Skip to content

Does labeling protest ‘domestic terrorism’ weaken national security — and First Amendment protections?

Just who is a “domestic terrorist,” and what is the danger when a protest is labeled “an act of domestic terrorism”? President Donald Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, has announced a drawdown of troops in Minnesota, where immigration raids swept up many, including U.S. citizens, triggered protests and left two of those citizens dead. But the administration hasn’t ruled out future surges across the country.

In analyzing federal actions in the past and yet to come, Rachel Levinson-Waldman, director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, doesn’t deny the presence of domestic terrorists among us. But does the Trump administration’s expansive definition of the term clash with First Amendment rights? And do recent enforcement activities make us more or less safe? Levinson-Waldman explains on this episode of Equal Time. 

Recent Stories

Court challenges mount over Trump’s funding clawback

Schmitt show  — Congressional Hits and Misses

Photos of the week | September 25-October 1, 2026

House Democrats grow more bullish about midterms as target list expands

Guns, voting and immigration on deck for Supreme Court

‘Pain in the ass’: Trump again shows annoyance with Paxton after leaked audio