Fact
ba
.
se
Senate Floor: BIPARTISAN CAMPAIGN REFORM ACT OF 2001--Continued
Topics
Entities
Moderation
37 Speakers
Topics
No topics found
Entities
No entities found
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Chris Dodd Chris Dodd said 383 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
11%
Chris Dodd said 6519 words of a total of 59607 words.
11%
Mitch McConnell Mitch McConnell said 325 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
10%
Mitch McConnell said 5296 words of a total of 59607 words.
9%
Fred Thompson Fred Thompson said 243 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
7%
Fred Thompson said 4230 words of a total of 59607 words.
8%
Jeff Bingaman Jeff Bingaman said 203 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
6%
Jeff Bingaman said 4003 words of a total of 59607 words.
7%
Bill Frist Bill Frist said 204 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
6%
Bill Frist said 3834 words of a total of 59607 words.
7%
Russ Feingold Russ Feingold said 189 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
6%
Russ Feingold said 3712 words of a total of 59607 words.
7%
Phil Gramm Phil Gramm said 137 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
4%
Phil Gramm said 2574 words of a total of 59607 words.
5%
John McCain John McCain said 161 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
5%
John McCain said 2482 words of a total of 59607 words.
5%
John Breaux John Breaux said 98 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
3%
John Breaux said 2165 words of a total of 59607 words.
4%
Robert Torricelli Robert Torricelli said 108 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
4%
Robert Torricelli said 2127 words of a total of 59607 words.
4%
Bob Bennett Bob Bennett said 92 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
3%
Bob Bennett said 2113 words of a total of 59607 words.
4%
Trent Lott Trent Lott said 149 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
5%
Trent Lott said 2112 words of a total of 59607 words.
4%
Carl Levin Carl Levin said 101 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
3%
Carl Levin said 1928 words of a total of 59607 words.
4%
Dick Durbin Dick Durbin said 111 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
4%
Dick Durbin said 1804 words of a total of 59607 words.
4%
Jeff Sessions Jeff Sessions said 103 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
3%
Jeff Sessions said 1796 words of a total of 59607 words.
4%
Jack Reed Jack Reed said 68 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
2%
Jack Reed said 1489 words of a total of 59607 words.
3%
John Edwards John Edwards said 63 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
2%
John Edwards said 1253 words of a total of 59607 words.
3%
John Kerry John Kerry said 53 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
2%
John Kerry said 1128 words of a total of 59607 words.
2%
Arlen Specter Arlen Specter said 49 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
2%
Arlen Specter said 1103 words of a total of 59607 words.
2%
The Presiding Officer The Presiding Officer said 235 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
7%
The Presiding Officer said 1048 words of a total of 59607 words.
2%
Joseph Lieberman Joseph Lieberman said 41 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
2%
Joseph Lieberman said 980 words of a total of 59607 words.
2%
Chuck Schumer Chuck Schumer said 38 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
2%
Chuck Schumer said 748 words of a total of 59607 words.
2%
Hillary Clinton Hillary Clinton said 30 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Hillary Clinton said 724 words of a total of 59607 words.
2%
Harry Reid Harry Reid said 49 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
2%
Harry Reid said 720 words of a total of 59607 words.
2%
Patty Murray Patty Murray said 26 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Patty Murray said 627 words of a total of 59607 words.
2%
John Ensign John Ensign said 22 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
John Ensign said 428 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Paul Wellstone Paul Wellstone said 23 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Paul Wellstone said 422 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Joe Biden Joe Biden said 17 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Joe Biden said 420 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Kay Bailey Hutchison Kay Bailey Hutchison said 16 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Kay Bailey Hutchison said 335 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Tom Daschle Tom Daschle said 20 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Tom Daschle said 284 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Byron Dorgan Byron Dorgan said 17 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Byron Dorgan said 282 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Bill Nelson Bill Nelson said 21 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Bill Nelson said 274 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Don Nickles Don Nickles said 9 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Don Nickles said 122 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Patrick Leahy Patrick Leahy said 2 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Patrick Leahy said 55 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Gordon Smith Gordon Smith said 8 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Gordon Smith said 45 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Blanche Lincoln Blanche Lincoln said 6 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Blanche Lincoln said 44 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Bob Graham Bob Graham said 3 sentences of a total of 3490 sentences.
1%
Bob Graham said 42 words of a total of 59607 words.
1%
Full Transcript
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, I saw my colleague from Minnesota, but I guess he is not now on the floor. We have a couple minutes. My colleague from Kentucky and I talked about this the other day. He makes a very good point about the declining participation in the checkoff system. In fact, the dollar amounts have been raised. If my friend from Kentucky is correct, originally it was $1 for the checkoff. You are not paying more in taxes. It is the money you send in. The checkoff of $1 of your tax returns would be used for the public financing of Presidential races. That number then went up to $3 because there were fewer and fewer people who were actually doing the voluntary checkoff.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.47957
VADER
0.875
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0209981561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0068538524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034535144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011276005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002808485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.11061E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.65713E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.59834E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.03551E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.5251E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.47E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
8.7
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Chris Dodd
His numbers, I believe, are correct. We have seen a decline in the number of people who are voluntarily checking off that $3 of their Federal taxes they are sending in or that are being withheld to be used for these Presidential races.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.2117245225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0314454752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0233481973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0103462182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017135217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005572623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000421674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00023126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.08746E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.78605E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.52664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Chris Dodd
I am worried about that because I think there is an underlying cause for this. The debate we are having about campaign finance reform, while we are not going to adopt public financing for congressional races despite the fact there is a lot of merit going that route in terms of dealing with the constitutional problems that exist in the absence of having some public financing, there is an underlying reason that I think contributes to that declining statistic, and that is the people are disgusted with the whole process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.61904
VADER
-0.691
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
2.4273261428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.038251956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0080034486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0017341712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017217741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011614396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0007568546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007011457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006790115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004191054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.99651E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Chris Dodd
I do not think it is people's lack of patriotism or their lack of understanding how important it is to contribute to strengthening our democracy. People are getting fed up. Witness that last year despite the overwhelming amount of attention and advertising on a national Presidential race, a race that included Ralph Nader and the Green Party, there was Pat Buchanan and the Reform Party, the Democratic candidate, Al Gore, and his running mate from my home State, Joe Lieberman; President Bush and Richard Cheney. Out of 200 million eligible voters in this country, only 100 million participated. One out of every two eligible voters in this country decided they were not going to make a choice for President of the United States and Vice President, not to mention the congressional races, the Senate races, and gubernatorial races that occurred.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.37949
VADER
0.823
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
2.1086864173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0307569135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0191116895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032164993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008799556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006212676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005278274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005259973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001101368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001090869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.2315E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
44
Sprache Difficult Word Count
49
Chris Dodd
On the Federal election for the leader of the oldest continuous democracy in the world, one out of every two adults in this country said they were not going to participate. I know some may have had legitimate excuses, but I suspect a significant majority of those who did not participate knew it was election day, did not have some overriding family matter that caused them to miss voting. I think they made a conscious decision not to vote. I think they decided they were not going to show up, and I cannot express in our native language adequately the deep, deep concern I have over that fact and what appears to be a growing number of people.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.039
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.111825543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0073626012
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045156979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029283043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000468248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003143376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003048993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002668007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.75416E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.61607E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4112E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Chris Dodd
I hear it particularly among younger people. I visit a lot of high schools in my home State of Connecticut. I get a sense that too many of our younger people are embracing the notions held by one out of every two adult Americans in the last election, that they are not going to participate by showing up to choose the leader of our country. I suspect that a good part of the reason is that people are just disgusted by what they see and how elections are run when they see this mindless advertising, these 30-second spots, the attack ads that go after each other as if this was somehow an athletic contest rather than a debate of ideas where we are talking about the future of our country and what the priorities of a nation ought to be.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.26826
VADER
-0.7
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0091889735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047949445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031304317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002887357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001883885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001066154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.20741E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.19106E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.2019E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2541E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3826E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Chris Dodd
I, too, am very concerned with the declining statistics that my friend from Kentucky has identified, but I think it is more a poll not about public financing, I think it is a poll we ought to pay attention to, what the American people are saying, at least in the majority of cases, I believe: We think the system is not working very well. We think the system is out of control. We think there is too much money in politics; that our voices do not get heard; that we cannot afford to participate in these contests where contributions of $1,000, now $2,000 per individual, that people can write a check now for $37,500 if this McCain-Feingold bill is adopted.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.4591077566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0109194523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0057120233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0026183152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011162633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005592002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001874943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.085E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.73919E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.573E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.9154E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Chris Dodd
Last year -- I said this over and over in the past week and a half -- there were only 1,200 people in this country who wrote the maximum check of $25,000; 1,200 people out of 280 million Americans. We now have raised that because this hasn't been enough. We are told you can't finance these campaigns with maximum contributions of $25,000 in Federal elections. We are raising it to $37,500. That is per individual, per year. Double that for a primary election. That gets you to $75,000. Of course, if it is a husband and wife, it is $150,000. We had to debate that. I commend my colleague from California who negotiated that number down.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.494
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0416878407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0196704874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0071873008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034345965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007396099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004712936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004581717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004418562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003034087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001320536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.78353E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.5
Gunning-Fog Score
7.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
9.5
Automated Readability Index
2.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Chris Dodd
Those who wanted that number higher wanted $100,000 per individual, $200,000 for a husband and wife. We are told the system is financially bankrupt. We don't have enough money in politics, we are told.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.511
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1817998593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0102208891
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0023881863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015132048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002421004
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002315282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
5.16084E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.7586E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.7188E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.5535E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.57E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Chris Dodd
That has more to do with these declining numbers of people voluntarily checking off for some of their tax dollars to be used to publicly finance the Presidential races in America. I am hopeful the adoption of the McCain-Feingold bill, if it is adopted, will at least turn people's opinion in a direction that says at least we are beginning to do something about these elections.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.511
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.8986757137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0617490732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0317430095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0231219907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0142539735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000381346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002717183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000156091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001148447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.82843E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.33265E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Chris Dodd
For those reasons, I commend, again, the principal authors of this bill and those who are supporting it. But I don't think it is enough. People are still turned off, to put it mildly, on how the races are run and on how politics is conducted. There will always be some; I am not suggesting we will get 100-percent participation. I oppose any laws that require people to vote as some countries do. We better do a lot better job in convincing more than just one out of two adult Americans they ought to participate in choosing the leaders of our Nation than we presently are.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.923
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0310919218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017746315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012049411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000948844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008261017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001183645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001053689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.34396E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.43738E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.40461E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.627E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Chris Dodd
If those numbers continue to decline and we trail the rest of the world as we lecture them about democracy and the importance of participating, I will say again, you put this country in peril and these institutions that have survived for more than 200 years, and the public support for them will decline. That, more than anything else, is what ought to preoccupy the attention of each and every one of us, regardless of our views on the particular aspects of amendments. Every single one of us privileged to serve in this Chamber, who have a voice and vote on how we might conduct the political debate in this Nation, needs to take notice of what the American public is saying when they go to the polls or don't go to the polls on election day and exercise their right that people have spilled blood for, for over two centuries, not only in our first great revolution but in a civil war that threatened to divide and destroy this country, through two world wars, wars in the 20th century and other such contests in which Americans, in countless numbers, lost their lives to protect and defend.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.77778
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.77778
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.7346
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.964
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0103028411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018168033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0017115863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016961758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015229146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007166113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003941231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.29921E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.1306E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.1142E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.654E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
17.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
41
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45
Chris Dodd
We are not asked to put our lives on the line. We voluntarily seek these positions. If we are fortunate enough to be chosen by our constituents to be here, we bear a very high degree of responsibility during the brief amount of time the Good Lord gives us to represent the constituencies that have chosen us to do what is right, not only for our own time but that future generations will inherit, as we have inherited, from the sacrifices of those who came before us, the privilege of being here to see to it that this wonderful ideal and vision of democracy is perpetuated throughout this country for, hopefully, centuries to come.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.29584
VADER
0.904
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1571951667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0485784461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0335049088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0324570719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0175575231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0047111382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00415094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006238682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005289713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002528468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.47798E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Chris Dodd
For those reasons, I hope while this amendment may be rejected, we could find more common ground between Democrats and Republicans on how to restore the public's confidence in the electoral process in this country. That is at the heart of what McCain-Feingold is all about, despite all the debates about various minutiae in the bill or ideas to be added to it. Our solemn responsibility, in addition to dealing with the issues of the day, is to see to it the process by which we choose people to make those decisions enjoys the broad-based support of the American public. It is in jeopardy today. We better take it more seriously than we are.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.57143
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.18958
VADER
0.916
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.3686693264
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2931070747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0265217153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0255243824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0218820278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0095189447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0021887327
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015626849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004960918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.84084E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.716E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
Chris Dodd
I yield the floor, suggest the absence of a quorum, and ask that the time be charged against the bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
-0.202
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0510675192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0065520289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030999461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0023533041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001166082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000555084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003134803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002795863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.1357E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.25E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Bunning). Without objection, it is so ordered. The clerk will call the roll.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.4623066634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1826762804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1453906414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.019662366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0195753077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095878895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033642416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020944532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012239335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.22385E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.04579E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.1
Gunning-Fog Score
4.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
The assistant bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0472734973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0075197488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0043717275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016144291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002891852
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002696372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001014628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.12911E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.89801E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.2544E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.277E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.027921013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0229854457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.014956019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018318786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009205359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005670217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.80537E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.87521E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.72375E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.9685E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8126E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0693007139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0529821031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0164457771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027507765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015704176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008547056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004700537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003603292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001778593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001725964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001703806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Joe Biden
Mr. President, I rise today in support of the amendment being offered by my friend and colleague from Iowa, Senator Harkin. Earlier this week, Senator Kerry and I offered a similar amendment that called for voluntary spending limits and partial public financing. Senator Harkin's amendment differs in some respects to the proposal that we offered, but it still seeks to alleviate the same problem: How can we reduce the obscene amount of special interest money that is being spent in Senate campaigns today? And while I know that Senator Harkin's amendment will not pass, I nevertheless believe that it is truly needed to reform our campaign finance system.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.739
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0275154453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0137695199
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0118590484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0033496657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031974338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019664225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002222564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001077899
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.04207E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.3478E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.702E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
46
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41
Joe Biden
Since 1976, while the general cost of living has tripled, total spending on congressional campaigns has gone up eightfold. For the winning candidates, the average House race went from $87,000 to $816,000 in 2000. And here on the Senate side, winners spent an average of $609,000 in 1976, but last year that average shot up to $7 million.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.502
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0334299286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0298175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0229207755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0160302137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0142220408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.007965789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0043366326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0038484723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005326277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002194642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.82125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Joe Biden
The FEC estimates that last year more than $1.8 billion in federally regulated money was spent on federal campaigns alone, and that doesn't even count the huge amount of soft money that went into attempts to influence federal elections. That has been roughly estimated to reach as high as nearly another $700 million.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.103
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.519766286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.2966745989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.1104539842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0650534406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0643686508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0598094775
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0446934602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0283792964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0207116827
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.010548508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.004300072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.1
Gunning-Fog Score
18.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Joe Biden
I have been calling for public financing of congressional campaigns for a very long time: since 1973, my first year in this body. And, as my colleagues who have been here for a while know, I have taken to this floor again and again over the years to urge us to solve the public's crisis in confidence and do the right thing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0550284807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0366158551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0230023914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0158949624
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0150020671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.007957976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0043768669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0015311673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005085706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.358E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.746E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Joe Biden
To be clear, I would prefer full public financing of campaigns that would reduce spending and completely eliminate the link between special interest money and candidates. I have long held that such a system is the only true, comprehensive reform that would help restore the American people's faith in our democracy and allow candidates to compete on an equal footing where the merits of their ideas outweigh the size of their pocketbook.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.86667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.26868
VADER
0.97
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0113530405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0013597055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000576968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002939749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001608046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
6.40751E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
6.19914E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.7259E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.4535E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.0491E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2719E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Joe Biden
But as the problems in our system have escalated in recent years, so too has my despair over our failure to see real reforms enacted, not just debated. That is why I am here again to see that we take at least a step toward achieving these much needed reforms. Senator Harkin's amendment is one such step, and urge my colleagues to support it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
-0.681
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0127712396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0063287589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0030001987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002076007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011914872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011286903
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010320883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002073922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.52462E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.06481E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.34741E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays on the amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0232375096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0193204163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0099223194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0061932849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0041724747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007264483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004108272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.52136E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.60661E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57332E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.984E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
95
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0480912044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0382468512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0364740234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0046040426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0035026893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0021614376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015905236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008655726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001504437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001279813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.1265E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.2
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
There is a sufficient second.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0353803858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0158433191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003091072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022226634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010936944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009817362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005180485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.41205E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.31297E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.13308E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.02425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
The question is on agreeing to amendment No. 155. The clerk will call the roll.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.052
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.4601612687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1793481992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1425444614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0194062668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0193566288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0094706957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003285785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020290337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011885591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.04716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.9818E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
89
Gunning-Fog Score
7.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Harry Reid
I announce that the Senator from Hawaii (Mr. Akaka) is necessarily absent.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0117450239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0106795254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011748657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008989135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003775868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001089043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.07561E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
5.77367E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.37545E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.11135E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.94718E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Harry Reid
I further announce that, if present and voting, the Senator from Hawaii (Mr. Akaka) would vote "aye."
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0102196704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0098155455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012107223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000633617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004964363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002961367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.96039E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9113E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.949E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.55E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.2E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.9
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.025777088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0110272485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0071683135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0051435294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028058239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020013218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012216641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003661219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002275277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.72812E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2774E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.7
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0161576609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0091579626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045070334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005233584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002818659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001451415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.64514E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.77096E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.6832E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0465E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.306E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.9
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
1.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Trent Lott
I move to lay that motion on the table.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0914108823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0245784613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0197024143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0105795843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007783257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003649725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000131695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001306284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.00991E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.10243E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0929E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
94.3
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
3.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Trent Lott
The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0882713648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0211156686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0076866032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052385436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0018690991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006355227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00059664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004030825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002468337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001532096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.44282E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.7
Gunning-Fog Score
4
Coleman-Liau Index
4.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senator from Delaware be added as a cosponsor of the Harkin amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0154473804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0063045496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.002904688
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020282445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0019335581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008081696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003819266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.16694E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.73318E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.53463E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.2189E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0361569691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0123679303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005226368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032287062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004474664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002673014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002296532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000150525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001410073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9537E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.2365E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Trent Lott
Mr. President, we have been prepared for 2 months now to have this full debate and votes on amendments, and to actually get to a conclusion. Senator McCain and I have talked, and Senator McConnell and I have talked, and the agreement all along was that we would have amendments, full debate for 2 weeks, and then we would go to a conclusion.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0665692147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.031655308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00802184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0046918238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.00456343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006500912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003492631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001075841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.18684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.35509E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.92E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Trent Lott
I assure the Senate that we are going to do that. We can do it tonight at a reasonable hour, we can do it at midnight, or Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. But I think we have a responsibility to complete action on this bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.013387535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0018625989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006087449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0001346079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.68304E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
5.76577E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.5261E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
3.50549E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.18802E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0258E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.935E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.7
Gunning-Fog Score
7.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Trent Lott
I hope the concern I have now that maybe amendments are going to start multiplying when, in fact, there are no more than one or two amendments that really are still critical that are out there to be offered and debated and voted on -- maybe there are more. And I don't want to demean any Senator's amendment, but we have been on this now for the agreed-to almost 2 weeks. Anybody who thinks that by just beginning to drag this out and coming up with more amendments, we will carry it over until next week, that is not going to be the case.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
-0.437
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0277823478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0037851907
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033447024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020941237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005174812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000411606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004022994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002631232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.54238E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.88211E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Trent Lott
Everybody has labored -- sometimes with difficulty -- to be fair with each other and give this thing a full airing and get some results, and you can debate about whether they are good or bad as long as you want to. At some point, we have to vote and move on.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0498406647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0105865176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041713491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002955974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0018264971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004441541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001939734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001410826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.06678E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.44943E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.38455E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Trent Lott
We have very serious problems in this country. We need to address them. We have to pass a budget resolution. We have to take into consideration the needs of the country in terms of funding for programs, whether it is education, agriculture, defense, health care. We need to take whatever actions we can to provide confidence and a boost in job security and the economy. We have an energy crisis that will not go away. We need to get on to those issues.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.58779
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.22222
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.22222
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.42744
VADER
0.677
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0278922787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0057306326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021522477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017417555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014534313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0012353504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0002426072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.42439E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.09293E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.92758E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.218E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
10.7
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Trent Lott
Again, not to demean this issue at all -- it is very important -- but we will have done what we promised to do, and now it is time we begin to look for the conclusion and be prepared to move on to other issues next week. I just wanted to remind Senators on both sides of our discussion and my commitment to follow up with the agreement.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.93
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0045637866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0013592895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003967871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001922371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
9.25766E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
7.5724E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.43841E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.16738E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.14447E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.30929E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.015E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
John McCain
Will the majority leader yield?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0710691733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0250579935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0179360111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029444671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00292069
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0018133242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016737951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008930758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002299855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.10397E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.10792E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Trent Lott
Yes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0038473863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00159149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014966859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009714765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003978761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001959718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001045793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.37058E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.64332E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.52837E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.5556E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
John McCain
I thank the majority leader, and I thank Senator McConnell and Senator Dodd, who have managed this bill, I think, with efficiency and, I believe, in a total environment of cooperation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.758
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2046259586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0062964573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0045082157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028650091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0017955344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007446647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003013121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
6.29166E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.8337E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.8082E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.46E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
John McCain
But as we said all during last week, a couple times when we only had two or three amendments, we intended to be done by tonight or the end of this week. We have disposed of some. We will have an amendment that I think is very important that is about to be addressed soon. After that, there are not any major issues. We should finalize this bill so that we can move forward and none of us has to stay here over the weekend.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.265
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0108597014
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0099908306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0072375784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0034246274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008429461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006525192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004176168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002397623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001407133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.26837E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.9398E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7
SMOG Index
9.5
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
John McCain
I want to say the majority leader is correct. We all agreed that we could get this thing done in 2 weeks if we allowed the 2 weeks. So there is no reason whatsoever that we should not enter into time agreements on specific amendments and a time for a final vote on this amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.252
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0305623573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0250914862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0189237559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049777344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010320971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003551813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003124571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00027861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001923954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.55614E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.201E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Trent Lott
I thank Senator McCain. That discussion was not just between Senator McCain and me, but also with the Democratic leader, Senator Feingold -- we were all in the loop. We all had an understanding of how we would bring this to an eventual conclusion.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.19
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1816228149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1639703754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0691736583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.032834438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0272355246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0138287316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0096503536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0027864115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016858821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.20235E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6004E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Mitch McConnell
Will the leader yield?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.4624258727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1802861691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1427570707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0195652872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0194166307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0094771181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033284654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020735239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011975429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.13361E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.01689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Trent Lott
I am glad to yield to Senator McConnell.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0833485276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0543347967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0045880315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0014919289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005842291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002040219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.98586E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.52745E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.4194E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.959E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.49E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.8
Gunning-Fog Score
3.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
1.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Mitch McConnell
I say to the distinguished majority leader, nobody more passionately opposes this bill than I do, but I am prepared to move to final passage today. There is one important amendment left on nonseverability, which is about to be the pending business before the Senate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.708
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0271558732
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0101018908
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0067519897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015717314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007225328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003930499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003529503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001359959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.19352E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.03058E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4896E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Mitch McConnell
I say to my friend from Arizona, we may have a few sort of cats-and- dogs amendments, as Senator Dole used to call them, but we are basically through on this side.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0287915784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0213972817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0053419812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0044367807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000886721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005001844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002784063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.67253E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.10313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.138E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5259E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.5
Gunning-Fog Score
15.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Trent Lott
Can I inquire of Senator Dodd, does he have any idea what might be outstanding and when we can move to a conclusion on this legislation?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0345972803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.006002291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010001191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009938533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002440402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002034994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001236697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.78245E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.08628E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.06903E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.8231E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Chris Dodd
I will be happy to, Mr. President. First of all, the past week and a half has been a rather remarkable week and a half in the Senate. We have had very few quorum calls. I do not know the total number of amendments we have considered, but they have been extensive, back and forth.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0051220126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0012980932
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011093717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010295786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003837919
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001971101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001048191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.05778E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.7082E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3677E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.409E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.9
Gunning-Fog Score
7.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
8.4
Automated Readability Index
2.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Chris Dodd
I find it somewhat amusing that someone else's amendment is a cat or a dog, but if it is your amendment, it is a profoundly significant proposal.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.435
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0025721485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0007754288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005588814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004596789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001494188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001273023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.92427E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.46321E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.51434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.2244E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.805E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Chris Dodd
We dealt yesterday with the opposition's efforts to raise the hard number limits, and now a severability amendment from the opposition. Those are fundamentally important amendments but amendments that may try to enhance and strengthen the bill from those who support the legislation are a cat or a dog.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
0.781
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0063611478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049576582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049500333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006943054
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004507794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003772111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001108257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.91575E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.22206E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.0158E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.9952E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Chris Dodd
Our list has not expanded, I say to the majority leader. The list of amendments is about the same as it has been. There are about 12 or 13 amendments. There is a list of 21, which has been the consistent number for the past week. We just dealt with one of them -- Senator Harkin's -- this morning. It was laid down last night. Senator Bingaman, Senator Durbin, Senator Dorgan, and Senator Levin come to mind immediately. I think Senator Clinton as well. These do not require much time.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.34
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2184318146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0778822927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0297699502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0033517877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022911398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018221077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002498512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001087048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.48112E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.6231E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.573E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.7
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
10.1
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Chris Dodd
We are prepared to move forward, I say to the majority leader, and if it takes going into tonight, going into tomorrow to finish it up, Saturday, or Sunday, whatever it takes, because I know we want to finish the bill, we fully respect that. I support that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.82
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0901813095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0524962554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0108133259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012599578
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006392031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000613028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001853334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001562842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.91194E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.66674E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.37771E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Chris Dodd
I have an obligation -- if I can complete this thought. There are those on this side who support McCain-Feingold, and have for years, who have ideas they think will enhance and strengthen this legislation. While this is an important amendment we are about to consider, there are other amendments that should be heard.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.7
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0204699652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0193521642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029832203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0026483698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009430587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004121949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002149941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.31807E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.94326E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.9123E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.28473E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Chris Dodd
I hope my colleagues will respect the rights of Members to offer amendments and be heard on them. There certainly is no effort over here to delay this at all. We will stay here however long, I am told by the leadership. Unfortunately, the Democratic leader cannot be here at this moment, but I am told he takes the position that if it takes being here all weekend, we will be here all weekend to complete it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.19
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0292285142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0230727499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0128349813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003440927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019998948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005177502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002955293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002628676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001415083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001037692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.98334E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Trent Lott
I want everybody to understand that I am prepared to do that, too. Instead of that being a threat, it is a promise, No. 1, but No. 2, it is to urge Senators to work with the managers to identify the amendments we are going to have to consider, and if it can be done by voice vote, let us get time agreements on them. We should be prepared to move to table, if that is what is required, too.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.166
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0585824077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0172336746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0139602387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.00465226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025871626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002275065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.00036496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.84726E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.88253E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.17163E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.34802E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Trent Lott
We have an opportunity to make progress and complete this bill. We are going to do that. I want to make sure everybody understands it, so everybody needs to start making plans, if we are going to have to stay here Friday and Saturday, and take actions to allow that to happen.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.002042881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008698524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002899584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001989536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.000179464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
1.41299E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.08419E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.052E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.177E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.408E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.83E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Chris Dodd
A point, if I can, Mr. President. I am informed that we have dealt with 24 amendments about equally divided; 24 left, I am sorry, both Democratic and Republican amendments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
-0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0171262451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.009748515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0041304938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012640341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005549341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001740605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001576337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.42087E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.26673E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.08172E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.301E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67
Gunning-Fog Score
9.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Chris Dodd
I know, for instance, Senator Lieberman and Senator Thompson have an amendment, one of the outstanding amendments. Maybe it can be worked out. Senator Bingaman has one that has been worked out. It is important to note there is a good-faith effort obviously to complete this work, but I do not want to see us put in a position now, having considered a lot of these amendments, that we are going to start telling people who have had amendments pending -- Senator Durbin has been on me and talking to me for the past 10 days about when can he bring his amendment up; also Senator Harkin and Senator Levin.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.415
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4528702702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1490976196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0191658139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0170944302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0136114453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037209236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005969861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.47012E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.63286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.19849E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.6517E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Chris Dodd
I have been trying to orchestrate this the best I can, but I do not want them put in the position of all of a sudden because we completed the amendments the opponents of the legislation care the most about, that we are going to deny or curtail in some way the rights of other Senators who care just as deeply about their proposals and not provide adequate time for them to be heard.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.716
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.118462299
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0698381744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0258230109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0114820978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0073051779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034156383
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0016052423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014022446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003538971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.54524E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.33278E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
15.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Chris Dodd
We are prepared to go forward. I know the next amendment is from Senator Frist on severability. I have a number of requests, I say to the majority leader, from people who want to be heard on this amendment. I know the proponents of the amendment do as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4335542675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0818564382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0149098429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0071928553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019668292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001205095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008796259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.82058E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.37898E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.0054E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9203E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.4
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Harry Reid
Before the majority leader leaves the floor -- --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0486244768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0198583526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0026885586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011162315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005376582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005036748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001190252
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001054588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.92742E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.13839E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.8347E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Trent Lott
I will be glad to yield to Senator Reid.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1019329415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0091363574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017010565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009129072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004789386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004550434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002138931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.53358E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.0667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.93867E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3482E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
94.3
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.5
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Harry Reid
I said this morning, I have been working trying to help Senator Dodd. One of my assignments has been to work with individual Senators. We have had people, as Senator Dodd indicated, who have been waiting the entire 9 days we have been on this floor to offer amendments. They come to me and Senator Dodd a couple times a day.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.6639744621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1964328578
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0560463115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0328026188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053167478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041102579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002798835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001763966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001362342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.05133E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.0708E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Harry Reid
Looking at simple mathematics, I say to the majority leader, it is going to be really hard to do this. If we cut down the time by two- thirds, it is still going to get us into sometime tomorrow. If that is the case, that is the case.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
-0.414
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0966926571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0511763792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0287048315
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0149135536
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0099630794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017398115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004978036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004633912
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.36262E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.01691E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.32544E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Harry Reid
Senator Bingaman, Senator Durbin -- these people want to offer their amendments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0308041577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0105534782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.010275183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0052236821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0045235422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00114037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002703306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001174486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.86877E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.5393E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.49938E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Trent Lott
I say to Senator Reid, he always does good work, not just with Senator Dodd but with this side, too. He is an ombudsman for us all. We do not want to cut off anybody, but all I am saying is we are going to complete this bill this week and everybody needs to know that. If we go into Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, I only have one commitment, and I really did not want to do it anyway, so I will be delighted to stay here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.884
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1916104229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0319793005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0027240632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019002226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006044265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003616202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001564392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.57493E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.18556E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.2799E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.6267E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71
Gunning-Fog Score
11.9
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Trent Lott
With that, I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0206607947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0149833257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018208379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009928747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003347405
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002721358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.85413E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.27262E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5446E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.0464E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.543E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Chris Dodd
Is there some particular constituency in Mississippi the Senator wants to inform?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1144234557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0862765126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0191403189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0086629909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0080925412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020267034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015903901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002118983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002050507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.04319E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.34937E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
18.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Trent Lott
Actually, it is in a State other than my home State.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0781400769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0351827126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0278446387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0054405351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027323576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015150415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002916838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001381141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.48299E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.75748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6924E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.3
Gunning-Fog Score
4.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
1.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Chris Dodd
I thought the majority leader might want to make that clarification. I think we are prepared now to go to the Frist amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0565599068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0363253814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032044733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025454408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0016788228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015243051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003750095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002454728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.46909E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.70719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.23295E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Bill Frist
Mr. President, I ask for immediate consideration of my amendment, which I believe is at the desk.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0221780443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005734968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030459441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028829998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008604025
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001724694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.06102E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.43217E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.08967E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.94858E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4713E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0592382392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0038966657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0029756453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014783762
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006670643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003540068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.96368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.21786E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7373E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.773E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.29E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.9
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Bill Frist
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.009555641
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0060763305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012441978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009582989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007804217
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006831347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.94066E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.86856E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.83712E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.69855E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.3115E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0348152214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.009478836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0066744848
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0051961579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019882187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005973745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001388427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001168048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.71992E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.85597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.04355E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.5
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, can I have a copy of the amendment? We have not seen the amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.103914272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0203382951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0039207713
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014024052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007062877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.01087E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.78208E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.42522E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.3868E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.006E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.39E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
7.3
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0159756004
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0092537797
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0081180173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040869472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0018812627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011303448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002196702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001046026
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.34104E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.2611E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.59E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.8
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
1.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Bill Frist
Mr. President, I rise to speak to the amendment which has been offered by myself and Senator Breaux that I believe gives us the opportunity -- and I encourage my colleagues to pay attention to the debate over the next 2 or 3 hours because it gives us the opportunity to assess where we are today in the bill, as amended, and to understand the implications for each of us, for people who are interested in participating in the political process both today and also for years to come.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.73333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.6864
VADER
0.881
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0365340005
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0232784703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.010156144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0051244551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012694197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003533086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.85583E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.35364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5891E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.84111E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5812E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Bill Frist
I am going to refer back, again, to set the big picture and then update my colleagues, to a diagram that I believe is important. It is simple, but sometimes when we look at all these lines, it is confusing, and that is the nature of the whole campaign finance apparatus. This chart summarizes that when you pull or push in one area, it has effects throughout the system. It is very important because the issue we are addressing is what is called the nonseverability and the severability clause in the underlying McCain-Feingold bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.164
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0713798683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0404883467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0125038117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0111356116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0077828125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0026307065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008962847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001923024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.41364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.00023E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.4709E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Bill Frist
Money flows into the system from the top of my chart down to the bottom. This is the political process. At the top of the chart is where money comes from, and it is all these blue lines. My colleagues do not need to focus on what these blue lines are right now, but I do want them to focus on the funnels, where this money is collected and where it goes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.431
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1697741682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0254528131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0188720776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0150466207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0063272986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0022264436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019728634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.61746E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.01594E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.32701E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.941E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Bill Frist
As I said before, there are seven funnels, when one looks at all the political money that comes in and where it goes to affect free speech, political voice.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment > Threatening
0.3244023304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2603600034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2401736565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0705383369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0297319959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001137661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005567057
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002562286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001794885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.964E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.59105E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Bill Frist
We have the individual candidate who can receive money from individuals, and we will talk about what we did yesterday in increasing what I call the contribution limits in terms of the hard dollars, the Federal dollars.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0430390879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0390422938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0128117113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0087727414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0051978135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0023472705
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009472221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000356601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002116042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.07698E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.78687E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Bill Frist
There have been changes to the underlying McCain-Feingold bill that are very positive. What angers people the most is that the individual candidate is losing his or her voice today. It might be a challenger; it might be an incumbent. Over time, because of the erosion from inflation on the one hand, without any adjustments in the Federal dollars of the hard dollars, but also the increasing influence, this is what angers the American people, the influence issue groups, special interest groups have on the system, all of which, if it grows too much, will overshadow and overwhelm the voice of the individual candidate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.369
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1077220892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0938220182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0150942884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0089662921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029233683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019070303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009422936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004845601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.79693E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.25508E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.09572E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Bill Frist
They might be talking education, Medicare reform, military defense of the country, but the issue group, the unions, the corporations right now that have to disclose very little, because very little is regulated in this arena, have become increasingly powerful at the expense of the individual candidate who is out there doing his or her best, traveling across Tennessee or across any State in this country with a voice that no longer is being heard.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.838
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0483711628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0429435808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0092947805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039088885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012766139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012545421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.12457E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.10748E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.11374E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.6173E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.477E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Bill Frist
I say that because it is this relative balance that has gotten out of kilter. Members on both sides of the aisle have been doing their best to address this over the last 2 weeks.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2950872527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0226348886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0161112155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0067357454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0050639406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008352918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.67764E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.97518E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.26617E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.524E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8358E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
6.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Bill Frist
Political action committees, we talked a little bit about that, as long as we understand that corporations, unions, issue groups can all channel money, political action groups, to the individual candidates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0124038939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.012094729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0071605529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0052078358
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029046798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004985842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001048258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.41261E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.46997E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.0814E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.43E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
11.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Bill Frist
The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are in this box on this chart, and we traditionally have been able to collect both Federal hard dollars and soft or non-Federal dollars. Again, it all has been disclosed. Everything in the green on the chart is fully disclosed. You can hold people accountable to that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1227022847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0102895276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0047538811
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022877663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006808395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002916023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002076463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001130676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.17057E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.86315E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Bill Frist
That is where the party system has worked. Our party system has traditionally worked to accentuate or amplify the voice of the individual candidate. You can see that the party hard money goes to the individual candidate, the soft money subsequently will be used to reinforce that voice of the individual candidate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.21888
VADER
0.772
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0201400893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0132813017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0048891994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0042141346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016437305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013119962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003329541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002770454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000116456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.91184E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.89813E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Bill Frist
It is very important to understand this role of the party has real value in a system today which has changed radically, which, unfortunately, has pulled the power away from the individual candidate over to the corporations, unions, the special issue groups, groups created specifically around an issue used to overpower the voice of the individual candidate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.816
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0806119409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0140995428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0038781887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034341836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014081021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008311353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001813088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001805679
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.46634E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9488E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.771E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Bill Frist
Again, this part of the chart -- the party hard and party soft money, PACs, and individual candidates -- has very little disclosure by corporations, unions, issue groups -- very little in terms of accountability or regulation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0135417446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0091874921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0080568592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0062231942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013766558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012942044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007118747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.0954E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.94E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.2539E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.459E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Bill Frist
What have we done? This is where we are today having not passed the underlying bill as of yet. What have we done over the last 10 days of the discussion? We have had good amendments today that have been debated in a very thoughtful way. We saw the earlier chart with the funnels still on the chart.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.76
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0061239094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0041553998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039186667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.001097259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007036207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006104285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001221825
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.16917E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.59605E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.08467E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3189E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
7.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Bill Frist
With the underlying McCain-Feingold and the amendments that have passed, we have the following:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.117634132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0578467618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0148256178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0071445378
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0052862117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.003863766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003843238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003698654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003592861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.38519E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.4481E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Bill Frist
Yesterday, we increased the contribution limits. We already had contributions defined historically but we increased the hard dollar limits for the individual candidates. We argued yesterday. Some people were for, some were against, and a compromise was reached. We have to point out the fact that the value of the individual contributions, even in what we approved yesterday, is not the same value we gave it in 1974 because it does not meet a correction for inflation. That was increased yesterday. That helps a little bit. Again, it is not up to 1974 standards, but it helps to give more voice to the individual candidate. That is why that is important. That is why you had the people who feel strongest about reform coming forward saying, absolutely, on both sides of the aisle, we have to increase these limits that individual candidates can receive.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.53333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.53333
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.1421
VADER
0.974
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2408182016
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0284234062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0057881971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028741437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002649936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003975303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002279517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002011237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.47161E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.28027E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.16278E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Bill Frist
Second, the underlying McCain-Feingold bill does something very important. I am spending time with this because we have to see that the compromise achieved in McCain-Feingold has resulted in a balance. We have to be very careful not to disrupt. Not us in the Senate. We have spoken on it through an amendment earlier this morning, but we had the careful balance disrupted by the courts, resulting in a detrimental impact on the overall system, which does the opposite of what we as elected officials want or the American people want -- making the system worse.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16705
VADER
-0.099
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0207463308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002969757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001301167
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008117297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006246349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004363991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003945729
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001070274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.50016E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.71369E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.73802E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Bill Frist
No. 2, McCain-Feingold, as amended today, increased contribution limits but takes out party soft money from individuals, through corporations, unions, issue groups through sponsorships. All the soft money that comes to the parties is gone. That just about wipes out 50 percent of what the Republican Party, say, of the Senate, has, along with the impact it can have. So it diminishes our voice perhaps 20 percent, perhaps 50 percent, perhaps 60 percent. Whatever our voice is now, which, again, is fully disclosed, highly regulated, where we can be held accountable, aimed at giving voice to the individual candidate, it, today, if McCain-Feingold passed, now is gone. Why? Because we have eliminated the soft party money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.954
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0204304422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0145301194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0125687235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0031458563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002838878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019553911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0012658823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012194036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002259202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.45425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.7883E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Bill Frist
The third key point applying to our amendment, you can see we are wiping out the party soft money which gives voice to the individual candidate. The balancing act achieved in the underlying McCain-Feingold bill is that, since we restricted speech, or we rationed political discourse, or we have in some way put restrictions on the use of resources that affect speech, you sure better do it out here as well. If you don't, I guarantee the money will keep coming to the system, and the money instead of coming here will all flow to the area of least resistance. That is, the special interest groups, the unions, the corporations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.896
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0296979735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041161493
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002503165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0016527072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013365259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004396251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003978139
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002444091
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002384368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.6869E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.19917E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Bill Frist
It is not any more complicated than that, but I am building up to be able to answer why you have the nonseverability.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0589746749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0074654126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011816041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006366352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003083196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
6.81852E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.76092E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.24612E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.554E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0542E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.688E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Bill Frist
Now I have dollar signs indicated on this chart and I will come back to that. They don't mean anything in terms of overall quantity. Qualitatively, you can see the individual candidate spends money, the party spends money, the party soft money is gone under McCain-Feingold. The restrictions put in for constitutional reasons are the Snowe- Jeffords amendment; we voted on it earlier today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0106050786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0082735089
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025862868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009890021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009486947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001671137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001508094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.54452E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.3277E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5237E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.447E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Bill Frist
Put restrictions on speech party soft money here, and you counterbalance that with restricting speech or rationing speech or basically saying 60 days before an election you can't engage fully in political speech under the Jeffords-Snowe provision.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
-0.08
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0138670774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0057544596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0039338458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004338955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003902747
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001110967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.40218E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.77952E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.88999E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.5749E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.507E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Bill Frist
It attempts to limit the role and influence of special interest versus candidates and parties through the electioneering provision. It doesn't take care of direct mail, phone calls, or get out the vote. That money can come over and include that, but the electioneering, the broadcast provisions are of Snowe-Jeffords. I will come back to that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.523
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0321457977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0206544748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0164447571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0066220287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018347897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0015026382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001566657
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.10122E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.58322E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.09947E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.439E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Bill Frist
The careful balance, achieved by a compromise, no question. As we have gone through this process and as McCain-Feingold was developed in negotiation, it is a compromise, trying to achieve balance. The underlying bill tried to achieve balance and the two provisions we are talking about today are underlying provisions. They are not amendments added on, a poison pill, but two existing provisions we will link together in this narrow, highly targeted nonseverability clause. Those are linking party soft money with the Snowe-Jeffords provision.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0619492552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0094180468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0053846983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0024184368
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008223177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006440751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002081058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001203
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.93338E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.189E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.015E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Bill Frist
McCain-Feingold has attempted to achieve balance by eliminating party soft money and having the Snowe-Jeffords provision. That balance has been achieved as crafted by the authors in the original bill and not altered by amendments. That is very important because people will say what about the Wellstone amendment. That is not part of this. It is the underlying provisions. McCain-Feingold is built on that basic understanding I have just outlined.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.724
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.005112794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0034996545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0029948933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007404653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002160879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001806576
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001168661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.60306E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.7213E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.6283E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5749E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Bill Frist
I argue that the last thing we want to do is upset that balance for the reasons I said. We have the potential for opening the floodgates if we allow party money to be eliminated and all of a sudden we remove, for constitutional reasons or a court does later, the Snowe-Jeffords amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.3890470369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0108703731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0100539844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021199276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008734143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000143543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.57252E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.13044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.57343E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.9404E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5355E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Bill Frist
The next chart will show what would happen if all of a sudden we took the restrictions off here and said Snowe-Jeffords is unconstitutional, that is what the courts decided would happen. This is what, potentially, might happen if our amendment does not happen.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.9812614881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0470678118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0253972306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0155129179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0052019146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0045504145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003575804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.65677E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.32616E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.49247E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.55865E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Bill Frist
Again, this side of the chart is basically the same as McCain- Feingold. We have eliminated the party. As I have said, if you take the restriction on speech, the Snowe-Jeffords restriction on speech, off, the money is going to still come into the system and it can't go this way. It can't go to individual candidates because we have limits there, the hard money limits. It has nowhere to go but to flow to the area of least resistance, and the area of least resistance is corporations, unions, issue groups that all of a sudden have unregulated, no-limits, no-caps -- for good constitutional reasons, I argue -- and you can see the dollar signs. Ultimately, we do exactly what we don't want to do. We increase the interest and the role and the power of the special interests versus the individual candidates and the parties.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.23639
VADER
0.95
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0672345748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0574015372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0466341502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0173781445
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0058459329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030311168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003555225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001668006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001031078
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.2644E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.03493E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
34
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Bill Frist
That is the impact. That is the big picture. I think that linkage is critically important.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1062433934
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0105956176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008822756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008547275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003886212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000301566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001673959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.89254E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.46186E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.3612E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6332E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.5
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Bill Frist
As to the specifics of the amendment, first of all, it addresses this balance. Second, it is narrow, it is targeted, and it is focused. The media has been saying this is a poison pill because if you strike down one part of McCain-Feingold the whole bill falls. That is wrong. That is false. This is narrow and targeted. It does not apply to the whole bill. It links just the two provisions, the Snowe-Jeffords provision with the ban on soft money -- nothing else. The linkage is for a good reason. It is because the impact on one has an impact on the other. They are complementary; they are intertwined. That is why that nonseverability is absolutely critical to prevent the possibility of this happening.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.45199
VADER
-0.596
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
1.3435653411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.08790227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0404119957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0387572771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028747028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016804599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003345414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001247761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.69503E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.3206E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.78951E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.5
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
10
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
4.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Bill Frist
The nonseverability clause ties together just those two provisions and nothing else. When I say it is narrowly tailored, a narrowly tailored nonseverability clause, it is basically because everything else will stand. If the Snowe-Jeffords provision is ruled to be unconstitutional and therefore the cap is released, the party soft money elimination will be invalid; again, coming back to the original balance. Other provisions in the bill stand. It is just those two. The other provisions, which will not be affected by this nonseverability clause, are provisions such as the increased disclosure for party committees, the provision clarifying that the ban on foreign contributions includes soft money, the clarification of the ban on raising political money on Federal Government property. All of that stands. We are talking about just these two provisions to which I have spoken.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.02165
VADER
0.196
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1603167038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0054243363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025797466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014209484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0010192008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0005565787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003842237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001895111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001137348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.60822E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4487E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
46
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
Bill Frist
The provisions on independent versus coordinated expenditures by political parties are unaffected by this amendment. The coordination provisions of the bill, the portions of the bill such as tightening the definition of independent expenditures, the provisions providing increased reporting of independent expenditures -- again, all of these provisions of the McCain-Feingold bill are not excluded as a part of our amendment today. It has to be one of the two provisions to which I have spoken.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.638
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.52899893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.010586447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0020458601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014719836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012271416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000376941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.1897E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.16052E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.9106E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.623E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.039E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Bill Frist
Another point I want to mention, and it will probably be talked about over the next couple of hours, is the fact that this narrowly targeted nonseverability clause also provides a process for expedited judicial review of any court challenges to these two provisions. The purpose of that clearly is that challenges -- we don't want to be held up in court with a lot of indecision over the years.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
0.404
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1301981276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0450150808
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0117045616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0087769673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040259711
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026070582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010189763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003489987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000134094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001148759
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.1404E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Bill Frist
All this does, as part of this nonseverability clause, its purpose, is to provide that if the provisions of this legislation that restrict the ever-louder voice of the issue ads -- which, again, are poorly disclosed and poorly regulated -- are declared unconstitutional, just the Snowe-Jeffords provisions, then the provision that weakens the voice of the individual candidate and of the party would not be enforceable.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.5896670278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0702760881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0504518393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0060940816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002633706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020467658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013463226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000211109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001240616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.68608E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.4681E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Bill Frist
Simply put, sort of boiling it down: The person running for public office will not be left out here defenseless, without any voice, if our effort in McCain-Feingold as the Snowe-Jeffords provision falls, if the courts say no, we are going to take this cap off here -- which clearly, just looking at the dollar signs, would put the individual candidates again at a point where they are almost helpless as they are trying to make their point.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.61904
VADER
-0.563
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0684698694
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0338757643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.006244691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022684853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017860613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008426873
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001702633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.90309E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.79888E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.03355E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.4872E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Bill Frist
The history of severability legislation I am sure we will go to. I will not address that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0990988803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0205568867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047565161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014176633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012559473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010049137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009968415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001658669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001255927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.7314E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.10602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
2.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Bill Frist
Let me answer one question because we were talking as if this were a poison pill because people bring in editorials saying this is a poison pill. It is clear, a poison pill, to me, is if you give somebody a pill and they drop dead and they are gone. We are not adding a new entity or provision to the bill. All we are doing is linking two provisions that are already in the bill. They are in the underlying McCain-Feingold bill. They are not amendments that have been added that are trying to poison the bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.63636
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.63636
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.335
VADER
-0.896
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0485572178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0214661457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019850284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007719389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001365626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.89079E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.16999E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.73905E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.31519E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.12182E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6582E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Bill Frist
The only thing we are doing is working with two underlying provisions that are already in the bill, saying they are inextricably linked and have an impact one on the other.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0281655462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0126500876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019922863
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018481871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001053137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003871187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001766165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001157317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.45846E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.5093E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8184E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.8
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Bill Frist
Proponents of the bill -- we heard it a lot this morning -- told us time and time again that this is constitutional, Snowe-Jeffords is constitutional, the ban on party soft money is constitutional. If people really believe that, I think proponents of the bill have nothing to fear by this linkage in our nonseverability proposal.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.066
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.618672464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2526348457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0210109938
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.006757259
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0064362124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0042689135
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025083024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0010249712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001901755
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001734341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.07465E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Bill Frist
As we look at what I have presented, we should take this opportunity to look realistically at what is happening in campaigns and campaign finance reform: The sources of money, how it is being spent, whether or not it is disclosed, and where the money is going. In all this we need to make absolutely sure we do not muffle the voices and diminish that role of the individual candidates out there while increasing the role of the special interests or the unions or the corporations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.74
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1271959976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1167448936
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0766369456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0170222789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0050279094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0027485317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002460842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0023144023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000203637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.73795E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.34372E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Bill Frist
I hope all my colleagues will study this particular amendment, will carefully consider this balanced and narrowly tailored amendment that addresses what I believe is a critical, critical issue.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.052
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.1139392843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0459889212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0131556488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0107080174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049126895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002643371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011131168
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004984221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002608463
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.24058E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.972E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, I yield 15 minutes to the senior Senator from Tennessee.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.2627333393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0519374153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0371482805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0335861871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0024761484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024137022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017616294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.6101E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.45395E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.47644E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.0663E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.8
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
3.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0757160538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0367567322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.013263103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0068210487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0037056081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013032968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003963745
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002767051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001941109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.87211E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.4691E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.6
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Fred Thompson
Mr. President, I thank my colleague from Tennessee, Senator Frist, who has done his usual excellent job in laying out his case. I think the concern that is being expressed is a valid concern, in that we need to keep in mind the totality of the system as we are addressing this issue. That is one of the things that makes me feel good about what happened yesterday, because I think that is exactly what we were doing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.695772795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0343600725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0298641302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0288454321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033782391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002275182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001661098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.34439E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.4077E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6607E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.2419E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Fred Thompson
If we, for example, had lost Snowe-Jeffords somewhere along the way and just had a soft money ban without any increases in the hard money limit, I think the potential problem that my colleague expressed would really have been a significant one. I do not think that practical problem exists nearly as much as we feared, because even under a worst case scenario, if the disclosure and other provisions of the Snowe- Jeffords even were to fall and we lost soft money in the system -- which I think would be a good happening -- we have increases in the hard money limit. We have now doubled, under the original bill -- we have doubled the amount of money the candidate can have for his own campaign, $1,000 to $2,000; $4,000 in a primary, $4,000 in a general election. We have also increased the amount of money that can go to parties.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.83321
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.05882
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.05882
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.11123
VADER
-0.891
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0979513978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0755403133
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0210108541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0071866503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0036144032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016540049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003055007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001867483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001236344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001118306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.73314E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
32
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Fred Thompson
We did not increase it as much as I would like, but we increased it. We also increased the aggregate amount. We also increased and doubled the amount that parties can give to the candidates. We indexed all of it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.901
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.050353905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0389569876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0109624343
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0100771838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019911142
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012404467
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012193281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003043927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000270238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.47121E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.87806E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Fred Thompson
It is not that we are not in the same position we were when McCain- Feingold started. We have taken some significant steps in order to get some legitimate, controlled, limited, hard money into the hands of candidates and into the hands of parties that they didn't have when this debate began.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0248620927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0080300066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048555685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014115009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009013584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006228783
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005347664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001503565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.72697E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.94308E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0458E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Fred Thompson
The problem that is being addressed today is one of the very kinds of things we were trying to address yesterday. I think this body effectively and overwhelmingly addressed it in the compromise amendment that we have. The proponents of the current amendment for nonseverability, however, make the case that we shouldn't risk the situation where the soft money limitations or abolitions and the Snowe- Jeffords requirements with regard to unions, corporations, and others would be struck down; that there would be an imbalance. My first point is that we corrected and I think significantly corrected that imbalance yesterday.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
-0.596
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0729988329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0178847098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0092558723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012729231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009505485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004155854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002837523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001156107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.79668E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.856E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0562E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39
Gunning-Fog Score
18.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Fred Thompson
My second point would be that it is not exactly as if Snowe-Jeffords were some kind of a major happening in terms of the overall picture of any given campaign. In the first place, none of it kicks in 60 days before an election. So anything goes up until 60 days. Part of Snowe- Jeffords is simply a disclosure requirement. It doesn't have anything to do with money. A part of Snowe-Jeffords has to do with corporations and unions within the last 60 days and their expenditures, and that is a money situation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.012449229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0102047416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0091366965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0082732717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008795143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007553065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003087391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.55767E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.4469E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.358E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.68E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Fred Thompson
Let's say that was knocked out, hypothetically. We are all talking hypothetically because obviously none of us knows what a court will do. We have argued the constitutionality of Snowe-Jeffords in the past. For the moment, let's hypothetically say that a 60-day restriction with regard to what corporations and unions could do, and nobody else -- no individuals, as Senator Wellstone pointed out, for example -- is a part of this. I compliment my friend for narrowly tailoring this legislation so we didn't have to deal with all of that. But that is knocked out.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.16667
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.16667
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.31015
VADER
-0.382
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0570917502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047967602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0039683033
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016071632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004468195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002572298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001357261
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.58602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.98692E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.1358E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.69E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51
Gunning-Fog Score
12.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Fred Thompson
Then we are knocking out some corporate and union money in the last 60 days of the campaign. That is not insignificant. But I am not sure, in the total context of things, that it is all that important. It certainly doesn't justify doing what we may be doing here in terms of nonseverability.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.499
Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0205507517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0109925189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0036194117
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001313754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008646963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006900274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004293323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001216066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.06456E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.04836E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.6733E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Fred Thompson
The first thing we need to understand about nonseverability and Congress passing a bill with a nonseverability provision in this is that it is extremely rare. It is rarely done. We asked the Congressional Research Service about it. Their information is that there have been 10 bills introduced or considered in the last 12 years that have had a nonseverability provision in them. They further say that there has only been one bill in the last 12 years where we have passed legislation that contained a nonseverability clause. It is extremely rare in the thousands of bills that passed during that period of time of 12 years. I said: How many public laws were there? They said 12,962. Out of 12,962 pieces of legislation, only 1 of them contained a nonseverability clause.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0473978085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0140748802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0067168359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0034783865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026379419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002151779
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.13694E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.11017E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.1457E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7666E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7225E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
11.1
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Fred Thompson
That is some indication of the rarity and the significance of what we are doing here today, or what is being suggested that we do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.03003038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0129931053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0104599123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0024510196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004198459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001550227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001110557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
7.48843E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.62913E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.3837E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3613E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.3
Gunning-Fog Score
16.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Fred Thompson
There was a principle established a long time ago in this country that is honored by Congress and is recognized by the judiciary -- that in a piece of legislation, which more likely than not will contain several provisions, you can have some parts of it that are constitutional and maybe one part that is not. Strike the unconstitutional part, says the Court, and leave the rest intact.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.675
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2070528222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.026918255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0201708201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0142826131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034270059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007499778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006122585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003840567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.009E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.1068E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4372E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44
Gunning-Fog Score
18.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Fred Thompson
That is the normal way we have handled things in this country. It is based upon a concept that I think all of us honor and adhere and we talk a lot about. That is the concept of judicial restraint. We have recognized in this country for a long time -- and our courts have recognized for a long time -- that they should exercise judicial restraint and make constitutional rulings only when necessary. The courts have adopted their own rulings that militate in that direction and cause them not to go off and even consider constitutional issues unless they really have to. It is for the reasons that I explained: Because of the concept of restraint and the benefit we get as a country and that the judiciary gets for adopting judicial restraint, not reaching out to take on more than it should and look for opportunities to strike down laws when they are not even really directly presented to them, and so forth.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.794
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1276737195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0283202942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0067784793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0064589309
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013149485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012682204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007291865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.00364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.29868E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.16846E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.93626E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Fred Thompson
I think the Court said it very well in the case of Regan v. Time, Inc., with the Supreme Court plurality decision in 1984. This is a little long, but I think it is important because it gets to the heart of what I am saying.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.9
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0562392757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0529424753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0396362244
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0096162177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0043941433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001450354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.68015E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.85318E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3639E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.2068E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.0936E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.5
Gunning-Fog Score
7.2
Coleman-Liau Index
5.6
SMOG Index
8.2
Automated Readability Index
1.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Fred Thompson
The Court said:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.091187231
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0422305748
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0240819601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0074383373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0031009276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000143867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001040628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.74744E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.73946E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.933E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.526E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Fred Thompson
I think that states it very well. In summary, I think it has been the law and the practice of the United States for many years. It is a valid one. I think we would all agree that it is a valid one.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.769
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2601979766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0102101047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011300722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009861456
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004082043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002286844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.52549E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.39712E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.0876E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8559E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0723E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91.6
Gunning-Fog Score
5.2
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
0.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Fred Thompson
Those are the circumstances. No. 1, the extreme rarity of the situation; No. 2, these longstanding principles that our judiciary has. Those are the foundation blocks as we approach this issue this time as a Congress.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
-0.649
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1742228051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0054012224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0044265234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003185746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0021539292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000829842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003133204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.32828E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.48485E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2497E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.1521E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
4.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Fred Thompson
What will be the legal effects of a nonseverability clause? Not only has Congress not legislated a nonseverability clause once in the last 12 years, but there are no cases ever in the history of the country where Federal courts have been called upon to construe a nonseverability clause.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
-0.372
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.046951414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0236877473
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0203425225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0185644254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001600171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002896497
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.65807E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.25759E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.34132E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4866E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0426E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Fred Thompson
We really are in uncharted waters here in terms of how such a clause might be interpreted. I fear we are getting into an area of unknown consequences, and potential perversive results that we don't fully appreciate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.783
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0530077377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0037848265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030740895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011864572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009209592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009052866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003859925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001222127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.5428E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.481E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.109E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.3
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Fred Thompson
What will be the probable result? As you think it through, you can see situations very readily that are going to produce perplexities, shall we say, that maybe we can resolve here on the floor -- I don't know -- and determine what intent the proponents have with regard to this amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1751322648
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1258472214
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0738433795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0121900077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042304662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001319043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002711718
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.89351E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.77419E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.0254E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1972E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.9
Gunning-Fog Score
15.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Fred Thompson
Article III of our Constitution says there must be a case in controversy before a person can bring a lawsuit, have it upheld. Any law professors out there, forgive me for my shorthand as I go through this. I want to touch on the general principles, and I hope I get them right.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.477
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0592528377
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0568785414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0135739218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0052748768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018158853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017987019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001442964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.68308E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.3086E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.69764E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.9892E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Fred Thompson
If you are a litigant, someone challenging this act, you have to have standing. There is a criminal aspect to this statute; if you are a criminal and you are convicted, you have standing. As far as the civil aspects of it are concerned, in any kind of a situation, you have to have a case in controversy, and you have to have standing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.70805
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16705
VADER
-0.735
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0380730751
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.010622952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013779247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.00119735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006177446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004775047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001507384
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001226712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001055147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.6453E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.48225E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Fred Thompson
That means you have to be injured directly by the provision you are dealing with or have been convicted of. If the statute is in force, you will be injured, if you sustained injury or you face imminent injury, something like that, not just a general public kind of a potential injury. There was a case back in 1974 where some concerned citizens got together and sued the CIA because they were not disclosing their budget. The courts held that your interests are not any different from any other citizen. You have no standing in this lawsuit.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.94444
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.26826
VADER
-0.918
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0089155285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0081707272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.004357925
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0026969612
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026492662
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0017986915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001600983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012109845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004447131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001171019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4202E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Fred Thompson
That little background has relevance because someone challenging these two provisions will refer to them as the soft money provision and the Snowe-Jeffords provision of the McCain-Feingold bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.153
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1117198146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0539107248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0185678247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0166676138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.010806007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0091499322
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0078373138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0063685708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0020317793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004567002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003233457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0727295585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0259117485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0257375243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0207974881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002936646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023918492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0013181112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0012623224
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003864186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001219523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.48455E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.2
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Fred Thompson
I request an additional 10 minutes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0733300578
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0633450458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0316602876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.010090357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0026259968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023121058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007240386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006695002
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002250141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001475374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.41549E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.7
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, I yield an additional 10 minutes to the Senator from Tennessee.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.3892935812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1790686627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1788904658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0405401574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0201174043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0092316222
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0039093207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023461918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004355438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003877302
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.9995E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.6
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.6548152771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0650368223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0482747157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0217983979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010238594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008988415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003544993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.48196E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.80716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.48556E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.226E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
6.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Fred Thompson
It has to do with how the cases would come up. If someone, let's say, was convicted under the soft money provision -- in other words, somebody sent some soft money to somebody they weren't supposed to after this law was passed, and they got caught doing that and they got charged with and got convicted of it, if you had severability, then that person would clearly have standing with regard to the soft money provision they were convicted of. That is all that would be at issue.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0795965781
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0347619585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0311668031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0177053647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0054415006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028182829
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004114271
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003668818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001796274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001704364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001132061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Fred Thompson
Presumably, if you had nonseverability the way that the proponents of this amendment would suggest, that person who is affected by the soft money provision that he is convicted of, presumably he could also challenge the Snowe-Jeffords part of the bill that has no relevance to him. If so, are we telling the Court, by means of this amendment, to give standing to this person to challenge Snowe-Jeffords when they are not affected by Snowe-Jeffords? If so, we are running afoul of article III because the Congress cannot give people substantive jurisdiction or grant constitutional standing for anyone such as that. If we were trying to do that, we certainly would not be exercising judicial restraint.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.38462
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.74721
VADER
0.436
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0721516961
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0185482175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0118369266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0076807424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0039067007
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026211454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003305975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001682431
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001414113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001266381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.32201E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.9
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
35
Sprache Difficult Word Count
31
Fred Thompson
During the course of this debate, I hope we can agree on what we are trying to do by means of this amendment. Do we want to be able to allow someone who is affected by one provision to be able to challenge the other provision? That is the question. If the answer to that is, yes, then we can talk about the constitutional implications of that. If the answer to that is, no, that they can only challenge the provision they are affected by, then what about a fellow who is convicted under the soft money provisions, which is held to be constitutional? He goes to jail. Another person comes along, he is sued under the Snowe-Jeffords provision. That is held to be unconstitutional, which wipes out the entire legislation, under this amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.1431
VADER
0.607
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0723820296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0425822655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0147256433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0095240284
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022946602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002142233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.8615E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.30847E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.5473E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.498E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.086E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
11.6
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Fred Thompson
So you have the first individual sitting in jail for a period of time under an act that has been declared unconstitutional. Is that what we desire to do?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0828708289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0457186485
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0413626491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0114612805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0100669356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0021633678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014588346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012626173
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005834758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001080027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.78242E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Fred Thompson
It is not as easy as it seems. That is one of the reasons Congress has never passed such a law as is being suggested that would allow this particular result. There has never been a Federal case on this subject. There have been a few lower court Federal cases deciding State law. Surprisingly, in some of those cases, in interpreting nonseverability provisions, they have ignored them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
-0.24
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.2701109275
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0953033101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.026692744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0184543329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009445523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0070799841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0031552514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004669664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000215198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001607015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0987E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.7
Gunning-Fog Score
9.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Fred Thompson
I say to my friends, even if this nonseverability provision passes, which I hope it does not, there is a good chance the Court would ignore it. And, if not a good chance, depending on how it is interpreted as to what Congress' intent is, that it will be declared unconstitutional.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.476
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0376642914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0103085207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0093681112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0076070843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0026826143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014405208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007597465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001758432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001266634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.37029E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.585E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Fred Thompson
For reasons set forth in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, a 1992 Supreme Court case, the Court made this statement:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0734418572
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0175507274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.009379776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013668758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000945053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004307653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003098698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001081148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0573E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.2602E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.213E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
4.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Fred Thompson
In other words, Congress, you can't tell us what is a case in controversy. You can't tell us that there is a case in controversy out there or that a person has standing in a case when he really doesn't. That is for us to decide. If you are attempting to intrude, you are violating the doctrine of separation of powers.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Sexual
0.0098134107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0041382882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025053692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0009324871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006128877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004078257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001185134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.37784E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.75751E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.3024E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8015E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Fred Thompson
I hope my colleagues will not view this amendment favorably. It would be not only a reflection on us, but it wouldn't do the judiciary any good. We are in danger, if we pass this amendment, in one fell swoop, of doing something that would be hurtful to two branches of our Government: the legislative branch and the judicial branch -- the legislative branch, us, because after all these years, after 25 years we finally get around to addressing this issue, after going through and agreeing or disagreeing, but let's say agreeing on some fundamental principles that we believe ought to be passed, at the same time, in some cases supporting amendments which, in my estimation, pretty clearly have constitutional problems. I don't think that reflects well on us in what we ought to be doing and how we ought to be doing it. It doesn't reflect well on us when we threaten judicial independence or judicial restraint.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.16705
VADER
0.683
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0302393659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0180204544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0064041436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0059647973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0043554737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0038938426
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0016446353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.00021962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001305465
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.15931E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.5423E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
34
Fred Thompson
There are some broader principles involved. Those principles are involved here. So while I appreciate the concern that has been expressed in terms of balance, in terms of the need for balance -- and we saw part of that yesterday -- the portion of Snowe-Jeffords that deals with money is a fairly limited segment: Never done this before; treading in uncharted waters; trying to accomplish things we probably cannot, in the end, do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.36772
VADER
0.597
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0280767999
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0248895551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0171917389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0155662317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0093972973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0052778956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025552596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010045008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005283155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001047262
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.24345E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Fred Thompson
For all those reasons, I will respectfully urge defeat of the amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0334705866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0270607357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0176087429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0069778682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0041548454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020773499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009006614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001551276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.13786E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.6494E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.45E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.006570424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.003444601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0009047627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000349651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002993653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.72408E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.94629E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.8079E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.303E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.737E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.23E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Bill Frist
Mr. President, I will turn to my colleague from Utah in a minute. First, I will take a moment to respond on our time to at least two of the comments made. It will take just a second.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.8596662432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.2353156684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0396798336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0185256649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030323077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028261986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0027055494
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005215672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000150008
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001298356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.48893E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
94.8
Gunning-Fog Score
3.8
Coleman-Liau Index
5.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Bill Frist
I appreciate the comments that have been made. The first statement made was about the relative importance of the Snowe-Jeffords amendment. I think it is important because my whole argument is based on this balance of the linkage, the tie between the two. How important is Snowe-Jeffords -- the significance of not being able to go on the air 60 days prior to an election. We should not underestimate that because, really, it is the balance between giving the candidate voice and the special interest voice.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.931
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2268739976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1747896429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1545362524
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0292567565
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0197905872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0086864333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035358138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009972789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002823704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001111771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001024538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Bill Frist
Our whole argument is if you are going to take voice away from one, you ought to take voice away from the other. If you are going to give one voice, give the other voice. I point out that Snowe-Jeffords is very important, and that is why we are targeting it in this narrowly targeted amendment. If you just look at special interests, which is in red on this chart, versus party ads, the issue ads, I think, disturb a lot of people. I can't say that all of these ads were in the last 60 days, but anybody who has watched campaigns knows it is really in the last 2 weeks of most of these campaigns, not 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks. The Snowe-Jeffords provision is 60 days. This is just to show that Snowe-Jeffords is critically important, and if we disrupt Snowe- Jeffords, get rid of that limitation on free speech, there will be an infusion of money even greater than today. The special interest ads -- again, the ads that Snowe-Jeffords is directed at -- amounted to about $347 million in the campaigns we just finished.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.125
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.125
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.23639
VADER
0.95
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4286316689
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.3903827164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0175519177
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0165756734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049741946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032346416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0031138628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008791453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002626686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7013E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.42361E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.8
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
32
Bill Frist
The party ad money, which is predominantly soft money, non-Federal money, was only $162 million. What we are basically saying is that if you are going to take off the restriction of Snowe-Jeffords and you are going to allow this money to come flowing into the system, the least we can do for the candidate out there is to allow the party to participate without unilaterally being challenged and overrun by special interests. So Snowe-Jeffords is critical.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
0.809
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.2130422974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0473990513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0184372911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0134317263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0125325809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007609937
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002842883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.05431E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.019E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.0131E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.0655E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Bill Frist
No. 2 -- and other people will comment on this -- nonseverability may be rare, I guess, in the big scheme of things, but it has been done a lot -- in fact, three times on campaign finance reform, where you do bring people together and you have this rich interaction. Three times we voted for nonseverability clauses on this floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
-0.153
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0621442567
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0466798869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0190693114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0059149574
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0048898102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0014132735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003690051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003476196
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002467737
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.54612E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.21035E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.1
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
8.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Mitch McConnell
Will the Senator yield for an observation?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.147350796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1205311157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0393054739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.011604996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002745323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006233495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000582675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001227371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.66347E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.02988E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.1858E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Bill Frist
Yes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0230183869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0195636821
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0071641931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016075632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011816424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0011074162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002581021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.11348E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.77923E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.42728E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.339E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Mitch McConnell
Not only is the Senator correct that the last three campaign finance reform bills that cleared the Senate had nonseverability clauses in them, the amendment we voted on a few moments ago -- the Harkin amendment, which was supported by 31 colleagues on the other side of the aisle -- had a nonseverability clause in it. In fact, the Senator from Tennessee is entirely correct.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0857829174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0069775888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0044757537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0033446067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032104927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015472891
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004078856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002511721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001921277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001703138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.28863E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
36.5
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Mitch McConnell
When the subject turns to the first amendment and to the constitutional rights of Americans in these kinds of bills, it is the exception not to have a nonseverability clause in it. I am sure the other Senator from Tennessee was not suggesting that nobody would have standing to bring a case affecting so many different people's constitutional rights. I am confident, I say to my friend, the junior Senator from Tennessee, there will be some Americans who will have a standing to bring a suit against this case. I will be leading them. I thank the Senator from Tennessee.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.881
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.3744790563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0464822806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0252842787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0121496232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.001095772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009417977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.55206E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.421E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.43441E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.76445E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.0481E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Bill Frist
I thank the distinguished Senator from Kentucky for his comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0270245597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.010204596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0061605409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021210944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001428248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008921513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004748423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.22915E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.9821E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9668E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.807E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Bill Frist
I yield 15 minutes to the Senator from Utah.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0496240973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0112967558
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0104284503
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0062849693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0042451156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022150602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0021486872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006975063
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.01481E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.226E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.3944E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.9
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
5.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0411071058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0118253964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0079961559
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072686678
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0028290353
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000605826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001507972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001457068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.25632E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.71807E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.72137E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Bob Bennett
Mr. President, I was interested to hear Senator Thompson say we are in uncharted waters, facing unknown results that we don't fully appreciate. That is the theme of my comments.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.279
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0975315983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0239867702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0197269095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015547646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006439234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004205163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000349361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001078045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.44201E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.93125E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.2227E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
5.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Bob Bennett
I go back to another philosopher, Mark Twain. I can't quote him exactly, but he has been quoted as saying something to the effect that "prophecy is a very iffy profession, particularly with respect to the future." That is where we are. We are all trying to divine what is going to happen in the future if McCain-Feingold passes, as I expect it will, and if it should be signed and upheld by the Supreme Court. What would we face?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.947
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2835486084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0283374451
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0220985909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039306771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016560884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008117227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000517611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002365095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.0728E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.03183E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.347E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.3
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Bob Bennett
Well, I read in the popular press that on the Democratic side, one of their leading campaign attorneys is telling them if McCain-Feingold passes, the Democrats can kiss goodbye any chance of gaining control in the Senate in the 2002 election. That should cause everybody on this side of the aisle to stampede and vote for it. However, there is an equally qualified observer who has spoken to our Members and has said if McCain-Feingold passes, the Republican Party will go into the minority and stay there for 25 years.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.886
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0593461504
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0133003254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0095524432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009534047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007165389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002993633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001274881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001121684
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.3766E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.81986E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.4054E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.7
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Bob Bennett
Now, obviously, one or the other of these has to be wrong in terms of what is going to happen at the election. But neither one of these observers is an unqualified observer. The reason they have come to these two differing conclusions is that each one is looking at this issue through the prism of his own self-interest. If the Democratic campaign lawyer sees the destruction of the Democratic Party and the Republican campaign consultant sees the destruction of the Republican Party, I submit to you, as murky as our crystal ball may be, the chances are that they are both right -- that we are going to see, as a result of the passage of this bill, not the destruction of the party -- I won't go to that extent, but certainly a dramatic diminution of party influence in politics in this country.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.739
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1790921087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0235367537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0081709928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032008935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009375993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004134591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004075236
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.93711E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.12609E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.31041E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.1174E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
43.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
31
Sprache Difficult Word Count
33
Bob Bennett
One very practical example that we can expect is the scaling down, if not the elimination, of party conventions because party conventions now are financed entirely with soft money which, under this bill, would become illegal. So we may see party conventions disappear altogether, or we may see them become very truncated affairs, which the media may decide is not worth covering. This would be good news for an incumbent President. This would be bad news for a challenger trying to prevent a President from seeking a second term. He would be denied the opportunity of exposure that comes from a party convention.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.66667
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.29928
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.20067
VADER
0.604
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0667344953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0289573305
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0085487256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028614731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015415701
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000363585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00030482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001389338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000113884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.20442E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.37169E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Bob Bennett
One of the things we will not see as a result of the passage of McCain-Feingold is the elimination of corruption in politics. Corruption comes from the heart of the receiver, not the wallet of the giver. If an individual is corrupt, he is going to stay corrupt, whether or not the "speech police" are watching him. He is going to find some way to remain corrupt and to game the system to his advantage. The person of integrity is going to remain a person of integrity, regardless of how many people come waving bills at him to try to get him to change his position solely on the basis of money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.11111
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.20067
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.05263
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.05263
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.10008
VADER
0.915
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.075742323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0654153991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0056250639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0022166874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.002200967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011316371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.99007E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.73263E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.9444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.4901E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0639E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
Bob Bennett
Integrity and corruption does not come as a result of participation in the political process. Integrity and corruption come from the way you were raised, from the way you make your decisions, from the hard commitments you make along the way in life.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.649
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0372410927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0046399691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032991229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0029751287
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005599627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004170521
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001041607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.77073E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.3961E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.6897E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.0988E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Bob Bennett
There are corrupt people in entertainment and there are people of integrity in entertainment. There are corrupt people in the media and there are people of integrity in the media. There are corrupt people in politics and there are people of integrity in politics, and they will not change on either side just because we pass a bill. So that is the one prediction of which I can be confident. On these others, we are guessing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.939
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2048303373
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.016558975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0148757041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0040984141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011227655
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007434365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.00025186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001696579
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.79309E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.3907E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.7884E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.3
Gunning-Fog Score
11.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Bob Bennett
I let my imagination run. If the political conventions disappear or become seriously truncated as a result of the passage of this bill, and if I were a special interest group with an unlimited wallet, I would anticipate holding a major convention of my own and invite certain favored speakers. I would gear it in such a way as to get maximum media attention, and those speakers could then get media attention that would come out of attending that convention.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.823
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.3738217987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.3255708143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0324605382
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0230455946
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0092587412
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040681385
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0025329316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0019478588
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003485976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.28813E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.7808E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Bob Bennett
I do believe that we are going to see an increase in political spending of soft dollars on the part of special interest groups in different and inventive ways that we at the moment cannot anticipate. Once again, in the newspaper there is a story of a fundraiser. He signed it himself. He said: Those of us on K Street are already figuring out ways to get around McCain-Feingold and use our soft dollars in a fashion to influence the political situation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.791
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1727745519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0244614988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0109091787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0067695073
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0029626372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002588194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000862101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002916056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001196904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.62396E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.27006E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Bob Bennett
We are going to see, I am sure, an increase in Harry and Louise kind of advertising. Those of us who were on the floor through the debate on President Clinton's health care plan know how powerful those soft dollars were. We know how many those soft dollars were, and we know how totally outside the ambit of McCain-Feingold those soft dollars were. If McCain-Feingold says you cannot give those soft dollars to a party to pay its light bill, well, OK, we will give the soft dollars to Madison Avenue to influence politics in other ways.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.48808
VADER
0.943
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.9138365276
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.4130993038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0310249423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0294966652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0244492112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.012314161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0080849051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0060631108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0051533883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0045169596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005275507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Bob Bennett
One of the other ways the parties are going to be seriously disadvantaged by this bill is in candidate recruitment. Senator Frist is the chairman of the Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee. When he goes out and tries to convince a reluctant candidate to challenge a Democratic incumbent, one of the first things that candidate says is: If I do this, will you be there for me? Senator Frist can say now: Yes, we will commit X amount of activity in your behalf. Please, come do this. Do this for the party. Do this for your country. Come do it, and we will be behind you.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.818
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1089329948
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0283977832
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0081547238
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0057284913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0026184598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002265826
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002881212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002300274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.56015E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.04447E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.1868E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.4
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
11.1
Automated Readability Index
5.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Bob Bennett
Senator McConnell has already laid out the financial implications of McCain-Feingold in terms of the amount of money that would be available to the senatorial committee if we had nothing but hard dollars based on actual experience. As Senator Frist goes out to recruit candidates, or as Senator Murray goes out to recruit candidates on the other side, she is going to find her ability to attract candidates into this situation will be severely reduced.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.335
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Harassment
1.5421179123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.5126768257
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.123391836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039869963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008155132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003683968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000172295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001451357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001392725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001061197
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.17542E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Bob Bennett
The ultimate answer is: We want you to run, but when it comes to financial support, you are on your own; you are not going to get any significant help from the national party in any way because we simply cannot do it. We have to use our hard dollars for things for which we used to use soft money. We simply are not going to have the resources that we would like to have to help you. We will see many outstanding candidates decide they do not want to run under those circumstances.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.625
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.34993
VADER
0.977
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.2529336372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1187422429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0437395909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0092839291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0052489795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0032439741
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005783249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000156547
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001562107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.38369E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.19022E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.7
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Bob Bennett
Make no mistake about it, those in the press gallery who have been talking about the present system being an incumbent protection act, wait until we pass McCain-Feingold and I guarantee you an incumbent will really have to foul his nest in order to lose. This virtually guarantees that no challenger of any consequence will be able to raise the money and produce the organization to take on an entrenched incumbent because the restrictions are so severe that they will not be able to do that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.718
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.011129093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0071977127
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005047736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025938967
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0011158186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007778864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005249164
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001315113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.62501E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.1322E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7154E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Bob Bennett
What does this have to do with the amendment? Simply this: At least as a result of the Wellstone amendment for which I voted, there is a degree of equal damage to the special interest groups. With the Wellstone amendment in the bill, the bill does not unilaterally damage parties and leave special interest groups totally free. Oh, it does leave special interest groups huge loopholes, but it at least, on the advertising phase, says the special interest groups have the same kinds of problems as the parties.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.95
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0124523984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0093574068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016464039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015835645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012120993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000736969
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.40627E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.15789E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.77E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.117E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.27E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.5
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Bob Bennett
People said to me: Why in the world did you vote for the Wellstone amendment when it is clearly unconstitutional? I voted for it with my eyes wide open. I believe it is unconstitutional. I believe the other parts of the bill that it seeks equality for are equally unconstitutional. But I thought if the time should come, through some dark miracle, that McCain-Feingold survives the White House, the Supreme Court, and gets into the public stream, I do not want the loophole that the Wellstone amendment closed to stay open. If they are going to find some of it unconstitutional, I want them to find all of it unconstitutional. I want that loophole plugged.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.891
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1299709082
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0110154884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0080541715
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014679658
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010115616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008334824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000112788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.43231E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.31555E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57084E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.17488E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
10.1
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Bob Bennett
If, indeed, we have the circumstance before the Court where the Court says the Wellstone amendment is unconstitutional, so the special interest groups are off the hook, but all of the corresponding pressures on parties are constitutional so that parties are under this kind of restriction, we are going to see a distortion in the political world that none of us is going to like.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.038
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0132161396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0043048192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034741399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014710869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005381989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.01896E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
4.5313E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.04337E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.41479E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.9874E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.45E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Bob Bennett
I am supporting this amendment that says if the Supreme Court says, OK, we are going to strike down the Wellstone amendment as unconstitutional, as I hope they do, then we are going to strike down all the rest of it as unconstitutional because it all goes together, it fits together; it is a legitimate pattern.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.884
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0944730709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0131386492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0042580454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034443281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011535064
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003713498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001949793
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001148707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.58056E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.4237E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.41E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Bob Bennett
I happen to think it is a total pattern of the violation of the first amendment. I have said before I think if James Madison were alive, he would be appalled at the debate, let alone the outcome. I have been ridiculed for that by members of the press who somehow think it is kind of funny to talk about the Founding Fathers, but I still believe the Federalist Papers are the best guide we can have as to how we make public policies around here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.16705
VADER
0.537
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.091930927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0558758911
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0373165763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0193668937
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0103684608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.008385862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.008123515
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032315893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009562695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003457766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001871156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Bob Bennett
As we look into our crystal balls, murky as they may be, we have to try to understand what the consequences will be if this bill passes and becomes law. I think the consequences are as I have stated: Parties will be seriously disadvantaged, special interest groups will be advantaged. But I do not want that to be done by the Supreme Court. I want the Supreme Court to tell us, all or nothing.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.93
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0249706791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0164361671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0055073619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028330956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005944415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002629243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001101414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.49926E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.16027E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.5001E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.17E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Bob Bennett
If the Supreme Court says an intrusion on first amendment rights is legitimate when you are dealing with political parties, then that intrusion ought to be legitimate when you are dealing with special interest groups. If, on the other hand, they say, no, the first amendment is so precious that we are going to leave it alone as far as special interest groups are concerned, why should they not then be required to say, we will leave it alone with respect to political parties?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.964
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0982685131
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0345124019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0041194875
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009448988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005751858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.90996E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.48043E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.0227E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.1107E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.4466E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.38E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Bob Bennett
Since when did the Constitution make a difference between the way people assemble themselves in their right of assembly and their right to petition and say: If you assemble yourselves in your right of assembly and right to petition in a political party, we are going to treat you one way, but if you assemble yourselves in your right to assemble and right to petition in a special interest group, we are going to treat you a different way?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.93
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0165097881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0132301866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0119309479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0005797379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004147837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002146667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001036962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
1.57827E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.249E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.8972E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.613E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
2.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Bob Bennett
The possibility exists that might happen if this amendment is adopted. If this amendment is adopted, then the Supreme Court will have to make the fundamental decision: Are they going to amend the first amendment by upholding McCain-Feingold, or are they not?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
1.819148846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2769398037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1189892995
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0183761615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033022519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020058505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018762337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007091453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001651226
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001330989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001173126
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Bob Bennett
If they decide they are not, then they are not across the board. They cannot do it selectively. To me, that is the kind of outcome with which Hamilton, Madison, and John Jay would all agree. I make no apologies for calling them to this argument because I think this argument fundamentally is about the preservation of their handiwork which all of us in this Chamber have taken an oath to uphold and defend.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.077
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0398620061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0201766481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0082081817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0031517509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012871589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002870229
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.00418E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.18651E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7249E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.1363E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.912E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Bob Bennett
I do not take that oath lightly. I know my fellow Senators do not take that oath lightly. We should talk about it in those terms. I plead with my colleagues to think in those terms and, therefore, to support this amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0964521023
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0314589706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0162158642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0064513108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022669001
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010901362
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009192087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.05976E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.97645E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.06816E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0432E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.4
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0995190116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0223265393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0175499081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0076005221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004750973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002513027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.84397E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.5204E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9779E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7335E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.0232E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Harry Reid
Mr. President, I yield 15 minutes to the Senator from Illinois, Mr. Durbin.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0646888511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0239957386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0209139369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0037252834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.002115757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0013000953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001947671
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.52549E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.27225E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.0162E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.788E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.8
Gunning-Fog Score
1.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.012033563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0102965743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0015800528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000464349
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004594765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001856699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.99683E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.59691E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.38807E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.9347E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.2016E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.7
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Dick Durbin
I thank the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1714144601
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0503484043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0128890184
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0071830116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0050970506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0021114112
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020830314
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006064988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.00029922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001449254
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.67647E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Dick Durbin
Mr. President, the American people have had an incredible civics lesson these past few months. No novelist, no playwright, no movie director -- not even the creator of the X-Files -- could have dreamed up a more intricate, a more convoluted, or more fantastic plot than the one played out in our national political arena in last year's Presidential election.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
0.367
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0727310136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0377495773
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.016341795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0161198506
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0110686189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0088829329
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033130113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009212639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0003699218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002229077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001155389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.7
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Dick Durbin
For weeks on end, it seemed there was only one topic of conversation: Who won the election? And that conversation focused on some of the most arcane aspects of constitutional law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0475278823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0293455087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0196661917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0076173776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0058464178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009070996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007304692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004686496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002700404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002198958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001394489
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Dick Durbin
What if Florida cannot send a slate of electors to the electoral college? What if they send two slates? Are contested elections a State or a national issue? Or for that matter, a county by county issue? Who ultimately decides the results of a disputed election? Congress? The Florida Supreme Court? Federal district court? The Supreme Court? What about the vote of the people? Doesn't that count?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.782
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1249623136
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.073555921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0455057918
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0188622027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012097839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000994424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008145097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006322897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002480608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.90115E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.52648E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.5
Gunning-Fog Score
7.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Dick Durbin
Woven through every one of these questions is a crucial feature of our American style of democracy -- the separation of powers. This is perhaps our Nation's most critical feature, our backbone, if you will.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.374
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.286648958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0518694404
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0285715098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0073011935
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0072781011
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063841922
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007068004
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.80664E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.09111E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6722E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.567E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Dick Durbin
For without a clear cut separation of powers -- a separation between the Federal branches of Government, and between the Federal Government and the States -- our system of Government founders and fails.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.8473
VADER
-0.449
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1167983981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0357606041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0297398801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.018106123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0136986564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0013294859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008956132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005666611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001697664
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001296461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.05364E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Dick Durbin
Prior to the creation of the Federal courts, Alexander Hamilton envisioned in Federalist No. 78 that "the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power." Given the recent role the Supreme Court played in last November's Presidential election, Alexander Hamilton's vision was wrong.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.128
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.099672447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.019165632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0144131584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032822838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019241585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014379268
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001022032
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.16285E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.73315E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.71832E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.2921E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Dick Durbin
Our delicate balance of power has tipped in favor of nine justices that have the power to legislate from the bench and have now elevated the Court as the most powerful of the three "departments of power." Commenting on the Supreme Court's role in picking the President, Laurence Tribe noted that the Justices were "driven by something other than what was visible on the face of the opinions." We will continue to ponder whether the Court's decision was derived from established legal and constitutional principles. Or whether the Court was "results oriented" and searched for a rationale to substantiate a decision more political than legal.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
0.897
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1548854052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1158726867
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0617432466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0340700586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0060429364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.004440366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005645586
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0005600097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002918154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001697986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.70763E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.6
Gunning-Fog Score
18.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
38
Sprache Difficult Word Count
38
Dick Durbin
In our Government this question of the separation of powers never goes away. It is here before us today, in this bill, with this amendment, with the issue of campaign finance reform. Specifically, it confronts us with the issues of severability and nonseverability.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
-0.226
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.9339962155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0418341806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.035163248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0187223326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004560443
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003543804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001214477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.75225E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.52997E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.8322E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.06538E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Dick Durbin
When the Congress of the United States creates a new law of the land, how difficult should it be for another branch of Government to strike it down?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1678455621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0734332774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0111470108
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0061697181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019698609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011819704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006847738
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001619754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001572768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001111062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.72655E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Dick Durbin
For the executive branch of Government, the answer has always been clear. The President can veto any law we pass. Congress can override a Presidential veto with a two-thirds majority in each house. The balance of power between Congress and the executive branch is part of our national strength.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0.7
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
4.0565662086
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1397901913
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.050092116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.014420884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.004073892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018374074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005359519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004545758
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001752093
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.77043E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.59778E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Dick Durbin
But what of the balance of power between Congress and the Judiciary?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0614703575
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0597394886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0066430075
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022353599
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0015043071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012529877
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.12969E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.95006E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.75247E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.08465E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.0155E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.7
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Dick Durbin
Federal courts have the authority to decide on the constitutional legitimacy of the laws passed by Congress, and to dispose of any provisions of the law they find unconstitutional. It is an ultimate authority dating back to Marbury v. Madison. If the Supreme Court declares a provision of law to be unconstitutional, it is conclusive.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0904239947
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0398738455
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0099211378
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063091153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0058365971
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0018536644
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0012620251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004533255
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003597153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001787735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.7894E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Dick Durbin
Short of changing the Constitution itself, a step we have taken only 17 times since the passage of the Bill of Rights, there are no options. A finding of unconstitutionality by the Supreme Court effectively voids congressional and Presidential action. This, too, is a vital part of the balance of powers. And I respect it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.863
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0375733798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.010331352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0093463568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0076652366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0026837735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014569159
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007755509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001774397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001289945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.42291E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.645E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.1
Gunning-Fog Score
8.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Dick Durbin
The nonseverability amendment would alter, even if only slightly, the balance of power between the legislature and the judiciary. Is this a wise change to make?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0831508834
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.041880543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0062820749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011369526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006129444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002121589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001979429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.37391E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.7679E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0606E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.072E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Dick Durbin
I have been grappling with this question these past few days. And grappling, as well, with some of the profound and, I must say, unsettling changes that have occurred at the Supreme Court in recent years.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
0.691
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0223969633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0062880921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039265145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029711791
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022816615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012149265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010411734
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001724156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.24543E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.04918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.282E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
8.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Dick Durbin
My perception and I confess this is my own, of where the Court is today, and the direction in which it is heading, will carry great weight in my ultimate decision about the nonseverability issue.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.017978526
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0137520416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0081725979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.006264577
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0057553541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012157796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009560478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007169818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002043533
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000139951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.0836E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Dick Durbin
A law professor at New York University wrote an interesting article on this very topic a few weeks back in the New York Times. The author's name is Larry Kramer, and his article, which could hardly be more to the point, was titled "The Supreme Court v. Balance of Powers." His main point, which I think he makes quite convincingly, is that:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.847
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0282328372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0253086153
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0173803637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0157495568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0096033065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0053786625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025868021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009962143
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005457798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001036295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.39153E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71
Gunning-Fog Score
9.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Dick Durbin
Many of the Supreme Court's recent decisions have indeed been made by the conservative majority. Decisions are often carried on the basis of a single vote. Age discrimination -- five to four. Gay rights -- five to four. Warrantless police searches -- five to four. The Federal role in death penalty cases -- five to four. And of course, the selection of the 43rd President of the United States -- five to four.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.58779
VADER
-0.128
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.066002243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0071590162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0033506851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001833866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006747865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003481397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001889396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001301646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.78083E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.3239E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.48E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.6
Gunning-Fog Score
8.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
10.1
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Dick Durbin
Justice John Paul Stevens, in his dissenting opinion to this last decision, said:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0.527
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0174852161
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0061795872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034221692
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014610998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0011883982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003859807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000259267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.32201E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.55795E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.7031E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.065E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Dick Durbin
This is my own starting point for reflecting on the nonseverability question. I agree with Justice Stevens. My confidence in the impartiality of the Supreme Court has been shaken. The American judicial system has been increasingly politicized. Politicized by the unseemly rejection by the Senate of qualified nominees to the Federal bench. Politicized by the recent decision by the White House to end the half century involvement of the American Bar Association in reviewing the qualifications of potential nominees to the Federal bench -- a tradition that dates back to the Eisenhower administration.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.09091
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.16705
VADER
0.84
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0452557171
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0132802626
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0070003487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014003805
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010111517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006994519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006467723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001651392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001313116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.56637E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.8214E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.4
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
36
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37
Dick Durbin
With that as context -- recognizing that for many the impartiality of the Supreme Court is being called into question -- I return to the question of nonseverability. Is this a Supreme Court to whom we want to hand over the absolute authority to rewrite whatever campaign finance reform measure ultimately is enacted by Congress?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.813
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.4561835434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0542685972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0402369944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0129220731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0035891819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022744205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020208881
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005962356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004826406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004755038
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002485979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Dick Durbin
I am not enamored by the idea of granting to the Court -- particularly this Court -- such authority. Maintaining severability denies them the opportunity to sink the entire law on the basis of the constitutionality of one provision.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.018821581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0163529083
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0056525201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011405973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004920739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004156072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001408878
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.71311E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.3744E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.01989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.6959E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
25.7
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Dick Durbin
At the same time, I am not enamored by the prospect of allowing this Supreme Court to selectively dismantle our campaign finance reform measures, picking and choosing among the different provisions to find ones that suit their visions of reform, and rejecting the rest.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.61904
VADER
0.026
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2154767048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1217386452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0562624598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0242941955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063162603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001578786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004807347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003958627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001337111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001062573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.9989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
27.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Dick Durbin
The last time we tried this in Congress and sent the law across the street, it had a pretty disastrous outcome. The Supreme Court at that time decided they would limit how we raise money for campaigns. They would not limit, as Congress wanted to, the ultimate amount of money spent on campaigns, and then they came in with a decision in Buckley v. Valeo in 1976 and said, incidentally, millionaires in America, when it comes to campaign financing, are above the law. Now that preposterous outcome was rationalized by them and has been capitalized on by candidates since.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.44
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0278761669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0065827786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0019880956
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016268319
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006897952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000164581
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.14485E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2658E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.7239E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.418E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.46E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Dick Durbin
Campaign finance activist Ben Senturia compared the Buckley decision by the Court relating to campaign finance reform to that of a large tree in the middle of a ball field. The game can still be played, he says, but it has to be played around the tree.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0636296987
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0593117962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0558927015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0174752495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0161621894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015645859
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008187338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005622267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003355552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001729545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.35709E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Dick Durbin
Despite my serious misgivings about this Supreme Court, the opportunity severability will give it to move beyond the role of constitutional arbiter, to actually craft their vision of campaign finance reform, I will vote against the Frist amendment for three reasons.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.598
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0086938417
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038934453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0030145242
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005536348
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002427815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002033484
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.50401E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8122E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.7498E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.3555E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.675E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
10.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Dick Durbin
First, for the good of our Nation, the strength of our Government, and the future of the Court, I must still retain the faith and the hope that the Supreme Court will rise above any political consideration to judge this law on its constitutional merits.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.952
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.010269638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.003216496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0027915608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0025117472
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002841165
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001659174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001561194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001120423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.8793E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.90182E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.2066E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Dick Durbin
Second, taking my misgivings about the distribution of the Court to their logical conclusion, Congress would have to raise this matter on every legislative issue we face. That would invite confrontation and chaos that would not serve our Nation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.66
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0217748617
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0057204772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0037014088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014584924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0010719771
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009721735
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007615528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.99006E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.59117E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.2482E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.097E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.2
Gunning-Fog Score
15
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Dick Durbin
Third and finally, I have supported McCain-Feingold and campaign finance reform from the start. I am prepared to set aside my heartfelt concerns over the issue of severability rather than jeopardizing this good-faith effort to clean up the tawdry campaign climate in America.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.856
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0755076704
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0447030441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0076838332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0043142263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0043048152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025782761
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010489792
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.000812261
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007930479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.33802E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.3673E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Dick Durbin
I support the severability provision in this bill and oppose the Frist amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0378705416
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0269043492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0201279399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0181838914
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0057071225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001568629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0013774306
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006138798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004214686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.40251E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.08268E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Dick Durbin
I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0505322882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0177514958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.012415454
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015077499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013737719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004266788
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001239807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.18188E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.23269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.21547E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7452E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.306254928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0540057896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0195308603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.011467556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019998435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0004933882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004865174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001690138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001616041
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001249752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.97275E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Harry Reid
Mr. President, before the Senator from Illinois leaves the floor, I express my personal appreciation for his speech. I say that, recognizing that he and I have been in Congress the same length of time. We came together to the House of Representatives. During that period of time, I have gotten to know him well and I recognize his history as being a real legislator, a parliamentarian as he was in the State of Illinois.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.66
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.049337215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.032719571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.011885562
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0111050511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0031082818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014330067
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003342324
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.32272E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.0621E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.57989E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4428E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
59.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Harry Reid
This debate has been a very good debate. During the past couple of weeks, we have had some very fine presentations made. But when we look back on the presentations made, there will not be any better than the one just made by the Senator from Illinois. Not only did he deliver it well, as he always does, the Senator from Illinois has no peer, in my estimation, as someone able to present facts. But here, not only did he do a great job in his delivery, the substance of what he said is really meaningful.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.882
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0239072673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0107825894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0093865856
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006840787
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005034583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000146376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.73779E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.13296E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.2049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.3191E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.2758E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Harry Reid
For someone such as me who struggled with this issue of severability, he certainly laid the foundation, in effect poured the cement. I have no question the Senator from Illinois is right on this issue. I am personally very grateful for having been present to listen to this brilliant presentation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.265
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0268327509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047383342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0044651555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0023483854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006733234
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0004780629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000127632
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001256356
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.97884E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7826E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.608E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1610624138
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0101598147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0037255071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005981595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004248391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0003978974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003439647
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001598964
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.85031E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.55782E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.0747E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.8
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Harry Reid
I yield to the Senator from Wisconsin for 15 minutes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0542284513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0250971818
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.008833332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0070110975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0061018563
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0051347866
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0048025046
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0033341326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001059535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.44511E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.92633E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.2
Gunning-Fog Score
4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
2.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, let me join in the comments the Senator from Nevada made about the presentation of the Senator from Illinois. I know he thought long and hard about this. I am grateful, not only for his decision on this but also for the rationale and presentation he made. I thank him for it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.565
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.4005024675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.081153604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0215434862
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0136205723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0046923113
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0017001192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009123154
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004180703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001477744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001459933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.32916E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Russ Feingold
I appreciate very much the way the Senator from Tennessee, Senator Thompson, kicked off the debate on our side. He made some very powerful points about how this issue of severability and nonseverability relates to the separation of powers and issues of judicial restraint. What I would like to do is use my time to talk about what this means for our effort to do something about the campaign financing system in our country.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.806
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0517601206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.050277746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0157678587
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0035212535
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0020341466
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0018547307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0010659189
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000778974
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0007642994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001969699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.32353E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, the Senate is being asked to agree to an amendment that would make two provisions of this bill "nonseverable" from one another. What does "nonseverable" mean? What does it mean for this bill? And what does this vote mean for the cause of reform?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.466
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1278952346
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0313820114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0255567429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0067537156
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020830712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0011487726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003927966
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003796022
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002950157
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.83588E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.21328E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Russ Feingold
My friend John McCain has said that nonseverability is French for "kill campaign finance reform." That is a pretty good short definition. But in simple legal and practical terms, the addition of this kind of nonseverability clause means that the soft money and Snowe-Jeffords provision, title I and title II of the bill, would become a single integrated unit for purposes of constitutional scrutiny, that its many separate sections would all stand or fall together if any part of it is challenged in court on constitutional grounds. So, if this amendment passes, and the bill passes into law in a form that includes this amendment, and some time later a federal court finds one provision of either the soft money ban or the Snowe- Jeffords provision to be unconstitutional, then both of those provisions will be struck down, and it will be as if we had never passed a campaign finance reform bill at all.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
-0.226
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Harassment
1.0564246215
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1838653814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0377926568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019355468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0006533573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003721529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002972107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001858282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001727059
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001140103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.30693E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
42
Sprache Difficult Word Count
40
Russ Feingold
Our bill contains an explicit severability clause, added only for emphasis. We pass hundreds of bills in each Congress, and each of them is deemed implicitly to be comprised of severable parts, unless it contains "nonseverability" language. Two weeks ago we passed a bankruptcy bill, that ran on for hundreds of pages. I thought it was a bad bill, I wish it were not about to become law. Still, I understand that if some part of its hundreds of pages is struck down on constitutional grounds, the rest will stand. The same is true of nearly every bill we have passed or will in the future pass in this body. In fact, I am informed that during the last 12 years only 10 bills have been introduced, let alone passed, that contain a nonseverability clause. It is incredibly unusual.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
-0.25
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0191274754
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0181251395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0055871817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0050358696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045224813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0011149103
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010376902
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009393212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0004143401
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002453661
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001427869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
11.1
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
30
Sprache Difficult Word Count
30
Russ Feingold
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that even without a severability clause, the presumption is that Congress intends for each provision of a bill to be evaluated on its own merits and severed from the bill if it is found to be unconstitutional. In Alaska Airlines v. Brock, for example, the Court said:
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.586
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0048973514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0040125746
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014397695
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0007556062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002888043
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001296952
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.51405E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.4939E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.4303E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4582E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.872E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Russ Feingold
That is the general rule. In order to overcome that presumption there has to be specific evidence that Congress would not have passed the constitutional provisions without the unconstitutional provisions.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0157707458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0116878764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0102622864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009111929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009079366
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000265202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.51008E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.04122E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.077E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4942E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3587E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
33.7
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Russ Feingold
Senator McCain and I have drafted a bill that we believe is constitutionally sound. My record is not the record of a legislator who is casual about the first amendment, but some people, out of legitimate concern, and some other people, seeking strategic advantage in their effort to kill reform, have raised first amendment questions about the Snowe-Jeffords provisions of the bill, which would place restrictions on the use corporate and union treasury of phony issue ads run on radio or TV within 60 days of general election. Similar questions have been raised about the Wellstone amendment that extends the Snowe-Jeffords restrictions to issue ads run by independent groups.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.17647
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.17647
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.33647
VADER
-0.402
Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.087756943
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.031431028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049029357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0023129725
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017017541
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012196816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003873879
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001392683
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.11077E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.97995E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.4286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.7
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
36
Russ Feingold
We knew that our bill would face this scrutiny and we drafted the Snowe-Jeffords provision with care and respect for the right to political speech, but if we, or the author of a successful amendment to our bill, has missed the constitutional mark, there are federal courts to rule on the question. Ultimately, under our system of government, there is a Supreme Court to give the final word about the constitutionality of any part of our bill that may be challenged. And if the Supreme Court says that some piece of our bill is unconstitutional, that's the last word, and we would have to accept that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.53846
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.965
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.044514882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0300873246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0179671639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0072591363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0050032286
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0035359251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0017129645
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010910619
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004145555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002509822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.62606E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.1
Gunning-Fog Score
18.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Russ Feingold
But this amendment goes much farther. It would mean that if the Supreme Court finds a defect in the Snowe-Jeffords provision, and strikes it down, then the soft money ban will be invalidated as well. This makes no sense. It respects neither the proper rule of the Court, nor the proper role of the Congress. We have a Congress to pass laws, in this case a set of laws. We have a Supreme Court to tell us when one of those laws is unconstitutional and must cease to have effect.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.99853
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0270245597
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.010204596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0061605409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021210944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.001428248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008921513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004748423
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.22915E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.9821E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.9668E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.807E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.8
Gunning-Fog Score
7.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Russ Feingold
I try to avoid cliches in debate, but here I must implore my colleagues, don't vote for an amendment that obliges this Senate and the Court to throw the baby out with the bathwater. In this case, the bathwater is the Snowe-Jeffords provision that we have always known will face a constitutional challenge, and while we believe there is a strong argument for it being upheld, we cannot state with any certainty that it will. But the most important provision in our bill, the baby in our metaphor, is the soft money ban. The sponsor of this amendment knows that he will never get the Court to say that the soft money ban is unconstitutional. He holds out hope that Snowe-Jeffords will be found to be constitutionally flawed, so he pins his hopes on the extraordinary, mechanistic and, in this case, cynical device of non- severability. It is his only chance, because he knows he can't beat reform in the Congress, and he knows he can't possibly beat the most important part of it in the courts, not in any analysis on the merits.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.04
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.04
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.07696
VADER
0.75
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0626307621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.01761163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020448673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008637659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004697105
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001283464
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
8.09212E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.16053E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.9901E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3049E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.315E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
40
Sprache Difficult Word Count
42
Russ Feingold
So I urge my colleagues to vote against this amendment, and I add these words of caution: If you vote for this amendment, you are voting to place in peril the most important reform measure in this bill. If you vote for this amendment, you vote for a gross departure from ordinary legislative procedure. If you vote for this amendment, you vote to distort the usual proper role of and relationship between the courts and this Congress. If you vote for this amendment, you vote, and will be seen to vote, for maximizing the chances of the enemies of reform to prevail against the decisions of this Senate and against the will of the American people.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.814
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0575730868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0096315991
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0062200685
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0043555232
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004706728
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003701703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002419109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.85396E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.1814E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.6091E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.624E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.2
Gunning-Fog Score
17.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Russ Feingold
I must also point out to those of my colleagues who have told me privately, or have stated in public that they support a ban on soft money but cannot vote for the bill because they believe the Snowe- Jeffords amendment is unconstitutional, you should vote against this amendment. If you would vote for a bill that includes a soft money ban and no provision on issue ads, you should vote here to preserve the option for the Supreme Court to uphold a soft money ban and strike down the Snowe-Jeffords amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
-0.872
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0884009351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.059184595
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.006151219
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008964018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008368148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0007781513
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.64174E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.64576E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.26429E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.8946E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.961E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Russ Feingold
I made this clear in the last few days. I believe this is the vote. This vote is the ultimate test for the Senate in this debate on campaign finance reform. It might be called the campaign finance reform test. The American people are standing by, waiting to see whether this body will pass or fail that test. Do not let them down my colleagues. There are no makeup exams.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.691
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0271711266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0101436483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0062191786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021185029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0014255293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000892616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004717441
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.18269E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.03368E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.0112E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.874E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84.3
Gunning-Fog Score
5.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
7
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Russ Feingold
This is the vote that will decide if we are going to be able to get rid of this awful soft money system -- to really get rid of it, not just pass a bill in the Senate, not just pass a bill in the House, not just have the President sign it, but actually have it survive a court challenge and become the law of the land.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.61904
VADER
0.115
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.006510294
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029582274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0028519111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016118216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010799573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005668049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000446148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.3535E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.04555E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.82252E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.9542E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
5.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Russ Feingold
Before yielding the floor, I ask unanimous consent a letter sent to our Democratic colleagues of the Senate by Representative Meehan and Representative Frank of the other body on March 22 be printed in the Record.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.106584013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0361884886
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0044594406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010562369
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005990712
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001170468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.88848E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.55789E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.02523E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.7844E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.41E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
26.9
Gunning-Fog Score
16.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Russ Feingold
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0583634363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0495780027
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0448542152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0194618551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0136955874
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0055314842
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0047348603
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0039197545
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032223634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003062194
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.90267E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, how much time remains on the Frist amendment?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0550384924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0253856095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0123508289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.005308216
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0024753717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022903272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008467539
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002358516
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.3418E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.4504E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.3867E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
83.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
3.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Fitzgerald). The proponents have 53 minutes and the opponents have 44 minutes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0304676883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0172261993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0143957557
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095164847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041444218
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021746058
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004781249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004678851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003763006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.86526E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.43743E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
5.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, I have been listening carefully to the speeches on the other side of this issue. With all due respect, they are somewhat misleading.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.288
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0256085274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0225597367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0058756996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.005353149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0052298132
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009271074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003262652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003252298
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.22694E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.5544E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.984E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73.2
Gunning-Fog Score
9.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Mitch McConnell
The last three campaign finance reform bills that passed out of the Senate included nonseverability clauses -- in 1990, 1992, and 1993. Members of the Senate who voted for that include 23 current Members who supported the bill with a nonseverability clause in it in 1990; 24 of the current Members supported the bill in 1992 with a nonseverability clause in it; and 28 of the current Members supported the bill in 1993 with a nonseverability clause in it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.71
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4623066634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1826762804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1453906414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.019662347
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0195752888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095878975
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033642449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020944532
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012239335
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.22385E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.04579E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Mitch McConnell
It is wholly irrelevant whether most bills do or don't have nonseverability clauses. What we are talking about is campaign finance reform bills which are fraught with first amendment constitutional principles, and it has been almost always the rule rather than the exception that they include nonseverability clauses in them.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1078122179
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0457839109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0294783677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0270580756
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0061387371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0046193691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0011812243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003283134
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.62776E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.8246E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.17E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
32.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Mitch McConnell
It is so common that the Harkin amendment we just voted on and was supported by 31 Members of the Senate on that side of the aisle had a nonseverability provision in it tied to Snowe-Jeffords; also, the amendment we had a couple of hours ago in which 31 Members of the Senate on the other side supported.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.557
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4590866622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1809160342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1447138609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0197124318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0193869389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0093675742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033450116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020349169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011974618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.06337E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.9441E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
23.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Mitch McConnell
So this notion that somehow it is inappropriate and unwise to have a nonseverability clause in a campaign finance bill is utterly and totally baseless and without merit. In fact, that is what is typically done.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.135
Leans Negative
Moderation
Hate
0.009749984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0058941183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0042145446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0037100806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0034232693
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0017673507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003242944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001989393
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001889149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001813323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001086853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Mitch McConnell
I say to my friends who support the underlying bill, what are you afraid of? There have been numerous discussions and hearings about how constitutional Snowe-Jeffords is. We have had lengthy discussion on the floor by various Members of the Senate.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.7
Very Positive
Moderation
Hate
0.0481007824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0479817449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.018559453
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0174367015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0134945411
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0116955802
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0085733387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0032141812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0008713635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.11289E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.2314E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Mitch McConnell
Senator Snowe, of Snowe-Jeffords fame, says it is constitutional. It is common sense. It is not speech rationing but informational, and so on. Senator Snowe referred to 70, as she put it, constitutional experts.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.56495
VADER
0.238
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0240059206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0216683882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.006484209
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0061129227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0053442585
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008921988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003996864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003701181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.66321E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.26637E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.558E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Mitch McConnell
Senator Jeffords says: My focus will be on reassuring you that Snowe- Jeffords is constitutional. He says they took great care in drafting their language.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.875
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4601612687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.179348106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1425443799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0194062668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0193566288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0094706957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0032857883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020290317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011885591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.04716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.9818E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Mitch McConnell
Senator McCain is, likewise, totally confident that Snowe-Jeffords is constitutional. Senator Thompson, the same.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.537
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0196539128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0152546068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0152367982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0054082979
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0053352505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.004998851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004614552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030726187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0030075205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0021515702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0014935589
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
13.1
Gunning-Fog Score
16.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Mitch McConnell
Senator Edwards is on the floor now. He said he is totally confident that Snowe-Jeffords is carefully crafted to meet the constitutional test of Buckley v. Valeo.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.608
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0685469422
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0128364365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.008750258
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025524125
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022452519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0018939321
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007299017
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.28304E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.0417E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7807E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.28E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Mitch McConnell
Senator DeWine offered an amendment to take Snowe-Jeffords out earlier today. That was defeated. It is a part of the bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.477
Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.035273406
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0111244146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0066447697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012517444
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003904944
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002032591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001940883
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001204283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.33789E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.27681E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.787E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
3.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Mitch McConnell
Those who want to keep that in the bill are totally confident that it is constitutional.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.581
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0253387436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0223314128
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0056329332
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0033355544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0013073949
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012901379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009481954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008077813
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.92666E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.42662E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.5615E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Mitch McConnell
What are they afraid of?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.4624258727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1802861691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1427570707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0195652872
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0194166307
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0094771181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033284654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020735239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011975429
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.13361E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.01689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Mitch McConnell
As the author of the amendment, Senator Frist pointed out that there is a rationale for linking Snowe-Jeffords and the soft money ban. And it is this, I say to my friend from North Carolina: What if I am right and they are wrong, and Snowe-Jeffords is struck down, the Democratic Senatorial Committee loses 35 percent of its budget, and the Democratic National Committee loses 40 percent of its budget? If candidates are under attack by conservative groups from outside, who is going to rush to their defense?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.901
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.1545145642
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0872885983
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0840552151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.048923766
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0214284155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0211772858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0055867389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0018905414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007161843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001574893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001216212
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.6
Gunning-Fog Score
14.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Mitch McConnell
The party is the only entity in America that will certainly support the candidates that bear its label. There is nobody else you can totally depend on to be there to defend you when you are under assault.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.459
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4590866622
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1809160342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1447138609
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0197124318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0193869389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0093675742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033450116
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020349169
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011974618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.06337E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.9441E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Mitch McConnell
There is a rationale for linking Snowe-Jeffords and the party soft money ban; that is, if we eliminate it, and if all of the Senators who are confident, including the Senator from North Carolina, that it is constitutional are wrong, every group in America -- conservative, liberal, vegetarian, and libertarian -- will all have a right to come after our candidates and our parties will be largely defenseless.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.103
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0241057598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0208671481
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0064062326
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0063852698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0057752241
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0008360777
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003807447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000377333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.33644E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.15286E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.812E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Mitch McConnell
I asked consent later this afternoon to have some time at 4 o'clock to describe to the Members of the Senate the impact of McCain-Feingold on our political parties. I am going to take the opportunity to do that at 4 o'clock. It will be chilling to learn what will happen to our parties under this underlying bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.84
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4601612687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1793481992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1425444614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0194062668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0193566288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0094706957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003285785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020290337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011885591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.04716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.9818E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.9
Gunning-Fog Score
10.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Mitch McConnell
Let me sum up because I see the coauthor of the amendment is on the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0228249308
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0115214505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0061731902
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.006136806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008238295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006651243
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002067364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.98253E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.01715E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.828E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.104E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Mitch McConnell
I don't think this is in any way inappropriate. In fact, it is common. If the proponents of Snowe-Jeffords are confident it will be upheld, I don't know what they are afraid of. We will need the political parties to defend our candidates if Snowe-Jeffords is struck down.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.599
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.050208281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0316137186
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0112241272
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016736929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0012879976
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003536137
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001590182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001199402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.36477E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.1593E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.53E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
Mitch McConnell
I yield the floor. I see the Senator from Louisiana is here.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.016795643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0149688611
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0079874677
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0013482486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0009474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003364768
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.59273E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.98694E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.18605E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.894E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.53E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.9
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0417197851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0269658543
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0058163227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0020570958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0009927687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001850409
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001302602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.24271E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.08725E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.7757E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0488E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
14.3
Gunning-Fog Score
6.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Who yields time to the Senator?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0588765892
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0587902323
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0048929731
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0036155448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016741638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008546933
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002025957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.13357E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.74803E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.6122E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.4717E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
87.9
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
1.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Bill Frist
Mr. President, I yield 15 minutes to the Senator from Louisiana.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0078994031
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0070713941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024788182
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006631413
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006434495
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004297928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001589408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001083109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.32289E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.92207E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.52177E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.5
Gunning-Fog Score
2.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0444011763
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0303183187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034536726
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0017857379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004442511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003633871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002961785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.22817E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.60788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.9025E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.539E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
John Breaux
Mr. President, I thank the author of the bill, the Senator from Tennessee, for yielding time to me.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0444402831
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0382098457
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0049273556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0028085087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0010180458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007235582
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.56597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.09139E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.954E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.57153E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.4225E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.2
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
John Breaux
We have just heard a good explanation of the situation from the Senator from Kentucky about the concern of the so-called severability. Imagine most people in America scratching their heads and asking: What in the world is the Senate talking about -- nonseverability, severability, and everything else? When we talk about severability, back in Louisiana they think someone lost an arm or a finger. They get very confused when we start talking about severability in legislation as an integral part of a bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.25131
VADER
-0.242
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1857379917
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1671676408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1036057598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0189934784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017998584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0016323162
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.01159E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.74246E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.7297E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.4886E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.973E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
29.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
John Breaux
We have learned the mistake we make when we craft a carefully constructed compromise that people are allowed to vote for because it is carefully balanced with amendments through the legislative process and then have that legislation go to a court which says that one part of this bill we will take out and we are going to leave everything else, or the court will say they will take out half of it and leave everything else. We tried that in 1971 when we wrote the landmark Federal elections law. I was running for Congress then and was watching it very carefully, not knowing what in the world the results would be. But I looked at it at that time, as the people helped write it, as a carefully crafted compromise. It did not have a nonseverability clause in that legislation. When it left this body and it left the House, a lot of people said: This is a good balance; I got this in it; I got that in it; I got limits on contributions but we got limits on how they can spend it; therefore, I think this is a good package; it makes sense; it is reform.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.52381
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.52381
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.325
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0226363351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0186647434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0152987006
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0120352051
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006452986
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003850972
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.96494E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.27186E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.4225E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.7775E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7235E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
40
John Breaux
Because it didn't have a nonseverability clause in it, which we are trying to add in this legislation, when it got to the Supreme Court, in its wisdom, said: Well, this can stand and this can't stand; we are going to eliminate this and we are going to keep that.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.844
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0776122499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0392695249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0317961036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.00586475
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009367342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0006470278
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.64545E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.656E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.6791E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.107E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.588E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
44.4
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
8.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
John Breaux
In essence, what they did was replace the role of the Congress in writing the legislation as they thought in their final words what was legitimate and what was constitutional.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0354420801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0130120505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0120127304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.009155352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0032256838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008291024
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0002972419
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002419289
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001897076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001557757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001172702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
49.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
John Breaux
Guess what. We ended up for all of these years with a bill that was totally different from what the Congress had carefully crafted. In essence, what we ended up with was a bill that limited contributions but had no limits on expenditures. What we thought we were doing was saying, all right, we are going to reduce the money in campaigns, we are going to eliminate expenditures, and limit contributions. What we ended up with was only one-half of the equation. This body, the other body, this Congress and past Congresses learned from that monumental mistake.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.1431
VADER
-0.727
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0225258424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0117122094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017576675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010963814
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007202145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005029798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002062696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001820815
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.77691E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.5331E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.5338E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
John Breaux
As the Senator from Kentucky pointed out, when we considered campaign finance legislation in subsequent Congresses, we didn't make that mistake. We considered it in the 101st Congress, the 102d Congress, and the 103d Congress. And in every one of those Congresses we did not make the same mistake that we made in 1971.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.248
Slightly Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0553412072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.035884144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0247857388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054126478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0032080352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010337354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.9113E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.06918E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.49756E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.3256E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.6862E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.2
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
John Breaux
We took the position in those acts of the Congress that the carefully crafted compromise was going to have to be accepted or rejected; the Court could not piecemeal it. They could not rewrite it. They could not decide in their wisdom what they thought was legitimate and keep that and throw out what they thought was unconstitutional. We did not make the mistake in the previous Congresses that we did the first time.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.478
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0625956396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0308855291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0026557573
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023581228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0016374564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007323176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002746769
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001301107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.59597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.39219E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.6488E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
70.3
Gunning-Fog Score
12.3
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
John Breaux
I hope what we do here is to also recognize that we should say that this carefully crafted compromise, the ban on soft money to parties plus the restrictions on outside groups running sham ads 60 days before an election, are intricately tied together. They are part of the compromise. If you knock out one, you break the deal. Without this amendment, we will have perhaps only half of the deal being enacted into law and the other half disappearing because of a Court decision.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.494090328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.134256389
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0052030555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0043473483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0038772461
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000412757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001900838
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001569509
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.59825E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.76941E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2779E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
60.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
John Breaux
That is not what the role of legislators should be. We should be putting together comprehensive packages with intricate amendments and compromises woven together to create a package.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.572
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
7.5209908187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.8524245583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.4301066045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0956525386
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0110285415
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.001364374
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004257395
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001267836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.97373E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.1203E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1289E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
John Breaux
There are people who would not be for this legislation, I dare say, if they thought the Snowe-Jeffords legislation on money being spent on sham ads right before the election were not restricted in this bill. What do we say to those people who voted for it because of Snowe- Jeffords being part of it: That somehow it may not be there in the end? They would not have voted for the legislation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.12
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0548348529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0259511551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0081019927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0035631096
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013736606
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004870341
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002610387
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.18719E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.77438E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.64636E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.8559E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
John Breaux
It is so significant that we have this nonseverability clause. It is very restrictive, and I want to expand it. I will ask unanimous consent to offer an amendment to the Frist-Breaux amendment which will include the soft money ban plus the Snowe-Jeffords amendment plus the Thompson amendment which increased the hard dollar contributions, that if any one of those three would be found to be unconstitutional, all three would fall.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.29928
VADER
0.225
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0211642458
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0079704398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029476927
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.001041381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005006392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000157188
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
9.66495E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.43268E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.07643E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.268E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.093E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.7
Gunning-Fog Score
15.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
John Breaux
It makes no sense, I agree, to have the ban, for instance, on soft dollars to be declared unconstitutional, which it probably is not, but if it should be, then you would be left with a hard dollar increase. It makes no sense to say that, well, we could ban or declare unconstitutional the Snowe-Jeffords prohibition but yet still have the hard dollar increase. All three are integral parts of this compromise. I think the Frist-Breaux amendment should be amended to say that if either of those three essential ingredients is knocked down as unconstitutional, therefore, all three of them would fall. That would be the right thing to do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.63636
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.335
VADER
-0.542
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.2394087147
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1278714743
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0222900402
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.019241804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0039826864
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015954334
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000916247
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0008391723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005200637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004025474
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002781372
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.7
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
John Breaux
That doesn't mean the whole bill falls. Everything else is still there: The millionaire's amendment, the lowest unit rate for television would still be there, the ban on foreign contributions, the ban on solicitations. Those are all still improvements in the current system.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
-0.818
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0051564904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0039402512
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032316049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0011452317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002018809
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002008621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001276778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.3337E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.1435E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.9467E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.025E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
56.5
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
John Breaux
When I try to explain nonseverability to people, it gets very confusing. I am probably as confused as anyone trying to explain it to our colleagues and to the press, and to the general public, who have to cover all of this. I try to use the analogy of ANWR which I think makes sense. The question of whether we drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a very controversial and contentious issue. Suppose we came to the floor of the Senate and someone said: All right, I am willing to allow for drilling in ANWR if you double the environmental requirements that would apply to that part of the United States. That amendment is adopted. People say: Well, with that amendment, I can support drilling for oil in ANWR because we have an amendment that doubles the environmental protections in that part of the world only.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.56495
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.04348
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.04348
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.08338
VADER
0.123
Leans Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0805477088
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0639403181
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0103982835
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0069038571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034171342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006180682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005828951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000404667
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.2843E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.29415E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.347E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
37
John Breaux
But then that bill goes to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court says: Oops, sorry, you are all wrong, you can't do doubling of the environmental protections in only one part of the country. That part of the bill is unconstitutional. But the drilling for oil is OK.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.774
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.3620699514
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0835293613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0412823283
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0340537285
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0100439895
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006487071
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0004587794
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0004300954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.85221E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.06953E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.44E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
John Breaux
How would that treat all the Members of Congress who said: Well, I can vote for the carefully crafted compromise because at the same time we have doubled the environmental protections and therefore it is a comprehensive package and therefore it makes sense? To have the Court strike down the environmental protections while leaving the right to drill would be a sham on the Members of Congress who voted for the carefully crafted compromise.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.743
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1681998256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0413981121
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0225889438
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0095950876
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.005982953
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0055186549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002849479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.49756E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.10558E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.3935E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.7127E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
37.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
John Breaux
The same is true with regard to this controversial, complicated, emotional issue of how we handle campaigns in this country. All of the ingredients are essential to the compromise. To allow the Court to knock out one or two and leave the rest is to put into effect through law something that was never intended by the people who voted on it to ever occur. When you vote for all of the parts of the bill, you have the right to expect that all of the parts will survive.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.625
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0274963561
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0072923569
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0071821421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0032077998
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0027994174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.000286388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.53173E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.58205E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.26527E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.01516E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.8145E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
John Breaux
Someone said: Maybe we should do that for every piece of legislation. I say: Well, it may not be a bad idea, but certainly not a bad idea for things that are complicated and carefully crafted and subjected to numerous compromises that are part of the package.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
0.782
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0348382659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0156557537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0155915593
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0055436616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0028315129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003200486
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002391311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.38684E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.247E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.8519E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.5042E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48
Gunning-Fog Score
17.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
John Breaux
I am extremely concerned that we have a situation where we are going to ban soft money to the two political parties and somehow leave all of these groups and organizations that are running ads, special interest groups, basically single-interest groups, who will be able to continue to use all of the soft money they want to attack candidates for 2 years prior to our elections. None of these groups represents, I argue, the more moderate parts of both parties; they tend to be more extreme. Not all of them, some of them are moderate, but most are single-issue, one- issue groups that generally run only negative advertising against candidates.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.80235
VADER
-0.671
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0533834507
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.016901303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0164003795
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0023012939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018471916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010937477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000627836
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.70853E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.77711E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.3619E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.5051E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
39
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
John Breaux
Addressing this with the Snowe-Jeffords amendment, saying that corporate and union contributions cannot fund any of these groups within 60 days of an election, is an important step. If we don't have the nonseverability and Snowe-Jeffords is knocked out, all of these groups could use corporate money to continue to blast candidates without us having the same ability to help our parties respond to those accusations.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.735
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0593940204
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0194354492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.016048245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026928155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016181282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002259915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001460703
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.56591E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.6161E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.6155E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7753E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
30.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
John Breaux
I am talking about groups such as those that ran the Flo ads on Medicare. None of the people on my side liked those at all. I am talking about groups that ran the Harry and Louise ads which used corporate contributions to run negative ads all the way up to 60 days before the election, if this amendment goes down. I am talking about the National Rifle Association. To people principally on my side of the aisle, how many times do we have to see Charlton Heston talking about why Democrats should not be elected and having corporate contributions pay for those ads?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
-0.318
Somewhat Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.035949325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.027239733
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.004476996
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0036771293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0015625939
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015027871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002537427
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001296376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.99753E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.67744E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.66498E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.1
Gunning-Fog Score
11.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
29
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
John Breaux
Those principally on my side who are saying we want to vote for this because it is a carefully crafted compromise ought to recognize that without the Frist-Breaux amendment, that carefully crafted compromise could cease to exist. What we have done is to abdicate our responsibility to legislate in a package, not with blinders on, and not looking at reality.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.71429
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.46634
VADER
0.318
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0288344047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0131085151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0074290583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0021554293
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019974608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00084015
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001545607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.79912E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.435E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.76347E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.6377E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.3
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
John Breaux
I strongly support the nonseverability amendment. I plan at the appropriate time to ask that the amendment be modified in order to add a third category in addition to the soft money prohibition to parties and the Snowe-Jeffords amendment. I would add the Thompson amendment reflecting the increase in hard dollars, that any one of those three being declared unconstitutional would bring down all three of those.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.813
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0145056591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0050468021
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0035847042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034379816
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012339221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001099941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.93303E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
8.99667E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.2263E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.4648E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.62E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.8
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
John Breaux
I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0636687095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054369721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0031761607
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0024787592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002233592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001652865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.45069E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.04973E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.6074E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.54E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.0238E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.0166923448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0129299122
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.010514434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0041179163
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.003410408
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0021648744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0013530221
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004618351
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004042239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.45873E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.74429E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Chris Dodd
Reserving the right to object, I would like to get a copy of the modification.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.415456621
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.111339672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0623471511
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0615667843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0183129989
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0125276099
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0039818628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004432282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002189929
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001567282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.32434E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
5.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
John Breaux
Mr. President, if it is all right, I will hand a copy to my colleague, since he is managing the bill, and allow him the chance to review it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.19722
VADER
0.727
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0147885556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0103866492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.009423311
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0034630291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011810295
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006564615
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000152796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.31404E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.7611E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.4856E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.272E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
87.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.2
Coleman-Liau Index
5.7
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0068107009
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00213206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0020259266
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010228141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002751686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001640146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001416414
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.83946E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.2976E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.2321E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.253E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.8
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, if I may, Senators have the right to modify their amendments. I thank my colleague.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0280831708
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0101791804
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051936666
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005028048
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0013209274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006128281
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001498823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.33215E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.21179E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
7.703E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.9223E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.7
Gunning-Fog Score
7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, I am prepared to yield 5 minutes to my colleague from North Carolina, Senator Edwards.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
1.2859655544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0800287584
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.029202638
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0057058602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0026972646
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0019693556
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009878596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0007204885
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002305428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0001991719
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.25085E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.8
Gunning-Fog Score
3.4
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0269288081
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0233275714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0206317796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0040353654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003425123
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001469175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.5239E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.45911E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.95623E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.8907E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.1662E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
John Edwards
Mr. President, let me speak in opposition to this amendment. I'll talk briefly about why I oppose the amendment, and respond to the comment by the Senator from Kentucky and the Senator from Louisiana, who has just modified his amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.94591
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0839706277
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0155406175
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0145558297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0049860959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0034433855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032730568
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006104633
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001776847
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.85595E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.08118E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.3593E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.7
Gunning-Fog Score
10.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7
Sprache Readability Score
3.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
John Edwards
First, it is very important for my colleagues who aren't on the floor, in looking at the precise language of these amendments, to recognize there are really only three provisions, with the modification, that are covered by this amendment. The soft money ban is number one; the Snowe-Jeffords ban on broadcast ads paid out of union and corporation treasury funds 60 days before the election is number two; number three is the raising of the hard money limit.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.591
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0259465072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0252554397
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0158198469
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020362448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002015109
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0012961288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0005755941
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002676501
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.15541E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.73869E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9268E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
John Edwards
No one who has looked closely at this question would argue that either the soft money ban or the hard money limit increase is subject to serious constitutional challenge. The only thing the soft money ban has to do under the Buckley case is for the Court to find that there was a compelling State interest to support that ban. The Court, in fact, has already found in Buckley there is such an interest. So as these other Senators have recognized during the course of this debate, there is no serious question about the soft money ban. The soft money ban -- if it passes from this Chamber, and is signed by the President and passed by the House -- is going to become law.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-3.29584
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.05882
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.05882
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.11123
VADER
-0.927
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.0742098608
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0566883013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.041250739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0182891265
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0092791845
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0033007407
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0005322479
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003626618
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0003254789
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002153459
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.3632E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
10.9
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
John Edwards
The raising of the hard dollar limit also is not subject to any serious constitutional challenge. So what we are talking about is Snowe-Jeffords.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Moderation
Harassment
6.163386628
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
1.6695911065
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.1900767325
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1502582338
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0320414634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0283613364
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0026120528
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0010822605
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002533959
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002378111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.1484E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52
Gunning-Fog Score
8.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
John Edwards
Now my friend from Kentucky points out that during the course of this debate I have argued that Snowe-Jeffords is constitutional. I don't want to repeat that argument, but I, in fact, believe that Snowe- Jeffords is constitutional. But I want my colleagues to understand, and not get caught up too much in the morass of this debate, that there is only one issue raised by this amendment as modified, and that is if Snowe-Jeffords were found to be unconstitutional by a Court at a later time, do we want the soft money ban and the raising of the hard money limits to stand? That is the simple question raised by this amendment.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.46667
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.46667
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.93827
VADER
-0.722
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0980664394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0210032435
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0106806052
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.004061115
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0022391749
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0009537202
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002498984
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002008424
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.39128E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.67365E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.6071E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
26
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
John Edwards
Now I don't believe a Court will find Snowe-Jeffords to be unconstitutional. But the U.S. Supreme Court has done many things in the past that I didn't expect, including some things in recent times. So I have no way of predicting with certainty what the Court will do when confronted with this question. I do believe Snowe-Jeffords meets the constitutional requirements. So the argument that is made is, if Snowe-Jeffords is found to be unconstitutional, we create a strategic imbalance in our electoral process.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.19722
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.164
Leans Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.4897818901
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0142242381
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0025882508
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002114072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001686055
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.54897E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.10444E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
4.5963E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.85843E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.3201E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.2293E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.3
Gunning-Fog Score
10.5
Coleman-Liau Index
11.8
SMOG Index
10.7
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
John Edwards
The difference I have with my friends from Kentucky and from Louisiana is why we are enacting campaign finance reform. I don't think that the focus of campaign finance reform, and the reason we are doing it, is to make sure the strategic balance that now exists is maintained. I think what we are trying to do is take these huge, unregulated soft money contributions out of the system. What we are trying to do is restore public faith in our campaign and election system in this country.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
0.893
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1320629846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0393698865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0213394596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.002156669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0015752337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000369448
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.93207E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.85793E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.54546E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.027E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.408E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.5
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
John Edwards
It is difficult for me to understand how removing these huge soft money contributions doesn't contribute to the restoring of that integrity. It obviously does. It may be that if one of these provisions -- I think the only one in play is Snowe-Jeffords -- is found to be unconstitutional, somewhere down the road there is a strategic imbalance. That may be true. But this debate and this law is not about us. It is not about what is good for Democrats, it is not about what is good for Republicans, and it is not about what is good for incumbent Senators; it is about the American people. It is about whether their voice is going to be heard and whether they believe they have some ownership in their Government; or, instead, whether we continue to perpetuate a system where huge amounts of money flow, unregulated, into the campaign process and ordinary people feel as if their vote makes no difference anymore. Senator Dodd made an eloquent and passionate presentation yesterday, or the day before, on this very subject.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.46667
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.93827
VADER
0.964
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0823982118
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0099673649
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0054974345
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.003475439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.00257672
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002219178
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0001060673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
6.32234E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.92985E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.20767E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.8193E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
37
Sprache Difficult Word Count
45
John Edwards
My point is this: The disagreement I have with my colleague from Kentucky -- and it is a fundamental disagreement -- is why we are trying to enact campaign finance reform. I don't think we ought to be focused on ourselves, or focused on how we are going to combat a particular ad that may or may not be run against us. I am as practical as anybody else. I understand the way the system works. All of us have lived with it. But the baseline for this debate, and what I hope all of my colleagues will use as their touchstone, is not what is good for us, not what is good for Republicans, not what is good for Democrats, but what is good for the American people.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.07692
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.1431
VADER
0.627
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1930885483
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0212937884
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.019557921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0022551145
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0010187053
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009985846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.85295E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.38041E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.42699E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.8315E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0018E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.9
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
8.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
John Edwards
I have great respect for all of my Senate colleagues, including the Senators who have authored this amendment, who I know are well intentioned, and I don't doubt that. I just think we have a fundamental difference.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.42857
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.78846
VADER
0.867
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1466547721
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1447652699
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0429128297
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.014865183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0087057553
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011989965
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0009411074
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007683328
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002464752
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002109546
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.00011817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.3
Gunning-Fog Score
13.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
John Breaux
Will my colleague yield for a question?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.037967274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0341370673
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0177997499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0121543155
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0090058551
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.005014148
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0020201367
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.001225523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0009028846
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003592819
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.02701E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
91
Gunning-Fog Score
2.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
John Edwards
I will yield for a question now.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.4532061517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0399769691
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0294341909
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0126563114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008478602
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0003698982
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002159245
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.41803E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.7408E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.0609E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7067E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.8
Coleman-Liau Index
5.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
John Breaux
I take it the Senator from North Carolina, who supports Snowe-Jeffords, which would prohibit all these groups on this chart from using corporate dollars to attack candidates -- these single-issue special interest groups -- is that not an important amendment, that if it were to be declared unconstitutional, the rest of the bill would go into effect? Does this not bother the Senator that without the Snowe- Jeffords amendment all of these groups would be able to continue to use corporate dollars to attack candidates with no ability for the parties to defend them?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.02165
VADER
0.603
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.1555284951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1393788261
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0263614056
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0061507555
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0056886696
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011251954
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000836049
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0006518034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0001697476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.04971E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.95788E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
24.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
John Edwards
My answer to that question is, first, what we do, even without Snowe-Jeffords, is we prohibit candidates for political office from raising large soft dollar contributions for these very groups to which the Senator from Louisiana is referring.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0090799098
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0065230764
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0038802496
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014322772
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006855801
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001682537
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
8.25688E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
7.09689E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.17812E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.37361E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
21.9
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
John Edwards
If our focus is on restoring integrity to the process and the public's perception of ourselves, then getting us out of the process of raising soft money dollars, getting soft money, period, out of the system is a positive thing. And my view is that it helps restore integrity.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.45455
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8873
VADER
0.93
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1083997544
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0211688865
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0200940354
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0038522357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0026062698
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0025427988
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0019100571
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000209604
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.00079E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.5565E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.15E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
John Breaux
Does the Senator think that the Health Insurance Association of America, or the National Rifle Association really needs any help from Members of Congress in raising corporate money to run those types of ads? My point is that those groups don't need Members of Congress to help them raise money to do the Flo ads, and the Harry and Louise ads. Those are corporate dollars. The pharmacy industry doesn't need Members of Congress to raise money to pay for ads attacking everybody in Congress.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.125
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.125
Leans Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.23639
VADER
0.317
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.4601612687
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1793481992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1425444614
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0194062668
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0193566288
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0094706957
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.003285785
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0020290337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0011885591
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.04716E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.9818E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
John Edwards
Mr. President, reclaiming my time, my answer is the very answer I just gave the Senator from Louisiana. We can't stop these entities from running ads. What we can do, is stop Members of Congress from raising huge amounts of money and creating a public perception that we are involved in what is wrong with the system. You are absolutely right. As a matter of pure strategic balance, that there is the possibility there will be a strategic imbalance, I would not argue for a minute about that. But that is not what campaign finance reform is about.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.091
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
2.1855330095
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
1.8411263824
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.735844858
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.2991022542
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.2015152248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0942387036
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0786806631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0721352757
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0183259079
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0007390861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.58996E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
10.1
Automated Readability Index
6.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
28
John Edwards
What campaign finance reform is about is restoring integrity to the system and causing the American people to believe, once again, that the system has integrity, that it works, and this democracy belongs to them, and that it is their Government. That is the fundamental difference. Anything we do, I strongly suspect, with or without Snowe- Jeffords, or any of these other provisions, as we have learned from experience, may turn out a year, 5 years, 10 years from now to create some result that we don't expect. I think that is just realistic.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0.51083
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.4
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.76214
VADER
0.813
Very Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1509592519
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0857668114
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0599249674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0130253087
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0025995554
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024911365
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0010348627
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0006911437
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0003625916
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.86724E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.34683E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
John Edwards
But the one thing we know for certain is that the public believes this system is awash in money. These huge, unregulated contributions that are being made to political campaigns are wrong, and we need to make a clear and unequivocal statement that we will not allow that to happen.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.95551
VADER
0.389
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0702776248
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0297548249
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0179047085
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0076498807
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0058424492
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0047840331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0020727844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0010732292
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0001874144
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.51447E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.81576E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
54.6
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
John Edwards
This debate is not about us. It is about the American people. I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
13.2058486342
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.8287952282
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.2346536843
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.1583129517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0957521552
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0508716505
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.000384828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.17919E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.34531E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
1.16924E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.9288E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.8
Gunning-Fog Score
2.1
Coleman-Liau Index
7
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1902540331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1305765822
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1251674839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0097261
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0058287598
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017410928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0012023583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000691968
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0005256498
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
6.27035E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.74823E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, I will take a couple of minutes, if I may. I think the Senator from North Carolina has eloquently framed what the present amendment would do and what the consequences are, should the Frist-Breaux amendment be adopted -- and I am not sure it has been offered yet -- even if you accept the modification that is about to be offered by our friend and colleague from Louisiana. This gets a little confusing. It is hard for people to even hear -- despite the fact we live in this world -- and to even understand the issues of severability, nonseverability, hard money, and soft money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.22378
VADER
0.456
Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.5260258447
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1719008782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.1290863613
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0394195318
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0024212823
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014829639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005259958
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001225871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.04353E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.32541E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.04519E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.1
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Chris Dodd
This can glaze over the eyes of even the most determined person to follow this debate. It is confusing, but it is very important.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.455
Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.5265380256
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2074794844
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0268594187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0195720786
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0119949094
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0014883151
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
6.32417E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
5.73695E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
5.425E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.89761E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.8501E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Chris Dodd
Let me try, if I can, to frame this so people may have a clear understanding, at least as I understand it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.382
Somewhat Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0680079102
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0295814651
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0282663706
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0092979717
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0018142375
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0002764039
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.46464E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
7.51806E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.84567E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
8.1639E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.566E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Chris Dodd
If Snowe-Jeffords -- the union and corporate disclosure provisions; I will call that Snowe-Jeffords although they are often in different places -- if that falls because it is ruled to be unconstitutional, then the ban on soft money also falls.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.557
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0056213637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0036896097
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0016008915
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0012637799
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0009577068
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004109871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002884896
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
7.09949E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.77599E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.63555E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.9953E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
28.8
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Chris Dodd
If the Breaux amendment modifies the Frist amendment, then so would, as I understand it, the Thompson-Feinstein amendment, which allowed for the increases in hard money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.030959674
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.030229392
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0183440206
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0035997084
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006072263
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004047462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002900433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001167428
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0001090784
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
7.2975E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.016E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
41.6
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Chris Dodd
With all due respect to my friend from Tennessee, who is also opposing this amendment -- not the author of the amendment but the opponent of the amendment -- and my friend from California, Senator Feinstein, Thompson-Feinstein is not a reform. Thompson-Feinstein was the price we paid to have the votes together on the banning of soft money.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.33647
VADER
0.815
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0556771993
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0046211047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.003472931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025774869
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001081854
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00017066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001195782
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.59204E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.2702E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.2149E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.445E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.6
Gunning-Fog Score
15.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.8
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Chris Dodd
There is no illusion about this. That was not a reform. I know they want to call it that. I reluctantly voted for it, having spoken against the increases in hard money. My friend from Wisconsin and my friend from Arizona also took similar positions that they did not endorse or support those increases except that it was necessary to keep the votes together for the two reforms in this bill: Snowe-Jeffords, disclosure elements, and the ban on soft money. Those are the only two reforms in this bill.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
-0.197
Leans Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0558930682
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0256205676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0172020227
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0051327796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0032182452
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0020455675
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0017175478
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0013457488
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0011202391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0005972629
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.19792E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
11
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Chris Dodd
Thompson-Feinstein is the price we paid for those two reforms politically. I will stand corrected if someone wants to tell me I am wrong.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.5
Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.8473
VADER
-0.477
Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0400301855
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0358074962
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0212991697
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0078091594
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0039045146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0013448303
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008980207
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005737072
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000464905
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.98922E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
9.2882E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
72.3
Gunning-Fog Score
9.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Chris Dodd
Basically that is the deal. We have this increase in hard money, which I have a hard time accepting, but in exchange for that we get the two reforms of getting rid of unregulated money and the Snowe-Jeffords provisions. I believe, based on those who know far more about this than I do, Snowe-Jeffords should not fall for constitutional reasons, although my friend and colleague from North Carolina properly points out that we have been surprised lately by Supreme Court decisions where experts have told us they would rule one way and they ruled another.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.27273
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.918
Very Positive
Moderation
Sexual
0.0252643251
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0139586817
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0122584432
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0121968449
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0047825233
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017305945
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0015641639
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0007487837
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004259246
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
8.86067E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.47602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
26
Chris Dodd
I urge my colleagues to keep this in mind, that if, in fact, they have been a supporter of McCain-Feingold, understanding that this is not every reform of the process, and understanding there may be some imbalances created here -- we are all very much aware of this. My colleague from Utah spoke eloquently about the fact that none of us can say with any certainty exactly where all of this is going to end up. If you took McCain-Feingold as modified up to now and it became the law of the land tomorrow, there is some uncertainty, except this: The certainty that soft money, the unregulated millions of dollars -- billions of dollars now have been pouring into campaigns -- is going to be stopped.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
3.04452
VADER
0.202
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0733651861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0533465296
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0412146765
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0191548344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0110279529
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0054159882
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0029628776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0005958446
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004836239
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002880525
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.22569E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Chris Dodd
No one is suggesting the ban on soft money is unconstitutional, and that would be a major achievement. We may end up coming back at some future date, less than 30 years down the road, because we discover there have been unintended consequences in this legislation. Let's not lose sight of the fact that the ban on soft money and the Snowe- Jeffords provisions -- assuming they survive -- are worthy of this body's support. The issue of saying they both fall, the ban on soft money and the price we paid for it, as well, if Snowe-Jeffords falls is an unequal trade off. I urge my colleagues to reject it.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.71429
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.46634
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
-0.912
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0251308491
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0098903904
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0080060592
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0070199421
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0028442924
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0010834522
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0004972992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0004720992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0003998191
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.91172E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.8836E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
9.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
27
Sprache Difficult Word Count
29
Chris Dodd
Lastly, I say to my friend from Kentucky, there are differences of opinion on how we voted on two previous campaign finance reform bills. There was tied severability in those two other bills. It was not nonseverability. We linked two provisions. We said if one fell, then the other would fall as well.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.60944
VADER
0.649
Very Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0338288228
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0194231499
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.014492331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0130560977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0022309707
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012014129
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0006547439
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.43103E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.90926E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.3229E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.445E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Chris Dodd
It was, if you will, a partial severability in those two bills for which 23 of us, who are still here, voted. We did not vote for nonseverability. That is a semantical game in a sense. We voted for tied severability, partial severability. That is a side question.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0491418468
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0242389928
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0168797371
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0048039888
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0044547396
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0035753361
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0015711634
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008375237
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002963141
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.40094E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.09958E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.4
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Chris Dodd
The basic issue is my colleagues ought to, with all due respect, reject the Frist-Breaux amendment if they believe, as I think a majority of us do, that the ban on soft money and Snowe-Jeffords are truly reforms. We fought too long and too hard not to succeed with those and to link severability is a mistake.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.5
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.8473
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.25
Slightly Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.45199
VADER
-0.722
Very Negative
Moderation
Violence
0.0066582477
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0028954923
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019703119
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004330183
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001686076
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001261047
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
4.69407E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.78156E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.9229E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.9521E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.9062E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.9
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Chris Dodd
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0418671523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0250984973
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.007132897
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0054427201
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016113267
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007426336
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0006642077
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.000661776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0006352034
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
8.11231E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.44308E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
0.0523465744
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0249217061
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0062489686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.005570344
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0020918502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0005935476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002065174
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
9.16848E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.64526E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.0728E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.7478E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
22
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, listening carefully to the Senator from Connecticut trying to explain the previous nonseverability clauses that passed in 1992 and 1993, those nonseverability clauses included the whole bill, so that if any little portion of the bill that cleared the Senate in 1990, cleared the Senate in 1992, cleared the Senate in 1993, if any little portion of that bill was unconstitutional, the whole bill fell.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.6
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0014184625
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0004522654
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0001109981
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
4.81798E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
3.40103E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
2.7601E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.4366E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
1.0346E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.615E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.87E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
6.7E-9
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Mitch McConnell
As I understand the amendment of the Senator from Tennessee and the Senator from Louisiana, the whole bill does not fall. It carefully tied the two relevant parts of the amendment, the Snowe-Jeffords language and the party soft money ban. The Senator from Louisiana has pointed out why those two are relevant and important. He has his whole list of people who are going to be attacking our candidates, and our parties are going to have no funds -- none, none -- to protect them from attack from outside groups.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.63599
VADER
-0.744
Very Negative
Moderation
Harassment
0.1607882208
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0124777871
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0102375583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0062303676
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0030700176
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008779992
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0008203187
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
9.23457E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
2.44165E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.837E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
4.49E-8
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.8
Gunning-Fog Score
12.9
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
11.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Mitch McConnell
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.1906548394
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0095528623
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0091990994
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0024681211
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0011265107
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0008888146
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000773893
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0007322352
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0006393476
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002207337
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.14569E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
John Breaux
Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. President.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.5066065583
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1645699376
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0151398955
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0115458104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0031409192
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.002621388
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0008172166
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0007825391
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0007077333
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.000249111
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.53645E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.2255702158
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.023208106
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0141824028
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0082133643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0045539527
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0045458517
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0027502101
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0022177044
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0021891898
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0009801861
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001320357
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
9.9
Gunning-Fog Score
1.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
John Breaux
I ask the Presiding Officer whether it would be appropriate for me now -- I have two requests. First, would it be appropriate for me to now ask unanimous consent for a modification to the Frist-Breaux amendment?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.1105054398
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.1043087803
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0205448538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0049120663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0041502433
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0033860124
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0019225663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.0015579753
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0003765921
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002277316
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
2.40034E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
12.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.104083796
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0486757839
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0234567502
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0045920104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0017794564
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0016795739
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0014403806
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
5.20044E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.40206E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
6.0232E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.573E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.1
Gunning-Fog Score
7.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
John Breaux
Further parliamentary inquiry: If there is an objection to the unanimous consent request to modify the Frist-Breaux amendment, would it not be in order at a later date to reoffer a Frist-Breaux amendment with that modification?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Harassment
0.0881472195
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0419275631
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.023205363
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0135393304
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0030709019
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0022818616
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
3.64809E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.44284E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7786E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
1.80907E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.06654E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
19.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0190725317
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0031181029
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.002506851
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.001901894
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0008807549
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0002027482
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0001628013
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001257887
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.24727E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
3.41837E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.7448E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
55.1
Gunning-Fog Score
5.8
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
4.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
John Breaux
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the modification to the Frist-Breaux amendment that is pending at the desk be offered.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.226
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.011266709
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029232313
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0026986849
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0002830868
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0002467523
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.000119042
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
9.64343E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
4.58635E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
2.35849E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.5588E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.386E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
6.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.7
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
10
Fred Thompson
Reserving the right to object.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Harassment
3.1649623066
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.2232878702
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0646809931
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0386517291
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0171384978
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0011978331
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.00056977
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0005001686
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0002454274
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
5.91174E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.51417E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1640629722
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.1465541776
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0475999434
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0178464659
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0173137538
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0125358798
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.009218436
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
0.0049951723
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0003376279
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
0.000218643
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001765774
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
34.6
Gunning-Fog Score
7.9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
7.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Fred Thompson
Reserving the right to object, and I do intend to object, I know my friend can bring this after -- if this amendment survives a motion to table, of course, he can bring it back, or I suppose he can bring it back separately. My understanding is this amendment would cause the following result; that is, if either Snowe- Jeffords or the soft money portion of the bill were struck down, then the Thompson-Feinstein amendment language would fall also at that time. For that reason, I object.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.94444
VADER
0.296
Slightly Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0497338653
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0237376225
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0143627942
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0056013669
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0040981951
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0012539487
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0003261566
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
4.09944E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
3.33045E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
5.7121E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.928E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.4
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Russ Feingold
Will the Senator withhold his objection?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Sexual
0.005827198
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.002678399
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0008309205
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0006109637
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.000200742
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0001183018
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
5.09383E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
1.54705E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
1.05127E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.8416E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
3.452E-7
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
45.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
8.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Fred Thompson
Yes.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Moderation
Violence
0.0222705596
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0197191985
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0055736062
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0012283652
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0010283736
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0004638152
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0004252963
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0002465714
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
3.75248E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
2.83628E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
2.77602E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
The Presiding Officer
The PRESIDING OFFICER.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.0146361635
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0137246359
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0025229727
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0019847841
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000726235
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
0.0002450378
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0001777037
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
4.77153E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
4.35059E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
8.5205E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
1.7598E-6
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
47.4
Gunning-Fog Score
2.2
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
6.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Mr. FEINGOLD addressed the Chair.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence > Graphic
0.0521508045
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence
0.0275719853
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment
0.0137103663
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate
0.0080414778
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0029472149
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.000874828
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual > Minors
0.0003044104
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Hate > Threatening
0.0002402379
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm
9.98597E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Instructions
7.36662E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Self-Harm > Intent
2.46892E-5
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.6
Sprache Readability Score
1.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
John Breaux
I yield.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Moderation
Violence
0.1204320812
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Violence > Graphic
0.0161624223
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Harassment > Threatening
0.0056252462
OpenAI Moderation v1 (007)
Sexual
0.0025685968