Search the Roll Call archive by keyword, date, Congress, section, or tags.
↵↵The filings were in response to an appeal from the state Republican Party and Republican state officials, who have asked the justices to set aside a 2-1 lower court decision that allowed the state to
↵↵Earlier this month, a 2-1 majority of a three-judge panel ruled against the challengers, finding the evidence of partisan motivations for the lines was "overwhelming" while evidence of gerrymandering
↵↵The 2-1 decision, written after the judges held a three-day evidentiary hearing, rejected claims that the new congressional lines gerrymandered in favor of the state's Hispanic and Latino communities
A new leader to run the private university would be expected to start July 1 — will they be Trump-friendly, or a fighter?
↵↵Thursday's order faulted a 2-1 panel of lower court judges for stepping in on the "eve" of next year's election to order the Lone Star State to use its prior congressional map from 2021.
↵↵Texas officials have appealed the 2-1 lower court ruling that found the state's map redrawn this year is an illegal racial gerrymander and forced the state to use its prior map drawn in 2021 after the