Skip to content

Whistleblower website for Capitol Police officers launches

Online intake form provides another avenue for officers to report problems

Capitol Police officers take up positions by the Capitol Reflecting Pool on Sept. 18 before a rally for jailed Jan. 6 rioters.
Capitol Police officers take up positions by the Capitol Reflecting Pool on Sept. 18 before a rally for jailed Jan. 6 rioters. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call file photo)

House Administration ranking member Rodney Davis on Monday announced the launch of a webpage for Capitol Police officers to confidentially report problems affecting the department directly to the committee, which has oversight of the police force.

“This committee has a responsibility to the men and women who protect the Capitol to provide oversight of their leadership and part of this is hearing from officers and other personnel when issues arise,” the Illinois Republican said in a statement.

The online intake form provides a space for officers and staff of the Capitol Police and House sergeant-at-arms to report problems directly to the committee’s GOP staff. To protect the privacy of officers, the form cautions them against submitting complaints using work resources or while working.

The website also provides the option for officers to meet in person, call or email the committee to report misconduct.

“To be honest, it’s a way towards transparency,” said Gus Papathanasiou, the head of the Capitol Police union. “If Rodney Davis wants to do it, I support it.”

Anyone can submit complaints to Capitol Police Inspector General Michael A. Bolton’s office, but the new site gives officers another avenue to raise issues with House Administration staff.

Capitol Police were thrust into the forefront after the breaching of the Capitol by pro-Trump rioters on Jan. 6 and the fallout that came from a lack of planning. Even before that spotlight, the force struggled with systemic failures and a shortfall of accountability. The Capitol Police inspector general reports are still unavailable to the public, and the force is shielded from the Freedom of Information Act.

But Davis sees the new venue as a step in the right direction.

“I know not every rank-and-file officer or employee is comfortable with speaking out publicly about these issues, but it’s important we hear from them, and this provides a confidential way for them to do that,” he said. “We’ve needed greater transparency and accountability within our security system for a long time, and hopefully this will help.”

Recent Stories

Total eclipse of the Hart (and Russell buildings) — Congressional Hits and Misses

House plans to send Mayorkas impeachment articles to Senate on Tuesday

Harris sticks with Agriculture spending, Amodei likely to head DHS panel

Editor’s Note: What passes for normal in Congress

House approves surveillance authority reauthorization bill

White House rattles its saber with warnings to Iran, China about attacking US allies