Skip to content

Investigation of Airstrike Against Kunduz Hospital Raises Additional Questions

AP reports on the developing story of how a U.S. airstrike targeted a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan.  

“Afghan forces who reported being under Taliban fire requested the U.S. airstrike that killed 22 people at a medical clinic in northern Afghanistan over the weekend, the top commander of American and coalition forces in Afghanistan said Monday… The strike wasn’t sought by U.S. forces, Gen. John F. Campbell said at a hastily arranged Pentagon news conference.”  

“On Saturday, Afghan officials said Taliban fighters were in the hospital at the time of the airstrike, but that is in dispute. On Sunday, NATO, under whose umbrella the U.S.-led coalition operates in Afghanistan, issued a statement saying U.S. forces had conducted an airstrike against ‘insurgents who were directly firing upon U.S. service members’ who were advising Afghan forces in Kunduz. The statement also said NATO was undertaking a preliminary assessment of the incident.”  

“The U.S. military is doing its own standard investigation under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Campbell’s revised account does not clarify whether the clinic was targeted in error or whether U.S. military personnel followed procedure. They are required to verify that the target of the requested airstrike is valid before firing. Asked about those procedures, Campbell said he would not discuss the rules of engagement under which U.S. forces operate… He said he learned from the U.S. military’s lead investigator that it was the Afghans, not the Americans, who requested the airstrike.”

Recent Stories

Biden makes formal plea to Congress for disaster loan funds

One month out, Democrats say they are expanding House field

Supreme Court to decide cases on nuclear fuel storage, gun lawsuit

Calling Trump ‘petty’ and ‘vindictive,’ Liz Cheney makes conservative case for Harris

Bipartisan Senate bill prods US to help end Sudan war

Pentagon voices ‘significant concern’ with many NDAA provisions