Policy · 117th Congress
Supreme Court takes on cases about Texas abortion law
The justices agreed to decide issues in two lawsuits — one from abortion providers and one from the Justice Department — and set both for oral argument Nov. 1.
Search the Roll Call archive by keyword, date, Congress, section, or tags.
The justices agreed to decide issues in two lawsuits — one from abortion providers and one from the Justice Department — and set both for oral argument Nov. 1.
The 1-cent fee on each milligram of active opioid ingredient per dose would be footed by manufacturers, producers or importers, with some discounts or rebates given when prescribed to hospice and cancer
Photos of the week ending Oct. 1, 2021: Congress as seen by CQ Roll Call's photojournalists.
He used an example of a law that fined people $1 million for criticizing the president.
officer of the National Women’s Law Center, said at Wednesday’s Judiciary hearing that the Supreme Court’s non-action in Texas meant that the justices effectively overturned 50 years of precedent for 1
That includes concerns about which president would pick those judges, the roughly $1 million annual cost each new judgeship would bring, and whether any measure should make bigger changes, particularly
“My Name is Pauli Murray” is playing in theaters now, including at Landmark E Street in Washington and Landmark Bethesda Row, and will begin streaming on Amazon on Oct. 1.
The Supreme Court also announced it will hear oral arguments on Dec. 1 in Dobbs v.
On Monday, the Supreme Court announced it would begin to consider on Dec. 1 a Mississippi case that could lead to the overturning of Roe v Wade next year.
conservatives ramp up their opposition and as voting rights activists push for the bill and another high-profile piece of Democrats’ agenda, a broader campaign finance and elections overhaul known as HR 1.
Corrected Sept. 1 | ANALYSIS — Less than 12 hours after Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, close to 150 members of Congress, Republicans and Democrats,
A companion measure called the For the People Act, or HR 1, that would overhaul voting, ethics and campaign finance laws, stalled in the chamber in June after a procedural vote to begin debate did not
The administration formally ended the policy on June 1.
At the conclusion of his review, Mayorkas permanently ended what are known as the Migrant Protection Protocols in a seven-page memo on June 1.
The House has passed one sweeping bill — dubbed HR 1, or the For the People Act — that sets standards for voting and overhauls campaign finance and ethics law.
Arkoosh raised $1 million, followed by Kenyatta with $503,000. Fetterman also led the Democratic field with nearly $3.1 million left in his campaign account as of June 30.
(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) [jwp-video n=”1″]
One of those bills, dubbed HR 1, would make sweeping changes to political money, elections, influence and ethics and was passed by the House in March.
In a 2-1 ruling, a three-judge panel of the U.S.
Democrats’ first effort at elections legislation, HR 1, passed the House in March before falling short of the Senate’s filibuster threshold in a 50-50 vote last month.