Search the Roll Call archive by keyword, date, Congress, section, or tags.
Massachusetts, Action for Boston Community Development President and CEO Sharon Scott-Chandler said her organization was working to secure bridge funding from the state that would have kicked in July 1
"As our lawmakers have become jurors, remind them of your admonition in 1 Corinthians 10:31 — that whatever they do should be done for your glory.
advocates in the North Carolina case argued that Republicans would likely win 10 or 11 of the state’s first attempt at 14 newly drawn congressional seats — in a state former President Donald Trump won by 1
But the Supreme Court canceled oral arguments in the case that had been set for March 1.
Oral argument is scheduled for March 1, and a decision would be expected by the conclusion of the term at the end of June.
In particular, the fair share deficits in six states — California, Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, Michigan and Illinois — each exceed $1 billion.
Oral argument is scheduled for March 1, nearly three years after the border policy was first put into effect.
“The Court finds that race was the predominant factor motivating the General Assembly’s adoption of Congressional District No. 1,” the ruling said.
Matson knew the Respect for Marriage Act was coming up for a vote in the Senate, so he baked a cake for the Supreme Court in “Congressional bakery,” from Dec. 1.
JCT’s summary showed Trump reported net federal income taxes of $0 for the 2020 tax year, $750 in multiple years and almost $1 million one year.
(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) APRIL 1: An April Fools’ Day sign is seen at the “whisper spot” in Statuary Hall in the Capitol. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) APRIL 4: Sen.
Bipartisan support The new law celebrated Tuesday, known as the Respect for Marriage Act, passed the House on a 258-169-1 vote last week, with 39 Republicans voting to support the measure.
The House voted 258-169-1 on the bill that would repeal the 1996 law known as the Defense of Marriage Act that the Supreme Court found to be largely unconstitutional in a 2013 decision.
Court, voter advocates in the North Carolina case argued that Republicans would likely win 10 or 11 of the state’s 14 newly drawn congressional seats — in a state former President Donald Trump won by 1
Voter advocates in the North Carolina case argued that Republicans would likely win 10 or 11 of the state’s 14 newly drawn congressional seats — in a state former President Donald Trump won by 1
the Right” rally and his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol (both of which were graced with Fuentes’ presence), should be a step too far, even for the former president’s No. 1
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, and asked for a resolution by Dec. 1.
In 2012, the first election after the 2010 census redistricting cycle, Democrats won 1 percentage point more of the vote nationally, but Republicans won a 234-seat majority.
Durbin said Tuesday he plans to advance more than a dozen others through the committee before Dec. 1. The committee held a confirmation hearing Tuesday for six nominees.
imagine a clearer case of ‘textually demonstrable constitutional commitment’ of an issue to another branch of government to the exclusion of the courts than the language of Article I, section 5, clause 1