Skip to content

Democrats’ Absence Not Halting Procession of Trump Judicial Nominees

Recess week hearing features two nominees for the Ninth Circuit

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch has been a regular participant in the Judiciary Committee hearings during the Senate recess. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch has been a regular participant in the Judiciary Committee hearings during the Senate recess. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

For the second week in a row, no Senate Democrats made the trip back to D.C. to question a slate of President Donald Trump’s nominees for lifetime appointments to the federal bench, but their boycott is not impeding the GOP’s ability to line up those nominees for confirmation by the end of the year. 

Sen. Michael D. Crapo of Idaho presided over the hearing, which also featured an appearance by former Chairman Orrin G. Hatch of Utah. Democrats have decried the unusual recess hearings as a further erosion of senatorial courtesy and an indication of Republicans’ desire to ram through judges regardless of institutional protocol.

Judiciary Chairman Charles E. Grassley of Iowa has brushed aside the criticism, saying Democrats did not technically object to the hearings. Grassley did not show up for either Wednesday’s hearing or last week’s hearing. 

The Utah Republican was most enthusiastic about introducing Richard Hertling, a former aide to both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, who has been nominated by Trump for a seat on the court of federal claims.

“As a long-time former staff member to four of our colleagues and a former counsel on this committee, Richard needs little introduction to the Judiciary Committee,” Hatch said. “I first got to know Richard when he joined the Judiciary Committee staff of our former colleague Arlen Specter at the beginning of 1990, almost 29 years ago.”

Hatch said that he was friends with Hertling’s father, who he said had served during the Battle of the Bulge.

“Having known the father, I had high expectations for the son. And I certainly have not been disappointed,” Hatch said.

Democrats had contested, and effectively boycotted, the holding of confirmation hearing for the four nominees, including two for seats on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

But with Bridget S. Bade, Eric Miller, Karin Immergut and Hertling now having testified, they will be eligible for addition to the Judiciary Committee’s schedule for a markup that will likely be scheduled for Thursday, Nov. 15. The nominees from last week could make that agenda, as well.

Under the normal procedures of the Judiciary Committee, the nominees appearing on the agenda for the first time would be held over for a week, which would get them lined up for floor consideration starting a week after Thanksgiving.

Booze, Prohibition and the Man in the Green Hat: An Original October Surprise

[jwp-video n=”1″]

Recent Stories

Railroad industry is running late on Biden’s climate track

Want to understand the Electoral College? Just look at California

Election roundup: Mace wins early, Golden to face ex-NASCAR driver

Ohio voters tap Rulli for House vacancy, boosting GOP’s majority

Bannon makes emergency appeal to stay out of prison

House GOP tees up vote on contempt of Congress for Garland