Skip to content

Rand Evaluates Joint Fighter Programs

Rand Corporation asks whether “joint fighter programs save money” and concludes that “unless the participating services have identical, stable requirements, the U.S. Department of Defense should avoid future joint fighter and other complex joint aircraft development programs.”  

Key findings:

  • “Joint Aircraft Programs Have Not Historically Saved Overall Life Cycle Cost”
  • “Joint Strike Fighter Is Not on the Path to Achieving the Savings Anticipated at Milestone B”
  • “The Difficulty of Reconciling Diverse Service Requirements in a Common Design Is a Major Factor in Joint Cost Outcomes”
  • “Joint Aircraft Programs Have Historically Been Associated with a Shrinking Combat Aircraft Industrial Base”
  • “Joint Aircraft Programs Could Increase Operational and Strategic Risk to Warfighters”

Recent Stories

‘Mean and petty’: Democrats slam hideaway evictions of Hoyer, Pelosi

After disappointing election, McCarthy’s reign was rocky from the start

How Patrick McHenry went from partisan ‘attack dog’ to holding the fate of the House in his hands

‘Type A’ personalities paralyze House after historic McCarthy ouster

House uncertainty puts shutdown specter right back on the table

Congress made $80 billion-plus in changes to defense budget