Congress · 116th Congress
Senate rejects Trump’s emergency declaration on border
Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 14, 2019var rcrdTwitter = 1; Sen. Rand Paul, who voted against the president, said Trump wasn’t angry.
Search the Roll Call archive by keyword, date, Congress, section, or tags.
Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 14, 2019var rcrdTwitter = 1; Sen. Rand Paul, who voted against the president, said Trump wasn’t angry.
Also watch: Trump announces national emergency on border, despite likely legal challenge [jwp-video n=”1″] Over 300 projects on bases in about 40 states and territories and abroad could be
Also watch: First 2020 Senate race ratings are here [jwp-video n=”1″] A handful of other senators with potentially competitive races voted against the resolution, including John Cornyn of
Also watch: Cohen vs. the GOP — the many defenses for Trump [jwp-video n=”1″] A larger purpose House Democrats, of course, have a different view of the Cohen hearing, in which the former
Why presidential budget requests are usually dead on arrival, explained [jwp-video n=”1″]
Also watch: Why presidential budget requests are usually dead on arrival, explained [jwp-video n=”1″] COLA for the Pentagon?
Management and Budget, Department budget justification documents, CQ appropriations coverage Also watch: Why presidential budget requests are usually dead on arrival, explained [jwp-video n=”1″
The administration is asking lawmakers for $200 billion as an initial payment toward the president’s goal — up to $1.5 trillion from $1 trillion — for a sweeping project to upgrade the country’s roads
Riggleman still slings whiskey at his wife’s Virginia distillery [jwp-video n=”1″]
She added that her congressional health insurance did not start until Feb. 1, weeks after she was sworn into office. Though they hail from the far ends of the political spectrum, Reps.
Violence Against Women Act witness: Title IX is moot ‘because men can be women’ [jwp-video n=”1″]
Why presidential budget requests are usually dead on arrival, explained [jwp-video n=”1″] “I don’t think good growth policies have to obsess necessarily about the budget deficits,” National
Democrats have offered legislation (HR 1) to require that the justices would be. When Georgia Democrat Sanford D.
Watch: Pelosi focuses on HR1 and the anti-Semitism resolution in weekly presser [jwp-video n=”1″]
From the archives: How the appropriations process is supposed to work [jwp-video n=”1″] One sentence to build it all The omnibus provision states the following: “Beginning in fiscal year
Pot proponents on the Hill say it’s high time for serious policy debate [jwp-video n=”1″] Among the unsolved issues: lack of protections from federal prosecution for dispensaries in the 10 states
HR 1, formally titled the For the People Act after Democrats’ 2018 campaign slogan, is a government overhaul package featuring changes to voting, campaign finance and ethics laws.
Another $1 billion or so has been lopped off by the automatic cuts to “mandatory” spending known as a sequester, which first triggered in fiscal 2013 and are set to continue through fiscal 2027.
This time around, prolonged negotiations seem all too likely, with the austere sequester caps on defense and domestic discretionary funding set to kick back in on Oct. 1, the start of the new fiscal year
The Democrats’ sweeping signature legislative push on ethics and elections, HR 1, would create a formal ethics code for Supreme Court justices, who are exempt from the code of conduct for federal