Skip to content

Bashing lobbyists on the presidential campaign trail has been integral to both Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) and Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) political playbooks.

And while many lobbyists have questioned the genuineness of that message — both candidates still rely on them for policy advice — among delegates in Denver, at least, the anti-lobbyist rhetoric resonates.

“There has been a culture of dishonesty, cronyism to a huge degree, poor judgment and the expectation of self interest instead of what’s best for the people of the United States,” said Katherine Satrom, a delegate from North Dakota.

Despite the heady rhetoric, however, many delegates on the campaign trail don’t expect lobbyists to go by the wayside; more importantly is the belief that their proper role is as information gatherers, not influence peddlers.

For Matt Connealy, executive director of the Nebraska Democratic Party, the real issue is the money that lobbyists bring into the system. Connealy, who ran for Congress in 2004 in Nebraska but was defeated by Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R), said the mood today is much different than four years ago.

Obama “will change the way we would work with Washington,” Connealy said. “The K Street types are good information gatherers but won’t be the turnkey for influence.”

Connealy’s not alone.

Frances Huntley-Cooper, a delegate and former mayor of Fitchburg, Wis., said that for her, Obama’s policy against taking corporate political action committee money is emblematic of how he has run his campaign.

“He didn’t really focus on the PAC money,” Huntley-Cooper said. He leads the money race not “by getting the big bucks but by getting real folks’ money, getting $5 weekly — people who have never contributed before,” she said. “He has pulled people in to feel a part of the process.”

Some of the delegates, though, took a more nuanced view of the influence industry — and sometimes for obvious reasons.

Washington state delegate Naki Stevens is a lobbyist in Olympia for the environmental group People for Puget Sound.

“There are plenty of D.C. lobbyists working for good causes,” she said. “I hate to see everybody tarred with the same brush.”

There’s a difference, she noted, between people who go into lobbying “to make a fortune and those who are trying to make a difference.”

But, she added, the well-heeled corporate interests still wield far too much power in the system. “I do think lobbying in D.C. has gotten out of hand,” Stevens said.

Another delegate, stay-at-home mom September McCrady of North Carolina, said that like political action committee, lobbying has become a dirty word on the campaign trail.

“There are good ones and bad ones,” the first-time delegate said of influence peddlers.

Lobbyists serve a necessary and useful purpose, she added, because in many cases they represent the interests of people who wouldn’t otherwise have time to meet with Members of Congress and other officials.

“Everybody can’t live right in the capital,” McCrady said.

But, she added, Obama’s message of reforming corporate interests’ voice in politics is on point. “The corporate involvement needs to be reformed,” she said.

Recent Stories

Kim launches primary challenge after Menendez refuses to quit

Four spending bills readied for House floor amid stopgap uncertainty

Menendez rejects New Jersey Democrats’ calls to resign after indictment

Photos of the week ending September 22, 2023

Dressing down — Congressional Hits and Misses

Menendez indictment comes with Democrats playing 2024 defense