Skip to content

Eric Holder Lame-Duck Fight? White House Points to McConnell Precedent

Earnest offered to the 2006 lame-duck confirmation of Robert Gates, supported then by McConnell, as precedent for confirming Holder's successor.  (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)
Earnest offered to the 2006 lame-duck confirmation of Robert Gates, supported then by McConnell, as precedent for confirming Holder's successor.  (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest is citing Sen. Mitch McConnell’s support for the lame-duck confirmation of then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates in 2006 as precedent for a quick confirmation of a replacement for Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.  

Earnest made the reference Friday at the his daily briefing, although he did not lay out a timetable for the president to make his decision.  

He noted unprompted that the Gates nomination came the day after midterm elections with Democrats winning control of the chamber, and McConnell, R-Ky., did not propose waiting until the new Democratic Senate took over before holding a vote.  

Gates, however, won overwhelming support — a 95-2 vote — and a delay would not have affected the outcome.  

Earnest also noted the swift confirmation of Michael Mukasey as attorney general in 2007 by a Senate of the other party.  

The Mukasey vote was narrow — 53-40.  

The White House hopes for quick consideration under either scenario.  

Related:

Lawmakers Weigh In on Holder Resignation


Senate Democrats Will Have Chance to Confirm Successor


Holder Resigns With a Wink and a Nod (Video)


Roll Call Election Map: Race Ratings for Every Seat


Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call in your inbox or on your iPhone.

Recent Stories

Twelve states ask trade court to halt Trump tariffs

Durbin’s run at Judiciary Committee focused on immigration, judges

Former NFL player Jay Feely launches bid for Congress in Arizona 

Durbin announces retirement, capping off decadeslong career in Congress

First-quarter tax lobbying bonanza as reconciliation beckons

Capitol Ink | Constitutional wrecking ball