Fact
ba
.
se
Donald J. Trump
Press Briefing: Peter Navarro Speaks to Reporters Outside the White House - July 17, 2026
StressLens
3 Topics
9 Entities
Moderation
2 Speakers
Entities
briefing
citizen
election
election system
minds
Navarro
people
SAVE America Act
way
Moderation
No moderation found
Speakers
Peter Navarro Peter Navarro said 106 sentences of a total of 128 sentences.
83%
Peter Navarro said 1793 words of a total of 2066 words.
87%
Peter Navarro talked 802 seconds of a total of 903 seconds.
89%
Question Question said 22 sentences of a total of 128 sentences.
18%
Question said 273 words of a total of 2066 words.
14%
Question talked 101 seconds of a total of 903 seconds.
12%
Full Transcript
Question
00:00:00-00:00:03 (4 sec)No StressLens
Mr. Navarro, good, uh, good morning to you. A little smoky out here.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
2.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.3
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
6.8
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.1
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
62.8
Gunning-Fog Score
1.2
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Peter Navarro
00:00:05-00:00:27 (22 sec)No Signal (0)
I never -- I never smoked, except when Canada has wildfires. So anyway, uh, I'm going to -- what I like to do is make a relatively brief statement with some analytics in it, and then we'll ask a few questions. The topic's going to be, uh, simply what, uh, what was revealed last night, and the ensuing coverage.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Environment
Score:
0.6
Code:
6000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/06000000
Wikidata_id:
Q43619
Wikidata_label:
natural environment
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Health
Score:
0.536
Code:
7000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/07000000
Wikidata_id:
Q12147
Wikidata_label:
health
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Environment > Conservation
Score:
0.535
Code:
20000420
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000420
Wikidata_id:
Q628403
Wikidata_label:
conservation
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
68.8
Gunning-Fog Score
11.1
Coleman-Liau Index
8.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Peter Navarro
00:00:27-00:00:58 (31 sec)No Signal (0)
So, um what I want to start with is, is facts. There's a simple fact that the American people have lost a lot of confidence in our election system and there is a deep, deep, deep division on whether the 2020 election was stolen. That's not what last night was about. What last night was about is protecting future elections.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
74.6
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
8.8
SMOG Index
10.8
Automated Readability Index
5.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
3.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Peter Navarro
00:00:58-00:01:30 (32 sec)No Signal (0)
But the fact that there's such dissonance between some people who view that 2020 election as not stolen, some people do. And the question, I think the way to frame -- the way to think about this is based on what was released, and I'm going to go through that. Based on what was released, is the probability that that election was stolen higher today in people's minds than it was before we got the data?
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Science and Technology
Score:
0.67
Code:
13000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/13000000
Wikidata_id:
Q34104
Wikidata_label:
science and technology
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Science and Technology > Social Sciences > Psychology
Score:
0.536
Code:
20000753
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000753
Wikidata_id:
Q9418
Wikidata_label:
psychology
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
13.2
Coleman-Liau Index
8.7
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
15
Peter Navarro
00:01:30-00:02:10 (41 sec)No Signal (0)
And I would argue that, certainly, there's no question, whether you have a very low view of whether it was stolen, it's got to creep up a little bit because of what came out. If you have a high view, it's going to maybe pop to certainty, and everything in between. So if you look at what happened last night, you start with, uh, the, the China, uh, basically hacking, uh, our data systems in a way, uh, not just to buy our voter files, to tune of 120 million Americans, but also going into the metadata, which has more information than what you can buy commercially.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Science and Technology
Score:
0.654
Code:
13000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/13000000
Wikidata_id:
Q34104
Wikidata_label:
science and technology
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.6
Gunning-Fog Score
17.3
Coleman-Liau Index
8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
20
Sprache Difficult Word Count
25
Peter Navarro
00:02:10-00:02:44 (33 sec)No Signal (0)
Clearly, if you do that in anticipation of the 2020 election, you have malintent in terms of what you might do with that election. Um, so that should raise really deep concerns among the American people. It's not the first time this has kind of happened. What's different about what has happened here is that the press writ large, particularly on the left side, doesn't want anybody to be concerned about that.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.4
Gunning-Fog Score
11.6
Coleman-Liau Index
10.6
SMOG Index
11.8
Automated Readability Index
8.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
4.2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
14
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Peter Navarro
00:02:44-00:03:19 (35 sec)No Signal (0)
Um, when they really should be deeply concerned. The thing that is troubling to me, uh, is the presidential daily briefing -- I want to tell everybody in America how important that is to your safety and welfare. Every day, that's why they call it a daily briefing, the intelligence community comes in and provides its assessment of the issues of the day that should concern the president and what might require action.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
53.2
Gunning-Fog Score
14.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Peter Navarro
00:03:19-00:03:54 (35 sec)No Signal (0)
And we have revelations based on documents that have been released, that show that there was division among the intelligence community about whether or not the Chinese were influencing the election and were trying to steal the election or not, but we did not hear that division. There was one very chilling comment by an FBI agent who bragged about running a shadow government.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.613
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Law Enforcement
Score:
0.574
Code:
20000129
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000129
Wikidata_id:
Q44554
Wikidata_label:
law enforcement
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Espionage and Intelligence
Score:
0.536
Code:
20000605
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000605
Wikidata_id:
Q165950
Wikidata_label:
espionage
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.508
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.2
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
19
Sprache Difficult Word Count
20
Peter Navarro
00:03:54-00:04:32 (38 sec)No Signal (0)
OK? A shadow government, basically to keep key intelligence off the desk of the president. And what's interesting is left saying, well, we were actually in control of those agencies at the time, but the problem we always have with the deep state, which is exactly what it is, is that when you come in and have politicals in charge, you have people who are career bureaucrats underneath who really cause, uh, they have a lot of power to keep things from you and to do things they shouldn't do. So that's number two.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14.1
Coleman-Liau Index
9.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Peter Navarro
00:04:32-00:04:54 (22 sec)No Signal (0)
That should be deeply, deeply, deeply troubling to both sides of the aisle. The third issue is something that I never really addressed in my -- what I call the Navarro Report, which came out in 2020. It's on my website, Peternavarro.com. I urge everybody to look at it. I'll come back to it in in a minute.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
4.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
78.9
Gunning-Fog Score
5.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
8.5
Automated Readability Index
2.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
14
Peter Navarro
00:04:54-00:05:00 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
Um, I never really addressed the voting machine concern. That's been a concern of others.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
69.5
Gunning-Fog Score
5.7
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
4.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
2
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Question
00:05:00-00:05:33 (34 sec)No Signal (0)
Um, but what was released last night in the documents, um, indicates very clearly that voting machines not only are vulnerable to being used to sway elections, but they may well be undetectable when that kind of nefarious activity takes place. So that's a clear marker. And again, the, the dismissive remarks from the left are, well, that's all from Venezuela.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
11.3
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
50.3
Gunning-Fog Score
14
Coleman-Liau Index
11.9
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.4
Sprache Readability Score
4.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Peter Navarro
00:05:33-00:06:05 (32 sec)No Signal (0)
But that misses the key point that this is -- it's possible to use those machines to go in and turn an election. The fourth big reveal last night and, uh, Markwayne Mullin, our great Secretary of DHS, I think he's going to be across the street at 11:00. Um, close to 300,000 illegal voters were found by DHS.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Crime, Law and Justice > Law Enforcement
Score:
0.574
Code:
20000129
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000129
Wikidata_id:
Q44554
Wikidata_label:
law enforcement
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.559
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.4
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
6.4
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
6.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
12
Sprache Difficult Word Count
13
Peter Navarro
00:06:05-00:06:11 (5 sec)No StressLens
Now, uh, first of all, that was a small number of states.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
4.8
Coleman-Liau Index
4.8
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
1.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
1.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Peter Navarro
00:06:11-00:06:42 (31 sec)No Signal (0)
OK. And so there's that. Um, but when you look at how elections turn, particularly in the battleground states, um, it can come down to very small margins. For example, Georgia, 12,000 vote victory margin for Joe Biden. Now, when I did the Navarro report, when I focused on Georgia, I made the following observations.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.709
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.68
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Heads of State
Score:
0.542
Code:
20000610
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000610
Wikidata_id:
Q48352
Wikidata_label:
head of state
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
0.538
Code:
20000574
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000574
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
64
Gunning-Fog Score
10.2
Coleman-Liau Index
9.5
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.3
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
17
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Peter Navarro
00:06:42-00:07:22 (40 sec)No Signal (0)
One of the big changes that Georgia did was get rid of essentially, uh, signature verification for ballots. They got rid of signature verification. At the same time, they dramatically expanded the ability of people to vote absentee. So what you had was the number of rejected ballots by percent, falling from about five percent in 2016 election, uh, to virtually zero, OK. Virtually zero in the 2020 election.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
0.75
Code:
20000574
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000574
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.61
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Election > Voting
Score:
0.506
Code:
20000586
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000586
Wikidata_id:
Q189760
Wikidata_label:
voting
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.1
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
46.9
Gunning-Fog Score
13.6
Coleman-Liau Index
11.6
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
7.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
3.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
25
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Peter Navarro
00:07:22-00:07:55 (33 sec)No Signal (0)
OK? So there's a 12,000 vote victory margin we see for Biden but when you get rid of signature verification and you effectively almost double the amount of ballots absentee and two thirds or more, the ballots go for Joe Biden, what you wind up doing statistically is likely turning a 12,000 vote loss for Donald Trump into probably a 30,000 vote or more victory for Donald Trump.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.709
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.68
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
0.639
Code:
20000574
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000574
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > Heads of State
Score:
0.542
Code:
20000610
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000610
Wikidata_id:
Q48352
Wikidata_label:
head of state
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
52.8
Gunning-Fog Score
18.7
Coleman-Liau Index
8.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.4
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
21
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Peter Navarro
00:07:55-00:08:28 (32 sec)No Signal (0)
And that's just one state and that's how this happens. So my concern here the purpose of that last night was not to prove anything about the 2020 election, it was to -- it was basically to look forward of how we can fix things. But my concern here is that we've created a system where we don't have the appropriate checks, signature verification ID of the voters themselves.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.66
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66.9
Gunning-Fog Score
12.6
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.1
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Peter Navarro
00:08:28-00:09:05 (37 sec)No Signal (0)
At the same time that we've loosened absentee ballots up so much that it's easy to slip things in. I call it the grand stuff, the ballot box strategy. Again, I urge you to read the three volume, uh, Navarro report. And so we've got our work cut out for us. The president has proposed passage of the SAVE America Act, and it literally not only has support of 80 percent or more of the American people, it actually checks every box needed to ensure the integrity of our elections.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
0.645
Code:
20000574
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000574
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.587
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.5
Gunning-Fog Score
10.8
Coleman-Liau Index
8.6
SMOG Index
11.7
Automated Readability Index
7.1
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
23
Sprache Difficult Word Count
27
Peter Navarro
00:09:05-00:09:36 (31 sec)No Signal (0)
So what I would ask everybody in the media to do, which they didn't do before they filed their stories today, is actually read the data that's now up on whitehouse.gov. I mean, I'm astonished that reporters could go out and write authoritative stories, trashing, in many cases, what the president said last night, when they literally, unless they're the fastest reader in the world, didn't have the time to review the documents.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.5
Gunning-Fog Score
14.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.2
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Peter Navarro
00:09:36-00:09:44 (8 sec)No Signal (0)
So I thank you for letting me go on, and I'll take some questions. We'll start with, uh, with the pool carrier here, so yes, ma'am.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
92.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.3
Coleman-Liau Index
5.9
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.5
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.1
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Question
00:09:44-00:09:52 (8 sec)No Signal (0)
Thank you, Mr. Navarro. Um, do you foresee any sort of updates to our trade policy with China, given all these allegations on their interference?
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
6.5
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63
Gunning-Fog Score
9.7
Coleman-Liau Index
11.3
SMOG Index
9.9
Automated Readability Index
4.4
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
2.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Peter Navarro
00:09:52-00:10:28 (36 sec)No Signal (0)
No, I think they're, uh, they're separate lanes. China has already predictably denied everything, which you would expect. This story -- this isn't a story about China, it's about the American refusal at the political level to safeguard our election system and that happened because there are nefarious actors domestically who wanted that 2020 election to go in a different way than the voters did.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
38.5
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
22
Question
00:10:28-00:10:35 (7 sec)No Signal (0)
One follow up, one follow up. If that's the case, I mean, if China is trying to influence our elections, why would they not be punished for it?
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.8
Gunning-Fog Score
9.9
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
10.3
Automated Readability Index
3.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3
Sprache Readability Score
2.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Peter Navarro
00:10:35-00:11:01 (26 sec)No Signal (0)
That's a serious matter. It's not what I'm going to be talking about today. I'm sure there's going to be some discussions about that. But I think the focus needs to be on the fact that there's holes in our election system that can and will be exploited by bad actors, both foreign and domestic. And that's why the SAVE America Act is critical, uh, to the hinge here.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
77.6
Gunning-Fog Score
9
Coleman-Liau Index
8.3
SMOG Index
10
Automated Readability Index
4.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.8
Sprache Readability Score
3.7
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
17
Peter Navarro
00:11:01-00:11:11 (10 sec)No Signal (0)
I mean, it's, the most reasonable bill in the world. It's ID check. You can bring in an ID, check whether you're a citizen. I mean, come on? Uh, sir.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
99.2
Gunning-Fog Score
5.1
Coleman-Liau Index
5.2
SMOG Index
6.9
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
2.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
5
Sprache Difficult Word Count
9
Question
00:11:11-00:11:13 (2 sec)No StressLens
Yeah, thank you. You mentioned the SAVE America Act.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
80.1
Gunning-Fog Score
1.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
7.3
Automated Readability Index
2.3
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.5
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.4
Coleman-Liau Index
7.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
10
Sprache Readability Score
0.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
1
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Question
00:11:13-00:11:25 (12 sec)No Signal (0)
The president posted today on Truth Social, I'll quote it, great reviews on speech last night, big audience, pass the SAVE America Act. Does his speech last night get the SAVE America Act over the finish line in your opinion?
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.536
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
66
Gunning-Fog Score
10
Coleman-Liau Index
10.5
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
9.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.9
Sprache Readability Score
4.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
10
Sprache Difficult Word Count
12
Peter Navarro
00:11:25-00:11:48 (22 sec)No Signal (0)
My original question is, uh, in people's minds, do you think going across America is the probability that the 2020 election was stolen, has that gone up in people's minds because of the evidence they've seen, the answer is unequivocally yes. So it's important beyond measure to pass the Save America Act and I think there'll be even more support.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
42.4
Gunning-Fog Score
16
Coleman-Liau Index
10.8
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.7
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Peter Navarro
00:11:48-00:12:20 (32 sec)No Signal (0)
It's over 80 percent now. It should go to -- I mean, who can object to it other than the, uh, the radical Democrats who like to mess with our election? I don't want to get too partisan here, but let's be clear. I mean, you just -- I mean, I came home last night from the speech. I was honored to be here, and, uh, turned the television on and CNN's there, and they're just -- I mean, they haven't read anything, and they're just spinning their talking points.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.68
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.674
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
5.7
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
85.1
Gunning-Fog Score
9.3
Coleman-Liau Index
7.1
SMOG Index
9.5
Automated Readability Index
5.6
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.6
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
15
Sprache Difficult Word Count
19
Peter Navarro
00:12:20-00:12:57 (37 sec)No Signal (0)
It's just total denial. And look, I would ask the media to do a little gut check here on this particular issue and try to look beyond your Trump derangement syndrome and your partisan, this and that, and see that our election system is highly vulnerable now, and 2020 was a watershed in that vulnerability because COVID enabled a lot of so-called reforms that essentially created vulnerabilities.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.562
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35.5
Gunning-Fog Score
19
Coleman-Liau Index
11.7
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
7.3
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
24
Sprache Difficult Word Count
24
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
0.8
Coleman-Liau Index
1.7
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.1
Sprache Readability Score
1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
1
Question
00:12:57-00:13:03 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
Was this issue raised by the president when he visited China early this early this year?
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8.4
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
63.7
Gunning-Fog Score
8.9
Coleman-Liau Index
10.7
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
7.8
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.7
Sprache Readability Score
3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.8
Coleman-Liau Index
1.1
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
3.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.4
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
2
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Question
00:13:06-00:13:12 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
Will President Trump support and sign the Russia sanctions bill in the Senate, which imposes --
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.688
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.68
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
7.6
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
67.5
Gunning-Fog Score
11.3
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
10.2
Dale-Chall Readability Score
8.1
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
7
Sprache Difficult Word Count
8
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
2.5
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
2
Question
00:13:14-00:13:20 (5 sec)No Signal (0)
Given what the president said last night, do you think he should still invite President Xi to the White House in September?
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
8
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
76.8
Gunning-Fog Score
8.8
Coleman-Liau Index
11
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
11
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4
Sprache Readability Score
3.6
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
4
Sprache Difficult Word Count
4
Peter Navarro
00:13:20-00:13:48 (28 sec)No Signal (0)
Above my pay grade. I think, again, what happened last night is about raising people's awareness through credible information that hitherto has been classified. I mean, think about this President Trump has released these declassified information, which never should have been classified, to help the American people understand the vulnerabilities in our election system.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Government
Score:
0.717
Code:
20000593
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000593
Wikidata_id:
Q7188
Wikidata_label:
government
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.68
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Government > defense > Security Measures (defense) > National Security
Score:
0.574
Code:
20000604
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000604
Wikidata_id:
Q258307
Wikidata_label:
national security
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
35
Gunning-Fog Score
16.1
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
6.2
Sprache Readability Score
4.3
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
18
Sprache Difficult Word Count
18
Peter Navarro
00:13:48-00:13:53 (6 sec)No Signal (0)
The SAVE America Act is the key to saving that. I'm going to take one more. Yes, ma'am.
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
1.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
97.3
Gunning-Fog Score
2.4
Coleman-Liau Index
5.1
SMOG Index
6.6
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
2.9
Sprache Readability Score
1.8
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
5
Question
00:13:53-00:14:06 (13 sec)No Signal (0)
[Inaudible] what's your answer to the opposition, say that the President might want to delegitimize the results? What's your answer to the opposition, the Democrats who say that the president might want to delegitimize --
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.643
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
10.2
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.7
Gunning-Fog Score
11.4
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
10.9
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.6
Sprache Readability Score
3.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
8
Sprache Difficult Word Count
6
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
0
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
100
Gunning-Fog Score
1.6
Coleman-Liau Index
6.2
SMOG Index
3.3
Automated Readability Index
0
Dale-Chall Readability Score
0.2
Sprache Readability Score
1.1
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
0
Sprache Difficult Word Count
0
Sentiment
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
0
Gunning-Fog Score
18
Coleman-Liau Index
12
SMOG Index
11.3
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
9.7
Sprache Readability Score
1.5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
3
Sprache Difficult Word Count
3
Peter Navarro
00:14:13-00:14:39 (26 sec)No Signal (0)
It's just spin. I mean, look, if you pass the SAVE America Act and you get voter ID and, and proof of citizenship and you crack down on this reckless use of absentee ballots, uh, we'll have a more secure election with integrity and, most importantly, the American people will have more faith in the elections and are more likely to vote.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics > Election
Score:
0.71
Code:
20000574
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000574
Wikidata_id:
Q40231
Wikidata_label:
public election
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.599
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Topic:
Politics > Election > Voting
Score:
0.526
Code:
20000586
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/20000586
Wikidata_id:
Q189760
Wikidata_label:
voting
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
12
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
51.2
Gunning-Fog Score
16.3
Coleman-Liau Index
9.4
SMOG Index
12
Automated Readability Index
12
Dale-Chall Readability Score
5.6
Sprache Readability Score
5
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
16
Sprache Difficult Word Count
21
Peter Navarro
00:14:39-00:15:03 (24 sec)No Signal (0)
I mean, one of the things I'm concerned about is people are so disgusted with how insecure our elections are that they stay home, that democracy withers when you don't have an election system that works. Um, C-Span, I thank you. Uh, and I'm out of here. Thanks a lot. Thanks a lot.
Sentiment
Topics
Topic:
Politics
Score:
0.571
Code:
11000000
Url:
https://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/mediatopic/11000000
Wikidata_id:
Q7163
Wikidata_label:
politics
Source:
IPTC Media
Readability
Flesch-Kincaid Grade
3.9
Flesch-Kincaid Ease
86.2
Gunning-Fog Score
8
Coleman-Liau Index
7.6
SMOG Index
9
Automated Readability Index
2.7
Dale-Chall Readability Score
4.3
Sprache Readability Score
2.9
Dale-Chall Difficult Word Score
13
Sprache Difficult Word Count
11