Fact
ba
.
se
Senate Floor: NOMINATIONS
Topics
Entities
Moderation
3 Speakers
Topics
No topics found
Entities
No entities found
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Mike DeWine Mike DeWine said 62 sentences of a total of 73 sentences.
85%
Mike DeWine said 1066 words of a total of 1135 words.
94%
Joe Biden Joe Biden said 4 sentences of a total of 73 sentences.
6%
Joe Biden said 40 words of a total of 1135 words.
4%
The Presiding Officer The Presiding Officer said 4 sentences of a total of 73 sentences.
6%
The Presiding Officer said 18 words of a total of 1135 words.
2%
Full Transcript
Mike DeWine
Mr. President, I rise this afternoon to talk about comments that have been made, both on the floor and off the floor, with regard to the job that the distinguished Senator from Utah, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Mr. Hatch, has been doing in regard to judicial nominations. I rise today to commend my colleague for the outstanding work he has done in regard to these nominations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.785
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0033260596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014327061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0006032098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003556863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.9228E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.4496E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
7.9396E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.2113E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.648E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.362E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.54E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Mike DeWine
Make no mistake about it, this is tough work. No one who has not had the opportunity to watch this from a close point of view, to see it up close and personal, really has any idea what kind of effort Senator Hatch has made to make sure nominees who come to this floor have been examined very closely and very carefully. It is proper; it is correct that this be done. No one can do a better job at this than Senator Orrin Hatch. I have watched him, day after day, in his examination and his staff's examination and work on people who have been nominated to the judicial bench. I must say he does a tremendous job.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
-0.374
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0089502573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0039964099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030377287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016391894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001496697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001141139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.25292E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.18444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.1357E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.2325E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7013E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
62.579
Magnitude:
119
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Mike DeWine
Senate consideration of judicial nominations is always difficult. It is always contentious. That is just the nature of the business. Yet in this Congress, under the guidance of Chairman Hatch, the Senate has confirmed 69 Federal judicial nominations -- 69, for those who offer criticism. Mr. President, 35 of these nominees have been confirmed earlier this year, and we have just confirmed 4 more. Yet not only has the chairman been criticized for nominees who are still pending in the Judiciary Committee, he has even been criticized for nominees who have already been confirmed; that is, nominees who are now serving, today, this very day, as Federal judges. Chairman Hatch has been criticized for not moving those nominees fast enough. I strongly disagree. I believe the chairman has done an outstanding job, a fine job. I wanted to come to the floor this afternoon to say that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.70805
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.06667
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.06667
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.12516
VADER
-0.832
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0466333062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0163240082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0099024321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032802964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016833292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.19416E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.33663E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.73441E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8131E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.8475E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.529E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
52.775
Magnitude:
143
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
29.765
Magnitude:
143
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.9
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
43
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Mike DeWine
I would like to talk about the confirmation process for a moment because, again, I think many times people really don't understand what this process entails -- or at least what it entails when the chairman is doing a good job. I think an explanation of the process may help those who are listening to the debate today understand why some of the delays in confirmation of judicial nominees occur.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0006978729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005283381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005270679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004446817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.000333098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.46489E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.74891E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.8747E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.47E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.16E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.02E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
31.105
Magnitude:
70
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Mike DeWine
The President has very broad discretion, as we know, to nominate whomever he chooses for Federal judicial vacancies. The Senate, in its role, has a constitutional duty to offer its "advice and consent" on judicial nominations. Each Senator, of course, has his or her own criteria for offering this advice and this consent on these lifetime appointments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.94444
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0074256735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025363954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023674264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013036548
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009446564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001218269
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.42312E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.05539E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.16645E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.6257E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2956E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
46.438
Magnitude:
57
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.6
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Mike DeWine
The Judiciary Committee, though, is where many of the initial concerns about nominees are raised and arise. Often these concerns arise before a hearing is even scheduled. Judicial nominees are required to respond to a very lengthy and a very detailed questionnaire from the Judiciary Committee. They must submit copies of every document they have ever published, any writing they have ever published, and provide copies of every speech they have ever given. If they have previously served as a judge, they must provide information regarding opinions they authored.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0027914624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0022024955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012236592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0011488296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008191704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003013409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002849408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.30665E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.71034E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.34772E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.7013E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
59.042
Magnitude:
89
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.8
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Mike DeWine
There are various background checks conducted on each nominee. Sometimes outside individuals or organizations provide the committee with information about a nominee. Sometimes that information from outside groups comes very early in the process. But sometimes, quite candidly, it comes later on. Each time it comes in, the committee, committee staff, and ultimately the chairman must review that information.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0003699271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002290089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0001347208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
6.95856E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
3.99853E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.8025E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.7538E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.2635E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.801E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.681E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.03E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
65.813
Magnitude:
59
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Mike DeWine
All of this information is, of course, available to every member of the Judiciary Committee and must be thoroughly reviewed before the nominee is granted a hearing by the committee. If questions about a nominee's background or qualifications arise, further inquiry may be necessary. The chairman will schedule a hearing for a nominee only after thorough review of a nominee's preliminary information. At the hearing, a nominee has an opportunity to respond to any remaining concerns about his or her record. But even after a hearing, sometimes followup questions are necessary to properly examine issues regarding the nominee's qualifications. Obviously, this is a long process, as it should be -- as it must be. After all, these are lifetime appointments. These judges will have a tremendous impact on how our laws are interpreted and enforced.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0209678852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.009318893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0070898815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0065117711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.004228768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009012225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001643771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.04206E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.1506E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.8292E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.8306E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
58.465
Magnitude:
135
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
31.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
43
Mike DeWine
Some nominees, of course, have clear records of achievement and superb qualifications. These nominees often move through the committee and to the Senate floor very quickly. Other nominees have records that are really not quite so clear. These nominees take more time for additional investigation and careful consideration. If a nominee is nominated late in a Congress, and that nominee has questions raised about his or her background or qualifications, it is more likely that his nomination will not be considered by the Senate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.74721
VADER
0.807
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0027503618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024437608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013828954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012410644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002072899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001383076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.23799E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.62865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.34757E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.6742E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.9468E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
33.029
Magnitude:
84
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Mike DeWine
If nominees were only considered in the order they were nominated, the process would, of course, grind to a halt. We have heard some comments about that. Some people have argued this is a queuing up process; we just queue up whoever is next in line; they should go next on the Senate floor. But we know that cannot happen. If nominees were only considered in the order they were nominated, the process would grind to a halt as more qualified nominees would back up behind questionable nominees.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
-0.572
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0340910803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.012429386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0052628831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017144239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004581542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004208705
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.16855E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.59936E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.2422E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.822E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.1914E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
42.842
Magnitude:
88
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Mike DeWine
I believe, if it were not for Orrin Hatch's efforts, there would have been far fewer judges confirmed during this session of the Congress. But I am also sure that if Orrin Hatch had not been chairman, other questionable nominations would have been made. Because of this man's integrity, because of this man's honesty, because of this man's proven track record, and because he takes his job so seriously, I am convinced that certain nominations this White House might have considered making simply were never made and were never submitted.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.75
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.636
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0810819853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0048852471
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022041238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.00142158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008899682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001851567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.10817E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.73762E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7027E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.1156E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.8206E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
78.678
Magnitude:
90
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Mike DeWine
I commend Senator Hatch for his efforts in moving the nominees along, but also for his efforts in doing a thorough and complete job. I am very proud to have Orrin Hatch as chairman of this committee. We are very honored to have him serve in that capacity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.92
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0008492641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0008056872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006467668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006240199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.39304E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.38401E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.04188E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.3198E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.1828E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.879E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.169E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Mike DeWine
I thank the Chair. I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.076639792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0174312489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0108612549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0087550412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0035902431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035745757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011510657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008953459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006526219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004568392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.15601E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97.7
Gunning-Fog Score
3
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Thomas). The clerk will call the roll.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0238362321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0214640357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0065403241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0060683797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053729415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009106986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003977938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003725964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.71981E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.25619E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.423E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.1
Gunning-Fog Score
1.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Joe Biden
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Joe Biden
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be able to proceed as in morning business for up to 7 minutes to discuss digital mammography.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4