Fact
ba
.
se
Donald J. Trump
Press Briefing: Members of the House Freedom Caucus Speak to Reporters - March 5, 2025
StressLens
4 Topics
9 Entities
Moderation
4 Speakers
Topics
Entities
agenda
CR
cuts
Donald Trump
Elon Musk
people
reconciliation
spending
United States
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Chip Roy Chip Roy said 44 sentences of a total of 112 sentences.
40%
Chip Roy said 688 words of a total of 1600 words.
43%
Chip Roy talked 200 seconds of a total of 471 seconds.
43%
Andy Harris Andy Harris said 26 sentences of a total of 112 sentences.
24%
Andy Harris said 282 words of a total of 1600 words.
18%
Andy Harris talked 79 seconds of a total of 471 seconds.
17%
Lauren Boebert Lauren Boebert said 7 sentences of a total of 112 sentences.
7%
Lauren Boebert said 193 words of a total of 1600 words.
13%
Lauren Boebert talked 60 seconds of a total of 471 seconds.
13%
Question Question said 15 sentences of a total of 112 sentences.
14%
Question said 166 words of a total of 1600 words.
11%
Question talked 53 seconds of a total of 471 seconds.
12%
Full Transcript
Andy Harris
00:00:00-00:00:18 (18 sec)No Signal (0)
Thank you very much everybody. Uh, look, we had a great meeting with the president. Uh, you know the, uh, group of conservatives in the office with him all want to support the president's agenda. And we're going to work toward getting that continuing resolution in a form where we can pass it just like we did last week.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.8
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.84583
VADER
0.902
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.7
Gunning-Fog Score
9.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.2
SMOG Index
9.7
Automated Readability Index
6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
3.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
11
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Andy Harris
00:00:18-00:00:29 (11 sec)No Signal (0)
To all the people who said, you could never pass that reconciliation bill with only Republican votes, wait until next week. We get -- we get another chance with the -- with the year-long CR. Chip?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
34.211
Magnitude:
36
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.528
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.6
Gunning-Fog Score
7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.4
Sprache Readability Score
2.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Chip Roy
00:00:29-00:00:47 (19 sec)No Signal (0)
Oh, sorry. Had a great meeting with the president and, uh, some of our like-minded conservatives in the Freedom Caucus and out. Uh, there is overwhelming support to back the president's agenda to be able to advance, uh, and be able to give room for Elon Musk and DOGE and give room for Russ Vought at OMB to deliver to the American people.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.66667
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.43508
VADER
0.893
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.503
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.2
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Chip Roy
00:00:47-00:01:05 (18 sec)No Signal (0)
And, uh, finding and recognizing the cuts that need to occur, identify those, get those in place as we debate appropriations heading into the FY 2026 season. But importantly, freeze spending at current levels. Uh, which is going to be able to make sure that we hold spending in check while we identify those cuts.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.42857
Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.78846
VADER
0.103
Leans Positive
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
87.647
Magnitude:
54
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.6
Gunning-Fog Score
11
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
8.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Chip Roy
00:01:05-00:01:39 (34 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, which keep coming out day by day, week by week. We're identifying more waste, fraud and abuse. The absurdity of expenditures like a $32,000 transgender comic book in Peru. The American people are scratching their heads saying what's going on? We'll identify that stuff. Let Elon and Russ do their job, support what the president's agenda is to guarantee that we are able to, uh, reduce spending while making sure we can create the room for economic prosperity that we're doing in the reconciliation plan as Andy Harris just referred to, getting cuts in place, making sure the tax policy is extended and making sure we can deliver for the American people.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.6
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.2
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.38566
VADER
-0.088
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
91.892
Magnitude:
112
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.653
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.586
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Science and Technology > Social Sciences > Economics
Score:
0.536
Code:
20000745
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000745
Wikidata_id:
Q8134
Wikidata_label:
economics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government Policy > Economic Policy
Score:
0.521
Code:
20000345
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000345
Wikidata_id:
Q582577
Wikidata_label:
economic policy
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
58.4
Gunning-Fog Score
12.2
Coleman-Liau Index
11.1
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
33
Sprache Difficult Word Count
41
Chip Roy
00:01:39-00:01:48 (8 sec)No Signal (0)
So, good meeting, we're ready to advance the ball next week and, uh, move this agenda forward.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.687
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.1
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Unidentified
00:01:48-00:02:11 (23 sec)No Signal (0)
Just like my colleagues said, we had a great meeting with the president. And the important thing is, is that the agenda that America voted for is not going to be slowed down. Our colleagues on the other side of the aisle are literally hoping and praying for a shutdown to stop the momentum of what the president's agenda is and what the American agenda is. We had a great conversation with the president about how we're going to keep the ball moving forward.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.2
Slightly Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.33647
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.83321
VADER
0.939
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
76.067
Magnitude:
84
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61.6
Gunning-Fog Score
12.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Unidentified
00:02:11-00:02:36 (25 sec)No Signal (0)
Like Chip says, make sure that we hold spending flat, keep identifying the waste, fraud and abuse in government and then tee up what's next, which is -- which is reconciliation. So, like the chairman said, we've been told before that we can't do it. We've got the slimmest majority ever and it is the people in the Freedom Caucus that are providing the margin, which gets us to victory and we're prepared to do it again.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.16667
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.31015
VADER
0.218
Slightly Positive
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
74.508
Magnitude:
77
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64.2
Gunning-Fog Score
13.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
11.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Lauren Boebert
00:02:36-00:02:57 (22 sec)No Signal (0)
We're here to support President Trump's agenda and the only reason that the American people still have hope in Washington DC is because President Trump won in a landslide November 5 and he was delivered a mandate by the American people. And so, we are here to move this forward, to pass the CR, to give them the funding, as my colleagues in the Freedom Caucus have said, uh, to -- to advance his agenda.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.70805
VADER
0.926
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
60.92
Magnitude:
74
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.661
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.587
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Heads of State
Score:
0.532
Code:
20000610
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000610
Wikidata_id:
Q48352
Wikidata_label:
head of state
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
48.1
Gunning-Fog Score
17
Coleman-Liau Index
9.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Lauren Boebert
00:02:57-00:03:31 (34 sec)No Signal (0)
We are going to continue with the DOGE, uh -- with the DOGE cuts and continue to identify that waste, fraud, and abuse, the theft of American tax dollars, and protect the interests of the American tax people. And, uh, we're happy and honored to be here with the president. Uh, it was great for him to welcome us, uh, in this conversation to have us a part of that dialog so we can deliver, uh, for America and ensure that we are not doing things the way they've always been done in Washington DC.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-0.14286
Leans Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-0.25131
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.125
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.23639
VADER
0.832
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
67.231
Magnitude:
95
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
20.256
Magnitude:
95
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Crime
Score:
0.618
Code:
20000082
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000082
Wikidata_id:
Q83267
Wikidata_label:
crime
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Crime > Corporate Crime > Embezzlement
Score:
0.546
Code:
20000090
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000090
Wikidata_id:
Q157833
Wikidata_label:
embezzlement
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
57.1
Gunning-Fog Score
15.5
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
28
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Question
00:03:31-00:03:39 (8 sec)No Signal (0)
Did the president ask you for any money for his immigration agenda? And if so, how much? What would it go for?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Topics
Topic:
Immigration
Score:
88.912
Magnitude:
22
Code:
9
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#9
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
84
Gunning-Fog Score
6.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
0.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Chip Roy
00:03:39-00:04:02 (23 sec)No Signal (0)
So, of course, we talked about the need to, uh, have resources at the border. Uh, Tom Homan is working really hard. I mean, look, we've gotten those numbers down to 200 a day, 6,000 a month. Under President Biden, we we're having 6,000 a day, 10,000 a day. So, we need to make sure they've got the resources necessary for ICE, for beds, uh, to be able to deliver and get on with removals and repatriations while they're carrying out the president's agenda there.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.162
Leans Positive
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
75.309
Magnitude:
81
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10.7
Coleman-Liau Index
6.6
SMOG Index
10.5
Automated Readability Index
5.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.5
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
23
Chip Roy
00:04:02-00:04:22 (19 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, but obviously, what we're talking about here, and we're talking about the, uh, government funding that's expiring next Friday, all we're talking about, to be very clear, is freezing spending at current levels, uh, for the remainder of this fiscal year because we're already in appropriations seasons for FY 2026. And remember that Congress appropriates, which means we put a ceiling.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.94591
VADER
0.413
Positive
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
70.803
Magnitude:
61
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.682
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Government Budget
Score:
0.618
Code:
20000607
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000607
Wikidata_id:
Q271855
Wikidata_label:
government budget
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.609
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
40.3
Gunning-Fog Score
17.6
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Chip Roy
00:04:22-00:04:39 (17 sec)No Signal (0)
Uh, the president can't spend over that number. But the president can use impoundment, use the power of the executive branch as the chief executive to spend what he thinks is appropriate for on behalf of the taxpayer. We believe that. We believe he's got that power. We support that power. We support Russ Vought using that power.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.55556
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.691
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
56.093
Magnitude:
58
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
30.208
Magnitude:
58
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
73
Gunning-Fog Score
7.3
Coleman-Liau Index
10.9
SMOG Index
8.5
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Lauren Boebert
00:04:39-00:04:43 (4 sec)No Signal (0)
So, we want to make sure that we're giving him room to do what the American people ask him to do.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.646
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
58.066
Magnitude:
21
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.4
Coleman-Liau Index
4.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Question
00:04:43-00:04:51 (8 sec)No Signal (0)
The entire House tax cuts, do you think you are on the same page with the president when it comes to making tax cuts permanent?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.60944
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.58779
VADER
-0.527
Very Negative
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
94.134
Magnitude:
25
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
79.9
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Unidentified
00:04:51-00:04:57 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
We are on the same page with making tax cuts permanent. Were also on the same page with the president of balancing the budget.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-0.33333
Somewhat Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-0.51083
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
93.853
Magnitude:
24
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.55
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
81.9
Gunning-Fog Score
8.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
7
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
1.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0
Sprache Readability Score
0.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Question
00:04:58-00:05:02 (4 sec)No StressLens
And do you think that both chambers are on the same page?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.3
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Unidentified
00:05:02-00:05:20 (18 sec)No Signal (0)
Well, they're going to get on the same page. The Senate obviously has their product. We've passed ours out. There's going to be a negotiation and a discussion. There'll probably be some give and take, but we're generally pleased with the -- the direction that it's headed. We'd like it to be a little more speedy, but, uh, you know, we're not the only ones in this -- in this conversation.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.77778
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.7346
VADER
0.825
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
37.066
Magnitude:
71
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8.7
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
9.4
Automated Readability Index
4.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Chip Roy
00:05:20-00:05:38 (18 sec)No Signal (0)
And understand the importance of what the House did last week when we passed the budget, which had $2 trillion of spending restraint combined with the tax policy. Obviously we got to go in line with the Senate. The president of the United States in the House chamber last night said that one of his key priorities is balancing the budget of the United States.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.33333
Somewhat Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.51083
VADER
0.796
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
92.39
Magnitude:
64
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.69
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Government Budget
Score:
0.649
Code:
20000607
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000607
Wikidata_id:
Q271855
Wikidata_label:
government budget
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.616
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Economy > Macro Economics > Budgets and Budgeting
Score:
0.506
Code:
20000348
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000348
Wikidata_id:
Q41263
Wikidata_label:
budget
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Heads of State
Score:
0.5
Code:
20000610
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000610
Wikidata_id:
Q48352
Wikidata_label:
head of state
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
65.1
Gunning-Fog Score
13
Coleman-Liau Index
10.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Chip Roy
00:05:38-00:05:59 (21 sec)No Signal (0)
To do that, we're going to have to have the Senate work with us, get those spending -- the spending restraint, uh, and put that in combination with the tax policy necessary for the economic growth to also deliver. Remember in our House budget, economic growth was a key part of that, but what was really important was tying the spending restraint to the economic growth to deliver on the tax policy.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
0.822
Very Positive
Topics
Topic:
Macroeconomics
Score:
94.379
Magnitude:
72
Code:
1
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#1
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.667
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.596
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government Policy > Economic Policy
Score:
0.57
Code:
20000345
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000345
Wikidata_id:
Q582577
Wikidata_label:
economic policy
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Government Budget
Score:
0.557
Code:
20000607
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000607
Wikidata_id:
Q271855
Wikidata_label:
government budget
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Economy
Score:
0.553
Code:
20000344
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000344
Wikidata_id:
Q159810
Wikidata_label:
economy
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Science and Technology > Social Sciences > Economics
Score:
0.536
Code:
20000745
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000745
Wikidata_id:
Q8134
Wikidata_label:
economics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Economy, Business and Finance > Economy > Macro Economics > Economic Growth
Score:
0.514
Code:
20000357
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000357
Wikidata_id:
Q189833
Wikidata_label:
economic growth
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.1
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
22
Sprache Difficult Word Count
16
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Question
00:05:59-00:06:20 (21 sec)No Signal (0)
In this meeting here today -- You just saw Elon Musk on Capitol Hill meeting with Senators, having lunch with them. So, you reported that he even gave out his personal phone number to some of the Senators there. I'm curious if that has been the case with any of you? I know there's a meeting later this evening, but has Elon Musk directly communicated with y'all specifically?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
2.3979
VADER
0.287
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
61
Gunning-Fog Score
10.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Andy Harris
00:06:20-00:06:37 (16 sec)No Signal (0)
Well, he will, as you say, he will have a meeting with the House conference this evening, the House Republican Conference, this evening. And look, we're going to find out -- we're going to find out a lot of new things because he's been out there. He's been -- he's been rooting out the fraud, waste and abuse that we all thought was there --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.94591
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.14286
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.25131
VADER
-0.866
Very Negative
Topics
Topic:
Law and Crime
Score:
68.103
Magnitude:
65
Code:
12
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#12
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
23.986
Magnitude:
65
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.513
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.8
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
10.6
Automated Readability Index
8.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
6
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
-0.296
Slightly Negative
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
4.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
4.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
0.3
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Andy Harris
00:06:39-00:06:43 (4 sec)No Signal (0)
-- but nobody had brought it to light. He's brought it to light. We look forward to hearing what he has to say this evening.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
93
Gunning-Fog Score
6.5
Coleman-Liau Index
7.2
SMOG Index
7.9
Automated Readability Index
1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.4
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Chip Roy
00:06:43-00:06:48 (4 sec)No Signal (0)
And yes. And yes, we've met with Elon and yes, um, we engage with DOGE.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.859
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
3
Coleman-Liau Index
4.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Question
00:06:50-00:06:57 (6 sec)No StressLens
Did President Trump ask you to support the [Inaudible]
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.402
Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
93
Gunning-Fog Score
3.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.9
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Andy Harris
00:06:57-00:07:02 (5 sec)No Signal (0)
Well, he asked it last week in a tweet. So, I'm sure he didn't change his mind before today.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.569
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.2
Gunning-Fog Score
3.8
Coleman-Liau Index
5.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.25
Slightly Positive
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
29.656
Magnitude:
9
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
75.5
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
10.3
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
1.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Question
00:07:05-00:07:07 (2 sec)No StressLens
Is the entire House Freedom Caucus on the same page with the --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
88.9
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.2
Sprache Readability Score
2.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Andy Harris
00:07:07-00:07:11 (4 sec)No Signal (0)
Well, look -- look, we have -- we haven't seen the final -- the final form of the CR --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.273
Slightly Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
90.1
Gunning-Fog Score
6.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
3.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.8
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2
Coleman-Liau Index
6.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Andy Harris
00:07:13-00:07:19 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
In concept, the president has said he needs this for his agenda. We support the president's agenda. So, assuming --
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0.402
Positive
Topics
Topic:
Government Operations
Score:
68.898
Magnitude:
20
Code:
20
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#20
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
71.3
Gunning-Fog Score
8.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
3.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
3.6
Coleman-Liau Index
3.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Andy Harris
00:07:20-00:07:32 (12 sec)No Signal (0)
-- that's right. I mean, again, uh, to those who said, we could not do it last week, we did it. I think we're going to get there. Are we there yet? Maybe not yet, but we -- but we have six days.
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
3.3
Coleman-Liau Index
3.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.8
Sprache Readability Score
1.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
Gunning-Fog Score
Coleman-Liau Index
SMOG Index
Automated Readability Index
Dale-Chall Readability Score
Sprache Readability Score
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
Sprache Difficult Word Count
Chip Roy
00:07:32-00:07:46 (14 sec)No Signal (0)
Now -- the question. The speaker has not yet released the text. So, until we see the text and we see what we're talking about with respect to anomalies for defense and for veterans, for all of the things that matter, we've got to read the bill. Shocking. I know that's shocking, that we want to see 72 hours to read a bill, right?
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-2.3979
Harvard-IV (Relative)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
0.11111
Leans Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
0.20067
VADER
-0.103
Leans Negative
Topics
Topic:
Defense
Score:
70.751
Magnitude:
63
Code:
16
Url:
https://fsc.al/cap-mc#16
Source:
Comparative Agendas
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.6
Gunning-Fog Score
7.6
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
8.4
Automated Readability Index
3.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
3.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
9
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0.361
Somewhat Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.8
Gunning-Fog Score
14.5
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
5.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.637
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.9
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.3
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.60944
VADER
0.612
Very Positive
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
0
Neutral
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
0
Harvard-IV (Relative)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
1
Very Positive
Harvard-IV (Logit)
1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Sentiment
Loughran McDonald (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Loughran McDonald (Logit)
-1.09861
Harvard-IV (Relative)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Absolute)
-1
Very Negative
Harvard-IV (Logit)
-1.09861
VADER
0
Neutral
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.9
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3