Skip to content

Trump-Gillibrand Offer Possible 2020 Preview After Racy Tweet

Schumer: Trump’s ‘tweet was nasty — unbecoming of the president’

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, left, and New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand leave a Democratic Conference lunch in the Capitol in May. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call file photo)
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, left, and New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand leave a Democratic Conference lunch in the Capitol in May. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call file photo)

House and Senate Republicans raced to finish their tax bill. Both parties postured about a government shutdown. All of that was drowned out Tuesday by President Donald Trump’s Twitter war with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.

The president went after the New York Democrat with a Tuesday morning tweet that alleged she “would do anything” for his campaign contributions before he ran for president. 

Gillibrand and other Democrats spent much of the day blasting Trump for what they labeled sexual innuendo beneath the dignity of the White House.

“That tweet was nasty — unbecoming of the president,” Schumer said, coming to the defense of his fellow New Yorker.

Tuesday’s Trump-Gillibrand back-and-forth was a possible 2020 preview. The junior New York senator is among a list of Democrats mentioned as possible presidential contenders. So is Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who fired a tweet back at Trump asking if he was trying to “bully, intimidate and slut-shame” Gillibrand.

“Good luck with that,” Warren wrote.

In his tweet, the president dubbed Gillibrand a “lightweight” and “a total flunky for Chuck Schumer” before telling his 44 million followers that she would “come to my office ‘begging’ for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them).”

Gillibrand hit back a few hours later with a tweet of her own, telling him: “You cannot silence me or the millions of women who have gotten off the sidelines to speak out about the unfitness and shame you have brought to the Oval Office.”

What set Trump off? Gillibrand told CNN on Monday that Trump should resign due to the allegations of sexual misconduct against him and was one of more than 50 female Democratic lawmakers asking the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to open an investigation into those allegations.

As expected, just what the president meant by “anything” was the first question posed to Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders during Tuesday’s White House press briefing.

She said Trump has “used the same sentiment” and terminology about politicians of both genders and parties for years while trying to expose “the corruption” of the political system.

Trump said last year 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney “would have dropped to his knees” to get his endorsement.

Sanders told reporters Trump has used that terminology “many times” over the years, so “there’s no way that [tweet] is sexist at all.” She also denied that the president’s attack was any more personal than Gillibrand’s recent hard criticism and calls for him to step down.

The president’s tweet about Gillibrand came up when House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy and other members of the California delegation addressed reporters after a meeting with Vice President Mike Pence about the federal response to forest fires in their state.

But McCarthy was not interested in addressing the matter when asked if the tweet was productive as lawmakers race to come up with a final tax package and avert a government shutdown next Friday night.

“I watched the president sign the NDAA. That was productive,” McCarthy said of the fiscal 2018 Pentagon policy bill. And with that, they had to go.

“You think I could control that,” he said, turning to leave. “But I can’t.”

Kellie Mejdrich contributed to this report.

Recent Stories

Legal questions surround Trump’s talk of political prosecutions

Trump can make immigration moves on his first day back in office

How RFK Jr.’s health proposals would stack up in practice

High hopes for bald eagle bill in the lame duck

Here’s a look at who’s in — and possibly in — Trump’s second administration

Trump administration faces antitrust enforcement dilemma