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035505425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032392905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012536606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004768808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001755227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.56979E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.56958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.60028E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.56666E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Dianne Feinstein
Welcome, Judge Alito. I am one that believes your appointment to the Supreme Court is the pivotal appointment, and because you replace Sandra Day O'Connor and because she was the fifth vote on 148 cases, you well could be a very key and decisive vote. So during these hearings, I think it is fair for us to try to determine whether your legal reasoning is within the mainstream of American legal thought and whether you are going to follow the law regardless of your personal views about the law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.922
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0359563302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0355936209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0188105318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0173633191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0069892361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011540576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008836507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006351113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003118799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000237543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.8618E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.52
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
57
Magnitude:
0.298
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Dianne Feinstein
Since you have provided personal and legal opinions in the past, I very much hope that you will be straightforward with us, share your thinking, and share your legal reasoning.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.821
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0132154208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0043144402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002071573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013780718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00106446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000636396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.46152E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.42715E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.95358E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.45389E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.14789E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Arts, Culture and Entertainment > Culture (General)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.062
Code:
1022000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/01022000
Wikidata_id:
Q11042
Wikidata_label:
culture
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Science and Technology > Science (General)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.062
Code:
13009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/13009000
Wikidata_id:
Q34104
Wikidata_label:
science and technology
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics
Score:
93
Magnitude:
0.058
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Dianne Feinstein
I would like to use my time to discuss with you some of my concerns. I have very deep concern about the legacy of the Rehnquist Court and its efforts to restrict congressional authority to enact legislation by adopting a very narrow view of several provisions of the Constitution, including the Commerce Clause and the 14th Amendment. This trend, I believe, if continued, would restrict and could even prevent the Congress from addressing major environmental and social issues of the future.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.029532882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0035487181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016391768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013535473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002502437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001810239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.00218E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.83908E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.80918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.87765E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4272E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.098
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Laws
Score:
92
Magnitude:
0.09
Code:
2006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02006000
Wikidata_id:
Q7748
Wikidata_label:
law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
74
Magnitude:
0.073
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Environmental Issue > Nature
Score:
59
Magnitude:
0.058
Code:
6007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/06007000
Wikidata_id:
Q7860
Wikidata_label:
nature
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Dianne Feinstein
As I see it, certain of your decisions on the Third Circuit raise questions about whether you would continue to advance the Rehnquist Court's limited view of congressional authority, and I hope to clear that up.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.718
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0593960343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0144696038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0085773456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0059636139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027153743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014647062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003640538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.61086E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.70498E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.63544E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.31066E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Sport > Motor Racing > Formula One
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.068
Code:
15039001
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15039001
Wikidata_id:
Q1968
Wikidata_label:
Formula One
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Dianne Feinstein
Let me give you one example here, and that is the Rybar case. Your dissent argued that Congress lacked the authority to ban the possession and transfer of machine guns based essentially on a technicality. The congressional findings from previous statutes were not explicitly incorporated in the legislation. You took this position even though the Supreme Court had made clear in 1939, the Miller case, that Congress did have the authority to ban the possession and transfer of firearms, and even though Congress had passed three Federal statutes that extensively documented the impact that guns and gun violence have on interstate commerce. I am concerned that your Rybar opinion demonstrates a willingness to strike down laws with which you personally may disagree by employing a narrow reading of Congress's constitutional authority to enact legislation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.77778
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.77778
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.7346
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.27444
VADER
-0.878
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1477446291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0085318177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.007691171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0043113101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028251718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024289558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000241376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001320836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.2463E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.66292E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.0626E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War > Weaponry
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.707
Code:
16012000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16012000
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Defense > Firearms
Score:
65
Magnitude:
0.457
Code:
11001006
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11001006
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.5
Gunning-Fog Score
18.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
52
Sprache Difficult Word Count
47
Dianne Feinstein
The subject of Executive power has come up, and indeed it is a very big one. I think we are all concerned about how you approach and decide cases involving expanded Presidential powers. Recently there have been several actions taken by the administration that highlight why the constitutional checks and balances between the branches of Government are so essential. These include the use of torture, whether through an expansive reading of law, or disregarding Geneva Conventions, including the Convention on Torture, whether the President is bound by ratified treaties or not, allowing the detention of American citizens without providing due process -- of course, Sandra Day O'Connor was dispositive in the Hamdi case -- and whether the President can conduct electronic surveillance on Americans without a warrant despite legislation that establishes a court process for all electronic surveillance.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.23639
VADER
-0.74
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.121926365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0130166678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0108932742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0050067367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010624925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002464921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001502259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.4299E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8167E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.666E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.38E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.236
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Treaty
Score:
69
Magnitude:
0.162
Code:
11027000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11027000
Wikidata_id:
Q131569
Wikidata_label:
treaty
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > International Law
Score:
67
Magnitude:
0.159
Code:
2011000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02011000
Wikidata_id:
Q4394526
Wikidata_label:
international law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
61
Magnitude:
0.144
Code:
11006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11006000
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
51
Magnitude:
0.12
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
50
Sprache Difficult Word Count
51
Dianne Feinstein
I am also concerned with the impact you could have on women's rights, and specifically, a woman's right to choose. In the 33 years since Roe was decided, there have been 38 occasions on which Roe has been taken up by the Court. The Court has not only declined to overrule Roe, but it has also explicitly reaffirmed its central holding. In our private meeting, when we spoke about Roe and precedent, you stated that you could not think of a case that has been reviewed or challenged more than Roe. You also stated that you believe that the Constitution does provide a right of privacy and that you have a deep respect for precedent.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.55
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.027867849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0204377677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0112684596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0064193075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024787119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004597943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004251126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.94094E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.69143E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.9796E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.6586E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.091
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Basketball
Score:
84
Magnitude:
0.076
Code:
15008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15008000
Wikidata_id:
Q5372
Wikidata_label:
basketball
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
69
Magnitude:
0.063
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Dianne Feinstein
However, in 1985, you clearly stated that you believed Roe should be overturned and that the Constitution does not protect a woman's right to choose. So despite voting to sustain Roe on the Third Circuit, your opinions also raise questions about how you might rule if not bound by precedent, and of course, obviously, I would like to find that out.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.576
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0264252711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0162520853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0132254296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024065517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018184275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000140425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000100652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.67942E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.09945E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.4204E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.6501E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Dianne Feinstein
I am also concerned about the role the Court will play in protecting individual rights in this and the next century. Historically, the Court has been the forum to which individuals can turn when they believed their constitutional rights were violated. This has been especially noteworthy in the arena of civil rights, and as has been mentioned, in that same 1985 job application, you wrote that while in college you developed a deep interest in constitutional law, and then you said, motivated in part by disagreement with the Warren Court's decisions, particularly in the areas of criminal procedure, the Establishment Clause, and reapportionment. Now, of course, it was the Warren Court that brought us Brown v. Board of Education, and of course, reapportionment is the bedrock principle of "one man, one vote." So exactly what you mean by this I think is necessary to clear up.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.47368
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.47368
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.9694
VADER
0.178
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0128894244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0059910893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034972622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028420905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007812267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003892785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.93247E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.80717E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.3607E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.72E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.371E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.661
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
90
Magnitude:
0.596
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > International Law
Score:
58
Magnitude:
0.382
Code:
2011000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02011000
Wikidata_id:
Q4394526
Wikidata_label:
international law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41
Dianne Feinstein
Now, additionally, Justice O'Connor was a deciding vote on a critical affirmative action case involving the University of Michigan, Grutter v. Bollinger. So your views here may well be pivotal, so I think the American people deserve to know how you feel, how you think, how you would legally reason affirmative action legislation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2953010146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0194491673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0052005005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028642962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005533012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003526122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.06322E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.46216E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.26083E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.2386E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9702E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.12
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Dianne Feinstein
When you served in the Solicitor General's Office during the Reagan administration, you argued in three cases against the constitutionality of affirmative action programs, then once on the Third Circuit, you sided against the individual alleging discrimination in about three-quarters of the cases before you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
-0.361
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1487042988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0763316231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0239706744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0119348973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0057440921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0029264113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009402533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004519391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002380476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001093928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.21866E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Dianne Feinstein
We have a lot to learn about what your views are and your legal reasoning, and how you would apply that legal reasoning. I really look forward to the questions, and once again, because this appointment is so important, I hope you really will be straightforward with us, and thereby be really straightforward with the American people.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.881161727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1371540944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0794415071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0581783534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0363501866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054471599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009465204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001702633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001145257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.76038E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0939E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Human Interest > Curiosity
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.087
Code:
8002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/08002000
Wikidata_id:
Q361306
Wikidata_label:
human interest story
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Company Information > Board of Directors (Appointment and Change)
Score:
75
Magnitude:
0.065
Code:
4016008
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/04016008
Wikidata_id:
Q188628
Wikidata_label:
board of directors
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Arts, Culture and Entertainment > Culture (General)
Score:
67
Magnitude:
0.058
Code:
1022000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/01022000
Wikidata_id:
Q11042
Wikidata_label:
culture
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics
Score:
60
Magnitude:
0.053
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Dianne Feinstein
So thank you, and welcome.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.697
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0993184978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0862653775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.071162224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0277338899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0077499368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031313994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004999678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002552923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001894428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000160308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000101285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Feinstein.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3034685738
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1663975767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0093687187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0078017161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054316086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020960437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008708559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002816679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001758887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.07138E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.77073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Sessions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.023926195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034229295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027565247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012763581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010189121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004037569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001446454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.6593E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.5267E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.21749E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.5177E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
STATEMENT OF HON. JEFF SESSIONS, A U.S. SENATOR FROM THE STATE
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0092707734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0047624297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038535145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031564461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029639146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008050297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.10863E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.22429E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.03838E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4109E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.0744E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.9
Gunning-Fog Score
4.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Jeff Sessions
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0062748724
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020424544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0010991883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010191803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002483351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.34879E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.2881E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.29107E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.2871E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.289E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4579E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Jeff Sessions
I would like to also extend my congratulations to you, Judge Alito and your family. It is a very special day, a great honor to be nominated to the Supreme Court, the greatest court in the world, in my view, and this will be a good process. The Senate has an obligation to make a vigorous inquiry, and they will do so. I just hope and truly believe that by the end of these hearings your answers will be heard. The charges that I have heard made I know will be rebutted. People will listen and see the answers that you give, and when they do, they will feel great confidence in you as a member of the Supreme Court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.75786
VADER
0.991
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0269680138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0225891839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022971913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019127458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017862727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008885316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002094813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.77643E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.65716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0346E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.149E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.783
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
7.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Jeff Sessions
You have a record as a brilliant but modest jurist, one who follows the law, who exercises restraint and does not use the bench as an opportunity to promote any personal or political agenda. This is exactly what I believe the American people want in a Justice to the Supreme Court. It is exactly what President Bush promised to nominate. You represent philosophically that kind of judge who shows restraint, but at the same time you bring extraordinary qualifications and abilities.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.83333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.03688
VADER
0.978
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0914769247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0369911635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0152794571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0092418923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0060955292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002291577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.80914E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.91869E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.93967E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.4535E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.327E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.315
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Jeff Sessions
As has been said, judges are not politicians. They must decide discrete cases before them based on the law and the facts of that case. They are not policymakers. Every lawyer that has practiced in America knows that. That is what they want in a judge. That is what I understand they believe you are. That is why the ABA has given you their top rating, in my view.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9730046168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7046267167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4039890841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9433081374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9076331742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6565567572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.22452306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1437725849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1294429065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0909573573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0487053709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.544
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
8.6
Automated Readability Index
3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.3
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Jeff Sessions
This ideal of American law is the rule of law. It is the American ideal of justice, not to have an agenda, not to allow personal views to impact your decisionmaking, and I am real proud to see that your record indicates that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.919
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0523964467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0076719647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0052473231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024184023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001625788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015916388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003773802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000216818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001259961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0107E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.26806E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.452
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
70
Magnitude:
0.318
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Jeff Sessions
I like Judge Roberts's phrase of "modesty." I believe that is your philosophy also. We had the opportunity for a time to serve as United States Attorneys together. You were the top prosecutor in the office in New Jersey, one of the largest in the country. You had the whole State, much larger than my office. I know your reputation as one of ability, but modesty. In fact, I remember distinctly somebody told me, "Don't underestimate Sam Alito. He's a modest kind of guy, but he's probably the smartest guy in the Department of Justice." I think that is the reputation you had and one that you can be quite proud of.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.69231
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.52606
VADER
0.971
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4083077889
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.060592324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063788917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002467688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023502942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019612422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.27351E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.11003E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1769E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.8809E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7078E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.204
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Jeff Sessions
Your record of achievement is extraordinary. You were Phi Beta Kappa at Princeton and a Woodrow Wilson scholar. You attended Yale Law School. You were an editor of the law review, elected by your colleagues, and of course, for a graduating law student at a prestigious law school or any law school, being an editor of the law review is an extraordinary honor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.494
Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9781395569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7100218683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4066372067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9470939636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9110790677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6569254678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2249141689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.144392089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1300290925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0911959214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0490104663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.272
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
81
Magnitude:
0.221
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Jeff Sessions
You clerked for a Federal judge on the Third Circuit. You were an Assistant United States Attorney. You did appellate work, handling criminal cases, and as United States Attorney you were primarily a prosecutor. As I have checked the record, you will be the first person to serve on the Supreme Court since Tom Clark, who was appointed by Harry Truman in 1949, that had actual Federal prosecutorial experience, which I think is a great value. Matter of fact, I know it is a value. I have seen instances of Supreme Court rulings where errors have been made, mostly as a result of just not understanding the system and how it operates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.64706
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.64706
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.42139
VADER
0.943
Very Positive
Moderation
Hate
0.0632982177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0391858164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.016753911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0106958934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0042571686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0022960196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012243385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011850504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009421526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.27902E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.3419E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.49
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
35
Jeff Sessions
As an Assistant Solicitor General you argued 12 cases before the Supreme Court. That is an extraordinary number. Very, very few people in our country have had the opportunity to do that. Very few lawyers will ever in their career do one case much less 12.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9663765803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7037019134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4028377831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9445787407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9086475708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6548424717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2246582182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1439707703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1294602873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0910274219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0487309619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.402
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Jeff Sessions
So you did a great job, and I think that is why the ABA, the American Bar Association has rendered their views on you. It is a 15-member committee. All of them participate on a Supreme Court nominee. They take this very seriously. They interview judges with whom you work. They interview your colleagues. They interview people who litigated against you. They interview litigants who have lost before you as well as those who won before you, your co-counsel. And at the conclusion of all of that, they unanimously gave you their highest possible rating. I think that is an important thing. Some of us on our side of the aisle criticize the ABA. We say they tilt a little to the left, but their analysis process and the way they go about it provides valuable insight to this Committee and to the people of America, that the people of the country can know that they have interviewed a host of people who have dealt with you in every single area of your life, and they found you highly qualified, the best recommendation they can give, and that is something you should take great pride in.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.98
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0114868722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0104865772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0069193848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020915013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013997957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007968005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003072678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.52524E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.07139E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.2289E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.2074E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.132
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Labor > Employment
Score:
58
Magnitude:
0.076
Code:
9003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/09003000
Wikidata_id:
Q656365
Wikidata_label:
employment
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Trials
Score:
57
Magnitude:
0.075
Code:
2008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02008000
Wikidata_id:
Q8016240
Wikidata_label:
trial
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
46
Jeff Sessions
We do not want an activist judge. That is not what we want in this country. By "activist" I mean a judge who allows his personal views to overcome a commitment to faithfully following the law, following the law as it is, not as you would like it to be, good or bad, following that law. That is what we count on. When we violate that, we undermine law, we undermine respect for law, and endanger this magnificent heritage of law that we have been given. From what I understand your approach to law, you have it right, and your record indicates that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.64663
VADER
0.387
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0085228086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0053109503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039158498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034405988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.003297802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0014402035
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008722556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002258346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001758633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.49867E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.3766E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Crime
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2001000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02001000
Wikidata_id:
Q83267
Wikidata_label:
crime
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
98
Magnitude:
0.98
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
72
Magnitude:
0.721
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Jeff Sessions
The judicial oath you take is important. Some might say you have to follow precedent and precedent is a very big part of what you do, but you take the oath to swear that you will support and defend the Constitution of the United States. You will take that oath if confirmed, and you have already taken it as a Third Circuit Judge. It is an oath not to decide whether a decision is good policy or not. That is for the legislative branch. It is not an oath to defend the wall that the Supreme Court has enclosed sometimes around itself. It is not an oath to avoid admitting error in previous decision. But let me be more direct. The oath you take is not an oath to uphold precedent whether that precedent is super duper or not. If you love the Constitution, which I hope you do, and I intend to inquire about that, you will enforce the Constitution as it is, good and bad. That is your responsibility in our democracy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.36842
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.73089
VADER
0.956
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0118073585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0059685415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0058506728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0039517508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.002185996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005382825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002020581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001638873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000152962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.84962E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8663E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.217
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
84
Magnitude:
0.182
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
11.2
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
39
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
Jeff Sessions
We have already had this morning some matters that have been raised, and I think are worthy of just responding to briefly because allegations get made in these hearings, you may never get a chance by the time this hearing is over to rebut some of the things that have already been raised. Senator Kennedy claimed that you have not offered an opinion or a dissent siding with a claim of racial discrimination. I would point him to U.S. v. Kithcart. There you made it clear that the Constitution does not allow police officers to racially profile black drivers. A police officer received a report that two black males in a black sports car had committed three robberies. Later they pulled over a driver because he was a black man in a black sports car. You wrote that this violated the Fourth Amendment. You stated that the mere fact that Kithcart was black and the perpetrators had been described as two black males was plainly insufficient.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.70805
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.44444
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.44444
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.89794
VADER
0.63
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0378301629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0051198003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039164104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033089538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008846381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005295977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.49817E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.17437E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.1435E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.5645E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.6059E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Sport
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.211
Code:
15000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15000000
Wikidata_id:
Q349
Wikidata_label:
sport
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Motor Racing > Formula One
Score:
95
Magnitude:
0.201
Code:
15039001
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15039001
Wikidata_id:
Q1968
Wikidata_label:
Formula One
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Police
Score:
78
Magnitude:
0.165
Code:
2003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02003000
Wikidata_id:
Q35535
Wikidata_label:
police
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
66
Magnitude:
0.139
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War > Civil Unrest
Score:
56
Magnitude:
0.117
Code:
16003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16003000
Wikidata_id:
Q686984
Wikidata_label:
civil disorder
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Arts, Culture and Entertainment > Library and Museum
Score:
55
Magnitude:
0.117
Code:
1009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/01009000
Wikidata_id:
Q3152824
Wikidata_label:
cultural institution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Trials
Score:
53
Magnitude:
0.112
Code:
2008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02008000
Wikidata_id:
Q8016240
Wikidata_label:
trial
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Social Issues (General) > Discrimination
Score:
50
Magnitude:
0.106
Code:
14025003
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14025003
Wikidata_id:
Q169207
Wikidata_label:
discrimination
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
Jeff Sessions
They also may want to look at your majority opinion in Brinson v. Vaughn, where you rule that the Constitution does not allow prosecutors to exclude African-Americans from jurors, and you granted the petitioner's habeas petition in that case, reversing the conviction. You stated the Constitution guarantees, "that a State does not use peremptory challenges of jurors to remove any black jurors because of his race, thus a prosecutor's decision to refrain from discriminating against some African-American voters does not cure discrimination against others."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.16705
VADER
0.013
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0545798743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0167583697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0068441208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021888456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008431729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001924639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.19435E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.84969E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.71769E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.5094E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.831E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.168
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Social Issues (General) > Discrimination
Score:
70
Magnitude:
0.119
Code:
14025003
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14025003
Wikidata_id:
Q169207
Wikidata_label:
discrimination
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.3
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Jeff Sessions
As for dissents, you were the lone dissenter calling for an expansive interpretation of civil rights laws. Your dissent complained in an employer case that the majority had substituted its own opinion for the law, and you dissented, and later the Supreme Court vindicated you, 9-0.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.45455
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.45455
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.8873
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0189047656
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0121962388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0093374656
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036762878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030678752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020115935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009378228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004244021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001046518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.0707E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.53671E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.128
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
83
Magnitude:
0.106
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War > Civil Unrest
Score:
69
Magnitude:
0.088
Code:
16003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16003000
Wikidata_id:
Q686984
Wikidata_label:
civil disorder
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Jeff Sessions
I would also note you were questioned about judicial independence. I think some of our people have mentioned that, but an academic study of Federal Appeals Court opinions rated you the fourth most independent judge in the Federal judiciary. That is out of 98. They took that based on issues such as whether or not you are most likely to disagree with judges or agree with judges of a different political party.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.414
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0166210171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0053765394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024026969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017958411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0007151197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006159522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001290426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.86371E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.37128E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.2667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9814E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Jeff Sessions
Mr. Chairman, I thank you for your leadership, and look forward to a vigorous hearing. I am confident this nominee has the skills and graces to make an outstanding Supreme Court Justice.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.96
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.002111812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001891582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003891642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002721314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
1.19495E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
1.08846E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.7609E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.5746E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.1E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.8E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.0E-10
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.096
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Trials
Score:
80
Magnitude:
0.076
Code:
2008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02008000
Wikidata_id:
Q8016240
Wikidata_label:
trial
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
72
Magnitude:
0.069
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > International Law
Score:
59
Magnitude:
0.057
Code:
2011000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02011000
Wikidata_id:
Q4394526
Wikidata_label:
international law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Sessions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0537434942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0107198372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0083142309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0075432486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0008933663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004419274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003173764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.55275E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.42219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7585E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.619E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.6
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
We are going to turn to one more Senator, Senator Feingold, for an opening statement, and then we are going to take a 15- minute break. We will have concluded the opening statements of 12 of our 18 Judiciary Committee members. That will leave us four more. Then Senator Lautenberg and Governor Whitman to make the formal presentation of Judge Alito, and then Judge Alito's opening statement. At this time we will adjourn and we will reconvene at 2:10.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
-0.052
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0122235535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0099503086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0056311987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0049269096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016864127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013346601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002299787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001195912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.15653E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.16489E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.8427E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.686
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Arlen Specter
Pardon me. We are going to proceed with you, Senator Feingold.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0158344847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0052884148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033313867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026824864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008401196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004132675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001193697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.35343E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.93211E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.53618E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.3284E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.056
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.2
Gunning-Fog Score
2.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Note
[Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1177543541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0571192359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0128510728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019597164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017571345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001880322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001253706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001207377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.2861E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.32985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.83382E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Russ Feingold
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, I think.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0100744648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00401576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032620072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024259603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002189171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014764783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006471259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.18079E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.91254E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.8423E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1789E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Patrick Leahy
This is called the potted plant routine, Russ.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0144269216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0104207276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0036697591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001613498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011330203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000776017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001051688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.97979E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.1968E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3428E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1986E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
93
Gunning-Fog Score
3.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.3
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Note
[Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0192587817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0143066165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0120664248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0057062185
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0048903883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026355403
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010635589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002050612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001319433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.76113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.4662E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Arlen Specter
I am so anxious for the recess, I jumped the gun a little.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
-0.34
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9781401157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7100218683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4066372067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9470935911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9110790677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6569254678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2249141689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.144392089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1300290925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0911958807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0490104663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
4.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Note
[Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0072716146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0058336809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0042911743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035287161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007082749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001048589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.23393E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.77934E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.91311E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.56193E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.70827E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Russ Feingold
Mr. Chairman, I too want to welcome our nominee and thank him in advance for the long hours that he will put in this week.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.7
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1294397633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0329449074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0154137611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0084882806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.003099961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020700229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011318809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.68445E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.4844E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.95E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
92.6
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.6
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Russ Feingold
Judge, I do greatly admire your legal qualifications, and of course, your record of public service, and I wish you well here. And as with the hearing and the nomination of Chief Justice Roberts, I approach this proceeding with an open mind.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.907
Very Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9663765803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7037019134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4028377831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9445787407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9086475708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6548424717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2246582182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1439707703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1294602873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0910274219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0487309619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.361
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Russ Feingold
Judge Alito, I know that as a long-time student of the law in the Supreme Court, you appreciate the importance of the process that we begin today. A position on the Supreme Court is one of the highest honors and greatest responsibilities in our country. The Constitution requires the Senate to offer its advice and decide whether to grant its consent to your nomination, and the Senate has duly delegated to the Judiciary Committee the task of examining your record and hearing your testimony and responses to questions about your views.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.84615
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.12026
VADER
0.973
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0383037201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0070609298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030396097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023639815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006247427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000221646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001341078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.24534E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.83373E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.5969E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.634E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
1
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Russ Feingold
So it is our job in these hearings to try to get a sense for ourselves, for our colleagues who are not on the Committee, and for the American people, of whether you should be given the enormous responsibility of protecting our citizens' constitutional freedoms on the Supreme Court. So you will, obviously, face tough questions here, Judge.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.649
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0254150073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0230381265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0207843259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0081540624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016118616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007386401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000618901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000475791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004082892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000106073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.59449E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.289
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Russ Feingold
No one is entitled to a seat on the Supreme Court simply because he has been nominated by the President. I think the burden is actually on the nominee to demonstrate that he should be confirmed.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Self-Harm > Intent
2.9781401157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7100218683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.4066372067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.9470935911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.9110790677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.6569254678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2249141689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.144392089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1300290925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0911958807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0490104663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Russ Feingold
We begin these hearings today at an important time. Less than a month ago we learned that this administration has for years been spying on American citizens without a court order and without following the laws passed by Congress. Americans are understandably asking each other whether our Government believes it is subject to the rule of law. Now more than ever we need a strong and independent judicial branch. We need judges who will stand up and tell the executive branch it is wrong when it ignores or distorts the laws passed by Congress. We need judges who see themselves as custodians of the rights and freedoms that the Constitution guarantees even when the President of the United States is telling the country that he should be able to decide unilaterally, unilaterally, how far these freedoms go.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.21131
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0926937559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0151521715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0133606023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0031817628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0017355362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014523216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001889421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.93864E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.53426E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.16182E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.8358E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.817
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
66
Magnitude:
0.54
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
52
Magnitude:
0.424
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Russ Feingold
To win my support, Judge Alito will have to show that he is up to the challenge. His instincts sometimes seem to be to defer to the executive branch to minimize the ability of the courts to question the Executive in national security cases, to grant prosecutors whatever powers they seek, and to deny relief to those accused of crimes who assert that their constitutional rights were violated. So it will be up to Judge Alito to satisfy the Senate that he can be fair and objective in these kind of cases.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.22378
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.15789
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.15789
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.30228
VADER
0.904
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.0222936049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1816147589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1393110259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0291444798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0111225585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0064163323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007884764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003158232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.58023E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.9396E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.8766E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.774
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Russ Feingold
We need judges on the bench who will ensure that the judicial branch of Government is the independent check on Executive power that the Constitution requires and that the American people expect.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.019811184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0169311112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0094008363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036906618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025612242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0024593712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0022039789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0010997713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009998473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005957894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.0555E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.613
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Government > Executive (Government)
Score:
56
Magnitude:
0.34
Code:
11006005
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11006005
Wikidata_id:
Q35798
Wikidata_label:
executive branch
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Russ Feingold
In these days of corruption investigations and indictments in Washington, we also need judges who are beyond ethical reproach. In 1990, when the judge appeared before this Committee in connection with this nomination to the Court of Appeals, Judge Alito promised to recuse himself from cases involving a mutual fund company with which he had substantial investments, Vanguard. He kept those investments throughout his service on the Court of Appeals and still has them today. But in 2002 he sat on a panel in a case involving Vanguard. Since his nomination to the Supreme Court, we have now heard different explanations from the nominee and his supporters about why he failed to recuse himself. Needless to say, the shifting explanations and justifications are somewhat troubling. I hope that we will get the full and final story in these hearings.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.12
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.12
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.2318
VADER
0.848
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0416465307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0245443895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0071719856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019723573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011916053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008555537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001447205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.12222E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.10538E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.21753E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.98796E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.829
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38
Russ Feingold
Before we grant lifetime tenure to Federal judges, and particularly Justices of the Supreme Court, we must make sure that they have the highest ethical standards. The stakes for this nomination could hardly be higher. Justice O'Connor, as many have said, was the swing vote in many important decisions in the past decade. Her successor could well be the deciding vote in a number of cases that have already been argued this term, that may have to be reargued after a new Justice is confirmed. The outcome of these cases could shape our society for generations to come.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.963
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0793157553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0204344353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.017659791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0021595997
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001276374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011174009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005777323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004875904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
5.6534E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.81754E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.35953E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.314
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
94
Magnitude:
0.297
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Russ Feingold
Now, we do not have the right to know how a nominee would rule on those cases. Indeed, we should all hope that the nominee does not know either, but we do have a right to know what and how a nominee thinks about the important legal issues that have come to the Court in recent years. Commenting on past Supreme Court decisions, in my view, would no more disqualify a nominee from hearing a future case on a similar topic than would a current Justice participating in those past decisions. Mr. Chairman, it simply cannot be that the only person in America who cannot express an opinion on a case where Justice O'Connor cast the deciding vote, is the person who has been nominated to replace her on the Court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.953
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1186898793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019135796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015825259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006414485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000216939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.54882E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.53921E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
3.29232E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.49103E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.70951E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1266E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.374
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
92
Magnitude:
0.344
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > International Law
Score:
52
Magnitude:
0.196
Code:
2011000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02011000
Wikidata_id:
Q4394526
Wikidata_label:
international law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Russ Feingold
So I look forward to questioning you, Judge Alito, about Executive power, the death penalty, employment discrimination, criminal procedure and other important topics, and I look forward to your candid answers. I will have to say that I was rather pleased that the judge was actually less guarded in our private meeting, than were the other two Supreme Court nominees who I had had the privilege to meet. I hope he is even more forthcoming in this hearing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.64663
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0399598619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0080401049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0052190964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0042971657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00239367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019749375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003293834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8816E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.43863E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3226E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.677E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.652
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Punishment
Score:
56
Magnitude:
0.366
Code:
2004000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02004000
Wikidata_id:
Q186361
Wikidata_label:
punishment
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.8
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Russ Feingold
Given his long judicial record and the memos we have seen that express his personal views on legal issues, I expect complete answers, and I think my colleagues do too. If a nominee expresses a personal view on a legal issue in a memo written over a decade ago, I think we and the American people have the right to know if he still holds that view today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.421814248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.022225143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0019483141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003680049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003630819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.37114E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.66785E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
2.32414E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.982E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.153E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0889E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.212
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
52
Magnitude:
0.11
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Russ Feingold
Mr. Chairman, if confirmed to the Supreme Court, Judge Alito is likely to have a profound impact on the lives of Americans for decades to come. That is a fact. It is clear, Mr. Chairman, from how you have planned these hearings, that you recognize that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1693920814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0765032717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0381609541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0030671028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010131401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006661229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003296081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002047698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000166584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.27921E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.04991E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.261
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.5
Gunning-Fog Score
4.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
7.7
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Russ Feingold
Thank you for your efforts to ensure a full and fair evaluation of this nominee, and I not only look forward to the questioning, but I want to note that I have caused the recess to occur 3 minutes and 40 seconds earlier than it normally would have.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.535
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.5380061921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0360913138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0265644572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049732174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0024591251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013790657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006339893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004558634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002214873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.55974E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.82151E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Note
[Laughter.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0427076389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0114037095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0069403271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0048140915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017367547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001436452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.17031E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.66177E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.77148E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.7714E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.5356E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Feingold, for your brevity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0601388398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0112187125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0066936758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0056811183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0043787208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006164723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003396787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002256607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.69168E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4664E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5965E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.09
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Arlen Specter
We will now take a 15-minute recess until 2:15.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Self-Harm
1.0855204426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.5059733987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0655349868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0440146192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0138509815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0097802469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0040223636
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0020438749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008426737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005780348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.02693E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
4.4
Coleman-Liau Index
0.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Note
[Recess from 2 p.m. to 2:15 p.m.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
1.4497357421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.4445197992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0232946317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0227495169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0181501848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0130086133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011075705
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001049612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.87418E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.64338E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.287E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Arlen Specter
It is 2:15. We will resume these hearings. Next up on opening statement is Senator Graham.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0387330801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0213126594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.006469318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.004056513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036091231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006465343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.21728E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.21469E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.96072E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.4702E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.484E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.065
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Arts, Culture and Entertainment > Mass Media > News Media
Score:
91
Magnitude:
0.059
Code:
1026002
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/01026002
Wikidata_id:
Q1193236
Wikidata_label:
news media
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Human Interest > Society > Ceremony
Score:
81
Magnitude:
0.052
Code:
8005001
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/08005001
Wikidata_id:
Q2627975
Wikidata_label:
ceremony
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.6
Gunning-Fog Score
4.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
0.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Lindsey Graham
Shall I wait or go ahead, Mr. Chairman?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.3053493798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0183296477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0167662016
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0101122612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054015414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.002853837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022420209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009356484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000162744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.65904E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.37833E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
5.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Note
[Pause.]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
1.6872560605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.090229098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.035276718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0212484782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0158954033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001259491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001222881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.80682E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.86901E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0534E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.017E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Arlen Specter
Senator Graham, you may begin.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0501004746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0408576801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0190408246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0090968453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0049857583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003658584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002432172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.79466E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.01257E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.56458E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7285E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.5
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Lindsey Graham
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and welcome back, Judge. I would hate for you to miss my opening statement, a loss for the ages.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
-0.273
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0244091512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0162595563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0094705501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033130651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023253113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021551949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001244949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003094269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002428003
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001965433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001177045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.185
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
92.4
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
1.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Lindsey Graham
Welcome to the Committee. Welcome to one of the most important events in your life. You have got the people that mean the most here with you today, your family, and I know they are proud of you, and I am certainly proud of what you have been able to accomplish.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.955
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3563272534
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2066995017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0485784985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0228946767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031740561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018122177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0017667575
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001346659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007545743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001627282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4566E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Issue > Family
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.083
Code:
14006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14006000
Wikidata_id:
Q8436
Wikidata_label:
family
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Lindsey Graham
To say the least, you come to the Senate in interesting political times. There is going to be a lot of talk by the Senators of this Committee about concepts that are important to Americans, but what I worry the most about is your time, believe it or not, will come and go. You will not be here forever. It may seem that way, but I think you are going to be just fine.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
2.2959725931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1137863379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0078550838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0016206905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005213036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.76965E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.5463E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.72E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.364E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.458E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.599E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.313
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Lindsey Graham
I don't know what kind of vote you are going to get, but you will make it through. It is possible you could talk me out of voting for you, but I doubt it. So I won't even try to challenge you along those lines. I feel very comfortable with you being on the Supreme Court based on what I know, and the hearings will be helpful to all of us to find out some issues that are important to us.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.931
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
9.5807440579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
2.3435330018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.621634163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.2168235602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.1262592734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0736542221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0118882475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0068820074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0022517876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007544851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001291102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.275
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
54
Magnitude:
0.149
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election > Voting
Score:
51
Magnitude:
0.14
Code:
11003007
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003007
Wikidata_id:
Q189760
Wikidata_label:
voting
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
82.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.6
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Lindsey Graham
We had a talk recently about Executive power. That is very important to me. In time of war, I want the executive branch to have the tools to protect me, my family and my country. But also I believe even during a time of war, the rule of law applies.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
-0.591
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0517339271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0033944896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013586012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009404765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008437528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007604141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006304712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002820924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002671452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.41299E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.143E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government > Executive (Government)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.337
Code:
11006005
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11006005
Wikidata_id:
Q35798
Wikidata_label:
executive branch
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Defense > National Security
Score:
97
Magnitude:
0.328
Code:
11001002
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11001002
Wikidata_id:
Q258307
Wikidata_label:
national security
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War
Score:
95
Magnitude:
0.322
Code:
16000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16000000
Wikidata_id:
Q198
Wikidata_label:
war
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War > War
Score:
90
Magnitude:
0.304
Code:
16009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16009000
Wikidata_id:
Q198
Wikidata_label:
war
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
72
Magnitude:
0.243
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Family
Score:
61
Magnitude:
0.206
Code:
14006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14006000
Wikidata_id:
Q8436
Wikidata_label:
family
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
58
Magnitude:
0.196
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Lindsey Graham
I have got some problems with using a force resolution to the point that future Presidents may not be able to get a force resolution from Congress if you interpret it too broadly. And we will talk about those things and we will talk more about it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0491750718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.019698414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0179411771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0044195222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0038154376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036976726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002411411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001280801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.89725E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.5521E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.2246E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Defense
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.129
Code:
11001000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11001000
Wikidata_id:
Q17991228
Wikidata_label:
national defence
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Lindsey Graham
I am going to talk a little bit about some of the points my colleagues have been making. Everybody knows you are a conservative. The question is are you a mainstream conservative. Well, the question I have for my colleagues is who would you ask to find out. Would you ask Senator Kennedy? Probably not. If you asked me who a mainstream liberal is, I would be your worst person to pick because I don't hang out over there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.1431
VADER
-0.459
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0360964914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0292957207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.010201949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007839455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004889604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000318402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001055026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.26515E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2563E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.17939E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.806E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.067
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Lindsey Graham
I suspect that most all of us, if not all of us, will vote for you, and I would argue that we represent from the center line to the right ditch in our party and if all of us vote for you, you have got to be pretty mainstream. So the answer to the question, are you a mainstream conservative, will soon be know.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0502426701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020263322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020143327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017415579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011888629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005955304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003046497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002463415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001769469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001406181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.801E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.306
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Lindsey Graham
If every Republican member of the Judiciary Committee votes for you and you are not mainstream, that means we are not mainstream. And it is a word that means what you want it to mean. Advise and consent means what? Whatever you want it to mean. Advise and consent means the process has got to work to the advantage of people I like, and with people I don't want on the Court, it is a different process. That is politics.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.779
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0048910599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0027901822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020498304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020177338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000119167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.29893E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.33868E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.47069E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.4369E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.6453E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2962E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.153
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
84
Magnitude:
0.128
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General)
Score:
63
Magnitude:
0.096
Code:
11024000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024000
Wikidata_id:
Q11827330
Wikidata_label:
political process
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77
Gunning-Fog Score
7.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Lindsey Graham
Every Senator will have to live within themselves as to what they would like to see happen for the judiciary. My main concern here is not about you. It is about us. What are we going to be doing as a body to the judiciary when it is all said and done?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.035237713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0006743838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005632281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002421659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002010969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.22118E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.25984E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.13036E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.791E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.221E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.892E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.217
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Lindsey Graham
Roe v. Wade and abortion. If I wanted to work for Ronald Reagan, one of the things I would tell the Reagan administration is I think Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided. They are likely to hire me because they were trying to prove to the Court that the Court took away from elected officials a very important right, protecting the unborn.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.265
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0246459502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.00700807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035505425
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032392905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012536606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004768808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001755227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
6.56979E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.56958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.60028E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.56666E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Issue > Abortion
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.096
Code:
14016000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14016000
Wikidata_id:
Q8452
Wikidata_label:
abortion
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Basketball
Score:
96
Magnitude:
0.092
Code:
15008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15008000
Wikidata_id:
Q5372
Wikidata_label:
basketball
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
87
Magnitude:
0.083
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Lindsey Graham
I was on a news program with Senator Feinstein this weekend, who is a terrific person. She made a very emotional, compelling argument that she can remember back-alley abortions and women committing suicide when abortion was illegal. I understand that is very seared in her memory banks and that is important to her.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.565
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.7435995154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1947117387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1436267863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.007232307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0045645618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029303379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012923322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005773604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003791228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000146609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001409413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Social Issue > Abortion
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.301
Code:
14016000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14016000
Wikidata_id:
Q8452
Wikidata_label:
abortion
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Lindsey Graham
Well, let me tell you there is another side to that story. There are millions of Americans, a bunch of them in South Carolina, who are heartsick that millions of unborn children have been sent to certain death because of what judges have done. It is a two-sided argument. It is an emotional event in our society.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0320262858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0217949273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024472847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018661816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001076404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.72004E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
6.84263E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.89059E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.13153E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.06399E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6683E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Arts, Culture and Entertainment > Literature
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.132
Code:
1010000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/01010000
Wikidata_id:
Q8242
Wikidata_label:
literature
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Lindsey Graham
They are talking about filibustering maybe if you don't give the right answer. Well, what could possibly be the right answer about Roe v. Wade? If you acknowledge it is a precedent of the Court, well, then you would be right. If you refuse to listen to someone who is trying to change the way it is applied or to overturn it and you will say here I will never listen to them, you might talk me out of voting for you. I don't think any American should lose the right to challenge any precedent that the Supreme Court has issued because the judge wanted to get on the Court.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
0.494
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1699087676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0591130345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0361752609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0125221151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.003538212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005439357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002609802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002199813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001499574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.99379E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.39244E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.344
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
63
Magnitude:
0.218
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Basketball
Score:
59
Magnitude:
0.202
Code:
15008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15008000
Wikidata_id:
Q5372
Wikidata_label:
basketball
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.4
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Lindsey Graham
And you may be a great fan of Roe v. Wade and you think it should be there forever. There may be a case where someone disagrees with that line of reasoning. What I want from the judge is the understanding that precedent matters, but the facts, the brief and the law is what you are going to base your decision on as to whether or not that precedent stands, not some bargain to get on the Court, because I can tell you if that ever becomes a reason to filibuster, there are plenty of people that I personally know, if it became fashionable to stand on the floor of the Senate to stop a nominee on the issue of abortion, who feel so deeply, so honestly held belief that an abortion is certain death for an unborn child that they would stand on their feet forever.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.17007
VADER
-0.625
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0144790858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0119095334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0079521124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025626267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024059138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005574484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002670028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.94513E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.3214E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.2418E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1009E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.186
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Abortion
Score:
85
Magnitude:
0.158
Code:
14016000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14016000
Wikidata_id:
Q8452
Wikidata_label:
abortion
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Lindsey Graham
And is that what we want? Is that where we are going as a Nation? Are we going to take one case and one issue and if we don't get the answer we like that represents our political view on that issue, are we going to bring the judiciary to their knees? Are we going to say as a body it doesn't matter how smart you are, how many cases you have decided, how many things you have done in your life as a lawyer, forget about it, it all comes down to this one issue?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.325
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2344659762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.045920565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0178433373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0141614437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0129995984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012262408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002679451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.48624E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.01894E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.49308E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3349E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.121
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General)
Score:
52
Magnitude:
0.063
Code:
11024000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024000
Wikidata_id:
Q11827330
Wikidata_label:
political process
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.7
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Lindsey Graham
If we do, if we go down that road, there will be no going back, and good men and women will be deterred from coming before this body to serve their Nation as a judge at the highest levels. What we are saying and what we are doing here is far more important than just whether or not Judge Alito gets through the process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.414
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0380708429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0262381131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0062882966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034779652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012825223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008944259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005441645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005164572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000437143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.6519E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.59982E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.452
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Lindsey Graham
What is the proper role of a Senator when it comes to advising and consenting? I would argue that if we start taking the one or two cases we cherish the most and make that a litmus test, we have let our country down and we have changed the historical standard.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.052
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.3101065988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0272325386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0185986384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0031081487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026675069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023928962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006878658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003362898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002111591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.9765E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.37624E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.103
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Human Interest > People > Celebrity
Score:
68
Magnitude:
0.07
Code:
8003002
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/08003002
Wikidata_id:
Q211236
Wikidata_label:
celebrity
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Sport > Soccer
Score:
68
Magnitude:
0.07
Code:
15054000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15054000
Wikidata_id:
Q2736
Wikidata_label:
association football
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics
Score:
63
Magnitude:
0.065
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Education > Teaching and Learning > Test/examination
Score:
61
Magnitude:
0.063
Code:
5010004
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/05010004
Wikidata_id:
Q27318
Wikidata_label:
test
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Lindsey Graham
Elections matter. Values debates occur all over this country. They occur in Presidential elections. It is no mystery as to what President Bush would do if he won. He would pick people like John Roberts and Sam Alito. That is what he said he would do. That is exactly what he has done. He has picked solid strict constructionists, conservatives, who have long, distinguished legal careers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
0.836
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1322629862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1229647081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0268631353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0170907981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0069594273
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0038685263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024914332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0010308931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005070959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005067492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002606566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.312
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election > Local Elections
Score:
71
Magnitude:
0.221
Code:
11003006
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003006
Wikidata_id:
Q15966540
Wikidata_label:
local election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General)
Score:
60
Magnitude:
0.189
Code:
11024000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024000
Wikidata_id:
Q11827330
Wikidata_label:
political process
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election > National Elections
Score:
51
Magnitude:
0.159
Code:
11003004
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003004
Wikidata_id:
Q1076105
Wikidata_label:
general election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.2
Gunning-Fog Score
6.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9.3
Automated Readability Index
5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Lindsey Graham
What did President Clinton do? He picked people left of the center who worked for Democrats. And it cannot surprise the people on the other side that the two people we picked worked for Ronald Reagan. We liked Ronald Reagan. President Clinton picked Ginsburg and Breyer. Justice Ginsburg was the general counsel for the ACLU. If I am going to base my decision based on who you represented as a lawyer, how in the world could I ever vote for somebody that represented the ACLU?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.738
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.7189053819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0615163706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0520076603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0142232617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0080567683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0066799919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0065744665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0054806525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035716828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004747372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.4127E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Politics (General)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.156
Code:
11024000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11024000
Wikidata_id:
Q11827330
Wikidata_label:
political process
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
99
Magnitude:
0.154
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
77
Magnitude:
0.12
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Lindsey Graham
If I am going to make my decision based on whether or not I agree with the Princeton faculty and administration policies on ROTC students and quotas and I am bound by that, I will get killed at home. What Princeton does with their admission policies and whether or not a ROTC unit should be on a campus is an OK thing to debate; at least I hope it is OK. I think most Americans are going to be with the group that you are associated with, not the policies of Princeton.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.427
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0389684283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0281212444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.007694502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0035460489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013961082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002248311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001711369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.35625E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.34158E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.24104E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3518E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Education > University
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.305
Code:
5007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/05007000
Wikidata_id:
Q3918
Wikidata_label:
university
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Lindsey Graham
The bottom line is you come here as an individual with a life well lived. Everybody who seems to have worked with you as a private lawyer, public lawyer and as a judge admires you, even though they may disagree with you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0191317624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0099642573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040459578
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033302909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006448385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002278172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001621346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001385306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.98986E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.92873E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.1785E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.612
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Lindsey Graham
My biggest concern, members of this Committee, is if we don't watch the way we treat people like Judge Alito, we are going to drive good men and women away from wanting to serve. There will be a Democratic President one day. I don't know when, but that is likely to happen, and there will be another Justice Ginsburg come over. If she came over in this atmosphere, she wouldn't get 96 votes. Judge Scalia wouldn't get 98 votes, and that is sad to me.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.36772
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.3246031469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0152228706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0075690376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0066733068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014436661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000111361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
5.67558E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.37052E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.13578E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.0963E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.645E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.313
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
9.5
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Lindsey Graham
I hope we will use this opportunity not only to treat you fairly, but not use a double standard. I hope we will understand that this is bigger than you, this is bigger than us, and the way we conduct ourselves and what we expect of you we had better be willing to expect when we are not in power.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.856
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0318289793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0203867166
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.019746121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008325292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000469814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003424653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002904483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001313487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.02306E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.81928E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.28282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Sport > Soccer
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.056
Code:
15054000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/15054000
Wikidata_id:
Q2736
Wikidata_label:
association football
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Lindsey Graham
Thank you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0257779699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0082031809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046566191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024627132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016088454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0014187196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.82412E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.76719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.02119E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5773E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.4099E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Graham.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1438666251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1070997911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0241659363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0222727031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0187527243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018469205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003069993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001545484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.11138E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.80662E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.59685E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Arlen Specter
Senator Schumer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.158233894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0652634539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0074640884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057511301
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020973974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005903513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000558877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000189321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001067919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.8657E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.6581E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Chuck Schumer
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.3825099673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0282910158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0155807109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034678906
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034252058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015654561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004478148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003345458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001240231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.87281E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.49052E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.1
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Chuck Schumer
Judge Alito, welcome to you, Mrs. Alito, your two children, the rest of your family. I join my colleagues in congratulating you on your nomination. If confirmed, you will be one of nine people who collectively hold power over everyone who lives in this country. You will define our freedom, you will affect our security, and you will shape our law. You will determine on some days where we pray and how we vote. You will define on other days when life begins and what our schools may teach, and you will decide from time to time who shall live and who shall die. These decisions are final and appeals impossible.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.81818
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.848
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
1.1255693622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0505405944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.019616881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0162483353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0146184204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0037437665
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033049328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0028434164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0012149092
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009517232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000152914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.24
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Family
Score:
50
Magnitude:
0.121
Code:
14006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14006000
Wikidata_id:
Q8436
Wikidata_label:
family
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Chuck Schumer
That is the awesome responsibility and power of a Supreme Court Justice, and it is therefore only appropriate that everyone who aspires to that office bear a heavy burden when they come before the Senate and the American people to prove that they are worthy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.902
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1837887452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0781106297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0176801768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0072185612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063132436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0047915943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016387034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0008263601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007148681
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005108855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9561E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Parliament
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.244
Code:
11009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11009000
Wikidata_id:
Q35749
Wikidata_label:
parliament
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
93
Magnitude:
0.226
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
84
Magnitude:
0.205
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > International Law
Score:
56
Magnitude:
0.137
Code:
2011000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02011000
Wikidata_id:
Q4394526
Wikidata_label:
international law
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
20.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Chuck Schumer
But while every Supreme Court nominee has a great burden, yours, Judge Alito, is triply high, first because you have been named to replace Sandra Day O'Connor, the pivotal swing vote on a divided Court; second, because you seem to have been picked to placate the extreme right wing after the hasty withdrawal of Harriet Miers; and finally, and most importantly, because your record of opinions and statements on a number of critical constitutional questions seems quite extreme.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.61904
VADER
0.755
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.3894654103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0469363324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0177669048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054687651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0053897431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013389218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002072486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001666381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001038022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.63095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.12051E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.413
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Chuck Schumer
So, first, as this Committee takes up your nomination, we can't forget recent history, because that history increases your burden and explains why the American people want us to examine every portion of your record with great care.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.715
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0532269885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0318071397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0208805242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0139133539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0132936679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0043506083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0014684881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010909631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009391474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004936692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.97139E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Arts, Culture and Entertainment > History
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.169
Code:
1028000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/01028000
Wikidata_id:
Q1066186
Wikidata_label:
study of history
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Chuck Schumer
Harriet Miers's nomination was blocked by a cadre of conservative critics who undermined her at every turn. She didn't get to explain her judicial philosophy, she didn't get to testify at the hearing, and she did not get the up-or-down vote on the Senate floor that her critics are now demanding that you receive. Why? For the simple reason that those critics couldn't be sure that her judicial philosophy squared with their extreme political agenda. They seem to be very sure of you. The same critics who called the President on the carpet for naming Harriet Miers have rolled out the red carpet for you, Judge Alito. We would be remiss if we didn't explore why.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.64663
VADER
-0.878
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0498684647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0482719945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0077005789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0045885874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.003821457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006375277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003837268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003210225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000318583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001228867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0421E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.277
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
11.6
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Chuck Schumer
And there is an additional significance to the Miers precedent which is this: everyone now seems to agree that nominees should explain their judicial philosophy and ideology. After so many of my friends across the aisle spoke so loudly about the obligation of nominees to testify candidly about their legal views and their judicial philosophy when the nominee was Harriet Miers, I hope we will not see a flip-flop now that the nominee is Sam Alito.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.878
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0180997522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0063222265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0039472878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027219026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0014364643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003748389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003061695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001434608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001241426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.106E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.099E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.125
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Chuck Schumer
The second reason your burden is higher, of course, is that you are filling the shoes of Sandra Day O'Connor. Those are big shoes to be sure, but hers are also special shoes. She was the first woman in the history of the Supreme Court, is the only sitting Justice with experience as a legislator, and has been the most frequent swing vote in a quarter century of service.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.929
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.0073549876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0055700253
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035967572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018387465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000663345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004095269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003353524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001066276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.02E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.1256E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.005E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.196
Code:
11003000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11003000
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
92
Magnitude:
0.18
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
54
Magnitude:
0.106
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Chuck Schumer
While Sandra Day O'Connor has been at the fulcrum of the Court, you appear poised to add weight to one side. That alone is not necessarily cause for alarm or surprise, but is certainly a reason for pause. Are you in Justice O'Connor's mold or, as the President has vowed, are you in the mold of Justices Scalia and Thomas?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.82
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0040273186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025419526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0008894659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005729008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001440812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.78979E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.68583E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.06696E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.6937E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8955E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3628E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.076
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.3
Gunning-Fog Score
9.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Chuck Schumer
Most importantly, though, your burden is high because of your record. Although I haven't made up my mind, I have serious concerns about that record. There are reasons to be troubled. You are the most prolific dissenter in the Third Circuit.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.563
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0106253639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0089719892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070872862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020718358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006856723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004530351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001612599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.07221E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.2865E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.9138E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.4267E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Chuck Schumer
This morning, President Bush said Judge Alito has the intellect and judicial temperament to be on the Court. But the President left out the most important qualification: a nominee's judicial philosophy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.62
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0237118787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0200986527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0142597375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011885229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001172713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.10412E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.06822E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.52018E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2445E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.517E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.533E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.548
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Chuck Schumer
Judge Alito, in case after case, you give the impression of applying careful legal reasoning, but too many times you happen to reach the most conservative result. Judge Alito, you give the impression of being a meticulous legal navigator, but in the end you always seem to chart a right-ward course.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.21888
VADER
0.643
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1231278642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0276969513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0232766921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.016955068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054451339
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0032577358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0024462206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012155687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0006931602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004822155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.11469E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.41
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Chuck Schumer
Some wrongly suggest that we are being results-oriented when we question the results you have reached. But the opposite is true. We are trying to make sure you are capable of being fair, no matter the identity of the party before you. Sometimes, you give the government a free pass, but refuse to give plaintiffs a fair shake. We need to know that Presidents and paupers will receive equal justice in your courtroom.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.885
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0731962209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0099681733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035975467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011162432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000406825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003052496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002599119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001054715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.61733E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.40962E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.5056E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.111
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
82
Magnitude:
0.091
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
77
Magnitude:
0.086
Code:
11006000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11006000
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Parties and Movements
Score:
72
Magnitude:
0.079
Code:
11010000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11010000
Wikidata_id:
Q7278
Wikidata_label:
political party
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics
Score:
54
Magnitude:
0.06
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
9.5
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Chuck Schumer
If the record showed that an umpire repeatedly called 95 percent of pitches strikes when one team's players were up and repeatedly called 95 percent of pitches balls when the other team's players were up, one would naturally ask whether the umpire was being impartial and fair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.052
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0296231767
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.024232571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0155567352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012772568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000497028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004479775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.76947E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.12023E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.00559E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.39967E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.30085E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Chuck Schumer
In many areas, we will expect clear and straightforward answers because you have a record on these issues; for example, Executive power, congressional power and personal autonomy, just to name a few. The President is not a king, free to take any action he chooses without limitation by law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.313
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0018930114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012312351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000239781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001836834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001233201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.65425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.6848E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.8254E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.815E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.329E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.157
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Government > Executive (Government)
Score:
60
Magnitude:
0.094
Code:
11006005
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11006005
Wikidata_id:
Q35798
Wikidata_label:
executive branch
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.4
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Chuck Schumer
The Court is not a legislature, free to substitute its own judgment for that of elected bodies, and the people are not subjects, powerless to control their own most intimate decisions. Will your judicial philosophy preserve these principles or will it erode them?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
-0.008
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0506864162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072529292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057131292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036654077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026594449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005240371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004394126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001283312
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.2093E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.30792E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5982E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.393
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Chuck Schumer
In each of these areas, there is cause for concern. In the area of Executive power, Judge Alito, you have embraced and endorsed the theory of the unitary Executive. Your deferential and absolutist view of separation of powers raises questions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1304070116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0044147873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041036583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028544961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005590423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004962659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.08423E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.6685E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.997E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.3062E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8465E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.139
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Chuck Schumer
Under this view, in times of war the President would, for instance, seem to have inherent authority to wiretap American citizens without a warrant, to ignore congressional Acts at will, or to take any other action he saw fit under his inherent powers. We need to know, when a President goes to far, will you be a check on his power or will you issue him a blank check to exercise whatever power alone he thinks appropriate. Right now, that is an open question, given your stated views.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.36772
VADER
-0.394
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Harassment
1.0003842413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0685020175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0356061966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0304737623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023169152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000889796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002377635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002287941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001735117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001049877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.29219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.115
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War > War
Score:
81
Magnitude:
0.093
Code:
16009000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16009000
Wikidata_id:
Q198
Wikidata_label:
war
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War
Score:
69
Magnitude:
0.08
Code:
16000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16000000
Wikidata_id:
Q198
Wikidata_label:
war
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Chuck Schumer
Similarly on the issue of federalism, you seem to have taken an extreme view, substituting your own judgment for that of a legislature. Certainly, one important case you wrote, in Rybar v. U.S., that Congress exceeded its power by prohibiting the possession of fully automatic machine guns. Do you still hold these cramped views of congressional power? Will you engage in judicial activism to find ways to strike down laws that the American people want their elected representatives to pass and that the Constitution authorizes?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
0.697
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
6.2230613083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.4083496518
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1016613445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0105252271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0056597317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0051604256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006462538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004949071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002433265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.19858E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.84113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Unrest, Conflicts and War > Weaponry
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.244
Code:
16012000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/16012000
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
94
Magnitude:
0.231
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Chuck Schumer
And, of course, you have made statements expressing your view that the, quote, "Constitution does not protect the right to an abortion," unquote. In fact, you said in 1985 that you personally believe very strongly this is true. You also spoke while in the Justice Department of, quote, "the opportunity to advance the goals of bringing about the eventual overruling of Roe v. Wade."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
10.2391213179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0982355559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0627538771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0133732698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0070415641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0044665991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0024499399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001048927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.61962E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.22233E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7276E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.11
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Abortion
Score:
82
Magnitude:
0.09
Code:
14016000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14016000
Wikidata_id:
Q8452
Wikidata_label:
abortion
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Justice and Rights
Score:
69
Magnitude:
0.076
Code:
2007000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02007000
Wikidata_id:
Q5167661
Wikidata_label:
justice
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Politics > Constitution
Score:
54
Magnitude:
0.059
Code:
11015000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/11015000
Wikidata_id:
Q7755
Wikidata_label:
constitution
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Chuck Schumer
It should not be surprising that these statements will bring a searching inquiry, as many of my colleagues have already suggested. So we will ask you, do you still personally believe very strongly that the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion? We will ask, do you view elevation to the Supreme Court, where you will no longer be bound by High Court precedent, as the long-sought opportunity to advance the goals of bringing about the eventual overruling of Roe v. Wade, as you stated in 1985?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.73
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.675176248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.2382178325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0712584821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0092042421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023501172
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023099326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000596895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003150417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001468892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.51326E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.00098E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.124
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Trials
Score:
61
Magnitude:
0.075
Code:
2008000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02008000
Wikidata_id:
Q8016240
Wikidata_label:
trial
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Social Issue > Abortion
Score:
55
Magnitude:
0.068
Code:
14016000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/14016000
Wikidata_id:
Q8452
Wikidata_label:
abortion
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.1
Gunning-Fog Score
14.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Chuck Schumer
Judge Alito, I sincerely hope you will answer our questions. Most of the familiar arguments for ducking direct questions no longer apply and certainly don't apply in your case. For example, the logic of the mantra repeated by John Roberts at his hearing that one could not speak on a subject because the issue was likely to come before him quickly vanishes when the nominee has a written record, as you do, on so many subjects.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.16705
VADER
0.542
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0084680607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027030092
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017366438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001728152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008658821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006132402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.30838E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.5623E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.612E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.2096E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1628E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.275
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Chuck Schumer
Even under the so-called Ginsburg precedent, which was endorsed by Judge Roberts, Republican Senators and the White House, you have an obligation to answer questions on topics that you have written about. On the issue of choice, for example, because you have already made blanket statements about your view of the Constitution and your support for overruling Roe, you have already given the suggestion of pre-judgment on a question that will likely come before the Court. So I respectfully submit you cannot use that as a basis for not answering.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.769
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0643130392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0151689688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0053114771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015361637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005515017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002494662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001046566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.56095E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8332E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.5554E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.98E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.362
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Chuck Schumer
So I hope, Judge Alito, that when we ask you about prior statements you have made about the law, some strong, some even strident, you will simply not answer, in effect, no comment. That will not dismiss prior expressions of decidedly legal opinions as merely personal beliefs, and that will enhance neither your credibility nor your reputation for careful legal reasoning.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.798
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2648757771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0223757233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.011611815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0070919647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0047365269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014374676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002538785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002053861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.91195E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.54734E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4227E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.272
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.8
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Chuck Schumer
I look forward, Judge, to a full and fair hearing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0472299027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0346686924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0075228265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046262769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023874734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0021361448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020419131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.48558E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.60653E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.41848E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.6879E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice)
Score:
100
Magnitude:
0.404
Code:
2002000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002000
Wikidata_id:
Q105985
Wikidata_label:
judiciary
Source:
IPTC Subject
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Judiciary (System of Justice) > Judge
Score:
56
Magnitude:
0.225
Code:
2002002
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/subjectcode/02002002
Wikidata_id:
Q16533
Wikidata_label:
judge
Source:
IPTC Subject
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
95.2
Gunning-Fog Score
4
Coleman-Liau Index
6.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Arlen Specter
Thank you, Senator Schumer.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0