Skip to content

Heard on the Hill: The Savior of Circumcision?

In November, San Francisco voters will decide on a measure to ban male circumcision unless Rep. Brad Sherman can stop them.

The California Democrat announced Tuesday that he will introduce the Religious and Parental Rights Defense Act, which would prevent cities and municipalities from banning the procedure.

Recently, a measure banning circumcision for men under age 18 — with a possible $1,000 penalty and one-year prison term — has qualified for a spot on San Francisco’s November ballot.

“Male circumcision has been practiced for thousands of years and is a deeply important ceremony for two major religions,” Sherman says in a statement. “Circumcision is obligatory for Jewish-born males — it must be performed on the eighth day after birth and is only postponed in the case of threat to the life or health of the child. Muslim parents also circumcise their male children.” 

He points out that nothing in his bill would prohibit a requirement that the procedure occur in a hygienic manner. Well, thank goodness.

Recent Stories

Cleaver calls for ‘bold’ congressional response to hurricanes

Tax veterans see protracted standoff over expiring breaks

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: Turnout will …

Photos of the week ending October 11, 2024

Helene, Milton wreckage puts spotlight on disaster loan program

Trump pitches tax write-off for auto loans in Detroit speech