Skip to content

Smith: DREAM Act Was Overbroad

In the Jan. 1 article “Immigration-Reform Lobbyists Prepare for Tough Crowd in 112th,” an official from the pro-amnesty group America’s Voice puts words into my mouth. I have never and would never call illegal immigrants “gangbangers.”

But the DREAM Act that Congress considered was so overbroad that it would have given amnesty to some criminals. That is a statement of fact, not name-calling. As we’ve seen recently, when pro-amnesty groups feel that their agenda is threatened, they resort to gross misrepresentations. These types of attacks are typical because they are unwilling to debate the facts.

Under the DREAM Act, illegal immigrants could get amnesty even if they have committed crimes like driving under the influence, passport fraud and visa fraud.

Once an application is filed, no matter how fraudulent, the federal government is prohibited from deporting the applicant. And once the amnesty recipients become citizens and turn 21, they can sponsor their illegal immigrant parents for legalization, who can then sponsor others. This kind of chain migration only encourages more illegal immigration.

— Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), House Judiciary chairman

Recent Stories

Flock cameras controversy set for Senate hearing

‘Some months, you don’t even have to come to work’ — Congressional Hits and Misses

Pentagon’s latest Iran war cost estimate: $43.6 billion

In a ‘very hard’ year for women in Congress, at least there’s still softball

Photos of the week | September 12-18, 2026

Before the final midterm whistle, Senate spends time on sports