Skip to content

Reid: No Time for Earmark Ban in Lame Duck

Updated: 4:52 p.m.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Tuesday that he would block efforts to force a vote on a mandatory ban on earmarks through fiscal 2013, saying the Senate simply does not have enough time to consider the measure.

Following the Democrats’ luncheon, Reid rejected a plan by Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) to try to attach the ban to a food safety bill.

“The legislation that we’re dealing with, we, as you know, with the limited time we have, if I’m able to get cloture on any of the issues that I bring up, it’s not going to be open amendment process, because we simply don’t have time for that,” Reid said.

The Democratic leader did, however, pledge to find some time in the unspecified future to deal with the problem of earmarks.

“I would be happy … to set up a reasonable time to have a debate on that and have a vote on it,” Reid said.

John Hart, a spokesman for Coburn, criticized Reid’s decision.

“It’s disappointing Sen. Reid wants to obstruct a bipartisan effort to enact an earmark moratorium,” he said Tuesday. “The American people, by a 2-to-1 margin, want to end this practice.  Refusing to listen to those concerns is anti-democratic.”

Recent Stories

Pope Francis, first pontiff to address Congress, dies on Easter Monday

Judge blocks latest attempt to slash CFPB

Supreme Court to hear arguments over preventive care task force

Trump puts Italy’s Meloni in high-pressure role as bridge to EU on tariffs

Supreme Court to review Trump birthright citizenship order

At the Races: Only the young