Skip to content

The Law of Cyber Self-Defense Is Far From Clear

Benjamin Brake digs into the legal complexities of using cyber capabilities in self-defense.  

“Claims that technical experts have solved attribution ignore legal challenges that could slow or limit how states might lawfully respond to a major cyberattack. First, a country hit with a major cyberattack would face the novel challenge of persuading allies that the scale and effects of a cyberattack were grave enough to trigger a right to self-defense under theUN Charter.”  

“If a victim state does corral a consensus that the right to use force in self-defense has been triggered, a second legal question could compound the attribution challenge even further. Can the actions of a hacker be attributed to a nation-state as a matter of law? Answering this question presents a major legal hurdle if the attack is launched by an ostensibly non-state hacker with murky ties to an adversary government—a growing trend already seen in cyberattacks linked to Russia and Iran.”

Recent Stories

DHS tightens protocol for lawmaker visits to immigration facilities

Senate Republicans echo Trump allegations on Biden autopen use

At the Races: The politics of war

On Iran strikes messaging, Trump aides opt to run it up the flagpole

Anthony D’Esposito looks to go from cop to congressman to inspector general

Outlook darkens for Social Security, Medicare solvency