Opinion · 117th Congress
‘Quite extraordinary’: Taking control in November would unleash a GOP leadership maelstrom
“Well, what they’re doing, what he’s doing with his Super PAC is totally different than what we do,” he said.
Search the Roll Call archive by keyword, date, Congress, section, or tags.
“Well, what they’re doing, what he’s doing with his Super PAC is totally different than what we do,” he said.
More offense: A super PAC affiliated with the minority leader, the Senate Leadership Fund, is spending money Scott’s outfit doesn’t have to pour into races, according to Federal Election Commission
One of the steps we took was to encourage members of Congress to reject corporate PAC money.
If media reports are correct that the PAC spent on direct advertising only about a third of the $90 million it raised, with much going to board members and their companies, I suspect Democratic donors
What does the public understand that PAC critics don’t? For starters, PACs are the best example of campaign finance reform that works.
[jwp-video n=”1″] Some of these private reassessments have been prompted by the crassest reason imaginable — the growing corporate move to cut off PAC support for the 147 senators and House
with hundreds of thousands of past donations to the National Republican Congressional Committee, House and Senate members including Perdue and Isakson, and $750,000 to Mitt Romney’s presidential super PAC
Just ask Jeb Bush, whose super PAC alone raised more than $110 million for 2016.
During the 2016 campaign cycle, Nielsen had been a loyal Bushie, contributing $2,500 to Jeb’s super PAC, Right to Rise.