Skip to content

Rand Evaluates Joint Fighter Programs

Rand Corporation asks whether “joint fighter programs save money” and concludes that “unless the participating services have identical, stable requirements, the U.S. Department of Defense should avoid future joint fighter and other complex joint aircraft development programs.”  

Key findings:

  • “Joint Aircraft Programs Have Not Historically Saved Overall Life Cycle Cost”
  • “Joint Strike Fighter Is Not on the Path to Achieving the Savings Anticipated at Milestone B”
  • “The Difficulty of Reconciling Diverse Service Requirements in a Common Design Is a Major Factor in Joint Cost Outcomes”
  • “Joint Aircraft Programs Have Historically Been Associated with a Shrinking Combat Aircraft Industrial Base”
  • “Joint Aircraft Programs Could Increase Operational and Strategic Risk to Warfighters”

Recent Stories

Capitol Ink | Road warrior

Appropriators approve Legislative Branch spending bill with GAO cuts

The 10 most vulnerable House members, less than 6 months from Election Day

Will the House ban staff from prediction markets? These members aren’t waiting

Trump’s influence on GOP primaries spurs ‘pretty sour’ feelings

‘Anti-weaponization fund’ mobilizes resistance among Democrats